A conceptual framework for evaluating impairments in myasthenia gravis

Fatigue and associated factors in myasthenia gravis: a nationwide registry study

Fatigue is commonly associated with myasthenia gravis (MG), but factors contributing to fatigue development in MG are incompletely understood. This nationwide cross-sectional registry study included 1464 patients diagnosed with autoimmune MG, recruited between February 2019 and April 2023. Frequency and severity of fatigue was assessed at study inclusion using the patient-reported Chalder Fatigue Questionnaire (CFQ). Frequency of fatigue was 59%. Fatigue severity strongly correlated with both patient-reported and physician-assessed MG outcome measures (MG-ADL, MG-QoL15, QMG and MGFA classes) and was associated with a history of myasthenic exacerbation and/or myasthenic crises and a delay in diagnosis of more than 1 year after symptom onset. Fatigue was more prevalent in women and coincided with symptoms of depression, anxiety, and sleep dissatisfaction. Differences in fatigue severity were observed between antibody (ab) subgroups, with highest fatigue severity in LRP4-ab-positive patients and lowest fatigue severity in AChR-ab-positive patients. Fatigue is a frequent and clinically highly relevant symptom of MG. Early diagnosis and prevention of MG crises may limit the long-term burden of fatigue in patients with MG.

Myasthenia Gravis Disease Burden and Its Impact on Satisfaction with Life: A Qualitative Survey of Patients' Perspectives in Japan

INTRODUCTION

Myasthenia gravis (MG) has a negative impact on patients' health-related quality of life; however, many clinicians do not fully understand their patients' lived experience of the disease. To understand the actual conditions of patients with MG and clarify the problems they perceive, we conducted a survey to evaluate the effects of the disease on patients' daily life and work.

METHODS

A questionnaire-based, qualitative, cross-sectional, non-interventional survey was conducted in Japan between April and May 2022 in patients with MG who were receiving regular outpatient treatment. The questionnaire included items regarding the patients' disease characteristics and experience, satisfaction with life, current treatment status, and treatment satisfaction.

RESULTS

In total, 452 patients were included in the survey population (66.6% aged ≥ 60 years; 64.6% with MG disease duration ≥ 10 years; 76.6% acetylcholine receptor [AChR] autoantibody positive). The symptoms of MG had a significant impact on the patients' daily lives, with the most common symptoms being fatigability (74.8%), ptosis (59.7%), diplopia (54.2%), and weakness in the arms and/or legs (50.9%). Patients commonly identified exercise (73.7%), work 68.0%), hobbies (60.4%), travel (60.0%), and socializing with friends (59.7%) as being difficult to perform, with approximately 50% of patients reporting that hospitalization sometimes interfered with their ability to work. In total, 27.2% of patients were dissatisfied with life, with the highest rates of dissatisfaction among patients who were either positive for muscle-specific kinase (MuSK) autoantibodies or seronegative for both AChR and MuSK autoantibodies.

CONCLUSION

In Japanese patients with MG, over 25% are dissatisfied with life, indicating several unmet needs in this population.

Expert consensus recommendations for improving and standardising the assessment of patients with generalised myasthenia gravis

BACKGROUND

Regular and consistent disease assessment could provide a clearer picture of burden in generalised myasthenia gravis (gMG) and improve patient care; however, the use of assessment tools in practice lacks standardisation. This modified Delphi approach was taken to review current evidence on assessment tool use in gMG and develop expert-derived consensus recommendations for good practice.

METHODS

A European expert panel of 15 experienced gMG neurologists contributed to development of this consensus, four of whom formed a lead Sub-committee. The PICO (Population, Intervention, Control, Outcomes) framework was used to define six clinical questions on gMG assessment tools, a systematic literature review was conducted, and evidence-based statements were developed. According to a modified Delphi voting process, consensus was reached when ≥70% of the experts rated agreement with a statement as ≥8 on a scale of 1-10.

