Therapeutic plasma exchange decreases levels of routinely used cardiac and inflammatory biomarkers

The role of apheresis and insulin therapy in hypertriglyceridemic acute pancreatitis-a concise review

Severe hypertriglyceridemia (HTG) is the third most common cause of acute pancreatitis (AP) and is involved in its pathogenesis. Chylomicrons increase blood viscosity and induce ischemia, while free fatty acids induce inflammation and distant organ damage. Conservative treatment options include fasting and insulin; limited evidence shows their comparable efficacy. Plasma exchange might provide more rapid lowering of triglycerides and amelioration of systemic effects of severe AP. Available data from controlled studies show only moderately faster lowering of triglycerides with apheresis (about 70% vs. 50% with conservative treatment within 24 h) and limited data from non-randomized studies show no improvement in clinical outcomes. New evidence is expected soon from ongoing large randomized trials. Until then, insulin may be used in mild HTG-AP and plasma exchange should be considered only in severe HTG-AP, especially if the decline of triglycerides with conservative treatment is slow, and in HTG-AP during pregnancy.

Research priorities for therapeutic plasma exchange in critically ill patients

Therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) is a therapeutic intervention that separates plasma from blood cells to remove pathological factors or to replenish deficient factors. The use of TPE is increasing over the last decades. However, despite a good theoretical rationale and biological plausibility for TPE as a therapy for numerous diseases or syndromes associated with critical illness, TPE in the intensive care unit (ICU) setting has not been studied extensively. A group of eighteen experts around the globe from different clinical backgrounds used a modified Delphi method to phrase key research questions related to "TPE in the critically ill patient". These questions focused on: (1) the pathophysiological role of the removal and replacement process, (2) optimal timing of treatment, (3) dosing and treatment regimes, (4) risk-benefit assumptions and (5) novel indications in need of exploration. For all five topics, the current understanding as well as gaps in knowledge and future directions were assessed. The content should stimulate future research in the field and novel clinical applications.

Increased serum pro-B-type natriuretic peptide in hematopoietic progenitor cell donors stimulated with G-CSF

Hematopoietic stem cells (HPCs) donors mobilized by granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) can develop various signs and symptoms. proBNP (pro-B-type natriuretic peptide) is a serum marker of heart failure. A donor who developed severe adverse reactions after G-CSF mobilization was found to have high serum proBNP levels. We followed additional donors who received identical mobilization regimen to investigate the prevalence of this phenomenon. Eighteen healthy donors underwent a mobilization regimen of 10 μg/Kg G-CSF daily for 5 days prior to allogeneic HPC collection using Spectra Optia between January 2016 and February 2017 were included in this study. Serum proBNP levels were measured before and after G-CSF stimulation and immediately after apheresis. Apheresis collection parameters and other laboratory results were also reviewed. The majority of donors (86.7%) had post-G-CSF elevation of serum proBNP. Seven of those had elevated proBNP above upper normal range (124 pg/ml). The subgroup of donors with normal proBNP is younger (median age of 37 vs 42 years), with majority being male (90.9% vs 28.6%) and with smaller processed blood volume (2.2 vs 3 × total blood volume). This case series demonstrates an increase of serum proBNP can be common in HPC donors stimulated with 5 days of 10 mcg/kg G-CSF. This is an adverse reaction that has not been described before. The temporary elevation of proBNP in these donors is not associated with ventricular dysfunction of the heart. The risk factors for marked elevation of proBNP post-G-CSF should be further investigated.

Plasma exchange in the intensive care unit: a narrative review

In this narrative review, we discuss the relevant issues of therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) in critically ill patients. For many conditions, the optimal indication, device type, frequency, duration, type of replacement fluid and criteria for stopping TPE are uncertain. TPE is a potentially lifesaving but also invasive procedure with risk of adverse events and complications and requires close monitoring by experienced teams. In the intensive care unit (ICU), the indications for TPE can be divided into (1) absolute, well-established, and evidence-based, for which TPE is recognized as first-line therapy, (2) relative, for which TPE is a recognized second-line treatment (alone or combined) and (3) rescue therapy, where TPE is used with a limited or theoretical evidence base. New indications are emerging and ongoing knowledge gaps, notably regarding the use of TPE during critical illness, support the establishment of a TPE registry dedicated to intensive care medicine.

[Role of plasmapheresis and immunoadsorption in salvage therapy of rheumatological diseases]

Many rheumatological diseases are either caused by specific known proteins, such as antibodies or mediated by a plethora of cytokines. Both the unspecific immunosuppressive therapy and the specific action of biologics usually require time to be effective; therefore, extracorporeal forms of treatment are increasingly being employed in severe forms of rheumatological diseases as well as in patients who cannot tolerate pharmacological treatment or where the risk of pharmacological treatment may outweigh the potential benefits. Therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) removes not only pathogenic substances, such as autoantibodies, lipoproteins and circulating immune complexes from the plasma but also cytokines. The removed plasma that is discarded has to be substituted by blood products, e.g. human albumin or fresh frozen plasma. Fresh frozen plasma is always used when missing plasma components must be replenished, such as ADAMTS-13 in thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP). The separated plasma can be further processed by pumping into a hollow fiber filter (cut-off of ~700 kD) and in this way low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and IgM can be eliminated. This treatment mode, called cascade filtration is used to treat diseases, such as Waldenström's macroglobulinemia and cryoglobulinemia. A specific way to remove antibodies is by immunoadsorption in which the antibodies are specifically removed by an adsorber. For this procedure there is no need to substitute blood products. This review article describes the principles of the two different treatment methods, the advantages and disadvantages and also summarizes the current evidence for their use in rheumatological diseases.

