1
|
Rauseo C, Cheng MS. Unlocking Patient Voices: Advancing Physical Therapist Practice With Discrete Choice Experiments. Phys Ther 2024; 104:pzae063. [PMID: 38624225 DOI: 10.1093/ptj/pzae063] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/25/2023] [Revised: 01/07/2024] [Accepted: 03/19/2024] [Indexed: 04/17/2024]
Abstract
As health care moves away from volume-based to value-based delivery, the role of the patient in determining value in health care is now paramount. Thus, health care should be aligned with what matters most to patients. Ascertaining patient preferences is therefore critical if we are to provide patients with care that is meaningful to them. However, preferences are difficult to measure and traditional methods of preference measurement in physical therapy face challenges when attempting to measure such. This perspective makes a case for greater use of the discrete choice experiment (DCE) in physical therapy as a research method to measure patient preferences. The DCE is a research method used to elicit preferences for services or goods. This article addresses the importance of eliciting patient preferences as part of person-centered care in the value-based space, the challenges faced in preference measurement in physical therapy, and how the DCE can alleviate some of those challenges. It also provides examples of the DCE in health care and suggests ways in which it can be effectively used in physical therapist practice to improve the delivery of meaningful rehabilitation services to patients. Implementing greater use of the DCE in physical therapy can improve person-centered physical therapist service delivery and inform policy development that creates cost-effective care which is meaningful to patients. It can further help to highlight the value of physical therapy to population health, and to policy makers as health care moves toward more value-based models.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carla Rauseo
- Department of Physical Therapy, Nova Southeastern University, Fort Lauderdale, Florida, USA
| | - Mingshun Samuel Cheng
- Department of Physical Therapy, Nova Southeastern University, Fort Lauderdale, Florida, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Holdsworth LM, Giannitrapani K, Gamboa RC, O'Hanlon C, Singh N, Walling A, Lindvall C, Lorenz K. Role matters in understanding 'quality' in palliative care: a qualitative analysis of patient, caregiver and practitioner perspectives. BMJ Open 2024; 14:e076768. [PMID: 38233055 PMCID: PMC10806673 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-076768] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2023] [Accepted: 12/01/2023] [Indexed: 01/19/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To compare the discussions from two panels on the concept of palliative care quality for patients with advanced cancer, exploring the priorities reflected in each group's perspectives. DESIGN We convened two RAND-UCLA appropriateness panel discussions on palliative care quality in advanced cancer. Discussions were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. Panel transcripts were analysed thematically using a matrix approach to examine perceptions and experiences of quality. SETTING Discussions were framed within the context of advanced cancer care and palliative care. PARTICIPANTS The patient-caregiver panel had 9 patients with current or a history of cancer and caregivers, and the practitioner panel had 10 expert practitioners representing fields of oncology, primary care, social work, palliative care, nursing, pain management and ethics. RESULTS Our analysis identified three thematic categories for understanding quality common across both groups and nine subthemes within those categories. At the highest level, quality was conceived as: (1) the patient and caregiver experience of care, (2) technical competence and (3) the structure of health system. Among the subthemes, four were present in only one of the two group's discussions: 'purpose and action' was specific to the patient-caregiver panel, whereas 'adhering to best medical practice', 'mitigating unintended consequences and side effects', and 'health system resources and costs' were specific to the practitioner panel. CONCLUSIONS While both panels aligned on the three key domains of quality, the particular dimensions through which they perceived quality varied in relation to their experience and role as a professional provider of care versus recipient of healthcare services. These differences suggest the importance of adopting a collaborative approach to quality measurement and improvement so that the values of all interested parties are represented in improvement efforts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura M Holdsworth
- Division of Primary Care and Population Health, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
- Center for Innovation to Implementation (Ci2i), VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, California, USA
| | - Karleen Giannitrapani
- Division of Primary Care and Population Health, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
- Center for Innovation to Implementation (Ci2i), VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, California, USA
| | - Raziel C Gamboa
- Center for Innovation to Implementation (Ci2i), VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, California, USA
| | - Claire O'Hanlon
- Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation & Policy, VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, California, USA
- RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, California, USA
| | - Nainwant Singh
- Division of Primary Care and Population Health, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
- Center for Innovation to Implementation (Ci2i), VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, California, USA
| | - Anne Walling
- Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation & Policy, VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, California, USA
- Division of General Internal Medicine and Health Services Research, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Charlotta Lindvall
- Department of Psychosocial Oncology and Palliative Care, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Karl Lorenz
- Division of Primary Care and Population Health, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
- Center for Innovation to Implementation (Ci2i), VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Alotaibi MA, Alhowimel AS, Alodaibi FA, Aloraifi M. The Practice of Shared Decision-Making Among Physiotherapists and Patients with Musculoskeletal Conditions. J Multidiscip Healthc 2023; 16:2655-2665. [PMID: 37706183 PMCID: PMC10496844 DOI: 10.2147/jmdh.s425315] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2023] [Accepted: 08/29/2023] [Indexed: 09/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose Shared decision-making (SDM) may be interpreted as a set of core values rather than as a consensus definition. This study aimed to explore how SDM between patients and physiotherapists may lead to patient satisfaction. Patients and Methods A cross-sectional study was conducted to examine the relationship between SDM and patient satisfaction. The study targeted physiotherapists and patients with musculoskeletal pain or disorders. A structured questionnaire (the nine-item Shared Decision-Making Questionnaire) was developed to show the extent to which patients felt involved in the process by scoring nine items from 0 to 5 on a six-point scale. t-tests were performed to estimate differences in SDM perceptions between patients and physiotherapists, and regression analyses were performed to estimate the best predictors of SDM. Results The questionnaire was completed by a total of 106 patients and nine physiotherapists. The demographic information of the samples was presented with frequency analysis. This study's findings demonstrate no variations in the final SDM perceptions between patients and physiotherapists, but when SDM was contrasted step-by-step (as items), many variances were discovered. These distinctions reinforce the notion that regardless of the end outcome, the process of reaching a consensus has a distinct profile depending on the type of medical care. Therapists emphasize the first steps, possibly because there is sufficient evidence to make a therapeutic decision. However, patients highlight the final steps, perhaps because the moment for a decision based on the consultation's nature is approaching. Conclusion This study demonstrates that SDM is a complex process that must be examined in multiple stages. However, in physiotherapy contexts, this process exhibits extremely different patterns, reflecting a significantly different perspective of the decision-making process.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mazyad A Alotaibi
- Department of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University College of Applied Medical Sciences, Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University, Al-Kharj, Saudi Arabia
| | - Ahmed S Alhowimel
- Department of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University College of Applied Medical Sciences, Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University, Al-Kharj, Saudi Arabia
| | - Faris A Alodaibi
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Mohammed Aloraifi
