Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with erythroid predominance exhibits clinical and molecular characteristics that differ from other types of AML

Classification of acute myeloid leukemia

The World Health Organization (WHO) Classification of Tumors of Hematopoietic and Lymphoid Tissues was revised in 2017 on the basis of recent high-throughput sequencing and gene expression data on hematologic malignancies. This review explores the current WHO classification of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and related precursor neoplasms, highlighting the changes made in the current edition and focusing on the diagnosis of AML.

RAS mutations in acute myeloid leukaemia patients: A review and meta-analysis

RAS oncogene mutations frequently occur in acute myeloid leukaemia (AML), but the prognostic significance of RAS mutations in AML is inconclusive. We searched the databases of PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, and Cochrane from 1990 to 2018. In this study, 24 eligible studies were included, and the meta-analysis was conducted with the Comprehensive Meta-Analysis Version 2 software program. The row hazard ratio (HR) was adjusted and re-evaluated when publication bias existed after detecting all the heterogeneities. A combined analysis showed that RAS mutations were not associated with a poor prognosis in general AML patients (HR: 0.96, 95% CI: 0.78-1.19, p = 0.70). To further verify the results, a subgroup analysis was conducted. Interestingly, in the analysis of age bracket, children with RAS mutations had an unfavourable survival (HR: 1.35, 95% CI: 1.05-1.75, p = 0.02) of AML, but the adults did not (HR: 0.87, 95% CI: 0.70-1.09, p = 0.21). Further analysis of the subgroup of children indicated that patients with NRAS mutations had an adverse prognosis (HR: 1.55, 95% CI: 1.13-2.12, p = 0.007), but not those with KRAS mutations (HR: 1.51, 95% CI: 0.34-6.73, p = 0.59). In conclusion, this study revealed that RAS mutations did not influence the over survival for adults with AML. However, NRAS mutations may be a key prognostic marker related with poor survival for children with AML.

The 2016 WHO classification of acute myeloid leukemia: What the practicing clinician needs to know

In 2016 a revision of the World Health Organization (WHO) classification of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) was introduced that included changes to several disease categories. The WHO approach results in disease categories that are defined by a combination of clinical, morphologic, immunophenotypic, and genetic features in an attempt to define clinically relevant, biologic entities. This review summarizes the WHO approach as well as the priority of specific features for disease classification. Changes to specific categories, including AML with myelodysplasia-related changes, AML with mutated NPM1, AML with biallelic mutations of CEBPA and erythroleukemia are summarized. The importance of additional gene mutations as well as germline predisposition in AML is also reviewed.

A reevaluation of erythroid predominance in Acute Myeloid Leukemia using the updated WHO 2016 Criteria

The 2016 WHO update changed the diagnostic criteria for myeloid neoplasms with erythroid predominance, limiting the diagnosis of acute myeloid leukemia to cases with ≥20% blasts in the bone marrow or peripheral blood. Although acute myeloid leukemia with ≥50% erythroid cells has historically been presumed to represent acute myeloid leukemia with myelodysplasia-related changes, this hypothesis has never been systematically examined. We sought to investigate the clinicopathologic, cytogenetic, and molecular features of acute myeloid leukemia with erythroid predominance to subclassify cases as defined by the 2016 WHO. We retrospectively identified patients with ≥50% erythroid precursors and either ≥20% bone marrow blasts or ≥20% peripheral blood blasts at the time of initial diagnosis at seven major academic centers. Laboratory and clinical data were obtained. Patients were then reclassified according to 2016 WHO guidelines. A matched control group was also obtained. We identified 146 patients with acute myeloid leukemia with erythroid predominance (62% M, average age: 62 y, range: 5-93 y). Of these, 91 were acute myeloid leukemia with myelodysplasia-related changes, 20 (14%) were therapy-related myeloid neoplasm, 23 (16%) acute myeloid leukemia, not otherwise specified, and ten acute myeloid leukemia with recurrent cytogenetic/molecular abnormalities. The bone marrow blast count ranged from 9-41%. There was no difference in survival for patients with erythroid predominance compared to patients with acute myeloid leukemia without erythroid proliferations. In a multivariable analysis, cytogenetic risk was the only significant predictor of survival. We find a significantly lower rate of FLT3 and RAS pathway alterations in acute myeloid leukemia with erythroid predominance compared to controls. Our study is one of the first to apply the 2016 WHO guidelines for classification of acute myeloid leukemia. We find acute myeloid leukemia with erythroid predominance is a heterogeneous group and that erythroid richness has no impact on overall survival.

