1
|
Bos MK, Lam SW, Motta G, Helmijr JCA, Beaufort CM, de Jonge E, Martens JWM, Boven E, Jansen MPHM, Jager A, Sleijfer S. Plasma ESR1 mutations and outcome to first-line paclitaxel and bevacizumab in patients with advanced ER-positive/HER2-negative breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2023:10.1007/s10549-023-06965-5. [PMID: 37226020 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-023-06965-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2022] [Accepted: 05/02/2023] [Indexed: 05/26/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND ESR1 mutations have been identified as mechanism for endocrine resistance and are also associated with a decreased overall survival. We assessed ESR1 mutations in circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) for impact on outcome to taxane-based chemotherapy in advanced breast cancer patients. METHODS ESR1 mutations were determined in archived plasma samples from patients treated with paclitaxel and bevacizumab (AT arm, N = 91) in the randomized phase II ATX study. Samples collected at baseline (n = 51) and at cycle 2 (n = 13, C2) were analyzed using a breast cancer next-generation sequencing panel. This study was powered to detect a benefit in progression-free survival (PFS) at six months for patients treated with paclitaxel/bevacizumab compared to historical trials with fulvestrant. PFS, overall survival (OS), and ctDNA dynamics were exploratory analyses. RESULTS PFS at six months was 86% (18/21) in patients with an ESR1 mutation detected and 85% (23/27) in wildtype ESR1 patients. In our exploratory analysis, median progression-free survival (PFS) was 8.2 months [95% CI, 7.6-8.8] for ESR1 mutant patients versus 8.7 months [95% confidence interval (CI), 8.3-9.2] for ESR1 wildtype patients [p = 0.47]. The median overall survival (OS) was 20.7 months [95% CI, 6.6-33.7] for ESR1 mutant patients versus 28.1 months [95% confidence interval (CI), 19.3-36.9] for ESR1 wildtype patients [p = 0.27]. Patients with ≥ two ESR1 mutations had a significantly worse OS, but not PFS, compared to those who did not [p = 0.003]. Change in ctDNA level at C2 was not different between ESR1 and other mutations. CONCLUSIONS Presence of ESR1 mutations in baseline ctDNA might not be associated with inferior PFS and OS in advanced breast cancer patients treated with paclitaxel/bevacizumab.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M K Bos
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015, GD, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - S W Lam
- Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam/Cancer Center Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 , HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Radiology, The Netherlands, Cancer Institute/Antoni Van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066, CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - G Motta
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015, GD, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- IOM (Mediterranean Institute of Oncology) Research, Viagrande, Catania, Italy
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, A.O.U. Policlinico-Vittorio Emanuele, Center of Experimental Oncology and Hematology, University of Catania, Catania, Italy
| | - J C A Helmijr
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015, GD, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - C M Beaufort
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015, GD, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - E de Jonge
- Department of Clinical Chemistry, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - J W M Martens
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015, GD, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - E Boven
- Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam/Cancer Center Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 , HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - M P H M Jansen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015, GD, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - A Jager
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015, GD, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - S Sleijfer
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015, GD, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Naumann FV, Sweep FCGJ, Adema GJ, Peeters WJM, Martens JWM, Bussink J, Span PN. Tamoxifen induces radioresistance through NRF2-mediated metabolic reprogramming in breast cancer. Cancer Metab 2023; 11:3. [PMID: 36755288 PMCID: PMC9909892 DOI: 10.1186/s40170-023-00304-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2022] [Accepted: 01/29/2023] [Indexed: 02/10/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Recently, we reported that tamoxifen-resistant (TAM-R) breast cancer cells are cross-resistant to irradiation. Here, we investigated the mechanisms associated with tamoxifen-induced radioresistance, aiming to prevent or reverse resistance and improve breast cancer treatment. METHODS Wild-type ERα-positive MCF7 and ERα-negative MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells and their TAM-R counterparts were analyzed for cellular metabolism using the Seahorse metabolic analyzer. Real-time ROS production, toxicity, and antioxidant capacity in response to H2O2, tamoxifen, and irradiation were determined. Tumor material from 28 breast cancer patients before and after short-term presurgical tamoxifen (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00738777, August 19, 2008) and cellular material was analyzed for NRF2 gene expression and immunohistochemistry. Re-sensitization of TAM-R cells to irradiation was established using pharmacological inhibition. RESULTS TAM-R cells exhibited decreased oxygen consumption and increased glycolysis, suggesting mitochondrial dysfunction. However, this did not explain radioresistance, as cells without mitochondria (Rho-0) were actually more radiosensitive. Real-time measurement of ROS after tamoxifen and H2O2 exposure indicated lower ROS levels and toxicity in TAM-R cells. Consistently, higher antioxidant levels were found in TAM-R cells, providing protection from irradiation-induced ROS. NRF2, a main activator of the antioxidant response, was increased in TAM-R cells and in tumor tissue of patients treated with short-term presurgical tamoxifen. NRF2 inhibition re-sensitized TAM-R cells to irradiation. CONCLUSION Mechanisms underlying tamoxifen-induced radioresistance are linked to cellular adaptations to persistently increased ROS levels, leading to cells with chronically upregulated antioxidant capacity and glycolysis. Pharmacological inhibition of antioxidant responses re-sensitizes breast cancer cells to irradiation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F. V. Naumann
- grid.10417.330000 0004 0444 9382Department of Radiation Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, 6500 HB the Netherlands
| | - F. C. G. J. Sweep
- grid.10417.330000 0004 0444 9382Department of Laboratory Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - G. J. Adema
- grid.10417.330000 0004 0444 9382Department of Radiation Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, 6500 HB the Netherlands
| | - W. J. M. Peeters
- grid.10417.330000 0004 0444 9382Department of Radiation Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, 6500 HB the Netherlands
| | - J. W. M. Martens
- grid.5645.2000000040459992XDepartment of Medical Oncology, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - J. Bussink
- grid.10417.330000 0004 0444 9382Department of Radiation Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, 6500 HB the Netherlands
| | - P. N. Span
- grid.10417.330000 0004 0444 9382Department of Radiation Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, 6500 HB the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
de Kruijff IE, Sieuwerts AM, Beije N, Prager-van der Smissen WJC, Angus L, Beaufort CM, Van MN, Oomen-de Hoop E, Jager A, Hamberg P, de Jongh FE, Kraan J, Martens JWM, Sleijfer S. Prospective Evaluation of a Circulating Tumor Cell Sensitivity Profile to Predict Response to Cisplatin Chemotherapy in Metastatic Breast Cancer Patients. Front Oncol 2021; 11:697572. [PMID: 34249756 PMCID: PMC8269318 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.697572] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2021] [Accepted: 05/27/2021] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Cisplatin (cDDP) has regained interest for metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients, given the platinum sensitivity in subtypes and better manageable toxicity. Here, the primary aim was to determine whether molecular characteristics of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) could identify patients responding to cDDP and to describe the outcomes to cDDP monotherapy in a large group of MBC patients pretreated with anthracycline- and taxane-based treatments. Methods Based on cell line data, a CTC-cDDP-sensitivity profile was generated. Applying an A’Herns single-stage phase II design, further investigation was considered worthwhile if 5/10 patients with a favorable profile responded to cDDP. Patients received 70mg/m2 cDDP every three weeks, CTCs were enumerated and the CTC-cDDP-sensitivity profile was determined. In total, 65 heavily pretreated MBC patients (77% received ≥2 lines of previous chemotherapy for MBC) were eligible for the per-protocol analysis. Primary endpoint was response rate, secondary endpoints included best observed response, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Results The best observed response during cDDP therapy was a partial response in 7% and stable disease in 56% of the patients. None of the patients with a favorable CTC-cDDP-sensitivity profile had a response. The median baseline CTC count was 8 (range 0-3254). Patients with <5 CTCs had a better PFS and OS than patients with ≥5 CTCs (median PFS 4.5 months (95%CI 2.38-6.62) vs. 2.1 months [(95%CI 1.34-2.80)(p=0.009)] and median OS 13.1 months (95%CI 9.89-16.33) vs. 5.6 months [(95%CI 3.60-7.64)(p=0.003)]. No other factors than CTC count were associated with outcome to cDDP therapy, including triple-negative breast cancer versus ER-positive tumors. Conclusions The CTC-cDDP-sensitivity profile was unable to select patients responding to cDDP monotherapy. In an unselected group of heavily pretreated MBC patients, cDDP yields outcomes comparable to other chemotherapeutic regimens for heavily pretreated MBC patients. CTC count was the only factor associated with outcome in these patients. Clinical Trial Registration (https://www.trialregister.nl/trial/3885, identifier NTR4046)
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- I E de Kruijff
- Department of Medical Oncology & Cancer Genomics Netherlands, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - A M Sieuwerts
- Department of Medical Oncology & Cancer Genomics Netherlands, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - N Beije
- Department of Medical Oncology & Cancer Genomics Netherlands, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - W J C Prager-van der Smissen
- Department of Medical Oncology & Cancer Genomics Netherlands, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - L Angus
- Department of Medical Oncology & Cancer Genomics Netherlands, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - C M Beaufort
- Department of Medical Oncology & Cancer Genomics Netherlands, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - M N Van
- Department of Medical Oncology & Cancer Genomics Netherlands, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - E Oomen-de Hoop
- Department of Medical Oncology & Cancer Genomics Netherlands, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - A Jager
- Department of Medical Oncology & Cancer Genomics Netherlands, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - P Hamberg
- Department of Medical Oncology, Franciscus Gasthuis & Vlietland, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - F E de Jongh
- Department of Medical Oncology, Ikazia Ziekenhuis, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - J Kraan
- Department of Medical Oncology & Cancer Genomics Netherlands, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - J W M Martens
- Department of Medical Oncology & Cancer Genomics Netherlands, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - S Sleijfer
- Department of Medical Oncology & Cancer Genomics Netherlands, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Desa DE, Strawderman RL, Wu W, Hill RL, Smid M, Martens JWM, Turner BM, Brown EB. Intratumoral heterogeneity of second-harmonic generation scattering from tumor collagen and its effects on metastatic risk prediction. BMC Cancer 2020; 20:1217. [PMID: 33302909 PMCID: PMC7731482 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-020-07713-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2020] [Accepted: 12/06/2020] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Metastases are the leading cause of breast cancer-related deaths. The tumor microenvironment impacts cancer progression and metastatic ability. Fibrillar collagen, a major extracellular matrix component, can be studied using the light scattering phenomenon known as second-harmonic generation (SHG). The ratio of forward- to backward-scattered SHG photons (F/B) is sensitive to collagen fiber internal structure and has been shown to be an independent prognostic indicator of metastasis-free survival time (MFS). Here we assess the effects of heterogeneity in the tumor matrix on the possible use of F/B as a prognostic tool. Methods SHG imaging was performed on sectioned primary tumor excisions from 95 untreated, estrogen receptor-positive, lymph node negative invasive ductal carcinoma patients. We identified two distinct regions whose collagen displayed different average F/B values, indicative of spatial heterogeneity: the cellular tumor bulk and surrounding tumor-stroma interface. To evaluate the impact of heterogeneity on F/B’s prognostic ability, we performed SHG imaging in the tumor bulk and tumor-stroma interface, calculated a 21-gene recurrence score (surrogate for OncotypeDX®, or S-ODX) for each patient and evaluated their combined prognostic ability. Results We found that F/B measured in tumor-stroma interface, but not tumor bulk, is prognostic of MFS using three methods to select pixels for analysis: an intensity threshold selected by a blinded observer, a histogram-based thresholding method, and an adaptive thresholding method. Using both regression trees and Random Survival Forests for MFS outcome, we obtained data-driven prediction rules that show F/B from tumor-stroma interface, but not tumor bulk, and S-ODX both contribute to predicting MFS in this patient cohort. We also separated patients into low-intermediate (S-ODX < 26) and high risk (S-ODX ≥26) groups. In the low-intermediate risk group, comprised of patients not typically recommended for adjuvant chemotherapy, we find that F/B from the tumor-stroma interface is prognostic of MFS and can identify a patient cohort with poor outcomes. Conclusions These data demonstrate that intratumoral heterogeneity in F/B values can play an important role in its possible use as a prognostic marker, and that F/B from tumor-stroma interface of primary tumor excisions may provide useful information to stratify patients by metastatic risk. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12885-020-07713-4.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Danielle E Desa
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Hajim School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York, USA
| | - Robert L Strawderman
- Department of Biostatistics and Computational Biology, School of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York, USA
| | - Wencheng Wu
- Goergen Institute for Data Science, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York, USA
| | | | - Marcel Smid
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - J W M Martens
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Bradley M Turner
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, School of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York, USA
| | - Edward B Brown
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Hajim School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Coebergh van den Braak RRJ, Ten Hoorn S, Sieuwerts AM, Tuynman JB, Smid M, Wilting SM, Martens JWM, Punt CJA, Foekens JA, Medema JP, IJzermans JNM, Vermeulen L. Interconnectivity between molecular subtypes and tumor stage in colorectal cancer. BMC Cancer 2020; 20:850. [PMID: 32887573 PMCID: PMC7473811 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-020-07316-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2020] [Accepted: 08/18/2020] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND There are profound individual differences in clinical outcomes between colorectal cancers (CRCs) presenting with identical stage of disease. Molecular stratification, in conjunction with the traditional TNM staging, is a promising way to predict patient outcomes. We investigated the interconnectivity between tumor stage and tumor biology reflected by the Consensus Molecular Subtypes (CMSs) in CRC, and explored the possible value of these insights in patients with stage II colon cancer. METHODS We performed a retrospective analysis using clinical records and gene expression profiling in a meta-cohort of 1040 CRC patients. The interconnectivity of tumor biology and disease stage was assessed by investigating the association between CMSs and TNM classification. In order to validate the clinical applicability of our findings we employed a meta-cohort of 197 stage II colon cancers. RESULTS CMS4 was significantly more prevalent in advanced stages of disease (stage I 9.8% versus stage IV 38.5%, p < 0.001). The observed differential gene expression between cancer stages is at least partly explained by the biological differences as reflected by CMS subtypes. Gene signatures for stage III-IV and CMS4 were highly correlated (r = 0.77, p < 0.001). CMS4 cancers showed an increased progression rate to more advanced stages (CMS4 compared to CMS2: 1.25, 95% CI: 1.08-1.46). Patients with a CMS4 cancer had worse survival in the high-risk stage II tumors compared to the total stage II cohort (5-year DFS 41.7% versus 100.0%, p = 0.008). CONCLUSIONS Considerable interconnectivity between tumor biology and tumor stage in CRC exists. This implies that the TNM stage, in addition to the stage of progression, might also reflect distinct biological disease entities. These insights can potentially be utilized to optimize identification of high-risk stage II colon cancers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R R J Coebergh van den Braak
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, 's Gravendijkwal 230, 3015 CE, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - S Ten Hoorn
- Laboratory for Experimental Oncology and Radiobiology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam and Cancer Center Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Oncode Institute, Amsterdam UMC, Meibergdreef 9, 1105AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - A M Sieuwerts
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Wytemaweg 80, 3015 CN, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.,Cancer Genomics Center Netherlands, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - J B Tuynman
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - M Smid
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Wytemaweg 80, 3015 CN, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - S M Wilting
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Wytemaweg 80, 3015 CN, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - J W M Martens
