1
|
Petrelli F, Arru M, Colombo S, Cavallone M, Cribiu' FM, Villardita V, Floris P, Digiesi L, Severgnini G, Moraes MT, Conti B, Celotti A, Viti M, Sozzi A. BRAF mutations and survival with surgery for colorectal liver metastases: A systematic review and meta-analysis. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY 2024; 50:108306. [PMID: 38603866 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2024.108306] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2024] [Revised: 03/13/2024] [Accepted: 03/23/2024] [Indexed: 04/13/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Mutations in the BRAF gene (BRAFmut) are associated with an unfavorable prognosis in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC). The aim of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the prognosis of colorectal cancer (CRC) patients with liver metastases and the potential benefits of liver resection in patients with BRAFmut CRC. MATERIAL AND METHODS A systematic search of PubMed, Cochrane Central Controlled Trials, and Embase databases was conducted on May 31, 2023. The inclusion criteria were as follows:1) reporting of outcomes in patients with BRAFmut CRC who underwent surgery for liver metastases and/or comparison of outcomes between those who underwent and those who did not undergo resection; 2) reporting of survival information as hazard ratios (HR); and 3) publication in English. RESULTS 34 studies were included. Median follow up was 48 months for prognostic BRAF status meta-analysis. BRAFmut status showed a significantly increased risk of mortality (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.56, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.04-3.22; P < 0.01) and relapse (HR = 1.97, 95% CI 1.44-2.71; P < 0.01). Resection of liver metastases was associated with a survival benefit (median follow up 46 months). The HR for survival was 0.44 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.33-0.59; P < 0.01) in favor of surgery. CONCLUSIONS and Relevance: Our analysis indeed confirms that BRAF mutation is associated with poor survival outcomes after liver resection of CRC metastases. However, upon quantitatively assessing the survival benefit of surgical intervention in patients with BRAF-mutated CRC liver metastases, we identified a significant 56% reduction in the risk of death.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Marcella Arru
- Surgery Unit, ASST Bergamo Ovest, Treviglio, BG, Italy
| | - Silvia Colombo
- Hepatology Unit, ASST Bergamo Ovest, Treviglio, BG, Italy
| | | | | | | | - Paola Floris
- Surgery Unit, ASST Bergamo Ovest, Treviglio, BG, Italy
| | | | | | | | - Barbara Conti
- Surgery Unit, ASST Bergamo Ovest, Treviglio, BG, Italy
| | | | - Matteo Viti
- Surgery Unit, ASST Bergamo Ovest, Treviglio, BG, Italy
| | - Andrea Sozzi
- Surgery Unit, ASST Bergamo Ovest, Treviglio, BG, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastases: Genomics and Biomarkers with Focus on Local Therapies. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:cancers15061679. [PMID: 36980565 PMCID: PMC10046329 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15061679] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2023] [Revised: 02/23/2023] [Accepted: 03/03/2023] [Indexed: 03/11/2023] Open
Abstract
Molecular cancer biomarkers help personalize treatment, predict oncologic outcomes, and identify patients who can benefit from specific targeted therapies. Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third-most common cancer, with the liver being the most frequent visceral metastatic site. KRAS, NRAS, BRAF V600E Mutations, DNA Mismatch Repair Deficiency/Microsatellite Instability Status, HER2 Amplification, and NTRK Fusions are NCCN approved and actionable molecular biomarkers for colorectal cancer. Additional biomarkers are also described and can be helpful in different image-guided hepatic directed therapies specifically for CRLM. For example, tumors maintaining the Ki-67 proliferation marker after thermal ablation was shown to be particularly resilient to ablation. Ablation margin was also shown to be an important factor in predicting local recurrence, with a ≥10 mm minimal ablation margin being required to attain local tumor control, especially for patients with mutant KRAS CRLM.
Collapse
|
3
|
Ma WJ, Chen Y, Peng JH, Tang C, Zhang L, Liu M, Hu S, Xu H, Tan H, Gu Y, Pan ZZ, Chen G, Zhou ZG, Zhang RX. Stage IV colon cancer patients without DENND2D expression benefit more from neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Cell Death Dis 2022; 13:439. [PMID: 35523764 PMCID: PMC9076603 DOI: 10.1038/s41419-022-04885-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2021] [Revised: 04/21/2022] [Accepted: 04/25/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
According to the EPOC study, chemotherapy could improve 5-year disease-free survival of stage IV colon cancer patients by 8.1%. However, more molecular biomarkers are required to identify patients who need neoadjuvant chemotherapy. DENND2D expression was evaluated by immunohistochemistry in 181 stage IV colon cancer patients. The prognosis was better for patients with DENND2D expression than patients without DENND2D expression (5-year overall survival [OS]: 42% vs. 12%, p = 0.038; 5-year disease-free survival: 20% vs. 10%, p = 0.001). Subgroup analysis of the DENND2D-negative group showed that patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy achieved longer OS than patients without neoadjuvant chemotherapy (RR = 0.179; 95% CI = 0.054-0.598; p = 0.003). DENND2D suppressed CRC proliferation in vitro and in vivo. Downregulation of DENND2D also promoted metastasis to distant organs in vivo. Mechanistically, DENND2D suppressed the MAPK pathway in CRC. Colon cancer patients who were DENND2D negative always showed a worse prognosis and were more likely to benefit from neoadjuvant chemotherapy. DENND2D may be a new prognostic factor and a predictor of the need for neoadjuvant chemotherapy in stage IV colon cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wen-juan Ma
- grid.12981.330000 0001 2360 039XState Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangzhou, 510060 Guangdong Province People’s Republic of China ,grid.488530.20000 0004 1803 6191Collaborative Innovation Center of Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, 510060 Guangdong Province People’s Republic of China ,grid.488530.20000 0004 1803 6191Intensive Care Unit Department, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Centre, Guangzhou, 510060 Guangdong Province People’s Republic of China
| | - Yukun Chen
- grid.12981.330000 0001 2360 039XZhongshan School of Medicine, Sun Yat-Sen University, No. 74, Zhongshan Rd. 2, Guangzhou, 510080 Guangdong Province People’s Republic of China
| | - Jian-hong Peng
- grid.12981.330000 0001 2360 039XState Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangzhou, 510060 Guangdong Province People’s Republic of China ,grid.488530.20000 0004 1803 6191Collaborative Innovation Center of Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, 510060 Guangdong Province People’s Republic of China ,grid.488530.20000 0004 1803 6191Department of Colorectal Surgery, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Centre, Guangzhou, 510060 Guangdong Province People’s Republic of China
| | - Chaoming Tang
- grid.410737.60000 0000 8653 1072The Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Qingyuan People’s Hospital, QingYuan, Guangdong Province People’s Republic of China
| | - Ling Zhang
- grid.12981.330000 0001 2360 039XState Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangzhou, 510060 Guangdong Province People’s Republic of China ,grid.488530.20000 0004 1803 6191Collaborative Innovation Center of Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, 510060 Guangdong Province People’s Republic of China ,grid.488530.20000 0004 1803 6191Department of Radiology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province People’s Republic of China
| | - Min Liu
- grid.12981.330000 0001 2360 039XState Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangzhou, 510060 Guangdong Province People’s Republic of China ,grid.488530.20000 0004 1803 6191Collaborative Innovation Center of Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, 510060 Guangdong Province People’s Republic of China ,grid.488530.20000 0004 1803 6191Department of Ultrasound, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province People’s Republic of China
