1
|
Seibel RL, Meadows AJ, Mundt C, Tildesley M. Modeling target-density-based cull strategies to contain foot-and-mouth disease outbreaks. PeerJ 2024; 12:e16998. [PMID: 38436010 PMCID: PMC10909358 DOI: 10.7717/peerj.16998] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2023] [Accepted: 02/02/2024] [Indexed: 03/05/2024] Open
Abstract
Total ring depopulation is sometimes used as a management strategy for emerging infectious diseases in livestock, which raises ethical concerns regarding the potential slaughter of large numbers of healthy animals. We evaluated a farm-density-based ring culling strategy to control foot-and-mouth disease (FMD) in the United Kingdom (UK), which may allow for some farms within rings around infected premises (IPs) to escape depopulation. We simulated this reduced farm density, or "target density", strategy using a spatially-explicit, stochastic, state-transition algorithm. We modeled FMD spread in four counties in the UK that have different farm demographics, using 740,000 simulations in a full-factorial analysis of epidemic impact measures (i.e., culled animals, culled farms, and epidemic length) and cull strategy parameters (i.e., target farm density, daily farm cull capacity, and cull radius). All of the cull strategy parameters listed above were drivers of epidemic impact. Our simulated target density strategy was usually more effective at combatting FMD compared with traditional total ring depopulation when considering mean culled animals and culled farms and was especially effective when daily farm cull capacity was low. The differences in epidemic impact measures among the counties are likely driven by farm demography, especially differences in cattle and farm density. To prevent over-culling and the associated economic, organizational, ethical, and psychological impacts, the target density strategy may be worth considering in decision-making processes for future control of FMD and other diseases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachel L. Seibel
- Mathematics Institute, University of Warwick, Coventry, West Midlands, United Kingdom
- Department of Botany and Plant Pathology, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, United States
| | - Amanda J. Meadows
- Department of Botany and Plant Pathology, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, United States
- Ginkgo Bioworks, San Bruno, California, United States
| | - Christopher Mundt
- Department of Botany and Plant Pathology, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, United States
| | - Michael Tildesley
- Mathematics Institute, University of Warwick, Coventry, West Midlands, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Chaulagain B, Contina JB, Mills K, Seibel RL, Mundt CC. Comparing the efficacy of control strategies for infectious disease outbreaks using field and simulation studies. ECOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS : A PUBLICATION OF THE ECOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA 2022; 32:e2631. [PMID: 35403765 DOI: 10.1002/eap.2631] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2021] [Revised: 02/03/2022] [Accepted: 02/09/2022] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
Diseases characterized by long distance inoculum dispersal (LDD) are among the fastest spreading epidemics in both natural and managed landscapes. Management of such epidemics is extremely challenging because of asymptomatic infection extending at large spatial scales and frequent escape from the newly established disease sources. We compared the efficacy of area- and timing-based disease management strategies in artificially initiated field epidemics of wheat stripe rust and complemented with simulations from an updated version of the spatially explicit model EPIMUL, using model parameters relevant to field epidemics. The model was further used to expand the number of epidemic mitigations beyond that feasible to incorporate in the field. The field experiment was conducted for 2 years in two locations having different climatic conditions. Culling and protection treatments were applied at different times after epidemic initiation and to different spatial extents surrounding the outbreaks. In each experiment, treatments were replicated four times in plots 33.5 m long and 1.52 m wide with a 0.76 × 0.76 m inoculated focus centered within each plot. Disease gradients were assessed along the center lines of the plots at 1.52 m intervals both upwind and downwind from the focus. Both field and simulation results indicated that control measures applied over the entire population were highly effective in suppressing the epidemics by more than 99% but may not always be logistically and economically feasible at large spatial scales. Comparison between the variable sized treatment areas and application timings suggested that implementing contiguous premises (CP) cull at 1 day after first sporulation in the outbreak focus reduced rust by 52% and 60% in Corvallis and Madras, respectively. However, altering the cull size did not significantly affect the disease epidemic development, which suggested that early timing had a greater influence in suppressing the epidemics than did increased area of application. However, sufficiently large, treated areas may compensate for a delay in application timing to some extent. Results from these replicated treatments may help to devise appropriate management strategies for other LDD pathogens.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bhim Chaulagain
- College of Agricultural Sciences, Department of Botany and Plant Pathology, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon, USA
| | - Jean Bertrand Contina
- College of Agricultural Sciences, Department of Botany and Plant Pathology, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon, USA
| | - Karasi Mills
- College of Agricultural Sciences, Department of Botany and Plant Pathology, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon, USA
| | - Rachel L Seibel
- College of Agricultural Sciences, Department of Botany and Plant Pathology, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon, USA
| | - Christopher C Mundt
- College of Agricultural Sciences, Department of Botany and Plant Pathology, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Anthony R, De Paula Vieira A. One Health Animal Disaster Management: An Ethics of Care Approach. J APPL ANIM WELF SCI 2022; 25:180-194. [PMID: 35272545 DOI: 10.1080/10888705.2022.2040360] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
In this article, we consider the One Health framework for orienting guidance for animal disaster management through an ethics of care approach. While One Health was created at the beginning of the 21st century in response to the persistence of emerging infectious diseases and the view that the health of humans and other animals are contiguous, it can be a useful tool for promoting animal welfare and considering animals' experiences during a disaster. However, implementing One Health strategies into animal disaster management is not without its challenges, since ethical judgments are implicit in all decisions and recommendations made about how to conceptualize a "disaster" and their impact on animals and their welfare. Our discussion is divided into three sections. First, we consider the significance of a One Health framework for animal disaster management. Here, we highlight how One Health strategies can be employed in disaster health and natural disaster. Next, we use an ethics of care approach to lay the contours for an interspecies account of relational solidarity, thus offering a vision for how One Health strategies can reimagine the ethical dilemmas involving human-animal conflicts during a disaster. Lastly, we consider the textured nature of our relationship with animals, the moral weight of common vulnerability and interdependency and illuminating insights from animal welfare science.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Raymond Anthony