RESULTS

Eighteen expert- and evidence-based consensus statements based on six themes were developed. Key recommendations include: consistent use of the Myasthenia Gravis Activities of Daily Living score (MG-ADL) across clinical settings, followed by a simple question (e.g., Patient Acceptable Symptom State [PASS]) or scale to determine patient satisfaction in clinical practice; use of a Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis [QMG] or quality of life [QoL] assessment when the MG-ADL indicates disease worsening; and consideration of symptom state to determine the timing and frequency of recommended assessments. Expert panel consensus was reached on all 18 statements after two voting rounds.

CONCLUSIONS

This process provided evidence- and expert consensus-based recommendations for the use of objective and subjective assessment tools across gMG research and care to improve management and outcomes for patients.

Experience of Daily Life with Generalized Myasthenia Gravis: A Qualitative Investigation and Assessment of Instrument Content Validity

INTRODUCTION

Generalized myasthenia gravis (gMG) is a rare autoimmune disease. Symptoms of gMG are diverse, and understanding of their impact on patients is limited. This qualitative study aimed to provide an in-depth exploration of patients' daily experiences of gMG.

METHODS

Published qualitative studies were reviewed to identify the most important signs, symptoms, and functional impacts related to the patient experience in gMG. Semi-structured hybrid concept elicitation interviews (allowing spontaneous generation of disease concepts) and cognitive debriefing interviews (assessing the validity of existing disease assessments) were conducted with clinicians and adult patients with gMG. Signs, symptoms, and impacts were reviewed to understand which were most salient (i.e., reported by at least 50% of patients, with disturbance rating 5 or higher [10-point numeric scale]); concept saturation was also assessed. The disease conceptual model was updated. Existing clinical outcomes assessments (COAs) that capture how patients feel, function, and survive were assessed.

RESULTS

Interviews with patients (n = 24) identified seven new signs and symptoms and 37 new impacts compared with the literature. Concept saturation was reached. Signs and symptoms identified by patients as most important (salient) were shortness of breath, general fatigue, muscle weakness of arms, legs, and neck, dysphonia, dysarthria, trouble swallowing liquids, choking, and heat sensitivity. Patient-identified salient impacts were work life, depression, difficulty walking, grooming hair, showering, and brushing teeth, eating, personal relationships, family life, and participating in social activities. Clinicians considered ocular, respiratory, swallowing, speech/talking, and extremity function as key clinical manifestations of gMG. Patients and clinicians found clinical outcome assessments (COAs) to be conceptually relevant and comprehensive.

CONCLUSION

This research provides a holistic understanding of gMG signs, symptoms, and impacts experienced by patients, as observed by patients and clinicians. The conceptual model of gMG highlights the range of signs, symptoms, and impacts that adult patients with gMG experience in their everyday lives, emphasizing the humanistic impact and unmet needs.

Understanding the Symptom Burden and Impact of Myasthenia Gravis from the Patient's Perspective: A Qualitative Study

INTRODUCTION

Patients with generalized myasthenia gravis (gMG) experience functional impairment due to MG symptoms. This study aimed to assess, from the patient perspective, the symptoms, impacts, and treatment goals of individuals diagnosed with gMG.

METHODS

Semi-structured, in-depth concept-elicitation interviews were conducted with 28 individuals diagnosed with gMG in the United States.

RESULTS

Participants reported gMG symptoms that affected many body regions and functions, with an average of 16 symptoms per participant. The most frequently reported symptoms were eyelid drooping (93%), physical fatigue (89%), symptoms affecting the legs (82%), difficulty breathing (82%), and difficulty holding head up (82%). Nearly all participants (96%) reported fluctuations in symptoms and severity. Participants' most bothersome symptoms were blurry/double vision (43%), breathing difficulties (36%), all-over fatigue (36%), and swallowing problems (29%). Impacts on physical functioning included an inability to participate in hobbies/sports, need for increased planning, and difficulties performing activities of daily living. All participants reported emotional impacts and impacts on their work and finances. Their treatment goals included reduced fatigue and weakness, improved symptom stability, and minimization of the impact of symptoms, in particular the emotional impact.

CONCLUSIONS

The fluctuating and unpredictable nature of gMG symptoms was found to have a substantial impact on patients' emotional, social, and economic well-being. Participants' goals for symptom management suggest that greater focus is needed to help them quickly resume a normal lifestyle by achieving symptom stability. Impacts of fluctuating and unpredictable symptoms are difficult to measure, but it is important to consider symptom fluctuation as well as ongoing symptomatology when making treatment decisions, and to recognize the impact of uncontrolled symptoms on patients, their partners/caregivers, and family/friends. These factors are often not reflected in burden/cost-of-illness studies.