| | - Shanshan Hu
- grid.430387.b0000 0004 1936 8796Department of Statistics, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ 08854 USA
| | - Haineng Xu
- grid.25879.310000 0004 1936 8972Ovarian Cancer Research Center, Division of Gynecology Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
| | - Hua Tan
- grid.267308.80000 0000 9206 2401School of Biomedical Informatics, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX 77030 USA
| | - Yangkui Gu
- grid.488530.20000 0004 1803 6191Intervention Department, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province People’s Republic of China
| | - Zhi-zhong Pan
- grid.12981.330000 0001 2360 039XState Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangzhou, 510060 Guangdong Province People’s Republic of China ,grid.488530.20000 0004 1803 6191Collaborative Innovation Center of Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, 510060 Guangdong Province People’s Republic of China ,grid.488530.20000 0004 1803 6191Department of Colorectal Surgery, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Centre, Guangzhou, 510060 Guangdong Province People’s Republic of China
| | - Gong Chen
- grid.12981.330000 0001 2360 039XState Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangzhou, 510060 Guangdong Province People’s Republic of China ,grid.488530.20000 0004 1803 6191Collaborative Innovation Center of Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, 510060 Guangdong Province People’s Republic of China ,grid.488530.20000 0004 1803 6191Department of Colorectal Surgery, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Centre, Guangzhou, 510060 Guangdong Province People’s Republic of China
| | - Zhong-guo Zhou
- grid.12981.330000 0001 2360 039XState Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangzhou, 510060 Guangdong Province People’s Republic of China ,grid.488530.20000 0004 1803 6191Collaborative Innovation Center of Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, 510060 Guangdong Province People’s Republic of China ,grid.488530.20000 0004 1803 6191Department of Hepatobiliary Oncology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province People’s Republic of China
| | - Rong-xin Zhang
- grid.12981.330000 0001 2360 039XState Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangzhou, 510060 Guangdong Province People’s Republic of China ,grid.488530.20000 0004 1803 6191Collaborative Innovation Center of Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, 510060 Guangdong Province People’s Republic of China ,grid.488530.20000 0004 1803 6191Department of Colorectal Surgery, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Centre, Guangzhou, 510060 Guangdong Province People’s Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Papaconstantinou D, Hewitt DB, Brown ZJ, Schizas D, Tsilimigras DI, Pawlik TM. Patient stratification in hepatocellular carcinoma: impact on choice of therapy. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 2022; 22:297-306. [PMID: 35157530 DOI: 10.1080/14737140.2022.2041415] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION HCC comprises around 60 to 80% of all primary liver cancers and exhibits wide geographical variability. Appropriate treatment allocation needs to include both patient and tumor characteristics. AREAS COVERED Current HCC classification systems to guide therapy are either liver function-centric and evaluate physiologic liver function to guide therapy or prognostic stratification classification systems broadly based on tumor morphologic parameters, patient performance status, and liver reserve assessment. This review focuses on different classification systems for HCC, their strengths, and weaknesses as well as the use of artificial intelligence in improving prognostication in HCC. EXPERT OPINION Future HCC classification systems will need to incorporate clinic-pathologic data from a multitude of sources and emerging therapies to develop patient-specific treatment plans targeting a patient's unique tumor profile.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dimitrios Papaconstantinou
- Third Department of Surgery, Attikon University Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Medical School, Greece
| | - D Brock Hewitt
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Zachary J Brown
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Dimitrios Schizas
- First Department of Surgery, Laikon General Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Medical School, Greece
| | - Diamantis I Tsilimigras
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Timothy M Pawlik
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, Ohio
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Takeda Y, Mise Y, Takahashi Y, Ito H, Inoue Y, Yoshioka R, Ono Y, Saiura A. Limited Prognostic Value of KRAS in Patients Undergoing Hepatectomy for Colorectal Liver Metastases. Ann Surg Oncol 2021; 29:2383-2391. [PMID: 34851437 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-021-11015-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2021] [Accepted: 10/11/2021] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND RAS mutation status is considered a powerful prognostic factor in patients undergoing hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases (CLM). However, whether its prognostic power is robust regardless of administration of preoperative chemotherapy or tumor burden remains unclear. METHODS Consecutive patients who underwent initial hepatectomy for CLM from April 2010 through March 2017 in two hospitals were included. The prognostic value of KRAS was compared based on whether patients received preoperative chemotherapy and their tumor burden score (TBS). RESULTS We included 409 patients (median follow-up 38 months). In the preoperative chemotherapy group, patients with mutant KRAS (mt-KRAS) CLM had poorer overall survival (OS) than those with wild KRAS (wt-KRAS; 5-year OS: 37.7% vs 53.8%, p = 0.024), although their OS was not different from patients undergoing upfront surgery. Similarly, patients with mt-KRAS had poorer OS than those with wt-KRAS in TBS of 3-9 (5-year OS: 33.1% vs 63.2%, p = 0.001), although their OS was not different from patients with TBS < 3 or ≥ 9. In multivariate analysis, mt-KRAS was an independent prognostic factor of OS among patients receiving preoperative chemotherapy (hazard ratio [HR] 1.61, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.034-2.491; p = 0.035) and patients with TBS of 3-9 (HR 1.836, 95% CI 1.176-2.866; p = 0.008). However, it was not a prognostic factor in patients who underwent upfront surgery or with TBS > 3 or ≥ 9. CONCLUSIONS In patients undergoing hepatectomy for CLM, the prognostic value of KRAS depends on their history of preoperative chemotherapy or tumor burden.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yoshinori Takeda
- Department of Hepatobiliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Juntendo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.,Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Ariake, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yoshihiro Mise
- Department of Hepatobiliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Juntendo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.,Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Ariake, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yu Takahashi
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Ariake, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hiromichi Ito
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Ariake, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yosuke Inoue
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Ariake, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Ryuji Yoshioka
- Department of Hepatobiliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Juntendo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yoshihiro Ono
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Ariake, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Akio Saiura