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Wytemaweg 80, 3015 CN, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.,Cancer Genomics Center Netherlands, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - C J A Punt
- Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Universiteitsweg 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - J A Foekens
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Wytemaweg 80, 3015 CN, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - J P Medema
- Laboratory for Experimental Oncology and Radiobiology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam and Cancer Center Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Oncode Institute, Amsterdam UMC, Meibergdreef 9, 1105AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - J N M IJzermans
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, 's Gravendijkwal 230, 3015 CE, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - L Vermeulen
- Laboratory for Experimental Oncology and Radiobiology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam and Cancer Center Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. .,Oncode Institute, Amsterdam UMC, Meibergdreef 9, 1105AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Eslami Amirabadi H, Tuerlings M, Hollestelle A, SahebAli S, Luttge R, van Donkelaar CC, Martens JWM, den Toonder JMJ. Characterizing the invasion of different breast cancer cell lines with distinct E-cadherin status in 3D using a microfluidic system. Biomed Microdevices 2019; 21:101. [PMID: 31760501 PMCID: PMC6875428 DOI: 10.1007/s10544-019-0450-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/17/2023]
Abstract
E-cadherin is a cell-cell adhesion protein that plays a prominent role in cancer invasion. Inactivation of E-cadherin in breast cancer can arise from gene promoter hypermethylation or genetic mutation. Depending on their E-cadherin status, breast cancer cells adopt different morphologies with distinct invasion modes. The tumor microenvironment (TME) can also affect the cell morphology and invasion mode. In this paper, we used a previously developed microfluidic system to quantify the three-dimensional invasion of breast cancer cells with different E-cadherin status, namely MCF-7, CAMA-1 and MDA-MB-231 with wild type, mutated and promoter hypermethylated E-cadherin, respectively. The cells migrated into a stable and reproducible microfibrous polycaprolactone mesh in the chip under a programmed stable chemotactic gradient. We observed that the MDA-MB-231 cells invaded the most, as single cells. MCF-7 cells collectively invaded into the matrix more than CAMA-1 cells, maintaining their E-cadherin expression. The CAMA-1 cells exhibited multicellular multifocal infiltration into the matrix. These results are consistent with what is seen in vivo in the cancer biology literature. In addition, comparison between complete serum and serum gradient conditions showed that the MDA-MB-231 cells invaded more under the serum gradient after one day, however this behavior was inverted after 3 days. The results showcase that the microfluidic system can be used to quantitatively assess the invasion behavior of cancer cells with different E-cadherin expression, for a longer period than conventional invasion models. In the future, it can be used to quantitatively investigate effects of matrix structure and cell treatments on cancer invasion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- H Eslami Amirabadi
- Microsystems group, Department of Mechanical Engineering and Institute for Complex Molecular Systems (ICMS), Eindhoven University of Technology, Groene Loper 15, 5612AZ, Eindhoven, the Netherlands
- Healthy living division, TNO, Zeist, the Netherlands
- Institute for Pharmeceutical Sciences, Department of Pharmacology, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - M Tuerlings
- Microsystems group, Department of Mechanical Engineering and Institute for Complex Molecular Systems (ICMS), Eindhoven University of Technology, Groene Loper 15, 5612AZ, Eindhoven, the Netherlands
- Orthopaedic Biomechanics group, Department of Biomedical Engineering and Institute for Complex Molecular Systems (ICMS), Eindhoven University of Technology, Groene Loper 15, 5612AZ, Eindhoven, the Netherlands
| | - A Hollestelle
- Department of Medical oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - S SahebAli
- Microsystems group, Department of Mechanical Engineering and Institute for Complex Molecular Systems (ICMS), Eindhoven University of Technology, Groene Loper 15, 5612AZ, Eindhoven, the Netherlands
| | - R Luttge
- Microsystems group, Department of Mechanical Engineering and Institute for Complex Molecular Systems (ICMS), Eindhoven University of Technology, Groene Loper 15, 5612AZ, Eindhoven, the Netherlands
| | - C C van Donkelaar
- Orthopaedic Biomechanics group, Department of Biomedical Engineering and Institute for Complex Molecular Systems (ICMS), Eindhoven University of Technology, Groene Loper 15, 5612AZ, Eindhoven, the Netherlands
| | - J W M Martens
- Department of Medical oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - J M J den Toonder
- Microsystems group, Department of Mechanical Engineering and Institute for Complex Molecular Systems (ICMS), Eindhoven University of Technology, Groene Loper 15, 5612AZ, Eindhoven, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Uhr K, Sieuwerts AM, de Weerd V, Smid M, Hammerl D, Foekens JA, Martens JWM. Association of microRNA-7 and its binding partner CDR1-AS with the prognosis and prediction of 1 st-line tamoxifen therapy in breast cancer. Sci Rep 2018; 8:9657. [PMID: 29941867 PMCID: PMC6018428 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-27987-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2018] [Accepted: 06/12/2018] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
The large number of non-coding RNAs (ncRNAs) and their breadth of functionalities has fuelled many studies on their roles in cancer. We previously linked four microRNAs to breast cancer prognosis. One of these microRNAs, hsa-miR-7, was found to be regulated by another type of ncRNA, the circular non-coding RNA (circRNA) CDR1-AS, which contains multiple hsa-miR-7 binding sites. Based on this finding, we studied the potential clinical value of this circRNA on breast cancer prognosis in a cohort based on a cohort that was previously analysed for hsa-miR-7 and in an adjuvant hormone-naïve cohort for 1st-line tamoxifen treatment outcomes, in which we also analysed hsa-miR-7. A negative correlation was observed between hsa-miR-7 and CDR1-AS in both cohorts. Despite associations with various clinical metrics (e.g., tumour grade, tumour size, and relapse location), CDR1-AS was neither prognostic nor predictive of relevant outcomes in our cohorts. However, we did observe stromal CDR1-AS expression, suggesting a possible cell-type specific interaction. Next to the known association of hsa-miR-7 expression with poor prognosis in primary breast cancer, we found that high hsa-miR-7 expression was predictive of an adverse response to tamoxifen therapy and poor progression-free and post-relapse overall survival in patients with recurrent disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K Uhr
- Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Department of Medical Oncology and Cancer Genomics, Wytemaweg 80, 3015 CN, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - A M Sieuwerts
- Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Department of Medical Oncology and Cancer Genomics, Wytemaweg 80, 3015 CN, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - V de Weerd
- Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Department of Medical Oncology and Cancer Genomics, Wytemaweg 80, 3015 CN, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - M Smid
- Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Department of Medical Oncology and Cancer Genomics, Wytemaweg 80, 3015 CN, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - D Hammerl
- Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Department of Medical Oncology and Cancer Genomics, Wytemaweg 80, 3015 CN, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - J A Foekens
- Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Department of Medical Oncology and Cancer Genomics, Wytemaweg 80, 3015 CN, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - J W M Martens
- Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Department of Medical Oncology and Cancer Genomics, Wytemaweg 80, 3015 CN, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Paepke S, Wilhelm OG, Schmitt M, Noske A, Schricker G, Napieralski R, Vetter M, Thomssen C, Perkins J, Lauber J, Ulm K, Martens JWM, Weichert W, Kiechle M. PITX2 DNA-Methylierung: Erster klinisch validierter prädiktiver Marker zur Vorhersage des Ansprechens auf anthrazyklin-basierte Chemotherapie bei Brustkrebspatientinnen mit hohem Rezidivrisiko. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2018. [DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1655534] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/28/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- S Paepke
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Frauenheilkunde/Institut für Pathologie, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Comprehensive Cancer Center; Qiagen GmbH, Hilden und Therawis Diagnostics GmbH München, Deutschland
| | - OG Wilhelm
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Frauenheilkunde/Institut für Pathologie, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Comprehensive Cancer Center; Qiagen GmbH, Hilden und Therawis Diagnostics GmbH München, Deutschland
| | - M Schmitt
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Frauenheilkunde/Institut für Pathologie, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Comprehensive Cancer Center; Qiagen GmbH, Hilden und Therawis Diagnostics GmbH München, Deutschland
| | - A Noske
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Frauenheilkunde/Institut für Pathologie, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Comprehensive Cancer Center; Qiagen GmbH, Hilden und Therawis Diagnostics GmbH München, Deutschland
| | - G Schricker
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Frauenheilkunde/Institut für Pathologie, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Comprehensive Cancer Center; Qiagen GmbH, Hilden und Therawis Diagnostics GmbH München, Deutschland
| | - R Napieralski
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Frauenheilkunde/Institut für Pathologie, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Comprehensive Cancer Center; Qiagen GmbH, Hilden und Therawis Diagnostics GmbH München, Deutschland
| | - M Vetter
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Frauenheilkunde/Institut für Pathologie, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Comprehensive Cancer Center; Qiagen GmbH, Hilden und Therawis Diagnostics GmbH München, Deutschland
| | - C Thomssen
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Frauenheilkunde/Institut für Pathologie, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Comprehensive Cancer Center; Qiagen GmbH, Hilden und Therawis Diagnostics GmbH München, Deutschland
| | - J Perkins
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Frauenheilkunde/Institut für Pathologie, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Comprehensive Cancer Center; Qiagen GmbH, Hilden und Therawis Diagnostics GmbH München, Deutschland
| | - J Lauber
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Frauenheilkunde/Institut für Pathologie, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Comprehensive Cancer Center; Qiagen GmbH, Hilden und Therawis Diagnostics GmbH München, Deutschland
| | - K Ulm
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Frauenheilkunde/Institut für Pathologie, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Comprehensive Cancer Center; Qiagen GmbH, Hilden und Therawis Diagnostics GmbH München, Deutschland
| | - JWM Martens
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Frauenheilkunde/Institut für Pathologie, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Comprehensive Cancer Center; Qiagen GmbH, Hilden und Therawis Diagnostics GmbH München, Deutschland
| | - W Weichert
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Frauenheilkunde/Institut für Pathologie, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Comprehensive Cancer Center; Qiagen GmbH, Hilden und Therawis Diagnostics GmbH München, Deutschland
| | - M Kiechle
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Frauenheilkunde/Institut für Pathologie, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Comprehensive Cancer Center; Qiagen GmbH, Hilden und Therawis Diagnostics GmbH München, Deutschland
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Weerts MJA, Timmermans EC, van de Stolpe A, Vossen RHAM, Anvar SY, Foekens JA, Sleijfer S, Martens JWM. Tumor-Specific Mitochondrial DNA Variants Are Rarely Detected in Cell-Free DNA. Neoplasia 2018; 20:687-696. [PMID: 29842994 PMCID: PMC6030393 DOI: 10.1016/j.neo.2018.05.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2018] [Revised: 05/07/2018] [Accepted: 05/08/2018] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
The use of blood-circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) as a “liquid biopsy” in oncology is being explored for its potential as a cancer biomarker. Mitochondria contain their own circular genomic entity (mitochondrial DNA, mtDNA), up to even thousands of copies per cell. The mutation rate of mtDNA is several orders of magnitude higher than that of the nuclear DNA. Tumor-specific variants have been identified in tumors along the entire mtDNA, and their number varies among and within tumors. The high mtDNA copy number per cell and the high mtDNA mutation rate make it worthwhile to explore the potential of tumor-specific cf-mtDNA variants as cancer marker in the blood of cancer patients. We used single-molecule real-time (SMRT) sequencing to profile the entire mtDNA of 19 tissue specimens (primary tumor and/or metastatic sites, and tumor-adjacent normal tissue) and 9 cfDNA samples, originating from 8 cancer patients (5 breast, 3 colon). For each patient, tumor-specific mtDNA variants were detected and traced in cfDNA by SMRT sequencing and/or digital PCR to explore their feasibility as cancer biomarker. As a reference, we measured other blood-circulating biomarkers for these patients, including driver mutations in nuclear-encoded cfDNA and cancer-antigen levels or circulating tumor cells. Four of the 24 (17%) tumor-specific mtDNA variants were detected in cfDNA, however at much lower allele frequencies compared to mutations in nuclear-encoded driver genes in the same samples. Also, extensive heterogeneity was observed among the heteroplasmic mtDNA variants present in an individual. We conclude that there is limited value in tracing tumor-specific mtDNA variants in blood-circulating cfDNA with the current methods available.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M J A Weerts
- Department of Medical Oncology and Cancer Genomics Netherlands, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - E C Timmermans
- Philips Research Laboratories, High Tech Campus 11, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - A van de Stolpe
- Philips Research Laboratories, High Tech Campus 11, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - R H A M Vossen
- Leiden Genome Technology Center (LGTC), Department of Human Genetics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - S Y Anvar
- Leiden Genome Technology Center (LGTC), Department of Human Genetics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands; Department of Human Genetics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands; Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Toxicology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - J A Foekens
- Department of Medical Oncology and Cancer Genomics Netherlands, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - S Sleijfer
- Department of Medical Oncology and Cancer Genomics Netherlands, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - J W M Martens
- Department of Medical Oncology and Cancer Genomics Netherlands, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Martens JWM, Sieuwerts A, Ponchet C, Smid M, de Weerd V, Slaets L, Piper T, van Deurzen CHM, Schroder CP, Stangle C, Kloosterman W, van Leeuwen-Stok E, Nilsson C, Vermeij J, Peeters S, Goulioti T, Nowaczyk M, Aebi S, Rubio IT, Kelly C, Bayani J, Porter P, Murray M, Hudis C, Middleton L, Korde L, Ruddy K, Winer E, Bogler O, van den Weyngaert D, dal Lago L, Fraser J, Benstead K, van Asperen C, Linderholm B, Hedenfalk I, Tryfonidis K, Giordano S, Bartlett J, Cardoso F. Abstract PD7-12: Molecular subtyping of male breast cancer by the International male breast cancer program (IMBC): EORTC 10085/TBCRC 0-29/BIG 2-07/NABCG/BOOG 2009-04. Cancer Res 2018. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs17-pd7-12] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Introduction. Male breast cancer (male BC) is a rare disease for which disease management is extrapolated from females. IMBC, an international consortium, which previously reported on clinico-pathological aspects, now reports on molecular subgroups revealed by RNA sequencing and their relation to patient outcome.
Methods. Tumor samples from the retrospective MALE BC registry diagnosed between 1990-2010 and with pathology and outcome data (relapse-free- (RFS) and overall survival (OS)) were included (n=699). To allow the discovery of prognostic features, we selected, stratified for known risk factors (TN stage, grade, age at diagnose and adjuvant endocrine treatment), from the cohort 152 cases with poor (RFS <= 4 yrs) and good outcome (RFS > 7yrs) evenly distributed. Here, we report RNA sequencing results of the first 73 cases, 38 with poor and 35 with good outcome. RNA sequencing reads were used to generate gene expression values and to report transcripts carrying driver mutations. Unsupervised clustering identified subgroups and within subgroups differentially expressed genes were identified. The reported prognostic male BC subgroups M1 and M2 (Johansson BCR 2012(14):R31) were also annotated. All identified subgroups were related to outcome using logistic regression (p-value using Wald test).
Results. Unsupervised clustering revealed 2 main subgroups of which group 1 was enriched for expression of ER target genes, WNT3 and genes from amplicons known for female BC, e.g. 19p13 (CCNE1), 8q24 (MYC), and 11q13 (CCND1). The biology of the smaller group 2 was less defined but TGFβ2 expression was high as were various kallikreins (KLK) including interestingly KLK3 (prostate specific antigen). Other known amplified regions [(8p11 (FGFR1), 20q13 (ZNF217) and 12q15 (MDM2)] and mutated transcripts [PIK3CA (H1047R/L/Q; E542K, E545K, N345K; 16% of cases), TP53 and SF3B1 (K700E) (2% of cases)] were identified. Profound tumor infiltrate gene expression was present in 5% of cases and one third of cases expressed proliferation markers. Except for TP53, none of these latter characteristics were unevenly distributed among the 2 main subgroups. ER and AR were highly correlated, particularly in group 1. The two main groups could be further subdivided. Group 1 comprised 3 subgroups of which subgroup 1a expressed TFF1/3 and NAT1, well-known ER targets, while subgroups 1b and 1c expressed other ER targets,respectively BEX1 and PITX1. HOXC cluster expression differentiated subgroup 1b from 1a and 1c. None of these intrinsic subgroups were, however, related to RFS. The previously reported M2 subgroup, which largely segregated with subclusters 1a and 1b, was associated with a better RFS than the M1 subgroup (OR=2.9; 95%CI 1.1-7.5; p-value=0.03).
