1
|
Andersén Å, Carpentsier B, Berglund E, Carlsson M. Healthcare professionals' perceptions of the contributions of rehabilitation coordinators to patients in Swedish psychiatric care: a qualitative descriptive study. BMC Psychiatry 2024; 24:437. [PMID: 38867196 PMCID: PMC11167818 DOI: 10.1186/s12888-024-05895-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2023] [Accepted: 06/06/2024] [Indexed: 06/14/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Rehabilitation coordinators have gradually been introduced into Swedish psychiatric care to support individuals on sick leave to return-to-work or enter work. AIM To explore healthcare professionals' perspectives on the contributions a rehabilitation coordinator can make to patients in psychiatric care. MATERIALS AND METHODS A descriptive qualitative design was used, and data were collected through interviews. Twelve healthcare professionals in psychiatric care participated in individual semi-structured interviews. Data were analysed using thematic analysis. RESULTS An overarching theme evolved: "The rehabilitation coordinator promotes security and reduces stress in the vocational rehabilitation process", based on two themes: (1) "Adaptations and support based on the patient's needs" and (2) "Rehabilitation coordinator efforts as relevant for care". The themes, in turn, consist of six subthemes. CONCLUSIONS This study showed that healthcare professionals perceived employment as important for patients' health and well-being. Therefore, the rehabilitation coordination efforts were not only seen as beneficial for addressing patients' challenges and needs in managing the vocational rehabilitation process but also as an integral part of the patient's care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Åsa Andersén
- Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Uppsala University, Box 564, Uppsala, SE-751 22 UPPSALA, Sweden.
| | - Beatrice Carpentsier
- Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Uppsala University, Box 564, Uppsala, SE-751 22 UPPSALA, Sweden
| | - Erik Berglund
- Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Uppsala University, Box 564, Uppsala, SE-751 22 UPPSALA, Sweden
- Division of Insurance Medicine, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, SE-171 77, Sweden
| | - Maria Carlsson
- Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Uppsala University, Box 564, Uppsala, SE-751 22 UPPSALA, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Svärd V, Arapovic Johansson Z, Holmlund L, Hellman T, Kwak L, Björk Brämberg E. Collaboration in the return-to-work process after sick leave due to common mental disorders: a qualitative study of stakeholders' views on goals and roles. BMC Public Health 2024; 24:1567. [PMID: 38862931 PMCID: PMC11165787 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-024-19063-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2023] [Accepted: 06/05/2024] [Indexed: 06/13/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study explores how the goals of collaboration in the return-to-work (RTW) process for people with common mental disorders are described by the stakeholders involved, and how they experience stakeholders' roles and responsibilities in relation to these goals. METHODS Interviews were conducted with 41 participants from three Swedish regions. Nine of the participants were workers, six employer representatives, four occupational health professionals, four social insurance officers, 18 RTW coordinators and five physicians. Thematic analysis was conducted. RESULTS Three main themes and overarching goals when collaborating on RTW were identified. In the first theme, 'creating an informative environment', all stakeholders emphasised clear roles and responsibilities. The second theme, 'striving for consensus in an environment of negotiations', addressed negotiations about when and how to collaborate, on what and with whom, and reveal different views on stakeholders' goals, roles and responsibilities in collaboration. The third theme identified goals for 'creating a supportive environment' for both workers and other stakeholders. Coordinators are found to have an important role in achieving a supportive environment, and in neutralising power imbalances between workers and their employers and social insurance officers. CONCLUSIONS Competing goals and priorities were identified as hindering successful collaboration, contributing to a spectrum of complex versus easy RTW collaboration. This study suggests some basic conditions for achieving a collaborative arena that is neutral in terms of power balance, where all stakeholders can share their views.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Veronica Svärd
- Department of Social Work, School of Social Sciences, Södertörn University, Huddinge, SE-141 89, Sweden.
- Division of Insurance Medicine, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, SE-171 77, Sweden.
| | - Zana Arapovic Johansson
- Unit of Intervention and Implementation Research for Worker Health, Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, SE-171 77, Sweden
| | - Lisa Holmlund
- Unit of Intervention and Implementation Research for Worker Health, Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, SE-171 77, Sweden
- Division of Occupational Therapy, Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet, Huddinge, SE-141 83, Sweden
| | - Therese Hellman
- Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Department of Medical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, SE-751 85, Sweden
- Department of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala, SE-751 85, Sweden
| | - Lydia Kwak
- Unit of Intervention and Implementation Research for Worker Health, Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, SE-171 77, Sweden
| | - Elisabeth Björk Brämberg
- Unit of Intervention and Implementation Research for Worker Health, Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, SE-171 77, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Lork K, Danielsson L, Larsson MEH, Holmgren K. Experiences of rehabilitation coordination among people on sick leave with mental health problems. Scand J Prim Health Care 2024:1-14. [PMID: 38833374 DOI: 10.1080/02813432.2024.2361242] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2023] [Accepted: 05/24/2024] [Indexed: 06/06/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Return to work often requires collaboration between different stakeholders. Rehabilitation coordination is a resource in coordinating efforts during sick leave to facilitate return to work. The purpose of the present study was to describe how people at risk for sick leave or on sick leave with mental health problems experienced rehabilitation coordination. MATERIALS AND METHOD The study had a qualitative approach using qualitative content analysis as described by Graneheim and Lundman. Eleven semi-structured interviews were conducted with persons at risk for sick leave or on sick leave due to mental health problems and with experience of rehabilitation coordination. RESULTS The participants experience of rehabilitation coordination were described by the overarching theme Building a bridge with many bricks between the person and society. The theme was formed by four categories and eleven subcategories reflecting the complex context of rehabilitation coordination. The categories were Collaboration in a new setting, Unburdened within certain limits, The way back to work is a joint project and Recognising challenges beyond the person. CONCLUSIONS People with mental health problems experienced rehabilitation coordination as a meaningful link between healthcare and work. However, rehabilitation coordination needs to be more recognised within healthcare to increase accessibility. It seems important that interventions are directed not only towards the person, but also include the workplace for a sustainable return to work.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kristin Lork
- Department of Health and Rehabilitation, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Louise Danielsson
- Department of Health and Rehabilitation, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Maria E H Larsson
- Department of Health and Rehabilitation, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Kristina Holmgren
- Department of Health and Rehabilitation, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Shaw E, Nunns M, Spicer SG, Lawal H, Briscoe S, Melendez‐Torres GJ, Garside R, Liabo K, Coon JT. What is the volume, quality and characteristics of evidence relating to the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of multi-disciplinary occupational health interventions aiming to improve work-related outcomes for employed adults? An evidence and gap map of systematic reviews. CAMPBELL SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS 2024; 20:e1412. [PMID: 38751859 PMCID: PMC11094349 DOI: 10.1002/cl2.1412] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/18/2024]
Abstract
Background In the UK, tens of millions of working days are lost due to work-related ill health every year, costing billions of pounds. The role of Occupational Health (OH) services is vital in helping workers to maintain employment when they encounter injury or illness. OH providers traditionally rely on a clinical workforce to deliver these services, particularly doctors and nurses with OH qualifications. However, the increasing demand for OH services is unlikely to be met in the future using this traditional model, due to the declining number of OH-trained doctors and nurses in the UK. Multi-disciplinary models of OH delivery, including a more varied range of healthcare and non-healthcare professionals, could provide a way to meet this new demand for OH services. There is a need to identify collaborative models of OH service delivery and review their effectiveness on return-to work outcomes. There is an existing pool of systematic review evidence evaluating workplace based, multi-disciplinary OH interventions, but it is difficult to identify which aspects of the content and/or delivery of these interventions may be associated with improved work-related outcomes. Objectives The aim of this evidence and gap map (EGM) was to provide an overview of the systematic review evidence that evaluates the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of multi-disciplinary OH interventions intending to improve work-related outcomes. Search Methods In June 2021 we searched a selection of bibliographic databases and other academic literature resources covering a range of relevant disciplines, including health care and business studies, to identify systematic review evidence from a variety of sectors of employment. We also searched Google Search and a selection of topically relevant websites and consulted with stakeholders to identify reports already known to them. Searches were updated in February 2023. Selection Criteria Systematic reviews needed to be about adults (16 years or over) in employment, who have had absence from work for any medical reason. Interventions needed to be multi-disciplinary (including professionals from different backgrounds in clinical and non-clinical professions) and designed to support employees and employers to manage health conditions in the workplace and/or to help employees with health conditions retain and/or return to work following medical absence. Effectiveness needed to be measured in terms of return to work, work retention or measures of absence, or economic evaluation outcomes. These criteria were applied to the title and abstract and full text of each systematic review independently by two reviewers, with disagreements resolved through discussion. We awarded each systematic review a rating of 'High', 'Medium' or 'Low' relevance to indicate the extent to which the populations, interventions and their contexts synthesised within the review were consistent with our research question. We also recorded the number of primary studies included within each of the 'High' and 'Medium' reviews that were relevant to research question using the same screening process applied at review level. Data Collection and Analysis Summary data for each eligible review was extracted. The quality of the systematic reviews, rated as 'High' or 'Medium' relevance following full text screening, was appraised using the AMSTAR-2 quality appraisal tool. All data were extracted by one reviewer and checked by a second, with disagreements being settled through discussion. Summary data for all eligible systematic reviews were tabulated and described narratively. The data extracted from reviews of 'High' and 'Medium' relevance was imported into EPPI-Mapper software to create an EGM. Stakeholder Involvement We worked alongside commissioners and policy makers from the Department of Health and Social Care (DHSC) and Department of Work and Pensions (DWP), OH personnel, and people with lived experience of accessing OH services themselves and/or supporting employees to access OH services. Individuals contributed to decision making at all stages of the project. This ensured our EGM reflects the needs of individuals who will use it. Main Results We identified 98 systematic reviews that contained relevant interventions, which involved a variety of professionals and workplaces, and which measured effectiveness in terms of return to work (RTW). Of these, we focused on the 30 reviews where the population and intervention characteristics within the systematic reviews were considered to be of high or medium relevance to our research questions. The 30 reviews were of varying quality, split evenly between High/Moderate quality and Low/Critically-Low quality ratings. We did not identify any relevant systematic review evidence on any other work-related outcome of interest. Interventions were heterogenous, both within and across included systematic reviews. The EGM is structured according to the health condition experienced by participants, and the effectiveness of the interventions being evaluated, as reported within the included systematic reviews. It is possible to view (i) the quality and quantity of systematic review evidence for a given health condition, (ii) how review authors assessed the effectiveness or cost-effectiveness of the interventions evaluated. The EGM also details the primary studies relevant to our research aim included within each review. Authors’ Conclusions This EGM map highlights the array of systematic review evidence that exists in relation to the effectiveness or cost-effectiveness of multi-disciplinary, workplace-based OH interventions in supporting RTW. This evidence will allow policy makers and commissioners of services to determine which OH interventions may be most useful for supporting different population groups in different contexts. OH professionals may find the content of the EGM useful in identifying systematic review evidence to support their practice. The EGM also identifies where systematic review evidence in this area is lacking, or where existing evidence is of poor quality. These may represent areas where it may be particularly useful to conduct further systematic reviews.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabeth Shaw
- Exeter Policy Research Programme Evidence Review Facility, Faculty of Health and Life SciencesUniversity of ExeterExeterUK
| | - Michael Nunns
- Exeter Policy Research Programme Evidence Review Facility, Faculty of Health and Life SciencesUniversity of ExeterExeterUK
| | - Stuart G. Spicer
- NIHR Applied Research CollaborationUniversity of PlymouthPlymouthUK
| | - Hassanat Lawal
- Exeter Policy Research Programme Evidence Review Facility, Faculty of Health and Life SciencesUniversity of ExeterExeterUK
| | - Simon Briscoe
- Exeter Policy Research Programme Evidence Review Facility, Faculty of Health and Life SciencesUniversity of ExeterExeterUK
| | - G. J. Melendez‐Torres
- Exeter Policy Research Programme Evidence Review Facility, Faculty of Health and Life SciencesUniversity of ExeterExeterUK
| | - Ruth Garside
- Exeter Policy Research Programme Evidence Review Facility, Faculty of Health and Life SciencesUniversity of ExeterExeterUK
| | - Kristin Liabo
- Exeter Policy Research Programme Evidence Review Facility, Faculty of Health and Life SciencesUniversity of ExeterExeterUK
| | - Jo Thompson Coon
- Exeter Policy Research Programme Evidence Review Facility, Faculty of Health and Life SciencesUniversity of ExeterExeterUK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Mustard CA, Orchard C, Dobson KG, Carnide N, Smith PM. The adequacy of workplace accommodation and the incidence of permanent employment separations after a disabling work injury or illness. Scand J Work Environ Health 2024; 50:208-217. [PMID: 38445410 PMCID: PMC11117718 DOI: 10.5271/sjweh.4149] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2023] [Indexed: 03/07/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study aimed to estimate the influence of the adequacy of employer accommodations of health impairments in predicting permanent separation from the employment relationship in a cohort of workers disabled by a work-related injury or illness. METHODS The study used data from a retrospective, observational cohort of 1793 Ontario workers who participated in an interviewer-administered survey 18 months following a disabling injury or illness. The relative risks (RR) of a permanent employment separation associated with inadequate employer accommodations were estimated using inverse probability of treatment weights to reduce confounding. RESULTS Over the 18-month follow-up, the incidence of permanent separation was 30.1/100, with 49.2% of separations related to health status. Approximately 51% of participants experiencing a separation were exposed to inadequate workplace accommodations, compared to 27% of participants in continuing employment. The propensity score adjusted RR of a health-related separation associated with inadequate accommodation was substantial [RR 2.72; 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.20-3.73], greater than the RR of separations not related to health (RR 1.68; 95% CI 1.38-2.21). CONCLUSIONS Incidence of permanent separation in this cohort of Ontario labor force participants was approximately two times more frequent than would be expected. The adequacy of employer accommodation was a strong determinant of the risk of permanent separation. These findings emphasize the potential for strengthened workplace accommodation practices in this setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cameron A Mustard
- Institute for Work & Health, 400 University Ave, Suite 1800, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M5G 1S5.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Berglund E, Friberg E, Engblom M, Svärd V. Physicians' experience of and collaboration with return-to-work coordinators in healthcare: a cross-sectional study in Sweden. Disabil Rehabil 2023:1-9. [PMID: 37772755 DOI: 10.1080/09638288.2023.2261851] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2022] [Accepted: 09/15/2023] [Indexed: 09/30/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Return-to-work coordinators (RTWCs) give people on sick leave individualized support and coordinate between different stakeholders, including physicians. The aim of this study was to explore physicians' experience of RTWCs and investigate factors that influence how much physicians collaborate with RTWCs, or refer patients to them, in primary, orthopaedic, and psychiatric care clinics. MATERIALS AND METHODS Of the 1229 physicians responding to a questionnaire, 629 physicians who had access to a RTWC in their clinic answered to questions about collaborating with RTWCs. RESULTS Among physicians who had access to a RTWC, 29.0% collaborated with a RTWC at least once a week. Physicians with a more favourable experience of RTWCs reported more frequent collaboration (adjusted OR 2.92, 95% CI 2.06-4.15). Physicians also collaborated more often with RTWCs if they reported to often deal with problematic sick-leave cases, patients with multiple diagnoses affecting work ability, and conflicts with patients over sickness certification. CONCLUSIONS Physicians who had more problematic sick-leave cases to handle and a favourable experience of RTWCs, also reported collaborating more often with RTWCs. The results indicate that RTWCs' facilitation of contacts with RTW stakeholders and improvements in the sickness certification process may be of importance for physicians.Implications for RehabilitationThis study of physicians' experience of collaborating with return-to-work coordinators (RTWCs) observes that physicians reported more collaboration with or referrals to coordinators if they had a favourable experience of coordinators.The results indicate that physicians report more collaboration with or referrals to RTWCs if they had more problematic sick-leave cases to handle in the clinic.These findings imply that it might be possible to increase the collaboration between physicians and RTWCs in clinical settings by managing factors of importance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erik Berglund
- Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Division of Insurance Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Emilie Friberg
- Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Division of Insurance Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Monika Engblom
- Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Division of Insurance Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Veronica Svärd
- Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Division of Insurance Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Medical Unit Social Work in Health, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Social Sciences, Division of Social Work, Södertörn University, Huddinge, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Svärd V, Jannas S. Organisational prerequisites for coordinating the return-to-work process for people with multimorbidity and psychosocial difficulties. Disabil Rehabil 2023; 45:2915-2924. [PMID: 36006799 DOI: 10.1080/09638288.2022.2114019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/25/2021] [Revised: 06/24/2022] [Accepted: 08/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The return-to-work (RTW) process for people with multimorbidity and psychosocial difficulties can be complicated. This study explores the organisational prerequisites for coordinating these patients' RTW processes from the perspective of coordinators in different clinical areas in Sweden. MATERIAL AND METHODS Six focus group interviews were conducted with 24 coordinators working in primary healthcare (PHC), psychiatric and orthopaedic clinics. The data were analysed thematically, inspired by organisation theory. RESULTS Coordinators described varying approaches to people with multimorbidity and psychosocial difficulties, with more hesitancy among PHC coordinators, who were perceived by other coordinators as hindering patient flows between clinical areas. Most organisational barriers to RTW were identified in the healthcare sector. These were long waiting times, physicians drawing up inadequate RTW plans, coordinators being involved late in the sickness absence process, and lack of rehabilitation programmes for people with multimorbidity. The barriers in relation to organisations such as Social Insurance Agency and Employment Services were caused by regulations and differing perspectives, priorities, and procedures. CONCLUSION Our findings indicate what is needed to improve the RTW process for patients with complex circumstances: better working conditions, steering, and guidelines; shorter waiting times; and a willingness among coordinators from different clinical areas to collaborate around patients. Implications for rehabilitationRTW coordinators need sufficient physical and psychosocial working conditions as well as clear leadership.In order to avoid inequalities in access to RTW support, better systems are needed to identify patients who would benefit from rehabilitation and RTW coordination.There is a need for multilevel collaboration between clinical areas so that patients with multiple healthcare contacts and prolonged sickness absence can obtain support during the RTW process.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Veronica Svärd
- Division of Insurance Medicine, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Social Work, Södertörn University, Huddinge, Sweden
- Medical Unit Social Work in Health, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Sandra Jannas
- Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Centre for Psychiatry Research, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Svärd V, Berglund E, Björk Brämberg E, Gustafsson N, Engblom M, Friberg E. Coordinators in the return-to-work process: Mapping their work models. PLoS One 2023; 18:e0290021. [PMID: 37561796 PMCID: PMC10414594 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0290021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2022] [Accepted: 07/31/2023] [Indexed: 08/12/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE In recent decades, many countries have implemented return-to-work coordinators to combat high rates of sickness absence and insufficient collaboration in the return-to-work process. The coordinators should improve communication and collaboration between stakeholders in the return-to-work process for people on sickness absence. How they perform their daily work remains unexplored, and we know little about to what extent they collaborate and perform other work tasks to support people on sickness absence. This study examines which work models return-to-work coordinators use in primary healthcare, psychiatry and orthopaedics in Sweden. METHODS A questionnaire was sent to all 82 coordinators in one region (89% response rate) with questions about the selection of patients, individual patient support, healthcare collaboration, and external collaboration. Random forest classification analysis was used to identify the models. RESULTS Three work models were identified. In model A, coordinators were more likely to select certain groups of patients, spend more time in telephone than in face-to-face meetings, and collaborate fairly much. In Model B there was less patient selection and much collaboration and face-to-face meetings. Model C involved little patient selection, much telephone contact and very little collaboration. Model A was more common in primary healthcare, model C in orthopaedics, while model B was distributed equally between primary healthcare and psychiatry. CONCLUSION The work models correspond differently to the coordinator's assignments of supporting patients and collaborating with healthcare and other stakeholders. The differences lie in how much they actively select patients, how much they collaborate, and with whom. Their different distribution across clinical contexts indicates that organisational demands influence how work models evolve in practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Veronica Svärd
- Unit of Social Work, Department of Social Sciences, Södertörn University, Huddinge, Sweden
- Division of Insurance Medicine, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Medical Unit Social Work in Health, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Erik Berglund
- Division of Insurance Medicine, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Elisabeth Björk Brämberg
- Unit of Intervention and Implementation Research for Worker Health, Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Niklas Gustafsson
- Division of Insurance Medicine, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Monika Engblom
- Division of Insurance Medicine, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Emilie Friberg
- Division of Insurance Medicine, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Sullivan V, Wilson MN, Gross DP, Jensen OK, Shaw WS, Steenstra IA, Hayden JA. Expectations for Return to Work Predict Return to Work in Workers with Low Back Pain: An Individual Participant Data (IPD) Meta-Analysis. JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL REHABILITATION 2022; 32:575-590. [PMID: 35152369 DOI: 10.1007/s10926-022-10027-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/01/2022] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
Purpose Low back pain is associated with disability and lost productivity due to inability of workers to return to work. Personal recovery expectation beliefs may be associated with return to work outcomes in those with low back pain at high risk for chronic disability. We aimed to (1) assess whether workers' expectations for return to work, following a low back pain episode, are associated with subsequent return to work; and (2) explore the relationships between return to work expectations and other prognostic factors in their association with work outcomes.Methods We conducted an Individual Participant Data (IPD) meta-analysis using data from five prospective cohort studies identified by a Cochrane prognostic factor review. A one-stage IPD meta-analysis approach was applied. Multi-level mixed effects models were used to determine the unadjusted and adjusted associations between expectations and return to work (logistic regression) and time to return to work (parametric survival models with Weibull distribution).Results The final dataset included 2302 participants. Positive expectations for return to work were associated with return to work at follow-up in both unadjusted (Odds Ratio (OR) 2.95; 95% Confidence Interval (CI) 2.21, 3.95) (n = 2071) and comprehensively adjusted (OR 2.01; 95% CI 1.46, 2.77) (n = 1109) models. Similar findings were identified for shorter length of time to return to work in both unadjusted (HR 2.40; 95% CI 2.09, 2.75) (n = 1156) and minimally adjusted (HR 2.43; 95% CI 2.12, 2.79) (n = 1154) models.Conclusions Results suggest workers with low expectations for return to work are at increased risk for long-term work disability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Victoria Sullivan
- Department of Community Health & Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada.
- Department of Psychiatry & Behavioural Neurosciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
| | - Maria N Wilson
- Department of Community Health & Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada
| | - Douglas P Gross
- Department of Physical Therapy, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
| | - Ole Kudsk Jensen
- Spine Center, University Research Clinic for Innovative Patient Pathways, Silkeborg Regional Hospital, Silkeborg, Denmark
| | - William S Shaw
- Division of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Departments of Medicine and Public Health Sciences, University of Connecticut School of Medicine, Farmington, CT, USA
| | - Ivan A Steenstra
- Epidemiologist, Director Program Evaluation & Research Outcomes, LifeWorks, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Jill A Hayden
- Department of Community Health & Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Tingulstad A, Meneses-Echavez J, Evensen LH, Bjerk M, Berg RC. Effectiveness of work-related interventions for return to work in people on sick leave: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Syst Rev 2022; 11:192. [PMID: 36064472 PMCID: PMC9446672 DOI: 10.1186/s13643-022-02055-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2022] [Accepted: 08/22/2022] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Long-term sick leave is a serious concern in developed countries and the cost of sickness absence and disability benefits cause major challenges for both the individual and society as a whole. Despite an increasing body of research reported by existing systematic reviews, there is uncertainty regarding the effect on return to work of workrelated interventions for workers with different diagnoses. The objective of this systematic review was to assess and summarize available research about the effects of work-related interventions for people on long-term sick leave and those at risk of long-term sick leave. METHODS We conducted a systematic review in accordance with international guidelines. Campbell Collaboration (Area: Social Welfare), Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Embase, Epistemonikos, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Scopus, and Sociological Abstracts were systematically searched in March 2021. Two authors independently screened the studies. We conducted risk of bias assessments and meta-analyses of the available evidence in randomized controlled trials (RCTs). The remaining comparisons were synthesized narratively. The certainty of evidence for each outcome was assessed. RESULTS We included 20 RCTs comprising 5753 participants at baseline from 4 different countries. The studies had generally low risk of bias. Our certainty in the effect estimates ranged from very low to moderate. Eight different interventions were identified. Meta-analysis revealed no statistically significant difference between multidisciplinary rehabilitation (MR) and usual care (US) (Risk Ratio [RR] 1.01; Confidence Interval [CI] 95% 0.70-1.48 at 12 months follow-up) and between MR and other active intervention (Risk Ratio [RR] 1.04; Confidence Interval [CI] 95% 0.86-1.25 at 12 months follow-up). Remaining intervention groups revealed marginal, or no effect compared to the control group. The results for the secondary outcomes (self-efficacy, symptom reduction, function, cost-effectiveness) showed varied and small effects in the intervention groups. CONCLUSION Overall, the present data showed no conclusive evidence of which work-related intervention is most effective for return to work. However, a handful of potential interventions exist, that may contribute to a foundation for future research. Our findings support the need for adequately powered and methodologically strong studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Jose Meneses-Echavez
- Division for Health Services, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.,Facultad de Cultura Fisica, Deporte y Recreación, Universidad Santo Tomás, Bogotá, Colombia
| | - Line Holtet Evensen
- Division for Health Services, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway
| | - Maria Bjerk
- Division for Health Services, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway
| | - Rigmor C Berg
- Division for Health Services, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.,Department of Community Medicine, University of Tromsø, Tromsø, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Holmlund L, Sandman L, Hellman T, Kwak L, Björk Brämberg E. Ethical aspects of the coordination of return-to-work among employees on sick leave due to common mental disorders: a qualitative study. Disabil Rehabil 2022:1-10. [PMID: 35676198 DOI: 10.1080/09638288.2022.2084779] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Identify ethical issues that arise in the coordination of return-to-work (RTW) among employees on sick leave due to common mental disorders (CMDs). MATERIAL AND METHODS 41 semi-structured individual interviews and one focus group interview with stakeholders (n = 46) involved in RTW: employees on sick leave due to CMDs, coordinators and physicians at primary health care centres, managers, representatives of the Swedish social insurance agency and occupational health services. A six-step thematic analysis focused on the ethical values and norms related to autonomy, privacy, resources and organization, and professional values. RESULTS Five themes were identified: (1) autonomous decision-making versus the risk of taking over, (2) employee rights versus restrictions to self-determination, (3) respect for employee privacy versus stakeholders' interests, (4) risk of unequal inclusion due to insufficient organizational structure and resources, (5) risk of unequal support due to unclear professional roles and responsibilities. CONCLUSION The main ethical issues are the risks of unequal access to and unequal support for the coordination of RTW. For the fair and equal provision of coordination, it is necessary to be transparent on how to prioritize the coordination of RTW for different patient groups, provide clarity about the coordinator's professional role, and facilitate ongoing boundary work between stakeholders. IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATIONUnfair and arbitrary criteria for inclusion to the coordination of RTW implicate risks of unequal access for the employee on sick leave due to CMDs.Unclear professional roles and responsibilities among stakeholders in the coordination of RTW implicate risks of unequal support for the employee on sick leave due to CMDs.Coordination of RTW should be transparently prioritized on policy and organisational levels to secure fair and equal inclusion.The coordinator's professional role should be clearly defined to facilitate boundary work between stakeholders and improve the competence around the coordination of RTW.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lisa Holmlund
- Institute of Environmental Medicine, Unit of Intervention and Implementation Research for Worker Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Lars Sandman
- Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, National Centre for Priorities in Health, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Therese Hellman
- Institute of Environmental Medicine, Unit of Intervention and Implementation Research for Worker Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.,Department of Medical Sciences, Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Lydia Kwak
- Institute of Environmental Medicine, Unit of Intervention and Implementation Research for Worker Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Elisabeth Björk Brämberg
- Institute of Environmental Medicine, Unit of Intervention and Implementation Research for Worker Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Fauser D, Zeuner AK, Zimmer JM, Golla A, Schmitt N, Mau W, Bethge M. Work ability score as predictor of rehabilitation, disability pensions and death? A German cohort study among employees with back pain. Work 2022; 73:719-728. [PMID: 35431217 DOI: 10.3233/wor-210987] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Sickness absence, disability pensions, and use of healthcare due to disabling back pain are a high economic burden in Germany. Assessment are needed to identify employees who are likely to need intensive support. OBJECTIVE The cohort study examined whether rehabilitation, disability pensions and death can be predicted by a simple self-reported rating of work ability in employees with back pain in Germany. METHODS Employees aged 45 to 59 years who reported back pain in the last 3 months completed the Work Ability Score in 2017 (0-10 points). Individual scores were categorized into poor (0-5 points), moderate (6-7) and at least good (8-10) work ability. Outcomes were extracted from administrative records covering the period until the end of 2018. Proportional hazard models were fitted to determine the prognostic benefit of the Work Ability Score. RESULTS Data for 6,917 participants were included (57.8% women). The median follow-up time was 20 months. Of the participants, 52.1% had a good or excellent, 27.7% a moderate, and 20.2% a poor Work Ability Score. During follow-up, 548 persons were granted rehabilitation measures, 57 persons disability pensions, and 23 died. Fully adjusted analyses showed an increased risk of a rehabilitation measure (hazard ratio = 2.65; 95% CI 2.11; 3.34) and a disability pension (HR = 4.12; 95% CI 2.02; 8.39) in employees with poor work ability. A premature death was not associated with poor work ability. CONCLUSIONS The Work Ability Score is a potential tool to identify individuals, reporting back pain, with an increased risk of health-related early retirement and work disability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Fauser
- Institute for Social Medicine and Epidemiology, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Ann-Kathrin Zeuner
- Institute for Social Medicine and Epidemiology, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Julia-Marie Zimmer
- Institute for Rehabilitation Medicine, Interdisciplinary Centre of Health Sciences, Medical Faculty, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale), Germany
| | - André Golla
- Institute for Rehabilitation Medicine, Interdisciplinary Centre of Health Sciences, Medical Faculty, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale), Germany
| | - Nadine Schmitt
- Institute for Rehabilitation Medicine, Interdisciplinary Centre of Health Sciences, Medical Faculty, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale), Germany
| | - Wilfried Mau
- Institute for Rehabilitation Medicine, Interdisciplinary Centre of Health Sciences, Medical Faculty, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale), Germany
| | - Matthias Bethge
- Institute for Social Medicine and Epidemiology, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Coordination and Perceived Support for Return to Work: A Cross-Sectional Study among Patients in Swedish Healthcare. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2022; 19:ijerph19074040. [PMID: 35409721 PMCID: PMC8997974 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19074040] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2022] [Revised: 03/21/2022] [Accepted: 03/26/2022] [Indexed: 12/02/2022]
Abstract
Background: Receiving support from a return-to-work (RTW) coordinator (RTWC) may be beneficial for people on long-term sick leave. The aim of this study was to investigate whether the number of contacts with an RTWC and their involvement in designing rehabilitation plans for the patients were associated with perceiving support for RTW, emotional response to the RTWC, and healthcare utilization. Methods: In this cross-sectional study, 274 patients who had recently been in contact with an RTWC in Swedish primary or psychiatric care answered questions regarding their interaction with an RTWC, perceived support for RTW, and emotional response to the RTWC. Results: Having more contact with an RTWC was associated with perceiving more support in the RTW process (adjusted OR 4.14, 95% CI 1.49–11.47). RTWC involvement in designing a rehabilitation plan for the patient was associated with perceiving more support in the RTW process from an RTWC and having a more positive emotional response to the RTWC. Conclusions: From the patient’s perspective, this study indicates that the involvement of an RTWC and receiving a rehabilitation plan that an RTWC has helped to design might be perceived as important in the RTW process.