- Department of Hepatobiliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Juntendo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan. .,Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Ariake, Tokyo, Japan.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Amini N, Andreatos N, Margonis GA, Buettner S, Wang J, Galjart B, Wagner D, Sasaki K, Angelou A, Sun J, Kamphues C, Beer A, Morioka D, Løes IM, Antoniou E, Imai K, Pikoulis E, He J, Kaczirek K, Poultsides G, Verhoef C, Lønning PE, Endo I, Baba H, Kornprat P, NAucejo F, Kreis ME, Christopher WL, Weiss MJ, Safar B, Burkhart RA. Mutant KRAS as a prognostic biomarker after hepatectomy for rectal cancer metastases: Does the primary disease site matter? JOURNAL OF HEPATO-BILIARY-PANCREATIC SCIENCES 2021; 29:417-427. [PMID: 34614304 DOI: 10.1002/jhbp.1054] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2021] [Revised: 08/11/2021] [Accepted: 09/16/2021] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The prognostic implication of mutant KRAS (mKRAS) among patients with primary disease in the rectum remains unknown. METHODS From 2000 to 2018, patients undergoing hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases at 10 collaborating international institutions with documented KRAS status were surveyed. RESULTS A total of 834 (65.8%) patients with primary colon cancer and 434 (34.2%) patients with primary rectal cancer were included. In patients with primary colon cancer, mKRAS served as a reliable prognostic biomarker of poor overall survival (OS) (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.58, 95% CI 1.28-1.95) in the multivariable analysis. Although a trend towards significance was noted, mKRAS was not found to be an independent predictor of OS in patients with primary rectal tumors (HR 1.34, 95% CI 0.98-1.80). For colon cancer, the specific codon impacted in mKRAS appears to reflect underlying disease biology and oncologic outcomes, with codon 13 being associated with particularly poor OS in patients with left-sided tumors (codon 12, HR 1.56, 95% CI 1.22-1.99; codon 13, HR 2.10 95% CI 1.43-3.08;). Stratifying the rectal patient population by codon mutation did not confer prognostic significance following hepatectomy. CONCLUSIONS While the left-sided colonic disease is frequently grouped with rectal disease, our analysis suggests that there exist fundamental biologic differences that drive disparate outcomes. Although there was a trend toward significance of KRAS mutations for patients with primary rectal cancers, it failed to achieve statistical significance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Neda Amini
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Nikolaos Andreatos
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.,Department of Internal Medicine and Taussig Cancer Institute, and Department of General Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Digestive Disease Institute, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Georgios Antonios Margonis
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.,Department of Surgery, Pancreas Institute, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Stefan Buettner
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.,Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jaeyun Wang
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Boris Galjart
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Doris Wagner
- Department of General Surgery, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Kazunari Sasaki
- Department of Internal Medicine and Taussig Cancer Institute, and Department of General Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Digestive Disease Institute, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Anastasios Angelou
- Department of Internal Medicine and Taussig Cancer Institute, and Department of General Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Digestive Disease Institute, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Jinger Sun
- Department of Internal Medicine and Taussig Cancer Institute, and Department of General Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Digestive Disease Institute, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Carsten Kamphues
- Department of General, Visceral and Vascular Surgery, Charite Campus Benjamin Franklin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Andrea Beer
- Department of General Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Daisuke Morioka
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama, Japan
| | - Inger Marie Løes
- Department of Clinical Science, University of Bergen, and Department of Oncology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
| | - Efstathios Antoniou
- Second Department of Propedeutic Surgery, Laiko General Hospital, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Katsunori Imai
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan
| | - Emmanouil Pikoulis
- Third Department of Surgery, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Attikon University Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Jin He
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Klaus Kaczirek
- Department of General Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - George Poultsides
- Department of Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Cornelis Verhoef
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Per Eystein Lønning
- Department of Clinical Science, University of Bergen, and Department of Oncology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
| | - Itaru Endo
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama, Japan
| | - Hideo Baba
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan
| | - Peter Kornprat
- Department of General Surgery, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Federico NAucejo
- Department of Internal Medicine and Taussig Cancer Institute, and Department of General Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Digestive Disease Institute, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Martin E Kreis
- Department of General, Visceral and Vascular Surgery, Charite Campus Benjamin Franklin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Wolfgang L Christopher
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Matthew J Weiss
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Bashar Safar
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Richard Andrew Burkhart
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Pikouli A, Papaconstantinou D, Wang J, Kavezou F, Pararas N, Nastos C, Pikoulis E, Margonis GA. Reevaluating the prognostic role of BRAF mutation in colorectal cancer liver metastases. Am J Surg 2021; 223:879-883. [PMID: 34544580 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2021.09.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2021] [Revised: 08/08/2021] [Accepted: 09/06/2021] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Mutations in the BRAF proto-oncogene have been shown to predict poor patient survival following curative-intent liver surgery for metastatic colorectal cancer. The aim of the present systematic review and meta-analysis is to evaluate the effect of mutated BRAF status (mutBRAF) on the overall (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) in these patients. METHODS A comprehensive literature search was performed for studies reporting outcomes of patients undergoing curative-intent surgery stratified by BRAF mutation status. Subgroup analysis was performed to evaluate whether inclusion of KRAS mutation status significantly influenced the results. RESULTS Six studies incorporating 1857 patients with known BRAF status were identified. Pooled results revealed significantly worse OS (Hazard Ratio 2.8, 95% C.I. 2.09 to 3.77) and DFS (Hazard Ratio 2.29, 95% C.I. 2.09 to 3.77) in mutBRAF patients. Subgroup analysis revealed no statistically significant impact of including KRAS status testing on the obtained results. CONCLUSIONS Patients with metastatic colorectal cancer carrying BRAF mutations have significantly worse oncologic outcomes following surgery and more aggressive disease phenotype overall.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anastasia Pikouli
- Third Department of Surgery, Attikon University Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens Medical School, Greece
| | - Dimitrios Papaconstantinou
- Third Department of Surgery, Attikon University Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens Medical School, Greece.