Membrane versus centrifuge-based therapeutic plasma exchange: a randomized prospective crossover study

BACKGROUND

Therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) is either performed using a highly permeable filter with standard multifunctional renal replacement equipment (mTPE) or a centrifugation device (cTPE). Although both techniques are well established in clinical practice, performance of these two modes of TPE was never compared in a prospective randomized fashion. Thus we aimed to compare two commercially available therapeutic apheresis systems: mTPE (Octonova with Plasmaflo filter) and cTPE (Spectra Optia apheresis system).

METHODS

Twenty-one patients (age 51.6 ± 13.5 years; 10 F/11 M; BMI 25.1 ± 5.0 kg/m(2)) were enrolled in this randomized, prospective, paired, crossover study performed in the Hannover Medical School, Germany. First treatment (either mTPE or cTPE) was chosen by an online randomization list. The primary endpoints were plasma removal efficiency with 1.2× of the total plasma volume exchanged. Secondary endpoints were total amount of plasma substances removed, such as IgG and fibrinogen. Further, the treatment effect on platelet count and complications were evaluated.

RESULTS

Despite a comparable volume of the processed plasma, mTPE treatment time was 10.5 % longer than cTPE treatment time (p < 0.05), resulting in a 10 % lower plasma removal rate of the mTPE treatment. Both treatments were comparable in terms of decrease in median (IQR) IgG [pre-mTPE 5.34 (3.48-8.37), post-mTPE 1.96 (1.43-2.84) g/L; pre-cTPE 5.88 (3.42-8.84), post-cTPE 1.89 (1.21-3.52) g/L]. Also the median (IQR) amount of IgG removed in mTPE [13.14 (7.42-16.10) g] was not different from the cTPE treatment [9.30 (6.26-15.69) g]. This was also true for IgM removal. Platelet loss during mTPE was nearly twice as much as with cTPE (15 ± 9 versus 7 ± 9 %, p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Although the centrifugal procedures were conducted using flow rates that could easily be obtained using peripheral access, plasma removal efficiency was significantly higher and treatment time was significantly lower in cTPE as compared to mTPE. Despite this lower treatment time, the decline in markers of procedure efficacy was comparable. Especially in centers performing many procedures per year, cTPE in contrast to mTPE can reduce treatment time without compromising treatment efficacy.

Effect of therapeutic plasma exchange on plasma levels and total removal of adipokines and inflammatory markers

Background

Aside from well-established inflammatory mediators adipokines have recently been found to play an important role in a variety of immunologic diseases. Therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) is an established treatment modality for the acute removal of pathophysiological relevant disease mediators. The aim of this study was to determine adipokine removal during TPE therapy.

Methods

21 Caucasian patients (10 females, 11 males) with an indication for TPE using albumin as exchange fluid received two consecutive TPE sessions. Blood samples for measurement of resistin, leptin, sICAM-1, sCD40L, MCP-1, and sTNF-R were drawn before and at the end of each TPE session. Samples from the total removed plasma were collected at the end of every treatment.

Results

We found a significant reduction in pre- vs. post-TPE plasma concentrations for sICAM-1 (517 ± 246 vs. 260 ± 159 ng/ml, p < 0.0001), sTNF-R (8.1 ± 6.4 vs. 5.7 ± 3.9 ng/ml, p < 0.05), and resistin plasma levels (14.3 ± 6.9 vs. 9.5 ± 4.7 ng/ml, p < 0.001). Solely sICAM-1 reduction persisted for 25 ± 5 h between the first and second TPE treatment, while the other investigated mediators increased to baseline levels. Substantial amounts of all measured mediators could be recovered from the removed plasma.

Conclusions

TPE provides a persistent reduction in sICAM-1 levels and temporarily affects several adipokine and cytokine plasma levels. Our findings are of importance not only for the interpretation of blood levels of cytokines in patients undergoing TPE but provide solid evidence that TPE markedly decreases sICAM-1.

Cardiac troponin-I on diagnosis predicts early death and refractoriness in acquired thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura. Experience of the French Thrombotic Microangiopathies Reference Center

BACKGROUND

Cardiac involvement is a major cause of mortality in patients with thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP). However, diagnosis remains underestimated and delayed, owing to subclinical injuries. Cardiac troponin-I measurement (cTnI) on admission could improve the early diagnosis of cardiac involvement and have prognostic value.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the predictive value of cTnI in patients with TTP for death or refractoriness.

PATIENTS/METHODS

The study involved a prospective cohort of adult TTP patients with acquired severe ADAMTS-13 deficiency (< 10%) and included in the registry of the French Reference Center for Thrombotic Microangiopathies. Centralized cTnI measurements were performed on frozen serum on admission.

RESULTS

Between January 2003 and December 2011, 133 patients with TTP (mean age, 48 ± 17 years) had available cTnI measurements on admission. Thirty-two patients (24%) had clinical and/or electrocardiogram features. Nineteen (14.3%) had cardiac symptoms, mainly congestive heart failure and myocardial infarction. Electrocardiogram changes, mainly repolarization disorders, were present in 13 cases. An increased cTnI level (> 0.1 μg L(-1) ) was present in 78 patients (59%), of whom 46 (59%) had no clinical cardiac involvement. The main outcomes were death (25%) and refractoriness (17%). Age (P = 0.02) and cTnI level (P = 0.002) showed the greatest impact on survival. A cTnI level of > 0.25 μg L(-1) was the only independent factor in predicting death (odds ratio [OR] 2.87; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.13-7.22; P = 0.024) and/or refractoriness (OR 3.03; 95% CI 1.27-7.3; P = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

A CTnI level of > 0.25 μg L(-1) at presentation in patients with TTP appears to be an independent factor associated with a three-fold increase in the risk of death or refractoriness. Therefore, cTnI level should be considered as a prognostic indicator in patients diagnosed with TTP.