1
|
Gill RK, Droney J, Owen G, Riley J, Stephenson L. Digital advance care planning with severe mental illness: a retrospective observational cohort analysis of the use of an electronic palliative care coordination system. BMC Palliat Care 2024; 23:56. [PMID: 38403633 PMCID: PMC10895857 DOI: 10.1186/s12904-024-01381-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2024] [Accepted: 02/12/2024] [Indexed: 02/27/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND People living with severe mental illness (SMI) face significant health inequalities, including in palliative care. Advance Care Planning (ACP) is widely recommended by palliative care experts and could reduce inequalities. However, implementing ACP with this group is challenging. Electronic Palliative Care Coordination Systems such as Coordinate my Care (CMC) have been introduced to support documentation and sharing of ACP records with relevant healthcare providers. This study explores the use of CMC amongst those with SMI and aims to describe how those with a primary diagnosis of SMI who have used CMC for ACP, and makes recommendations for future research and policy. METHOD A retrospective observational cohort analysis was completed of CMC records created 01/01/2010-31/09/2021 where the service user had a primary diagnosis of SMI, with no exclusions based on comorbidities. Descriptive statistics were used to report on characteristics including: age, diagnosis, individual prognosis and resuscitation status. Thematic analysis was used to report on the content of patients' statements of preference. RESULTS 1826 records were identified. Of this sample most (60.1%) had capacity to make treatment decisions, 47.8% were aged under 70, 86.7% were given a prognosis of 'years' and most (63.1%) remained for full cardio-pulmonary resuscitation in the event of cardio-pulmonary arrest. Records with completed statements of preferences (20.3%) contained information about preferences for physical and mental health treatment care as well as information about patient presentation and capacity, although most were brief and lacked expression of patient voice. DISCUSSION Compared to usual CMC users, the cohort of interest are relatively able, younger people using CMC to make long-term plans for active physical and mental health treatment. ADM is a service user-driven process, and so it was expected that authentic patient voice would be expressed within statements of preference, however this was mostly not achieved. CONCLUSIONS This digital tool is being used by people with SMI but to plan for more than palliative care. This cohort and supporting professionals have used CMC to plan for longer term physical and mental healthcare. Future research and policy should focus on development of tailored digital tools for people with SMI to plan for palliative, physical and mental healthcare and support expression of patient voice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rea Kaur Gill
- Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, 16 De Crespigny Park, London, SE5 8AB, UK.
| | - Joanne Droney
- The Royal Marsden, Fulham Road, London, SW3 6JJ, UK
- Imperial College London, Exhibition Road South Kensington, London, SW7 2BX, UK
| | - Gareth Owen
- Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, 16 De Crespigny Park, London, SE5 8AB, UK
| | - Julia Riley
- Imperial College London, Exhibition Road South Kensington, London, SW7 2BX, UK
- South Central and West Commissioning Support, 18-20 Massett Road, Horley, RH6 7DE, UK
| | - Lucy Stephenson
- Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, 16 De Crespigny Park, London, SE5 8AB, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Mendoza-Jiménez MJ, van Exel J, Brouwer W. On spillovers in economic evaluations: definition, mapping review and research agenda. THE EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS : HEPAC : HEALTH ECONOMICS IN PREVENTION AND CARE 2024:10.1007/s10198-023-01658-8. [PMID: 38261132 DOI: 10.1007/s10198-023-01658-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/12/2023] [Accepted: 12/05/2023] [Indexed: 01/24/2024]
Abstract
An important issue in economic evaluations is determining whether all relevant impacts are considered, given the perspective chosen for the analysis. Acknowledging that patients are not isolated individuals has important implications in this context. Increasingly, the term "spillovers" is used to label consequences of health interventions on others. However, a clear definition of spillovers is lacking, and as a result, the scope of the concept remains unclear. In this study, we aim to clarify the concept of spillovers by proposing a definition applicable in health economic evaluations. To illustrate the implications of this definition, we highlight the diversity of potential spillovers through an expanded impact inventory and conduct a mapping review that outlines the evidence base for the different types of spillovers. In the context of economic evaluations of health interventions, we define spillovers as all impacts from an intervention on all parties or entities other than the users of the intervention under evaluation. This definition encompasses a broader range of potential costs and effects, beyond informal caregivers and family members. The expanded impact inventory enables a systematic approach to identifying broader impacts of health interventions. The mapping review shows that the relevance of different types of spillovers is context-specific. Some spillovers are regularly included in economic evaluations, although not always recognised as such, while others are not. A consistent use of the term "spillovers", improved measurement of these costs and effects, and increased transparency in reporting them are still necessary. To that end, we propose a research agenda.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- María J Mendoza-Jiménez
- Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management (ESHPM), Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
- Erasmus Centre for Health Economics Rotterdam (EsCHER), Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
- Facultad de Ciencias Sociales y Humanísticas, Escuela Superior Politécnica del Litoral (ESPOL), Guayaquil, Ecuador.
| | - Job van Exel
- Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management (ESHPM), Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Erasmus Centre for Health Economics Rotterdam (EsCHER), Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Werner Brouwer
- Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management (ESHPM), Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Erasmus Centre for Health Economics Rotterdam (EsCHER), Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Clibbens N, Booth A, Sharda L, Baker J, Thompson J, Ashman M, Berzins K, Weich S, Kendal S. Explaining context, mechanism and outcome in adult community mental health crisis care: A realist evidence synthesis. Int J Ment Health Nurs 2023; 32:1636-1653. [PMID: 37574714 DOI: 10.1111/inm.13204] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/12/2023] [Revised: 07/25/2023] [Accepted: 08/01/2023] [Indexed: 08/15/2023]
Abstract
Mental health crises cause significant distress and disruption to the lives of individuals and their families. Community crisis care systems are complex, often hard to navigate and poorly understood. This realist evidence synthesis aimed to explain how, for whom and in what circumstances community mental health crisis services for adults work to resolve crises and is reported according to RAMESES guidelines. Using realist methodology, initial programme theories were identified and then tested through iterative evidence searching across 10 electronic databases, four expert stakeholder consultations and n = 20 individual interviews. 45 relevant records informed the three initial programme theories, and 77 documents, were included in programme theory testing. 39 context, mechanism, outcome configurations were meta-synthesized into three themes: (1) The gateway to urgent support; (2) Values based crisis interventions and (3) Leadership and organizational values. Fragmented cross-agency responses exacerbated staff stress and created barriers to access. Services should focus on evaluating interagency working to improve staff role clarity and ensure boundaries between services are planned for. Organizations experienced as compassionate contributed positively to perceived accessibility but relied on compassionate leadership. Attending to the support needs of staff and the proximity of leaders to the front line of crisis care are key. Designing interventions that are easy to navigate, prioritize shared decision-making and reduce the risk of re-traumatizing people is a priority.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Andrew Booth
- School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Leila Sharda
- School of Healthcare, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - John Baker
- School of Healthcare, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Jill Thompson
- Health Sciences School, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | | | | | - Scott Weich
- School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Sarah Kendal
- School of Healthcare, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Cassivi C, Sergerie-Richard S, Saint-Pierre B, Goulet MH. Crisis plans in mental health: A scoping review. Int J Ment Health Nurs 2023; 32:1259-1273. [PMID: 37098744 DOI: 10.1111/inm.13158] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2022] [Revised: 04/09/2023] [Accepted: 04/12/2023] [Indexed: 04/27/2023]
Abstract