De novo pure erythroid leukemia: refining the clinicopathologic and cytogenetic characteristics of a rare entity

Per the revised fourth edition World Health Organization classification of acute myeloid leukemia, pure erythroid leukemia is now the sole type of acute erythroid leukemia. The diagnosis of this rare entity is often challenging and the cytologic overlap with non-neoplastic (eg, megaloblastic anemia) and neoplastic entities (eg, other types of acute leukemia and non-hematopoietic malignancies) warrants a significant degree of clinical, laboratory, immunophenotypic, and genetic investigation. Given the limited number of reports of this rare and diagnostically challenging entity, we report detailed clinicopathologic characteristics from 15 patients, the largest series thus far, of primary de novo pure erythroid leukemia to provide further diagnostic insights into this entity and reveal strategies for making the diagnosis. We found that de novo pure erythroid leukemia is a disease of adults (median age 68 years), exhibits a striking male predominance, is universally associated with an abnormal karyotype and has an exceedingly poor overall median survival of 1.4 months. Given the general inability of immunophenotypic markers to discriminate neoplastic from non-neoplastic erythroid proliferations, key features identified in this study to help establish the diagnosis of pure erythroid leukemia and exclude mimickers include circulating pronormoblasts, clear-cut dysplasia in erythroid, granulocytic, and/or megakaryocytic lineage, utilization of a broad immunophenotypic panel, TP53 immunohistochemical positivity, and identification of a complex, often highly complex, karyotype. Given the gravity of a diagnosis of de novo pure erythroid leukemia, it should be rendered with utmost confidence.

Re-evaluation of acute erythroid leukemia according to the 2016 WHO classification

In the recent update of WHO classification, the definition of myeloid neoplasms with erythroid predominance has been modified shifting the main criteria for calculating blast percentage from non-erythroid cells (NEC) to all nucleated marrow cells (ANC). Thus, the cases previously classified as erythroid/myeloid subtype of acute erythroid leukemia (AEL) based on the 2008 WHO will now be categorized either as myelodysplastic syndrome with excess blasts (MDS-EB) or acute myeloid leukemia, not otherwise specified (AML-NOS). However, the clinical significance of this new classification has not been demonstrated. Thus, we reviewed a leukemia database and reclassified 38 cases previously diagnosed as AEL, erythroid/myeloid subtype, with the consideration of 2016 revision criteria. Twenty seven (71%) of them had >20% blasts in NEC but less than 20% blasts in ANC, and 11 (29%) had >20% in both NEC and ANC. There was no significant difference in overall survivals (OS) among AEL, MDS-EB, and AML-NOS (non-erythroid predominance, NEP). However, AML with myelodysplasia-related changes showed significant shorter OS than AEL, MDS-EB and AML-NOS (NEP). Our results indicate that in myeloid neoplasm with erythroid predominance, patients with >20% blasts, of either NEC or ANC, share similar clinical laboratory features and survival outcomes with AML-NOS.

An analysis of 97 previously diagnosed de novo adult acute erythroid leukemia patients following the 2016 revision to World Health Organization classification

Background

The incidence of acute erythroid leukemia subtype (AEL) is rare, accounting for 5% of cases of acute myeloid leukemia (AML), and the outcome is dismal. However, in 2016 revision to the WHO classification, the subcategory of AEL has been removed. Myeloblasts are redefined as the percentage of total marrow cells, not non-erythroid cells. Therefore, the previously diagnosed AEL cases are currently diagnosed as AML or myelodyspalstic syndrome (MDS) according to new criteria.