Development of the Myasthenia Gravis (MG) Symptoms PRO: a case study of a patient-centred outcome measure in rare disease

BACKGROUND

Myasthenia gravis (MG) is a chronic autoimmune neuromuscular disease, characterised by fluctuating muscle weakness which makes it challenging to assess symptom severity. Mixed methods psychometrics (MMP), which combines evidence from qualitative research and modern psychometrics, is a versatile approach to the development of patient-centred outcome measures (PCOM) in the context of rare disease. Our objective was to develop the MG Symptom patient-reported outcome (PRO) to assess key aspects of MG severity from the patient perspective.

METHODS

We used MMP to develop a novel PRO instrument in a multi-step process. An initial conceptual model for MG patient experience was developed and expanded based on preliminary literature review and two waves of concept elicitation interviews with people with MG (Step 1). Based on this, the novel PRO instrument, the MG Symptoms PRO, was drafted. The draft instrument was refined by combining qualitative and quantitative data collected in a Phase 2 clinical study (Step 2).

RESULTS

Findings from the literature review and concept elicitation interviews (n = 96) indicated that patient experience in MG includes proximal muscle weakness symptoms related to several body parts, along with muscle weakness fatigability and general fatigue. Then, a set of 42 items across five scales (ocular-, bulbar-, and respiratory muscle weakness, physical fatigue, and muscle weakness fatigability) was developed. Qualitative evidence endorsed its relevance, clarity, and ease of completion; quantitative analysis with Rasch measurement theory methods demonstrated strong measurement properties, including good targeting and high reliability. Classical test theory analyses showed adequate reliability of the instrument and mild to moderate correlations with other widely used MG-specific outcome measures.

CONCLUSIONS

The MG Symptoms PRO has potential to be used both to measure treatment benefit in clinical trials and monitor symptom severity in clinical practice. Its component scales were purposefully designed to stand alone, enhancing interpretability of scores given the heterogeneity of MG, and enabling modular use. Compared with existing MG PROs, it contains more detailed assessments of muscle weakness and muscle weakness fatigability symptoms, which are of key importance to people with MG. The MMP approach used may serve as a case study for developing PCOMs across rare disease indications.

The Lived Experience of Myasthenia Gravis: A Patient-Led Analysis

Introduction

A greater understanding of the reality of living with myasthenia gravis (MG) may improve management and outcomes for patients. However, there is little published data on the patient perspective of how MG impacts life. Our objective was to reveal the lived experience of MG from the patient perspective.

Methods

This analysis was led by an international Patient Council comprising nine individuals living with MG who serve as local/national patient advocates in seven countries (Europe and the United States). Insights into the lived experience of MG were consolidated from three sources (a qualitative research study of 54 people with MG or their carers from seven countries; a previous Patient Council meeting [September 2019]; and a literature review). Insights were prioritised by the Patient Council, discussed during a virtual workshop (August 2020) and articulated in a series of statements organised into domains. Overarching themes that describe the lived experience of MG were identified by the patient authors.

Results

From 114 patient insights and supporting quotes, the Patient Council defined 44 summary statements organised into nine domains. Five overarching themes were identified that describe the lived experience of MG. These themes include living with fluctuating and unpredictable symptoms; a constant state of adaptation, continual assessment and trade-offs in all aspects of life; treatment inertia, often resulting in under-treatment; a sense of disconnect with healthcare professionals; and feelings of anxiety, frustration, guilt, anger, loneliness and depression.

Conclusion

This patient-driven analysis enriches our understanding of the reality of living with MG from the patient perspective.