Conclusions. 1) Intrinsic subtypes of male BC were revealed and their subgrouping is defined by ER associated subsets of genes. 2) The association of the reported M2 subgroup of male BC with longer RFS was validated; 3) Currently identified biological characteristics of male BC may improve future treatments. The full report on 152 cases including a comparison to female BC will be presented at the conference.
This research was funded by Breast Cancer Research Foundation
Citation Format: Martens JWM, Sieuwerts A, Ponchet C, Smid M, de Weerd V, Slaets L, Piper T, van Deurzen CHM, Schroder CP, Stangle C, Kloosterman W, van Leeuwen-Stok E, Nilsson C, Vermeij J, Peeters S, Goulioti T, Nowaczyk M, Aebi S, Rubio IT, Kelly C, Bayani J, Porter P, Murray M, Hudis C, Middleton L, Korde L, Ruddy K, Winer E, Bogler O, van den Weyngaert D, dal Lago L, Fraser J, Benstead K, van Asperen C, Linderholm B, Hedenfalk I, Tryfonidis K, Giordano S, Bartlett J, Cardoso F. Molecular subtyping of male breast cancer by the International male breast cancer program (IMBC): EORTC 10085/TBCRC 0-29/BIG 2-07/NABCG/BOOG 2009-04 [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2017 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2017 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PD7-12.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- JWM Martens
- Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, ZH, Netherlands; European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, Brussels, Belgium; Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Canada; Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands; University Medical Center, Groningen, Netherlands; University Medical Center, Utrecht, Netherlands; Dutch Breast Cancer Research Group (BOOG), Netherlands; Västmanlands Hospital, Vateras, Sweden; ZNA Jan Palfijn, Belgium; UZ Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Breast International Group, Brussels, Belgium; Specialist Hospital. St. Wojciech, Gdansk, Poland; Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research, Switzerland; Hospital Universitario Vall d´Hebron, Barcelona, Spain; All Ireland Cooperative Oncology Research Group, Ireland; University of Washington, Seattle; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York; University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston; Mayo Clinic, Rochester; Dana-Farber Cancer Ins
| | - A Sieuwerts
- Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, ZH, Netherlands; European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, Brussels, Belgium; Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Canada; Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands; University Medical Center, Groningen, Netherlands; University Medical Center, Utrecht, Netherlands; Dutch Breast Cancer Research Group (BOOG), Netherlands; Västmanlands Hospital, Vateras, Sweden; ZNA Jan Palfijn, Belgium; UZ Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Breast International Group, Brussels, Belgium; Specialist Hospital. St. Wojciech, Gdansk, Poland; Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research, Switzerland; Hospital Universitario Vall d´Hebron, Barcelona, Spain; All Ireland Cooperative Oncology Research Group, Ireland; University of Washington, Seattle; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York; University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston; Mayo Clinic, Rochester; Dana-Farber Cancer Ins
| | - C Ponchet
- Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, ZH, Netherlands; European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, Brussels, Belgium; Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Canada; Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands; University Medical Center, Groningen, Netherlands; University Medical Center, Utrecht, Netherlands; Dutch Breast Cancer Research Group (BOOG), Netherlands; Västmanlands Hospital, Vateras, Sweden; ZNA Jan Palfijn, Belgium; UZ Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Breast International Group, Brussels, Belgium; Specialist Hospital. St. Wojciech, Gdansk, Poland; Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research, Switzerland; Hospital Universitario Vall d´Hebron, Barcelona, Spain; All Ireland Cooperative Oncology Research Group, Ireland; University of Washington, Seattle; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York; University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston; Mayo Clinic, Rochester; Dana-Farber Cancer Ins
| | - M Smid
- Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, ZH, Netherlands; European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, Brussels, Belgium; Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Canada; Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands; University Medical Center, Groningen, Netherlands; University Medical Center, Utrecht, Netherlands; Dutch Breast Cancer Research Group (BOOG), Netherlands; Västmanlands Hospital, Vateras, Sweden; ZNA Jan Palfijn, Belgium; UZ Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Breast International Group, Brussels, Belgium; Specialist Hospital. St. Wojciech, Gdansk, Poland; Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research, Switzerland; Hospital Universitario Vall d´Hebron, Barcelona, Spain; All Ireland Cooperative Oncology Research Group, Ireland; University of Washington, Seattle; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York; University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston; Mayo Clinic, Rochester; Dana-Farber Cancer Ins
| | - V de Weerd
- Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, ZH, Netherlands; European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, Brussels, Belgium; Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Canada; Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands; University Medical Center, Groningen, Netherlands; University Medical Center, Utrecht, Netherlands; Dutch Breast Cancer Research Group (BOOG), Netherlands; Västmanlands Hospital, Vateras, Sweden; ZNA Jan Palfijn, Belgium; UZ Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Breast International Group, Brussels, Belgium; Specialist Hospital. St. Wojciech, Gdansk, Poland; Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research, Switzerland; Hospital Universitario Vall d´Hebron, Barcelona, Spain; All Ireland Cooperative Oncology Research Group, Ireland; University of Washington, Seattle; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York; University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston; Mayo Clinic, Rochester; Dana-Farber Cancer Ins
| | - L Slaets
- Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, ZH, Netherlands; European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, Brussels, Belgium; Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Canada; Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands; University Medical Center, Groningen, Netherlands; University Medical Center, Utrecht, Netherlands; Dutch Breast Cancer Research Group (BOOG), Netherlands; Västmanlands Hospital, Vateras, Sweden; ZNA Jan Palfijn, Belgium; UZ Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Breast International Group, Brussels, Belgium; Specialist Hospital. St. Wojciech, Gdansk, Poland; Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research, Switzerland; Hospital Universitario Vall d´Hebron, Barcelona, Spain; All Ireland Cooperative Oncology Research Group, Ireland; University of Washington, Seattle; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York; University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston; Mayo Clinic, Rochester; Dana-Farber Cancer Ins
| | - T Piper
- Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, ZH, Netherlands; European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, Brussels, Belgium; Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Canada; Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands; University Medical Center, Groningen, Netherlands; University Medical Center, Utrecht, Netherlands; Dutch Breast Cancer Research Group (BOOG), Netherlands; Västmanlands Hospital, Vateras, Sweden; ZNA Jan Palfijn, Belgium; UZ Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Breast International Group, Brussels, Belgium; Specialist Hospital. St. Wojciech, Gdansk, Poland; Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research, Switzerland; Hospital Universitario Vall d´Hebron, Barcelona, Spain; All Ireland Cooperative Oncology Research Group, Ireland; University of Washington, Seattle; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York; University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston; Mayo Clinic, Rochester; Dana-Farber Cancer Ins
| | - CHM van Deurzen
- Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, ZH, Netherlands; European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, Brussels, Belgium; Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Canada; Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands; University Medical Center, Groningen, Netherlands; University Medical Center, Utrecht, Netherlands; Dutch Breast Cancer Research Group (BOOG), Netherlands; Västmanlands Hospital, Vateras, Sweden; ZNA Jan Palfijn, Belgium; UZ Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Breast International Group, Brussels, Belgium; Specialist Hospital. St. Wojciech, Gdansk, Poland; Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research, Switzerland; Hospital Universitario Vall d´Hebron, Barcelona, Spain; All Ireland Cooperative Oncology Research Group, Ireland; University of Washington, Seattle; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York; University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston; Mayo Clinic, Rochester; Dana-Farber Cancer Ins
| | - CP Schroder
- Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, ZH, Netherlands; European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, Brussels, Belgium; Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Canada; Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands; University Medical Center, Groningen, Netherlands; University Medical Center, Utrecht, Netherlands; Dutch Breast Cancer Research Group (BOOG), Netherlands; Västmanlands Hospital, Vateras, Sweden; ZNA Jan Palfijn, Belgium; UZ Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Breast International Group, Brussels, Belgium; Specialist Hospital. St. Wojciech, Gdansk, Poland; Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research, Switzerland; Hospital Universitario Vall d´Hebron, Barcelona, Spain; All Ireland Cooperative Oncology Research Group, Ireland; University of Washington, Seattle; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York; University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston; Mayo Clinic, Rochester; Dana-Farber Cancer Ins
| | - C Stangle
- Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, ZH, Netherlands; European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, Brussels, Belgium; Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Canada; Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands; University Medical Center, Groningen, Netherlands; University Medical Center, Utrecht, Netherlands; Dutch Breast Cancer Research Group (BOOG), Netherlands; Västmanlands Hospital, Vateras, Sweden; ZNA Jan Palfijn, Belgium; UZ Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Breast International Group, Brussels, Belgium; Specialist Hospital. St. Wojciech, Gdansk, Poland; Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research, Switzerland; Hospital Universitario Vall d´Hebron, Barcelona, Spain; All Ireland Cooperative Oncology Research Group, Ireland; University of Washington, Seattle; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York; University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston; Mayo Clinic, Rochester; Dana-Farber Cancer Ins
| | - W Kloosterman
- Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, ZH, Netherlands; European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, Brussels, Belgium; Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Canada; Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands; University Medical Center, Groningen, Netherlands; University Medical Center, Utrecht, Netherlands; Dutch Breast Cancer Research Group (BOOG), Netherlands; Västmanlands Hospital, Vateras, Sweden; ZNA Jan Palfijn, Belgium; UZ Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Breast International Group, Brussels, Belgium; Specialist Hospital. St. Wojciech, Gdansk, Poland; Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research, Switzerland; Hospital Universitario Vall d´Hebron, Barcelona, Spain; All Ireland Cooperative Oncology Research Group, Ireland; University of Washington, Seattle; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York; University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston; Mayo Clinic, Rochester; Dana-Farber Cancer Ins
| | - E van Leeuwen-Stok
- Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, ZH, Netherlands; European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, Brussels, Belgium; Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Canada; Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands; University Medical Center, Groningen, Netherlands; University Medical Center, Utrecht, Netherlands; Dutch Breast Cancer Research Group (BOOG), Netherlands; Västmanlands Hospital, Vateras, Sweden; ZNA Jan Palfijn, Belgium; UZ Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Breast International Group, Brussels, Belgium; Specialist Hospital. St. Wojciech, Gdansk, Poland; Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research, Switzerland; Hospital Universitario Vall d´Hebron, Barcelona, Spain; All Ireland Cooperative Oncology Research Group, Ireland; University of Washington, Seattle; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York; University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston; Mayo Clinic, Rochester; Dana-Farber Cancer Ins
| | - C Nilsson
- Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, ZH, Netherlands; European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, Brussels, Belgium; Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Canada; Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands; University Medical Center, Groningen, Netherlands; University Medical Center, Utrecht, Netherlands; Dutch Breast Cancer Research Group (BOOG), Netherlands; Västmanlands Hospital, Vateras, Sweden; ZNA Jan Palfijn, Belgium; UZ Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Breast International Group, Brussels, Belgium; Specialist Hospital. St. Wojciech, Gdansk, Poland; Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research, Switzerland; Hospital Universitario Vall d´Hebron, Barcelona, Spain; All Ireland Cooperative Oncology Research Group, Ireland; University of Washington, Seattle; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York; University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston; Mayo Clinic, Rochester; Dana-Farber Cancer Ins
| | - J Vermeij
- Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, ZH, Netherlands; European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, Brussels, Belgium; Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Canada; Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands; University Medical Center, Groningen, Netherlands; University Medical Center, Utrecht, Netherlands; Dutch Breast Cancer Research Group (BOOG), Netherlands; Västmanlands Hospital, Vateras, Sweden; ZNA Jan Palfijn, Belgium; UZ Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Breast International Group, Brussels, Belgium; Specialist Hospital. St. Wojciech, Gdansk, Poland; Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research, Switzerland; Hospital Universitario Vall d´Hebron, Barcelona, Spain; All Ireland Cooperative Oncology Research Group, Ireland; University of Washington, Seattle; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York; University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston; Mayo Clinic, Rochester; Dana-Farber Cancer Ins
| | - S Peeters
- Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, ZH, Netherlands; European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, Brussels, Belgium; Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Canada; Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands; University Medical Center, Groningen, Netherlands; University Medical Center, Utrecht, Netherlands; Dutch Breast Cancer Research Group (BOOG), Netherlands; Västmanlands Hospital, Vateras, Sweden; ZNA Jan Palfijn, Belgium; UZ Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Breast International Group, Brussels, Belgium; Specialist Hospital. St. Wojciech, Gdansk, Poland; Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research, Switzerland; Hospital Universitario Vall d´Hebron, Barcelona, Spain; All Ireland Cooperative Oncology Research Group, Ireland; University of Washington, Seattle; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York; University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston; Mayo Clinic, Rochester; Dana-Farber Cancer Ins
| | - T Goulioti
- Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, ZH, Netherlands; European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, Brussels, Belgium; Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Canada; Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands; University Medical Center, Groningen, Netherlands; University Medical Center, Utrecht, Netherlands; Dutch Breast Cancer Research Group (BOOG), Netherlands; Västmanlands Hospital, Vateras, Sweden; ZNA Jan Palfijn, Belgium; UZ Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Breast International Group, Brussels, Belgium; Specialist Hospital. St. Wojciech, Gdansk, Poland; Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research, Switzerland; Hospital Universitario Vall d´Hebron, Barcelona, Spain; All Ireland Cooperative Oncology Research Group, Ireland; University of Washington, Seattle; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York; University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston; Mayo Clinic, Rochester; Dana-Farber Cancer Ins
| | - M Nowaczyk
- Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, ZH, Netherlands; European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, Brussels, Belgium; Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Canada; Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands; University Medical Center, Groningen, Netherlands; University Medical Center, Utrecht, Netherlands; Dutch Breast Cancer Research Group (BOOG), Netherlands; Västmanlands Hospital, Vateras, Sweden; ZNA Jan Palfijn, Belgium; UZ Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Breast International Group, Brussels, Belgium; Specialist Hospital. St. Wojciech, Gdansk, Poland; Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research, Switzerland; Hospital Universitario Vall d´Hebron, Barcelona, Spain; All Ireland Cooperative Oncology Research Group, Ireland; University of Washington, Seattle; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York; University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston; Mayo Clinic, Rochester; Dana-Farber Cancer Ins
| | - S Aebi
- Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, ZH, Netherlands; European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, Brussels, Belgium; Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Canada; Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands; University Medical Center, Groningen, Netherlands; University Medical Center, Utrecht, Netherlands; Dutch Breast Cancer Research Group (BOOG), Netherlands; Västmanlands Hospital, Vateras, Sweden; ZNA Jan Palfijn, Belgium; UZ Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Breast International Group, Brussels, Belgium; Specialist Hospital. St. Wojciech, Gdansk, Poland; Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research, Switzerland; Hospital Universitario Vall d´Hebron, Barcelona, Spain; All Ireland Cooperative Oncology Research Group, Ireland; University of Washington, Seattle; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York; University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston; Mayo Clinic, Rochester; Dana-Farber Cancer Ins