Crisis situations are frequent among people with mental health disorders. Several interventions have been developed to act in prevention, including crisis plans recognized as particularly effective in reducing coercive measures. In the literature, several models of crisis plans are proposed with similar aims and contents. Based on the methodology proposed by the Joanna Briggs Institute, a scoping review was conducted to map the state of knowledge on crisis plans in adult mental health settings. The literature search conducted on six databases (CINAHL, PubMed, Medline, EMBASE, PsychINFO and Cochrane) yielded 2435 articles. Of these, 122 full-text articles were assessed for eligibility, and 78 met the inclusion criteria. Studies were critically appraised using the Joanna Briggs Institute appraisal tools, and data were extracted by two independent reviewers. Content analysis identified a typology of crisis plans: (1) the legal crisis plan and (2) the formal crisis plan. Five modalities were identified for its completion: the sections, the moment, the completion steps, the people involved and the training of key actors. Most identified outcomes are consistent with the main purpose of the intervention, which is crisis prevention. However, the most identified outcomes focused on the service user's recovery and indicated that crisis plans could provide an opportunity to operationalize recovery in mental healthcare, thus suggesting an evolution in the aim of the intervention. Future research should further focus on the modalities of crisis plans to guide the implementation in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christine Cassivi
- Faculty of Nursing, University of Montréal, Québec, Montréal, Canada
- Centre de recherche de l'Institut universitaire en santé mentale de Montréal (CRIUSMM), Québec, Montréal, Canada
| | - Sophie Sergerie-Richard
- Faculty of Nursing, University of Montréal, Québec, Montréal, Canada
- Institut universitaire en santé mentale de Montréal (IUSMM), Québec, Montréal, Canada
| | - Benoît Saint-Pierre
- Centre intégré universitaire de Santé et Services Sociaux du Centre-Sud-de-l'Île-de-Montréal, Québec, Montréal, Canada
| | - Marie-Hélène Goulet
- Faculty of Nursing, University of Montréal, Québec, Montréal, Canada
- Centre de recherche de l'Institut universitaire en santé mentale de Montréal (CRIUSMM), Québec, Montréal, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Clibbens N, Baker J, Booth A, Berzins K, Ashman MC, Sharda L, Thompson J, Kendal S, Weich S. Explanation of context, mechanisms and outcomes in adult community mental health crisis care: the MH-CREST realist evidence synthesis. HEALTH AND SOCIAL CARE DELIVERY RESEARCH 2023; 11:1-161. [PMID: 37837344 DOI: 10.3310/twkk5110] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/16/2023]
Abstract
Background Mental health crises cause significant disruption to individuals and families and can be life-threatening. The large number of community crisis services operating in an inter-agency landscape complicates access to help. It is unclear which underpinning mechanisms of crisis care work, for whom and in which circumstances. Aim The aim was to identify mechanisms to explain how, for whom and in what circumstances adult community crisis services work. Objectives The objectives were to develop, test and synthesise programme theories via (1) stakeholder expertise and current evidence; (2) a context, intervention, mechanism and outcome framework; (3) consultation with experts; (4) development of pen portraits; (5) synthesis and refinement of programme theories, including mid-range theory; and (6) identification and dissemination of mechanisms needed to trigger desired context-specific crisis outcomes. Design This study is a realist evidence synthesis, comprising (1) identification of initial programme theories; (2) prioritisation, testing and refinement of programme theories; (3) focused realist reviews of prioritised initial programme theories; and (4) synthesis to mid-range theory. Main outcome The main outcome was to explain context, mechanisms and outcomes in adult community mental health crisis care. Data sources Data were sourced via academic and grey literature searches, expert stakeholder group consultations and 20 individual realist interviews with experts. Review methods A realist evidence synthesis with primary data was conducted to test and refine three initial programme theories: (1) urgent and accessible crisis care, (2) compassionate and therapeutic crisis care and (3) inter-agency working. Results Community crisis services operate best within an inter-agency system. This requires compassionate leadership and shared values that enable staff to be supported; retain their compassion; and, in turn, facilitate compassionate interventions for people in crisis. The complex interface between agencies is best managed through greater clarity at the boundaries of services, making referral and transition seamless and timely. This would facilitate ease of access and guaranteed responses that are trusted by the communities they serve. Strengths and limitations Strengths include the identification of mechanisms for effective inter-agency community crisis care and meaningful stakeholder consultation that grounded the theories in real-life experience. Limitations include the evidence being heavily weighted towards England and the review scope excluding full analysis of ethnic and cultural diversity. Conclusions Multiple interpretations of crises and diverse population needs present challenges for improving the complex pathways to help in a crisis. Inter-agency working requires clear policy guidance with local commissioning. Seamless transitions between services generate trust through guaranteed responses and ease of navigation. This is best achieved where there is inter-agency affiliation that supports co-production. Compassionate leaders engender staff trust, and outcomes for people in crisis improve when staff are supported to retain their compassion. Future work Further work might explore inter-agency models of crisis delivery, particularly in rural communities. Future work could focus on evaluating outcomes across crisis care provider agencies and include evaluation of individual, as well as service-level, outcomes. The implementation and effect of mental health triage could be explored further, including via telehealth. Barriers to access for marginalised populations warrant a specific focus in future research. Study registration The study is registered as PROSPERO CRD42019141680. Funding This project was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health and Social Care Delivery Research programme and will be published in full in Health and Social Care Delivery Research; Vol. 11, No. 15. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - John Baker
- School of Healthcare, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Andrew Booth
- School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | | | | | - Leila Sharda
- School of Healthcare, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Jill Thompson
- Health Sciences School, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Sarah Kendal
- School of Healthcare, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Scott Weich
- Sheffield Health and Social Care NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Babatunde A, Ruck Keene A, Simpson A, Gilbert S, Stephenson L, Chua KC, Owen G, Simpson AJ, Smith S, Henderson C. Advance Statements for Black African and Caribbean people (AdStAC): protocol for an implementation study. BMC Psychiatry 2023; 23:344. [PMID: 37198589 DOI: 10.1186/s12888-023-04825-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2023] [Accepted: 04/27/2023] [Indexed: 05/19/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The UK government committed to legislating for Advance Choice Documents/Advance Statements (ACD/AS) following their recommendation by the Independent Review of the MHA (2018). ACDs/AS are yet to be implemented in routine practice despite evidence and high demand; they are associated with improved therapeutic relationships and a reduction (25%, RR 0.75, CI 0.61-0.93) in compulsory psychiatric admission. Barriers to their implementation are well documented, ranging from low knowledge levels to logistical challenges in accessing the content during episodes of acute care. In the UK this is an issue for Black people, who experience detention rates disproportionately (over three times) higher than those of White British people and have poorer care experiences and outcomes. ACDs/AS allow for Black people to have their concerns heard by mental health professionals in a care system where they often feel their views are ignored. AdStAC aims to improve Black service users' experiences in mental health services in South London by co-producing and testing an ACD/AS implementation resource with Black service users, mental health professionals and carers/supporters of Black service users. METHODS/DESIGN The study will take place in South London, England over three phases: 1) formative work through stakeholder workshops; 2) co-production of resources through a consensus development exercise and working groups; and 3) testing of the resources using quality improvement (QI) methods. A lived experience advisory group, staff advisory group and project steering committee will support the study throughout. The implementation resources will comprise: advance choice document/advance statement (ACD/AS) documentation, stakeholder trainings, a manual for mental health professionals to facilitate the processes of creating and revising advance statements, and informatics development. DISCUSSION The implementation resources will help increase the likelihood of the new mental health legislation in England being implemented effectively; through aligning evidence-based medicine, policy and law to effectively provide positive clinical, social and financial outcomes for Black people, the National Health Service (NHS) and wider society. This study will likely benefit a wider group of people with severe mental illness, as when marginalised groups who are least engaged, can be supported with these strategies, then the strategies are likely to work for others.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abigail Babatunde
- Health Services and Population Research Department, David Goldberg Centre, King's College London Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, De Crespigny Park, London, SE5 8AF, UK.