| | - Jane Wang
- Department of Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Foteini Kavezou
- Second Department of Anesthesiology, Attikon University Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens Medical School, Greece
| | - Nikolaos Pararas
- Third Department of Surgery, Attikon University Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens Medical School, Greece
| | - Constantinos Nastos
- Third Department of Surgery, Attikon University Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens Medical School, Greece
| | - Emmanouil Pikoulis
- Third Department of Surgery, Attikon University Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens Medical School, Greece
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Zhao L, Wang Q, Zhao SD, Zhou J, Jiang KW, Ye YJ, Wang S, Shen ZL. Genetic mutations associated with sensitivity to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in metastatic colon cancer: A case report and review of literature. World J Clin Cases 2021; 9:7099-7109. [PMID: 34540965 PMCID: PMC8409210 DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v9.i24.7099] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/26/2020] [Revised: 05/14/2021] [Accepted: 07/12/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Colorectal liver metastases (CLM) occur in 15%-30% of patients with colorectal cancer (CRC). Advancements in next generation sequencing (NGS) can provide more precise prognoses for cancer patients and help guide clinical treatment. However, the genetic variants that predict high sensitivity to neoadjuvant chemotherapy remain unclear, especially in patients with CLM. The aim of this study was to identify the relevant genetic variants in a single CLM patient and to summarize the current evidence on mutations and single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) that objectively predict sensitivity to neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
CASE SUMMARY A 76-year-old male patient, who was diagnosed as stage IV colon cancer with liver metastases, was found to have APC/TP53/KRAS mutations. He showed a good therapeutic response to 12 courses of oxaliplatin regimens combined with Bevacizumab. Genetic analysis of the patient identified 5 genes with 7 detected SNPs that may be related to a better response to chemotherapy drugs. In addition, a critical literature review was performed based on a standardized appraisal form after selecting the articles. Ultimately, 21 eligible studies were appraised to assess the association between gene mutations and good prognosis. Mutations in KRAS, TP53, SMAD4, and APC were identified as being associated with a poor response to chemotherapy drugs, whereas mutations of CREBBP and POLD1 were associated with longer overall survival.
CONCLUSION NGS can identify precise predictors of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy, leading to improved outcomes for CRC patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Long Zhao
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Laboratory of Surgical Oncology, Beijing Key Laboratory of Colorectal Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment Research, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing 100044, China
| | - Quan Wang
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Laboratory of Surgical Oncology, Beijing Key Laboratory of Colorectal Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment Research, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing 100044, China
| | - Shi-Dong Zhao
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Laboratory of Surgical Oncology, Beijing Key Laboratory of Colorectal Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment Research, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing 100044, China
| | - Jing Zhou
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Laboratory of Surgical Oncology, Beijing Key Laboratory of Colorectal Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment Research, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing 100044, China
| | - Ke-Wei Jiang
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Laboratory of Surgical Oncology, Beijing Key Laboratory of Colorectal Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment Research, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing 100044, China
| | - Ying-Jiang Ye
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Laboratory of Surgical Oncology, Beijing Key Laboratory of Colorectal Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment Research, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing 100044, China
| | - Shan Wang
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Laboratory of Surgical Oncology, Beijing Key Laboratory of Colorectal Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment Research, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing 100044, China
| | - Zhan-Long Shen
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Laboratory of Surgical Oncology, Beijing Key Laboratory of Colorectal Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment Research, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing 100044, China
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Abstract
Colorectal cancers (CRC) with B-RAF mutation carry a particularly poor prognosis. In this context, the value of first-line intensified chemotherapy associated with an anti-VEGF (Vascular endothelial growth factor) to treat metastatic CRC has recently been called into question. In patients with mutated B-RAF, the efficacy of first-line anti-EGFR (Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor) associated with chemotherapy for treatment of metastatic CRC is uncertain while that of anti-VEGF has been shown to be effective. The therapeutic pathways involving inhibition of B-RAF activity, although ineffective as monotherapy, have received marketing authorization when used in association with anti-EGFR for second-line treatment of metastatic CRC. Immunotherapy has provided very encouraging results in a recent phase III study in patients with microsatellite instability, irrespective of their B-RAF status. Finally, new therapies, targeting other RAF proteins and other specific receptors are currently under development. Surgery for liver metastases in patients with the B-RAF mutation should be considered whenever possible, after a complete search for peritoneal carcinomatosis and distant metastases, similarly to workup for patients without the B-RAF mutation.