| | - IT Rubio
- Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, ZH, Netherlands; European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, Brussels, Belgium; Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Canada; Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands; University Medical Center, Groningen, Netherlands; University Medical Center, Utrecht, Netherlands; Dutch Breast Cancer Research Group (BOOG), Netherlands; Västmanlands Hospital, Vateras, Sweden; ZNA Jan Palfijn, Belgium; UZ Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Breast International Group, Brussels, Belgium; Specialist Hospital. St. Wojciech, Gdansk, Poland; Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research, Switzerland; Hospital Universitario Vall d´Hebron, Barcelona, Spain; All Ireland Cooperative Oncology Research Group, Ireland; University of Washington, Seattle; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York; University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston; Mayo Clinic, Rochester; Dana-Farber Cancer Ins
| | - C Kelly
- Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, ZH, Netherlands; European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, Brussels, Belgium; Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Canada; Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands; University Medical Center, Groningen, Netherlands; University Medical Center, Utrecht, Netherlands; Dutch Breast Cancer Research Group (BOOG), Netherlands; Västmanlands Hospital, Vateras, Sweden; ZNA Jan Palfijn, Belgium; UZ Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Breast International Group, Brussels, Belgium; Specialist Hospital. St. Wojciech, Gdansk, Poland; Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research, Switzerland; Hospital Universitario Vall d´Hebron, Barcelona, Spain; All Ireland Cooperative Oncology Research Group, Ireland; University of Washington, Seattle; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York; University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston; Mayo Clinic, Rochester; Dana-Farber Cancer Ins
| | - J Bayani
- Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, ZH, Netherlands; European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, Brussels, Belgium; Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Canada; Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands; University Medical Center, Groningen, Netherlands; University Medical Center, Utrecht, Netherlands; Dutch Breast Cancer Research Group (BOOG), Netherlands; Västmanlands Hospital, Vateras, Sweden; ZNA Jan Palfijn, Belgium; UZ Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Breast International Group, Brussels, Belgium; Specialist Hospital. St. Wojciech, Gdansk, Poland; Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research, Switzerland; Hospital Universitario Vall d´Hebron, Barcelona, Spain; All Ireland Cooperative Oncology Research Group, Ireland; University of Washington, Seattle; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York; University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston; Mayo Clinic, Rochester; Dana-Farber Cancer Ins
| | - P Porter
- Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, ZH, Netherlands; European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, Brussels, Belgium; Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Canada; Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands; University Medical Center, Groningen, Netherlands; University Medical Center, Utrecht, Netherlands; Dutch Breast Cancer Research Group (BOOG), Netherlands; Västmanlands Hospital, Vateras, Sweden; ZNA Jan Palfijn, Belgium; UZ Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Breast International Group, Brussels, Belgium; Specialist Hospital. St. Wojciech, Gdansk, Poland; Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research, Switzerland; Hospital Universitario Vall d´Hebron, Barcelona, Spain; All Ireland Cooperative Oncology Research Group, Ireland; University of Washington, Seattle; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York; University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston; Mayo Clinic, Rochester; Dana-Farber Cancer Ins
| | - M Murray
- Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, ZH, Netherlands; European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, Brussels, Belgium; Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Canada; Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands; University Medical Center, Groningen, Netherlands; University Medical Center, Utrecht, Netherlands; Dutch Breast Cancer Research Group (BOOG), Netherlands; Västmanlands Hospital, Vateras, Sweden; ZNA Jan Palfijn, Belgium; UZ Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Breast International Group, Brussels, Belgium; Specialist Hospital. St. Wojciech, Gdansk, Poland; Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research, Switzerland; Hospital Universitario Vall d´Hebron, Barcelona, Spain; All Ireland Cooperative Oncology Research Group, Ireland; University of Washington, Seattle; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York; University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston; Mayo Clinic, Rochester; Dana-Farber Cancer Ins
| | - C Hudis
- Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, ZH, Netherlands; European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, Brussels, Belgium; Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Canada; Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands; University Medical Center, Groningen, Netherlands; University Medical Center, Utrecht, Netherlands; Dutch Breast Cancer Research Group (BOOG), Netherlands; Västmanlands Hospital, Vateras, Sweden; ZNA Jan Palfijn, Belgium; UZ Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Breast International Group, Brussels, Belgium; Specialist Hospital. St. Wojciech, Gdansk, Poland; Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research, Switzerland; Hospital Universitario Vall d´Hebron, Barcelona, Spain; All Ireland Cooperative Oncology Research Group, Ireland; University of Washington, Seattle; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York; University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston; Mayo Clinic, Rochester; Dana-Farber Cancer Ins
| | - L Middleton
- Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, ZH, Netherlands; European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, Brussels, Belgium; Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Canada; Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands; University Medical Center, Groningen, Netherlands; University Medical Center, Utrecht, Netherlands; Dutch Breast Cancer Research Group (BOOG), Netherlands; Västmanlands Hospital, Vateras, Sweden; ZNA Jan Palfijn, Belgium; UZ Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Breast International Group, Brussels, Belgium; Specialist Hospital. St. Wojciech, Gdansk, Poland; Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research, Switzerland; Hospital Universitario Vall d´Hebron, Barcelona, Spain; All Ireland Cooperative Oncology Research Group, Ireland; University of Washington, Seattle; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York; University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston; Mayo Clinic, Rochester; Dana-Farber Cancer Ins
| | - L Korde
- Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, ZH, Netherlands; European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, Brussels, Belgium; Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Canada; Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands; University Medical Center, Groningen, Netherlands; University Medical Center, Utrecht, Netherlands; Dutch Breast Cancer Research Group (BOOG), Netherlands; Västmanlands Hospital, Vateras, Sweden; ZNA Jan Palfijn, Belgium; UZ Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Breast International Group, Brussels, Belgium; Specialist Hospital. St. Wojciech, Gdansk, Poland; Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research, Switzerland; Hospital Universitario Vall d´Hebron, Barcelona, Spain; All Ireland Cooperative Oncology Research Group, Ireland; University of Washington, Seattle; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York; University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston; Mayo Clinic, Rochester; Dana-Farber Cancer Ins
| | - K Ruddy
- Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, ZH, Netherlands; European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, Brussels, Belgium; Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Canada; Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands; University Medical Center, Groningen, Netherlands; University Medical Center, Utrecht, Netherlands; Dutch Breast Cancer Research Group (BOOG), Netherlands; Västmanlands Hospital, Vateras, Sweden; ZNA Jan Palfijn, Belgium; UZ Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Breast International Group, Brussels, Belgium; Specialist Hospital. St. Wojciech, Gdansk, Poland; Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research, Switzerland; Hospital Universitario Vall d´Hebron, Barcelona, Spain; All Ireland Cooperative Oncology Research Group, Ireland; University of Washington, Seattle; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York; University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston; Mayo Clinic, Rochester; Dana-Farber Cancer Ins
| | - E Winer
- Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, ZH, Netherlands; European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, Brussels, Belgium; Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Canada; Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands; University Medical Center, Groningen, Netherlands; University Medical Center, Utrecht, Netherlands; Dutch Breast Cancer Research Group (BOOG), Netherlands; Västmanlands Hospital, Vateras, Sweden; ZNA Jan Palfijn, Belgium; UZ Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Breast International Group, Brussels, Belgium; Specialist Hospital. St. Wojciech, Gdansk, Poland; Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research, Switzerland; Hospital Universitario Vall d´Hebron, Barcelona, Spain; All Ireland Cooperative Oncology Research Group, Ireland; University of Washington, Seattle; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York; University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston; Mayo Clinic, Rochester; Dana-Farber Cancer Ins
| | - O Bogler
- Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, ZH, Netherlands; European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, Brussels, Belgium; Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Canada; Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands; University Medical Center, Groningen, Netherlands; University Medical Center, Utrecht, Netherlands; Dutch Breast Cancer Research Group (BOOG), Netherlands; Västmanlands Hospital, Vateras, Sweden; ZNA Jan Palfijn, Belgium; UZ Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Breast International Group, Brussels, Belgium; Specialist Hospital. St. Wojciech, Gdansk, Poland; Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research, Switzerland; Hospital Universitario Vall d´Hebron, Barcelona, Spain; All Ireland Cooperative Oncology Research Group, Ireland; University of Washington, Seattle; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York; University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston; Mayo Clinic, Rochester; Dana-Farber Cancer Ins
| | - D van den Weyngaert
- Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, ZH, Netherlands; European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, Brussels, Belgium; Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Canada; Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands; University Medical Center, Groningen, Netherlands; University Medical Center, Utrecht, Netherlands; Dutch Breast Cancer Research Group (BOOG), Netherlands; Västmanlands Hospital, Vateras, Sweden; ZNA Jan Palfijn, Belgium; UZ Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Breast International Group, Brussels, Belgium; Specialist Hospital. St. Wojciech, Gdansk, Poland; Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research, Switzerland; Hospital Universitario Vall d´Hebron, Barcelona, Spain; All Ireland Cooperative Oncology Research Group, Ireland; University of Washington, Seattle; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York; University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston; Mayo Clinic, Rochester; Dana-Farber Cancer Ins
| | - L dal Lago
- Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, ZH, Netherlands; European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, Brussels, Belgium; Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Canada; Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands; University Medical Center, Groningen, Netherlands; University Medical Center, Utrecht, Netherlands; Dutch Breast Cancer Research Group (BOOG), Netherlands; Västmanlands Hospital, Vateras, Sweden; ZNA Jan Palfijn, Belgium; UZ Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Breast International Group, Brussels, Belgium; Specialist Hospital. St. Wojciech, Gdansk, Poland; Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research, Switzerland; Hospital Universitario Vall d´Hebron, Barcelona, Spain; All Ireland Cooperative Oncology Research Group, Ireland; University of Washington, Seattle; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York; University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston; Mayo Clinic, Rochester; Dana-Farber Cancer Ins
| | - J Fraser
- Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, ZH, Netherlands; European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, Brussels, Belgium; Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Canada; Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands; University Medical Center, Groningen, Netherlands; University Medical Center, Utrecht, Netherlands; Dutch Breast Cancer Research Group (BOOG), Netherlands; Västmanlands Hospital, Vateras, Sweden; ZNA Jan Palfijn, Belgium; UZ Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Breast International Group, Brussels, Belgium; Specialist Hospital. St. Wojciech, Gdansk, Poland; Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research, Switzerland; Hospital Universitario Vall d´Hebron, Barcelona, Spain; All Ireland Cooperative Oncology Research Group, Ireland; University of Washington, Seattle; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York; University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston; Mayo Clinic, Rochester; Dana-Farber Cancer Ins
| | - K Benstead
- Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, ZH, Netherlands; European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, Brussels, Belgium; Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Canada; Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands; University Medical Center, Groningen, Netherlands; University Medical Center, Utrecht, Netherlands; Dutch Breast Cancer Research Group (BOOG), Netherlands; Västmanlands Hospital, Vateras, Sweden; ZNA Jan Palfijn, Belgium; UZ Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Breast International Group, Brussels, Belgium; Specialist Hospital. St. Wojciech, Gdansk, Poland; Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research, Switzerland; Hospital Universitario Vall d´Hebron, Barcelona, Spain; All Ireland Cooperative Oncology Research Group, Ireland; University of Washington, Seattle; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York; University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston; Mayo Clinic, Rochester; Dana-Farber Cancer Ins
| | - C van Asperen
- Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, ZH, Netherlands; European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, Brussels, Belgium; Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Canada; Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands; University Medical Center, Groningen, Netherlands; University Medical Center, Utrecht, Netherlands; Dutch Breast Cancer Research Group (BOOG), Netherlands; Västmanlands Hospital, Vateras, Sweden; ZNA Jan Palfijn, Belgium; UZ Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Breast International Group, Brussels, Belgium; Specialist Hospital. St. Wojciech, Gdansk, Poland; Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research, Switzerland; Hospital Universitario Vall d´Hebron, Barcelona, Spain; All Ireland Cooperative Oncology Research Group, Ireland; University of Washington, Seattle; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York; University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston; Mayo Clinic, Rochester; Dana-Farber Cancer Ins
| | - B Linderholm
- Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, ZH, Netherlands; European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, Brussels, Belgium; Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Canada; Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands; University Medical Center, Groningen, Netherlands; University Medical Center, Utrecht, Netherlands; Dutch Breast Cancer Research Group (BOOG), Netherlands; Västmanlands Hospital, Vateras, Sweden; ZNA Jan Palfijn, Belgium; UZ Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Breast International Group, Brussels, Belgium; Specialist Hospital. St. Wojciech, Gdansk, Poland; Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research, Switzerland; Hospital Universitario Vall d´Hebron, Barcelona, Spain; All Ireland Cooperative Oncology Research Group, Ireland; University of Washington, Seattle; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York; University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston; Mayo Clinic, Rochester; Dana-Farber Cancer Ins
| | - I Hedenfalk
- Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, ZH, Netherlands; European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, Brussels, Belgium; Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Canada; Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands; University Medical Center, Groningen, Netherlands; University Medical Center, Utrecht, Netherlands; Dutch Breast Cancer Research Group (BOOG), Netherlands; Västmanlands Hospital, Vateras, Sweden; ZNA Jan Palfijn, Belgium; UZ Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Breast International Group, Brussels, Belgium; Specialist Hospital. St. Wojciech, Gdansk, Poland; Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research, Switzerland; Hospital Universitario Vall d´Hebron, Barcelona, Spain; All Ireland Cooperative Oncology Research Group, Ireland; University of Washington, Seattle; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York; University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston; Mayo Clinic, Rochester; Dana-Farber Cancer Ins
| | - K Tryfonidis
- Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, ZH, Netherlands; European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, Brussels, Belgium; Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Canada; Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands; University Medical Center, Groningen, Netherlands; University Medical Center, Utrecht, Netherlands; Dutch Breast Cancer Research Group (BOOG), Netherlands; Västmanlands Hospital, Vateras, Sweden; ZNA Jan Palfijn, Belgium; UZ Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Breast International Group, Brussels, Belgium; Specialist Hospital. St. Wojciech, Gdansk, Poland; Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research, Switzerland; Hospital Universitario Vall d´Hebron, Barcelona, Spain; All Ireland Cooperative Oncology Research Group, Ireland; University of Washington, Seattle; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York; University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston; Mayo Clinic, Rochester; Dana-Farber Cancer Ins