| | - Alex Ruck Keene
- Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, 39 Essex Chambers, London, UK
| | - Alan Simpson
- Health Services and Population Research Department, David Goldberg Centre, King's College London Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, De Crespigny Park, London, SE5 8AF, UK
| | - Steven Gilbert
- Steve Gilbert Consulting, Blackthorn House, St Pauls Square, Birmingham, BC 1RL, UK
| | - Lucy Stephenson
- Department of Psychological Medicine, King's College London Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, De Crespigny Park, London, SE5 8AF , UK
| | - Kia-Chong Chua
- Health Services and Population Research Department, David Goldberg Centre, King's College London Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, De Crespigny Park, London, SE5 8AF, UK
| | - Gareth Owen
- Department of Psychological Medicine, King's College London Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, De Crespigny Park, London, SE5 8AF , UK
| | - Adelabu Jonathan Simpson
- Health Services and Population Research Department, David Goldberg Centre, King's College London Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, De Crespigny Park, London, SE5 8AF, UK
| | | | - Claire Henderson
- Health Services and Population Research Department, David Goldberg Centre, King's College London Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, De Crespigny Park, London, SE5 8AF, UK
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Loubière S, Loundou A, Auquier P, Tinland A. Psychiatric advance directives facilitated by peer workers among people with mental illness: economic evaluation of a randomized controlled trial (DAiP study). Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci 2023; 32:e27. [PMID: 37096868 PMCID: PMC10130836 DOI: 10.1017/s2045796023000197] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/26/2023] Open
Abstract
AIMS We aimed to assess the cost-effectiveness of psychiatric advance directives (PAD) facilitated by peer workers (PW-PAD) in the management of patients with mental disorders in France. METHODS In a prospective multicentre randomized controlled trial, we randomly assigned adults with a Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, fifth edition diagnosis of schizophrenia, bipolar I disorder or schizoaffective disorders, who were compulsorily hospitalized in the past 12 months, to either fill out a PAD form and meet a peer worker for facilitation or receive usual care. We assessed differences in societal costs in euros (€) and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) over a year-long follow-up to estimate the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of the PW-PAD strategy. We conducted multiple sensitivity analyses to assess the robustness of our results. RESULTS Among the 394 randomized participants, 196 were assigned to the PW-PAD group and 198 to the control group. Psychiatric inpatient costs were lower in the PW-PAD group than the control group (relative risk, -0.22; 95% confidence interval, [-0.33 to -0.11]; P < 0.001), and 1-year cumulative savings were obtained for the PW-PAD group (mean difference, -€4,286 [-4,711 to -4,020]). Twelve months after PW-PAD implementation, we observed improved health utilities (difference, 0.040 [0.003-0.077]; P = 0.032). Three deaths occurred. QALYs were higher in the PW-PAD group (difference, 0.045 [0.040-0.046]). In all sensitivity analyses, taking into account sampling uncertainty and unit variable variation, PW-PAD was likely to remain a cost-effective use of resources. CONCLUSION PW-PAD was strictly dominant, that is, less expensive and more effective compared with usual care for people living with mental illness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Loubière
- Department of Clinical Research and Innovation, Support Unit for Clinical Research and Economic Evaluation, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Marseille, Marseille, France
- Health Service Research and Quality of Life Center (UR 3279), Aix-Marseille University, School of Medicine, Marseille, France
| | - A Loundou
- Department of Clinical Research and Innovation, Support Unit for Clinical Research and Economic Evaluation, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Marseille, Marseille, France
- Health Service Research and Quality of Life Center (UR 3279), Aix-Marseille University, School of Medicine, Marseille, France
| | - P Auquier
- Department of Clinical Research and Innovation, Support Unit for Clinical Research and Economic Evaluation, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Marseille, Marseille, France
- Health Service Research and Quality of Life Center (UR 3279), Aix-Marseille University, School of Medicine, Marseille, France
| | - A Tinland
- Health Service Research and Quality of Life Center (UR 3279), Aix-Marseille University, School of Medicine, Marseille, France
- Department of Psychiatry, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Marseille, Marseille, France
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Aoki Y, Yaju Y, Utsumi T, Sanyaolu L, Storm M, Takaesu Y, Watanabe K, Watanabe N, Duncan E, Edwards AG. Shared decision-making interventions for people with mental health conditions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2022; 11:CD007297. [PMID: 36367232 PMCID: PMC9650912 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd007297.pub3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND One person in every four will suffer from a diagnosable mental health condition during their life. Such conditions can have a devastating impact on the lives of the individual and their family, as well as society. International healthcare policy makers have increasingly advocated and enshrined partnership models of mental health care. Shared decision-making (SDM) is one such partnership approach. Shared decision-making is a form of service user-provider communication where both parties are acknowledged to bring expertise to the process and work in partnership to make a decision. This review assesses whether SDM interventions improve a range of outcomes. This is the first update of this Cochrane Review, first published in 2010. OBJECTIVES To assess the effects of SDM interventions for people of all ages with mental health conditions, directed at people with mental health conditions, carers, or healthcare professionals, on a range of outcomes including: clinical outcomes, participation/involvement in decision-making process (observations on the process of SDM; user-reported, SDM-specific outcomes of encounters), recovery, satisfaction, knowledge, treatment/medication continuation, health service outcomes, and adverse outcomes. SEARCH METHODS We ran searches in January 2020 in CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, and PsycINFO (2009 to January 2020). We also searched trial registers and the bibliographies of relevant papers, and contacted authors of included studies. We updated the searches in February 2022. When we identified studies as potentially relevant, we labelled these as studies awaiting classification. SELECTION CRITERIA Randomised controlled trials (RCTs), including cluster-randomised controlled trials, of SDM interventions in people with mental health conditions (by Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) or International Classification of Diseases (ICD) criteria). DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS We used standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane. Two review authors independently screened citations for inclusion, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias. We used GRADE to assess the certainty of the evidence. MAIN RESULTS This updated review included 13 new studies, for a total of 15 RCTs. Most participants were adults with severe mental illnesses such as schizophrenia, depression, and bipolar disorder, in higher-income countries. None of the studies included children or adolescents. Primary outcomes We are uncertain whether SDM interventions improve clinical outcomes, such as psychiatric symptoms, depression, anxiety, and readmission, compared with control due to very low-certainty evidence. For readmission, we conducted subgroup analysis between studies that used usual care and those that used cognitive training in the control group. There were no subgroup differences. Regarding participation (by the person with the mental health condition) or level of involvement in the decision-making process, we are uncertain if SDM interventions improve observations on the process of SDM compared with no intervention due to very low-certainty evidence. On the other hand, SDM interventions may improve SDM-specific user-reported outcomes from encounters immediately after intervention compared with no intervention (standardised mean difference (SMD) 0.63, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.26 to 1.01; 3 studies, 534 participants; low-certainty evidence). However, there was insufficient evidence for sustained participation or involvement in the decision-making processes. Secondary outcomes We are uncertain whether SDM interventions improve recovery compared with no intervention due to very low-certainty evidence. We are uncertain if SDM interventions improve users' overall satisfaction. However, one study (241 participants) showed that SDM interventions probably improve some aspects of users' satisfaction with received information compared with no intervention: information given was rated as helpful (risk ratio (RR) 1.33, 95% CI 1.08 to 1.65); participants expressed a strong desire to receive information this way for other treatment decisions (RR 1.35, 95% CI 1.08 to 1.68); and strongly recommended the information be shared with others in this way (RR 1.32, 95% CI 1.11 to 1.58). The evidence was of moderate certainty for these outcomes. However, this same study reported there may be little or no effect on amount or clarity of information, while another small study reported there may be little or no change in carer satisfaction with the SDM intervention. The effects of healthcare professional satisfaction were mixed: SDM interventions may have little or no effect on healthcare professional satisfaction when measured continuously, but probably improve healthcare professional satisfaction when assessed categorically. We are uncertain whether SDM interventions improve knowledge, treatment continuation assessed through clinic visits, medication continuation, carer participation, and the relationship between users and healthcare professionals because of very low-certainty evidence. Regarding length of consultation, SDM interventions probably have little or no effect compared with no intervention (SDM 0.09, 95% CI -0.24 to 0.41; 2 studies, 282 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). On the other hand, we are uncertain whether SDM interventions improve length of hospital stay due to very low-certainty evidence. There were no adverse effects on health outcomes and no other adverse events reported. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS This review update suggests that people exposed to SDM interventions may perceive greater levels of involvement immediately after an encounter compared with those in control groups. Moreover, SDM interventions probably have little or no effect on the length of consultations. Overall we found that most evidence was of low or very low certainty, meaning there is a generally low level of certainty about the effects of SDM interventions based on the studies assembled thus far. There is a need for further research in this area.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yumi Aoki
- Department of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing, Graduate School of Nursing Science, St. Luke's International University, Tokyo, Japan
- Department of Neuropsychiatry, Kyorin University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yukari Yaju
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics for Nursing, Graduate School of Nursing Science, St. Luke's International University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Tomohiro Utsumi
- Department of Sleep-Wake Disorders, National Institute of Mental Health, National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry, Tokyo, Japan
- Department of Psychiatry, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Leigh Sanyaolu
- Division of Population Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| | - Marianne Storm
- Department of Public Health, Faculty of Health Science, University of Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway
- Faculty of Health Sciences and Social Care, Molde University College, Molde, Norway
| | - Yoshikazu Takaesu
- Department of Neuropsychiatry, Kyorin University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
- Department of Neuropsychiatry, University of the Ryukyus, Okinawa, Japan
| | - Koichiro Watanabe
- Department of Neuropsychiatry, Kyorin University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Norio Watanabe
- Department of Psychiatry, Soseikai General Hospital, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Edward Duncan
- Nursing, Midwifery and Allied Health Professions Research Unit, The University of Stirling, Scotland, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Thomas EC, Ben-David S, Treichler E, Roth S, Dixon L, Salzer M, Zisman-Ilani Y. A Systematic Review of Shared Decision-Making Interventions for Service Users With Serious Mental Illnesses: State of the Science and Future Directions. Psychiatr Serv 2021; 72:1288-1300. [PMID: 34369801 PMCID: PMC8570969 DOI: 10.1176/appi.ps.202000429] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Shared decision making (SDM) is a health communication model that may be particularly appealing to service users with serious mental illnesses, who often want to be involved in making decisions about their mental health care. The purpose of this systematic review was to describe and evaluate participant, intervention, methodological, and outcome characteristics of SDM intervention studies conducted within this population. METHODS Systematic searches of the literature through April 2020 were conducted and supplemented by hand searching of reference lists of identified studies. A total of 53 independent studies of SDM interventions that were conducted with service users with serious mental illnesses and that included a quantitative or qualitative measure of the intervention were included in the review. Data were independently extracted by at least two authors. RESULTS Most studies were conducted with middle-age, male, White individuals from Western countries. Interventions fell into the following categories: decision support tools only, multicomponent interventions involving decision support tools, multicomponent interventions not involving decision support tools, and shared care planning and preference elicitation interventions. Most studies were randomized controlled trials with sufficient sample sizes. Outcomes assessed were diverse, spanning decision-making constructs, clinical and functional, treatment engagement or adherence, and other constructs. CONCLUSIONS Findings suggest important future directions for research, including the need to evaluate the impact of SDM in special populations (e.g., young adults and racial-ethnic minority groups); to expand interventions to a broader array of decisions, users, and contexts; and to establish consensus measures to assess intervention effectiveness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Emily Treichler
- VA Desert Pacific Mental Illness Research, Education, and Clinical Center (MIRECC), San Diego, CA
- Department of Psychiatry, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Crawford MJ, Thana L, Evans R, Carne A, O'Connell L, Claringbold A, Saravanamuthu A, Case R, Munjiza J, Jayacodi S, Reilly JG, Hughes E, Hoare Z, Barrett B, Leeson VC, Paton C, Keown P, Pappa S, Green C, Barnes TR. Switching antipsychotic medication to reduce sexual dysfunction in people with psychosis: the REMEDY RCT. Health Technol Assess 2021; 24:1-54. [PMID: 32930090 DOI: 10.3310/hta24440] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Sexual dysfunction is common among people who are prescribed antipsychotic medication for psychosis. Sexual dysfunction can impair quality of life and reduce treatment adherence. Switching antipsychotic medication may help, but the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of this approach is unclear. OBJECTIVE To examine whether or not switching antipsychotic medication provides a clinically effective and cost-effective method to reduce sexual dysfunction in people with psychosis. DESIGN A two-arm, researcher-blind, pilot randomised trial with a parallel qualitative study and an internal pilot phase. Study participants were randomised to enhanced standard care plus a switch of antipsychotic medication or enhanced standard care alone in a 1 : 1 ratio. Randomisation was via an independent and remote web-based service using dynamic adaptive allocation, stratified by age, gender, Trust and relationship status. SETTING NHS secondary care mental health services in England. PARTICIPANTS Potential participants had to be aged ≥ 18 years, have schizophrenia or related psychoses and experience sexual dysfunction associated with the use of antipsychotic medication. We recruited only people for whom reduction in medication dosage was ineffective or inappropriate. We excluded those who were acutely unwell, had had a change in antipsychotic medication in the last 6 weeks, were currently prescribed clozapine or whose sexual dysfunction was believed to be due to a coexisting physical or mental disorder. INTERVENTIONS Switching to an equivalent dose of one of three antipsychotic medications that are considered to have a relatively low propensity for sexual side effects (i.e. quetiapine, aripiprazole or olanzapine). All participants were offered brief psychoeducation and support to discuss their sexual health and functioning. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The primary outcome was patient-reported sexual dysfunction, measured using the Arizona Sexual Experience Scale. Secondary outcomes were researcher-rated sexual functioning, mental health, side effects of medication, health-related quality of life and service utilisation. Outcomes were assessed 3 and 6 months after randomisation. Qualitative data were collected from a purposive sample of patients and clinicians to explore barriers to recruitment. SAMPLE SIZE Allowing for a 20% loss to follow-up, we needed to recruit 216 participants to have 90% power to detect a 3-point difference in total Arizona Sexual Experience Scale score (standard deviation 6.0 points) using a 0.05 significance level. RESULTS The internal pilot was discontinued after 12 months because of low recruitment. Ninety-eight patients were referred to the study between 1 July 2018 and 30 June 2019, of whom 10 were randomised. Eight (80%) participants were followed up 3 months later. Barriers to referral and recruitment included staff apprehensions about discussing side effects, reluctance among patients to switch medication and reticence of both staff and patients to talk about sex. LIMITATIONS Insufficient numbers of participants were recruited to examine the study hypotheses. CONCLUSIONS It may not be possible to conduct a successful randomised trial of switching antipsychotic medication for sexual functioning in people with psychosis in the NHS at this time. FUTURE WORK Research examining the acceptability and effectiveness of adjuvant phosphodiesterase inhibitors should be considered. TRIAL REGISTRATION Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN12307891. FUNDING This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 24, No. 44. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Lavanya Thana
- Division of Psychiatry, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Rachel Evans
- North Wales Organisation for Randomised Trials in Health and Social Care, University of Bangor, Bangor, UK
| | - Alexandra Carne
- Tees, Esk and Wear Valleys NHS Foundation Trust, Darlington, UK
| | | | | | | | - Rebecca Case
- Central and North West London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Jasna Munjiza
- Division of Psychiatry, Imperial College London, London, UK.,Central and North West London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Sandra Jayacodi
- Central and North West London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Joseph G Reilly
- Tees, Esk and Wear Valleys NHS Foundation Trust, Darlington, UK
| | | | - Zoe Hoare
- North Wales Organisation for Randomised Trials in Health and Social Care, University of Bangor, Bangor, UK
| | - Barbara Barrett
- Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| | | | | | - Patrick Keown
- Cumbria, Northumberland, Tyne and Wear NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Sofia Pappa
- Division of Psychiatry, Imperial College London, London, UK.,West London NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Charlotte Green
- Central and North West London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Ariyo K, Henderson C, Gilbert S, Smith S. Advance directives reduce friction over involuntary treatment. Lancet Psychiatry 2021; 8:749. [PMID: 34419177 DOI: 10.1016/s2215-0366(21)00248-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2021] [Revised: 06/25/2021] [Accepted: 06/25/2021] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Kevin Ariyo
- Department of Psychological Medicine, London SE5 8AF, UK.
| | - Claire Henderson
- Department of Health Service and Population Research, London SE5 8AF, UK
| | | | - Shubulade Smith
- Department of Forensic and Neurodevelopmental Sciences, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London SE5 8AF, UK
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Bick D, Taylor C, Bhavnani V, Healey A, Seed P, Roberts S, Zasada M, Avery A, Craig V, Khazaezadah N, McMullen S, O’Connor S, Oki B, Oteng-Ntim E, Poston L, Ussher M. Lifestyle information and access to a commercial weight management group to promote maternal postnatal weight management and positive lifestyle behaviour: the SWAN feasibility RCT. PUBLIC HEALTH RESEARCH 2020. [DOI: 10.3310/phr08090] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Background
Increasing numbers of UK women have overweight or obese body mass index scores when they become pregnant, or gain excessive weight in pregnancy, increasing their risk of adverse outcomes. Failure to manage postnatal weight is linked to smoking, non-healthy dietary choices, lack of regular exercise and poorer longer-term health. Women living in areas of higher social deprivation are more likely to experience weight management problems postnatally.
Objectives
The objectives were to assess the feasibility of conducting a definitive randomised controlled trial to determine the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of lifestyle information and access to a commercial weight management group focusing on self-monitoring, goal-setting and motivation to achieve dietary change commencing 8–16 weeks postnatally to achieve and maintain weight management and positive lifestyle behaviour.
Design
The design was a randomised two-arm feasibility trial with a nested mixed-methods process evaluation.
Setting
The setting was a single centre in an inner city setting in the south of England.
Participants
Participants were women with body mass index scores of > 25 kg/m2 at antenatal ‘booking’ and women with normal body mass index scores (18.0–24.9 kg/m2) at antenatal booking who developed excessive gestational weight gain as assessed at 36 weeks’ gestation.
Main outcome measures
Recruitment, retention, acceptability of trial processes and identification of relevant economic data were the feasibility objectives. The proposed primary outcome was difference between groups in weight at 12 months postnatally, expressed as percentage weight change and weight loss from antenatal booking. Other proposed outcomes included assessment of diet, physical activity, smoking, alcohol consumption, body image, maternal esteem, mental health, infant feeding and NHS costs.
Results
Most objectives were achieved. A total of 193 women were recruited, 98 allocated to the intervention arm and 95 to the control arm. High follow-up rates (> 80%) were achieved to 12 months. There was an 8.8% difference in weight loss at 12 months between women allocated to the intervention arm and women allocated to the control arm (13.0% vs. 4.2%, respectively; p = 0.062); 47% of women in the intervention arm attended at least one weight management session, with low risk of contamination between arms. The greatest benefit was among women who attended ≥ 10 sessions. Barriers to attending sessions included capability, opportunity and motivation issues. Data collection tools were appropriate to support economic evaluation in a definitive trial, and economic modelling is feasible to quantify resource impacts and outcomes not directly measurable within a trial.
Limitations
The trial recruited from only one site. It was not possible to recruit women with normal body mass index scores who developed excessive pregnancy weight gain.