Five-Month Trial of Whole-Food Plant-Based Diet in a Patient With Coexisting Myasthenia Gravis and Lambert-Eaton Myasthenic Syndrome

Introduction: Nutritional intervention, such as a whole-food plant-based (WFPB) diet, is suggested to improve symptoms of autoimmune disorders. Its effects on neuromuscular junction (NMJ) diseases are less known. Case Description: A 56-year-old female with a combined myasthenia gravis and Lambert-Eaton myasthenic syndrome presented with persistent musculoskeletal weakness and pain, fatigue, and diminished concentration. Methods: A WFPB diet was implemented for 5 months in this case study. Functionality, biometrics, and quality of life were assessed at regular intervals via blood work, vital signs, and patient surveys. Results: After 10 weeks, 2 medications were de-prescribed due to improvement in blood glucose levels and blood pressure readings. Neuromuscular symptoms lessened as measured by the Myasthenia Gravis Illness Index. Weight loss of 18.7 pounds was achieved. No deterioration in physical activity was reported throughout the 5-month trial of WFPB diet. Discussion: Our results have implications that an individualized dietary strategy may be considered as one component of management of NMJ diseases. The effects of WFPB diet on NMJ diseases remain inconclusive.

Possible implications of dysregulated nicotinic acetylcholine receptor diffusion and nanocluster formation in myasthenia gravis

Myasthenia gravis is a rare and invalidating disease affecting the neuromuscular junction of voluntary muscles. The classical form of this autoimmune disease is characterized by the presence of antibodies against the most abundant protein in the neuromuscular junction, the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor. Other variants of the disease involve autoimmune attack of non-receptor scaffolding proteins or enzymes essential for building or maintaining the integrity of this peripheral synapse. This review summarizes the participation of the above proteins in building the neuromuscular junction and the destruction of this cholinergic synapse by autoimmune aggression in myasthenia gravis. The review also covers the application of a powerful biophysical technique, superresolution optical microscopy, to image the nicotinic receptor in live cells and follow its motional dynamics. The hypothesis is entertained that anomalous nanocluster formation by antibody crosslinking may lead to accelerated endocytic internalization and elevated turnover of the receptor, as observed in myasthenia gravis.

Outcome Measures in Clinical Trials of Patients With Myasthenia Gravis

Myasthenia gravis (MG) is a heterogeneous disorder whose clinical presentation ranges from mild ocular deficits to severe widespread weakness. This variance poses a challenge when quantifying clinical deficits. Deficits and symptoms are quantified using standardized clinical scales and questionnaires which are often used as outcome measures. The past decades have seen the development of several validated outcome measures in MG, which are used in clinical trials to obtain regulatory approval. In recent years, emphasis has moved from objective assessments to patient-reported outcomes. Despite a growing body of literature on the validity of the MG-specific outcome measures, several unresolved factors remain. As several novel therapeutics are currently in clinical development, knowledge about capabilities and limitations of outcome measures is needed. In the present paper, we describe the most widely used clinical classifications and scales in MG. We highlight the choice of outcome measures in published and ongoing trials, and we denote whether trial efficacy was reached on these outcomes. We discuss advantages and limitations of the individual scales, and discuss some of the unresolved factors relating to outcome assessments in MG.

Prospective study of stress, depression and personality in myasthenia gravis relapses

Background

Psychopathology and personality traits may influence the course of autoimmune disorders. With this prospective longitudinal cohort study, we aimed to assess personality, stress and depression in myasthenia patients who relapse and those who remain stable or improve (non-relapsers).

Method

We collected data from 155 consecutive adult patients with confirmed MG attending the Neuromuscular Clinic, Toronto General Hospital, between March 2017 and July 2018, for this study. Patients were assessed at baseline and 6 months, or at the time of MG relapse. At both visits, the patients were assessed clinically and were asked to complete self-administered questionnaires for disease severity, chronic stress and depression. Personality type was assessed at baseline only. Relapsing patients were defined as those patients with MGII score increasing by more than 5.5 points from visit 1 to visit 2.

Results

Relapsers had higher baseline scores for depression (p = 0.01) and the change in disease severity correlated with the change in depression score (r = 0.2534, p = 0.0015, 95% CI: 0.098 0.3961). Higher levels of stress at baseline and neuroticism predicted higher relapse rates (p = 0.01 and p < .0001, respectively). In the linear regression model, with change of the MGII score as the dependent variable, change in depression scores (p = 0.0004) and age (p = 0.03) predicted change in disease severity.

Conclusions

Since emotional factors and personality type may influence MG, attention to these factors might improve care in MG patients.