- Department of Philosophy, University of Alaska Anchorage, Anchorage, AK, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Outbreak investigation and identification of risk factors associated with the occurrence of foot and mouth disease in Punjab, Pakistan. Prev Vet Med 2022; 202:105613. [DOI: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2022.105613] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/05/2021] [Revised: 03/13/2022] [Accepted: 03/15/2022] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
|
5
|
Capon TR, Garner MG, Tapsuwan S, Roche S, Breed AC, Liu S, Miller C, Bradhurst R, Hamilton S. A Simulation Study of the Use of Vaccination to Control Foot-and-Mouth Disease Outbreaks Across Australia. Front Vet Sci 2021; 8:648003. [PMID: 34458348 PMCID: PMC8385296 DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2021.648003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/31/2020] [Accepted: 07/07/2021] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
This study examines the potential for foot-and-mouth disease (FMD) control strategies that incorporate vaccination to manage FMD spread for a range of incursion scenarios across Australia. Stakeholder consultation was used to formulate control strategies and incursion scenarios to ensure relevance to the diverse range of Australian livestock production regions and management systems. The Australian Animal Disease Spread model (AADIS) was used to compare nine control strategies for 13 incursion scenarios, including seven control strategies incorporating vaccination. The control strategies with vaccination differed in terms of their approaches for targeting areas and species. These strategies are compared with two benchmark strategies based on stamping out only. Outbreak size and duration were compared in terms of the total number of infected premises, the duration of the control stage of an FMD outbreak, and the number of vaccinated animals. The three key findings from this analysis are as follows: (1) smaller outbreaks can be effectively managed by stamping out without vaccination, (2) the size and duration of larger outbreaks can be significantly reduced when vaccination is used, and (3) different vaccination strategies produced similar reductions in the size and duration of an outbreak, but the number of animals vaccinated varied. Under current international standards for regaining FMD-free status, vaccinated animals need to be removed from the population at the end of the outbreak to minimize trade impacts. We have shown that selective, targeted vaccination strategies could achieve effective FMD control while significantly reducing the number of animals vaccinated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Sharon Roche
- Epidemiology and One Health Section, Department of Agriculture, Water and the Environment, Canberra, ACT, Australia
| | - Andrew C Breed
- Epidemiology and One Health Section, Department of Agriculture, Water and the Environment, Canberra, ACT, Australia.,School of Veterinary Science, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Shuang Liu
- CSIRO Land & Water, Acton, ACT, Australia
| | - Corissa Miller
- Epidemiology and One Health Section, Department of Agriculture, Water and the Environment, Canberra, ACT, Australia
| | - Richard Bradhurst
- Centre of Excellence for Biosecurity Risk Analysis, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Sam Hamilton
- Epidemiology and One Health Section, Department of Agriculture, Water and the Environment, Canberra, ACT, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Patyk KA, McCool-Eye MJ, South DD, Burdett CL, Maroney SA, Fox A, Kuiper G, Magzamen S. Modelling the domestic poultry population in the United States: A novel approach leveraging remote sensing and synthetic data methods. GEOSPATIAL HEALTH 2020; 15. [PMID: 33461269 DOI: 10.4081/gh.2020.913] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2020] [Accepted: 08/27/2020] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
Comprehensive and spatially accurate poultry population demographic data do not currently exist in the United States; however, these data are critically needed to adequately prepare for, and efficiently respond to and manage disease outbreaks. In response to absence of these data, this study developed a national-level poultry population dataset by using a novel combination of remote sensing and probabilistic modelling methodologies. The Farm Location and Agricultural Production Simulator (FLAPS) (Burdett et al., 2015) was used to provide baseline national-scale data depicting the simulated locations and populations of individual poultry operations. Remote sensing methods (identification using aerial imagery) were used to identify actual locations of buildings having the characteristic size and shape of commercial poultry barns. This approach was applied to 594 U.S. counties with > 100,000 birds in 34 states based on the 2012 U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS), Census of Agriculture (CoA). The two methods were integrated in a hybrid approach to develop an automated machine learning process to locate commercial poultry operations and predict the number and type of poultry for each operation across the coterminous United States. Validation illustrated that the hybrid model had higher locational accuracy and more realistic distribution and density patterns when compared to purely simulated data. The resulting national poultry population dataset has significant potential for application in animal disease spread modelling, surveillance, emergency planning and response, economics, and other fields, providing a versatile asset for further agricultural research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kelly A Patyk
- United States Department of Agriculture, Animal Plant and Health Inspection Service, Veterinary Services, Strategy and Policy, Center for Epidemiology and Animal Health.
| | - Mary J McCool-Eye
- United States Department of Agriculture, Animal Plant and Health Inspection Service, Veterinary Services, Strategy and Policy, Center for Epidemiology and Animal Health.
| | - David D South
- United States Department of Agriculture, Animal Plant and Health Inspection Service, Veterinary Services, Strategy and Policy, Center for Epidemiology and Animal Health.
| | - Christopher L Burdett
- Colorado State University, Department of Environmental and Radiological Health Sciences, Fort Collins, CO.
| | - Susan A Maroney
- Colorado State University, Department of Environmental and Radiological Health Sciences, Fort Collins, CO.
| | - Andrew Fox
- United States Department of Agriculture, Animal Plant and Health Inspection Service, Veterinary Services, Strategy and Policy, Center for Epidemiology and Animal Health.
| | - Grace Kuiper
- Colorado State University, Department of Environmental and Radiological Health Sciences, Fort Collins, CO.