Collapse
|
10
|
Lièvre A, de la Fouchardière C, Samalin E, Benoist S, Phelip JM, André T, Lledo G. [BRAF V600E-mutant colorectal cancers: Where are we?]. Bull Cancer 2020; 107:881-895. [PMID: 32674932 DOI: 10.1016/j.bulcan.2020.04.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2020] [Revised: 04/22/2020] [Accepted: 04/23/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
The BRAFV600E mutation, observed in 8 % of colorectal cancers (CRC), introduces a particular phenotype and a poor prognosis at the localized or metastatic stage. BRAF mutant CRCs are more often localized in the right colon, poorly differentiated and mucinous. They affect an older population (more often female) and are associated with a more frequent metastatic lymph node and peritoneal evolution. The BRAFV600E mutation is associated with a sporadic microsatellite instability (MSI) status in 20 to 40% of cases. In localized colon cancer, it does not imply any modification of the adjuvant treatment. In metastatic CRC, the first action must be the systematic search for an MSI phenotype, given its frequent association with the presence of a BRAF mutation, in order to propose immunotherapy that has been demonstrated to be very effective in MSI metastatic CRC. In non-MSI CRC, a first-line trichimiotherapy associated with bevacizumab is an option to be favored in patients in good general condition but the association with an anti-EGFR can be discussed, especially when the objective is tumor response. At the same time, surgical resection must be systematically discussed in the case of resectable hepatic metastases since the presence of a BRAFV600E mutation is not a risk factor for recurrence and that prolonged survival may be observed after surgery. In the second or third line, the triplet encorafenib, binimetinib and cetuximab, as well as the doublet encorafenib and cetuximab are superior to the association of irinotecan plus cetuximab in terms of response and survival (phase III study BEACON) and represent a new therapeutic standard. Their use on the front line is under study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Astrid Lièvre
- Service des maladies de l'appareil digestif, CHU Pontchaillou, université Rennes 1, Rennes, France.
| | | | - Emmanuelle Samalin
- Département d'oncologie, institut du cancer de Montpellier (ICM), University Montpellier, Montpellier et institut de génomique fonctionnelle, CNRS, inserm, university Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | - Stéphane Benoist
- service de chirurgie digestive et oncologique, CHU Bicêtre, AP-HP, université Paris-Saclay, Le Kremlin Bicêtre, France
| | - Jean-Marc Phelip
- Service de gastroentérologie, CHU Saint-Étienne, Saint-Etienne, France
| | - Thierry André
- Département d'oncologie médicale, Sorbonne université, hôpital Saint-Antoine, AP-HP, 7512 Paris, France
| | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Tohme S, Sanin GD, Patel V, Bress K, Ahmed N, Krane A, Tsung A, Steel JL. Health-Related Quality of Life as a Prognostic Factor in Patients After Resection of Hepatic Malignancies. J Surg Res 2019; 245:257-264. [PMID: 31421371 DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2019.07.061] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2019] [Revised: 07/07/2019] [Accepted: 07/18/2019] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Numerous studies have argued health-related quality of life (HRQoL) measures to be prognostic of survival in patients with chronic disease processes including cancer; however, only a few small studies have evaluated HRQoL changes in the setting of oncologic resections. The objectives of the present study were to investigate factors predicting HRQoL, the change in HRQoL over time, and HRQoL prognostic value in patients undergoing surgical resection of hepatic malignancies. METHODS We administered the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Hepatobiliary, Center for Epidemiologic Studies-Depression, Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Fatigue, and Brief Pain Inventory to 128 patients with primary and metastatic hepatic malignancies enrolled between January 2008 to November 2011 and November 2013 to June 2015. Quality of life was obtained at the baseline, 4, 8, and 12 mo, using HRQoL questionnaires. RESULTS The mean age of all patients included was 61 y, 42.6% had hepatocellular carcinoma, and 50.7% had metastatic colorectal carcinoma. HRQoL decreased from baseline at the 4-mo follow-up but stabilized to preoperative values at 8 and 12 mo. Depressive symptoms (P < 0.001), pain (P = 0.032), and fatigue (P < 0.001) were associated with HRQoL before surgery. Variables associated with HRQoL at 8 mo included extrahepatic recurrence (P = 0.002), depressive symptoms (P < 0.001), pain (P < 0.001), fatigue (P < 0.001), tumor macrovascular (P = 0.011), and microvascular invasion (P = 0.003). Using Cox regression and adjusting for demographics and disease-specific factors, preoperative HRQoL was significantly associated with overall survival. CONCLUSIONS HRQoL is independently associated with survival in patients with liver malignancies undergoing surgical resection. Major curative liver surgery can be performed with short-term worsening of HRQoL but long-term improvement and stabilization in overall quality of life for patients with cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samer Tohme
- Department of Surgery, UPMC Presbyterian, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
| | - Gloria D Sanin
- Department of Surgery, UPMC Presbyterian, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Vishaal Patel
- University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Kathryn Bress
- UPMC Liver Cancer Center, Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Naadia Ahmed
- UPMC Liver Cancer Center, Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Andrew Krane
- UPMC Liver Cancer Center, Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Allan Tsung
- UPMC Liver Cancer Center, Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Jennifer L Steel