Methods

We respectively reviewed cases of 97 de novo previously diagnosed AEL and all the patients were diagnosed as AML or MDS according to the new classification scheme, and then the clinical characteristics of these two subtypes were compared. Statistical analyses were performed by SPSS software version 18.0.

Results

The median age was 37 years-old, the two-thirds of previous AEL cases were diagnosed as MDS, and there was no obvious difference between two subtypes except for male/female ratio and age. Cytogenetic, rather than MDS/AML subtypes, can better represent the prognostic factor of previously diagnosed AEL patients. When the cytogenetic risk of patients belonged to MRC intermediate category and age were below 40 years-old in previous AEL cases, the patients who received induction chemotherapy without transplantation had a similar survival compared with the patients who underwent transplantation (3-year OS: 67.2% vs 68.5%).

Conclusions

Cytogenetic, rather than MDS/AML subtypes, can better represent the prognostic factor of previously diagnosed AEL patients. Transplantation was a better choice for those whose cytogenetic category was unfavorable.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12885-017-3528-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Pure erythroid leukemia

The category of acute erythroid leukemia was significantly revised in the recently published 2016 revision to the World Health Organization (WHO) classification of myeloid neoplasms. In the previous 2008 WHO classification, acute erythroid leukemia was categorized into two subtypes: erythroleukemia and pure erythroid leukemia (PEL), whereas in the 2016 WHO update, erythroleukemia was merged into myelodysplastic syndrome, and PEL becomes the only type of acute erythroid leukemia. PEL is a rare and aggressive form of acute leukemia whose biology remains poorly characterized. In this review, we discuss the clinicopathologic features, diagnosis, putative pathogenesis, and molecular biology of PEL, with an overview of novel concepts and future directions in this area.

The uniqueness of morphological features of pure erythroid leukemia in myeloid neoplasm with erythroid predominance: A reassessment using criteria revised in the 2016 World Health Organization classification

We reviewed 97 consecutive cases of myeloid neoplasm with erythroid predominance (MN-EP) between 2000 and 2015. Following 2016 WHO classification, MN-EP patients were classified into four groups. Eight pure erythroid leukemia (PEL) (including t-MN and AML-MRC morphologically fulfilled criteria for PEL) patients had dismal outcomes (median OS: 1 month) and showed more bone marrow fibrosis, worse performance status (PS) and higher serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) at diagnosis than the other groups. In the univariate analysis, risks of death in MN-EP patients included the morphologic features of PEL, very poor cytogenetic risk by IPSS-R, bone marrow fibrosis, leukocytosis, anemia, hypoalbuminemia, high LDH, and poor PS. In the multivariate analysis, independent predictors of death were morphologic features of PEL (adjusted hazards ratio [HR] 3.48, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.24–9.74, p = 0.018), very poor cytogenetic risk by IPSS-R (adjusted HR 2.73, 95% CI 1.22–6.10, p = 0.015), hypoalbuminemia (< 3.7 g/dl) (adjusted HR 2.33, 95% CI 1.10–4.91, p = 0.026) and high serum LDH (≥ 250 U/L) (adjusted HR 2.36, 95% CI 1.28–4.36, p = 0.006). Poor or unfavorable risk in different cytogenetic risk systems independently predicted death and UKMRC-R was the best model.