- Salamat Medical Hospital, Department of Physiotherapy, Hail, Saudi Arabia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Hsiao SM, Kuo MC, Hsiao PN, Moi SH, Chiu YW, Wang SL, Chen TH, Kung LF, Hwang SJ, Lee CL. Shared decision-making for renal replacement treatment and illness perception in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2023; 23:159. [PMID: 37580719 PMCID: PMC10426182 DOI: 10.1186/s12911-023-02261-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2023] [Accepted: 08/08/2023] [Indexed: 08/16/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Current healthcare trends emphasize the use of shared decision-making (SDM) for renal replacement treatment (RRT) in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). This is crucial to understand the relationship between SDM and illness perception of CKD patients. Few studies have focused on SDM and illness perception status of CKD patients and the impact of illness perception on RRT after SDM. METHODS In this cross-sectional study, we used a questionnaire with purposive sampling from March 2019 to February 2020 at the nephrology outpatient department of a medical center in southern Taiwan. The nephrology medical team in this study used the SHARE five-step model of SDM to communicate with the patients about RRT and Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire (BIPQ) was applied to evaluate illness perception of these patients at the beginning of SDM. According to the SDM decision time, the study participants were classified general and delayed SDM groups. The distribution between SDM groups was estimated using independent two sample t-test, chi-squared test or Fisher's exact test. The correlation between illness perception and SDM decision time were illustrated and evaluated using Spearman's correlation test. A p-value less than 0.05 is statistically significant. RESULTS A total of 75 patients were enrolled in this study. The average time to make a dialysis decision after initiating SDM was 166.2 ± 178.1 days. 51 patients were classified as general group, and 24 patients were classified as delayed group. The median SDM decision time of delayed group were significantly longer than general group (56 vs. 361 days, P < 0.001). Our findings revealed that delayed group was significantly characterized with not created early surgical assess (delayed vs. general: 66.7% vs. 27.5%, p = 0.001) compared to general group. The average BIPQ score was 54.0 ± 8.1 in our study. We classified the patients into high and low illness perception group according to the median score of BIPQ. The total score of BIPQ in overall participants might increase by the SDM decision time (rho = 0.83, p = 0.830) and the linear regression line also showed consistent trends between BIPQ and SDM decision time in correspond cohorts. However, no statistically significant findings were found. CONCLUSIONS The patients with advanced chronic kidney disease took an average of five and a half months to make a RRT decision after undergoing SDM. Although there is no statistical significance, the trend of illness perception seems correlated with decision-making time. The stronger the illness perception, the longer the decision-making time. Furthermore, shorter decision times may be associated with earlier establishment of surgical access. We need more research exploring the relationship between illness perception and SDM for RRT in CKD patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shih-Ming Hsiao
- Department of Nursing, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, 807, Taiwan
| | - Mei-Chuan Kuo
- Department of Nephrology, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, 807, Taiwan
- School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, 807, Taiwan
| | - Pei-Ni Hsiao
- Department of Nursing, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, 807, Taiwan
| | - Sin-Hua Moi
- Graduate Institute of Clinical Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, 807, Taiwan
| | - Yi-Wen Chiu
- Department of Nephrology, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, 807, Taiwan
- School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, 807, Taiwan
| | - Shu-Li Wang
- Department of Nursing, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, 807, Taiwan
| | - Tzu-Hui Chen
- Department of Nursing, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, 807, Taiwan
| | - Lan-Fang Kung
- Department of Nursing, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, 807, Taiwan
| | - Shang-Jyh Hwang
- Department of Nephrology, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, 807, Taiwan
- School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, 807, Taiwan
| | - Chia-Lun Lee
- Department of Nursing, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, 807, Taiwan.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Morera-Balaguer J, Martínez-González MC, Río-Medina S, Zamora-Conesa V, Leal-Clavel M, Botella-Rico JM, Leirós-Rodríguez R, Rodríguez-Nogueira Ó. The influence of the environment on the patient-centered therapeutic relationship in physical therapy: a qualitative study. Arch Public Health 2023; 81:92. [PMID: 37198648 DOI: 10.1186/s13690-023-01064-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2022] [Accepted: 03/18/2023] [Indexed: 05/19/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Currently, in the scientific literature there is a great interest on the study of strategies to implement patient-centered care. One of the main tools for this is the therapeutic relationship. Some studies suggest that the perception of the environment in which the treatment takes place can influence the perception of its quality, but this is not explored in physical therapy. For all these reasons, the aim of this study was to understand the influence of the environment in which physical therapy treatment takes place on the patients' perception of the quality of the patient-centered therapeutic relationship in public health centers in Spain. METHODS A qualitative study analysed thematically using a modified grounded theory approach. Data collection used semistructured interviewing during focus groups. RESULTS We conducted four focus groups. The size of the focus groups ranged from six to nine participants. In total, 31 patients participated in these focus groups. Participants described a series of specific experiences and perceptions relating to the environment, which they felt were influential in the establishment of therapeutic patient-centered relationships, including six physical factors (Architectural barriers, Furniture, Use of the computer, Physical space, Ambiet conditions, and Privacy) and six organizational factors (Patient-physical therapist ratio, Treatment interruptions, Social factors, Continuity with the professional, Lack of professional autonomy, and Coordination or communication among team members). CONCLUSION The results of this study highlight environmental factors that affect the quality of the therapeutic patient-centered relationship in physical therapy from the patient's point of view, and emphasize the need for physical therapists and administrators to underline the need to review these factors and take them into account in their service delivery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jaume Morera-Balaguer
- Nursing and Physical Therapy Department, Health Sciences Faculty, CEU-Cardenal Herrera University, CEU Universities, Elche, 03201, Spain
| | - Mª Carmen Martínez-González
- Nursing and Physical Therapy Department, Health Sciences Faculty, CEU-Cardenal Herrera University, CEU Universities, Elche, 03201, Spain
| | - Sonia Río-Medina
- Nursing and Physical Therapy Department, Health Sciences Faculty, CEU-Cardenal Herrera University, CEU Universities, Elche, 03201, Spain
| | - Víctor Zamora-Conesa
- Nursing and Physical Therapy Department, Health Sciences Faculty, CEU-Cardenal Herrera University, CEU Universities, Elche, 03201, Spain
| | - Marina Leal-Clavel
- Nursing and Physical Therapy Department, Health Sciences Faculty, CEU-Cardenal Herrera University, CEU Universities, Elche, 03201, Spain
| | - José Martín Botella-Rico
- Nursing and Physical Therapy Department, Health Sciences Faculty, CEU-Cardenal Herrera University, CEU Universities, Elche, 03201, Spain
| | - Raquel Leirós-Rodríguez
- SALBIS Research Group, Nursing and Physical Therapy Department, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of León, Astorga Ave. 15, Ponferrada, 24401, Spain.
| | - Óscar Rodríguez-Nogueira
- SALBIS Research Group, Nursing and Physical Therapy Department, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of León, Astorga Ave. 15, Ponferrada, 24401, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Miller T, Reihlen M. Assessing the impact of patient-involvement healthcare strategies on patients, providers, and the healthcare system: A systematic review. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING 2023; 110:107652. [PMID: 36804578 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2023.107652] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2022] [Revised: 01/30/2023] [Accepted: 01/31/2023] [Indexed: 06/18/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patient involvement has become an important and lively field of research, yet existing findings are fragmented and often contested. Without a synthesis of the research field, these findings are of limited use to scholars, healthcare providers, or policy-makers. OBJECTIVE Examine the body of knowledge on patient involvement to determine what is known, contested, and unknown about benefits, risks, and effective implementation strategies. PATIENT INVOLVEMENT Patients were not involved. METHODS Systematic literature review of 99 journal articles using a conceptual model integrating three levels: health systems, health providers, and patients. We extracted individual research findings and organized them into the structure of our model to provide a holistic picture of patient involvement. RESULTS The review highlights overlaps and conflicts between various patient involvement approaches. Our results show benefits for individual patients and the health system as a whole. At the provider level, however, we identified clear barriers to patient involvement. DISCUSSION Patient involvement requires collaboration among health systems, healthcare providers, and patients. We showed that increasing patient responsibility and health literacy requires policy-maker interventions. This includes incentives for patient education by providers, adapting medical education curricula, and building a database of reliable health information and decision support for patients. Furthermore, policies supporting a common infrastructure for digital health data and managed patient data exchange will foster provider collaboration. PRACTICAL VALUE Our review shows how an approach integrating health systems, healthcare providers, and patients can make patient involvement more effective than isolated interventions. Such systematic patient involvement is likely to improve population health literacy and healthcare quality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas Miller
- Institute of Management and Organization, Leuphana University Lüneburg, Lüneburg, Germany.