- UPMC Liver Cancer Center, Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Kawaguchi Y, Lillemoe HA, Vauthey JN. Gene mutation and surgical technique: Suggestion or more? Surg Oncol 2019; 33:210-215. [PMID: 31351766 DOI: 10.1016/j.suronc.2019.07.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2019] [Accepted: 07/18/2019] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Advancements in chemotherapy and molecular targeted therapy have improved long-term outcomes for patients with resectable colorectal liver metastases (CLM). RAS mutation status was an original focus as a molecular biomarker as it predicted treatments response to anti-epidermal growth factor receptor agents. More recently, studies have incorporated somatic mutation data in analyses pertaining to surgical outcomes and prognosis. This evidenced-based review covers the implications of somatic mutations in patients undergoing resection of CLM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yoshikuni Kawaguchi
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Heather A Lillemoe
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jean-Nicolas Vauthey
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Clinical significance and prognostic relevance of KRAS, BRAF, PI3K and TP53 genetic mutation analysis for resectable and unresectable colorectal liver metastases: A systematic review of the current evidence. Surg Oncol 2018; 27:280-288. [DOI: 10.1016/j.suronc.2018.05.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 89] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2018] [Revised: 04/27/2018] [Accepted: 05/03/2018] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
|
14
|
Omichi K, Shindoh J, Cloyd JM, Mizuno T, Chun YS, Conrad C, Aloia TA, Tzeng CWD, Vauthey JN. Liver resection is justified for patients with bilateral multiple colorectal liver metastases: A propensity-score-matched analysis. Eur J Surg Oncol 2017; 44:122-129. [PMID: 29208318 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2017.11.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2017] [Revised: 10/20/2017] [Accepted: 11/08/2017] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Increasingly, patients with multiple colorectal liver metastases (CLM) are surgically treated. Some studies have shown that patients with bilobar and unilobar multiple CLM have similar outcomes, but other have shown that patients with bilobar CLM have worse outcomes after resection. We aimed to compare clinical outcomes of surgical treatment of bilobar and unilobar CLM using propensity score matching. METHODS The single-institution study included patients who underwent hepatectomy for ≥3 histologically confirmed CLM during 1998-2014. Clinicopathologic characteristics and long-term outcomes were compared between patients with bilobar and unilobar CLM in a propensity-score-adjusted cohort. RESULTS A total of 473 patients met the inclusion criteria, 271 (57%) with bilobar and 202 (43%) with unilobar CLM. In the propensity-score-matched population (bilobar, 170; unilobar, 170), no differences were observed according to the distribution of CLM except for a greater frequency of concomitant ablation, and R1 resection in the bilobar group. There was no difference between the bilobar and unilobar groups in 5-year overall survival rates (46% and 49%, respectively; P = 0.740) or 3-year recurrence-free survival rates (21% and 24%, respectively; P = 0.674). CONCLUSIONS Tumor distribution may not affect the curability of surgery for multiple CLM. Liver resection would be justified for selected patients with bilobar CLM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kiyohiko Omichi
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Junichi Shindoh
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA; Hepatobiliary-Pancreatic Surgery Division, Department of Digestive Surgery, Toranomon Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Jordan M Cloyd
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Takashi Mizuno
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Yun Shin Chun
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Claudius Conrad
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Thomas A Aloia
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Ching-Wei D Tzeng
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jean-Nicolas Vauthey
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Nagtegaal ID, Knijn N, Hugen N, Marshall HC, Sugihara K, Tot T, Ueno H, Quirke P. Tumor Deposits in Colorectal Cancer: Improving the Value of Modern Staging-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Clin Oncol 2016; 35:1119-1127. [PMID: 28029327 DOI: 10.1200/jco.2016.68.9091] [Citation(s) in RCA: 148] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Colorectal cancer (CRC) treatment is largely determined by tumor stage. Despite improvements made in the treatment of various types of metastatic disease, staging has not been refined. The role of tumor deposits (TDs) in staging remains debated. We have assessed the relation of TDs with metastatic pattern to evaluate whether TDs might add significant new information to staging. Methods We performed a systematic literature search that was focused on the role of TDs in CRC. Studies with neoadjuvant-treated patients were excluded. Data on stage, histologic factors, and outcome were extracted. Data from four large cohorts were analyzed for the relevance of the presence of TDs, lymph node metastases (LNMs), and extramural vascular invasion (EMVI) on the pattern of metastases and outcomes. Results Of 10,106 included patients with CRC, 22% presented with TDs. TDs are invariably associated with poor outcome. Presence of TDs was associated with presence of LNMs and EMVI. In a pairwise comparison, effects of TD were stronger than those of both LNMs and EMVI. In the logistic regression model, TDs in combination with LNMs is the strongest predictor for liver (odds ratio [OR], 5.5), lung (OR, 4.3) and peritoneal metastases (OR, 7.0). Presence of EMVI adds information for liver and lung metastases, but not for peritoneal metastases. Conclusion We have shown that TDs are not equal to LNMs or EMVI with respect to biology and outcome. We lose valuable prognostic information by allocating TDs into nodal category N1c and only considering TDs in the absence of LNMs. Therefore, we propose that the number of TDs should be added to the number of LNMs to derive a final N stage.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Iris D Nagtegaal