Collapse
|
14
|
Leiva R, Rochaix L, Kiefer N, Dupont JCK. Evaluating the Impact of Intensive Case Management for Severe Vocational Injuries on Work Incapacity and Costs. JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL REHABILITATION 2021; 31:807-821. [PMID: 33704657 PMCID: PMC8558282 DOI: 10.1007/s10926-021-09967-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/18/2021] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
Purpose This study investigates the impact of an intensive case management program on sick leave days, permanent work incapacity levels and treatment costs for severe vocational injuries set up by the French National Insurance Fund in five health insurance districts. Methods The method employed relies on a four-step matching procedure combining Coarsened Exact Matching and Propensity Score Matching, based on an original administrative dataset. Average Treatment effects on the Treated were estimated using a parametric model with a large set of covariates. Results After one-year follow-up, workers in the treatment group had higher sickness absence rates, with 22 extra days, and the program led to 2.7 (95% CI 2.3-3.1) times more diagnoses of permanent work incapacity in the treatment group. With an estimated yearly operational cost of 2,722 € per treated worker, the average total extra treatment cost was 4,569 € for treated workers, which corresponds to a cost increase of 29.2% for the insurance fund. Conclusions The higher costs found for the treatment group are mainly due to longer sick leave duration for the moderate severity group, implying higher cash transfers in the form of one-off indemnities. Even though workers in the treated group have more diagnoses of permanent work incapacity, the difference of severity between groups is small. Our results on longer sick leave duration are partly to be explained by interactions between the case managers and the occupational physicians that encouraged patients to stay longer off-work for better recovery, despite the higher costs that this represented for the insurance fund and the well-documented adverse side effects of longer periods off-work.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rolando Leiva
- Hospinnomics (PSE - École d'Économie de Paris, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris - AP-HP) and UCL, London, UK.
| | - Lise Rochaix
- Hospinnomics (PSE - École d'Économie de Paris, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris - AP-HP), Paris, France
| | - Noémie Kiefer
- Hospinnomics (PSE - École d'Économie de Paris, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris - AP-HP), Paris, France
| | - Jean-Claude K Dupont
- Hospinnomics (PSE - École d'Économie de Paris, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris - AP-HP), Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Dol M, Varatharajan S, Neiterman E, McKnight E, Crouch M, McDonald E, Malachowski C, Dali N, Giau E, MacEachen E. Systematic Review of the Impact on Return to Work of Return-to-Work Coordinators. JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL REHABILITATION 2021; 31:675-698. [PMID: 33881671 DOI: 10.1007/s10926-021-09975-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/01/2021] [Indexed: 05/26/2023]
Abstract
Purpose We conducted a systematic review to understand the impact that return-to-work coordinators (RTWCs) have on return to work (RTW) outcomes for sick/injured workers. Methods MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Web of Science, and ABI Inform were searched from January 1, 2000 to September 16, 2020. Of 2,927 retrieved and screened citations, 14 quantitative articles fulfilled the eligibility and quality criteria. Quality assessment, data extraction, and evidence synthesis followed article screening. Results We focused on the impact of RTWCs for outcomes of work absence, RTW rates, quality of life, and cost-benefit. Our final synthesis included 14 articles. We found strong evidence that work absence duration was reduced when workers had face-to-face contact with a RTWC. As well, there was strong evidence linking face-to-face RTWC interventions with higher RTW rates and moderate evidence that this reduced intervention costs. RTWC interventions involving the identification of barriers and facilitators to RTW also showed promising results. However, only limited evidence was found that RTWCs improved quality of life for workers. Conclusions Our synthesis identifies key features of RTW interventions that improve RTW outcomes. Future high-quality research should measure long-term outcomes of RTWC interventions to evaluate sustainability and consider the nature of work. They should also focus on RTWC impact on worker quality of life assessments and for older workers and workers with chronic health conditions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Dol
- School of Public Health and Health Systems, University of Waterloo, 200 University Avenue West, Waterloo, ON, N2L 3G1, Canada
| | - S Varatharajan
- School of Public Health and Health Systems, University of Waterloo, 200 University Avenue West, Waterloo, ON, N2L 3G1, Canada
| | - E Neiterman
- School of Public Health and Health Systems, University of Waterloo, 200 University Avenue West, Waterloo, ON, N2L 3G1, Canada
| | - E McKnight
- School of Public Health and Health Systems, University of Waterloo, 200 University Avenue West, Waterloo, ON, N2L 3G1, Canada
| | - M Crouch
- School of Public Health and Health Systems, University of Waterloo, 200 University Avenue West, Waterloo, ON, N2L 3G1, Canada
| | - E McDonald
- School of Public Health and Health Systems, University of Waterloo, 200 University Avenue West, Waterloo, ON, N2L 3G1, Canada
| | - C Malachowski
- University of Ontario Institute of Technology, 2000 Simcoe St N, Oshawa, ON, L1G 0C5, Canada
| | - N Dali
- School of Public Health and Health Systems, University of Waterloo, 200 University Avenue West, Waterloo, ON, N2L 3G1, Canada
| | - E Giau
- School of Public Health and Health Systems, University of Waterloo, 200 University Avenue West, Waterloo, ON, N2L 3G1, Canada
| | - E MacEachen
- School of Public Health and Health Systems, University of Waterloo, 200 University Avenue West, Waterloo, ON, N2L 3G1, Canada.
- University of Ontario Institute of Technology, 2000 Simcoe St N, Oshawa, ON, L1G 0C5, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Patients' with Multimorbidity and Psychosocial Difficulties and Their Views on Important Professional Competence for Rehabilitation Coordinators in the Return-to-Work Process. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2021; 18:ijerph181910280. [PMID: 34639580 PMCID: PMC8507790 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph181910280] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/20/2021] [Revised: 09/20/2021] [Accepted: 09/28/2021] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
Coordinators may play a key role during the return-to-work (RTW) process for people on sickness absence. There are still few studies on the newly implemented rehabilitation coordinators (RECO) within Swedish healthcare, and none focus on their competence. The aim of this study was to explore how persons with multimorbidity and psychosocial difficulties describe the professional competence of the RECO they encountered during their RTW process. The study takes a relational and practical approach in defining professional competence, including both what professionals do and what they possess. Interviews with 12 people with multimorbidity and psychosocial difficulties who had encountered a RECO during their RTW process were analysed using thematic analysis. Six different themes were found: communicative and coordinating skills; advisory and guidance skills; engagement and advocacy skills; being persistent and flexible; being empathic and therapeutic; being professional and trustworthy. Most of these are found in research on RTW coordinators, but being persistent, and having advisory, guidance, advocacy and therapeutic skills have not been recognised as important competences previously. This study adds patients’ views on important professional competence that support the RTW process, which should be regarded in further developments of RECOs’ functions and their competence descriptions.
Collapse
|
17
|
Su H, Hopkins RO, Kamdar BB, May S, Dinglas VD, Johnson KL, Hosey M, Hough CL, Needham DM, Thompson HJ. Association of imbalance between job workload and functional ability with return to work in ARDS survivors. Thorax 2021; 77:123-128. [PMID: 33927021 DOI: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2020-216586] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2020] [Revised: 03/01/2021] [Accepted: 04/11/2021] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Inability to return to work (RTW) is common after acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Mismatch in an individual's job workload and his or her functional ability, termed work ability imbalance, is negatively associated with RTW, but has not been evaluated in ARDS survivors. OBJECT We examine associations between work ability imbalance at 6 months and RTW at 6 months and 12 months, as well as the ability to sustain employment in ARDS survivors. METHODS Previously employed participants from the ARDS Network Long-Term Outcomes Study (N=341) were evaluated. Pre-ARDS workload was determined based on the US Occupational Information Network classification. Post-ARDS functional ability was assessed using self-reported 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) physical functioning, social functioning and mental health subscales, and Mini-Mental State Examination. ARDS survivors were categorised into four work ability imbalance categories: none, psychosocial, physical, and both psychosocial and physical. RESULTS Almost 90% of ARDS survivors had a physical and/or psychosocial work ability imbalance at both 6-month and 12-month follow-up. Compared with survivors with no imbalance at 6 months, those with both physical and psychosocial imbalance had lower odds of RTW (6 months: OR=0.33, 95% CI=0.13 to 0.82; 12 months: OR=0.22, 95% CI=0.07 to 0.65). Thirty-eight (19%) of those who ever RTW were subsequently jobless at 12 months. CONCLUSION Interventions aimed at rebalancing ARDS survivors' work ability by addressing physical and psychosocial aspects of their functional ability and workload should be explored as part of efforts to improve RTW, maintain employment and reduce the financial impact of joblessness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Han Su
- School of Nursing, University of Washington Seattle Campus, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Ramona O Hopkins
- Psychology Department, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah, USA.,Neuroscience Center, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah, USA.,Pulmonary and Critical Care, Intermountain Medical Center, Murray, Utah, USA.,Center for Humanizing Critical Care, Intermountain Medical Center, Murray, Utah, USA
| | - Biren B Kamdar
- Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, Sleep Medicine and Physiology, University of California, San Diego, California, USA
| | - Susanne May
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Victor D Dinglas
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.,Outcomes After Critical Illness and Surgery (OACIS) Group, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Kurt L Johnson
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Megan Hosey
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.,Outcomes After Critical Illness and Surgery (OACIS) Group, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.,Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Catherine L Hough
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Dale M Needham
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.,Outcomes After Critical Illness and Surgery (OACIS) Group, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.,Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Hilaire J Thompson
- School of Nursing, University of Washington Seattle Campus, Seattle, Washington, USA.,Harborview Injury Prevention and Research Center, Seattle, Washington, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Holmlund L, Hellman T, Engblom M, Kwak L, Sandman L, Törnkvist L, Björk Brämberg E. Coordination of return-to-work for employees on sick leave due to common mental disorders: facilitators and barriers. Disabil Rehabil 2020; 44:3113-3121. [PMID: 33280451 DOI: 10.1080/09638288.2020.1855263] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To identify facilitators of and barriers to the coordination of return-to-work between the primary care services, the employee, and the employers from the perspective of coordinators and employees on sick leave due to common mental disorders (CMDs). MATERIAL AND METHODS Descriptive qualitative study. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with eighteen coordinators and nine employees on sick leave due to CMDs. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) was used as a starting point for the interview guides and in the thematic analysis of data. RESULTS The results show facilitators and barriers related to the CFIR domains "intervention characteristics," "outer setting," "inner setting," and "characteristics of individuals." Positive attitudes, an open dialogue in a three-party meeting, and a common ground for the sick leave process at the primary care centre facilitated coordination, while an unclear packaging, conflicts at the employee's workplace, and a lack of team-based work were examples of barriers. CONCLUSION The results indicate a need for the detailed packaging of coordination; formalization of coordinators' qualifications and levels of training; and acknowledgement of the role of organizational factors in the implementation of coordination. This is important to further develop and evaluate the efficacy of coordination.IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATIONPositive attitudes to coordination, an open dialogue in a three-party meeting, leadership engagement, routines for the return to work (RTW) process at the primary care centre, and collegial alliances were identified as facilitators.An unclear packaging of the intervention, conflicts at the employee's workplace, lack of team-based work, and lack of coordinator training were identified as barriers.A detailed intervention packaging adapted for the specific setting and formalization of coordinators' qualifications and training is necessary for coordination of RTW.Recognizing organizational factors were identified as being important for the implementation of coordination of RTW for persons on sick leave due to CMDs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lisa Holmlund
- Institute of Environmental Medicine, Unit of Intervention and Implementation Research for Worker Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Therese Hellman
- Institute of Environmental Medicine, Unit of Intervention and Implementation Research for Worker Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.,Department of Medical Sciences, Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Monika Engblom
- Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet and Academic Primary Health Care Centre, Region Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Lydia Kwak
- Institute of Environmental Medicine, Unit of Intervention and Implementation Research for Worker Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Lars Sandman
- Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, National Centre for Priorities in Health, Linköping university, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Lena Törnkvist
- Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet and Academic Primary Health Care Centre, Region Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Elisabeth Björk Brämberg
- Institute of Environmental Medicine, Unit of Intervention and Implementation Research for Worker Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.,Department of Public Health and Community Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Sormunen E, Ylisassi H, Mäenpää-Moilanen E, Remes J, Martimo KP. Co-operation in the prevention of work disability due to musculoskeletal disorders: A cross-sectional study among occupational health professionals in Finland. Work 2020; 67:697-708. [DOI: 10.3233/wor-203319] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Occupational health service (OHS) providers and their client organizations are obligated to collaborate in promoting health and work ability. Little is known how this multiprofessional co-operation is implemented in relation to the prevention of musculoskeletal disorders (MSD). OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate the working practices of co-operation among OHS professionals, and between the OHSs and workplaces. METHODS: In 2015 a web-based questionnaire was sent to 3900 OHS professionals in Finland. A total of 589 responded: 106 physicians, 322 nurses, 134 physiotherapists and 27 psychologists. RESULTS: The co-operation within OHS personnel was regarded to strengthen the processes to promote work ability of workers with MSD. Despite the positive expectations of co-operation, there is a problem of having enough time to put good ideas into practice. Four main possibilities to develop co-operation were identified: creating proactive working models with defined roles; increasing awareness of importance of early intervention models; implementing the principles of good OH practice; and adopting the knowledge of the latest information to promote work ability. CONCLUSIONS: Despite its recognized importance, co-operation both with OHS colleagues and with the workplaces was not always optimal. There is a need for defined roles and common proactive working models between each stakeholder for more effective co-operation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erja Sormunen
- Finnish Institute of Occupational Health, Helsinki, Finland
| | | | | | - Jouko Remes
- Finnish Institute of Occupational Health, Helsinki, Finland
| | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Camisa V, Gilardi F, Di Brino E, Santoro A, Vinci MR, Sannino S, Bianchi N, Mesolella V, Macina N, Focarelli M, Brugaletta R, Raponi M, Ferri L, Cicchetti A, Magnavita N, Zaffina S. Return on Investment (ROI) and Development of a Workplace Disability Management Program in a Hospital-A Pilot Evaluation Study. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2020; 17:ijerph17218084. [PMID: 33147861 PMCID: PMC7662934 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17218084] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2020] [Revised: 10/19/2020] [Accepted: 10/20/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
The progressive ageing of the working population and the increase in related chronic diseases tend to affect working capacity. The aim of this study was to evaluate a Workplace Disability Management Program (WDMP) within a pediatric hospital. Absenteeism due to healthcare workers’ (HCWs) pre- and post- WDMP and the related costs were used for the program evaluation. The Return on Investment (ROI), the Break-Even Analysis (BEA) and the value of the average annual productivity of HCWs who took advantage of the Disability Management (DM) interventions to assess the economic impact of the program, were also used. The HCWs enrolled in the program were 131 (approximately 4% of hospital staff), of which 89.7% females and with an average age of 50.4 years (SD ± 8.99). Sick leave days of the HCWs involved decreased by 66.6% in the year following the end of WDMP compared to the previous one (p < 0.001). The total estimated cost reduction of absenteeism is 427,896€ over a year. ROI was equal to 27.66€. BEA indicated that the break-even point was reached by implementing the program on 3.27 HCWs. The program evaluation demonstrated the particular effectiveness of the implemented WDMP model, acting positively on the variables that affect productivity and the limitation to work.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vincenzo Camisa
- Health Directorate, Occupational Medicine Service, Bambino Gesù Children’s Hospital IRCCS, 00165 Rome, Italy; (V.C.); (F.G.); (A.S.); (M.R.V.); (R.B.)
- Post-Graduate School of Occupational Health, Catholic University of Sacred Heart, 00168 Rome, Italy; (L.F.); (N.M.)
| | - Francesco Gilardi
- Health Directorate, Occupational Medicine Service, Bambino Gesù Children’s Hospital IRCCS, 00165 Rome, Italy; (V.C.); (F.G.); (A.S.); (M.R.V.); (R.B.)
| | - Eugenio Di Brino
- Graduate School of Health Economics and Management, Catholic University of Sacred Heart (ALTEMS), 00168 Rome, Italy; (E.D.B.); (A.C.)
| | - Annapaola Santoro
- Health Directorate, Occupational Medicine Service, Bambino Gesù Children’s Hospital IRCCS, 00165 Rome, Italy; (V.C.); (F.G.); (A.S.); (M.R.V.); (R.B.)
| | - Maria Rosaria Vinci
- Health Directorate, Occupational Medicine Service, Bambino Gesù Children’s Hospital IRCCS, 00165 Rome, Italy; (V.C.); (F.G.); (A.S.); (M.R.V.); (R.B.)