| | - Sheryl Magzamen
- Colorado State University, Department of Environmental and Radiological Health Sciences, Fort Collins, CO.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Zaheer MU, Salman MD, Steneroden KK, Magzamen SL, Weber SE, Case S, Rao S. Challenges to the Application of Spatially Explicit Stochastic Simulation Models for Foot-and-Mouth Disease Control in Endemic Settings: A Systematic Review. COMPUTATIONAL AND MATHEMATICAL METHODS IN MEDICINE 2020; 2020:7841941. [PMID: 33294003 PMCID: PMC7700052 DOI: 10.1155/2020/7841941] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2020] [Revised: 10/20/2020] [Accepted: 10/30/2020] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Simulation modeling has become common for estimating the spread of highly contagious animal diseases. Several models have been developed to mimic the spread of foot-and-mouth disease (FMD) in specific regions or countries, conduct risk assessment, analyze outbreaks using historical data or hypothetical scenarios, assist in policy decisions during epidemics, formulate preparedness plans, and evaluate economic impacts. Majority of the available FMD simulation models were designed for and applied in disease-free countries, while there has been limited use of such models in FMD endemic countries. This paper's objective was to report the findings from a study conducted to review the existing published original research literature on spatially explicit stochastic simulation (SESS) models of FMD spread, focusing on assessing these models for their potential use in endemic settings. The goal was to identify the specific components of endemic FMD needed to adapt these SESS models for their potential application in FMD endemic settings. This systematic review followed the PRISMA guidelines, and three databases were searched, which resulted in 1176 citations. Eighty citations finally met the inclusion criteria and were included in the qualitative synthesis, identifying nine unique SESS models. These SESS models were assessed for their potential application in endemic settings. The assessed SESS models can be adapted for use in FMD endemic countries by modifying the underlying code to include multiple cocirculating serotypes, routine prophylactic vaccination (RPV), and livestock population dynamics to more realistically mimic the endemic characteristics of FMD. The application of SESS models in endemic settings will help evaluate strategies for FMD control, which will improve livestock health, provide economic gains for producers, help alleviate poverty and hunger, and will complement efforts to achieve the Sustainable Development Goals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Muhammad Usman Zaheer
- Animal Population Health Institute, Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins CO 80523, USA
- FMD Project Office, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, ASI Premises, NARC Gate # 2, Park Road, Islamabad 44000, Pakistan
| | - Mo D. Salman
- Animal Population Health Institute, Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins CO 80523, USA
| | - Kay K. Steneroden
- Animal Population Health Institute, Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins CO 80523, USA
| | - Sheryl L. Magzamen
- Department of Environmental and Radiological Health Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins CO 80523, USA
| | - Stephen E. Weber
- Animal Population Health Institute, Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins CO 80523, USA
| | - Shaun Case
- Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Walter Scott, Jr. College of Engineering, Colorado State University, Fort Collins CO 80521, USA
| | - Sangeeta Rao
- Animal Population Health Institute, Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins CO 80523, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
van Andel M, Tildesley MJ, Gates MC. Challenges and opportunities for using national animal datasets to support foot-and-mouth disease control. Transbound Emerg Dis 2020; 68:1800-1813. [PMID: 32986919 DOI: 10.1111/tbed.13858] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2020] [Revised: 09/20/2020] [Accepted: 09/21/2020] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
National level databases of animal numbers, locations and movements provide the essential foundations for disease preparedness, outbreak investigations and control activities. These activities are particularly important for managing and mitigating the risks of high-impact transboundary animal disease outbreaks such as foot-and-mouth disease (FMD), which can significantly affect international trade access and domestic food security. In countries where livestock production systems are heavily subsidized by the government, producers are often required to provide detailed animal movement and demographic data as a condition of business. In the remaining countries, it can be difficult to maintain these types of databases and impossible to estimate the extent of missing or inaccurate information due to the absence of gold standard datasets for comparison. Consequently, competent authorities are often required to make decisions about disease preparedness and control based on available data, which may result in suboptimal outcomes for their livestock industries. It is important to understand the limitations of poor data quality as well as the range of methods that have been developed to compensate in both disease-free and endemic situations. Using FMD as a case example, this review first discusses the different activities that competent authorities use farm-level animal population data for to support (1) preparedness activities in disease-free countries, (2) response activities during an acute outbreak in a disease-free country, and (3) eradication and control activities in an endemic country. We then discuss (4) data requirements needed to support epidemiological investigations, surveillance, and disease spread modelling both in disease-free and endemic countries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mary van Andel
- Ministry for Primary Industries, Operations Branch, Diagnostic and Surveillance Services Directorate, Wallaceville, New Zealand
| | - Michael J Tildesley
- School of Life Sciences, Gibbet Hill Campus, The University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
| | - M Carolyn Gates
- School of Veterinary Science, Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Boden LA, Voas S, Mellor D, Auty H. EPIC, Scottish Government's Centre of Expertise in Animal Disease Outbreaks: A Model for Provision of Risk-Based Evidence to Policy. Front Vet Sci 2020; 7:119. [PMID: 32211431 PMCID: PMC7066993 DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2020.00119] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/05/2019] [Accepted: 02/18/2020] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
EPIC, Scottish Government's Centre of Expertise on Animal Disease Outbreaks, offers a successful and innovative model for provision of scientific advice and analysis to policy-makers in Scotland. In this paper, we describe EPIC's remit and operations, and reflect on three case studies which illustrate how the Centre of Expertise Model provides risk-based evidence through rapid access to emergency advice and analyses, estimating disease risks and improving disease detection, assessing different disease control options, and improving future risk resilience. The successes and challenges faced by EPIC and its members offer useful lessons for animal health researchers and authorities, working in contingency planning for animal health security in other countries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lisa A Boden
- Global Academy of Agriculture and Food Security, The Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies and The Roslin Institute, Midlothian, United Kingdom
| | - Sheila Voas
- Animal Health and Welfare Division, Scottish Government, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - Dominic Mellor
- School of Veterinary Medicine, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom
| | - Harriet Auty
- Epidemiology Research Unit, Scotland's Rural College (SRUC), Inverness, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Walz E, Evanson J, Sampedro F, VanderWaal K, Goldsmith T. Planning "Plan B": The Case of Moving Cattle From an Infected Feedlot Premises During a Hypothetical Widespread FMD Outbreak in the United States. Front Vet Sci 2020; 6:484. [PMID: 31998764 PMCID: PMC6964524 DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2019.00484] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/06/2019] [Accepted: 12/09/2019] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