| | - Markus Reihlen
- Institute of Management and Organization, Leuphana University Lüneburg, Lüneburg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Oyekan AA, Lee JY, Hodges JC, Chen SR, Wilson AE, Fourman MS, Clayton EO, Njoku-Austin C, Crasto JA, Wisniewski MK, Bilderback A, Gunn SR, Levin WI, Arnold RM, Hinrichsen KL, Mensah C, Hogan MV, Hall DE. Increasing Quality and Frequency of Goals-of-Care Documentation in the Highest-Risk Surgical Candidates: One-Year Results of the Surgical Pause Program. JB JS Open Access 2023; 8:JBJSOA-D-22-00107. [PMID: 37101601 PMCID: PMC10125643 DOI: 10.2106/jbjs.oa.22.00107] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/28/2023] Open
Abstract
Patient values may be obscured when decisions are made under the circumstances of constrained time and limited counseling. The objective of this study was to determine if a multidisciplinary review aimed at ensuring goal-concordant treatment and perioperative risk assessment in high-risk orthopaedic trauma patients would increase the quality and frequency of goals-of-care documentation without increasing the rate of adverse events. Methods We prospectively analyzed a longitudinal cohort of adult patients treated for traumatic orthopaedic injuries that were neither life- nor limb-threatening between January 1, 2020, and July 1, 2021. A rapid multidisciplinary review termed a "surgical pause" (SP) was available to those who were ≥80 years old, were nonambulatory or had minimal ambulation at baseline, and/or resided in a skilled nursing facility, as well as upon clinician request. Metrics analyzed include the proportion and quality of goals-of-care documentation, rate of return to the hospital, complications, length of stay, and mortality. Statistical analysis utilized the Kruskal-Wallis rank and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests for continuous variables and the likelihood-ratio chi-square test for categorical variables. Results A total of 133 patients were either eligible for the SP or referred by a clinician. Compared with SP-eligible patients who did not undergo an SP, patients who underwent an SP more frequently had goals-of-care notes identified (92.4% versus 75.0%, p = 0.014) and recorded in the appropriate location (71.2% versus 27.5%, p < 0.001), and the notes were more often of high quality (77.3% versus 45.0%, p < 0.001). Mortality rates were nominally higher among SP patients, but these differences were not significant (10.6% versus 5.0%, 5.1% versus 0.0%, and 14.3% versus 7.9% for in-hospital, 30-day, and 90-day mortality, respectively; p > 0.08 for all). Conclusions The pilot program indicated that an SP is a feasible and effective means of increasing the quality and frequency of goals-of-care documentation in high-risk operative candidates whose traumatic orthopaedic injuries are neither life- nor limb-threatening. This multidisciplinary program aims for goal-concordant treatment plans that minimize modifiable perioperative risks. Level of Evidence Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anthony A. Oyekan
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
- Pittsburgh Ortho Spine Research (POSR) Group, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
- Email for corresponding author:
| | - Joon Y. Lee
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
- Pittsburgh Ortho Spine Research (POSR) Group, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Jacob C. Hodges
- Wolff Center, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Stephen R. Chen
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
- Pittsburgh Ortho Spine Research (POSR) Group, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Alan E. Wilson
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Mitchell S. Fourman
- Pittsburgh Ortho Spine Research (POSR) Group, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY
| | - Elizabeth O. Clayton
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | | | - Jared A. Crasto
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Spine Institute of Arizona, Scottsdale, Arizona
| | - Mary Kay Wisniewski
- Wolff Center, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Andrew Bilderback
- Wolff Center, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Scott R. Gunn
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - William I. Levin
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Robert M. Arnold
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
- Section of Palliative Care and Medical Ethics, Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Katie L. Hinrichsen
- Wolff Center, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Christopher Mensah
- Wolff Center, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - MaCalus V. Hogan
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
- Wolff Center, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Daniel E. Hall
- Wolff Center, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
- Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center, Veterans Affairs Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
- Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion, Veterans Affairs Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
O’Hanlon CE, Giannitrapani KF, Gamboa RC, Walling AM, Lindvall C, Garrido M, Asch SM, Lorenz KA. Integrating Patient and Expert Perspectives to Conceptualize High-Quality Palliative Cancer Care for Symptoms in the US Veterans Health Administration: A Qualitative Study. INQUIRY : A JOURNAL OF MEDICAL CARE ORGANIZATION, PROVISION AND FINANCING 2023; 60:469580231160374. [PMID: 36891952 PMCID: PMC9998402 DOI: 10.1177/00469580231160374] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2022] [Revised: 02/01/2023] [Accepted: 02/10/2023] [Indexed: 03/10/2023]
Abstract
Quality measurement is typically the domain of clinical experts and health system leaders; patient/caregiver perspectives are rarely solicited. We aimed to describe and integrate clinician and patient/caregiver conceptualizations of high-quality palliative symptom care for patients receiving care for advanced cancer within the US Veterans Health Administration in the context of existing quality measures. We conducted a secondary qualitative analysis of transcripts from prioritization discussions of process quality measures relevant to cancer palliative care. These discussions occurred during 2 modified RAND-UCLA appropriateness panels: a panel of 10 palliative care clinical expert stakeholders (7 physicians, 2 nurses, 1 social worker) and a panel of 9 patients/caregivers with cancer experience. Discussions were recorded, transcribed, and independently double-coded using an a priori logical framework. Content analysis was used to identify subthemes within codes and axial coding was used to identify crosscutting themes. Patients/caregivers and clinical experts contributed important perspectives to 3 crosscutting themes. First, proactive elicitation of symptoms is critical. Patients/caregivers especially emphasized importance of comprehensive and proactive screening and assessment, especially for pain and mental health. Second, screening and assessment alone is not enough; information elicited from patients must inform care. Measuring screening/assessment and management care processes separately has important limitations. Lastly, high-quality symptom management can be broadly defined if it is patient-centered; high-quality care takes an individualized approach and might include non-medical or non-pharmacological symptom management. Integrating the perspectives of clinical experts and patients/caregivers is critical for health systems to consider as they design and implement quality measures for palliative cancer care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claire E. O’Hanlon
- RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA, USA
- Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation and Policy (CSHIIP), Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Karleen F. Giannitrapani
- Center for Innovation to Implementation (Ci2i), Palo Alto, CA, USA
- Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Raziel C. Gamboa
- Center for Innovation to Implementation (Ci2i), Palo Alto, CA, USA
- Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Anne M. Walling
- Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation and Policy (CSHIIP), Los Angeles, CA, USA
- University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Charlotta Lindvall
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
- Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Melissa Garrido
- Partnered Evidence-Based Policy Resource Center (PEPReC), Boston, MA, USA
- Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, USA
| | - Steven M. Asch
- Center for Innovation to Implementation (Ci2i), Palo Alto, CA, USA
- Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Karl A. Lorenz
- Center for Innovation to Implementation (Ci2i), Palo Alto, CA, USA
- Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Rodríguez-Nogueira Ó, Leirós-Rodríguez R, Pinto-Carral A, Álvarez-Álvarez MJ, Morera-Balaguer J, Moreno-Poyato AR. The association between empathy and the physiotherapy-patient therapeutic alliance: A cross-sectional study. Musculoskelet Sci Pract 2022; 59:102557. [PMID: 35338901 DOI: 10.1016/j.msksp.2022.102557] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2021] [Revised: 03/15/2022] [Accepted: 03/18/2022] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The central component of person-centred care is in having a therapeutic realtionship. Furthermore, the empathy of the physiotherapist is one of the most important attributes in achieving a successful therapeutic alliance. OBJECTIVE The aim of the research was to determine the association between the constructs of empathy and therapeutic alliance in Spanish physical therapists and the possible influence of socio-professional variables on them. DESIGN Cross-sectional research. METHODS An electronic survey including the Working Alliance Inventory-Short Form, the Interpersonal Reactivity Index and sociodemographic data with 473 Spanish physiotherapists. A descriptive, bivariate and simple lineal regression analysis was carried out. RESULTS Work experience has a positive influence on bonding and the agreement on objectives and tasks (0.04 < B > 0.06; p < 0.01). The perspective taking dimensions and empathic concern positively influence the agreement on achievement (0.14 < B > 0.19; p < 0.001). Personal distress inversely influences bonding and the agreement on achievements and tasks (-0.13 < B > -0.09; p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS The dimensions of perspective taking and empathic concern seem to facilitate successful shared decision making in terms of treating objectives. Furthermore, the physiotherapist's personal distress acts as an obstacle to the development of the three subcomponents of the therapeutic alliance analysed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Óscar Rodríguez-Nogueira
- SALBIS Research Group, Department of Nursing and Physiotherapy, Universidad de León, Astorga Ave. 15, 24401, Ponferrada, León, Spain.
| | - Raquel Leirós-Rodríguez
- SALBIS Research Group, Department of Nursing and Physiotherapy, Universidad de León, Astorga Ave. 15, 24401, Ponferrada, León, Spain.
| | - Arrate Pinto-Carral
- SALBIS Research Group, Department of Nursing and Physiotherapy, Universidad de León, Astorga Ave. 15, 24401, Ponferrada, León, Spain.
| | - María José Álvarez-Álvarez
- SALBIS Research Group, Department of Nursing and Physiotherapy, Universidad de León, Astorga Ave. 15, 24401, Ponferrada, León, Spain.
| | - Jaume Morera-Balaguer
- Physical Therapy Department, CEU Universities, Universidad Cardenal Herrera-CEU, Carrer Carmelitas 3, 03203, Elche, Alicante, Spain.