- Post-Graduate School of Occupational Health, Catholic University of Sacred Heart, 00168 Rome, Italy; (L.F.); (N.M.)
| | - Serena Sannino
- Health Directorate, Bambino Gesù Children’s Hospital IRCCS, 00165 Rome, Italy; (S.S.); (M.R.)
| | - Natalia Bianchi
- Nursing and Health Allied Professionals Service, Bambino Gesù Children’s Hospital IRCCS, 00165 Rome, Italy;
| | - Valentina Mesolella
- Human Resources Directorate, Bambino Gesù Children’s Hospital IRCCS, 00165 Rome, Italy; (V.M.); (N.M.); (M.F.)
| | - Nadia Macina
- Human Resources Directorate, Bambino Gesù Children’s Hospital IRCCS, 00165 Rome, Italy; (V.M.); (N.M.); (M.F.)
| | - Michela Focarelli
- Human Resources Directorate, Bambino Gesù Children’s Hospital IRCCS, 00165 Rome, Italy; (V.M.); (N.M.); (M.F.)
| | - Rita Brugaletta
- Health Directorate, Occupational Medicine Service, Bambino Gesù Children’s Hospital IRCCS, 00165 Rome, Italy; (V.C.); (F.G.); (A.S.); (M.R.V.); (R.B.)
| | - Massimiliano Raponi
- Health Directorate, Bambino Gesù Children’s Hospital IRCCS, 00165 Rome, Italy; (S.S.); (M.R.)
| | - Livia Ferri
- Post-Graduate School of Occupational Health, Catholic University of Sacred Heart, 00168 Rome, Italy; (L.F.); (N.M.)
| | - Americo Cicchetti
- Graduate School of Health Economics and Management, Catholic University of Sacred Heart (ALTEMS), 00168 Rome, Italy; (E.D.B.); (A.C.)
| | - Nicola Magnavita
- Post-Graduate School of Occupational Health, Catholic University of Sacred Heart, 00168 Rome, Italy; (L.F.); (N.M.)
- Department of Woman, Child & Public Health, Gemelli Policlinic Foundation IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Salvatore Zaffina
- Health Directorate, Occupational Medicine Service, Bambino Gesù Children’s Hospital IRCCS, 00165 Rome, Italy; (V.C.); (F.G.); (A.S.); (M.R.V.); (R.B.)
- Human Resources Directorate, Bambino Gesù Children’s Hospital IRCCS, 00165 Rome, Italy; (V.M.); (N.M.); (M.F.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +39-06-6859-3150; Fax: +39-06-6859-3852
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Holmlund L, Guidetti S, Hultling C, Seiger Å, Eriksson G, Asaba E. Evaluating the feasibility of ReWork-SCI: a person-centred intervention for return-to-work after spinal cord injury. BMJ Open 2020; 10:e036000. [PMID: 32819984 PMCID: PMC7443280 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-036000] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/25/2019] [Revised: 06/26/2020] [Accepted: 07/01/2020] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To evaluate the feasibility of: (1) ReWork-SCI with regard to adherence and acceptability and (2) a study design for evaluating ReWork-SCI with regard to recruitment, retention and outcome measures. DESIGN Pre-test and post-test, single group, feasibility study. SETTING Spinal cord injury (SCI) unit at a regional rehabilitation centre in Sweden. PARTICIPANTS Two women and five men (n=7). Eligible criteria: (1) sustained traumatic or non-traumatic SCI; (2) completed the first acute care episode in a hospital; (3) between 18 to 65 years of age; (4) assessed by a physician as approachable for participation in the intervention; (5) history of permanent or temporary employment; (6) self-reported desire to return to work; and (7) ability to communicate in English or Swedish. INTERVENTION ReWork-SCI is a person-centred intervention for return-to-work (RTW), developed and evaluated using the Medical Research Council's guidelines. ReWork-SCI follows a person-centred, structured and coordinated intervention process led by a coordinator within a SCI rehabilitation team. OUTCOME MEASURES The feasibility of ReWork-SCI and a study design was evaluated using a set of outcome measurement tools, vocational data, logbooks and semi-structured interviews. RESULTS All eligible participants accepted enrolment and follow-up. All participants had a plan for RTW after 3 months and four participants had initiated part-time work or work trial 6 months after commencement of intervention. Adherence and acceptability were overall good. Challenges of the intervention related to the person-centred follow-up, staff shortage and rootedness in the SCI team. CONCLUSIONS ReWork-SCI was feasible and can contribute to a systematic design of an individualised plan, facilitate decision-making and build trust in the RTW process after SCI. Core features of the intervention was the systematic structure, use of a person-centred approach and dialogue with the employer. For the effectiveness of ReWork-SCI, modifications and considerations of study design are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lisa Holmlund
- Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet, Huddinge, Sweden
- Rehab Station Stockholm/Spinalis, R&D Unit, Rehab Station Stockholm, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Susanne Guidetti
- Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet, Huddinge, Sweden
| | - Claes Hultling
- Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet, Huddinge, Sweden
- Department of Neurology, Karolinska Universitetssjukhuset, Solna, Sweden
| | - Åke Seiger
- Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet, Huddinge, Sweden
- Rehab Station Stockholm/Spinalis, R&D Unit, Rehab Station Stockholm, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Gunilla Eriksson
- Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet, Huddinge, Sweden
- Department of Neuroscience, Rehabilitation Medicine, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Eric Asaba
- Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet, Huddinge, Sweden
- Research, Education, and Development Unit, Stockholms Sjukhem Foundation, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Holmlund L, Guidetti S, Eriksson G, Asaba E. Return-to-work: Exploring professionals' experiences of support for persons with spinal cord injury. Scand J Occup Ther 2020; 28:571-581. [PMID: 32755475 DOI: 10.1080/11038128.2020.1795245] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To generate knowledge about how professional stakeholders organise and experience the support of the return-to-work (RTW) process for persons with spinal cord injury (SCI). METHODS Constructivist grounded theory approach. Professional stakeholders (n = 34) involved in the RTW process and representing three Swedish Regions were recruited into seven focus groups. Analysis followed initial, focussed, and theoretical coding. FINDINGS The core category - mediating intentions to support work and possibilities of working through social, labour market, and societal context - illustrates complexities of when and how to support a person with SCI in the RTW process, and a risk of delayed, unequal, or absent RTW processes. Analysis outlines: (1) Assessment of ability to work - uncertainty of how and when; (2) Planning RTW - divide between dynamic and rule-based perspectives; (3) Work re-entry - unequal paths towards viable solutions. CONCLUSIONS In RTW after SCI, it is critical to acknowledge how the RTW process is situated in relation to the person and context. A possible direction - grounded in an occupational perspective - through early identification of needs and resources and coordination derived from the SCI rehabilitation setting within healthcare is suggested. This can facilitate a time-sensitive and equal RTW process.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lisa Holmlund
- Department of Neurobiology, Care Science and Society, Division of Occupational Therapy, Karolinska Institutet, Huddinge, Sweden.,Spinalis SCI Unit, Rehab Station Stockholm, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Susanne Guidetti
- Department of Neurobiology, Care Science and Society, Division of Occupational Therapy, Karolinska Institutet, Huddinge, Sweden
| | - Gunilla Eriksson
- Department of Neurobiology, Care Science and Society, Division of Occupational Therapy, Karolinska Institutet, Huddinge, Sweden.,Department of Neuroscience, Rehabilitation Medicine, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Eric Asaba
- Department of Neurobiology, Care Science and Society, Division of Occupational Therapy, Karolinska Institutet, Huddinge, Sweden.,Research, Education, and Development Unit, Stockholms Sjukhem Foundation, Stockholm, Sweden.,Department of Occupational Therapy, Graduate School of Human Health Sciences, Tokyo Metropolitan University, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Frutiger M, Borotkanics R. Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Suggest Strength Training and Workplace Modifications May Reduce Neck Pain in Office Workers. Pain Pract 2020; 21:100-131. [PMID: 32657531 DOI: 10.1111/papr.12940] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2020] [Revised: 07/05/2020] [Accepted: 07/08/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Neck pain is a burdensome musculoskeletal disorder in office workers. Workplace interventions aim to prevent and minimize the effect of neck pain and improve work quality. However, the summed effect of workplace interventions on neck pain in office workers remains unclear. This systematic review with meta-analysis and meta-regression evaluated the summed effect of workplace interventions on neck pain in office workers. METHODS We searched 7 electronic databases to January 2020 for randomized clinical trials. We selected studies, independently extracted data, and assessed risk of bias. Meta-analyses were carried out along with normalized trend plots. RESULTS Twenty-nine trials, including 8 of high quality, met our inclusion criteria. Normalized trend plots indicate that neck strengthening demonstrated the sharpest decrease in pain scores. The results of pre- and post-outcome measurement of the effect of activity performance and workplace modification showed significant improvements in self-reported neck pain (P ≤ 0.001). Meta-regression was used to evaluate the effect of time, but it was not significant. CONCLUSIONS There is low-quality evidence that neck strengthening and tailored workstation modifications are effective at reducing neck pain in office workers. Further high-quality research methodology, including clinicians, is important to evaluate this summed effect.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martin Frutiger
- Department of Chiropractic, Faculty of Science and Engineering, Macquarie University, North Ryde, NSW, Australia
| | - Robert Borotkanics
- Faculty of Health and Environmental Sciences, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Andersén Å, Berglund E, Anderzén I. Rehabilitation coordinator intervention versus control in psychiatric specialist care for return to work and reduced sick leave: study protocol of a randomised controlled trial. BMC Public Health 2020; 20:250. [PMID: 32075611 PMCID: PMC7031909 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-020-8238-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/15/2020] [Accepted: 01/20/2020] [Indexed: 08/24/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Mental disorders are the most common reason for sick leave in Sweden. Knowledge about effective methods to help these individuals to return to work (RTW)/entry into work or studies is limited. Rehabilitation coordinators (RC’s) have been introduced within healthcare with the purpose to promote cooperation, streamline the sick leave and rehabilitation process, and facilitate RTW for sick-listed patients. The function of RC’s has shown positive results by reducing sick leave within primary healthcare. However, the function has not been evaluated in terms of specialist psychiatry. This paper describes the design of a study to evaluate effects of a RC intervention on sick leave and RTW/entry in work or studies in patients with moderate to severe affective and/or moderate to severe anxiety disorders within specialist psychiatric care. Methods A randomised controlled trial (RCT) comparing an intervention group receiving support from a RC with a control group receiving treatment as usual (TAU). The target group is patients on sick leave, treated for affective and/or anxiety disorder, aged 25–64, with or without employment. Discussion This study gives the possibility to evaluate a RC intervention for individuals with mental disorders. If the study has promising vocational outcomes, it may be of importance for the participants in many ways, e.g. increase participation in society, provide economic benefits and improve health and wellbeing. This would be valuable for the individual as well as for the society. Trial registration The study is registered at the Clinicaltrials.gov Register Platform (ID NCT03729050) in 2 November 2018.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Åsa Andersén
- Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Uppsala University, P.O Box 564, SE-751 22, Uppsala, Sweden.
| | - Erik Berglund
- Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Uppsala University, P.O Box 564, SE-751 22, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Ingrid Anderzén
- Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Uppsala University, P.O Box 564, SE-751 22, Uppsala, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Oestergaard LG, Christensen FB, Bünger CE, Søgaard R, Holm R, Helmig P, Nielsen CV. Does adding case management to standard rehabilitation affect functional ability, pain, or the rate of return to work after lumbar spinal fusion? A randomized controlled trial with two-year follow-up. Clin Rehabil 2020; 34:357-368. [PMID: 31964172 DOI: 10.1177/0269215519897106] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To examine the effect of a case manager-assisted rehabilitation programme as an add-on to usual physical rehabilitation in patients undergoing lumbar spinal fusion. DESIGN A randomized controlled trial with a two-year follow-up. SETTINGS Outpatient clinics of a university hospital and a general hospital. SUBJECTS In total, 82 patients undergoing lumbar spinal fusion. INTERVENTIONS The patients were randomized one-to-one to case manager-assisted rehabilitation (case manager group) or no case manager-assisted rehabilitation (control group). Both groups received usual physical rehabilitation. The case manager-assisted rehabilitation programme included a preoperative meeting with a case manager to determine a rehabilitation plan, postsurgical meetings, phone meetings, and voluntary workplace visits or roundtable meetings. MAIN MEASURES Primary outcome was the Oswestry Disability Index. Secondary outcomes were back pain, leg pain, and return to work. RESULTS Of the 41 patients in the case manager group, 49% were men, with the mean age of 46.1 (±8.7 years). In the control group, 51% were male, with the mean age of 47.4 (±8.9 years). No statistically significant between-group differences were found regarding any outcomes. An overall group effect of 4.1 points (95% confidence interval (CI): -1.8; 9.9) was found on the Oswestry Disability Index, favouring the control group. After two years, the relative risk of return to work was 1.18 (95% CI: 0.8; 1.7), favouring the case manager group. CONCLUSION The case manager-assisted rehabilitation programme had no effect on the patients' functional disability or back and leg pain compared to usual physical rehabilitation. The study lacked power to evaluate the impact on return to work.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lisa Gregersen Oestergaard
- Department of Physiotherapy and Occupational Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.,Department of Public Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.,Centre of Research in Rehabilitation (CORIR), Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | | | - Cody Eric Bünger
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Rikke Søgaard
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.,Section of Social Medicine and Rehabilitation, Department of Public Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Randi Holm
- Orthopedic Department, Regional Hospital Silkeborg, Silkeborg, Denmark
| | - Peter Helmig
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Claus Vinther Nielsen
- Section of Social Medicine and Rehabilitation, Department of Public Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.,DEFACTUM, Central Denmark Region, Aarhus, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Pieper D, Müller D, Stock S. Challenges in teaching systematic reviews to non-clinicians. ZEITSCHRIFT FUR EVIDENZ FORTBILDUNG UND QUALITAET IM GESUNDHEITSWESEN 2019; 147-148:1-6. [PMID: 31734093 DOI: 10.1016/j.zefq.2019.10.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2019] [Revised: 09/24/2019] [Accepted: 10/23/2019] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Abstract
Systematic reviews are regarded as the cornerstone of evidence-based decision making across many disciplines. The teaching of systematic review methods is thus very important, yet it is a field that still remains unexplored. In this paper, we will outline an approach for teaching non-clinicians about systematic reviews at the University of Cologne. Our aim was to cast some light on the challenges involved and to stimulate discussion and discourse on this topic. Out of a total of twelve weeks of teaching (1.5hours per week), nine of them included hands-on exercises that cover all the steps involved in a systematic review, from defining a specific review question up to conducting and interpreting meta-analyses. The course was based on the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions that provide specific guidance for the development and assessment of systematic reviews. A well-reported, well-conducted systematic review was used as a working example throughout the course. The course was taught by an experienced systematic reviewer without input from additional experts such as information specialists or biometricians. To improve the learning success, four fields of challenge were identified: the selection of appropriate topics for the course assignment, the selection of an appropriate guiding review, specific requirements related for the lecturer, and the integration of methodological progress.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dawid Pieper
- Institute for Research in Operative Medicine. Faculty of Health, School of Medicine. Witten/Herdecke University. 51109, Cologne, Germany.