| | - S Giordano
- Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, ZH, Netherlands; European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, Brussels, Belgium; Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Canada; Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands; University Medical Center, Groningen, Netherlands; University Medical Center, Utrecht, Netherlands; Dutch Breast Cancer Research Group (BOOG), Netherlands; Västmanlands Hospital, Vateras, Sweden; ZNA Jan Palfijn, Belgium; UZ Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Breast International Group, Brussels, Belgium; Specialist Hospital. St. Wojciech, Gdansk, Poland; Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research, Switzerland; Hospital Universitario Vall d´Hebron, Barcelona, Spain; All Ireland Cooperative Oncology Research Group, Ireland; University of Washington, Seattle; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York; University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston; Mayo Clinic, Rochester; Dana-Farber Cancer Ins
| | - J Bartlett
- Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, ZH, Netherlands; European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, Brussels, Belgium; Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Canada; Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands; University Medical Center, Groningen, Netherlands; University Medical Center, Utrecht, Netherlands; Dutch Breast Cancer Research Group (BOOG), Netherlands; Västmanlands Hospital, Vateras, Sweden; ZNA Jan Palfijn, Belgium; UZ Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Breast International Group, Brussels, Belgium; Specialist Hospital. St. Wojciech, Gdansk, Poland; Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research, Switzerland; Hospital Universitario Vall d´Hebron, Barcelona, Spain; All Ireland Cooperative Oncology Research Group, Ireland; University of Washington, Seattle; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York; University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston; Mayo Clinic, Rochester; Dana-Farber Cancer Ins
| | - F Cardoso
- Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, ZH, Netherlands; European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, Brussels, Belgium; Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Canada; Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands; University Medical Center, Groningen, Netherlands; University Medical Center, Utrecht, Netherlands; Dutch Breast Cancer Research Group (BOOG), Netherlands; Västmanlands Hospital, Vateras, Sweden; ZNA Jan Palfijn, Belgium; UZ Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Breast International Group, Brussels, Belgium; Specialist Hospital. St. Wojciech, Gdansk, Poland; Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research, Switzerland; Hospital Universitario Vall d´Hebron, Barcelona, Spain; All Ireland Cooperative Oncology Research Group, Ireland; University of Washington, Seattle; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York; University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston; Mayo Clinic, Rochester; Dana-Farber Cancer Ins
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Weerts MJA, Timmermans EC, Vossen RHAM, van Strijp D, Van den Hout-van Vroonhoven MCGN, van IJcken WFJ, van der Zaag PJ, Anvar SY, Sleijfer S, Martens JWM. Sensitive detection of mitochondrial DNA variants for analysis of mitochondrial DNA-enriched extracts from frozen tumor tissue. Sci Rep 2018; 8:2261. [PMID: 29396409 PMCID: PMC5797170 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-20623-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2017] [Accepted: 01/22/2018] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Large variation exists in mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) not only between but also within individuals. Also in human cancer, tumor-specific mtDNA variation exists. In this work, we describe the comparison of four methods to extract mtDNA as pure as possible from frozen tumor tissue. Also, three state-of-the-art methods for sensitive detection of mtDNA variants were evaluated. The main aim was to develop a procedure to detect low-frequent single-nucleotide mtDNA-specific variants in frozen tumor tissue. We show that of the methods evaluated, DNA extracted from cytosol fractions following exonuclease treatment results in highest mtDNA yield and purity from frozen tumor tissue (270-fold mtDNA enrichment). Next, we demonstrate the sensitivity of detection of low-frequent single-nucleotide mtDNA variants (≤1% allele frequency) in breast cancer cell lines MDA-MB-231 and MCF-7 by single-molecule real-time (SMRT) sequencing, UltraSEEK chemistry based mass spectrometry, and digital PCR. We also show de novo detection and allelic phasing of variants by SMRT sequencing. We conclude that our sensitive procedure to detect low-frequent single-nucleotide mtDNA variants from frozen tumor tissue is based on extraction of DNA from cytosol fractions followed by exonuclease treatment to obtain high mtDNA purity, and subsequent SMRT sequencing for (de novo) detection and allelic phasing of variants.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M J A Weerts
- Department of Medical Oncology and Cancer Genomics Netherlands, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - E C Timmermans
- Philips Research Laboratories, High Tech Campus 11, 5656 AE, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - R H A M Vossen
- Leiden Genome Technology Center (LGTC), Department of Human Genetics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - D van Strijp
- Philips Research Laboratories, High Tech Campus 11, 5656 AE, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | | | | | - P J van der Zaag
- Philips Research Laboratories, High Tech Campus 11, 5656 AE, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - S Y Anvar
- Leiden Genome Technology Center (LGTC), Department of Human Genetics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.,Department of Human Genetics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.,Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Toxicology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - S Sleijfer
- Department of Medical Oncology and Cancer Genomics Netherlands, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - J W M Martens
- Department of Medical Oncology and Cancer Genomics Netherlands, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Hammerl D, Smid M, Timmermans AM, Sleijfer S, Martens JWM, Debets R. Breast cancer genomics and immuno-oncological markers to guide immune therapies. Semin Cancer Biol 2017; 52:178-188. [PMID: 29104025 DOI: 10.1016/j.semcancer.2017.11.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 94] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2017] [Revised: 10/30/2017] [Accepted: 11/01/2017] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
There is an increasing awareness of the importance of tumor - immune cell interactions to the evolution and therapy responses of breast cancer (BC). Not surprisingly, numerous studies are currently assessing the clinical value of immune modulation for BC patients. However, till now durable clinical responses are only rarely observed. It is important to realize that BC is a heterogeneous disease comprising several histological and molecular subtypes, which cannot be expected to be equally immunogenic and therefore not equally sensitive to single immune therapies. Here we review the characteristics of infiltrating leukocytes in healthy and malignant breast tissue, the prognostic and predictive values of immune cell subsets across different BC subtypes and the various existing immune evasive mechanisms. Furthermore, we describe the presence of certain groups of antigens as putative targets for treatment, evaluate the outcomes of current clinical immunotherapy trials, and finally, we propose a strategy to better implement immuno-oncological markers to guide future immune therapies in BC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D Hammerl
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC - Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - M Smid
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC - Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - A M Timmermans
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC - Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - S Sleijfer
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC - Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - J W M Martens
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC - Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - R Debets
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC - Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Moghadasi S, Grundeken V, Janssen LAM, Dijkstra NH, Rodríguez-Girondo M, van Zelst-Stams WAG, Oosterwijk JC, Ausems MGEM, Oldenburg RA, Adank MA, Blom EW, Ruijs MWG, van Os TAM, van Deurzen CHM, Martens JWM, Schroder CP, Wijnen JT, Vreeswijk MPG, van Asperen CJ. Performance of BRCA1/2 mutation prediction models in male breast cancer patients. Clin Genet 2017; 93:52-59. [PMID: 28589637 DOI: 10.1111/cge.13065] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2017] [Revised: 05/12/2017] [Accepted: 06/01/2017] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Abstract
To establish whether existing mutation prediction models can identify which male breast cancer (MBC) patients should be offered BRCA1 and BRCA2 diagnostic DNA screening, we compared the performance of BOADICEA (Breast and Ovarian Analysis of Disease Incidence and Carrier Estimation Algorithm), BRCAPRO (BRCA probability) and the Myriad prevalence table ("Myriad"). These models were evaluated using the family data of 307 Dutch MBC probands tested for BRCA1/2, 58 (19%) of whom were carriers. We compared the numbers of observed vs predicted carriers and assessed the Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) Curve (AUC) for each model. BOADICEA predicted the total number of BRCA1/2 mutation carriers quite accurately (observed/predicted ratio: 0.94). When a cut-off of 10% and 20% prior probability was used, BRCAPRO showed a non-significant better performance (observed/predicted ratio BOADICEA: 0.81, 95% confidence interval [CI]: [0.60-1.09] and 0.79, 95% CI: [0.57-1.09], vs. BRCAPRO 1.02, 95% CI: [0.75-1.38] and 0.94, 95% CI: [0.68-1.31], respectively). Myriad underestimated the number of carriers in up to 69% of the cases. BRCAPRO showed a non-significant, higher AUC than BOADICEA (0.798 vs 0.776). Myriad showed a significantly lower AUC (0.671). BRCAPRO and BOADICEA can efficiently identify MBC patients as BRCA1/2 mutation carriers. Besides their general applicability, these tools will be of particular value in countries with limited healthcare resources.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Moghadasi
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - V Grundeken
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - L A M Janssen
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - N H Dijkstra
- Dutch Breast Cancer Research Group, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - M Rodríguez-Girondo
- Department of Medical Statistics and Bioinformatics, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - W A G van Zelst-Stams
- Department of Human Genetics, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - J C Oosterwijk
- Department of Genetics, University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - M G E M Ausems
- Department of Genetics, University Medical Centre, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - R A Oldenburg
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - M A Adank
- Department of Clinical Genetics, VU University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - E W Blom
- Department Clinical Genetics, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - M W G Ruijs
- Department of Clinical Genetics, the Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - T A M van Os
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - C H M van Deurzen
- Department of Pathology, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - J W M Martens
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - C P Schroder
- Department of Medical Oncology, University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - J T Wijnen
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands.,Department of Human Genetics, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - M P G Vreeswijk
- Department of Human Genetics, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - C J van Asperen
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Doebar SC, Sieuwerts AM, de Weerd V, Martens JWM, van Deurzen CHM. Abstract P3-17-02: Gene expression differences between ductal carcinoma in situ with and without progression to invasive breast cancer. Cancer Res 2017. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs16-p3-17-02] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background
The mechanism behind progression of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) to invasive breast cancer (IBC) remains unknown. The aim of our study was to increase our understanding regarding molecular alterations driving DCIS progression by comparing gene-expression patterns between patients with pure DCIS and patients with synchronous DCIS and IBC.
Methods
In this retrospective study, we included patients with extensive pure DCIS (n=12), defined as > 5 cm, as a representation of biologically indolent lesions with limited invasive capacity. These cases were matched with patients with a limited DCIS component, defined as < 1 cm, and synchronous IBC (n=12), representing lesions with a high invasive potential. Matching was based on age and surrogate DCIS subtypes. Gene expression profiling, using 93 tumor-specific target genes, was performed to identify transcriptional differences between the DCIS components of these two groups. The identified genes were validated by immunohistochemistry.
Results
In total, for 9 genes there was a significant difference in gene expression between patients with pure DCIS and patients with DCIS and synchronous IBC. The majority of these 9 genes were significantly higher expressed in DCIS samples with IBC, including PLAU (P=0.002), COL1A1 (P=0.006), KRT81 (P=0.009), S100A7 (P=0.015), SCGB1D2 (P=0.023), KRT18 (P=0.029) and NOTCH3 (P= 0.044), while EGFR and CXCL14 showed a significantly higher expression in pure DCIS (P=0.015 and P=0.028 respectively). Based on these 9 genes, unsupervised hierarchical clustering-analysis revealed distinct clustering of patients with pure DCIS and patients with DCIS and synchronous IBC. Immunohistochemical analyses are in progress.
Conclusion
This pilot study suggests that patients with pure DCIS have a significant different gene expression pattern as compared to patients with DCIS and synchronous IBC. If these results can be validated in an independent cohort, these differently expressed genes could be used to predict progression in individual patients diagnosed with DCIS. Furthermore, these genes may pinpoint driver pathway(s) that play an important role in the progression of DCIS to IBC.
Citation Format: Doebar SC, Sieuwerts AM, de Weerd V, Martens JWM, van Deurzen CHM. Gene expression differences between ductal carcinoma in situ with and without progression to invasive breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2016 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2016 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P3-17-02.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- SC Doebar
- Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, Zuid-Holland, Netherlands
| | - AM Sieuwerts
- Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, Zuid-Holland, Netherlands
| | - V de Weerd
- Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, Zuid-Holland, Netherlands
| | - JWM Martens
- Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, Zuid-Holland, Netherlands
| | - CHM van Deurzen
- Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, Zuid-Holland, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Vitale SR, Sieuwerts AM, Helmijr J, Beije N, van der Vlugt – Daane M, Foekens JA, Sleijfer S, Jansen MPHM, Martens JWM. Abstract P1-09-20: An optimized workflow to analyze ESR1 mutations in both circulating cell-free and circulating tumor cell DNA by digital PCR. Cancer Res 2017. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs16-p1-09-20] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background
In metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients ESR1 mutations (mESR1) in cell-free DNA (cfDNA) have been related to endocrine therapy (ET) resistance. Such mutations might also be detectable in circulating tumor cells (CTCs). Mutation detection in small amounts of cfDNA and in CTCs in a background of leukocytes is highly challenging. The current study evaluated how to reliably investigate mESR1 status in such minute amounts of cfDNA and in DNA from CellSearch-enriched CTCs.
Materials & Methods
Plasma (200 µL) and matched CellSearch-enriched CTC fractions of 7 healthy blood donors (HBD) and 29 MBC patients at baseline and after ET (≥ 5 CTC/7.5 mL) were evaluated. cfDNA was isolated from plasma with the QIAamp CNA kit and CTC-enriched DNA with the AllPrep kit (Qiagen). mESR1 status in both cfDNA and CTC-enriched DNA fractions was compared with or without whole genome amplification (repli-g WGA, Qiagen) or ESR1 target specific amplification. Quantitative PCR (qPCR) for wild type (WT) ESR1 was used to control the number of WT copies loaded into the chips for digital PCR (dPCR) analysis. The variant allele frequencies (VAF) of hotspot mutations for ESR1 (D538G, Y537S, Y537C and Y537N) were evaluated with mutation-specific Taqman assays by chip-based dPCR (QuantStudio 3D, Thermo Fischer Scientific).
Results
To allow inclusion of as many samples as possible, we successfully downscaled the volume of required plasma from 1 mL to 200 µL as this resulted in the same VAF. Sample-type specific thresholds for mESR1 presence were established (2% for the cell-free plasma samples, at which percentage all HBDs were negative, and 0.5% for the CTCs to allow identification of one mutated CTC-specific copy in a background of ~1,000 leukocytes).
WGA was unable to adequately amplify fragmented cfDNA, resulting in a too low DNA yield. However, locus-specific target pre-amplification of a 136 bp fragment covering all 4 different mutations followed by mutant specific dPCR performed well for both cfDNA and CTC DNA, but only if the loading of the pre-amplified product into the dPCR chips was optimized by qPCR for the number of WT ESR1 copies.
The most optimal results for dPCR data interpretation were obtained after: 1. including at least one positive sample in each dPCR session; 2. using a “safe loading window”, 3. loading and reading chips at least twice in QuantStudio 3D ; 4. critically evaluating the contribution by a non-specific “comet effect”; and 5. after loading the data in the software, performing at least two independent data analyses to exclude intra-observer variations.
Summary
Here we describe our workflow to assess mESR1 in a limited amount of plasma cfDNA or CellSearch enriched CTC DNA. This workflow has been successfully used to investigate the mESR1 VAF status in DNA from matched CTC DNA and cfDNA of MBC patients before start of 1st line endocrine therapy and at progression (see also abstract number 851017).