Erythroleukemia shares biological features and outcome with myelodysplastic syndromes with excess blasts: a rationale for its inclusion into future classifications of myelodysplastic syndromes

Erythroleukemia was considered an acute myeloid leukemia in the 2008 World Health Organization (WHO) classification and is defined by the presence of ≥50% bone marrow erythroblasts, having <20% bone marrow blasts from total nucleated cells but ≥20% bone marrow myeloblasts from nonerythroid cells. Erythroleukemia shares clinicopathologic features with myelodysplastic syndromes, especially with erythroid-predominant myelodysplastic syndromes (≥50% bone marrow erythroblasts). The upcoming WHO revision proposes to eliminate the nonerythroid blast cell count rule and to move erythroleukemia patients into the appropriate myelodysplastic syndrome category on the basis of the absolute blast cell count. We conducted a retrospective study of patients with de novo erythroleukemia and compared their clinico-biological features and outcome with those of de novo myelodysplastic syndromes, focusing on erythroid-predominant myelodysplastic syndromes. Median overall survival of 405 erythroid-predominant myelodysplastic syndromes without excess blasts was significantly longer than that observed in 57 erythroid-predominant refractory anemias with excess blasts-1 and in 59 erythroleukemias, but no significant difference was observed between erythroid-predominant refractory anemias with excess blasts-1 and erythroleukemias. In this subset of patients with ≥50% bone marrow erythroblasts and excess blasts, the presence of a high-risk karyotype defined by the International Prognostic Scoring System or by the Revised International Prognostic Scoring System was the main prognostic factor. In the same way, the survival of 459 refractory anemias with excess blasts-2, independently of having ≥20% bone marrow blasts from nonerythroid cells or not, was almost identical to the observed in 59 erythroleukemias. Interestingly, 11 low-blast count erythroleukemias with 5 to <10% bone marrow blasts from total nucleated cells showed similar survival than the rest of erythroleukemias. Our data suggest that de novo erythroleukemia is in the spectrum of myelodysplastic syndromes with excess blasts and support its inclusion into future classifications of myelodysplastic syndromes.

Acute erythroid leukemia with <20% bone marrow blasts is clinically and biologically similar to myelodysplastic syndrome with excess blasts

In acute erythroleukemia, erythroid/myeloid subtype, blasts usually comprise 5-19% of total bone marrow cells, similar to the myelodysplastic syndrome subtype refractory anemia with excess blasts; recent studies have raised the question if acute erythroleukemia should be considered as a myelodysplastic syndrome subtype. We reviewed 77 de novo acute erythroleukemia and 279 de novo refractory anemia with excess blasts from three large medical centers. Compared to refractory anemia with excess blasts, acute erythroleukemia patients had higher total bone marrow blasts, lower platelets, hemoglobin, and absolute neutrophil counts, with more patients being assigned a very-poor-karyotype risk and very-high Revised International Prognostic Scoring System score. Induction chemotherapy was administered to 55% of acute erythroleukemia patients, but was not associated with longer overall survival compared to acute erythroleukemia patients treated with lower-intensity therapies or supportive care (P=0.44). In multivariable analysis of all patients, Revised International Prognostic Scoring System very high (P<0.0001) or high (P=0.005) risk, but not a diagnosis of acute erythroleukemia (P=0.30), were independent risk factors for shorter overall survival. Our data show that acute erythroleukemia patients have similar risk-adjusted outcome to refractory anemia with excess blasts patients and do not appear to gain survival advantage with acute myeloid leukemia-type induction chemotherapy. These data suggest that acute erythroleukemia, erythroid/myeloid subtype with <20% blasts may be more appropriately classified as refractory anemia with excess blasts rather than as an acute myeloid leukemia subtype.

Considering Bone Marrow Blasts From Nonerythroid Cellularity Improves the Prognostic Evaluation of Myelodysplastic Syndromes

PURPOSE

WHO classification of myeloid malignancies is based mainly on the percentage of bone marrow (BM) blasts. This is considered from total nucleated cells (TNCs), unless there is erythroid-hyperplasia (erythroblasts ≥ 50%), calculated from nonerythroid cells (NECs). In these instances, when BM blasts are ≥ 20%, the disorder is classified as erythroleukemia, and when BM blasts are < 20%, as myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). In the latter, the percentage of blasts is considered from TNCs.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We assessed the percentage of BM blasts from TNCs and NECs in 3,692 patients with MDS from the Grupo Español de Síndromes Mielodisplásicos, 465 patients with erythroid hyperplasia (MDS-E) and 3,227 patients without erythroid hyperplasia. We evaluated the relevance of both quantifications on classification and prognostication.