| | - Dirk Müller
- Institute for Health Economics and Clinical Epidemiology. University Hospital of Cologne (AöR). Gleueler Straße 176-178. 50935, Cologne, Germany
| | - Stephanie Stock
- Institute for Health Economics and Clinical Epidemiology. University Hospital of Cologne (AöR). Gleueler Straße 176-178. 50935, Cologne, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Skarpaas LS, Haveraaen LA, Småstuen MC, Shaw WS, Aas RW. Horizontal return to work coordination was more common in RTW programs than the recommended vertical coordination. The Rapid-RTW cohort study. BMC Health Serv Res 2019; 19:759. [PMID: 31655594 PMCID: PMC6815375 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-019-4607-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2018] [Accepted: 10/04/2019] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In return-to-work (RTW) programs, coordinators are often provided in order to integrate services. However, models of coordinating services vary widely internationally, and across different programs, where one distinction is between vertical and horizontal integration (i.e. between levels/institutions, or within one service/level). The aim of this study was therefore to explore and describe if and how a coordinator was provided in RTW-programs, and whether the provision of a coordinator was associated with certain personal or intervention characteristics. METHODS The study was designed as a cohort study following employees participating in a variety of Rapid-RTW-programs in Norway (n = 39). Employees (n = 494) answered a self-administered questionnaire, which was linked to register-data on diagnoses and sickness-absence. Employees who replied yes/no to the question "Did the program provide a person who tailored or coordinated your services?" were included in this analysis. Associations for being provided with a coordinator were tested in adjusted logistic regression models. RESULTS Sixty-nine percent of the employees reported having a coordinator. These coordinators were mainly responsible for coordinating treatment within own programs (i.e. horizontal coordination, 68%). As expected, rehabilitation programs more often provided a coordinator compared to treatment programs (OR 3.87 95% CI 2.42-6.24). The odds for being provided with a coordinator were reduced for each additional year of age of the employee (OR 0.97, 95% CI 0.96-0.99). More professions were involved in programs that provided coordinators, also more contact with other stakeholders like leaders and social insurance services (NAV), but only contact with supervisor remained statistically significant in adjusted analysis (OR 1.69 95% CI 0.31-9.27). The programs with a coordinator more often provided adaptations at the workplace for the individual employee (OR 0.08 95% CI 0.01-0.60). However, these signs of vertical integration were only evident for a limited number of employees. CONCLUSION In this study, seven of ten employees reported to have a coordinator, which was associated with more professions and stakeholder involvement in the RTW-process. Most of these coordinators did not coordinate vertically between the service levels and types of intervention arenas for sick listed employees (i.e. workplace, social security, and health care services), as recommended in earlier research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lisebet Skeie Skarpaas
- Presenter - Making Sense of Science, Stavanger, Norway. .,Department of Occupational Therapy, Prosthetics and Orthotics, Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway.
| | | | | | - William S Shaw
- Division of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, University of Connecticut School of Medicine, Farmington, CT, USA
| | - Randi Wågø Aas
- Presenter - Making Sense of Science, Stavanger, Norway.,Department of Occupational Therapy, Prosthetics and Orthotics, Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway.,Department of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Ibrahim ME, Weber K, Courvoisier DS, Genevay S. Recovering the capability to work among patients with chronic low Back pain after a four-week, multidisciplinary biopsychosocial rehabilitation program: 18-month follow-up study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2019; 20:439. [PMID: 31597562 PMCID: PMC6785904 DOI: 10.1186/s12891-019-2831-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2019] [Accepted: 09/12/2019] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Chronic low back pain (LBP) is a leading cause of disability worldwide. Biopsychosocial rehabilitation programs have been advocated for its management, especially since the widespread acceptance of the biopsychosocial model of chronic pain. Despite extensive evidence of its short-term benefits, few studies have reported on its long-term effect and more specifically on indirect outcomes such as return to work and quality of life (QoL). The present study evaluated the long-term effect of a multidisciplinary biopsychosocial rehabilitation (MBR) program for patients with chronic LBP, for which short- and intermediate-term efficacy had been established, with an emphasis on recovering work capability. METHODS This prospective cohort study enrolled 201 patients on a four-week MBR program incorporating physical and occupational therapies and psychological counselling. Assessments occurred at program admission and discharge and at 6 and 18 months. Work capability, Oswestry Disability Index, Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia, Core Outcome Measures Index (COMI), and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale were assessed. Multiple mixed models were used to detect changes in each outcome. Logistic regressions were calculated to identify predictors of recovery of work capability. RESULTS Of the 201 patients who fulfilled the eligibility criteria, 160 (79.8%) attended the discharge assessment, 127 (63.2%) attended the 6-month follow-up, and 107 (53.3%) continued to the 18-month follow-up. Initially, 128 patients (71.5%) had been on sick leave. At 6 and 18 months, 72 (56.7%) and 84 (78.5%) participants had recovered their work capability, respectively. There were significant improvements in pain, disability, kinesiophobia, and anxiety and depression scores over time. Patients who recovered work capability showed significantly greater improvements in their total COMI score, general QoL, and disability, which were the best three predictors of recovering work capability. CONCLUSIONS This study extends previous results confirming the program's contribution to recovering work capability among chronic LBP patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maha E. Ibrahim
- Division of Rheumatology, University Hospitals of Geneva, Beau Séjour Hospital, CH-1205, 14 Geneva, Switzerland
- Department of Physical Medicine, Rheumatology and Rehabilitation, Suez Canal University, Ismailia, Egypt
| | - Kerstin Weber
- Medical Direction, University Hospitals of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Delphine S. Courvoisier
- Division of Rheumatology, University Hospitals of Geneva, Beau Séjour Hospital, CH-1205, 14 Geneva, Switzerland
- Quality of Care Service, University Hospitals of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
- Department of General Internal Medicine, Rehabilitation and Geriatrics, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Stéphane Genevay
- Division of Rheumatology, University Hospitals of Geneva, Beau Séjour Hospital, CH-1205, 14 Geneva, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Björk Brämberg E, Sandman L, Hellman T, Kwak L. Facilitators, barriers and ethical values related to the coordination of return-to-work among employees on sick leave due to common mental disorders: a protocol for a qualitative study (the CORE-project). BMJ Open 2019; 9:e032463. [PMID: 31530623 PMCID: PMC6756367 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032463] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/19/2019] [Revised: 08/27/2019] [Accepted: 08/29/2019] [Indexed: 01/21/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Diagnoses related to common mental disorders such as anxiety, depression, adjustment disorders and stress-related disorders are one of the leading causes of long-term sick leave for both women and men in Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development countries. To increase the rate of return-to-work workplace involvement in a coordinated return-to-work process has been included in recent best practice guidelines. This form of cooperation is a complex process, involving political structures and a wide range of stakeholders. The study's first aim is to describe facilitators and barriers to the coordination of return-to-work from the perspectives of: (A) employees on sick leave due to common mental disorders, (B) employers, (C) rehabilitation coordinators, (D) physicians and (E) other stakeholders. The second aim is to identify ethical issues that arise in the coordination of return-to-work and analyse how these can be resolved. METHODS AND ANALYSIS The study has a qualitative design using interviews with employees on sick leave due to common mental disorders, employers, rehabilitation coordinators, physicians and other stakeholders. The study is conducted in the Swedish primary healthcare. Employees, employers and rehabilitation coordinators are recruited via primary healthcare centres. Rehabilitation coordinators receive information about the study and those who consent to participation are asked to recruit employees and employers. Interview guides have been developed from the consolidated framework for implementation research and ethical values and norms found in Swedish healthcare, social services and workplace legislation. Data will be analysed with qualitative content analysis reflecting manifest and latent content, and ethical issues will be analysed by means of reflective equilibrium methodology. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION The study was approved by the Regional Ethical Review Board in Stockholm, Sweden (Reg.no 2018/677-31/2 and 2018/2119-32). The findings will be disseminated through publication in scientific journals, social media, seminars and national and international conferences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Lars Sandman
- Department of Medical and Health Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Therese Hellman
- Department of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Lydia Kwak
- Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Honkonen N, Liira J, Lamminpää A, Liira H. Work ability meetings-a survey of Finnish occupational physicians. Occup Med (Lond) 2019; 68:551-554. [PMID: 30192976 DOI: 10.1093/occmed/kqy115] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Work ability meetings (WAMs) are planned discussions between an employee, a manager and an occupational physician (OP) to support work ability and return to work (RTW). During the last decade, WAMs become a popular intervention in Finnish occupational healthcare, although research on their content is lacking. Aims To describe the practice of WAMs in Finland. Methods We sent an internet survey by e-mail to members of the Finnish Society of Occupational Health Physicians in August 2014. We asked them to describe the last WAM they had attended, the employee the meeting concerned, the reason why it was convened, the content of the meeting and the action plan developed. Results A total of 303 of 1304 OPs responded (24%) to the survey. The meetings were most often arranged for employees in manual or clerical work (71%). There were several overlapping reasons for convening a WAM, including a worker's reduced work ability (57%), functional ability (42%) or long-term sickness absence (38%). The meetings consisted of RTW planning, clarification of the situation and a dialogue between the three parties. In half of the cases, the action plans dealt with modifications of work tasks. A third of cases were forwarded to vocational rehabilitation, while permanent disability pension was considered in 6% of cases. Conclusions The focus of WAMs was on workplace adjustments to support workers to remain at work. The WAMs dealt mostly with early interventions for RTW: work modifications, adjustments and vocational rehabilitation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - J Liira
- Finnish Institute of Occupational Health, Helsinki, Finland
| | | | - H Liira
- Unit of Primary Health Care, Helsinki University Central Hospital and Department of General Practice, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Skarpaas LS, Haveraaen LA, Småstuen MC, Shaw WS, Aas RW. The association between having a coordinator and return to work: the rapid-return-to-work cohort study. BMJ Open 2019; 9:e024597. [PMID: 30782911 PMCID: PMC6398742 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024597] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2018] [Revised: 11/29/2018] [Accepted: 12/05/2018] [Indexed: 11/03/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to assess if the reported provision of a coordinator was associated with time to first return to work (RTW) and first full RTW among sick-listed employees who participated in different rapid-RTW programmes in Norway. DESIGN The study was designed as a cohort study. SETTING Rapid-RTW programmes financed by the regional health authority in hospitals and Norwegian Labour and Welfare Administration in Norway. PARTICIPANTS The sample included employees on full-time sick leave (n=326) who participated in rapid-RTW programmes (n=43), who provided information about the coordination of the services they received. The median age was 46 years (minimum-maximum 21-67) and 71% were female. The most common reported diagnoses were musculoskeletal (57%) and mental health disorders (14%). INTERVENTIONS The employees received different types of individually tailored RTW programmes all aimed at a rapid RTW; occupational rehabilitation (64%), treatment for medical or psychological issues, including assessment, and surgery (26%), and follow-up and work clarification services (10%). It was common to be provided with a coordinator (73%). PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES Outcomes were measured as time to first RTW (graded and 100%) and first full RTW (100%). RESULTS Employees provided with a coordinator returned to work later than employees who did not have a coordinator; a median (95% CI) of 128 (80 to 176) days vs 61 (43 to 79) days for first RTW, respectively. This difference did not remain statistically significant in the adjusted regression analysis. For full RTW, there was no statistically significant difference between employees provided with a coordinator versus those who were not. CONCLUSIONS The model of coordination, provided in the Norwegian rapid-RTW programmes was not associated with a more rapid RTW for sick-listed employees. Rethinking how RTW coordination should be organised could be wise in future programme development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lisebet Skeie Skarpaas
- Presenter - Making Sense of Science, Stavanger, Norway
- Department of Occupational Therapy, Prosthetics and Orthotics, Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway
| | | | | | - William S Shaw
- Division of Occupational & Environmental Medicine, University of Connecticut School of Medicine, Farmington, Connecticut, USA
| | - Randi Wågø Aas
- Presenter - Making Sense of Science, Stavanger, Norway
- Department of Occupational Therapy, Prosthetics and Orthotics, Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Gustavsson C, Hinas E, Ljungquist T, Alexanderson K. General practitioners' use of sickness certification guidelines in Sweden at introduction and four years later: a survey study. Int J Qual Health Care 2018; 30:429-436. [PMID: 29590398 DOI: 10.1093/intqhc/mzy044] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2017] [Accepted: 03/09/2018] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective National sickness certification guidelines were introduced in Sweden in 2007, comprising both overarching and diagnoses-specific recommendations. This study aimed to investigate how general practitioners (GP) used and perceived the usefulness of these guidelines in the sickness certification process close after introduction and 4 years later. Design Two nationwide cross-sectional surveys in 2008 and 2012. Setting Swedish healthcare. Participants Physicians working in primary healthcare and having sickness certification consultations at least a few times per year (n = 4214 in 2008, and n = 4067 in 2012). Main Outcome Measures Frequency of use and perceived usefulness of the sickness certification guidelines. Results Most GPs used the guidelines at least a few times per year (in 2008 74.6%; in 2012 85.2%). In 2008, 44.1% reported a need to develop competence in using the guidelines, compared with 23.3% in 2012. Of those using the guidelines, 36.7% in 2008 and 44.6% in 2012 reported it problematic to write sickness certificates in accordance with the guidelines. Most GPs (89.2% in 2008 and 88.8% in 2012) valued the guidelines beneficial to ensure quality in sickness certification consultations. A larger proportion in 2012 compared with 2008 reported that the guidelines facilitated contacts with patients (61.2%, respectively, 55.6%), as well as with other stakeholders. Conclusions The guidelines were perceived as useful and beneficial to ensure high quality in sickness certification consultations, and facilitated contacts with patients as well as other stakeholders. In 2012, still one-fourth reported a need to develop more competence in using the sickness certification guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Catharina Gustavsson
- Division of Insurance Medicine, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Center for Clinical Research Dalarna, Department of Public Health and Caring Science, Uppsala University, Nissers väg 3, Falun, Sweden
| | - Elin Hinas
- Division of Insurance Medicine, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Therese Ljungquist
- Division of Insurance Medicine, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Kristina Alexanderson
- Division of Insurance Medicine, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Dias A, Gómez-Salgado J, Bernardes JM, Ruiz-Frutos C. Factors Affecting Sick Leave Duration for Non-Work-Related Temporary Disabilities in Brazilian University Public Servants. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2018; 15:ijerph15102127. [PMID: 30262726 PMCID: PMC6210080 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph15102127] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2018] [Revised: 09/20/2018] [Accepted: 09/25/2018] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
Sickness absenteeism in public institutions compromises the execution of services, and may also generate direct impacts on the population that receives coverage. To determine if sick leave duration for temporary disabilities is associated with non-work-related illnesses (NWRI), a historical cohort study was carried out of workers at a Brazilian University. The Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) was obtained from the most prevalent diagnoses in each expert examination and from the corresponding days of sick leave per episode, adjusting simple and multiple Cox regression models. As a result, 70% of the NWRI temporary disabilities were due to depressive disorders, convalescence, and dorsalgia with a sick leave duration between 4 and 320 days. The factors of protection for sick leave durations until the rehabilitation were non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus and hypertension. Long-term sick leaves were observed in the cases that required rehabilitation of those workers diagnosed with recurrent depressive disorders, conjunctivitis, acute sinusitis, skin disorders, calculus of kidney and ureter, abdominal and pelvic pain, and same-level fall accidents. It is also worth noting that even in a disease that can justify long-term sick leaves, such as breast cancer, the duration may be shorter according to the worker’s capacity and self-efficacy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adriano Dias
- Public Health Grade Program, Botucatu Medical School, Paulista State University/UNESP, Botucatu, Sao Paulo 18618687, Brazil.
| | - Juan Gómez-Salgado
- Department of Nursing, Universidad de Huelva, 21007 Huelva, Spain.
- Safety and Health Posgrade Program, Universidad Espíritu Santo, Samborondón (Guayaquil) 091650, Ecuador.
| | - João Marcos Bernardes
- Public Health Grade Program, Botucatu Medical School, Paulista State University/UNESP, Botucatu, Sao Paulo 18618687, Brazil.
| | - Carlos Ruiz-Frutos
- Department of Sociology, Social Work and Public Health, Universidad de Huelva, 21007 Huelva, Spain.
- Safety and Health Posgrade Program, Universidad Espíritu Santo, Samborondón (Guayaquil) 091650, Ecuador.