| | - Antonio R Moreno-Poyato
- Department of Public Health, Mental Health and Maternal and Child Health Nursing, Universitat de Barcelona, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
O'Hanlon CE, Giannitrapani KF, Lindvall C, Gamboa RC, Canning M, Asch SM, Garrido MM, Walling AM, Lorenz KA. Patient and Caregiver Prioritization of Palliative and End-of-Life Cancer Care Quality Measures. J Gen Intern Med 2022; 37:1429-1435. [PMID: 34405352 PMCID: PMC9086093 DOI: 10.1007/s11606-021-07041-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/04/2021] [Accepted: 07/14/2021] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Development and prioritization of quality measures typically relies on experts in clinical medicine, but patients and their caregivers may have different perspectives on quality measurement priorities. OBJECTIVE To inform priorities for health system implementation of palliative cancer and end-of-life care quality measures by eliciting perspectives of patients and caregivers. DESIGN Using modified RAND-UCLA Appropriateness Panel methods and materials tailored for knowledgeable lay participants, we convened a panel to rate cancer palliative care process quality measure concepts before and after a 1-day, in-person meeting. PARTICIPANTS Nine patients and caregivers with experience living with or caring for patients with cancer. MAIN MEASURES Panelists rated each concept on importance for providing patient- and family-centered care on a nine-point scale and each panelist nominated five highest priority measure concepts ("top 5"). KEY RESULTS Cancer patient and caregiver panelists rated all measure concepts presented as highly important to patient- and family- centered care (median rating ≥ 7) in pre-panel (mean rating range, 6.9-8.8) and post-panel ratings (mean rating range, 7.2-8.9). Forced choice nominations of the "top 5" helped distinguish similarly rated measure concepts. Measure concepts nominated into the "top 5" by three or more panelists included two measure concepts of communication (goals of care discussions and discussion of prognosis), one measure concept on providing comprehensive assessments of patients, and three on symptoms including pain management plans, improvement in pain, and depression management plans. Patients and caregivers nominated one additional measure concept (pain screening) back into consideration, bringing the total number of measure concepts under consideration to 21. CONCLUSIONS Input from cancer patients and caregivers helped identify quality measurement priorities for health system implementation. Forced choice nominations were useful to discriminate concepts with the highest perceived importance. Our approach serves as a model for incorporating patient and caregiver priorities in quality measure development and implementation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claire E O'Hanlon
- Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation and Policy (CSHIIP), VA Greater Los Angeles Health Care System, Los Angeles, CA, USA. Claire.O'
| | - Karleen F Giannitrapani
- Center for Innovation to Implementation (Ci2i), VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, CA, USA.,Division of Primary Care and Population Health, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Charlotta Lindvall
- Department of Psychosocial Oncology and Palliative Care (POPC), Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA.,Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Raziel C Gamboa
- Center for Innovation to Implementation (Ci2i), VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, CA, USA
| | - Mark Canning
- Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation and Policy (CSHIIP), VA Greater Los Angeles Health Care System, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Steven M Asch
- Center for Innovation to Implementation (Ci2i), VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, CA, USA.,Division of Primary Care and Population Health, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Melissa M Garrido
- Partnered Evidence-Based Policy Resource Center (PEPReC), VA Boston Healthcare System Research & Development, Boston, MA, USA.,Department of Health Law, Policy and Management, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, USA
| | | | - Anne M Walling
- Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation and Policy (CSHIIP), VA Greater Los Angeles Health Care System, Los Angeles, CA, USA.,Division of General Internal Medicine and Health Services Research, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Karl A Lorenz
- Center for Innovation to Implementation (Ci2i), VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, CA, USA.,Division of Primary Care and Population Health, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Martinez Paredes JF, Al Fakir R, Rutt AL. Clinical Symptoms Contributing to Zenker's Diverticulum Repair: A Retrospective Review. Cureus 2022; 14:e22369. [PMID: 35371686 PMCID: PMC8940557 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.22369] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
|
12
|
Delaney FT, Doinn TÓ, Broderick JM, Stanley E. Readability of patient education materials related to radiation safety: What are the implications for patient-centred radiology care? Insights Imaging 2021; 12:148. [PMID: 34674063 PMCID: PMC8531160 DOI: 10.1186/s13244-021-01094-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2021] [Accepted: 09/22/2021] [Indexed: 01/19/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Increasing numbers of patients and carers rely on online resources for healthcare information. Radiation safety can be misunderstood by patients and clinicians and lead to patient anxiety. We aimed to assess the readability of online patient educational materials (PEMs) related to radiation safety. METHODS A total of 84 articles pertaining to radiation safety from 14 well-known online resources were identified. PEMs were then analysed using Readability Studio Professional Edition Version 2019. Readability was assessed using eight different instruments: the Flesch-Kincaid Reading Grade Level, Raygor Estimate, SMOG, Coleman-Liau, Fry, FORCAST, Gunning Fog, and Flesch Reading Ease Score formula. The mean reading grade level (RGL) of each article was compared to the 6th and 8th grade reading level using 1-sample t-tests. RESULTS The cumulative mean RGL for all 84 articles was 13.3 (range = 8.6-17.4), and none were written at or below the 6th or 8th grade level. The cumulative mean RGL exceeded the 6th grade reading level by an average of 7.3 levels (95% CI, 6.8-7.8; p < 0.001) and the 8th grade level by an average of 5.3 grade levels (95% CI, 4.8-5.8; p < 0.001). The mean Flesch Reading Ease Score was 39/100 ('difficult'). CONCLUSION Currently available online PEMs related to radiation safety are still written at higher than recommended reading levels. Radiation safety is a topic in which the specialist training of radiologists is crucial in providing guidance to patients. Addressing the readability of online PEMs can improve radiology-patient communication and support the shift to a patient-centred model of practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francis T Delaney
- Department of Radiology, Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
| | - Tiarnán Ó Doinn
- Department of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, Tallaght University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - James M Broderick
- Department of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, Tallaght University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Emma Stanley
- Department of Radiology, Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Webb EJD, Meads D, Lynch Y, Judge S, Randall N, Goldbart J, Meredith S, Moulam L, Hess S, Murray J. Attribute Selection for a Discrete Choice Experiment Incorporating a Best-Worst Scaling Survey. VALUE IN HEALTH : THE JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR PHARMACOECONOMICS AND OUTCOMES RESEARCH 2021; 24:575-584. [PMID: 33840436 DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2020.10.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/09/2020] [Revised: 09/23/2020] [Accepted: 10/30/2020] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Although literature exists on using qualitative methods to generate potential attributes for a discrete choice experiment (DCE), there is little on selecting which attributes to include. We present a case study in which a best-worst scaling case 1 (BWS-1) survey was used to guide attribute selection for a DCE. The case study's context was the decision making of professionals around the choice of augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) systems for children with limited natural speech. METHODS BWS-1 survey attributes were generated from literature reviews and focus groups. DCE attributes were selected from BWS-1 attributes. The selection criteria were: include mostly important attributes; create coherent descriptions of children and AAC systems; address the project's research aims; have an appropriate respondent burden. Attributes' importance was judged using BWS-1 relative importance scores. RESULTS The BWS-1 survey included 19 child and 18 AAC device/system attributes and was administered to N = 93 AAC professionals. Four child and five device/system attributes were selected for the DCE, administered to N = 155 AAC professionals. CONCLUSIONS In this case study BWS-1 results were useful in DCE attribute selection. Four recommendations are made for future studies: define selection criteria for DCE attributes a priori; consider the impact participant's perspective will have on BWS-1 and DCE results; clearly define key terminology at the start of the study and refine it as the study progresses to reflect interim findings; BWS will be useful when there is little existing stated preference work on a topic and/or qualitative work is difficult.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edward J D Webb
- Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, England, UK; Choice Modelling Centre, University of Leeds, Leeds, England, UK.
| | - David Meads
- Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, England, UK; Choice Modelling Centre, University of Leeds, Leeds, England, UK
| | - Yvonne Lynch
- Faculty of Health, Psychology and Social Care, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, England, UK
| | - Simon Judge
- Barnsley Assistive Technology Team, Barnsley Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Barnsley, England, UK; Institute for Transport Studies, University of Leeds, Leeds, England, UK
| | - Nicola Randall
- Barnsley Assistive Technology Team, Barnsley Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Barnsley, England, UK
| | - Juliet Goldbart
- Barnsley Assistive Technology Team, Barnsley Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Barnsley, England, UK
| | - Stuart Meredith
- Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, England, UK
| | - Liz Moulam
- Barnsley Assistive Technology Team, Barnsley Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Barnsley, England, UK
| | - Stephane Hess
- Choice Modelling Centre, University of Leeds, Leeds, England, UK
| | - Janice Murray
- Barnsley Assistive Technology Team, Barnsley Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Barnsley, England, UK