- Iris D. Nagtegaal, Nikki Knijn, and Niek Hugen, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands; Helen C. Marshall and Philip Quirke, Leeds University, Leeds, United Kingdom; Kenichi Sugihara, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo; Hideki Ueno, National Defence Medical College, Tokorozawa, Japan; and Tibor Tot, Falu Lasarett, Falun, Sweden
| | - Nikki Knijn
- Iris D. Nagtegaal, Nikki Knijn, and Niek Hugen, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands; Helen C. Marshall and Philip Quirke, Leeds University, Leeds, United Kingdom; Kenichi Sugihara, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo; Hideki Ueno, National Defence Medical College, Tokorozawa, Japan; and Tibor Tot, Falu Lasarett, Falun, Sweden
| | - Niek Hugen
- Iris D. Nagtegaal, Nikki Knijn, and Niek Hugen, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands; Helen C. Marshall and Philip Quirke, Leeds University, Leeds, United Kingdom; Kenichi Sugihara, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo; Hideki Ueno, National Defence Medical College, Tokorozawa, Japan; and Tibor Tot, Falu Lasarett, Falun, Sweden
| | - Helen C Marshall
- Iris D. Nagtegaal, Nikki Knijn, and Niek Hugen, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands; Helen C. Marshall and Philip Quirke, Leeds University, Leeds, United Kingdom; Kenichi Sugihara, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo; Hideki Ueno, National Defence Medical College, Tokorozawa, Japan; and Tibor Tot, Falu Lasarett, Falun, Sweden
| | - Kenichi Sugihara
- Iris D. Nagtegaal, Nikki Knijn, and Niek Hugen, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands; Helen C. Marshall and Philip Quirke, Leeds University, Leeds, United Kingdom; Kenichi Sugihara, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo; Hideki Ueno, National Defence Medical College, Tokorozawa, Japan; and Tibor Tot, Falu Lasarett, Falun, Sweden
| | - Tibor Tot
- Iris D. Nagtegaal, Nikki Knijn, and Niek Hugen, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands; Helen C. Marshall and Philip Quirke, Leeds University, Leeds, United Kingdom; Kenichi Sugihara, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo; Hideki Ueno, National Defence Medical College, Tokorozawa, Japan; and Tibor Tot, Falu Lasarett, Falun, Sweden
| | - Hideki Ueno
- Iris D. Nagtegaal, Nikki Knijn, and Niek Hugen, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands; Helen C. Marshall and Philip Quirke, Leeds University, Leeds, United Kingdom; Kenichi Sugihara, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo; Hideki Ueno, National Defence Medical College, Tokorozawa, Japan; and Tibor Tot, Falu Lasarett, Falun, Sweden
| | - Philip Quirke
- Iris D. Nagtegaal, Nikki Knijn, and Niek Hugen, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands; Helen C. Marshall and Philip Quirke, Leeds University, Leeds, United Kingdom; Kenichi Sugihara, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo; Hideki Ueno, National Defence Medical College, Tokorozawa, Japan; and Tibor Tot, Falu Lasarett, Falun, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Vreugdenburg TD, Ma N, Duncan JK, Riitano D, Cameron AL, Maddern GJ. Comparative diagnostic accuracy of hepatocyte-specific gadoxetic acid (Gd-EOB-DTPA) enhanced MR imaging and contrast enhanced CT for the detection of liver metastases: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Colorectal Dis 2016; 31:1739-1749. [PMID: 27682648 DOI: 10.1007/s00384-016-2664-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 61] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/19/2016] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE This systematic review evaluated the diagnostic accuracy and impact on patient management of hepatocyte-specific gadoxetic acid enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (GA-MRI) compared to contrast enhanced computed tomography (CE-CT) in patients with liver metastases. METHOD Four biomedical databases (PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, York CRD) were searched from January 1991 to February 2016. Studies investigating the accuracy or management impact of GA-MRI compared to CE-CT in patients with known or suspected liver metastases were included. Bias was evaluated using QUADAS-II. Univariate meta-analysis of sensitivity ratios (RR) were conducted in the absence of heterogeneity, calculated using I 2 , Tau values (τ) and prediction intervals. RESULTS Nine diagnostic accuracy studies (537 patients with 1216 lesions) and four change in management studies (488 patients with 281 lesions) were included. Per-lesion sensitivity and specificity estimates for GA-MRI ranged from 86.9-100.0 % and 80.2-98.0 %, respectively, compared to 51.8-84.6 % and 77.2-98.0 % for CE-CT. Meta-analysis found GA-MRI to be significantly more sensitive than CE-CT (RR = 1.29, 95 % CI = 1.18-1.40, P < 0.001), with equivalent specificity (RR = 0.97, 95 % CI 0.910-1.042, P = 0.44). The largest difference was observed for lesions smaller than 10 mm for which GA-MRI was significantly more sensitive (RR = 2.21, 95 % CI = 1.47-3.32, P < 0.001) but less specific (RR = 0.92, 95 % CI 0.87-0.98, P = 0.008). GA-MRI affected clinical management in 26 of 155 patients (16.8 %) who had a prior CE-CT; however, no studies investigated the consequences of using GA-MRI instead of CE-CT. CONCLUSION GA-MRI is significantly more sensitive than CE-CT for detecting liver metastases, which leads to a modest impact on patient management in the context of an equivocal CE-CT result.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas D Vreugdenburg
- Australian Safety and Efficacy Register of New Interventional Procedures-Surgical (ASERNIP-S), The Royal Australasian College of Surgeons, 199 Ward Street, North Adelaide, South Australia, 5006, Australia.