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Bethge M, Spanier K, Peters E, Michel E, Radoschewski M. Self-Reported Work Ability Predicts Rehabilitation Measures, Disability Pensions, Other Welfare Benefits, and Work Participation: Longitudinal Findings from a Sample of German Employees. JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL REHABILITATION 2018; 28:495-503. [PMID: 28956225 DOI: 10.1007/s10926-017-9733-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/07/2023]
Abstract
Purpose The study examined the performance of the Work Ability Index in predicting rehabilitation measures and disability pensions, sickness absence and unemployment benefits, and work participation among a sample of workers previously receiving sickness absence benefits. Methods Workers aged 40 to 54 years who received sickness absence benefits in 2012 completed the Work Ability Index in 2013. Outcomes were extracted from administrative data records. Results Data for 2149 participants were included (mean age: 47.8 years; 54.4% women). Mean follow-up was 19 months. Work Ability Index scores were poor (7-27 points) in 21% of the participants, and moderate (28-36 points) in 38.4%. In all, 224 rehabilitation measures and 35 disability pensions were approved. Fully adjusted analyses showed increased risk of rehabilitation measures in workers with poor (HR 4.55; 95% CI 3.14-6.60) and moderate scores (HR 2.08; 95% CI 1.43-3.01) compared to workers with good or excellent scores (37-49 points). The risk of a disability pension increased significantly for workers with poor scores (HR 7.78; 95% CI 2.59-23.35). In addition, poor scores were prospectively associated with a longer duration of sickness absence and employment benefits, and fewer employment days and less income from regular employment. Conclusions The Work Ability Index is a potential tool for following up workers who already have an increased risk of permanent work disability due to previous long-term sickness absence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthias Bethge
- Institute of Social Medicine and Epidemiology, University of Lübeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, 23562, Lübeck, Germany.
| | - Katja Spanier
- Institute of Social Medicine and Epidemiology, University of Lübeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, 23562, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Elke Peters
- Institute of Social Medicine and Epidemiology, University of Lübeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, 23562, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Elliot Michel
- Institute of Medical Sociology and Rehabilitation Science, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Michael Radoschewski
- Institute of Medical Sociology and Rehabilitation Science, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Intervention policies and social security in case of reduced working capacity in the Netherlands, Finland and Germany: a comparative analysis. Int J Public Health 2018; 63:1081-1088. [DOI: 10.1007/s00038-018-1133-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2017] [Revised: 05/26/2018] [Accepted: 06/06/2018] [Indexed: 10/28/2022] Open
|
36
|
Aasdahl L, Foldal VS, Standal MI, Hagen R, Johnsen R, Solbjør M, Fimland MS, Fossen H, Jensen C, Bagøien G, Halsteinli V, Fors EA. Motivational interviewing in long-term sickness absence: study protocol of a randomized controlled trial followed by qualitative and economic studies. BMC Public Health 2018; 18:756. [PMID: 29914463 PMCID: PMC6007062 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-018-5686-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2018] [Accepted: 06/10/2018] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Motivational interviewing (MI), mainly used and shown effective in health care (substance abuse, smoking cessation, increasing exercise and other life style changes), is a collaborative conversation (style) about change that could be useful for individuals having problems related to return to work (RTW). The aim of this paper is to describe the design of a randomized controlled trial evaluating the effect of MI on RTW among sick listed persons compared to usual care, in a social security setting. METHODS The study is a randomized controlled trial with parallel group design. Individuals between 18 and 60 years who have been sick listed for more than 7 weeks, with a current sick leave status of 50-100%, are identified in the Norwegian National Social Security System and invited to participate in the study. Exclusion criteria are no employment and pregnancy. Included participants are randomly assigned to the MI intervention or one of two control groups. The MI intervention consists of two MI sessions offered by caseworkers at the Norwegian Labor and Welfare Service (NAV), while the comparative arms consist of a usual care group and a group that receives two extra sessions without MI content (to control for attentional bias). The primary outcome measure is the total number of sickness absence days during 12 months after inclusion, obtained from national registers. Secondary outcomes include time until full sustainable return to work, health-related quality of life and mental health status. In addition, a health economic evaluation, a feasibility/process evaluation and qualitative studies will be performed as part of the study. DISCUSSION A previous study has suggested an effect of MI on RTW for sick listed workers with musculoskeletal complaints. The present study will evaluate the effect of MI for all sick listed workers, regardless of diagnosis. The knowledge from this study will potentially be important for policy makers, clinicians and other professionals` practical work. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03212118 (registered July 11, 2017).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lene Aasdahl
- Department of Public Health and Nursing, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Postboks 8905, MTFS, 7491, Trondheim, Norway. .,Unicare Helsefort Rehabilitation Centre, Rissa, Norway.
| | - Vegard Stolsmo Foldal
- Department of Public Health and Nursing, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Postboks 8905, MTFS, 7491, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Martin Inge Standal
- Department of Psychology, Faculty of Social and Educational Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Roger Hagen
- Department of Psychology, Faculty of Social and Educational Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Roar Johnsen
- Department of Public Health and Nursing, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Postboks 8905, MTFS, 7491, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Marit Solbjør
- Department of Public Health and Nursing, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Postboks 8905, MTFS, 7491, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Marius Steiro Fimland
- Department of Public Health and Nursing, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Postboks 8905, MTFS, 7491, Trondheim, Norway.,Unicare Helsefort Rehabilitation Centre, Rissa, Norway.,Department of Neuromedicine and Movement Science, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Heidi Fossen
- The Norwegian Labour and Welfare Service of Trøndelag, Steinkjer, Norway
| | - Chris Jensen
- Department of Public Health and Nursing, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Postboks 8905, MTFS, 7491, Trondheim, Norway.,National Advisory Unit on Occupational Rehabilitation, Rehabiliteringssenteret AiR, Rauland, Norway
| | - Gunnhild Bagøien
- Tiller Community Mental Health Centre, Division of Psychiatry, St. Olavs Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Vidar Halsteinli
- Department of Public Health and Nursing, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Postboks 8905, MTFS, 7491, Trondheim, Norway.,Regional Center for Health Care Improvement, St. Olavs Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Egil Andreas Fors
- General Practice Research Unit, Department of Public Health and Nursing, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Hara KW, Bjørngaard JH, Brage S, Borchgrevink PC, Halsteinli V, Stiles TC, Johnsen R, Woodhouse A. Randomized Controlled Trial of Adding Telephone Follow-Up to an Occupational Rehabilitation Program to Increase Work Participation. JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL REHABILITATION 2018; 28:265-278. [PMID: 28597308 PMCID: PMC5978834 DOI: 10.1007/s10926-017-9711-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/09/2023]
Abstract
Purpose Transfer from on-site rehabilitation to the participant's daily environment is considered a weak link in the rehabilitation chain. The main objective of this study is to see if adding boosted telephone follow-up directly after completing an occupational rehabilitation program effects work participation. Methods A randomized controlled study included participants with chronic pain, chronic fatigue or common mental disorders on long-term sick leave. After completing 3½ weeks of acceptance and commitment therapy based occupational rehabilitation, participants were randomized to boosted follow-up or a control group before returning to their daily environment. The intervention was delivered over 6 months by on-site RTW coordinators mainly via telephone. Primary outcome was RTW categorized as participation in competitive work ≥1 day per week on average over 8 weeks. Results There were 213 participants of mean age 42 years old. Main diagnoses of sick leave certification were mental disorders (38%) and musculoskeletal disorders (30%). One year after discharge the intervention group had 87% increased odds (OR 1.87, 95% confidence interval 1.06-3.31, p = 0.031), of (re)entry to competitive work ≥1 day per week compared with the controls, with similar positive results for sensitivity analysis of participation half time (≥2.5 days per week). The cost of boosted follow-up was 390.5 EUR per participant. Conclusion Participants receiving boosted RTW follow-up had higher (re)entry to competitive work ≥1 day per week at 1 year when compared to the control group. Adding low-cost boosted follow-up by telephone after completing an occupational rehabilitation program augmented the effect on return-to-work.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karen Walseth Hara
- Department of Public Health and Nursing, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Postbox 8905, 7491, Trondheim, Norway.
- Norwegian Advisory Unit on Complex Symptom Disorders, St. Olavs Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway.
- Department of Circulation and Medical Imaging, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim, Norway.
- The Norwegian Labour and Welfare Service of Sør-Trøndelag, Trondheim, Norway.
| | - Johan Håkon Bjørngaard
- Department of Public Health and Nursing, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Postbox 8905, 7491, Trondheim, Norway
- Forensic Department and Research Centre Brøset, St. Olavs Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Søren Brage
- The Norwegian Directorate for Labour and Welfare, Oslo, Norway
| | - Petter Christian Borchgrevink
- Norwegian Advisory Unit on Complex Symptom Disorders, St. Olavs Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway
- Department of Circulation and Medical Imaging, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim, Norway
- Hysnes Rehabilitation Center, St. Olavs Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Vidar Halsteinli
- Department of Public Health and Nursing, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Postbox 8905, 7491, Trondheim, Norway
- Centre for Health Care Improvement, St. Olavs Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Tore Charles Stiles
- Department of Psychology, Faculty of Social and Educational Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim, Norway
| | - Roar Johnsen
- Department of Public Health and Nursing, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Postbox 8905, 7491, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Astrid Woodhouse
- Department of Public Health and Nursing, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Postbox 8905, 7491, Trondheim, Norway
- Norwegian Advisory Unit on Complex Symptom Disorders, St. Olavs Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Stochkendahl MJ, Larsen OK, Nim CG, Axén I, Haraldsson J, Kvammen OC, Myburgh C. Can chiropractors contribute to work disability prevention through sickness absence management for musculoskeletal disorders? - a comparative qualitative case study in the Scandinavian context. Chiropr Man Therap 2018; 26:15. [PMID: 29713458 PMCID: PMC5918554 DOI: 10.1186/s12998-018-0184-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2017] [Accepted: 04/04/2018] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Despite extensive publication of clinical guidelines on how to manage musculoskeletal pain and back pain in particular, these efforts have not significantly translated into decreases in work disability due to musculoskeletal pain. Previous studies have indicated a potential for better outcomes by formalized, early referral to allied healthcare providers familiar with occupational health issues. Instances where allied healthcare providers of comparable professional characteristics, but with differing practice parameters, can highlight important social and organisational strategies useful for informing policy and practice. Currently, Norwegian chiropractors have legislated sickness certification rights, whereas their Danish and Swedish counterparts do not. Against the backdrop of legislative variation, we described, compared and contrasted the views and experiences of Scandinavian chiropractors engaging in work disability prevention and sickness absence management. Methods This study was embedded in a two-phased, sequential exploratory mixed-methods design. In a comparative qualitative case study design, we explored the experience of chiropractors regarding sickness absence management drawn from face-to-face, semi-structured interviews. We subsequently coded and thematically restructured their experiences and perceptions. Results Twelve interviews were conducted. Thematically, chiropractors' capacity to support patients in sickness absence management revolved around four key issues: issues of legislation and politics; the rationale for being a sickness absence management partner; whether an integrated sickness absence management pathway existed/could be created; and finally, the barriers to service provision for sickness absence management. Conclusion Allied health providers, in this instance chiropractors, with patient management expertise can fulfil a key role in sickness absence management and by extension work disability prevention when these practices are legislatively supported. In cases where these practices occur informally, however, practitioners face systemic-related issues and professional self-image challenges that tend to hamper them in fulfilling a more integrated role as providers of work disability prevention practices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mette Jensen Stochkendahl
- 1Nordic Institute of Chiropractic and Clinical Biomechanics, Campusvej 55, DK-5230 Odense M, Denmark.,2Department of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, Campusvej 55, DK-5230 Odense M, Denmark
| | - Ole Kristoffer Larsen
- 2Department of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, Campusvej 55, DK-5230 Odense M, Denmark.,Horten, Norway
| | - Casper Glissmann Nim
- 2Department of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, Campusvej 55, DK-5230 Odense M, Denmark
| | - Iben Axén
- 4Unit of Intervention and Implementation Research for Worker Health, Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | | | - Ole Christian Kvammen
- Sandefjord, Norway.,7Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Kirkeveien 166, Frederik Holsts hus, 0450 Oslo, Norway
| | - Corrie Myburgh
- 2Department of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, Campusvej 55, DK-5230 Odense M, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Lipszyc JC, Silverman F, Holness DL, Liss GM, Lavoie KL, Tarlo SM. Comparison of clinic models for patients with work-related asthma. Occup Med (Lond) 2018; 67:477-483. [PMID: 28898964 DOI: 10.1093/occmed/kqx100] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Work-related asthma (WRA) is a prevalent occupational lung disease that is associated with undesirable effects on psychological status, quality of life (QoL), workplace activity and socioeconomic status. Previous studies have also indicated that clinic structure may impact outcomes among patients with asthma. Aims To identify the impact of clinic structure on psychological status, QoL, workplace limitations and socioeconomic status of patients with WRA among two different tertiary clinic models. Methods We performed a cross-sectional analysis between two tertiary clinics: clinic 1 had a traditional referral base and clinical staffing while clinic 2 entirely comprised Worker's Compensation System referrals and included an occupational hygienist and a return-to-work coordinator. Beck Anxiety and Depression II Inventories (BAI and BDI-II), Marks' Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (M-AQLQ) and Work Limitation Questionnaire (WLQ) were used to assess outcomes for patients with WRA. Results Clinic 2 participants had a better psychological status across the four instruments compared with clinic 1 (for Beck 'Anxiety': P < 0.001 and 'Depression': P < 0.01, 'Mood' domain of M-AQLQ: NS and 'Mental Demands' domain of WLQ: P < 0.01). Clinic 2 had a greater proportion of participants with reduced income. Conclusions Our study indicates that clinic structure may play a role in outcomes. Future research should examine this in larger sample sizes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J C Lipszyc
- Institute of Medical Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M5S 1A8, Canada.,Toronto Western Hospital, Toronto, Ontario M5T 2S8, Canada.,Division of Occupational Medicine, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario M5B 1W8, Canada
| | - F Silverman
- Institute of Medical Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M5S 1A8, Canada.,Division of Occupational Medicine, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario M5B 1W8, Canada.,Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario M5B 1TB, Canada.,Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M5S 1A8, Canada.,Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M5T 3M7, Canada
| | - D L Holness
- Institute of Medical Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M5S 1A8, Canada.,Division of Occupational Medicine, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario M5B 1W8, Canada.,Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M5S 1A8, Canada.,Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M5T 3M7, Canada.,Centre for Urban Health Solutions, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario M5B 1TB, Canada
| | - G M Liss
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M5T 3M7, Canada
| | - K L Lavoie
- Montreal Behavioural Medicine Centre, Research Centre, Centre Intégré universitaire de santé et de services sociaux du Nord de l'Ile (CIUSSS-NIM)-Hôpital du Sacré-Cœur de Montréal, Montreal, Québec H4J 1C5, Canada.,Université du Québec à Montréal (UQAM), Montreal, Québec H3C 3P8, Canada
| | - S M Tarlo
- Institute of Medical Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M5S 1A8, Canada.,Toronto Western Hospital, Toronto, Ontario M5T 2S8, Canada.,Division of Occupational Medicine, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario M5B 1W8, Canada.,Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario M5B 1TB, Canada.,Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M5S 1A8, Canada.,Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M5T 3M7, Canada.,University Health Network, Respiratory Division, Toronto, Ontario M5T 2S8, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Cullen KL, Irvin E, Collie A, Clay F, Gensby U, Jennings PA, Hogg-Johnson S, Kristman V, Laberge M, McKenzie D, Newnam S, Palagyi A, Ruseckaite R, Sheppard DM, Shourie S, Steenstra I, Van Eerd D, Amick BC. Effectiveness of Workplace Interventions in Return-to-Work for Musculoskeletal, Pain-Related and Mental Health Conditions: An Update of the Evidence and Messages for Practitioners. JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL REHABILITATION 2018; 28:1-15. [PMID: 28224415 PMCID: PMC5820404 DOI: 10.1007/s10926-016-9690-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 227] [Impact Index Per Article: 37.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/05/2023]
Abstract
Purpose The objective of this systematic review was to synthesize evidence on the effectiveness of workplace-based return-to-work (RTW) interventions and work disability management (DM) interventions that assist workers with musculoskeletal (MSK) and pain-related conditions and mental health (MH) conditions with RTW. Methods We followed a systematic review process developed by the Institute for Work & Health and an adapted best evidence synthesis that ranked evidence as strong, moderate, limited, or insufficient. Results Seven electronic databases were searched from January 1990 until April 2015, yielding 8898 non-duplicate references. Evidence from 36 medium and high quality studies were synthesized on 12 different intervention categories across three broad domains: health-focused, service coordination, and work modification interventions. There was strong evidence that duration away from work from both MSK or pain-related conditions and MH conditions were significantly reduced by multi-domain interventions encompassing at least two of the three domains. There was moderate evidence that these multi-domain interventions had a positive impact on cost outcomes. There was strong evidence that cognitive behavioural therapy interventions that do not also include workplace modifications or service coordination components are not effective in helping workers with MH conditions in RTW. Evidence for the effectiveness of other single-domain interventions was mixed, with some studies reporting positive effects and others reporting no effects on lost time and work functioning. Conclusions While there is substantial research literature focused on RTW, there are only a small number of quality workplace-based RTW intervention studies that involve workers with MSK or pain-related conditions and MH conditions. We recommend implementing multi-domain interventions (i.e. with healthcare provision, service coordination, and work accommodation components) to help reduce lost time for MSK or pain-related conditions and MH conditions. Practitioners should also consider implementing these programs to help improve work functioning and reduce costs associated with work disability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K L Cullen
- Institute for Work & Health, 481 University Ave, Toronto, ON, M5G 2E9, Canada.