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Foster NE, Konstantinou K, Lewis M, Ogollah R, Saunders B, Kigozi J, Jowett S, Bartlam B, Artus M, Hill JC, Hughes G, Mallen CD, Hay EM, van der Windt DA, Robinson M, Dunn KM. Stratified versus usual care for the management of primary care patients with sciatica: the SCOPiC RCT. Health Technol Assess 2020; 24:1-130. [PMID: 33043881 DOI: 10.3310/hta24490] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Sciatica has a substantial impact on patients and society. Current care is 'stepped', comprising an initial period of simple measures of advice and analgesia, for most patients, commonly followed by physiotherapy, and then by more intensive interventions if symptoms fail to resolve. No study has yet tested a model of stratified care in which patients are subgrouped and matched to different care pathways based on their prognosis and clinical characteristics. OBJECTIVES The objectives were to investigate the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a stratified care model compared with usual, non-stratified care. DESIGN This was a two-parallel group, multicentre, pragmatic, 1 : 1 randomised controlled trial. SETTING Participants were recruited from primary care (42 general practices) in North Staffordshire, North Shropshire/Wales and Cheshire in the UK. PARTICIPANTS Eligible patients were aged ≥ 18 years, had suspected sciatica, had access to a mobile phone/landline, were not pregnant, were not receiving treatment for the same problem and had not had previous spinal surgery. INTERVENTIONS In stratified care, a combination of prognostic and clinical criteria associated with referral to spinal specialist services was used to allocate patients to one of three groups for matched care pathways. Group 1 received advice and up to two sessions of physiotherapy, group 2 received up to six sessions of physiotherapy, and group 3 was fast-tracked to magnetic resonance imaging and spinal specialist opinion. Usual care was based on the stepped-care approach without the use of any stratification tools/algorithms. Patients were randomised using a remote web-based randomisation service. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The primary outcome was time to first resolution of sciatica symptoms (six point ordinal scale, collected via text messages). Secondary outcomes (at 4 and 12 months) included pain, function, psychological health, days lost from work, work productivity, satisfaction with care and health-care use. A cost-utility analysis was undertaken over 12 months. A qualitative study explored patients' and clinicians' views of the fast-track care pathway to a spinal specialist. RESULTS A total of 476 patients were randomised (238 in each arm). For the primary outcome, the overall response rate was 89.3% (88.3% and 90.3% in the stratified and usual care arms, respectively). Relief from symptoms was slightly faster (2 weeks median difference) in the stratified care arm, but this difference was not statistically significant (hazard ratio 1.14, 95% confidence interval 0.89 to 1.46; p = 0.288). On average, participants in both arms reported good improvement from baseline, on most outcomes, over time. Following the assessment at the research clinic, most participants in the usual care arm were referred to physiotherapy. CONCLUSIONS The stratified care model tested in this trial was not more clinically effective than usual care, and was not likely to be a cost-effective option. The fast-track pathway was felt to be acceptable to both patients and clinicians; however, clinicians expressed reluctance to consider invasive procedures if symptoms were of short duration. LIMITATIONS Participants in the usual care arm, on average, reported good outcomes, making it challenging to demonstrate superiority of stratified care. The performance of the algorithm used to allocate patients to treatment pathways may have influenced results. FUTURE WORK Other approaches to stratified care may provide superior outcomes for sciatica. TRIAL REGISTRATION Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN75449581. FUNDING This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 24, No. 49. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nadine E Foster
- Primary Care Centre Versus Arthritis, School of Primary, Community and Social Care, Keele University, Keele, UK.,Keele Clinical Trials Unit, Keele University, Keele, UK
| | - Kika Konstantinou
- Primary Care Centre Versus Arthritis, School of Primary, Community and Social Care, Keele University, Keele, UK.,Haywood Hospital, Midlands Partnership Foundation NHS Trust, Stoke-on-Trent, UK
| | - Martyn Lewis
- Primary Care Centre Versus Arthritis, School of Primary, Community and Social Care, Keele University, Keele, UK.,Keele Clinical Trials Unit, Keele University, Keele, UK
| | - Reuben Ogollah
- Primary Care Centre Versus Arthritis, School of Primary, Community and Social Care, Keele University, Keele, UK.,Nottingham Clinical Trials Unit, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Benjamin Saunders
- Primary Care Centre Versus Arthritis, School of Primary, Community and Social Care, Keele University, Keele, UK
| | - Jesse Kigozi
- Health Economics Unit, Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Sue Jowett
- Primary Care Centre Versus Arthritis, School of Primary, Community and Social Care, Keele University, Keele, UK.,Health Economics Unit, Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Bernadette Bartlam
- Primary Care Centre Versus Arthritis, School of Primary, Community and Social Care, Keele University, Keele, UK.,Family Medicine and Primary Care, Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Majid Artus
- Primary Care Centre Versus Arthritis, School of Primary, Community and Social Care, Keele University, Keele, UK
| | - Jonathan C Hill
- Primary Care Centre Versus Arthritis, School of Primary, Community and Social Care, Keele University, Keele, UK
| | - Gemma Hughes
- Keele Clinical Trials Unit, Keele University, Keele, UK
| | - Christian D Mallen
- Primary Care Centre Versus Arthritis, School of Primary, Community and Social Care, Keele University, Keele, UK
| | - Elaine M Hay
- Primary Care Centre Versus Arthritis, School of Primary, Community and Social Care, Keele University, Keele, UK
| | - Danielle A van der Windt
- Primary Care Centre Versus Arthritis, School of Primary, Community and Social Care, Keele University, Keele, UK
| | | | - Kate M Dunn
- Primary Care Centre Versus Arthritis, School of Primary, Community and Social Care, Keele University, Keele, UK
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Kheirkhah F, Larijani RM, Faramarzi M, Yadollahpour MH, Khafri S. Psychological predictors of medical residents' perspectives on shared decision-making with patients: a cross-sectional study. BMC MEDICAL EDUCATION 2020; 20:251. [PMID: 32758228 PMCID: PMC7409460 DOI: 10.1186/s12909-020-02179-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2020] [Accepted: 07/28/2020] [Indexed: 05/10/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Shared Decision Making (SDM) is as ideal model for resident-patient relationship which may improve medical outcomes. Nevertheless, predictive psychological factors influencing residents' perspective regarding SDM are unclear. The current study investigated the relationship between two psychological factors, mental health and personality traits, and residents' views toward SDM. METHOD In a cross-sectional study, 168 medical residents of the Babol University of Medical Sciences studying in 13 field specialties were recruited. The residents completed three questionnaires including Shared Decision-Making Questionnaire (SDM-Q-Doc, physician version), General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12), and Big Five Personality (NEO-FFI). RESULTS Residents had an overall agreement of about 88% regarding SDM with patients. There was no significant difference between male and female residents in terms of the degree of agreement for SDM. Concerning SDM, there was no significant relationship either between residents' views and neuroticism, extraversion, agreeableness, and conscientiousness. In multivariate regression, mental health did not predict the SDM, but openness to experience negatively predicted residents' views concerning SDM (β = - 0.388, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION The residents' personality trait of openness to experience was a significant negative predictor of SDM with patients. A better understanding of how psychological factors relate to residents' perspectives may help clinicians properly discuss the treatment options with the patient thereby encouraging them for SDM or to consider their own preferences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Farzan Kheirkhah
- Infertility and Reproductive Health Research Center, Health Research Institute, Babol University of Medical Sciences, Babol, Iran
| | | | - Mahbobeh Faramarzi
- Infertility and Reproductive Health Research Center, Health Research Institute, Babol University of Medical Sciences, Babol, Iran
- Social Determinants of Health Research Center, Health Research Institute, Babol University of Medical Sciences, Babol, Iran
| | - Mohamahd Hadi Yadollahpour
- Social Determinants of Health Research Center, Health Research Institute, Babol University of Medical Sciences, Babol, Iran
| | - Soraya Khafri
- Social Determinants of Health Research Center, Health Research Institute, Babol University of Medical Sciences, Babol, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Alimohamad H, Yilmaz D, Hamming JF, Schepers A. Identifying Factors Influencing Decision Making in Patients Diagnosed with Carotid Body Tumors: An Exploratory Study. Ann Vasc Surg 2020; 68:159-165. [PMID: 32502676 DOI: 10.1016/j.avsg.2020.05.044] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2020] [Revised: 04/25/2020] [Accepted: 05/02/2020] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Carotid body tumors (CBTs) are rare highly vascularized and slow enlarging tumors arising from the paraganglionic tissue at the carotid bifurcation. Main treatment options for CBTs are surgical resection or "wait and scan" strategy. The choice for either strategy may be equally good medically in many patients. A structured "shared decision making" (SDM) might be helpful for guiding patients. OBJECTIVES To develop an SDM strategy for the surgical treatment, we aim to (1) identify considerations and factors involved in the decision making of patients with CBTs and (2) evaluate the current practice in our clinic and explore the opinions of patients on their treatment. METHODS This exploratory study was conducted in patients of the Leiden University Medical Centre (LUMC), The Netherlands. Patients who met the inclusion criteria were invited for a semi-structured interview. All conversations were fully audiotaped and transcripted. RESULTS Fifteen patients were included and interviewed. Ten of these patients underwent previously surgical resection of at least one tumor. Five patients underwent the wait and scan policy. The most important factors influencing decision making in CBT treatment are family, fears, co-consultants, and doctor-patient relationship. CONCLUSIONS This study has identified the factors influencing decision making in CBT and should be considered during consultations. The decision for surgery or not was mainly influenced by physician preferences and family members' prior experiences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hoda Alimohamad
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Dilek Yilmaz
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Jaap F Hamming
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Abbey Schepers