Citation Format: Vitale SR, Sieuwerts AM, Helmijr J, Beije N, van der Vlugt – Daane M, Foekens JA, Sleijfer S, Jansen MPHM, Martens JWM. An optimized workflow to analyze ESR1 mutations in both circulating cell-free and circulating tumor cell DNA by digital PCR [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2016 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2016 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-09-20.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- SR Vitale
- Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands; University of Catania, Catania, Italy; Cancer Genomics Netherlands, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - AM Sieuwerts
- Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands; University of Catania, Catania, Italy; Cancer Genomics Netherlands, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - J Helmijr
- Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands; University of Catania, Catania, Italy; Cancer Genomics Netherlands, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - N Beije
- Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands; University of Catania, Catania, Italy; Cancer Genomics Netherlands, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - M van der Vlugt – Daane
- Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands; University of Catania, Catania, Italy; Cancer Genomics Netherlands, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - JA Foekens
- Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands; University of Catania, Catania, Italy; Cancer Genomics Netherlands, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - S Sleijfer
- Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands; University of Catania, Catania, Italy; Cancer Genomics Netherlands, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - MPHM Jansen
- Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands; University of Catania, Catania, Italy; Cancer Genomics Netherlands, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - JWM Martens
- Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands; University of Catania, Catania, Italy; Cancer Genomics Netherlands, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Mateo F, Arenas EJ, Aguilar H, Serra-Musach J, de Garibay GR, Boni J, Maicas M, Du S, Iorio F, Herranz-Ors C, Islam A, Prado X, Llorente A, Petit A, Vidal A, Català I, Soler T, Venturas G, Rojo-Sebastian A, Serra H, Cuadras D, Blanco I, Lozano J, Canals F, Sieuwerts AM, de Weerd V, Look MP, Puertas S, García N, Perkins AS, Bonifaci N, Skowron M, Gómez-Baldó L, Hernández V, Martínez-Aranda A, Martínez-Iniesta M, Serrat X, Cerón J, Brunet J, Barretina MP, Gil M, Falo C, Fernández A, Morilla I, Pernas S, Plà MJ, Andreu X, Seguí MA, Ballester R, Castellà E, Nellist M, Morales S, Valls J, Velasco A, Matias-Guiu X, Figueras A, Sánchez-Mut JV, Sánchez-Céspedes M, Cordero A, Gómez-Miragaya J, Palomero L, Gómez A, Gajewski TF, Cohen EEW, Jesiotr M, Bodnar L, Quintela-Fandino M, López-Bigas N, Valdés-Mas R, Puente XS, Viñals F, Casanovas O, Graupera M, Hernández-Losa J, Ramón Y Cajal S, García-Alonso L, Saez-Rodriguez J, Esteller M, Sierra A, Martín-Martín N, Matheu A, Carracedo A, González-Suárez E, Nanjundan M, Cortés J, Lázaro C, Odero MD, Martens JWM, Moreno-Bueno G, Barcellos-Hoff MH, Villanueva A, Gomis RR, Pujana MA. Stem cell-like transcriptional reprogramming mediates metastatic resistance to mTOR inhibition. Oncogene 2016; 36:2737-2749. [PMID: 27991928 PMCID: PMC5442428 DOI: 10.1038/onc.2016.427] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2016] [Revised: 08/31/2016] [Accepted: 10/10/2016] [Indexed: 01/16/2023]
Abstract
Inhibitors of the mechanistic target of rapamycin (mTOR) are currently used to treat advanced metastatic breast cancer. However, whether an aggressive phenotype is sustained through adaptation or resistance to mTOR inhibition remains unknown. Here, complementary studies in human tumors, cancer models and cell lines reveal transcriptional reprogramming that supports metastasis in response to mTOR inhibition. This cancer feature is driven by EVI1 and SOX9. EVI1 functionally cooperates with and positively regulates SOX9, and promotes the transcriptional upregulation of key mTOR pathway components (REHB and RAPTOR) and of lung metastasis mediators (FSCN1 and SPARC). The expression of EVI1 and SOX9 is associated with stem cell-like and metastasis signatures, and their depletion impairs the metastatic potential of breast cancer cells. These results establish the mechanistic link between resistance to mTOR inhibition and cancer metastatic potential, thus enhancing our understanding of mTOR targeting failure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F Mateo
- Breast Cancer and Systems Biology Laboratory, Program Against Cancer Therapeutic Resistance (ProCURE), Catalan Institute of Oncology (ICO), Bellvitge Institute for Biomedical Research (IDIBELL), L'Hospitalet del Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
| | - E J Arenas
- Oncology Program, Institute for Research in Biomedicine (IRB Barcelona), The Barcelona Institute of Science and Technology, Barcelona, Spain
| | - H Aguilar
- Breast Cancer and Systems Biology Laboratory, Program Against Cancer Therapeutic Resistance (ProCURE), Catalan Institute of Oncology (ICO), Bellvitge Institute for Biomedical Research (IDIBELL), L'Hospitalet del Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
| | - J Serra-Musach
- Breast Cancer and Systems Biology Laboratory, Program Against Cancer Therapeutic Resistance (ProCURE), Catalan Institute of Oncology (ICO), Bellvitge Institute for Biomedical Research (IDIBELL), L'Hospitalet del Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
| | - G Ruiz de Garibay
- Breast Cancer and Systems Biology Laboratory, Program Against Cancer Therapeutic Resistance (ProCURE), Catalan Institute of Oncology (ICO), Bellvitge Institute for Biomedical Research (IDIBELL), L'Hospitalet del Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
| | - J Boni
- Breast Cancer and Systems Biology Laboratory, Program Against Cancer Therapeutic Resistance (ProCURE), Catalan Institute of Oncology (ICO), Bellvitge Institute for Biomedical Research (IDIBELL), L'Hospitalet del Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
| | - M Maicas
- Centre for Applied Medical Research (CIMA) and Department of Biochemistry and Genetics, University of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
| | - S Du
- Department of Radiation Oncology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - F Iorio
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory-European Bioinformatics Institute (EMBL-EBI), Wellcome Trust Genome Campus, Cambridge, UK.,Cancer Genome Project, Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, UK
| | - C Herranz-Ors
- Breast Cancer and Systems Biology Laboratory, Program Against Cancer Therapeutic Resistance (ProCURE), Catalan Institute of Oncology (ICO), Bellvitge Institute for Biomedical Research (IDIBELL), L'Hospitalet del Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
| | - A Islam
- Department of Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology, University of Dhaka, Dhaka, Bangladesh
| | - X Prado
- Breast Cancer and Systems Biology Laboratory, Program Against Cancer Therapeutic Resistance (ProCURE), Catalan Institute of Oncology (ICO), Bellvitge Institute for Biomedical Research (IDIBELL), L'Hospitalet del Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
| | - A Llorente
- Breast Cancer and Systems Biology Laboratory, Program Against Cancer Therapeutic Resistance (ProCURE), Catalan Institute of Oncology (ICO), Bellvitge Institute for Biomedical Research (IDIBELL), L'Hospitalet del Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
| | - A Petit
- Department of Pathology, University Hospital of Bellvitge, IDIBELL, L'Hospitalet del Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
| | - A Vidal
- Department of Pathology, University Hospital of Bellvitge, IDIBELL, L'Hospitalet del Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
| | - I Català
- Department of Pathology, University Hospital of Bellvitge, IDIBELL, L'Hospitalet del Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
| | - T Soler
- Department of Pathology, University Hospital of Bellvitge, IDIBELL, L'Hospitalet del Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
| | - G Venturas
- Department of Pathology, University Hospital of Bellvitge, IDIBELL, L'Hospitalet del Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
| | - A Rojo-Sebastian
- Department of Pathology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Madrid, Spain
| | - H Serra
- Angiogenesis Research Group, ProCURE, ICO, IDIBELL, L'Hospitalet del Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
| | - D Cuadras
- Statistics Unit, IDIBELL, L'Hospitalet del Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
| | - I Blanco
- Hereditary Cancer Programme, ICO, IDIBELL, L'Hospitalet del Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
| | - J Lozano
- Department of Molecular Biology and Biochemistry, Málaga University, and Molecular Oncology Laboratory, Mediterranean Institute for the Advance of Biotechnology and Health Research (IBIMA), University Hospital Virgen de la Victoria, Málaga, Spain
| | - F Canals
- ProteoRed-Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Proteomic Laboratory, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
| | - A M Sieuwerts
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Daniel den Hoed Cancer Center, Cancer Genomics Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - V de Weerd
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Daniel den Hoed Cancer Center, Cancer Genomics Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - M P Look
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Daniel den Hoed Cancer Center, Cancer Genomics Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - S Puertas
- Chemoresistance and Predictive Factors Laboratory, ProCURE, ICO, IDIBELL, L'Hospitalet del Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
| | - N García
- Breast Cancer and Systems Biology Laboratory, Program Against Cancer Therapeutic Resistance (ProCURE), Catalan Institute of Oncology (ICO), Bellvitge Institute for Biomedical Research (IDIBELL), L'Hospitalet del Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
| | - A S Perkins
- University of Rochester Medical Center, School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY, USA
| | - N Bonifaci
- Breast Cancer and Systems Biology Laboratory, Program Against Cancer Therapeutic Resistance (ProCURE), Catalan Institute of Oncology (ICO), Bellvitge Institute for Biomedical Research (IDIBELL), L'Hospitalet del Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
| | - M Skowron
- Breast Cancer and Systems Biology Laboratory, Program Against Cancer Therapeutic Resistance (ProCURE), Catalan Institute of Oncology (ICO), Bellvitge Institute for Biomedical Research (IDIBELL), L'Hospitalet del Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
| | - L Gómez-Baldó
- Breast Cancer and Systems Biology Laboratory, Program Against Cancer Therapeutic Resistance (ProCURE), Catalan Institute of Oncology (ICO), Bellvitge Institute for Biomedical Research (IDIBELL), L'Hospitalet del Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
| | - V Hernández
- Biological Clues of the Invasive and Metastatic Phenotype Laboratory, IDIBELL, L'Hospitalet del Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
| | - A Martínez-Aranda
- Biological Clues of the Invasive and Metastatic Phenotype Laboratory, IDIBELL, L'Hospitalet del Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
| | - M Martínez-Iniesta
- Chemoresistance and Predictive Factors Laboratory, ProCURE, ICO, IDIBELL, L'Hospitalet del Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
| | - X Serrat
- Cancer and Human Molecular Genetics, IDIBELL, Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
| | - J Cerón
- Cancer and Human Molecular Genetics, IDIBELL, Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
| | - J Brunet
- Hereditary Cancer Programme, ICO, Girona Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBGI), Girona, Spain
| | - M P Barretina
- Department of Medical Oncology, ICO, IDIBGI, Girona, Spain
| | - M Gil
- Department of Medical Oncology, ICO, IDIBELL, L'Hospitalet del Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
| | - C Falo
- Department of Medical Oncology, ICO, IDIBELL, L'Hospitalet del Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
| | - A Fernández
- Department of Medical Oncology, ICO, IDIBELL, L'Hospitalet del Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
| | - I Morilla
- Department of Medical Oncology, ICO, IDIBELL, L'Hospitalet del Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
| | - S Pernas
- Department of Medical Oncology, ICO, IDIBELL, L'Hospitalet del Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
| | - M J Plà
- Department of Gynecology, University Hospital of Bellvitge, IDIBELL, L'Hospitalet del Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
| | - X Andreu
- Department of Pathology, Parc Taulí Hospital Consortium, Sabadell, Barcelona, Spain
| | - M A Seguí
- Medical Oncology Service, Parc Taulí Hospital Consortium, Sabadell, Barcelona, Spain
| | - R Ballester
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Germans Trias i Pujol, ICO, Germans Trias i Pujol Research Institute (IGTP), Badalona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - E Castellà
- Department of Pathology, University Hospital Germans Trias i Pujol, ICO, IGTP, Badalona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - M Nellist
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - S Morales
- Hospital Arnau de Vilanova, University of Lleida, Biomedical Research Institute of Lleida (IRB Lleida), Lleida, Spain
| | - J Valls
- Hospital Arnau de Vilanova, University of Lleida, Biomedical Research Institute of Lleida (IRB Lleida), Lleida, Spain
| | - A Velasco
- Hospital Arnau de Vilanova, University of Lleida, Biomedical Research Institute of Lleida (IRB Lleida), Lleida, Spain
| | - X Matias-Guiu
- Hospital Arnau de Vilanova, University of Lleida, Biomedical Research Institute of Lleida (IRB Lleida), Lleida, Spain
| | - A Figueras
- Angiogenesis Research Group, ProCURE, ICO, IDIBELL, L'Hospitalet del Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
| | - J V Sánchez-Mut
- Cancer Epigenetics and Biology Program (PEBC), IDIBELL, L'Hospitalet del Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
| | - M Sánchez-Céspedes
- Cancer Epigenetics and Biology Program (PEBC), IDIBELL, L'Hospitalet del Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
| | - A Cordero
- Cancer Epigenetics and Biology Program (PEBC), IDIBELL, L'Hospitalet del Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
| | - J Gómez-Miragaya
- Cancer Epigenetics and Biology Program (PEBC), IDIBELL, L'Hospitalet del Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
| | - L Palomero
- Breast Cancer and Systems Biology Laboratory, Program Against Cancer Therapeutic Resistance (ProCURE), Catalan Institute of Oncology (ICO), Bellvitge Institute for Biomedical Research (IDIBELL), L'Hospitalet del Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
| | - A Gómez
- Cancer Epigenetics and Biology Program (PEBC), IDIBELL, L'Hospitalet del Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
| | - T F Gajewski
- Departments of Pathology and Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - E E W Cohen
- Moores Cancer Center, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - M Jesiotr
- Department of Pathology, Military Institute of Medicine, Warsaw, Poland
| | - L Bodnar
- Department of Oncology, Military Institute of Medicine, Warsaw, Poland
| | - M Quintela-Fandino
- Breast Cancer Clinical Research Unit, Spanish National Cancer Research Center (CNIO), Madrid, Spain
| | - N López-Bigas
- Department of Experimental and Health Sciences, Barcelona Biomedical Research Park, Pompeu Fabra University (UPF), Barcelona, Spain.,Institució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats (ICREA), Barcelona, Spain
| | - R Valdés-Mas
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University Institute of Oncology of Asturias, University of Oviedo, Oviedo, Spain
| | - X S Puente
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University Institute of Oncology of Asturias, University of Oviedo, Oviedo, Spain
| | - F Viñals
- Angiogenesis Research Group, ProCURE, ICO, IDIBELL, L'Hospitalet del Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
| | - O Casanovas
- Angiogenesis Research Group, ProCURE, ICO, IDIBELL, L'Hospitalet del Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
| | - M Graupera
- Angiogenesis Research Group, ProCURE, ICO, IDIBELL, L'Hospitalet del Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
| | - J Hernández-Losa
- Department of Pathology, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
| | - S Ramón Y Cajal
- Department of Pathology, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
| | - L García-Alonso
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory-European Bioinformatics Institute (EMBL-EBI), Wellcome Trust Genome Campus, Cambridge, UK
| | - J Saez-Rodriguez
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory-European Bioinformatics Institute (EMBL-EBI), Wellcome Trust Genome Campus, Cambridge, UK
| | - M Esteller
- Cancer Epigenetics and Biology Program (PEBC), IDIBELL, L'Hospitalet del Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain.,Institució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats (ICREA), Barcelona, Spain.,Department of Physiological Sciences II, School of Medicine, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - A Sierra
- Molecular and Translational Oncology Laboratory, Biomedical Research Center CELLEX-CRBC, Biomedical Research Institute 'August Pi i Sunyer' (IDIBAPS), and Systems Biology Department, Faculty of Science and Technology, University of Vic, Central University of Catalonia, Barcelona, Spain
| | - N Martín-Martín
- Center for Cooperative Research in Biosciences (CIC bioGUNE), Derio, Spain
| | - A Matheu
- Neuro-Oncology Section, Oncology Department, Biodonostia Research Institute, San Sebastian, Spain.,Ikerbasque, Basque Foundation for Science, Bilbao, Spain
| | - A Carracedo
- Center for Cooperative Research in Biosciences (CIC bioGUNE), Derio, Spain.,Ikerbasque, Basque Foundation for Science, Bilbao, Spain.,Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU), Bilbao, Spain
| | - E González-Suárez
- Cancer Epigenetics and Biology Program (PEBC), IDIBELL, L'Hospitalet del Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
| | - M Nanjundan
- Department of Cell Biology, Microbiology, and Molecular Biology, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - J Cortés
- Department of Medical Oncology, VHIO, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
| | - C Lázaro
- Hereditary Cancer Programme, ICO, IDIBELL, L'Hospitalet del Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
| | - M D Odero
- Centre for Applied Medical Research (CIMA) and Department of Biochemistry and Genetics, University of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
| | - J W M Martens
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Daniel den Hoed Cancer Center, Cancer Genomics Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - G Moreno-Bueno
- Department of Biochemistry, Autonomous University of Madrid (UAM), Biomedical Research Institute 'Alberto Sols' (Spanish National Research Council (CSIC)-UAM), Translational Research Laboratory, Hospital La Paz Institute for Health Research (IdiPAZ), and MD Anderson International Foundation, Madrid, Spain
| | - M H Barcellos-Hoff
- Department of Radiation Oncology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - A Villanueva
- Chemoresistance and Predictive Factors Laboratory, ProCURE, ICO, IDIBELL, L'Hospitalet del Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
| | - R R Gomis
- Oncology Program, Institute for Research in Biomedicine (IRB Barcelona), The Barcelona Institute of Science and Technology, Barcelona, Spain.,Institució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats (ICREA), Barcelona, Spain
| | - M A Pujana
- Breast Cancer and Systems Biology Laboratory, Program Against Cancer Therapeutic Resistance (ProCURE), Catalan Institute of Oncology (ICO), Bellvitge Institute for Biomedical Research (IDIBELL), L'Hospitalet del Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
van der Stok EP, Smid M, Sieuwerts AM, Vermeulen PB, Sleijfer S, Ayez N, Grünhagen DJ, Martens JWM, Verhoef C. mRNA expression profiles of colorectal liver metastases as a novel biomarker for early recurrence after partial hepatectomy. Mol Oncol 2016; 10:1542-1550. [PMID: 27692894 DOI: 10.1016/j.molonc.2016.09.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2016] [Revised: 08/31/2016] [Accepted: 09/12/2016] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Identification of specific risk groups for recurrence after surgery for isolated colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) remains challenging due to the heterogeneity of the disease. Classical clinicopathologic parameters have limited prognostic value. The aim of this study was to identify a gene expression signature measured in CRLM discriminating early from late recurrence after partial hepatectomy. METHODS CRLM from two patient groups were collected: I) with recurrent disease ≤12 months after surgery (N = 33), and II) without recurrences and disease free for ≥36 months (N = 30). The patients were clinically homogeneous; all had a low clinical risk score (0-2) and did not receive (neo-) adjuvant chemotherapy. Total RNA was hybridised to Illumina arrays, and processed for analysis. A leave-one-out cross validation (LOOCV) analysis was performed to identify a prognostic gene expression signature. RESULTS LOOCV yielded an 11-gene profile with prognostic value in relation to recurrent disease ≤12 months after partial hepatectomy. This signature had a sensitivity of 81.8%, with a specificity of 66.7% for predicting recurrences (≤12 months) versus no recurrences for at least 36 months after surgery (X2 P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION The current study yielded an 11-gene signature at mRNA level in CRLM discriminating early from late or no relapse after partial hepatectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E P van der Stok
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Groene Hilledijk 301, 3075 EA Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - M Smid
- Department of Medical Oncology and Cancer Genomics Netherlands, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, 's-Gravendijkwal 230, 3015 CE Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - A M Sieuwerts
- Department of Medical Oncology and Cancer Genomics Netherlands, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, 's-Gravendijkwal 230, 3015 CE Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - P B Vermeulen
- Translational Cancer Research Group, Sint-Augustinus (GZA Hospitals) & CORE (Antwerp University), Oosterveldlaan 24, 2610 Wilrijk-Antwerp, Belgium
| | - S Sleijfer
- Department of Medical Oncology and Cancer Genomics Netherlands, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, 's-Gravendijkwal 230, 3015 CE Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - N Ayez
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Groene Hilledijk 301, 3075 EA Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - D J Grünhagen
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Groene Hilledijk 301, 3075 EA Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - J W M Martens
- Department of Medical Oncology and Cancer Genomics Netherlands, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, 's-Gravendijkwal 230, 3015 CE Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - C Verhoef
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Groene Hilledijk 301, 3075 EA Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Martens JWM, Smid M, Rodríguez-González G, Sieuwerts AM, Prager-Van der Smissen WJC, Van Der Vlugt - Daane M, Van Galen A, Nik-Zainal S, Staaf J, Brinkman AB, Van de Vijver MJ, Richardson AL, Berentsen K, Caldas C, Butler A, Martin S, Davies HD, Debets R, Meijer-Van Gelder ME, Van Deurzen CHM, Ramakrishna MR, Ringnér M, Viari A, Birney E, Børresen-Dale AL, Stunnenberg HG, Stratton M, Foekens JA. Abstract P6-08-10: Mutational signatures impact the breast cancer transcriptome and distinguish mitotic from immune response pathways. Cancer Res 2016. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs15-p6-08-10] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
A comprehensive whole genome analysis of a large breast cancer cohort of 560 cases (Nik-Zainal et al, submitted 2015) reports novel and existing DNA substitution and rearrangement signatures next a comprehensive list of events driving the breast cancer cell to its malignant potency. In the current study, we linked the observed genetic diversity to the breast cancer transcriptome for 260 cases for which whole genome and whole transcriptome data were both available.