| | - E Irvin
- Institute for Work & Health, 481 University Ave, Toronto, ON, M5G 2E9, Canada
| | - A Collie
- Institute for Safety Compensation and Recovery Research, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - F Clay
- Institute for Safety Compensation and Recovery Research, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - U Gensby
- National Centre for Occupational Rehabilitation, Rauland, Norway
- Team WorkingLife ApS, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - P A Jennings
- Department of Community Emergency Health and Paramedic Practice, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - S Hogg-Johnson
- Institute for Work & Health, 481 University Ave, Toronto, ON, M5G 2E9, Canada
| | - V Kristman
- Institute for Work & Health, 481 University Ave, Toronto, ON, M5G 2E9, Canada
- Lakehead University, Thunder Bay, ON, Canada
| | - M Laberge
- University of Montreal and CHU Ste-Justine Research Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - D McKenzie
- Institute for Safety Compensation and Recovery Research, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - S Newnam
- Accident Research Centre, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - A Palagyi
- Institute for Safety Compensation and Recovery Research, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - R Ruseckaite
- Institute for Safety Compensation and Recovery Research, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - D M Sheppard
- Accident Research Centre, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - S Shourie
- Accident Research Centre, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - I Steenstra
- Institute for Work & Health, 481 University Ave, Toronto, ON, M5G 2E9, Canada
- Ted Rogers School of Management, Ryerson University, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - D Van Eerd
- Institute for Work & Health, 481 University Ave, Toronto, ON, M5G 2E9, Canada
- School of Public Health and Health Systems, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada
| | - B C Amick
- Institute for Work & Health, 481 University Ave, Toronto, ON, M5G 2E9, Canada
- Robert Stempel College of Public Health and Social Work, Florida International University, Miami, FL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Halonen JI, Solovieva S, Virta LJ, Laaksonen M, Martimo KP, Hiljanen I, Lallukka T, Autti-Rämö I, Viikari-Juntura E. Sustained return to work and work participation after a new legislation obligating employers to notify prolonged sickness absence. Scand J Public Health 2018; 46:65-73. [PMID: 29471755 DOI: 10.1177/1403494817732445] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
AIMS Return to work (RTW) after prolonged sickness absence benefits both the individual and society. However, the effectiveness of legislation aiming to improve RTW remains uncertain. We examined whether sustained RTW and work participation were different before and after a legislative change enacted in 2012 (i.e. an intervention) that obligated employers to give notice of prolonged sickness absence to occupational health services. METHODS Two random samples (2010 and 2013) of the Finnish working aged population (70%, ~2.6 million each) were drawn. Using survival analysis, we assessed sustained RTW (≥28 consecutive working days) during a two-month follow-up after a sickness absence minimum of 30 calendar days in the pre- and post-intervention period. We also identified pathways for RTW with cluster analysis and calculated relative gain in work participation in the total sample and by several population subgroups. RESULTS In the total sample, sustained RTW was 4% higher and the mean time to sustained RTW was 0.42 days shorter in the post- than in the pre-intervention period. The estimates were larger among women than men and among those with mental disorders compared with other diagnoses. Changes in the pathways for sustained RTW indicated a 4.9% relative gain in work participation in the total sample. The gain was larger among those who lived in areas of low unemployment rate (20.6%) or worked in the public sector (11.9%). CONCLUSIONS From 2010 to 2013, RTW and work participation increased among the employees with prolonged sickness absence, suggesting that the legislative change enhanced RTW. The change in work participation varied by population subgroup.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Lauri J Virta
- 2 The Social Insurance Institution of Finland, Finland
| | | | | | - Ismo Hiljanen
- 2 The Social Insurance Institution of Finland, Finland
| | - Tea Lallukka
- 1 Finnish Institute of Occupational Health, Finland
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
42
|
Rise MB, Skagseth M, Klevanger NE, Aasdahl L, Borchgrevink P, Jensen C, Tenggren H, Halsteinli V, Jacobsen TN, Løland SB, Johnsen R, Fimland MS. Design of a study evaluating the effects, health economics, and stakeholder perspectives of a multi-component occupational rehabilitation program with an added workplace intervention - a study protocol. BMC Public Health 2018; 18:219. [PMID: 29402253 PMCID: PMC5800096 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-018-5130-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2017] [Accepted: 01/30/2018] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Recent research has suggested that interventions at the workplace might be the most potent ingredient in return to work interventions, but few studies have investigated the different effects of workplace interventions as part of occupational rehabilitation programs. The comprehensive design described in this article includes effect (on return to work and health outcomes), and health economic evaluations of a workplace intervention added to a multicomponent rehabilitation program. Qualitative and mixed method studies will investigate sick-listed persons', rehabilitation therapists' and employers' perspectives on the usability and outcomes of the rehabilitation program and the workplace intervention. The program and intervention are provided to patients with musculoskeletal, psychological or general and unspecified diagnoses. The program is multi-component and includes Acceptance and Commitment Therapy, physical exercise, patient education and creating a plan for increased work participation. METHODS Persons who are employed, aged from 18 to 60 years, with a current sick leave status of 50% or more and a diagnosis within the musculoskeletal, psychological or general and unspecified chapters of International Classification of Primary Care-2 (ICPC-2) will be recruited to a researcher-blinded parallel-group randomized controlled trial. All participants take part in an in-patient occupational rehabilitation program, while the intervention group also takes part in an intervention at the workplace. The effect and economic evaluation will investigate the effect of the added workplace intervention. The primary outcome measures will be time until full sustainable return to work and total number of sickness absence days in the 12 months after inclusion. Health economic evaluations will investigate the cost-effectiveness and cost-utility. Qualitative studies will investigate rehabilitation therapists' experiences with working towards return to work within an ACT-approach and stakeholders' experiences with the workplace intervention. A mixed methods study will combine quantitative and qualitative findings on the participants' expectations and motivation for return to work. DISCUSSION The outline of this comprehensive study could represent an important addition to the standard designs of return to work evaluation. The mixed methods design, with qualitative approaches as well as a rigorous randomized controlled trial, might prove useful to shed light on contextual factors. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov : NCT02541890 . September 4, 2015.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marit B Rise
- Department of Public Health and Nursing, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway. .,Department of Mental Health, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, 7491, Trondheim, Norway.
| | - Martin Skagseth
- Department of Public Health and Nursing, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Nina E Klevanger
- Department of Public Health and Nursing, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Lene Aasdahl
- Department of Public Health and Nursing, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.,Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, St. Olav's Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Petter Borchgrevink
- Hysnes Rehabilitation Center, Trondheim University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway.,Department of Circulation and Medical Imaging, Faculty of Medicine, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Chris Jensen
- Department of Public Health and Nursing, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.,National Centre for Occupational Rehabilitation, Rauland, Norway
| | - Hanne Tenggren
- Hysnes Rehabilitation Center, Trondheim University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Vidar Halsteinli
- Department of Public Health and Nursing, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Trym N Jacobsen
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, St. Olav's Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway.,Hysnes Rehabilitation Center, Trondheim University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Svein B Løland
- Hysnes Rehabilitation Center, Trondheim University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Roar Johnsen
- Department of Public Health and Nursing, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Marius S Fimland
- Department of Public Health and Nursing, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.,Hysnes Rehabilitation Center, Trondheim University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Rødevand L, Ljosaa TM, Granan LP, Knutzen T, Jacobsen HB, Reme SE. A pilot study of the individual placement and support model for patients with chronic pain. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2017; 18:550. [PMID: 29282028 PMCID: PMC5746000 DOI: 10.1186/s12891-017-1908-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2017] [Accepted: 12/13/2017] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Individual Placement and Support (IPS) is an evidence-based work rehabilitation model with well-documented effects for people with mental illness. The model has, however, never been tested out for people with chronic pain. This pilot study aimed to investigate chronic pain patients’ experiences with the IPS job support model. Methods We recruited eight consecutive patients referred for various chronic pain conditions at a hospital outpatient pain clinic. They were offered IPS job support as an integrated part of their interdisciplinary pain rehabilitation. The patients’ experiences were investigated through semi-structured interviews 3 months after inclusion in the study. Results The participants reported mostly positive experiences with IPS. One participant dropped out of the study after deterioration of symptoms, while the remaining participants were satisfied with the intervention. Particular helpful aspects of the IPS intervention were the follow-up from the employment specialist, focus on competitive employment, focus on work despite pain complaints, reframing work into something positive, administrative support, and practice in writing applications. No participants reported adverse experiences from the IPS intervention. Within a 12-months time frame, 3 of the 8 participants gained competitive employment. Conclusions This is the first report of the IPS model of supported employment applied in an outpatient setting for chronic pain patients. The results suggest that IPS can be successfully integrated with interdisciplinary pain rehabilitation, and warrants large-scale testing in a randomized controlled trial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L Rødevand
- Department of Pain Management and Research, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - T M Ljosaa
- Department of Pain Management and Research, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - L P Granan
- Department of Pain Management and Research, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - T Knutzen
- Department of Pain Management and Research, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - H B Jacobsen
- Department of Pain Management and Research, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - S E Reme
- Department of Pain Management and Research, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway. .,Department of Psychology, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Oslo, Postboks 1094 Blindern, 0317, Oslo, Norway.
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Pedersen P, Nielsen CV, Andersen MH, Langagergaard V, Boes A, Jensen OK, Jensen C, Labriola M. Comparing multidisciplinary and brief intervention in employees with different job relations on sick leave due to low back pain: protocol of a randomised controlled trial. BMC Public Health 2017; 17:959. [PMID: 29246257 PMCID: PMC5732442 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-017-4975-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2017] [Accepted: 12/05/2017] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Low back pain (LBP) is a common problem that affects the lives of many individuals and is a frequent cause of sickness absence. To help this group of individuals resume work, several interventions have been studied. However, not all individuals may profit from the same intervention and the effect of a given intervention on return to work (RTW) may depend on their work situation. The aim of this study is to evaluate whether employees on sick leave due to LBP and with poor job relations will benefit more from a multidisciplinary intervention, while patients with strong job relations will benefit more from a brief intervention. METHODS The study is designed as a randomised controlled trial with up to five years of follow-up comparing brief intervention with brief intervention plus multidisciplinary intervention. Employees, aged 18-60 years, are included in the study from March 2011 to August 2016 if they have been on sick leave for 4-12 weeks due to LBP with or without radiculopathy. They are divided into two groups, a group with poor job relations and a group with strong job relations based on their answers in the baseline questionnaire. Each group is randomised 1:1 to receive the brief intervention or brief intervention plus multidisciplinary intervention. The brief intervention comprises a clinical examination and advice offered by a rheumatologist and a physiotherapist, whereas the supplementary multidisciplinary intervention comprises the assignment of a case manager who draws up a rehabilitation plan in collaboration with the participant and the multidisciplinary team. The primary outcome is duration of sickness absence measured by register data. Secondary outcomes include sustainable RTW and questionnaire-based measures of functional capacity. Outcomes will be assessed at one, two and five years of follow-up. DISCUSSION This trial will evaluate the effect of brief and multidisciplinary intervention on RTW and functional capacity among employees on sick leave due to LBP with poor or strong job relations. This will indicate whether work-related characteristics should be considered when providing treatment of LBP patients in the health care sector. TRIAL REGISTRATION Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN14136384 . Registered 4 August 2015.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Claus Vinther Nielsen
- Section of Clinical Social Medicine and Rehabilitation, Department of Public Health, Aarhus University, P.P. Oerums Gade 11, 1B, Silkeborg, 8600, Aarhus, Denmark.,DEFACTUM, Central Denmark Region, Aarhus, Denmark
| | | | - Vivian Langagergaard
- Spine Center, Diagnostic Center, Silkeborg Regional Hospital, Silkeborg, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Social Medicine & Rehabilitation, The Regional Hospital West Jutland, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Anders Boes
- Spine Center, Diagnostic Center, Silkeborg Regional Hospital, Silkeborg, Denmark
| | - Ole Kudsk Jensen
- Spine Center, Diagnostic Center, Silkeborg Regional Hospital, Silkeborg, Denmark
| | - Chris Jensen
- Department of Public Health and General Practice, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, NTNU, Trondheim, Norway.,National Advisory Unit on Occupational Rehabilitation, Rauland, Norway
| | - Merete Labriola
- Section of Clinical Social Medicine and Rehabilitation, Department of Public Health, Aarhus University, P.P. Oerums Gade 11, 1B, Silkeborg, 8600, Aarhus, Denmark.,DEFACTUM, Central Denmark Region, Aarhus, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Positive experiences of a vocational rehabilitation intervention for individuals on long-term sick leave, the Dirigo project: a qualitative study. BMC Public Health 2017; 17:790. [PMID: 29017504 PMCID: PMC5633870 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-017-4804-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2016] [Accepted: 09/27/2017] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The process of returning to work after long-term sick leave can sometimes be complex. Many factors, (e.g. cooperation between different authorities and the individual as well as individual factors such as health, emotional well-being and self-efficacy) may have an impact on an individual's ability to work. The aim of this study was to investigate clients' experiences with an individually tailored vocational rehabilitation, the Dirigo project, and encounters with professionals working on it. The Dirigo project was based on collaboration between rehabilitation authorities, individually tailored interventions and a motivational interviewing approach. METHODS A descriptive qualitative design was used with data collected through interviews. Fourteen individuals on long-term sick leave took part in individual semi-structured interviews. The interviews were analysed using content analysis. RESULTS The analysis showed overall positive experience of methods and encounters with professionals in a vocational rehabilitation project. The positive experiences were based on four key factors: 1. Opportunities for receiving various dimensions of support. 2. Good overall treatment by the professionals. 3. Satisfaction with the working methods of the project, and 4. Opportunities for personal development. CONCLUSIONS The main result showed that the clients had an overall positive experience of a vocational rehabilitation project and encounters with professionals who used motivational interviewing as a communication method. The overall positive experience indicated that their interactions with the different professionals may have affected their self-efficacy in general and in relation to transition to work. The knowledge is essential for the professionals working in the area of vocational rehabilitation. However, vocational rehabilitation interventions also need a societal approach to be able to offer clients opportunities for job training and real jobs.