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Verheijen E, Munts AG, van Haagen O, de Vries D, Dekkers O, van den Hout W, Vleggeert-Lankamp C. Transforaminal epidural injection versus continued conservative care in acute sciatica (TEIAS trial): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. BMC Neurol 2019; 19:216. [PMID: 31481010 PMCID: PMC6719366 DOI: 10.1186/s12883-019-1445-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2019] [Accepted: 08/25/2019] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Sciatica is a condition that is characterised by radicular pain in the leg and primarily caused by a herniated lumbar intervertebral disk. In addition to leg pain, patients can experience back pain, leg numbness and leg weakness resulting in decreased productivity and social activity. The majority of sciatica cases recovers spontaneously and therefore patients are initially treated conservatively with oral pain medication. However, some patients experience intractable pain that severely impedes them and no consensus exists on the optimal conservative treatment to reduce this discomfort in the acute phase of sciatica. The aim of the TEIAS trial is to assess the effectiveness, cost-effectiveness and predictive capability on patient outcome of transforaminal epidural injection (TEI) compared to treatment with standard pain medication. METHODS This study is designed as a prospective, open-label, mono-centered, randomized controlled trial. Patients that visit their general practitioner with complaints of radicular leg pain and meet the selection criteria are asked to participate in this study. Eligible patients will be randomized to treatment with TEI or to treatment with standard oral pain medication. Treatment of TEI will comprise lidocaine with methylprednisolone acetate for L3 and below and lidocaine with dexamethasone above L3. A total of 142 patients will be recruited and follow-up will occur after 1, 2, 4, 10 and 21 weeks for assessment of pain, functionality, patient received recovery and cost-effectiveness. The primary outcome will be the average score for leg pain at 2 weeks. For this outcome we defined a clinically relevant difference as 1.5 on the 11-point NRS scale. DISCUSSION Adequate conservative treatment in the acute phase of sciatica is lacking, particularly for patients with severe symptoms. Focusing on effectiveness, cost-effectiveness and predictive capability on patient outcome of TEI will produce useful information allowing for more lucid decision making in the conservative treatment of sciatica in the acute phase. TRIAL REGISTRATION This trial is registered in the ClinicalTrials.gov database under registry number NCT03924791 on April 23, 2019.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eduard Verheijen
- Department of Neurosurgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, PO Box 9600. 2300, RC Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Alexander G. Munts
- Department of Neurology, Spaarne Gasthuis, Haarlem, /Hoofddorp, The Netherlands
| | - Oscar van Haagen
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Spaarne Gasthuis, Haarlem, /Hoofddorp, The Netherlands
| | - Dirk de Vries
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Spaarne Gasthuis, Haarlem, /Hoofddorp, The Netherlands
| | - Olaf Dekkers
- Department of Epidemiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Wilbert van den Hout
- Department of Biomedical Data Science, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Morera-Balaguer J, Botella-Rico JM, Catalán-Matamoros D, Martínez-Segura OR, Leal-Clavel M, Rodríguez-Nogueira Ó. Patients' experience regarding therapeutic person-centered relationships in physiotherapy services: A qualitative study. Physiother Theory Pract 2019; 37:17-27. [PMID: 31002005 DOI: 10.1080/09593985.2019.1603258] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Abstract
Introduction: Person-centered care has emerged as a key principle in the provision of health and rehabilitation services. To implement this approach, health professionals must strive to develop a person-centered therapeutic relationship. The aim of this study was to explore the barriers and facilitators for the establishment of a person-centered relationship, based on the experience of physiotherapy patients. Methods: A qualitative study was conducted based on four focus groups including 31 participants. The focus group discussions were audiotaped, transcribed verbatim and analyzed thematically using the method of constant comparisons. Results: Patients described specific traits, characteristics and behaviors relating to the health professional, the patient and the environment, that they felt may hinder or favor the establishment of therapeutic person-centered relationships. Some participants focused on aspects concerning the health professional, both regarding their characteristics as well as their relational skills, meaning that the physiotherapist may be responsible for using several strategies in order to put the person at the center of care. Conclusions: Person-centered care and the therapeutic relationship are important aspects in the field of rehabilitation, requiring further studies to improve our understanding of the same, and to inform both health professionals, and managers of health institutions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jaume Morera-Balaguer
- Physiotherapy Department, Health Sciences School, Universidad CEU Cardenal Herrera. Calle Carmelitas , Alicante, Spain
| | - José M Botella-Rico
- Physiotherapy Department, Health Sciences School, Universidad CEU Cardenal Herrera. Calle Carmelitas , Alicante, Spain
| | - Daniel Catalán-Matamoros
- Department of Journalism and Communication, University Carlos III of Madrid , Getafe, Madrid.,Research group Health Sciences, University of Almeria, Calle Universidad de Almería , Almería, Spain
| | | | - Marina Leal-Clavel
- Nursing Department, Health Sciences School, Universidad CEU Cardenal Herrera , Alicante, Spain
| | - Óscar Rodríguez-Nogueira
- Nursing and Physical Therapy Department, Health Sciences School, Universidad de León , Ponferrada, León, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Alzubaidi H, Hussein A, Mc Namara K, Scholl I. Psychometric properties of the Arabic version of the 9-item Shared Decision-Making Questionnaire: the entire process from translation to validation. BMJ Open 2019; 9:e026672. [PMID: 30948608 PMCID: PMC6500381 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026672] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2018] [Revised: 02/04/2019] [Accepted: 02/05/2019] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To translate the German 9-item Shared Decision-Making Questionnaire (SDM-Q-9) to Arabic and assess its psychometric properties for measuring Arabic-speaking patients' perceptions of the shared decision-making (SDM) process. DESIGN Multicentre cross-sectional study. SETTING Secondary healthcare settings; outpatient clinics of 10 major hospitals were selected in four emirates in the United Arab Emirates (Abu Dhabi, Dubai, Sharjah and Umm Al Quwain). PARTICIPANTS Patients with chronic diseases who attended outpatient clinics of participating hospitals. MEASUREMENTS The original German SDM-Q-9 was translated to Arabic. International multiphase translation guidelines and the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-reported measures were used. Various psychometric properties were assessed, including reliability (internal consistency), and construct validity (exploratory factor analysis [EFA] and confirmatory factor analysis [CFA]). RESULTS The final Arabic version of the SDM-Q-9 was tested among 516 secondary care patients. Internal consistency yielded a Cronbach's alpha of 0.929 for the whole scale. EFA showed a one-factorial solution, Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin measure of sampling adequacy was 0.907 and Bartlett's test of sphericity was significant (χ2=3413.69, df=36, p<0.0005). For the CFA, two different models were tested; Model 1 included the nine items and Model 2 was monofactorial that included items 2-9 and thus excluded item 1. Both models were adequate as they produced similar indices. CONCLUSIONS The Arabic version of SDM-Q-9 showed excellent reliability and acceptable validity parameters among secondary care patients. The newly translated Arabic questionnaire is the first psychometrically tested tool that can be used in the 22 member states of the Arab league to assess patients' perspectives on the SDM process.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hamzah Alzubaidi
- College of Pharmacy, Sharjah Institute for Medical Research, University of Sharjah, Sharjah, United Arab Emirates
| | - Amal Hussein
- Family and Community Medicine & Behavioral Sciences, University of Sharjah, College of Medicine, Sharjah, United Arab Emirates
| | | | - Isabelle Scholl
- Department of Medical Psychology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Moore CL, Kaplan SL. A Framework and Resources for Shared Decision Making: Opportunities for Improved Physical Therapy Outcomes. Phys Ther 2018; 98:1022-1036. [PMID: 30452721 DOI: 10.1093/ptj/pzy095] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2017] [Accepted: 08/09/2018] [Indexed: 02/09/2023]
Abstract
Shared decision making (SDM) is a collaborative approach between clinicians and patients, where the best available evidence is integrated with patients' values and preferences for managing their health problems. Shared decision making may enhance patient-centered care and increase patients' satisfaction, engagement, adherence, and ability to self-manage their conditions. Despite its potential benefits, SDM is underutilized by physical therapists, and frequent mismatches between patients' and therapists' rehabilitation goals have been reported. Physical therapists can use evidence-based strategies, tools, and techniques to address these problems. This paper presents a model for SDM and explains its association with improved patient outcomes and relevance to situations commonly encountered in physical therapy. It describes freely available resources, including health literacy universal precautions, teach-back, motivational interviewing, decision aids, and patient-reported outcome measures that can help physical therapists integrate SDM into their clinical practices. This paper also explains SDM facilitators and barriers, suggests a theoretical framework to address them, and highlights the need for SDM promotion within physical therapy practice, education, administration, and research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cindy L Moore
- Holy Redeemer HomeCare, 160 E 9th Ave, Runnemede, NJ 08708 (USA)
| | - Sandra L Kaplan
- Department of Rehabilitation and Movement Sciences, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Newark, New Jersey
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Chou L, Ranger TA, Peiris W, Cicuttini FM, Urquhart DM, Briggs AM, Wluka AE. Patients' perceived needs for allied health, and complementary and alternative medicines for low back pain: A systematic scoping review. Health Expect 2018; 21:824-847. [PMID: 29983004 PMCID: PMC6186543 DOI: 10.1111/hex.12676] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/19/2018] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Allied health and complementary and alternative medicines (CAM) are therapeutic therapies commonly accessed by consumers to manage low back pain (LBP). We aimed to identify the literature regarding patients' perceived needs for physiotherapy, chiropractic therapy and CAM for the management of LBP. METHODS A systematic scoping review of MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL and PsycINFO (1990-2016) was conducted to identify studies examining patients' perceived needs for allied health and CAM for LBP. Data regarding study design and methodology were extracted. Areas of patients' perceived need for allied health and CAM were aggregated. RESULTS Forty-four studies from 2202 were included: 25 qualitative, 18 quantitative and 1 mixed-methods study. Three areas of need emerged: (i) physiotherapy was viewed as important, particularly when individually tailored. However, patients had concerns about adherence, adverse outcomes and correct exercise technique. (ii) Chiropractic therapy was perceived to be effective and needed by some patients, but others were concerned about adverse outcomes. (iii) An inconsistent need for CAM was identified with some patients perceiving a need, while others questioning the legitimacy and short-term duration of these therapies. CONCLUSIONS Our findings regarding patients' perceived needs for allied health and CAM for LBP may assist in informing development of more patient-centred guidelines and service models for LBP. Understanding patients' concerns regarding active-based physiotherapy, which is recommended in most guidelines, and issues surrounding chiropractic and CAM, which are generally not, may help inform management that better aligns patient's perceived needs with effective treatments, to improve outcomes for both patients and the health-care system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Louisa Chou