In the event of a foot-and-mouth disease (FMD) outbreak in the United States, "stamping out" FMD infected premises has been proposed as the method of choice for the control of outbreaks. However, if a widespread, catastrophic FMD outbreak in the U.S. were to occur, alternative solutions to stamping out may be required, particularly for large feedlots with over 10,000 cattle. Such strategies include moving cattle from infected or not known to be infected operations to slaughter facilities either with or without prior implementation of vaccination. To understand the risk of these strategies, it is important to estimate levels of herd viremia. Multiple factors must be considered when determining risk and feasibility of moving cattle from a feedlot to a slaughter facility during an FMD outbreak. In addition to modeling within-herd disease spread to estimate prevalence of viremic animals, we explore potential pathways for viral spread associated with the movement of asymptomatic beef cattle (either pre-clinical or recovered) from an infected feedlot premises to offsite harvest facilities. This analysis was proactive in nature, however evaluation of the likelihood of disease spread relative to disease (infection) phase, time of movement, and vaccination status are all factors which should be considered in managing and containing a large-scale FMD outbreak in the United States.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emily Walz
- Department of Veterinary and Biomedical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN, United States
| | - Jessica Evanson
- Center for Animal Health and Food Safety, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN, United States
| | - Fernando Sampedro
- Division of Environmental Health Sciences, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States
| | - Kimberly VanderWaal
- Department of Veterinary Population Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN, United States
| | - Timothy Goldsmith
- Department of Veterinary Population Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN, United States
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Barratt AS, Rich KM, Eze JI, Porphyre T, Gunn GJ, Stott AW. Framework for Estimating Indirect Costs in Animal Health Using Time Series Analysis. Front Vet Sci 2019; 6:190. [PMID: 31275949 PMCID: PMC6592220 DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2019.00190] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2018] [Accepted: 05/29/2019] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Traditionally, cost-benefit analyses (CBAs) focus on the direct costs of animal disease, including animal mortality, morbidity, and associated response costs. However, such approaches often fail to capture the wider, dynamic market impacts that could arise. The duration of these market dislocations could last well after an initial disease outbreak. More generally, current approaches also muddle definitions of indirect costs, confusing debate on the scope of the totalities of disease-induced economic impacts. The aim of this work was to clarify definitions of indirect costs in the context of animal diseases and to apply this definition to a time series methodological framework to estimate the indirect costs of animal disease control strategies, using a foot and mouth disease (FMD) outbreak in Scotland as a case study. Time series analysis is an econometric method for analyzing statistical relationships between data series over time, thus allowing insights into how market dynamics may change following a disease outbreak. First an epidemiological model simulated FMD disease dynamics based on alternative control strategies. Output from the epidemiological model was used to quantify direct costs and applied in a multivariate vector error correction model to quantify the indirect costs of alternative vaccine stock strategies as a result of FMD. Indirect costs were defined as the economic losses incurred in markets after disease freedom is declared. As such, our definition of indirect costs captures the knock-on price and quantity effects in six agricultural markets after a disease outbreak. Our results suggest that controlling a FMD epidemic with vaccination is less costly in direct and indirect costs relative to a no vaccination (i.e., "cull only") strategy, when considering large FMD outbreaks in Scotland. Our research clarifies and provides a framework for estimating indirect costs, which is applicable to both exotic and endemic diseases. Standard accounting CBAs only capture activities in isolation, ignore linkages across sectors, and do not consider price effects. However, our framework not only delineates when indirect costs start, but also captures the wider knock-on price effects between sectors, which are often omitted from CBAs but are necessary to support decision-making in animal disease prevention and control strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alyson S Barratt
- Department of Rural Economy, Environment and Society, Scotland's Rural College, Faculty of Rural Science and Policy, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - Karl M Rich
- East and Southeast Asia Regional Office, International Livestock Research Institute, Hanoi, Vietnam.,Epidemiology Research Unit, Department of Veterinary and Animal Science, Northern Faculty, Scotland's Rural College, Inverness, United Kingdom
| | - Jude I Eze
- Epidemiology Research Unit, Department of Veterinary and Animal Science, Northern Faculty, Scotland's Rural College, Inverness, United Kingdom.,Biomathematics and Statistics Scotland, JCMB, The King's Buildings, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - Thibaud Porphyre
- Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, The Roslin Institute, University of Edinburgh, Midlothian, United Kingdom
| | - George J Gunn
- Epidemiology Research Unit, Department of Veterinary and Animal Science, Northern Faculty, Scotland's Rural College, Inverness, United Kingdom
| | - Alistair W Stott
- Department of Rural Economy, Environment and Society, Scotland's Rural College, Faculty of Rural Science and Policy, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Rawdon T, Garner M, Sanson R, Stevenson M, Cook C, Birch C, Roche S, Patyk K, Forde-Folle K, Dubé C, Smylie T, Yu Z. Evaluating vaccination strategies to control foot-and-mouth disease: a country comparison study. Epidemiol Infect 2018; 146:1138-1150. [PMID: 29785893 PMCID: PMC9134278 DOI: 10.1017/s0950268818001243] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/06/2017] [Revised: 04/14/2018] [Accepted: 04/23/2018] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
Vaccination is increasingly being recognised as a potential tool to supplement 'stamping out' for controlling foot-and-mouth disease (FMD) outbreaks in non-endemic countries. Infectious disease simulation models provide the opportunity to determine how vaccination might be used in the face of an FMD outbreak. Previously, consistent relative benefits of specific vaccination strategies across different FMD simulation modelling platforms have been demonstrated, using a UK FMD outbreak scenario. We extended this work to assess the relative effectiveness of selected vaccination strategies in five countries: Australia, New Zealand, the USA, the UK and Canada. A comparable, but not identical, FMD outbreak scenario was developed for each country with initial seeding of Pan Asia type O FMD virus into an area with a relatively high density of livestock farms. A series of vaccination strategies (in addition to stamping out (SO)) were selected to evaluate key areas of interest from a disease response perspective, including timing of vaccination, species considerations (e.g. vaccination of only those farms with cattle), risk area vaccination and resources available for vaccination. The study found that vaccination used with SO was effective in reducing epidemic size and duration in a severe outbreak situation. Early vaccination and unconstrained resources for vaccination consistently outperformed other strategies. Vaccination of only those farms with cattle produced comparable results, with some countries demonstrating that this could be as effective as all species vaccination. Restriction of vaccination to higher risk areas was less effective than other strategies. This study demonstrates consistency in the relative effectiveness of selected vaccination strategies under different outbreak start up conditions conditional on the assumption that each of the simulation models provide a realistic estimation of FMD virus spread. Preferred outbreak management approaches must however balance the principles identified in this study, working to clearly defined outbreak management objectives, while having a good understanding of logistic requirements and the socio-economic implications of different control measures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T.G. Rawdon