| | - Ning Ma
- Australian Safety and Efficacy Register of New Interventional Procedures-Surgical (ASERNIP-S), The Royal Australasian College of Surgeons, 199 Ward Street, North Adelaide, South Australia, 5006, Australia
| | - Joanna K Duncan
- Australian Safety and Efficacy Register of New Interventional Procedures-Surgical (ASERNIP-S), The Royal Australasian College of Surgeons, 199 Ward Street, North Adelaide, South Australia, 5006, Australia
| | - Dagmara Riitano
- Australian Safety and Efficacy Register of New Interventional Procedures-Surgical (ASERNIP-S), The Royal Australasian College of Surgeons, 199 Ward Street, North Adelaide, South Australia, 5006, Australia
| | - Alun L Cameron
- Australian Safety and Efficacy Register of New Interventional Procedures-Surgical (ASERNIP-S), The Royal Australasian College of Surgeons, 199 Ward Street, North Adelaide, South Australia, 5006, Australia
| | - Guy J Maddern
- Australian Safety and Efficacy Register of New Interventional Procedures-Surgical (ASERNIP-S), The Royal Australasian College of Surgeons, 199 Ward Street, North Adelaide, South Australia, 5006, Australia
- Discipline of Surgery, University of Adelaide and The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
van der Stok EP, Smid M, Sieuwerts AM, Vermeulen PB, Sleijfer S, Ayez N, Grünhagen DJ, Martens JWM, Verhoef C. mRNA expression profiles of colorectal liver metastases as a novel biomarker for early recurrence after partial hepatectomy. Mol Oncol 2016; 10:1542-1550. [PMID: 27692894 DOI: 10.1016/j.molonc.2016.09.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2016] [Revised: 08/31/2016] [Accepted: 09/12/2016] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Identification of specific risk groups for recurrence after surgery for isolated colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) remains challenging due to the heterogeneity of the disease. Classical clinicopathologic parameters have limited prognostic value. The aim of this study was to identify a gene expression signature measured in CRLM discriminating early from late recurrence after partial hepatectomy. METHODS CRLM from two patient groups were collected: I) with recurrent disease ≤12 months after surgery (N = 33), and II) without recurrences and disease free for ≥36 months (N = 30). The patients were clinically homogeneous; all had a low clinical risk score (0-2) and did not receive (neo-) adjuvant chemotherapy. Total RNA was hybridised to Illumina arrays, and processed for analysis. A leave-one-out cross validation (LOOCV) analysis was performed to identify a prognostic gene expression signature. RESULTS LOOCV yielded an 11-gene profile with prognostic value in relation to recurrent disease ≤12 months after partial hepatectomy. This signature had a sensitivity of 81.8%, with a specificity of 66.7% for predicting recurrences (≤12 months) versus no recurrences for at least 36 months after surgery (X2 P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION The current study yielded an 11-gene signature at mRNA level in CRLM discriminating early from late or no relapse after partial hepatectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E P van der Stok
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Groene Hilledijk 301, 3075 EA Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - M Smid
- Department of Medical Oncology and Cancer Genomics Netherlands, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, 's-Gravendijkwal 230, 3015 CE Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - A M Sieuwerts
- Department of Medical Oncology and Cancer Genomics Netherlands, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, 's-Gravendijkwal 230, 3015 CE Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - P B Vermeulen
- Translational Cancer Research Group, Sint-Augustinus (GZA Hospitals) & CORE (Antwerp University), Oosterveldlaan 24, 2610 Wilrijk-Antwerp, Belgium
| | - S Sleijfer
- Department of Medical Oncology and Cancer Genomics Netherlands, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, 's-Gravendijkwal 230, 3015 CE Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - N Ayez
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Groene Hilledijk 301, 3075 EA Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - D J Grünhagen
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Groene Hilledijk 301, 3075 EA Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - J W M Martens
- Department of Medical Oncology and Cancer Genomics Netherlands, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, 's-Gravendijkwal 230, 3015 CE Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - C Verhoef
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Groene Hilledijk 301, 3075 EA Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Laparoscopic simultaneous resection of colorectal primary tumor and liver metastases: a propensity score matching analysis. Surg Endosc 2015; 30 Suppl 1:1-62. [PMID: 26275554 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-016-4766-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Preliminary series have shown the feasibility of combined laparoscopic resection of colorectal cancer (CRC) and synchronous colorectal liver metastases (SCRLM). The aim of this study was to compare the short- and long-term outcomes for matched patients undergoing combined resections. METHODS An international multicenter database of 142 patients that underwent combined laparoscopic resection of CRC and SCRLM between 1997 and 2013 was compared to a database of 241 patients treated by open during the same period. Comparison of short- and long-term outcomes was performed after propensity score adjustment. RESULTS After matching, 89 patients were compared in each group including mostly ASA I-II patients, presenting with mean number of 1.5 CRLM, with a mean diameter of 30 mm, and resectable by a wedge resection or a left lateral sectionectomy. A rectal resection was required in 46 and 43 % of laparoscopic and open procedures, respectively (p = 0.65). There was no difference in global operative time, blood loss and transfusion rates between the two groups. A conversion was required in 7 % of the laparoscopic procedures. Morbidity rates were similar in the two groups (p = 1.0). The 3-year overall survival in the laparoscopy and open groups were 78 and 65 %, respectively (p = 0.17). CONCLUSIONS In patients without severe comorbidities presenting with one, small (≤3 cm), CRLM resectable by a wedge resection or a left lateral sectionectomy, combined laparoscopic resection of CRC and SCRLM allowed similar short- and long-term outcomes compared with the open approach.
Collapse
|
19
|
Laparoscopic simultaneous resection of colorectal primary tumor and liver metastases: a propensity score matching analysis. Surg Endosc 2015; 30:1853-62. [PMID: 26275554 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-015-4467-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2015] [Accepted: 07/22/2015] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Preliminary series have shown the feasibility of combined laparoscopic resection of colorectal cancer (CRC) and synchronous colorectal liver metastases (SCRLM). The aim of this study was to compare the short- and long-term outcomes for matched patients undergoing combined resections. METHODS An international multicenter database of 142 patients that underwent combined laparoscopic resection of CRC and SCRLM between 1997 and 2013 was compared to a database of 241 patients treated by open during the same period. Comparison of short- and long-term outcomes was performed after propensity score adjustment. RESULTS After matching, 89 patients were compared in each group including mostly ASA I-II patients, presenting with mean number of 1.5 CRLM, with a mean diameter of 30 mm, and resectable by a wedge resection or a left lateral sectionectomy. A rectal resection was required in 46 and 43 % of laparoscopic and open procedures, respectively (p = 0.65). There was no difference in global operative time, blood loss and transfusion rates between the two groups. A conversion was required in 7 % of the laparoscopic procedures. Morbidity rates were similar in the two groups (p = 1.0). The 3-year overall survival in the laparoscopy and open groups were 78 and 65 %, respectively (p = 0.17). CONCLUSIONS In patients without severe comorbidities presenting with one, small (≤3 cm), CRLM resectable by a wedge resection or a left lateral sectionectomy, combined laparoscopic resection of CRC and SCRLM allowed similar short- and long-term outcomes compared with the open approach.
Collapse
|
20
|
Laparoscopic Simultaneous Resection of Colorectal Primary Tumor and Liver Metastases: Results of a Multicenter International Study. World J Surg 2015; 39:2052-60. [DOI: 10.1007/s00268-015-3034-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
|