Conclusions
It was feasible to recruit and retain women with overweight or obese body mass index scores at antenatal booking to a trial comparing postnatal weight management plus standard care with standard care only and collect relevant data to assess outcomes. Approaches to recruit women with normal body mass index scores who gain excessive gestational weight need to be considered. Commercial weight management groups could support women’s weight management as assessed at 12 months postnatally, with probable greater benefit from attending ≥ 10 sessions. Process evaluation findings highlighted the importance of providing more information about the intervention on trial allocation, extended duration of time to commence sessions following birth and extended number of sessions offered to enhance uptake and retention. Results support the conduct of a future randomised controlled trial.
Trial registration
Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN39186148.
Funding
This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Public Health Research programme and will be published in full in Public Health Research; Vol. 8, No. 9. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Debra Bick
- Warwick Clinical Trials Unit, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
- Department of Women and Children’s Health, School of Life Course Sciences, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Cath Taylor
- School of Health Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK
| | | | - Andy Healey
- King’s Health Economics, Health Service and Population Research Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Paul Seed
- Department of Women and Children’s Health, School of Life Course Sciences, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Sarah Roberts
- King’s Health Economics, Health Service and Population Research Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King’s College London, London, UK
| | | | - Amanda Avery
- Faculty of Science, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | | | | | | | | | - Bimpe Oki
- Public Health, London Borough of Lambeth, London, UK
| | | | - Lucilla Poston
- Department of Women and Children’s Health, School of Life Course Sciences, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Michael Ussher
- Population Health Research Institute, St George’s, University of London, London, UK
- Institute for Social Marketing and Health, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Gooding P, McSherry B, Roper C. Preventing and reducing 'coercion' in mental health services: an international scoping review of English-language studies. Acta Psychiatr Scand 2020; 142:27-39. [PMID: 31953847 PMCID: PMC7496148 DOI: 10.1111/acps.13152] [Citation(s) in RCA: 50] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/12/2020] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
This article discusses initiatives aimed at preventing and reducing 'coercive practices' in mental health and community settings worldwide, including in hospitals in high-income countries, and in family homes and rural communities in low- and middle-income countries. The article provides a scoping review of the current state of English-language empirical research. It identifies several promising opportunities for improving responses that promote support based on individuals' rights, will and preferences. It also points out several gaps in research and practice (including, importantly, a gap in reviews of non-English-language studies). Overall, many studies suggest that efforts to prevent and reduce coercion appear to be effective. However, no jurisdiction appears to have combined the full suite of laws, policies and practices which are available, and which taken together might further the goal of eliminating coercion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P. Gooding
- University of MelbourneParkvilleVicAustralia
| | - B. McSherry
- University of MelbourneParkvilleVicAustralia
| | - C. Roper
- University of MelbourneParkvilleVicAustralia
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Poremski D, Alexander M, Fang T, Tan GMY, Ong S, Su A, Fung D, Chua HC. Psychiatric Advance Directives and their relevance to improving psychiatric care in Asian countries. Asia Pac Psychiatry 2020; 12:e12374. [PMID: 31872576 PMCID: PMC7027531 DOI: 10.1111/appy.12374] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2019] [Accepted: 11/07/2019] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
People with mental illness may be unable to provide critical input about the care they wish to receive during a psychiatric crisis because of altered mental states. It is therefore imperative that clinicians seek to understand service users' wishes for care while they are well and able to provide meaningful input into the discussion. Achieving such an end may be done by discussing and completing a psychiatric advance directive. However, very few Asian countries have legislation that supports such advance directives. The present article seeks to give physicians more information about advance psychiatric directives and the potential role they could play to improve the healthcare provided in Asia to people at risk of losing capacity due to a mental illness. The degree to which mental health legislation supports psychiatric advance directives is documented for each country of South East Asia and Eastern Asia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Poremski
- Health Intelligence Unit, Institute of Mental Health, Singapore
| | | | - Tina Fang
- Health Intelligence Unit, Institute of Mental Health, Singapore
| | - Giles Ming-Yee Tan
- Department of Developmental Psychiatry, Institute of Mental Health, Singapore
| | - Samantha Ong
- Nursing Department, Institute of Mental Health, Singapore
| | - Alex Su
- Medical Board, Institute of Mental Health, Singapore
| | - Daniel Fung
- Medical Board, Institute of Mental Health, Singapore
| | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Bick D, Taylor C, Bhavnani V, Healey A, Seed P, Roberts S, Zasada M, Avery A, Craig V, Khazaezadah N, McMullen S, O'Connor S, Oki B, Ntim EO, Poston L, Ussher M. Lifestyle information and commercial weight management groups to support maternal postnatal weight management and positive lifestyle behaviour: the SWAN feasibility randomised controlled trial. BJOG 2019; 127:636-645. [DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.16043] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/25/2019] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- D Bick
- Warwick Clinical Trials Unit Warwick Medical School University of Warwick Coventry UK
| | - C Taylor
- School of Health Sciences University of Surrey Guildford UK
| | | | - A Healey
- Kings Health Economics, Health Services and Population Research Department Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience King's College London London UK
| | - P Seed
- Department of Women and Children's Health King's College London London UK
| | - S Roberts
- Kings Health Economics, Health Services and Population Research Department Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience King's College London London UK
| | - M Zasada
- School of Health Sciences University of Surrey Guildford UK
| | - A Avery
- Faculty of Science University of Nottingham Nottingham UK
| | - V Craig
- Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust London UK
| | - N Khazaezadah
- Public Health London Borough of Lambeth Lambeth London UK
| | | | - S O'Connor
- Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust London UK
| | - B Oki
- Public Health London Borough of Lambeth Lambeth London UK
| | - EO Ntim
- Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust London UK
| | - L Poston
- Department of Women and Children's Health King's College London London UK
| | - M Ussher
- Population Health Research Institute St George's University of London London UK
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Jankovic J, Richards F, Berrisford G, Priebe S. Advance statements in adult mental healthcare: an update. BJPSYCH ADVANCES 2019. [DOI: 10.1192/bja.2019.62] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
SUMMARYIn this article we re-examine the conclusions of our article on advance statements in adult mental healthcare that was published in 2010 in the light of new literature published in the intervening decade. We explore the results of studies on the implementation and effectiveness of advance statements in adult mental health services, and then summarise recommendations for legislative changes from the Independent Review of the Mental Health Act 1983 that are relevant for England and Wales.
Collapse
|
17
|
Bick D, Taylor C, Avery A, Bhavnani V, Craig V, Healey A, Khazaezadeh N, McMullen S, Oki B, Oteng-Ntim E, O'Connor S, Poston L, Seed P, Roberts S, Ussher M. Protocol for a two-arm feasibility RCT to support postnatal maternal weight management and positive lifestyle behaviour in women from an ethnically diverse inner city population: the SWAN feasibility trial. Pilot Feasibility Stud 2019; 5:117. [PMID: 31666983 PMCID: PMC6813080 DOI: 10.1186/s40814-019-0497-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2019] [Accepted: 09/06/2019] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction A high BMI during and after pregnancy is linked to poor pregnancy outcomes and contributes to long-term maternal obesity, hypertension, and diabetes. Evidence of feasible, effective postnatal interventions is lacking. This randomised controlled trial will assess the feasibility of conducting a future definitive trial to determine effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of lifestyle information and access to Slimming World® (Alfreton, UK) groups for 12 weeks commencing from 8 to 16 weeks postnatally, in relation to supporting longer-term postnatal weight management in women in an ethnically diverse inner city population. Methods/analysis Women will be recruited from one maternity unit in London. To be eligible, women will be overweight (BMI 25–29.9 kg/m2) or obese (BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2) as identified at their first antenatal contact, or have a normal BMI (18.5–24.9 kg/m2) at booking but gain excessive gestational weight as assessed at 36 weeks gestation. Women will be aged 18 and over, can speak and read English, expecting a single baby, and will not have accessed weight management groups in this pregnancy. Women will be randomly allocated to standard care plus lifestyle information and access to Slimming World® (Alfreton, UK) groups or standard care only. A sample of 130 women is required. Feasibility trial objectives reflect those considered most important inform a decision about undertaking a definitive future trial. These include estimation of impact of lifestyle information and postnatal access to Slimming World® (Alfreton, UK) on maternal weight change between antenatal booking weight and weight at 12 months postbirth, recruitment rate and time to recruitment, retention rate, influence of lifestyle information and Slimming World® (Alfreton, UK) groups on weight management, diet, physical activity, breastfeeding, smoking cessation, alcohol intake, physical and mental health, infant health, and health-related quality of life 6 and 12 months postnatally. An embedded process evaluation will assess acceptability of study processes and procedures to women. Ethics/dissemination London–Camberwell St Giles Research Ethics Committee, reference: 16/LO/1422. Outcomes will be disseminated in peer-reviewed journals and presentations at national and international conferences. Trial registration Trial registration number: ISRCTN 39186148. Protocol version number: v7, 13 August 17. Trial sponsor: King’s College London.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Debra Bick