- Diagnostics and Surveillance Services Directorate, Ministry for Primary Industries, Upper Hutt 5140, New Zealand
| | - M.G. Garner
- Department of Agriculture and Water Resources, Epidemiology and One Health Program, Canberra City ACT 2016, Australia
| | - R.L. Sanson
- AsureQuality Limited, Palmerston North 4440, New Zealand
| | - M.A. Stevenson
- Faculty of Veterinary and Agricultural Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville Victoria 3010, Australia
| | - C. Cook
- Animal and Plant Health Agency (APHA), Weybridge, UK
| | - C. Birch
- Animal and Plant Health Agency (APHA), Weybridge, UK
| | - S.E. Roche
- Department of Agriculture and Water Resources, Epidemiology and One Health Program, Canberra City ACT 2016, Australia
| | - K.A. Patyk
- United States Department of Agriculture, Science Technology and Analysis Services, Veterinary Services, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, Colorado, USA
| | - K.N. Forde-Folle
- United States Department of Agriculture, Science Technology and Analysis Services, Veterinary Services, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, Colorado, USA
| | - C. Dubé
- Animal Health Risk Assessment Unit, Canadian Food Inspection Agency, Ontario, Canada
| | - T. Smylie
- Foreign Animal Disease Section, Canadian Food Inspection Agency, Ontario, Canada
| | - Z.D. Yu
- Readiness and Response Services Directorate, Ministry for Primary Industries, Wellington 6140, New Zealand
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Van Andel M, Hollings T, Bradhurst R, Robinson A, Burgman M, Gates MC, Bingham P, Carpenter T. Does Size Matter to Models? Exploring the Effect of Herd Size on Outputs of a Herd-Level Disease Spread Simulator. Front Vet Sci 2018; 5:78. [PMID: 29780811 PMCID: PMC5946670 DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2018.00078] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2017] [Accepted: 03/27/2018] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Disease spread modeling is widely used by veterinary authorities to predict the impact of emergency animal disease outbreaks in livestock and to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of different management interventions. Such models require knowledge of basic disease epidemiology as well as information about the population of animals at risk. Essential demographic information includes the production system, animal numbers, and their spatial locations yet many countries with significant livestock industries do not have publically available and accurate animal population information at the farm level that can be used in these models. The impact of inaccuracies in data on model outputs and the decisions based on these outputs is seldom discussed. In this analysis, we used the Australian Animal Disease model to simulate the spread of foot-and-mouth disease seeded into high-risk herds in six different farming regions in New Zealand. We used three different susceptible animal population datasets: (1) a gold standard dataset comprising known herd sizes, (2) a dataset where herd size was simulated from a beta-pert distribution for each herd production type, and (3) a dataset where herd size was simplified to the median herd size for each herd production type. We analyzed the model outputs to compare (i) the extent of disease spread, (ii) the length of the outbreaks, and (iii) the possible impacts on decisions made for simulated outbreaks in different regions. Model outputs using the different datasets showed statistically significant differences, which could have serious implications for decision making by a competent authority. Outbreak duration, number of infected properties, and vaccine doses used during the outbreak were all significantly smaller for the gold standard dataset when compared with the median herd size dataset. Initial outbreak location and disease control strategy also significantly influenced the duration of the outbreak and number of infected premises. The study findings demonstrate the importance of having accurate national-level population datasets to ensure effective decisions are made before and during disease outbreaks, reducing the damage and cost.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mary Van Andel
- Investigation and Diagnostic Centre, Surveillance and Investigation Team (Animal Health), Operations Branch, Ministry for Primary Industries, Wallaceville, New Zealand
| | - Tracey Hollings
- Centre of Excellence for Biosecurity Risk Analysis, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Richard Bradhurst
- Centre of Excellence for Biosecurity Risk Analysis, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Andrew Robinson
- Centre of Excellence for Biosecurity Risk Analysis, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Mark Burgman
- Centre of Excellence for Biosecurity Risk Analysis, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.,Centre for Environmental Policy, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - M Carolyn Gates
- Epicentre, Institute of Veterinary, Animal and Biomedical Sciences, Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand
| | - Paul Bingham
- Investigation and Diagnostic Centre, Surveillance and Investigation Team (Animal Health), Operations Branch, Ministry for Primary Industries, Wallaceville, New Zealand
| | - Tim Carpenter
- Epicentre, Institute of Veterinary, Animal and Biomedical Sciences, Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Porphyre T, Rich KM, Auty HK. Assessing the Economic Impact of Vaccine Availability When Controlling Foot and Mouth Disease Outbreaks. Front Vet Sci 2018; 5:47. [PMID: 29594161 PMCID: PMC5859371 DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2018.00047] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2017] [Accepted: 02/23/2018] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Predictive models have been used extensively to assess the likely effectiveness of vaccination policies as part of control measures in the event of a foot and mouth disease (FMD) outbreak. However, the availability of vaccine stocks and the impact of vaccine availability on disease control strategies represent a key uncertainty when assessing potential control strategies. Using an epidemiological, spatially explicit, simulation model in combination with a direct cost calculator, we assessed how vaccine availability constraints may affect the economic benefit of a “vaccination-to-live” strategy during a FMD outbreak in Scotland, when implemented alongside culling of infected premises and dangerous contacts. We investigated the impact of vaccine stock size and restocking delays on epidemiological and economic outcomes. We also assessed delays in the initial decision to vaccinate, maximum daily vaccination capacity, and vaccine efficacy. For scenarios with conditions conducive to large outbreaks, all vaccination strategies perform better than the strategy where only culling is implemented. A stock of 200,000 doses, enough to vaccinate 12% of the Scottish cattle population, would be sufficient to maximize the relative benefits of vaccination, both epidemiologically and economically. However, this generates a wider variation in economic cost than if vaccination is not implemented, making outcomes harder to predict. The probability of direct costs exceeding £500 million is reduced when vaccination is used and is steadily reduced further as the size of initial vaccine stock increases. If only a suboptimal quantity of vaccine doses is initially available (100,000 doses), restocking delays of more than 2 weeks rapidly increase the cost of controlling outbreaks. Impacts of low vaccine availability or restocking delays are particularly aggravated by delays in the initial decision to vaccinate, or low vaccine efficacy. Our findings confirm that implementing an emergency vaccination-to-live strategy in addition to the conventional stamping out strategy is economically beneficial in scenarios with conditions conducive to large FMD outbreaks in Scotland. However, the size of the initial vaccine stock available at the start of the outbreak and the interplay with other factors, such as vaccine efficacy and delays in restocking or implementing vaccination, should be considered in making decisions about optimal control strategies for FMD outbreaks.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thibaud Porphyre
- Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, The Roslin Institute, University of Edinburgh, Midlothian, United Kingdom
| | - Karl M Rich
- Epidemiology Research Unit, Scotland's Rural College, Inverness, United Kingdom.,East and Southeast Asia Regional Office, International Livestock Research Institute, Hanoi, Vietnam
| | - Harriet K Auty
- Epidemiology Research Unit, Scotland's Rural College, Inverness, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Mancy R, Brock PM, Kao RR. An Integrated Framework for Process-Driven Model Construction in Disease Ecology and Animal Health. Front Vet Sci 2017; 4:155. [PMID: 29021983 PMCID: PMC5623672 DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2017.00155] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/16/2017] [Accepted: 09/06/2017] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Process models that focus on explicitly representing biological mechanisms are increasingly important in disease ecology and animal health research. However, the large number of process modelling approaches makes it difficult to decide which is most appropriate for a given disease system and research question. Here, we discuss different motivations for using process models and present an integrated conceptual analysis that can be used to guide the construction of infectious disease process models and comparisons between them. Our presentation complements existing work by clarifying the major differences between modelling approaches and their relationship with the biological characteristics of the epidemiological system. We first discuss distinct motivations for using process models in epidemiological research, identifying the key steps in model design and use associated with each. We then present a conceptual framework for guiding model construction and comparison, organised according to key aspects of epidemiological systems. Specifically, we discuss the number and type of disease states, whether to focus on individual hosts (e.g., cows) or groups of hosts (e.g., herds or farms), how space or host connectivity affect disease transmission, whether demographic and epidemiological processes are periodic or can occur at any time, and the extent to which stochasticity is important. We use foot-and-mouth disease and bovine tuberculosis in cattle to illustrate our discussion and support explanations of cases in which different models are used to address similar problems. The framework should help those constructing models to structure their approach to modelling decisions and facilitate comparisons between models in the literature.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rebecca Mancy
- College of Veterinary, Medical and Life Sciences, Institute of Biodiversity, Animal Health and Comparative Medicine, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom
- Boyd Orr Centre for Population and Ecosystem Health, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom
| | - Patrick M. Brock
- College of Veterinary, Medical and Life Sciences, Institute of Biodiversity, Animal Health and Comparative Medicine, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom
- Boyd Orr Centre for Population and Ecosystem Health, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom
| | - Rowland R. Kao
- College of Veterinary, Medical and Life Sciences, Institute of Biodiversity, Animal Health and Comparative Medicine, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom
- Boyd Orr Centre for Population and Ecosystem Health, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Predicting farm-level animal populations using environmental and socioeconomic variables. Prev Vet Med 2017; 145:121-132. [DOI: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2017.07.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/22/2016] [Revised: 07/04/2017] [Accepted: 07/05/2017] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
|
17
|
Dórea FC, Nöremark M, Widgren S, Frössling J, Boklund A, Halasa T, Ståhl K. Evaluation of Strategies to Control a Potential Outbreak of Foot-and-Mouth Disease in Sweden. Front Vet Sci 2017; 4:118. [PMID: 28791298 PMCID: PMC5523145 DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2017.00118] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2016] [Accepted: 07/07/2017] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
To minimize the potential consequences of an introduction of foot-and-mouth disease (FMD) in Europe, European Union (EU) member states are required to present a contingency plan. This study used a simulation model to study potential outbreak scenarios in Sweden and evaluate the best control strategies. The model was informed by the Swedish livestock structure using herd information from cattle, pig, and small ruminant holdings in the country. The contact structure was based on animal movement data and studies investigating the movements between farms of veterinarians, service trucks, and other farm visitors. All scenarios of outbreak control included depopulation of detected herds, 3 km protection and 10 km surveillance zones, movement tracing, and 3 days national standstill. The effect of availability of surveillance resources, i.e., number of field veterinarians per day, and timeliness of enforcement of interventions, was assessed. With the estimated currently available resources, an FMD outbreak in Sweden is expected to be controlled (i.e., last infected herd detected) within 3 weeks of detection in any evaluated scenario. The density of farms in the area where the epidemic started would have little impact on the time to control the outbreak, but spread in high density areas would require more surveillance resources, compared to areas of lower farm density. The use of vaccination did not result in a reduction in the expected number of infected herds. Preemptive depopulation was able to reduce the number of infected herds in extreme scenarios designed to test a combination of worst-case conditions of virus introduction and spread, but at the cost of doubling the number of herds culled. This likely resulted from a combination of the small outbreaks predicted by the spread model, and the high efficacy of the basic control measures evaluated, under the conditions of the Swedish livestock industry, and considering the assumed control resources available. The results indicate that the duration and extent of FMD outbreaks could be kept limited in Sweden using the EU standard control strategy and a 3 days national standstill.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fernanda C Dórea
- Department of Disease Control and Epidemiology, National Veterinary Institute (SVA), Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Maria Nöremark
- Department of Disease Control and Epidemiology, National Veterinary Institute (SVA), Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Stefan Widgren
- Department of Disease Control and Epidemiology, National Veterinary Institute (SVA), Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Jenny Frössling
- Department of Disease Control and Epidemiology, National Veterinary Institute (SVA), Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Anette Boklund
- Department of Diagnostics and Scientific Advice, The National Veterinary Institute, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Tariq Halasa
- Department of Diagnostics and Scientific Advice, The National Veterinary Institute, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Karl Ståhl
- Department of Disease Control and Epidemiology, National Veterinary Institute (SVA), Uppsala, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Porphyre T, Correia-Gomes C, Chase-Topping ME, Gamado K, Auty HK, Hutchinson I, Reeves A, Gunn GJ, Woolhouse MEJ. Vulnerability of the British swine industry to classical swine fever. Sci Rep 2017; 7:42992. [PMID: 28225040 PMCID: PMC5320472 DOI: 10.1038/srep42992] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2016] [Accepted: 01/18/2017] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Classical swine fever (CSF) is a notifiable, highly contagious viral disease of swine which results in severe welfare and economic consequences in affected countries. To improve preparedness, it is critical to have some understanding of how CSF would spread should it be introduced. Based on the data recorded during the 2000 epidemic of CSF in Great Britain (GB), a spatially explicit, premises-based model was developed to explore the risk of CSF spread in GB. We found that large outbreaks of CSF would be rare and generated from a limited number of areas in GB. Despite the consistently low vulnerability of the British swine industry to large CSF outbreaks, we identified concerns with respect to the role played by the non-commercial sector of the industry. The model further revealed how various epidemiological features may influence the spread of CSF in GB, highlighting the importance of between-farm biosecurity in preventing widespread dissemination of the virus. Knowledge of factors affecting the risk of spread are key components for surveillance planning and resource allocation, and this work provides a valuable stepping stone in guiding policy on CSF surveillance and control in GB.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thibaud Porphyre