Measuring Clinical Treatment Response in Myasthenia Gravis

In this article we provide an overview of health-related outcome measurement-to better understand what different outcomes used in myasthenia actually measure-and to provide some guidance when choosing measures based on the clinical context and question. In myasthenia, the most commonly used outcome measures are aimed at assessing the signs and symptoms. In this review, we provide a summary of the most commonly used outcome measures. We discuss instruments that gauge disease overall health impact, such as on disability and quality of life. Finally, we discuss other relevant outcomes such as steroid-sparing effects and the role of surrogate markers.

EQ-5D-5L and SF-6D health utility index scores in patients with myasthenia gravis

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Health utilities are a preference-based method of valuing health states that are used in healthcare research, such as economic evaluations. There are limited health utility valuation data for patients with myasthenia gravis (MG). The aim of the study was to describe health utilities for patients with MG and different health states, using the EQ-5D-5L and SF-6D utility instruments, and to explore clinical and demographic determinants of utilities in this population.

METHODS

Patients completed the EQ-5D-5L and SF-6D. In addition, patients were assessed with the Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America classification, Myasthenia Gravis Impairment Index and MG-QOL15 as disease-specific measures, and the Neuro-QoL Fatigue scale. We calculated mean utilities for each Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America severity class. We built regression models for the EQ-5D-5L and SF-6D to determine the clinical and demographic factors that determine patients' valuation of their health state.

RESULTS

Among 254 patients, mean EQ-5D-5L health utilities were as follows: Remission, 0.94 ± 0.03; Minimal Manifestations, 0.92 ± 0.04; Class I, 0.89 ± 0.06; Class II, 0.78 ± 0.16; Class III, 0.58 ± 0.24 and Class IV, 0.61 ± 0.22. Mean SF-6D health utilities were as follows: Remission, 0.83 ± 0.07; Minimal Manifestations, 0.86 ± 0.14; Class I, 0.82 ± 0.14; Class II, 0.67 ± 0.12; Class III, 0.56 ± 0.11 and Class IV, 0.50 ± 0.10. The limb/axial scores were more highly correlated to health utilities than ocular or bulbar scores.

CONCLUSIONS

We present estimates of health utilities for patients with MG that can be used in cost-utility and decision analyses. Limb/axial symptoms had a higher impact on health utilities than ocular or bulbar symptoms, which might reflect the impact of mobility on health valuation.

Fatigue is a relevant outcome in patients with myasthenia gravis

INTRODUCTION

Patients with myasthenia gravis often experience fatigue, but its effect on quality of life (QoL) is underestimated, and fatigue is rarely measured in clinical trials.

METHODS

Two hundred fifty-seven myasthenic patients completed the Neuro-QoL-Fatigue and measures of disease severity and QoL. We studied the relationship between fatigue and clinical and demographic variables. Finally, we studied the responsiveness of the Neuro-QoL-Fatigue in 95 patients receiving treatments for myasthenia and estimated the minimal important difference (MID).

RESULTS

Fatigue correlated with greater disease severity (r = 0.52-0.69, P < 0.0001) and worse QoL (r = 0.65-0.75, P < 0.0001). Patients in remission, with minimal manifestations, and pure ocular symptoms reported minimal fatigue. Regression modeling showed that, in addition to its relationship with disease severity, fatigue was worse in females, patients with generalized disease, and those with anxiety/depression. Fatigue improved after immunomodulation (P < 0.0001), and the MID was 5.3 points.

DISCUSSION

Fatigue in myasthenia correlates with disease severity, affects QoL, and can improve after treatment. Muscle Nerve 58: 197-203, 2018.

What's in the Literature?

In this edition of this column, we review new studies concerning the pathophysiology, treatment, and outcomes of patients with necrotizing myopathy, genetic testing in congenital myopathies, and limb girdle muscular dystrophies, and the incidence of polyneuropathy in the myotonic dystrophies. Various studies in myasthenia gravis, including those concerning antibody testing, clinical features, and quality of life are also reviewed as are recent findings in congenital myasthenic syndromes. Finally, 2 studies concerning polyneuropathy are discussed, including one on the association of polyneuropathy in patients with the metabolic syndrome and one on laboratory testing in patients with otherwise idiopathic small fiber polyneuropathy.