- 1Warwick Clinical Trials Unit, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Gibbet Hill, Coventry, CV4 7AL UK
| | - Cath Taylor
- 2School of Health Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK
| | - Amanda Avery
- 3School of Biosciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | | | | | - Andy Healey
- 6Health Service and Population Research, King's College London, London, UK
| | | | | | - Bimpe Oki
- 7Department of Public Health, Lambeth Council, Lambeth, London, UK
| | - Eugene Oteng-Ntim
- 8Department of Women and Children's Health, School of Life Course Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, UK
| | | | - Lucilla Poston
- 8Department of Women and Children's Health, School of Life Course Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Paul Seed
- 8Department of Women and Children's Health, School of Life Course Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Sarah Roberts
- 6Health Service and Population Research, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Michael Ussher
- 9Division of Population Health and Education, St George's University of London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Molyneaux E, Turner A, Candy B, Landau S, Johnson S, Lloyd-Evans B. Crisis-planning interventions for people with psychotic illness or bipolar disorder: systematic review and meta-analyses. BJPsych Open 2019; 5:e53. [PMID: 31530302 PMCID: PMC6582216 DOI: 10.1192/bjo.2019.28] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Mental health services lack a strong evidence base on the most effective interventions to reduce compulsory admissions. However, some research suggests a positive impact of crisis-planning interventions in which patients are involved in planning for their future care during a mental health crisis. AIMS This review aimed to synthesise randomised controlled trial (RCT) evidence on the effectiveness of crisis-planning interventions (for example advance statements and joint crisis plans) in reducing rates of compulsory hospital admissions for people with psychotic illness or bipolar disorder, compared with usual care (PROSPERO registration number: CRD42018084808). METHOD Six online databases were searched in October 2018. The primary outcome was compulsory psychiatric admissions and secondary outcomes included other psychiatric admissions, therapeutic alliance, perceived coercion and cost-effectiveness. Bias was assessed using the Cochrane collaboration tool. RESULTS The search identified 1428 studies and 5 RCTs were eligible. One study had high risk of bias because of incomplete primary outcome data. Random-effects meta-analysis showed a 25% reduction in compulsory admissions for those receiving crisis-planning interventions compared with usual care (risk ratio 0.75, 95% CI 0.61-0.93, P = 0.008; from five studies). There was no statistical evidence that the intervention reduced the risk of voluntary or combined voluntary and compulsory psychiatric admissions. Few studies assessed other secondary outcomes. CONCLUSIONS Our meta-analysis suggests that crisis-planning interventions substantially reduce the risk of compulsory admissions among individuals with psychotic illness or bipolar disorder. Despite common components, interventions varied in their content and intensity across the trials. The optimal models and implementation of these interventions require further investigation. DECLARATION OF INTEREST E.M., S.L., S.J. and B.L.-E. received funding from the National Institute for Health Research during the conduct of the study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emma Molyneaux
- Research Associate, NIHR Mental Health Policy Research Unit, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, UK
| | - Amelia Turner
- Trainee Clinical Psychologist, Camden and Islington NHS Foundation Trust & Royal Holloway, University of London, UK
| | - Bridget Candy
- Principal Research Associate, Division of Psychiatry, University College London, UK
| | - Sabine Landau
- Professor of Biostatistics, Biostatistics & Health Informatics, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, UK
| | - Sonia Johnson
- Professor of Social and Community Psychiatry, NIHR Mental Health Policy Research Unit, Division of Psychiatry, University College London, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Abstract
SummaryEconomic evaluation involves the comparative analysis of the costs and
consequences of alternative (different) treatment options. Economic
evaluations provide decision makers with information about the relative
value for money, or cost-effectiveness, of various treatment programmes. The
relative cost-effectiveness of new interventions is a key consideration in
health technology assessments by the UK's National Institute for Health and
Care Excellence, and economic evaluations alongside randomised controlled
trials are routinely requested by funders such as the National Institute for
Health Research. This article outlines some of the key concepts and issues
in the economic evaluation of mental healthcare.
Collapse
|
20
|
Henderson C, Farrelly S, Flach C, Borschmann R, Birchwood M, Thornicroft G, Waheed W, Szmukler G. Informed, advance refusals of treatment by people with severe mental illness in a randomised controlled trial of joint crisis plans: demand, content and correlates. BMC Psychiatry 2017; 17:376. [PMID: 29178895 PMCID: PMC5702102 DOI: 10.1186/s12888-017-1542-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2017] [Accepted: 11/13/2017] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In the UK, crisis planning for mental health care should acknowledge the right to make an informed advance treatment refusal under the Mental Capacity Act 2005. Our aims were to estimate the demand for such treatment refusals within a sample of service users who had had a recent hospital admission for psychosis or bipolar disorder, and to examine the relationship between refusals, and service user characteristics. METHODS To identify refusals we conducted content analysis of Joint Crisis Plans, which are plans formulated by service users and their clinical team with involvement from an external facilitator, and routine care plans in sub-samples from a multi-centre randomised controlled trial of Joint Crisis Plans (plus routine mental health care) versus routine care alone (CRIMSON) in England. Factors hypothesised to be associated with refusals were identified using the trial data collected through baseline interviews of service users and clinicians and collection of routine clinical data. RESULTS Ninety-nine of 221 (45%) of the Joint Crisis Plans contained a treatment refusal compared to 10 of 424 (2.4%) baseline routine care plans. No Joint Crisis Plans recorded disagreement with refusals on the part of clinicians. Among those with completed Joint Crisis Plans, adjusted analyses indicated a significant association between treatment refusals and perceived coercion at baseline (odds ratio = 1.21, 95% CI 1.02-1.43), but not with baseline working alliance or a past history of involuntary admission. CONCLUSIONS We demonstrated significant demand for written treatment refusals in line with the Mental Capacity Act 2005, which had not previously been elicited by the process of treatment planning. Future treatment/crisis plans should incorporate the opportunity for service users to record a treatment refusal during the drafting of such plans. TRIAL REGISTRATION ISRCTN11501328 Registered 13th March 2008.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claire Henderson
- Health Service and Population Research Department, David Goldberg Centre, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, De Crespigny Park, London, SE5 8AF, UK.
| | - Simone Farrelly
- 0000 0001 2322 6764grid.13097.3cHealth Service and Population Research Department, David Goldberg Centre, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King’s College London, De Crespigny Park, London, SE5 8AF UK
| | - Clare Flach
- 0000 0001 2322 6764grid.13097.3cMedical Statistics Unit, Health and Social Care Research, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Rohan Borschmann
- 0000 0001 2322 6764grid.13097.3cHealth Service and Population Research Department, David Goldberg Centre, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King’s College London, De Crespigny Park, London, SE5 8AF UK ,0000 0004 0614 0346grid.416107.5Centre for Adolescent Health, Murdoch Children’s Research Institute, Royal Children’s Hospital, Melbourne, Australia ,0000 0001 2179 088Xgrid.1008.9Centre for Mental Health, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia ,0000 0001 2179 088Xgrid.1008.9Department of Psychiatry, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Max Birchwood
- 0000 0004 1936 7486grid.6572.6School of Psychology, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Graham Thornicroft
- 0000 0001 2322 6764grid.13097.3cHealth Service and Population Research Department, David Goldberg Centre, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King’s College London, De Crespigny Park, London, SE5 8AF UK
| | - Waquas Waheed
- 0000000121662407grid.5379.8Division of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - George Szmukler
- 0000 0001 2322 6764grid.13097.3cHealth Service and Population Research Department, David Goldberg Centre, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King’s College London, De Crespigny Park, London, SE5 8AF UK
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
CONCEPTUALIZATIONS OF THE SOCIETAL PERSPECTIVE WITHIN ECONOMIC EVALUATIONS: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2017. [PMID: 28641592 DOI: 10.1017/s0266462317000526] [Citation(s) in RCA: 49] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to investigate how the societal perspective is conceptualized in economic evaluations and to assess how intersectoral costs and benefits (ICBs), that is, the costs and benefits pertaining to sectors outside the healthcare sector, impact their results. METHODS Based on a search in July 2015 using PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, and PsychINFO, a systematic literature review was performed for economic evaluations which were conducted from a societal perspective. Conceptualizations were assessed in NVivo version 11 using conventional and directed content analysis. Trial-based evaluations in the fields of musculoskeletal and mental disorders were analyzed further, focusing on the way ICBs impact the results of economic evaluations. RESULTS A total of 107 studies were assessed, of which 74 (69.1 percent) provided conceptualizations of the societal perspective. These varied in types of costs included and in descriptions of cost bearers. Labor productivity costs were included in seventy-two studies (67.3 percent), while only thirty-eight studies (35.5 percent) included other ICBs, most of which entailed informal care and/or social care costs. ICBs within the educational and criminal justice sectors were each included five times. Most of the trial-based evaluations analyzed further (n = 21 of 28) reported productivity costs. In nine, these took up more than 50 percent of total costs. In several studies, criminal justice and informal care costs were also important. CONCLUSIONS There is great variety in the way the societal perspective is conceptualized and interpreted within economic evaluations. Use of the term "societal perspective" is often related to including merely productivity costs, while other ICBs could be relevant as well.