- Epidemiology Research Group, Centre for Immunity, Infection and Evolution, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK
| | - Carla Correia-Gomes
- Epidemiology Research Unit, Future Farming Systems, Scotland's Rural College, Inverness, Scotland, UK
| | - Margo E Chase-Topping
- Epidemiology Research Group, Centre for Immunity, Infection and Evolution, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK
| | - Kokouvi Gamado
- Biomathematics &Statistics Scotland, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK
| | - Harriet K Auty
- Epidemiology Research Unit, Future Farming Systems, Scotland's Rural College, Inverness, Scotland, UK
| | - Ian Hutchinson
- Epidemiology Research Unit, Future Farming Systems, Scotland's Rural College, Inverness, Scotland, UK
| | - Aaron Reeves
- Epidemiology Research Unit, Future Farming Systems, Scotland's Rural College, Inverness, Scotland, UK
| | - George J Gunn
- Epidemiology Research Unit, Future Farming Systems, Scotland's Rural College, Inverness, Scotland, UK
| | - Mark E J Woolhouse
- Epidemiology Research Group, Centre for Immunity, Infection and Evolution, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Quantifying the Value of Perfect Information in Emergency Vaccination Campaigns. PLoS Comput Biol 2017; 13:e1005318. [PMID: 28207777 PMCID: PMC5312803 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005318] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2016] [Accepted: 12/19/2016] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Foot-and-mouth disease outbreaks in non-endemic countries can lead to large economic costs and livestock losses but the use of vaccination has been contentious, partly due to uncertainty about emergency FMD vaccination. Value of information methods can be applied to disease outbreak problems such as FMD in order to investigate the performance improvement from resolving uncertainties. Here we calculate the expected value of resolving uncertainty about vaccine efficacy, time delay to immunity after vaccination and daily vaccination capacity for a hypothetical FMD outbreak in the UK. If it were possible to resolve all uncertainty prior to the introduction of control, we could expect savings of £55 million in outbreak cost, 221,900 livestock culled and 4.3 days of outbreak duration. All vaccination strategies were found to be preferable to a culling only strategy. However, the optimal vaccination radius was found to be highly dependent upon vaccination capacity for all management objectives. We calculate that by resolving the uncertainty surrounding vaccination capacity we would expect to return over 85% of the above savings, regardless of management objective. It may be possible to resolve uncertainty about daily vaccination capacity before an outbreak, and this would enable decision makers to select the optimal control action via careful contingency planning. In the UK during 2001 there was an outbreak of foot-and-mouth disease (FMD) which cost the economy an estimated £8 billion and led to the culling of approximately 7 million livestock. The main methods used to control the epidemic were movement bans and culling of infected and high-risk livestock. FMD vaccines were available but not used because of concerns about their effectiveness and how their use would affect the UK’s disease-free status. Using the Warwick FMD model, we ran simulations of FMD outbreaks in the UK including ring vaccination as a method of outbreak control with varying levels of vaccine efficacy, time delay between vaccination and conferral of immunity, and vaccination capacity. We applied value of information analysis to these results and found that the most important factor in determining the optimal vaccination strategy was knowledge of the vaccination capacity. In contrast, vaccine efficacy and delay between vaccination and immunity were relatively unimportant from a decision making perspective. This work could inform contingency planning that would lead to cost savings in the event of a future FMD outbreak and could also be applied to other infectious diseases.
Collapse
|
20
|
Sanson RL, Rawdon T, Owen K, Hickey K, van Andel M, Yu ZD. Evaluating the benefits of vaccination when used in combination with stamping-out measures against hypothetical introductions of foot-and-mouth disease into New Zealand: a simulation study. N Z Vet J 2017; 65:124-133. [DOI: 10.1080/00480169.2016.1263165] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- RL Sanson
- AsureQuality Limited, PO Box 585, Palmerston North 4440, New Zealand
| | - T Rawdon
- Ministry for Primary Industries, Investigation Diagnostic Centres and Response Directorate, 25 The Terrace, Wellington, New Zealand
| | - K Owen
- Ministry for Primary Industries, Investigation Diagnostic Centres and Response Directorate, 25 The Terrace, Wellington, New Zealand
| | - K Hickey
- Ministry for Primary Industries, Investigation Diagnostic Centres and Response Directorate, 25 The Terrace, Wellington, New Zealand
| | - M van Andel
- Ministry for Primary Industries, Investigation Diagnostic Centres and Response Directorate, 25 The Terrace, Wellington, New Zealand
| | - ZD Yu
- Ministry for Primary Industries, Investigation Diagnostic Centres and Response Directorate, 25 The Terrace, Wellington, New Zealand
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Garner MG, East IJ, Stevenson MA, Sanson RL, Rawdon TG, Bradhurst RA, Roche SE, Van Ha P, Kompas T. Early Decision Indicators for Foot-and-Mouth Disease Outbreaks in Non-Endemic Countries. Front Vet Sci 2016; 3:109. [PMID: 27965969 PMCID: PMC5127847 DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2016.00109] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2016] [Accepted: 11/17/2016] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Disease managers face many challenges when deciding on the most effective control strategy to manage an outbreak of foot-and-mouth disease (FMD). Decisions have to be made under conditions of uncertainty and where the situation is continually evolving. In addition, resources for control are often limited. A modeling study was carried out to identify characteristics measurable during the early phase of a FMD outbreak that might be useful as predictors of the total number of infected places, outbreak duration, and the total area under control (AUC). The study involved two modeling platforms in two countries (Australia and New Zealand) and encompassed a large number of incursion scenarios. Linear regression, classification and regression tree, and boosted regression tree analyses were used to quantify the predictive value of a set of parameters on three outcome variables of interest: the total number of infected places, outbreak duration, and the total AUC. The number of infected premises (IPs), number of pending culls, AUC, estimated dissemination ratio, and cattle density around the index herd at days 7, 14, and 21 following first detection were associated with each of the outcome variables. Regression models for the size of the AUC had the highest predictive value (R2 = 0.51-0.9) followed by the number of IPs (R2 = 0.3-0.75) and outbreak duration (R2 = 0.28-0.57). Predictability improved at later time points in the outbreak. Predictive regression models using various cut-points at day 14 to define small and large outbreaks had positive predictive values of 0.85-0.98 and negative predictive values of 0.52-0.91, with 79-97% of outbreaks correctly classified. On the strict assumption that each of the simulation models used in this study provide a realistic indication of the spread of FMD in animal populations. Our conclusion is that relatively simple metrics available early in a control program can be used to indicate the likely magnitude of an FMD outbreak under Australian and New Zealand conditions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael G Garner