Fatigue in myasthenia gravis: risk factors and impact on quality of life

OBJECTIVES

Emerging evidence suggests that fatigue in myasthenia gravis (MG) is a relevant problem that negatively impacts activities of daily living (ADL). The relationship between fatigue and quality of life (QoL) has never been systematically explored in MG patients. The study aimed to assess the prevalence of fatigue and its relation to ADL and QoL as well as to identify factors associated with fatigue in MG.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This was a cross-sectional observational study in patients with confirmed diagnosis of MG independent of disease severity. Prevalence of fatigue was assessed using the Chalder Fatigue Scale (CFQ). Impact of fatigue on ADL and QoL was assessed by the MG activities of daily living profile (MG-ADL) and the MG-specific quality-of-life instrument (MG-QoL), respectively. Association of fatigue with sociodemographics, clinical characteristics of MG, and comorbidities including mood and anxiety disorders as well as sleep disorders was investigated using multivariable logistic regression analyses.

RESULTS

Overall, 200 MG patients were included. The observed rate of fatigue was 56.1%, of those 70.4% fulfilled the criteria of chronic fatigue (CF) with a duration of ≥6 months. Relevant fatigue was strongly associated to ADL and QoL. Factors associated with relevant fatigue were disease severity and depressive state. Furthermore, positive muscle-specific tyrosine kinase (MuSK) antibody status showed a strong association with relevant fatigue.

CONCLUSIONS

MG patients have a high prevalence of fatigue which negatively impacts ADL and QoL. MG-specific clinical characteristics are related to fatigue and might help to identify MG patients at risk for fatigue.

Development and validation of the Myasthenia Gravis Impairment Index

Objective:

We aimed to develop a measure of myasthenia gravis impairment using a previously developed framework and to evaluate reliability and validity, specifically face, content, and construct validity.

Methods:

The first draft of the Myasthenia Gravis Impairment Index (MGII) included examination items from available measures enriched with newly developed, patient-reported items, modified after patient input. International neuromuscular specialists evaluated face and content validity via an e-mail survey. Test–retest reliability was assessed in stable patients at a 3-week interval and interrater reliability was evaluated in the same day. Construct validity was assessed through correlations between the MGII and other measures and by comparing scores in different patient groups.

Results:

The first draft was assessed by 18 patients, and 72 specialists answered the survey. The second draft had 7 examination and 22 patient-reported items. Field testing included 200 patients, with 54 patients completing the reliability studies. Test–retest reliability of the total score was good (intraclass correlation coefficient 0.92; 95% confidence interval 0.79–0.94), as was interrater reliability of the examination component (intraclass correlation coefficient 0.81; 95% confidence interval 0.79–0.94). The MGII correlated well with comparison measures, with higher correlations with the MG–activities of daily living (r = 0.91) and MG-specific quality of life 15-item scale (r = 0.78). When assessing different patient groups, the scores followed expected patterns.

Conclusions:

The MGII was developed using a patient-centered framework of myasthenia-related impairments and incorporating patient input throughout the development process. It is reliable in an outpatient setting and has demonstrated construct validity. Responsiveness studies are under way.

Intravenous immunoglobulin as treatment for myasthenia gravis: current evidence and outcomes

We examined the current evidence for the efficacy of IV immunoglobulin (IVIG) in myasthenia gravis (MG) and the outcomes used to demonstrate this efficacy. There is class 1 evidence for the use of short-term IVIG in MG patients worsening MG and also good evidence for IVIG use in myasthenic crisis. For long-term maintenance therapy, controlled studies are lacking and the evidence is limited to class III retrospective studies. The clinical scales, serological, electrophysiological, and patient-reported quality of life outcomes with IVIG have been assessed. At this time, the quantitative myasthenia gravis score, a functional scale, remains the preferable outcome measure as it has demonstrated responsiveness in the clinical trial setting, but a scale incorporating patient-reported outcomes and the patients complaint of fatigue is likely to be preferable. The MG-composite is such a scale, but has measurement limitations that may reduce its sensitivity. Across trials, IVIG has generally been well tolerated.