Collapse
|
22
|
Välimäki M, Yang M, Normand SL, Lorig KR, Anttila M, Lantta T, Pekurinen V, Adams CE. Study protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial to assess the effectiveness of user-driven intervention to prevent aggressive events in psychiatric services. BMC Psychiatry 2017; 17:123. [PMID: 28372555 PMCID: PMC5379524 DOI: 10.1186/s12888-017-1266-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2017] [Accepted: 03/11/2017] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND People admitted to psychiatric hospitals with a diagnosis of schizophrenia may display behavioural problems. These may require management approaches such as use of coercive practices, which impact the well-being of staff members, visiting families and friends, peers, as well as patients themselves. Studies have proposed that not only patients' conditions, but also treatment environment and ward culture may affect patients' behaviour. Seclusion and restraint could possibly be prevented with staff education about user-centred, more humane approaches. Staff education could also increase collaboration between patients, family members and staff, which may further positively affect treatment culture and lower the need for using coercive treatment methods. METHODS This is a single-blind, two-arm cluster randomised controlled trial involving 28 psychiatric hospital wards across Finland. Units will be randomised to receive either a staff educational programme delivered by the team of researchers, or standard care. The primary outcome is the incidence of use of patient seclusion rooms, assessed from the local/national health registers. Secondary outcomes include use of other coercive methods (limb restraint, forced injection, and physical restraint), service use, treatment satisfaction, general functioning among patients, and team climate and employee turn-over (nursing staff). DISCUSSION The study, designed in close collaboration with staff members, patients and their relatives, will provide evidence for a co-operative and user-centred educational intervention aiming to decrease the prevalence of coercive methods and service use in the units, increase the functional status of patients and improve team climate in the units. We have identified no similar trials. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02724748 . Registered on 25th of April 2016.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maritta Välimäki
- Department of Nursing Science, Faculty of Medicine, University of Turku , Turku, Finland
- School of Nursing, Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, China
- Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland
| | - Min Yang
- West China Research Center for Rural Health Development, Sichuan University Huaxi Medical Center, Sichuan University of China, Administration Building, No 17,Section 3,Ren Ming Nan Lu, Chengdu, Sichuan China
- Department of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, 180 Longwood Avenue, Boston, MA 02115-5899 USA
| | - Sharon-Lise Normand
- Department of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, 180 Longwood Avenue, Boston, MA 02115-5899 USA
- Department of Biostatistics, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Harvard Medical School, 180 Longwood Avenue, Boston, MA 02115-5899 USA
| | - Kate R. Lorig
- Department of Medicine - Med/Immunology & Rheumatology, Stanford University, 1000 WELCH RD. #204, Stanford, CA 94305-5755 USA
| | - Minna Anttila
- Department of Nursing Science, Faculty of Medicine, University of Turku , Turku, Finland
| | - Tella Lantta
- Department of Nursing Science, Faculty of Medicine, University of Turku , Turku, Finland
| | - Virve Pekurinen
- Department of Nursing Science, Faculty of Medicine, University of Turku , Turku, Finland
| | - Clive E. Adams
- Institute of Mental Health, Division of Psychiatry, University of Nottingham, Jubilee Campus, Wollaton Road, Nottingham, NG8 1BB UK
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Paton F, Wright K, Ayre N, Dare C, Johnson S, Lloyd-Evans B, Simpson A, Webber M, Meader N. Improving outcomes for people in mental health crisis: a rapid synthesis of the evidence for available models of care. Health Technol Assess 2016; 20:1-162. [PMID: 26771169 DOI: 10.3310/hta20030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 53] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Crisis Concordat was established to improve outcomes for people experiencing a mental health crisis. The Crisis Concordat sets out four stages of the crisis care pathway: (1) access to support before crisis point; (2) urgent and emergency access to crisis care; (3) quality treatment and care in crisis; and (4) promoting recovery. OBJECTIVES To evaluate the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the models of care for improving outcomes at each stage of the care pathway. DATA SOURCES Electronic databases were searched for guidelines, reviews and, where necessary, primary studies. The searches were performed on 25 and 26 June 2014 for NHS Evidence, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects, NHS Economic Evaluation Database, and the Health Technology Assessment (HTA) and PROSPERO databases, and on 11 November 2014 for MEDLINE, PsycINFO and the Criminal Justice Abstracts databases. Relevant reports and reference lists of retrieved articles were scanned to identify additional studies. STUDY SELECTION When guidelines covered a topic comprehensively, further literature was not assessed; however, where there were gaps, systematic reviews and then primary studies were assessed in order of priority. STUDY APPRAISAL AND SYNTHESIS METHODS Systematic reviews were critically appraised using the Risk Of Bias In Systematic reviews assessment tool, trials were assessed using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool, studies without a control group were assessed using the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) prognostic studies tool and qualitative studies were assessed using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme quality assessment tool. A narrative synthesis was conducted for each stage of the care pathway structured according to the type of care model assessed. The type and range of evidence identified precluded the use of meta-analysis. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS One review of reviews, six systematic reviews, nine guidelines and 15 primary studies were included. There was very limited evidence for access to support before crisis point. There was evidence of benefits for liaison psychiatry teams in improving service-related outcomes in emergency departments, but this was often limited by potential confounding in most studies. There was limited evidence regarding models to improve urgent and emergency access to crisis care to guide police officers in their Mental Health Act responsibilities. There was positive evidence on clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of crisis resolution teams but variability in implementation. Current work from the Crisis resolution team Optimisation and RElapse prevention study aims to improve fidelity in delivering these models. Crisis houses and acute day hospital care are also currently recommended by NICE. There was a large evidence base on promoting recovery with a range of interventions recommended by NICE likely to be important in helping people stay well. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS Most evidence was rated as low or very low quality, but this partly reflects the difficulty of conducting research into complex interventions for people in a mental health crisis and does not imply that all research was poorly conducted. However, there are currently important gaps in research for a number of stages of the crisis care pathway. Particular gaps in research on access to support before crisis point and urgent and emergency access to crisis care were found. In addition, more high-quality research is needed on the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of mental health crisis care, including effective components of inpatient care, post-discharge transitional care and Community Mental Health Teams/intensive case management teams. STUDY REGISTRATION This study is registered as PROSPERO CRD42014013279. FUNDING The National Institute for Health Research HTA programme.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fiona Paton
- Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York, York, UK
| | - Kath Wright
- Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York, York, UK
| | | | - Ceri Dare
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | - Sonia Johnson
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK
| | | | - Alan Simpson
- School of Health Sciences, City University London, London, UK
| | - Martin Webber
- Department of Social Policy and Social Work, University of York, York, UK
| | - Nick Meader
- Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York, York, UK
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Molina-López A, Cruz-Islas JB, Palma-Cortés M, Guizar-Sánchez DP, Garfias-Rau CY, Ontiveros-Uribe MP, Fresán-Orellana A. Validity and reliability of a novel Color-Risk Psychiatric Triage in a psychiatric emergency department. BMC Psychiatry 2016; 16:30. [PMID: 26860593 PMCID: PMC4748451 DOI: 10.1186/s12888-016-0727-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2015] [Accepted: 01/28/2016] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Classification of Psychiatric Emergency Presentations (PEP) is not sufficiently clear due to their inherent high inter-subjectivity and lack of validated triage instruments. In order to improve current classification of psychiatric emergency presentations (PEP) at Emergency Departments, we implemented and validated the Color-Risk Psychiatric Triage (CRPT), an instrument for classifying PEP risk by sorting one to five color/risk levels and one to thirty-two possible conditions arranged by risk. METHODS Users who visited the Emergency Department (ED) of a Mexican psychiatric hospital from Dec 1st, 2008 to Dec 1st, 2009 were included. One CRPT was assessed by an ED psychiatrist to each patient upon their arrival to ED. Some patients were randomly assessed simultaneously with an additional CRPT and a Crisis and Triage Rating Scale (CTRS) to test validity and reliability of the CRPT. RESULTS A total of 7,631 CRPT assessments were included. The majority of PEP were non-urgent (74.28 %). For the validation phase n = 158 patients were included. CRPT score showed higher concurrent validity than CRPT color/risk. CRPT level/risk and score showed highest concurrent validity within dangerousness domain of CTRS (r = 0.703, p < 0.0001). CRPT and CTRS scores showed similar predictive validity (p < 0.0001). High intraclass correlation coefficient (0.982) and Cohen's Kappa (0.89) were observed for CRPT score (r = 0.982, p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS CRPT appeared to be a useful instrument for PEP classification due to its concurrent validity, predictive validity and reliability. CRPT score showed higher correlations than the CRPT color/risk. The five levels of risk provided by the CRPT appear to represent a simple and specific method for classifying PEP. This approach considers actual or potential risk, rather than severity, as the main factor for sorting PEP, which improves upon the current approach to emergency classification that is mainly based on the criterion of severity. Regardless of the triage procedure, emergency assessments should no longer classify PEP as "not real emergencies."