RESULTS

By enumerating blasts systematically from NECs, 22% of patients with MDS-E and 12% with MDS from the whole series diagnosed within WHO categories with < 5% BM blasts, were reclassified into higher-risk categories and showed a poorer overall survival than did those who remained in initial categories (P = .006 and P = .001, respectively). Following WHO recommendations, refractory anemia with excess blasts (RAEB)-2 diagnosis is not possible in MDS-E, as patients with 10% to < 20% BM blasts from TNCs fulfill erythroleukemia criteria; however, by considering blasts from NECs, 72 patients were recoded as RAEB-2 and showed an inferior overall survival than did patients with RAEB-1 without erythroid hyperplasia. Recalculating the International Prognostic Scoring System by enumerating blasts from NECs in MDS-E and in the overall MDS population reclassified approximately 9% of lower-risk patients into higher-risk categories, which indicated the survival expected for higher-risk patients.

CONCLUSION

Regardless of the presence of erythroid hyperplasia, calculating the percentage of BM blasts from NECs improves prognostic assessment of MDS. This fact should be considered in future WHO classification reviews.

The 2016 revision to the World Health Organization classification of myeloid neoplasms and acute leukemia

The World Health Organization (WHO) classification of tumors of the hematopoietic and lymphoid tissues was last updated in 2008. Since then, there have been numerous advances in the identification of unique biomarkers associated with some myeloid neoplasms and acute leukemias, largely derived from gene expression analysis and next-generation sequencing that can significantly improve the diagnostic criteria as well as the prognostic relevance of entities currently included in the WHO classification and that also suggest new entities that should be added. Therefore, there is a clear need for a revision to the current classification. The revisions to the categories of myeloid neoplasms and acute leukemia will be published in a monograph in 2016 and reflect a consensus of opinion of hematopathologists, hematologists, oncologists, and geneticists. The 2016 edition represents a revision of the prior classification rather than an entirely new classification and attempts to incorporate new clinical, prognostic, morphologic, immunophenotypic, and genetic data that have emerged since the last edition. The major changes in the classification and their rationale are presented here.

Myelodysplastic syndromes following therapy with hypomethylating agents (HMAs): development of acute erythroleukemia may not influence assessment of treatment response

This study followed 28 patients with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) who showed a rise of bone marrow (BM) erythroids to ≥ 50% following three cycles (1-60) of hypomethylating agent (HMA) therapy. If BM blasts were calculated as a percentage of non-erythroids, 12 (42.9%) patients met the diagnostic criteria for acute erythroleukemia, erythroid/myeloid (AEL). However, none of the patients showed clonal cytogenetic evolution or new mutations. When compared to 47 de novo AEL patients, these 12 patients were less anemic and thrombocytopenic, had less complex karyotypes (p = 0.044) and showed a longer survival, either calculated from diagnosis (p < 0.001) or from the time of AEL (p = 0.005). These findings illustrate that ≥ 50% erythroids may appear in BM post-HMA therapy, likely a combination of reduction of BM granulocytes (p < 0.001) and promotion of normal or abnormal erythroid proliferation. Enumeration of blasts as a percentage of non-erythroid cells may lead to a diagnosis of AEL and mis-interpretation as disease progression.

Acute Erythroleukemias, Acute Megakaryoblastic Leukemias, and Reactive Mimics: A Guide to a Number of Perplexing Entities

OBJECTIVES

At the 2013 Society for Hematopathology/European Association for Hematopathology Workshop, 36 cases were submitted to the session that covered acute erythroid leukemia (AEL), acute megakaryoblastic leukemia (AMKL), and reactive mimics.