Cluster analysis of the global gene expression showed the familiar view of a coherent basal-like and a heterogeneous luminal subgroup. New and previously reported1 subtype-specific aberrations with concordant expression changes were found in TP53, PIK3CA, PTEN, CCND1, CDH1 and GATA3, and mutations in PIK3CA, PTEN, AKT1 and AKT2 were mutually exclusive confirming they are active in the same pathway in breast cancer.
Integrating the identified DNA substitutions signatures with the transcriptome, we observed that the total number of substitutions in a cancer, irrespective of substitution type, was positively associated with cell cycle regulated gene expression and with adverse outcome.
In addition and more remarkably, we observed that the number substitution of two substitution signatures2 particularly associated with immune-response specific gene expression, with increased amount of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes and with a better outcome. These two signatures comprised 1) mutations of the APOBEC-type (predominant C>G in a TCN context), and 2) mutations which lacks specific features but which are strongly associated with genetic and epigenetic inactivating aberrations in BRCA1 and BRCA2.
Thus, while earlier reports3-5 imply that the sheer number of driver events triggers an immune-response, we refine this statement by observing that substitutions of a particular type are much very effective in doing so explaining the superior outcome of cancer having these particular types of substitutions. This result also implies that purposefully augmenting T-cell reactivity against amino-acid substitutions resulting from either of these two DNA substitution types could potentially improve immunotherapies in breast cancer.
1. Comprehensive molecular portraits of human breast tumours. Nature 490, 61-70 (2012).
2. Alexandrov, L.B., et al. Signatures of mutational processes in human cancer. Nature 500, 415-421 (2013).
3. Rizvi, N.A., et al. Cancer immunology. Mutational landscape determines sensitivity to PD-1 blockade in non-small cell lung cancer. Science 348, 124-128 (2015).
4. Schumacher, T.N. & Schreiber, R.D. Neoantigens in cancer immunotherapy. Science 348, 69-74 (2015).
5. Snyder, A., et al. Genetic basis for clinical response to CTLA-4 blockade in melanoma. N Engl J Med 371, 2189-2199 (2014).
Citation Format: Martens JWM, Smid M, Rodríguez-González G, Sieuwerts AM, Prager-Van der Smissen WJC, Van Der Vlugt - Daane M, Van Galen A, Nik-Zainal S, Staaf J, Brinkman AB, Van de Vijver MJ, Richardson AL, Berentsen K, Caldas C, Butler A, Martin S, Davies HD, Debets R, Meijer-Van Gelder ME, Van Deurzen CHM, Ramakrishna MR, Ringnér M, Viari A, Birney E, Børresen-Dale A-L, Stunnenberg HG, Stratton M, Foekens JA. Mutational signatures impact the breast cancer transcriptome and distinguish mitotic from immune response pathways. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Eighth Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2015 Dec 8-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P6-08-10.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- JWM Martens
- Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, Netherlands; Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, United Kingdom; Lund University, Lund, Sweden; Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, Netherlands; Academic Medical Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom; Synergie Lyon Cancer, Lyon, France; European Bioinformatics Institute, Hinxton, United Kingdom; University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - M Smid
- Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, Netherlands; Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, United Kingdom; Lund University, Lund, Sweden; Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, Netherlands; Academic Medical Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom; Synergie Lyon Cancer, Lyon, France; European Bioinformatics Institute, Hinxton, United Kingdom; University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - G Rodríguez-González
- Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, Netherlands; Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, United Kingdom; Lund University, Lund, Sweden; Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, Netherlands; Academic Medical Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom; Synergie Lyon Cancer, Lyon, France; European Bioinformatics Institute, Hinxton, United Kingdom; University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - AM Sieuwerts
- Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, Netherlands; Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, United Kingdom; Lund University, Lund, Sweden; Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, Netherlands; Academic Medical Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom; Synergie Lyon Cancer, Lyon, France; European Bioinformatics Institute, Hinxton, United Kingdom; University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - WJC Prager-Van der Smissen
- Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, Netherlands; Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, United Kingdom; Lund University, Lund, Sweden; Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, Netherlands; Academic Medical Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom; Synergie Lyon Cancer, Lyon, France; European Bioinformatics Institute, Hinxton, United Kingdom; University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - M Van Der Vlugt - Daane
- Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, Netherlands; Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, United Kingdom; Lund University, Lund, Sweden; Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, Netherlands; Academic Medical Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom; Synergie Lyon Cancer, Lyon, France; European Bioinformatics Institute, Hinxton, United Kingdom; University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - A Van Galen
- Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, Netherlands; Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, United Kingdom; Lund University, Lund, Sweden; Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, Netherlands; Academic Medical Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom; Synergie Lyon Cancer, Lyon, France; European Bioinformatics Institute, Hinxton, United Kingdom; University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - S Nik-Zainal
- Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, Netherlands; Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, United Kingdom; Lund University, Lund, Sweden; Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, Netherlands; Academic Medical Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom; Synergie Lyon Cancer, Lyon, France; European Bioinformatics Institute, Hinxton, United Kingdom; University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - J Staaf
- Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, Netherlands; Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, United Kingdom; Lund University, Lund, Sweden; Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, Netherlands; Academic Medical Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom; Synergie Lyon Cancer, Lyon, France; European Bioinformatics Institute, Hinxton, United Kingdom; University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - AB Brinkman
- Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, Netherlands; Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, United Kingdom; Lund University, Lund, Sweden; Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, Netherlands; Academic Medical Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom; Synergie Lyon Cancer, Lyon, France; European Bioinformatics Institute, Hinxton, United Kingdom; University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - MJ Van de Vijver
- Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, Netherlands; Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, United Kingdom; Lund University, Lund, Sweden; Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, Netherlands; Academic Medical Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom; Synergie Lyon Cancer, Lyon, France; European Bioinformatics Institute, Hinxton, United Kingdom; University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - AL Richardson
- Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, Netherlands; Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, United Kingdom; Lund University, Lund, Sweden; Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, Netherlands; Academic Medical Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom; Synergie Lyon Cancer, Lyon, France; European Bioinformatics Institute, Hinxton, United Kingdom; University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - K Berentsen
- Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, Netherlands; Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, United Kingdom; Lund University, Lund, Sweden; Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, Netherlands; Academic Medical Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom; Synergie Lyon Cancer, Lyon, France; European Bioinformatics Institute, Hinxton, United Kingdom; University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - C Caldas
- Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, Netherlands; Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, United Kingdom; Lund University, Lund, Sweden; Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, Netherlands; Academic Medical Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom; Synergie Lyon Cancer, Lyon, France; European Bioinformatics Institute, Hinxton, United Kingdom; University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - A Butler
- Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, Netherlands; Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, United Kingdom; Lund University, Lund, Sweden; Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, Netherlands; Academic Medical Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom; Synergie Lyon Cancer, Lyon, France; European Bioinformatics Institute, Hinxton, United Kingdom; University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - S Martin
- Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, Netherlands; Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, United Kingdom; Lund University, Lund, Sweden; Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, Netherlands; Academic Medical Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom; Synergie Lyon Cancer, Lyon, France; European Bioinformatics Institute, Hinxton, United Kingdom; University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - HD Davies
- Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, Netherlands; Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, United Kingdom; Lund University, Lund, Sweden; Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, Netherlands; Academic Medical Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom; Synergie Lyon Cancer, Lyon, France; European Bioinformatics Institute, Hinxton, United Kingdom; University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - R Debets
- Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, Netherlands; Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, United Kingdom; Lund University, Lund, Sweden; Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, Netherlands; Academic Medical Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom; Synergie Lyon Cancer, Lyon, France; European Bioinformatics Institute, Hinxton, United Kingdom; University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - ME Meijer-Van Gelder
- Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, Netherlands; Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, United Kingdom; Lund University, Lund, Sweden; Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, Netherlands; Academic Medical Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom; Synergie Lyon Cancer, Lyon, France; European Bioinformatics Institute, Hinxton, United Kingdom; University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - CHM Van Deurzen
- Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, Netherlands; Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, United Kingdom; Lund University, Lund, Sweden; Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, Netherlands; Academic Medical Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom; Synergie Lyon Cancer, Lyon, France; European Bioinformatics Institute, Hinxton, United Kingdom; University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - MR Ramakrishna
- Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, Netherlands; Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, United Kingdom; Lund University, Lund, Sweden; Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, Netherlands; Academic Medical Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom; Synergie Lyon Cancer, Lyon, France; European Bioinformatics Institute, Hinxton, United Kingdom; University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - M Ringnér
- Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, Netherlands; Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, United Kingdom; Lund University, Lund, Sweden; Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, Netherlands; Academic Medical Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom; Synergie Lyon Cancer, Lyon, France; European Bioinformatics Institute, Hinxton, United Kingdom; University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - A Viari
- Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, Netherlands; Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, United Kingdom; Lund University, Lund, Sweden; Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, Netherlands; Academic Medical Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom; Synergie Lyon Cancer, Lyon, France; European Bioinformatics Institute, Hinxton, United Kingdom; University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - E Birney
- Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, Netherlands; Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, United Kingdom; Lund University, Lund, Sweden; Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, Netherlands; Academic Medical Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom; Synergie Lyon Cancer, Lyon, France; European Bioinformatics Institute, Hinxton, United Kingdom; University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - A-L Børresen-Dale
- Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, Netherlands; Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, United Kingdom; Lund University, Lund, Sweden; Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, Netherlands; Academic Medical Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom; Synergie Lyon Cancer, Lyon, France; European Bioinformatics Institute, Hinxton, United Kingdom; University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - HG Stunnenberg
- Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, Netherlands; Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, United Kingdom; Lund University, Lund, Sweden; Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, Netherlands; Academic Medical Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom; Synergie Lyon Cancer, Lyon, France; European Bioinformatics Institute, Hinxton, United Kingdom; University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - M Stratton
- Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, Netherlands; Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, United Kingdom; Lund University, Lund, Sweden; Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, Netherlands; Academic Medical Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom; Synergie Lyon Cancer, Lyon, France; European Bioinformatics Institute, Hinxton, United Kingdom; University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - JA Foekens
- Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, Netherlands; Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, United Kingdom; Lund University, Lund, Sweden; Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, Netherlands; Academic Medical Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom; Synergie Lyon Cancer, Lyon, France; European Bioinformatics Institute, Hinxton, United Kingdom; University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
van der Willik KD, Timmermans MM, Look MP, Reijm EA, van Deurzen CHM, den Bakker MA, Westenend PJ, Martens JWM, Berns EMJJ, Jansen MPHM. Abstract P5-08-51: SIAH2 protein expression is inversely correlated with the ER status and outcome to tamoxifen therapy in metastatic breast cancer patients. Cancer Res 2016. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs15-p5-08-51] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Introduction: In a previous study we observed a positive correlation between Seven in Absentia Homolog 2 (SIAH2) and Estrogen Receptor (ER) mRNA levels. Additionally, high SIAH2 mRNA levels were related to a favorable progression-free survival (PFS) after first-line tamoxifen. In contrast, others showed high SIAH2 protein levels in ER-negative breast cancer associated with an unfavorable relapse-free survival. In this study, we investigated the above discrepancy between SIAH2 protein and mRNA findings and evaluated the prognostic and predictive value of SIAH2 protein in breast cancer patients.
Patients and methods: Tissue microarrays (TMAs) of formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded primary breast tumors were immunohistochemically stained for SIAH2 protein. The TMAs contained core specimens of 759 patients with early disease and of 245 ER-positive patients with advanced disease treated with first-line tamoxifen. SIAH2 protein staining was scored for its intensity and proportion positive cells and subsequently evaluated for its relationship with metastasis-free survival (MFS) and PFS in uni- and multivariate analyses including traditional prognostic or predictive factors, respectively.
Results: The proportion SIAH2-positive cells had a relationship with MFS and PFS, whereas staining intensity and a previous described score for SIAH2 combining intensity and proportion were not related with clinical outcome. Based on these results, tumors with more than 20% positive cells were considered as SIAH2-positive. In early disease, 267 patients (35%) had SIAH2-positive tumors, which were further characterized by decreased expression of ER at protein and mRNA levels (P <0.001 and P = 0.003, respectively). These SIAH2-positive tumors correlated with significant unfavorable MFS in lymph node negative, ER-positive breast cancer patients, but only in univariate analysis. In advanced disease, 86 patients (35%) had SIAH2-positive tumors which was associated with an unfavorable PFS after first-line tamoxifen in both uni- and multivariate analyses (HR = 1.45; 95% CI, 1.07 to 1.96; P = 0.015).
Conclusions: SIAH2 protein expression is especially observed in ER-negative tumors and has no additional prognostic value in breast cancer. The proportion SIAH2-positive cells in ER-positive tumors can be used as biomarker to predict tamoxifen treatment failure in breast cancer patients with advanced disease. Future studies should establish if expression of certain microRNAs explain the observed discrepancy in SIAH2 mRNA and protein levels.