- Animal Health Policy Branch, Department of Agriculture and Water Resources , Canberra, ACT , Australia
| | - Iain J East
- Animal Health Policy Branch, Department of Agriculture and Water Resources , Canberra, ACT , Australia
| | - Mark A Stevenson
- Faculty of Veterinary and Agricultural Sciences, University of Melbourne , Parkville, VIC , Australia
| | | | - Thomas G Rawdon
- Investigation and Diagnostic Centre and Response Directorate, Ministry for Primary Industries , Wellington , New Zealand
| | - Richard A Bradhurst
- Centre of Excellence for Biosecurity Risk Analysis, University of Melbourne , Parkville, VIC , Australia
| | - Sharon E Roche
- Animal Health Policy Branch, Department of Agriculture and Water Resources , Canberra, ACT , Australia
| | - Pham Van Ha
- Crawford School of Public Policy, Australian National University , Acton, ACT , Australia
| | - Tom Kompas
- Centre of Excellence for Biosecurity Risk Analysis, University of Melbourne , Parkville, VIC , Australia
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Martin MK, Helm J, Patyk KA. An approach for de-identification of point locations of livestock premises for further use in disease spread modeling. Prev Vet Med 2015; 120:131-140. [PMID: 25944175 DOI: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2015.04.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2014] [Revised: 03/31/2015] [Accepted: 04/17/2015] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
We describe a method for de-identifying point location data used for disease spread modeling to allow data custodians to share data with modeling experts without disclosing individual farm identities. The approach is implemented in an open-source software program that is described and evaluated here. The program allows a data custodian to select a level of de-identification based on the K-anonymity statistic. The program converts a file of true farm locations and attributes into a file appropriate for use in disease spread modeling with the locations randomly modified to prevent re-identification based on location. Important epidemiological relationships such as clustering are preserved to as much as possible to allow modeling similar to those using true identifiable data. The software implementation was verified by visual inspection and basic descriptive spatial analysis of the output. Performance is sufficient to allow de-identification of even large data sets on desktop computers available to any data custodian.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael K Martin
- Livestock Poultry Health Division, Clemson University, Columbia, SC 29224, USA.
| | - Julie Helm
- Livestock Poultry Health Division, Clemson University, Columbia, SC 29224, USA
| | - Kelly A Patyk
- U.S Department of Agriculture, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, Veterinary Services, Science Technology and Analysis Services, Center for Epidemiology and Animal Health, 2150 Centre Avenue, Building B, Fort Collins, CO 80526, USA
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Affiliation(s)
- Sheila Voas
- Chief Veterinary Officer (Scotland); Scottish Government; Animal Health and Welfare; P Spur, Saughton House Broomhouse Drive Edinburgh EH14 1TY UK
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
The use of serosurveys following emergency vaccination, to recover the status of “foot-and-mouth disease free where vaccination is not practised”. Vaccine 2014; 32:7050-6. [DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2014.10.064] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2014] [Revised: 10/20/2014] [Accepted: 10/26/2014] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
|
25
|
Ringa N, Bauch CT. Impacts of constrained culling and vaccination on control of foot and mouth disease in near-endemic settings: a pair approximation model. Epidemics 2014; 9:18-30. [PMID: 25480131 DOI: 10.1016/j.epidem.2014.09.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2014] [Revised: 09/19/2014] [Accepted: 09/21/2014] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Many countries have eliminated foot and mouth disease (FMD), but outbreaks remain common in other countries. Rapid development of international trade in animals and animal products has increased the risk of disease introduction to FMD-free countries. Most mathematical models of FMD are tailored to settings that are normally disease-free, and few models have explored the impact of constrained control measures in a 'near-endemic' spatially distributed host population subject to frequent FMD re-introductions from nearby endemic wild populations, as characterizes many low-income, resource-limited countries. Here we construct a pair approximation model of FMD and investigate the impact of constraints on total vaccine supply for prophylactic and ring vaccination, and constraints on culling rates and cumulative culls. We incorporate natural immunity waning and vaccine waning, which are important factors for near-endemic populations. We find that, when vaccine supply is sufficiently limited, the optimal approach for minimizing cumulative infections combines rapid deployment of ring vaccination during outbreaks with a contrasting approach of careful rationing of prophylactic vaccination over the year, such that supplies last as long as possible (and with the bulk of vaccines dedicated toward prophylactic vaccination). Thus, for optimal long-term control of the disease by vaccination in near-endemic settings when vaccine supply is limited, it is best to spread out prophylactic vaccination as much as possible. Regardless of culling constraints, the optimal culling strategy is rapid identification of infected premises and their immediate contacts at the initial stages of an outbreak, and rapid culling of infected premises and farms deemed to be at high risk of infection (as opposed to culling only the infected farms). Optimal culling strategies are similar when social impact is the outcome of interest. We conclude that more FMD transmission models should be developed that are specific to the challenges of FMD control in near-endemic, low-income countries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N Ringa
- Department of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Guelph, 50 Stone Rd E, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada.
| | - C T Bauch
- Department of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Guelph, 50 Stone Rd E, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada; Department of Applied Mathematics, University of Waterloo, 200 University Avenue, West Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Evaluating vaccination strategies to control foot-and-mouth disease: a model comparison study. Epidemiol Infect 2014; 143:1256-75. [DOI: 10.1017/s0950268814001927] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
SUMMARYSimulation models can offer valuable insights into the effectiveness of different control strategies and act as important decision support tools when comparing and evaluating outbreak scenarios and control strategies. An international modelling study was performed to compare a range of vaccination strategies in the control of foot-and-mouth disease (FMD). Modelling groups from five countries (Australia, New Zealand, USA, UK, The Netherlands) participated in the study. Vaccination is increasingly being recognized as a potentially important tool in the control of FMD, although there is considerable uncertainty as to how and when it should be used. We sought to compare model outputs and assess the effectiveness of different vaccination strategies in the control of FMD. Using a standardized outbreak scenario based on data from an FMD exercise in the UK in 2010, the study showed general agreement between respective models in terms of the effectiveness of vaccination. Under the scenario assumptions, all models demonstrated that vaccination with ‘stamping-out’ of infected premises led to a significant reduction in predicted epidemic size and duration compared to the ‘stamping-out’ strategy alone. For all models there were advantages in vaccinating cattle-only rather than all species, using 3-km vaccination rings immediately around infected premises, and starting vaccination earlier in the control programme. This study has shown that certain vaccination strategies are robust even to substantial differences in model configurations. This result should increase end-user confidence in conclusions drawn from model outputs. These results can be used to support and develop effective policies for FMD control.
Collapse
|