METHODS

Cases were reviewed by the session chairs and workshop panel to reach a consensus diagnosis.

RESULTS

For acute erythroleukemia, erythroid/myeloid type, discussion acknowledged overlapping features between AEL and myelodysplastic syndromes. Cases submitted as pure erythroid leukemia had distinctive morphology and immunophenotype, complex karyotypes, and aggressive clinical behavior, illustrating certain diagnostic features not currently captured by the current World Health Organization (WHO) definition. In Down syndrome, there were striking similarities between transient abnormal myelopoiesis and AMKL. Most cases of AMKL in adults would be classified as acute myeloid leukemia with myelodysplasia-related changes according to the WHO classification, but this approach deemphasizes their unique clinical, morphologic, and immunophenotypic features.

CONCLUSIONS

The broad spectrum of cases illustrated the difficulties and complex issues involved in establishing a diagnosis of these entities and the need for better disease definitions.

Reclassifying myelodysplastic syndromes: what's where in the new WHO and why

A revision to the 4th edition of the WHO Classification of myelodysplastic syndromes (MDSs), originally published in 2008, is expected in mid-2016. Based on recommendations of a Clinical Advisory Committee, the revision will aim to incorporate new discoveries in MDS that impact existing disease categories. Although the basic diagnostic principles of the WHO classification remain unchanged, several changes to the classification are proposed. All revisions are considered preliminary until the actual publication of the monograph and online document. Proposals for change include abandoning the routine use of "refractory anemia/cytopenia" in the various disease names, including the prognostic significance of gene mutations in MDS, revising the diagnostic criteria for MDS entities with ring sideroblasts based on the detection of SF3B1 mutations, modifying the cytogenetic criteria for MDS with isolated del(5q), reclassifying most cases of the erythroid/myeloid type of acute erythroleukemia, and recognizing the familial link in some cases of MDS. This review will provide details of the major proposed changes as well as rationale for the revisions.

Erythroleukemia and Its Differential Diagnosis

Acute erythroid leukemias encompass 2 main subtypes: acute erythroleukemia (erythroid/myeloid subtype) and pure erythroid leukemia. This article reviews the main clinicopathologic features of the acute erythroid leukemias and the criteria used to diagnose them. In this article, the differential diagnosis between acute erythroid leukemias and their mimics is discussed and helpful morphologic clues and diagnostic tests that help arrive at the correct diagnosis are provided. The appropriate application of diagnostic criteria, including ancillary testing, such as immunophenotyping, cytogenetics, and molecular genetic testing, is essential to categorize bone marrow erythroid proliferations.

CD105 (endoglin) is highly overexpressed in a subset of cases of acute myeloid leukemias

OBJECTIVES

To assess CD105 (endoglin) expression in 119 acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and 13 control cases using immunohistochemistry.

METHODS

CD105 expression was assessed retrospectively by using immunohistochemistry in bone marrow specimens.

RESULTS

CD105 was strongly and diffusely positive in all 9 (100%) AMLs with t(15;17)(q24.1;q21.2), 2 (100%) AMLs with t(8;21)(q22;q22), 1 (100%) AML with t(6;9)(p23;q34), 7 (28%) of 25 AMLs with myelodysplasia-related changes, 1 (33%) of 3 therapy-related AMLs, 3 (16%) of 19 AMLs unclassifiable, 1 (14%) of 7 AMLs with inv(16)(p13.1q22), and 5 (11%) of 45 AMLs not otherwise specified. Uninvolved bone marrow in these cases showed no CD105 expression by erythroid precursors, megakaryocytes, or endothelial or stromal cells. Two of 13 control bone marrow specimens showed partial CD105 positivity in myeloid cells. In 21 strongly CD105+ AML cases tested for the IDH2 mutation, 9 (42%) were mutated (P = .004).

CONCLUSIONS

These data suggest that CD105 could be a therapeutic target in a subset of patients with AML.