Citation Format: van der Willik KD, Timmermans MM, Look MP, Reijm EA, van Deurzen CHM, den Bakker MA, Westenend PJ, Martens JWM, Berns EMJJ, Jansen MPHM. SIAH2 protein expression is inversely correlated with the ER status and outcome to tamoxifen therapy in metastatic breast cancer patients. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Eighth Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2015 Dec 8-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P5-08-51.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- KD van der Willik
- Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, Zuid-Holland, Netherlands; Maasstad Hospital, Rotterdam, Zuid-Holland, Netherlands; Laboratory for Pathology, Dordrecht, Zuid-Holland, Netherlands
| | - MM Timmermans
- Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, Zuid-Holland, Netherlands; Maasstad Hospital, Rotterdam, Zuid-Holland, Netherlands; Laboratory for Pathology, Dordrecht, Zuid-Holland, Netherlands
| | - MP Look
- Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, Zuid-Holland, Netherlands; Maasstad Hospital, Rotterdam, Zuid-Holland, Netherlands; Laboratory for Pathology, Dordrecht, Zuid-Holland, Netherlands
| | - EA Reijm
- Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, Zuid-Holland, Netherlands; Maasstad Hospital, Rotterdam, Zuid-Holland, Netherlands; Laboratory for Pathology, Dordrecht, Zuid-Holland, Netherlands
| | - CHM van Deurzen
- Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, Zuid-Holland, Netherlands; Maasstad Hospital, Rotterdam, Zuid-Holland, Netherlands; Laboratory for Pathology, Dordrecht, Zuid-Holland, Netherlands
| | - MA den Bakker
- Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, Zuid-Holland, Netherlands; Maasstad Hospital, Rotterdam, Zuid-Holland, Netherlands; Laboratory for Pathology, Dordrecht, Zuid-Holland, Netherlands
| | - PJ Westenend
- Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, Zuid-Holland, Netherlands; Maasstad Hospital, Rotterdam, Zuid-Holland, Netherlands; Laboratory for Pathology, Dordrecht, Zuid-Holland, Netherlands
| | - JWM Martens
- Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, Zuid-Holland, Netherlands; Maasstad Hospital, Rotterdam, Zuid-Holland, Netherlands; Laboratory for Pathology, Dordrecht, Zuid-Holland, Netherlands
| | - EMJJ Berns
- Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, Zuid-Holland, Netherlands; Maasstad Hospital, Rotterdam, Zuid-Holland, Netherlands; Laboratory for Pathology, Dordrecht, Zuid-Holland, Netherlands
| | - MPHM Jansen
- Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, Zuid-Holland, Netherlands; Maasstad Hospital, Rotterdam, Zuid-Holland, Netherlands; Laboratory for Pathology, Dordrecht, Zuid-Holland, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Reijm EA, Timmermans AM, Look MP, Meijer-van Gelder ME, Stobbe CK, van Deurzen CHM, Martens JWM, Sleijfer S, Foekens JA, Berns PMJJ, Jansen MPHM. High protein expression of EZH2 is related to unfavorable outcome to tamoxifen in metastatic breast cancer. Ann Oncol 2014; 25:2185-2190. [PMID: 25193989 DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdu391] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Metastatic breast cancer (MBC) is a highly heterogeneous disease with great differences in outcome to both chemo- and endocrine therapy. Better insight into the mechanisms underlying resistance is essential to better predict outcome to therapy and to obtain a more tailored treatment approach. We have previously described that increased mRNA expression levels of Enhancer of Zeste homolog (EZH2) are associated with worse outcome to tamoxifen therapy in MBC. Here, we explored whether this is also the case for EZH2 protein expression. PATIENTS AND METHODS A tissue microarray (TMA) was created using formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded estrogen receptor (ER)-positive primary breast tumor tissues of 250 MBC patients treated with first-line tamoxifen. Quantity and intensity of EZH2 expression were determined by immunohistochemistry (IHC) and both were used to generate and group scores according to a previously described method for scoring EZH2. RESULTS In total, 116 tumors (46%) were considered to be EZH2 positive. The presence of EZH2 protein expression was significantly associated with progression-free survival (PFS) in both univariate [hazard ratio (HR) 1.51, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.17-1.97, P = 0.002] and multivariate analysis including traditional factors associated with tamoxifen outcome (HR 1.41, 95% CI 1.06-1.88, P = 0.017). Considering quantity irrespective of intensity, tumors with >50% EZH2-positive cells had the worst PFS (HR 2.15, 95% CI 1.42-3.27, P < 0.001), whereas intensity alone did not show a significant association with PFS. Application of other methods of scoring EZH2 positivity resulted in a similar significant association between the amount of EZH2 positive cells and PFS. CONCLUSION In addition to EZH2 mRNA levels, these results suggest that protein expression of EZH2 can be used as a marker to predict outcome to tamoxifen therapy. This provides new rationale to explore EZH2 inhibition in the clinical setting and increases the possibilities for a more personalized treatment approach in MBC patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E A Reijm
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Genomics Netherlands
| | - A M Timmermans
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Genomics Netherlands
| | - M P Look
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Genomics Netherlands
| | | | - C K Stobbe
- Department of PATHAN BV, Laboratory Pathology, Sint Franciscus Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - C H M van Deurzen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Genomics Netherlands; Department of Pathology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam
| | - J W M Martens
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Genomics Netherlands
| | - S Sleijfer
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Genomics Netherlands
| | - J A Foekens
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Genomics Netherlands
| | - P M J J Berns
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Genomics Netherlands.
| | - M P H M Jansen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Genomics Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Dittmer J, Dittmer A, Oerlecke I, Leyh B, Martens JWM, Thomssen C. P5-06-08: Mesenchymal Stem Cells and Carcinoma-Associated Fibroblasts Sensitize Breast Cancer Cells in 3D Cultures to Kinase Inhibitors. Cancer Res 2011. [DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.sabcs11-p5-06-08] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: Bone-derived mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) are attracted to cancer lesions and may differentiate to CAFs. By interacting with cancer cells, MSCs and CAFs may promote cancer progression and modulate drug sensitivity.
Material and Methods: To analyze ability of MSCs and CAFs to modulate drug response, we generated spheroids of MCF-7 or MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells in the absence or presence of human (h) MSCs or hCAFs and tested the susceptibility of the breast cancer cells to three different kinase inhibitors (TKI258, RAD001 and RAF265) as used in cancer therapy.
Results: While MSCs and CAFs did not affect the response of either breast cancer cell line to PDGFR/FGFR/VEGFR inhibitor TKI258, they sensitized breast cancer cells to the mTOR inhibitor RAD001. In MCF-7 cells, this was accompanied by increased apoptosis. hMSCs and to a lesser extent hCAFs also enhanced the cytotoxic effect of RAF inhibitor RAF265 on MDA-MB-231 cells. Searching for the mechanism that underlies the effect of stromal cells on RAF265 response we found that stromal cells inhibited RAF265-induced increase in ERK1/2 phosphorylation, supported RAF265-dependent downregulation of PKCalpha (protein kinase Calpha) and prevented RAF265-induced conversion of LC3B, a marker of autophagy. To mimic the changes in ERK1/2 phosphorylation and PKCalpha expression in response to the stromal cells, we treated cells with MEK1 inhibitor U0126 or PKCalpha inhibitor Gö6976, respectively. U0126, but not Gö6976, was as effective as hMSCs in sensitizing MDA-MB-231 cells to RAF265.
Discussion: Our data suggest that hMSCs and hCAFs increased the cytotoxic effect of RAF265 on MDA-MB-231 cells by downregulating ERK1/2 phosphorylation. In summary, this study shows that hMSCs are able to render breast cancer cells more susceptible to kinase inhibitors and that, to the most part, hCAFs to which hMSCs can differentiate are able to mimic the drug-sensitizing effects of hMSCs.
Citation Information: Cancer Res 2011;71(24 Suppl):Abstract nr P5-06-08.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Dittmer
- 1Clinic for Gynecology University Halle, Germany; Erasmus University Medical Center
| | - A Dittmer
- 1Clinic for Gynecology University Halle, Germany; Erasmus University Medical Center
| | - I Oerlecke
- 1Clinic for Gynecology University Halle, Germany; Erasmus University Medical Center
| | - B Leyh
- 1Clinic for Gynecology University Halle, Germany; Erasmus University Medical Center
| | - JWM Martens
- 1Clinic for Gynecology University Halle, Germany; Erasmus University Medical Center
| | - C Thomssen
- 1Clinic for Gynecology University Halle, Germany; Erasmus University Medical Center
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Duffy MJ, Napieralski R, Martens JWM, Span PN, Spyratos F, Sweep FCGJ, Brunner N, Foekens JA, Schmitt M. Methylated genes as new cancer biomarkers. Eur J Cancer 2009; 45:335-46. [PMID: 19138839 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2008.12.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 76] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/01/2008] [Revised: 12/05/2008] [Accepted: 12/12/2008] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
Aberrant hypermethylation of promoter regions in specific genes is a key event in the formation and progression of cancer. In at least some situations, these aberrant alterations occur early in the formation of malignancy and appear to be tumour specific. Multiple reports have suggested that measurement of the methylation status of the promoter regions of specific genes can aid early detection of cancer, determine prognosis and predict therapy responses. Promising DNA methylation biomarkers include the use of methylated GSTP1 for aiding the early diagnosis of prostate cancer, methylated PITX2 for predicting outcome in lymph node-negative breast cancer patients and methylated MGMT in predicting benefit from alkylating agents in patients with glioblastomas. However, prior to clinical utilisation, these findings require validation in prospective clinical studies. Furthermore, assays for measuring gene methylation need to be standardised, simplified and evaluated in external quality assurance programmes. It is concluded that methylated genes have the potential to provide a new generation of cancer biomarkers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M J Duffy
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Nuclear Medicine Laboratory, St. Vincent's University Hospital, Elm Park, Dublin 4, Ireland.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Span PN, Sieuwerts AM, Heuvel JJTM, Spyratos F, Duffy MJ, Eppenberger-Castori S, Vacher S, O'Brien K, McKiernan E, Pierce A, Vuaroqueaux V, Foekens JA, Sweep FCGJ, Martens JWM. Harmonisation of multi-centre real-time reverse-transcribed PCR results of a candidate prognostic marker in breast cancer: an EU-FP6 supported study of members of the EORTC - PathoBiology Group. Eur J Cancer 2009; 45:74-81. [PMID: 19008094 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2008.09.030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/09/2008] [Revised: 09/11/2008] [Accepted: 09/30/2008] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
AIM Assessment of intra- and inter-laboratory variation in multi-centre real-time reverse-transcribed PCR (qRT-PCR)-based mRNA quantification of a prognostic marker in breast cancer using external quality assurance (EQA). METHODS A questionnaire on the methodologies used and EQA calibrators were sent to 5 participating laboratories from 4 European countries, which measured mRNA levels of PITX2 splice variants and reference genes by qRT-PCR. RESULTS Differences in the methodology included PCR quantification methodology and equipment, RNA extraction and cDNA synthesis procedures. The intra-laboratory coefficient of variation (CV) ranged from 5 to 23%, and the inter-laboratory CV ranged from 17 to 30%. The inter-laboratory CV was reduced to 13% by using prediluted calibrators and by harmonising the data in the central QA laboratory. Additional normalisation using reference genes did not decrease the variation further. CONCLUSIONS Both externally provided calibrators and centralised harmonisation are required to reduce the intra-laboratory variation in multi-centre qRT-PCR results to an acceptable level.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P N Span
- Department of Chemical Endocrinology, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
24
|
Martens JWM, Lumbroso S, Verhoef-Post M, Georget V, Richter-Unruh A, Szarras-Czapnik M, Romer TE, Brunner HG, Themmen APN, Sultan C. Mutant luteinizing hormone receptors in a compound heterozygous patient with complete Leydig cell hypoplasia: abnormal processing causes signaling deficiency. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2002; 87:2506-13. [PMID: 12050206 DOI: 10.1210/jcem.87.6.8523] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
Over the past 5 yr several inactivating mutations in the LH receptor gene have been demonstrated to cause Leydig cell hypoplasia, a rare autosomal recessive form of male pseudohermaphroditism. Here, we report the identification of two new LH receptor mutations in a compound heterozygous case of complete Leydig hypoplasia and determine the cause of the signaling deficiency at a molecular level. On the paternal allele of the patient we identified in codon 343 a T to A transversion that changes a conserved cysteine in the hinge region of the receptor to serine (C343S); on the maternal allele a T to C transition causes another conserved cysteine at codon 543 in trans-membrane segment 5 to be altered to arginine (C543R). Both of these mutant receptors are completely devoid of hormone-induced cAMP reporter gene activation. Using Western blotting of expressed LH receptor protein with a hemagglutinin tag, we further show that despite complete absence of total and cell surface hormone binding, protein levels of both mutant LH receptors are only moderately affected. The expression and study of enhanced green fluorescent protein-tagged receptors confirmed this view and further indicated that initial translocation to the endoplasmic reticulum of these mutant receptors is normal. After that, however, translocation is halted or misrouted, and as a result, neither mutant ever reaches the cell surface, and they cannot bind hormone. This lack of processing is also indicated by reduced presence of an 80-kDa protein, the only N-linked glycosylated protein in the LH receptor protein profile. Thus, complete lack of signaling by the identified mutant LH receptors is caused by insufficient processing from the endoplasmic reticulum to the cell surface and results in complete Leydig cell hypoplasia in this patient.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J W M Martens
- Department of Endocrinology, Erasmus University, 3000 DR Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Richter-Unruh A, Martens JWM, Verhoef-Post M, Wessels HT, Kors WA, Sinnecker GHG, Boehmer A, Drop SLS, Toledo SPA, Brunner HG, Themmen APN. Leydig cell hypoplasia: cases with new mutations, new polymorphisms and cases without mutations in the luteinizing hormone receptor gene. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 2002; 56:103-12. [PMID: 11849253 DOI: 10.1046/j.0300-0664.2001.01437.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 62] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Defective male sex differentiation in patients with hypoplasia of Leydig cells (LCH) is caused by deficient LH receptor signal transduction. To further investigate the variety of LH receptor gene mutations present in LCH patients and their influence on the phenotype, we examined 10 nonrelated patients with the clinical presentation of LCH. PATIENTS AND METHODS Ten patients with a clinical phenotype of LCH were analysed for mutations in the complete coding region of the LH receptor gene. Exons 1-10 and two overlapping fragments of exon 11 of the LH receptor gene including all intron-exon boundaries were amplified by polymerase chain reaction and sequenced. To screen for frequencies of DNA changes, mutation analysis was performed on 45-59 healthy persons using denaturation high-performance liquid chromatography. RESULTS Six new DNA alterations were identified. Three of them appear to be new polymorphisms. A G to C change at the 28th nucleotide of intron 1 on one allele and a heterozygous CGA to CAA transition at codon 124 (R124Q) were found. Both findings in these two patients are polymorphisms that occur with a frequency of 17% and 1.7%, respectively. A silent heterozygous CTA to TTA change at codon 204 was identified. In a patient with micropenis, the analysis revealed a homozygous missense mutation at codon 625 (I625K). As reported previously, this alteration significantly impaired signal transduction and explains the partial phenotype. Finally, in one compound heterozygous patient, two different mutations were discovered. At the polymorphic site in exon 1, a 27-bp insertion (CTG)2 AAG (CTG)5 CAG and a premature stop codon in the transmembrane segment 4 (W491*) were found. Both mutations disrupt signal transduction and explain the complete phenotype of this patient. In five patients, no DNA alterations could be identified. CONCLUSIONS Three mutations (33 bp insertion in exon 1; W491* and I625K) were identified that explain the phenotype in two patients. In addition, most of the patients with the clinical phenotype of LCH did not have causative mutations, suggesting that changes in other regions of the LH receptor gene, such as the large introns or the promoter region, may be responsible for the majority of cases. Alternatively, the displayed phenotype may be the result of other genetic defects. Our work further underscores the importance of thorough clinical analysis of patients before molecular analysis of a particular gene is performed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Richter-Unruh
- Department of Endocrinology and Reproduction, Erasmus University Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|