- Department of Epidemiology and Preventative MedicineSchool of Public Health and Preventative MedicineMonash UniversityMelbourneVicAustralia
| | - Tom A. Ranger
- Department of Epidemiology and Preventative MedicineSchool of Public Health and Preventative MedicineMonash UniversityMelbourneVicAustralia
| | - Waruna Peiris
- Department of Epidemiology and Preventative MedicineSchool of Public Health and Preventative MedicineMonash UniversityMelbourneVicAustralia
| | - Flavia M. Cicuttini
- Department of Epidemiology and Preventative MedicineSchool of Public Health and Preventative MedicineMonash UniversityMelbourneVicAustralia
| | - Donna M. Urquhart
- Department of Epidemiology and Preventative MedicineSchool of Public Health and Preventative MedicineMonash UniversityMelbourneVicAustralia
| | - Andrew M. Briggs
- School of Physiotherapy and Exercise ScienceCurtin UniversityPerthWAAustralia
- Move: Muscle, Bone & Joint HealthMelbourneVicAustralia
| | - Anita E. Wluka
- Department of Epidemiology and Preventative MedicineSchool of Public Health and Preventative MedicineMonash UniversityMelbourneVicAustralia
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Patients' perceived needs of health care providers for low back pain management: a systematic scoping review. Spine J 2018; 18:691-711. [PMID: 29373836 DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2018.01.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 51] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2017] [Revised: 12/19/2017] [Accepted: 01/10/2018] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND CONTEXT Optimal management of low back pain (LBP) involves patients' active participation in care, facilitated by positive interactions with their health care provider(s) (HCP). An understanding of patients' perceived needs regarding their HCP is, therefore, necessary to achieve such outcomes. Therefore, the aim of the present study is to review the existing literature regarding patients' perceived needs of HCP managing LBP. METHODS A systematic scoping review of publications in MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and PsycINFO (1990-2016) was performed. Descriptive data regarding study design and methodology were extracted, and risk of bias was assessed. Aggregates of patients' perceived needs of HCP for LBP were categorized. RESULTS Forty-three studies (30 qualitative, 12 quantitative, and 1 mixed methods) from 1,829 were relevant. Four areas of perceived need emerged: (1) there are several characteristics of HCP that patients desire, such as good communication and shared decision-making; (2) patients wanted HCP to provide information, including a cause of their LBP and legitimization of their symptoms; (3) patients' valued holistic, individualized care, and continuity of care; and (4) patients perceived long waiting times, difficulties with access to treatment, cost, and personal effort to be obstacles to care. CONCLUSIONS Patients with LBP want patient-centered care, to be actively involved, and they have identified characteristics of HCP that foster a good provider-patient relationship. They noted areas of dissatisfaction with HCP and perceived obstacles to care. Given limited health care resources, HCP and policy makers need to implement novel methods of health care delivery that address these issues to facilitate improved patient satisfaction and achieve better patient and health system outcomes.
Collapse
|
23
|
Mühlbacher AC, Kaczynski A, Zweifel P, Johnson FR. Experimental measurement of preferences in health and healthcare using best-worst scaling: an overview. HEALTH ECONOMICS REVIEW 2016; 6:2. [PMID: 26743636 PMCID: PMC4705077 DOI: 10.1186/s13561-015-0079-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 95] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/09/2015] [Accepted: 12/18/2015] [Indexed: 05/20/2023]
Abstract
Best-worst scaling (BWS), also known as maximum-difference scaling, is a multiattribute approach to measuring preferences. BWS aims at the analysis of preferences regarding a set of attributes, their levels or alternatives. It is a stated-preference method based on the assumption that respondents are capable of making judgments regarding the best and the worst (or the most and least important, respectively) out of three or more elements of a choice-set. As is true of discrete choice experiments (DCE) generally, BWS avoids the known weaknesses of rating and ranking scales while holding the promise of generating additional information by making respondents choose twice, namely the best as well as the worst criteria. A systematic literature review found 53 BWS applications in health and healthcare. This article expounds possibilities of application, the underlying theoretical concepts and the implementation of BWS in its three variants: 'object case', 'profile case', 'multiprofile case'. This paper contains a survey of BWS methods and revolves around study design, experimental design, and data analysis. Moreover the article discusses the strengths and weaknesses of the three types of BWS distinguished and offered an outlook. A companion paper focuses on special issues of theory and statistical inference confronting BWS in preference measurement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Axel C Mühlbacher
- IGM Institute for Health Economics and Health Care Management, Hochschule Neubrandenburg, Neubrandenburg, Germany.
| | - Anika Kaczynski
- IGM Institute for Health Economics and Health Care Management, Hochschule Neubrandenburg, Neubrandenburg, Germany.
| | - Peter Zweifel
- Department of Economics, University of Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.
| | - F Reed Johnson
- Center for Clinical and Genetic Economics, Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University, Durham, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Cheung KL, Wijnen BFM, Hollin IL, Janssen EM, Bridges JF, Evers SMAA, Hiligsmann M. Using Best-Worst Scaling to Investigate Preferences in Health Care. PHARMACOECONOMICS 2016; 34:1195-1209. [PMID: 27402349 PMCID: PMC5110583 DOI: 10.1007/s40273-016-0429-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 144] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/07/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Best-worst scaling (BWS) is becoming increasingly popular to elicit preferences in health care. However, little is known about current practice and trends in the use of BWS in health care. This study aimed to identify, review and critically appraise BWS in health care, and to identify trends over time in key aspects of BWS. METHODS A systematic review was conducted, using Medline (via Pubmed) and EMBASE to identify all English-language BWS studies published up until April 2016. Using a predefined extraction form, two reviewers independently selected articles and critically appraised the study quality, using the Purpose, Respondents, Explanation, Findings, Significance (PREFS) checklist. Trends over time periods (≤2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014 and 2015) were assessed further. RESULTS A total of 62 BWS studies were identified, of which 26 were BWS object case studies, 29 were BWS profile case studies and seven were BWS multi-profile case studies. About two thirds of the studies were performed in the last 2 years. Decreasing sample sizes and decreasing numbers of factors in BWS object case studies, as well as use of less complicated analytical methods, were observed in recent studies. The quality of the BWS studies was generally acceptable according to the PREFS checklist, except that most studies did not indicate whether the responders were similar to the non-responders. CONCLUSION Use of BWS object case and BWS profile case has drastically increased in health care, especially in the last 2 years. In contrast with previous discrete-choice experiment reviews, there is increasing use of less sophisticated analytical methods.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kei Long Cheung
- Department of Health Services Research, CAPHRI Research School for Public Health and Primary Care, Maastricht University, PO Box 616, 6200 MD, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
| | - Ben F M Wijnen
- Department of Health Services Research, CAPHRI Research School for Public Health and Primary Care, Maastricht University, PO Box 616, 6200 MD, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Department of Research and Development, Epilepsy Centre Kempenhaeghe, Heeze, The Netherlands
| | - Ilene L Hollin
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Ellen M Janssen
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - John F Bridges
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Silvia M A A Evers
- Department of Health Services Research, CAPHRI Research School for Public Health and Primary Care, Maastricht University, PO Box 616, 6200 MD, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Mickael Hiligsmann
- Department of Health Services Research, CAPHRI Research School for Public Health and Primary Care, Maastricht University, PO Box 616, 6200 MD, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Oerlemans AJM, Wollersheim H, van Sluisveld N, van der Hoeven JG, Dekkers WJM, Zegers M. Rationing in the intensive care unit in case of full bed occupancy: a survey among intensive care unit physicians. BMC Anesthesiol 2016; 16:25. [PMID: 27142161 PMCID: PMC4855768 DOI: 10.1186/s12871-016-0190-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2015] [Accepted: 04/27/2016] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Internationally, there is no consensus on how to best deal with admission requests in cases of full ICU bed occupancy. Knowledge about the degree of dissension and insight into the reasons for this dissension is lacking. Information about the opinion of ICU physicians can be used to improve decision-making regarding allocation of ICU resources. The aim of this study was to: Assess which factors play a role in the decision-making process regarding the admission of ICU patients; Assess the adherence to a Dutch guideline pertaining to rationing of ICU resources; Investigate factors influencing the adherence to this guideline. METHODS In March 2013, an online questionnaire was sent to all ICU physician members (n = 761, in 90 hospitals) of the Dutch Society for Intensive Care. RESULTS 166 physicians (21.8 %) working in 64 different Dutch hospitals (71.1 %) completed the questionnaire. Factors associated with a patient's physical condition and quality of life were generally considered most important in admission decisions. Scenario-based adherence to the Dutch guideline "Admission request in case of full ICU bed occupancy" was found to be low (adherence rate 50.0 %). There were two main reasons for this poor compliance: unfamiliarity with the guideline and disagreement with the fundamental approach underlying the guideline. CONCLUSIONS Dutch ICU physicians disagree about how to deal with admission requests in cases of full ICU bed occupancy. The results of this study contribute to the discussion about the fundamental principles regarding admission of ICU patients in case of full bed occupancy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anke J M Oerlemans
- Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, IQ healthcare, P.O. Box 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
| | - Hub Wollersheim
- Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, IQ healthcare, P.O. Box 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Nelleke van Sluisveld
- Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, IQ healthcare, P.O. Box 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Johannes G van der Hoeven
- Radboud University Medical Center, Department of Intensive Care Medicine, P.O. Box 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Wim J M Dekkers
- Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, IQ healthcare, P.O. Box 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Marieke Zegers
- Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, IQ healthcare, P.O. Box 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Hofstede SN, Marang-van de Mheen PJ, Vliet Vlieland TPM, van den Ende CHM, Nelissen RGHH, van Bodegom-Vos L. Barriers and Facilitators Associated with Non-Surgical Treatment Use for Osteoarthritis Patients in Orthopaedic Practice. PLoS One 2016; 11:e0147406. [PMID: 26799974 PMCID: PMC4723077 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0147406] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2015] [Accepted: 01/04/2016] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction International evidence-based guidelines for the management of patients with hip and knee osteoarthritis (OA) recommend to start with (a combination of) non-surgical treatments, and using surgical intervention only if a patient does not respond sufficiently to non-surgical treatment options. Despite these recommendations, there are strong indications that non-surgical treatments are not optimally used in orthopaedic practice. To improve the adoption of non-surgical treatments, more insight is needed into barriers and facilitators of these treatments. Therefore, this study assessed which barriers and facilitators are associated with the use and prescription of different non-surgical treatments before hip and knee OA in orthopaedic practice among patients and orthopaedic surgeons in the Netherlands. Materials and Methods We performed two internet-based surveys among 172 orthopaedic surgeons and 174 OA patients. Univariate association and multivariable regression techniques are used to identify barriers and facilitators associated with the use of non-surgical treatments. Results Most barriers and facilitators among patients were associated with the use of physical therapy, lifestyle advice and dietary therapy. Among orthopaedic surgeons, most were associated with prescription of acetaminophen, dietary therapy and physical therapy. Examples of barriers and facilitators among patients included “People in my environment had positive experiences with a surgery” (facilitator for education about OA), and “Advice of people in my environment to keep on moving” (facilitator for lifestyle and dietary advice). For orthopaedic surgeons, examples were “Lack of knowledge about guideline” (barrier for lifestyle advice), “Agreements/ deliberations with primary care” and “Easy communication with a dietician” (facilitators for dietary therapy). Also the belief in the efficacy of these treatments was associated with increased prescription. Conclusions Strategies to improve non-surgical treatment use in orthopaedic practice should be targeted at changing the beliefs of orthopedic surgeons, communication with other OA care providers and involving patient’s environment in OA treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefanie N. Hofstede
- Department of Medical Decision Making, Leiden University Medical Center, RC Leiden, The Netherlands
| | | | | | | | - Rob G. H. H. Nelissen
- Department of Orthopaedics, Leiden University Medical Center, RC Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Leti van Bodegom-Vos
- Department of Medical Decision Making, Leiden University Medical Center, RC Leiden, The Netherlands
- * E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Hofstede SN, Vliet Vlieland TPM, van den Ende CHM, Nelissen RGHH, Marang-van de Mheen PJ, van Bodegom-Vos L. Variation in use of non-surgical treatments among osteoarthritis patients in orthopaedic practice in the Netherlands. BMJ Open 2015; 5:e009117. [PMID: 26353874 PMCID: PMC4567674 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009117] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES National and international evidence-based guidelines for hip and knee osteoarthritis (OA) recommend to start with non-surgical treatments, followed by surgical intervention if a patient does not respond sufficiently to non-surgical treatments, but there are indications that these are not optimally used. The aim of this study was to assess the extent to which all recommended non-surgical treatments were used by patients with hip or knee OA who receive(d) a total hip or knee replacement, as reported by patients and orthopaedic surgeons. SETTING We performed two cross-sectional internet-based surveys among patients and orthopaedic surgeons throughout the Netherlands. PARTICIPANTS 195 OA patients either have undergone total knee arthroplasty or total hip arthroplasty no longer than 12 months ago or being on the waiting list for surgery with a confirmed date within 3 months and 482 orthopaedic surgeons were invited to participate. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES The use of recommended non-surgical treatments including education about OA/treatment options, lifestyle advice, dietary therapy, physical therapy, acetaminophen, NSAIDs and glucocorticoid injections. RESULTS 174 OA patients (93%) and 172 orthopaedic surgeons (36%) completed the surveys. Most recommended non-surgical treatments were given to the majority of patients (eg, 80% education about OA, 73% physical therapy, 72% acetaminophen, 80% NSAIDs). However, only 6% of patients and 10% of orthopaedic surgeons reported using a combination of all recommended treatments. Dietary therapy was used least frequently. Only 11% of overweight and 30% of obese participants reported having received dietary therapy and 28% of orthopaedic surgeons reported to prescribe dietary therapy to overweight patients. CONCLUSIONS While most recommended non-surgical treatments were used frequently as single therapy, the combination is used in only a small percentage of OA patients. Especially, use of dietary therapy may be improved to help patients manage their symptoms, and potentially delay the need for joint arthroplasty.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefanie N Hofstede
- Department of Medical Decision Making, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | | | | | - Rob G H H Nelissen
- Department of Orthopaedics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | | | - Leti van Bodegom-Vos
- Department of Medical Decision Making, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Rosenkrantz AB, Flagg ER. Survey-Based Assessment of Patients’ Understanding of Their Own Imaging Examinations. J Am Coll Radiol 2015; 12:549-55. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2015.02.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2014] [Revised: 02/03/2015] [Accepted: 02/05/2015] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
|
29
|
Durand MA, Barr PJ, Walsh T, Elwyn G. Incentivizing shared decision making in the USA – where are we now? Healthcare (Basel) 2015; 3:97-101. [DOI: 10.1016/j.hjdsi.2014.10.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2014] [Revised: 08/27/2014] [Accepted: 10/19/2014] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
|
30
|
Oostendorp LJM, Durand MA, Lloyd A, Elwyn G. Measuring organisational readiness for patient engagement (MORE): an international online Delphi consensus study. BMC Health Serv Res 2015; 15:61. [PMID: 25879457 PMCID: PMC4334597 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-015-0717-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2014] [Accepted: 01/28/2015] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Widespread implementation of patient engagement by organisations and clinical teams is not a reality yet. The aim of this study is to develop a measure of organisational readiness for patient engagement designed to monitor and facilitate a healthcare organisation’s willingness and ability to effectively implement patient engagement in healthcare. Methods The development of the MORE (Measuring Organisational Readiness for patient Engagement) scale was guided by Weiner’s theory of organisational readiness for change. Weiner postulates that an organisation’s readiness is determined by both the willingness and ability to implement the change (i.e. in this context: patient engagement). A first version of the scale was developed based on a literature search and evaluation of pre-existing tools. We invited multi-disciplinary stakeholders to participate in a two-round online Delphi survey. Respondents were asked to rate the importance of each proposed item, and to comment on the proposed domains and items. Second round participants received feedback from the first round and were asked to re-rate the importance of the revised, new and unchanged items, and to provide comments. Results The first version of the scale contained 51 items divided into three domains: (1) Respondents’ characteristics; (2) the organisation’s willingness to implement patient engagement; and (3) the organisation’s ability to implement patient engagement. 131 respondents from 16 countries (health care managers, policy makers, clinicians, patients and patient representatives, researchers, and other stakeholders) completed the first survey, and 72 of them also completed the second survey. During the Delphi process, 34 items were reworded, 8 new items were added, 5 items were removed, and 18 were combined. The scale’s instructions were revised. The final version of MORE totalled 38 items; 5 on stakeholders, 13 on an organisation’s willingness to implement, and 20 on an organisation’s ability to implement patient engagement in healthcare. Conclusions The Delphi technique was successfully used to refine the scale’s instructions, domains and items, using input from a broad range of international stakeholders, hoping that MORE can be applied in a variety of healthcare contexts worldwide. Further assessment is needed to determine the psychometric properties of the scale.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Linda J M Oostendorp
- Department of Psychology, Centre for Lifespan and Chronic Illness Research, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, UK.
| | - Marie-Anne Durand
- Department of Psychology, Centre for Lifespan and Chronic Illness Research, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, UK. .,The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, HB 7256, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, 03755, USA.
| | - Amy Lloyd
- Institute of Primary Care and Public Health, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Heath Park, Cardiff, UK.
| | - Glyn Elwyn
- The Dartmouth Center for Health Care Delivery Science, Dartmouth College, Hanover, USA.
| |
Collapse
|