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alejandro Molina-López
- Continuous Psychiatric Care Department, Clinical Services Direction, Ramon de la Fuente National Institute of Psychiatry, Calz. México-Xochimilco 101, Mexico City, 14370, Mexico.
| | | | - Mauricio Palma-Cortés
- Education Direction, Ramon de la Fuente National Institute of Psychiatry, Mexico City, Mexico.
| | | | - César Yehú Garfias-Rau
- Education Direction, Ramon de la Fuente National Institute of Psychiatry, Mexico City, Mexico.
| | | | - Ana Fresán-Orellana
- Clinical Epidemiology Laboratory, Clinical Research Direction, Ramon de la Fuente National Institute of Psychiatry, Mexico City, Mexico.
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Henderson C, Farrelly S, Moran P, Borschmann R, Thornicroft G, Birchwood M, Crimson T, Joshua. Joint crisis planning in mental health care: the challenge of implementation in randomized trials and in routine care. World Psychiatry 2015; 14:281-3. [PMID: 26407774 PMCID: PMC4592641 DOI: 10.1002/wps.20256] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Claire Henderson
- Health Service and Population Research Department, King’s College London, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and NeuroscienceLondon, UK
| | - Simone Farrelly
- Health Service and Population Research Department, King’s College London, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and NeuroscienceLondon, UK
| | - Paul Moran
- Health Service and Population Research Department, King’s College London, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and NeuroscienceLondon, UK
| | - Rohan Borschmann
- Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of MelbourneMelbourne, Australia
| | - Graham Thornicroft
- Health Service and Population Research Department, King’s College London, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and NeuroscienceLondon, UK
| | - Max Birchwood
- Division of Mental Health and Wellbeing, University of WarwickWarwick, UK
| | - The Crimson
- Health Service and Population Research Department, King’s College London, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and NeuroscienceLondon, UK,Division of Mental Health and Wellbeing, University of WarwickWarwick, UK,Community Based Medicine, University of ManchesterManchester, UK
| | - Joshua
- Health Service and Population Research Department, King’s College London, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and NeuroscienceLondon, UK,Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of MelbourneMelbourne, Australia
| | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
Abstract
AIMS To explore the role of psychiatric admission, diagnosis and reported unfair treatment in the relationship between ethnicity and mistrust of mental health services. METHODS The Mental Illness-Related Investigations on Discrimination (MIRIAD) study was a cross-sectional study of 202 individuals using secondary mental health services in South London. Two structural equation models were estimated, one using Admission (whether admitted to hospital for psychiatric treatment in the past 5 years) and one using involuntary admission to hospital in the past 5 years. RESULTS Increased mistrust was directly associated with the latent variable 'unfair treatment by mental health services and staff' and with Black or mixed ethnicity in both models. Those with a diagnosis of schizophrenia spectrum (as compared to depression and bipolar disorder) had a lower average score on the latent variable, suggesting that on average they reported less unfair treatment. We found evidence of increased reporting of unfair treatment by those who had an admission in the past 5 years, had experienced involuntary admission, and for people of Black of mixed Black and White ethnicity. CONCLUSIONS Neither prevalence of schizophrenia spectrum nor rates of hospital admission explained the greater mistrust of mental health services found among people of Black and mixed Black and White ethnicity compared with White ethnicity. Rather, people of Black and mixed Black and white ethnicity may be more likely to experience unfair treatment, generating mistrust; furthermore, this group is more likely to express mistrust even after accounting for reporting of unfair treatment by mental health services and staff.
Collapse
|
27
|
Preventing compulsory admission to psychiatric inpatient care using psycho-education and monitoring: feasibility and outcomes after 12 months. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 2015; 265:209-17. [PMID: 25361537 DOI: 10.1007/s00406-014-0553-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/04/2014] [Accepted: 10/11/2014] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Abstract
The aim of this study was to evaluate an intervention programme for people with severe mental illness that targets the reduction in compulsory psychiatric admissions. In the current study, we examine the feasibility of retaining patients in this programme and compare outcomes over the first 12 months to those after treatment as usual (TAU). Study participants were recruited in four psychiatric hospitals in the Canton of Zurich, Switzerland. Patients were eligible if they had at least one compulsory admission during the past 24 months. Participants were assigned at random to the intervention or to the TAU group. The intervention programme consists of individualised psycho-education focusing on behaviours prior to illness-related crisis, crisis cards and, after discharge from the psychiatric hospital, a 24-month preventive monitoring. In total, 238 (of 756 approached) inpatients were included in the trial. After 12 months, 80 (67.2%) in the intervention group and 102 (85.7%) in the TAU group were still participating in the trial. Of these, 22.5% in the intervention group (35.3% TAU) had been compulsorily readmitted to psychiatry; results suggest a significantly lower number of compulsory readmissions per patient (0.3 intervention; 0.7 TAU). Dropouts are characterised by younger age and unemployment. This interim analysis suggests beneficial effects of this intervention for targeted psychiatric patients.
Collapse
|
28
|
Weich S, McBride O, Twigg L, Keown P, Cyhlarova E, Crepaz-Keay D, Parsons H, Scott J, Bhui K. Variation in compulsory psychiatric inpatient admission in England: a cross-sectional, multilevel analysis. HEALTH SERVICES AND DELIVERY RESEARCH 2014. [DOI: 10.3310/hsdr02490] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
BackgroundRates of compulsory admission have increased in England in recent decades, and this trend is accelerating. Studying variation in rates between people and places can help identify modifiable causes.ObjectivesTo quantify and model variances in the rate of compulsory admission in England at different spatial levels and to assess the extent to which this was explained by characteristics of people and places.DesignCross-sectional analysis using multilevel statistical modelling.SettingEngland, including 98% of Census lower layer super output areas (LSOAs), 95% of primary care trusts (PCTs), 93% of general practices and all 69 NHS providers of specialist mental health services.Participants1,287,730 patients.Main outcome measureThe study outcome was compulsory admission, defined as time spent in an inpatient mental illness bed subject to the Mental Health Act (2007) in 2010/11. We excluded patients detained under sections applying to emergency assessment only (including those in places of safety), guardianship or supervision of community treatment. The control group comprised all other users of specialist mental health services during the same period.Data sourcesThe Mental Health Minimum Data Set (MHMDS). Data on explanatory variables, characterising each of the spatial levels in the data set, were obtained from a wide range of sources, and were linked using MHMDS identifiers.ResultsA total of 3.5% of patients had at least one compulsory admission in 2010/11. Of (unexplained) variance in the null model, 84.5% occurred between individuals. Statistically significant variance occurred between LSOAs [6.7%, 95% confidence interval (CI) 6.2% to 7.2%] and provider trusts (6.9%, 95% CI 4.3% to 9.5%). Variances at these higher levels remained statistically significant even after adjusting for a large number of explanatory variables, which together explained only 10.2% of variance in the study outcome. The number of provider trusts whose observed rate of compulsory admission differed from the model average to a statistically significant extent fell from 45 in the null model to 20 in the fully adjusted model. We found statistically significant associations between compulsory admission and age, gender, ethnicity, local area deprivation and ethnic density. There was a small but statistically significant association between (higher) bed occupancy and compulsory admission, but this was subsequently confounded by other covariates. Adjusting for PCT investment in mental health services did not improve model fit in the fully adjusted models.ConclusionsThis was the largest study of compulsory admissions in England. While 85% of the variance in this outcome occurred between individuals, statistically significant variance (around 7% each) occurred between places (LSOAs) and provider trusts. This higher-level variance in compulsory admission remained largely unchanged even after adjusting for a large number of explanatory variables. We were constrained by data available to us, and therefore our results must be interpreted with caution. We were also unable to consider many hypotheses suggested by the service users, carers and professionals who we consulted. There is an imperative to develop and evaluate interventions to reduce compulsory admission rates. This requires further research to extend our understanding of the reasons why these rates remain so high.FundingThe National Institute for Health Research Health Services and Delivery Research programme.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Scott Weich
- Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
| | - Orla McBride
- School of Psychology, University of Ulster, Londonderry, UK
| | - Liz Twigg
- Department of Geography, University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth, UK
| | - Patrick Keown
- Academic Psychiatry, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | | | | | - Helen Parsons
- Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
| | - Jan Scott
- Academic Psychiatry, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Kamaldeep Bhui
- Centre for Psychiatry, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|