Collapse
|
46
|
Suijkerbuijk YB, Schaafsma FG, van Mechelen JC, Ojajärvi A, Corbière M, Anema JR. Interventions for obtaining and maintaining employment in adults with severe mental illness, a network meta-analysis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2017; 9:CD011867. [PMID: 28898402 PMCID: PMC6483771 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd011867.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 82] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND People with severe mental illness show high rates of unemployment and work disability, however, they often have a desire to participate in employment. People with severe mental illness used to be placed in sheltered employment or were enrolled in prevocational training to facilitate transition to a competitive job. Now, there are also interventions focusing on rapid search for a competitive job, with ongoing support to keep the job, known as supported employment. Recently, there has been a growing interest in combining supported employment with other prevocational or psychiatric interventions. OBJECTIVES To assess the comparative effectiveness of various types of vocational rehabilitation interventions and to rank these interventions according to their effectiveness to facilitate competitive employment in adults with severe mental illness. SEARCH METHODS In November 2016 we searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, PsychINFO, and CINAHL, and reference lists of articles for randomised controlled trials and systematic reviews. We identified systematic reviews from which to extract randomised controlled trials. SELECTION CRITERIA We included randomised controlled trials and cluster-randomised controlled trials evaluating the effect of interventions on obtaining competitive employment for adults with severe mental illness. We included trials with competitive employment outcomes. The main intervention groups were prevocational training programmes, transitional employment interventions, supported employment, supported employment augmented with other specific interventions, and psychiatric care only. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two authors independently identified trials, performed data extraction, including adverse events, and assessed trial quality. We performed direct meta-analyses and a network meta-analysis including measurements of the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA). We assessed the quality of the evidence for outcomes within the network meta-analysis according to GRADE. MAIN RESULTS We included 48 randomised controlled trials involving 8743 participants. Of these, 30 studied supported employment, 13 augmented supported employment, 17 prevocational training, and 6 transitional employment. Psychiatric care only was the control condition in 13 studies. Direct comparison meta-analysis of obtaining competitive employmentWe could include 18 trials with short-term follow-up in a direct meta-analysis (N = 2291) of the following comparisons. Supported employment was more effective than prevocational training (RR 2.52, 95% CI 1.21 to 5.24) and transitional employment (RR 3.49, 95% CI 1.77 to 6.89) and prevocational training was more effective than psychiatric care only (RR 8.96, 95% CI 1.77 to 45.51) in obtaining competitive employment.For the long-term follow-up direct meta-analysis, we could include 22 trials (N = 5233). Augmented supported employment (RR 4.32, 95% CI 1.49 to 12.48), supported employment (RR 1.51, 95% CI 1.36 to 1.68) and prevocational training (RR 2.19, 95% CI 1.07 to 4.46) were more effective than psychiatric care only. Augmented supported employment was more effective than supported employment (RR 1.94, 95% CI 1.03 to 3.65), transitional employment (RR 2.45, 95% CI 1.69 to 3.55) and prevocational training (RR 5.42, 95% CI 1.08 to 27.11). Supported employment was more effective than transitional employment (RR 3.28, 95% CI 2.13 to 5.04) and prevocational training (RR 2.31, 95% CI 1.85 to 2.89). Network meta-analysis of obtaining competitive employmentWe could include 22 trials with long-term follow-up in a network meta-analysis.Augmented supported employment was the most effective intervention versus psychiatric care only in obtaining competitive employment (RR 3.81, 95% CI 1.99 to 7.31, SUCRA 98.5, moderate-quality evidence), followed by supported employment (RR 2.72 95% CI 1.55 to 4.76; SUCRA 76.5, low-quality evidence).Prevocational training (RR 1.26, 95% CI 0.73 to 2.19; SUCRA 40.3, very low-quality evidence) and transitional employment were not considerably different from psychiatric care only (RR 1.00,95% CI 0.51 to 1.96; SUCRA 17.2, low-quality evidence) in achieving competitive employment, but prevocational training stood out in the SUCRA value and rank.Augmented supported employment was slightly better than supported employment, but not significantly (RR 1.40, 95% CI 0.92 to 2.14). The SUCRA value and mean rank were higher for augmented supported employment.The results of the network meta-analysis of the intervention subgroups favoured augmented supported employment interventions, but also cognitive training. However, supported employment augmented with symptom-related skills training showed the best results (RR compared to psychiatric care only 3.61 with 95% CI 1.03 to 12.63, SUCRA 80.3).We graded the quality of the evidence of the network ranking as very low because of potential risk of bias in the included studies, inconsistency and publication bias. Direct meta-analysis of maintaining competitive employment Based on the direct meta-analysis of the short-term follow-up of maintaining employment, supported employment was more effective than: psychiatric care only, transitional employment, prevocational training, and augmented supported employment.In the long-term follow-up direct meta-analysis, augmented supported employment was more effective than prevocational training (MD 22.79 weeks, 95% CI 15.96 to 29.62) and supported employment (MD 10.09, 95% CI 0.32 to 19.85) in maintaining competitive employment. Participants receiving supported employment worked more weeks than those receiving transitional employment (MD 17.36, 95% CI 11.53 to 23.18) or prevocational training (MD 11.56, 95% CI 5.99 to 17.13).We did not find differences between interventions in the risk of dropouts or hospital admissions. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Supported employment and augmented supported employment were the most effective interventions for people with severe mental illness in terms of obtaining and maintaining employment, based on both the direct comparison analysis and the network meta-analysis, without increasing the risk of adverse events. These results are based on moderate- to low-quality evidence, meaning that future studies with lower risk of bias could change these results. Augmented supported employment may be slightly more effective compared to supported employment alone. However, this difference was small, based on the direct comparison analysis, and further decreased with the network meta-analysis meaning that this difference should be interpreted cautiously. More studies on maintaining competitive employment are needed to get a better understanding of whether the costs and efforts are worthwhile in the long term for both the individual and society.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yvonne B Suijkerbuijk
- VU University Medical CenterDepartment of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam Public Health Research InstituteVan der Boechorststraat 7Postbus 7057AmsterdamNetherlands1007 MB
- AMC‐UMCG‐UWV‐VUmcResearch Centre for Insurance MedicineAmsterdamNetherlands
| | - Frederieke G Schaafsma
- VU University Medical CenterDepartment of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam Public Health Research InstituteVan der Boechorststraat 7Postbus 7057AmsterdamNetherlands1007 MB
- AMC‐UMCG‐UWV‐VUmcResearch Centre for Insurance MedicineAmsterdamNetherlands
| | - Joost C van Mechelen
- VU University Medical CenterDepartment of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam Public Health Research InstituteVan der Boechorststraat 7Postbus 7057AmsterdamNetherlands1007 MB
| | - Anneli Ojajärvi
- Finnish Institute of Occupational HealthTopeliuksenkatu 41 a AHelsinkiFinlandFI‐00250
| | - Marc Corbière
- Université du Québec à Montréal (UQAM)Department of Education and Pedagogy ‐ Career CounselingMontrealQCCanada
- Centre de recherche de l'Institut universitaire en santé mentale de Montréal (CR‐IUSMM)MontrealCanada
| | - Johannes R Anema
- VU University Medical CenterDepartment of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam Public Health Research InstituteVan der Boechorststraat 7Postbus 7057AmsterdamNetherlands1007 MB
- AMC‐UMCG‐UWV‐VUmcResearch Centre for Insurance MedicineAmsterdamNetherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
47
|
Aasdahl L, Pape K, Vasseljen O, Johnsen R, Gismervik S, Jensen C, Fimland MS. Effects of Inpatient Multicomponent Occupational Rehabilitation versus Less Comprehensive Outpatient Rehabilitation on Somatic and Mental Health: Secondary Outcomes of a Randomized Clinical Trial. JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL REHABILITATION 2017; 27:456-466. [PMID: 27815771 PMCID: PMC5591353 DOI: 10.1007/s10926-016-9679-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/30/2023]
Abstract
Purpose To evaluate effects on somatic and mental health of a multicomponent inpatient occupational rehabilitation program compared to a less comprehensive outpatient program in individuals on sick leave for musculoskeletal complaints or mental health disorders. Methods A randomized clinical trial with parallel groups. Participants were individuals on sick-leave for 2-12 months with a sick-leave diagnosis within the musculoskeletal, psychological or general and unspecified chapters of ICPC-2. Potential participants were identified in the Social Security System Registry. The multicomponent inpatient program (4 + 4 days) consisted of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy, physical training and work-related problem-solving including creating a return to work plan and a workplace visit if considered relevant. The comparative outpatient program consisted primarily of ACT (6 sessions during 6 weeks). Self-reported health-related quality of life, subjective health complaints, pain and anxiety and depression symptoms were assessed up to 12 months after the program. Results 168 individuals were randomized to the multicomponent inpatient program (n = 92) or the outpatient program (n = 76). Linear mixed models showed no statistically significant differences between the programs, except for slightly more reduced pain after the outpatient program. Conclusions This study presents no support that a 4 + 4 days multicomponent inpatient rehabilitation program is superior to a less comprehensive outpatient program, in improving health outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lene Aasdahl
- Department of Public Health and General Practice, Faculty of Medicine, NTNU, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
| | - Kristine Pape
- Department of Public Health and General Practice, Faculty of Medicine, NTNU, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Ottar Vasseljen
- Department of Public Health and General Practice, Faculty of Medicine, NTNU, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Roar Johnsen
- Department of Public Health and General Practice, Faculty of Medicine, NTNU, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Sigmund Gismervik
- Department of Public Health and General Practice, Faculty of Medicine, NTNU, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, St. Olavs Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Chris Jensen
- Department of Public Health and General Practice, Faculty of Medicine, NTNU, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
- National Center for Occupational Rehabilitation, Rauland, Norway
| | - Marius Steiro Fimland
- Department of Public Health and General Practice, Faculty of Medicine, NTNU, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
- Hysnes Rehabilitation Center, St. Olavs Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Pedersen P, Nielsen CV, Jensen OK, Jensen C, Labriola M. Employment status five years after a randomised controlled trial comparing multidisciplinary and brief intervention in employees on sick leave due to low back pain. Scand J Public Health 2017; 46:383-388. [PMID: 28767002 DOI: 10.1177/1403494817722290] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
AIMS To evaluate differences in employment status, during a five-year follow-up period in patients on sick leave due to low back pain who had participated in a trial comparing a brief and a multidisciplinary intervention. METHODS From 2004 to 2008, 535 patients were referred to the Spine Centre at the Regional Hospital in Silkeborg if they had been on sick leave for 3-16 weeks due to low back pain. All patients underwent a clinical examination by a rehabilitation physician and a physiotherapist, and were randomised to either the brief intervention or the multidisciplinary intervention. The outcome was employment status from randomisation to five years of follow-up and was measured by the mean number of weeks in four different groups of employment status (sequence analysis) and a fraction of the number of weeks working (work participation score) that were accumulated over the years. RESULTS A total of 231 patients were randomised to the brief intervention and 233 patients to the multidisciplinary intervention. No statistically significant differences in the mean weeks spent within the different employment statuses were found between the two intervention groups. After five years of follow-up, participants in the multidisciplinary intervention had a 19% higher risk of not having a work participation score above 75% compared to participants in the brief intervention. CONCLUSIONS After five years of follow-up no differences in employment status were found between participants in the brief and the multidisciplinary intervention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Claus Vinther Nielsen
- 1 DEFACTUM, Central Denmark Region, Denmark.,2 Section of Clinical Social Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Aarhus, Denmark
| | | | - Chris Jensen
- 4 Department of Public Health and General Practice, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Norway.,5 National Centre for Occupational Rehabilitation, Norway
| | - Merete Labriola
- 1 DEFACTUM, Central Denmark Region, Denmark.,2 Section of Clinical Social Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Aarhus, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Shanthanna H, Gilron I, Rajarathinam M, AlAmri R, Kamath S, Thabane L, Devereaux PJ, Bhandari M. Benefits and safety of gabapentinoids in chronic low back pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. PLoS Med 2017; 14:e1002369. [PMID: 28809936 PMCID: PMC5557428 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002369] [Citation(s) in RCA: 92] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2017] [Accepted: 07/06/2017] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE Chronic Low Back Pain (CLBP) is very common, with a lifetime prevalence between 51% and 80%. In majority, it is nonspecific in nature and multifactorial in etiology. Pregabalin (PG) and Gabapentin (GB) are gabapentinoids that have demonstrated benefit in neuropathic pain conditions. Despite no clear rationale, they are increasingly used for nonspecific CLBP. They necessitate prolonged use and are associated with adverse effects and increased cost. Recent guidelines from the National Health Service (NHS), England, expressed concerns on their off-label use, in addition to the risk of misuse. We aimed to assess the effectiveness and safety of gabapentinoids in adult CLBP patients. METHODS Electronic databases of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane were searched from their inception until December 20th, 2016. We included randomized control trials reporting the use of gabapentinoids for the treatment of CLBP of >3 months duration, in adult patients. Study selection and data extraction was performed independently by paired reviewers. Outcomes were guided by Initiative on Methods, Measurement and Pain Assessment in Clinical Trials guidelines, with pain relief and safety as the primary outcomes. Meta-analyses were performed for outcomes reported in 3 or more studies. Outcomes were reported as mean differences (MDs) or risk ratios (RRs) with their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs), and I2 in percentage representing the percentage variability in effect estimates that could be explained by heterogeneity. GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) was used to assess the quality of evidence. RESULTS Out of 1,385 citations, eight studies were included. Based on the interventions and comparators, studies were analyzed in 3 different groups. GB compared with placebo (3 studies, n = 185) showed minimal improvement of pain (MD = 0.22 units, 95% CI [-0.5 to 0.07] I2 = 0%; GRADE: very low). Three studies compared PG with other types of analgesic medication (n = 332) and showed greater improvement in the other analgesic group (MD = 0.42 units, 95% CI [0.20 to 0.64] I2 = 0; GRADE: very low). Studies using PG as an adjuvant (n = 423) were not pooled due to heterogeneity, but the largest of them showed no benefit of adding PG to tapentadol. There were no deaths or hospitalizations reported. Compared with placebo, the following adverse events were more commonly reported with GB: dizziness-(RR = 1.99, 95% CI [1.17 to 3.37], I2 = 49); fatigue (RR = 1.85, 95% CI [1.12 to 3.05], I2 = 0); difficulties with mentation (RR = 3.34, 95% CI [1.54 to 7.25], I2 = 0); and visual disturbances (RR = 5.72, 95% CI [1.94 to 16.91], I2 = 0). The number needed to harm with 95% CI for dizziness, fatigue, difficulties with mentation, and visual disturbances were 7 (4 to 30), 8 (4 to 44), 6 (4 to 15), and 6 (4 to 13) respectively. The GRADE evidence quality was noted to be very low for dizziness and fatigue, low for difficulties with mentation, and moderate for visual disturbances. Functional and emotional improvements were reported by few studies and showed no significant improvements. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Existing evidence on the use of gabapentinoids in CLBP is limited and demonstrates significant risk of adverse effects without any demonstrated benefit. Given the lack of efficacy, risks, and costs associated, the use of gabapentinoids for CLBP merits caution. There is need for large high-quality trials to more definitively inform this issue. TRIAL REGISTRATION PROSPERO CRD42016034040.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Harsha Shanthanna
- Department of Anesthesiology, St Joseph's Healthcare, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.,Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Ian Gilron
- Departments of Anesthesiology & Perioperative Medicine and Biomedical & Molecular Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
| | - Manikandan Rajarathinam
- Department of Anesthesiology, St Joseph's Healthcare, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Rizq AlAmri
- Department of Anesthesiology, St Joseph's Healthcare, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Sriganesh Kamath
- Department of Anesthesiology, St Joseph's Healthcare, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.,Department of Neuroanesthesia, National Institute of Mental Health and Neuro Sciences, Bangalore, India
| | - Lehana Thabane
- Department of Anesthesiology, St Joseph's Healthcare, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.,Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.,Biostatistics Unit, St Joseph's Healthcare, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Philip J Devereaux
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.,Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Mohit Bhandari
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.,Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Improving the effectiveness of sickness benefit case management through a public-private partnership? A difference-in-difference analysis in eighteen Danish municipalities. BMC Public Health 2017; 17:329. [PMID: 28420369 PMCID: PMC5395754 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-017-4236-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2016] [Accepted: 04/06/2017] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The aim of this study was to investigate whether a multidimensional public-private partnership intervention, focussing on improving the quality and efficiency of sickness benefit case management, reduced the sickness benefit duration and the duration until self-support. Methods We used a difference-in-difference (DID) design with six intervention municipalities and 12 matched control municipalities in Denmark. The study sample comprised 282,103 sickness benefit spells exceeding four weeks. The intervention group with 110,291 spells received the intervention, and the control group with 171,812 spells received ordinary sickness benefit case management. Using register data, we fitted Cox proportional hazard ratio models, estimating hazard ratios (HR) and confidence intervals (CI). Results We found no joint effect of the intervention on the sickness benefit duration (HR 1.02, CI 0.97–1.07) or the duration until self-support (HR 0.99, CI 0.96–1.02). The effect varied among the six municipalities, with sickness benefit HRs ranging from 0.96 (CI 0.93–1.00) to 1.13 (CI 1.08–1.18) and self-support HRs ranging from 0.91 (CI 0.82–1.00) to 1.11 (CI 1.06–1.17). Conclusions Compared to receiving ordinary sickness benefit management the intervention had on average no effect on the sickness benefit duration or duration until self-support. However, the effect varied considerably among the six municipalities possibly due to differences in the implementation or the complexity of the intervention. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12889-017-4236-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
|