Early functional postoperative therapy of distal radius fracture with a dynamic orthosis: results of a prospective randomized cross-over comparative study

[Translated article] Immobilisation with compression bandage vs. antebraquial splint in distal radius fractures operated by open reduction and locking plate. Randomised clinical trial

INTRODUCTION

Currently, there is a lack of prospective studies to unify criteria about type and time for postoperative immobilisation in surgical distal radius fractures. The aim of this study is to compare functional and radiological results in two groups of distal radius fractures treated with internal fixation with locking plate, and immobilised with antebrachial splint or compression bandage for 3 weeks.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

A randomised clinical trial was carried out with two parallel groups with 3, 6, and 12 weeks of follow-up. Main and secondary functional variables were measured, such as pain on VAS scale, values on PRWE, DASH and MRS scale, range of motion in flexion-extension, complications, etc. In addition, some radiological variables were measured at preoperative period and one week after surgery, such as union time, dorsal displacement, shortening, ulnar variance, etc. RESULTS: A total of 62 patients were evaluated: 27 immobilised with bandage and 35 with splint. Analysis of the results obtained showed significant differences in both groups for almost all radiological variables from pre to postoperative period, and for all functional variables from 3 to 12 weeks after surgery. No significant differences were found between the two groups for any of the radiological and functional variables evaluated (VAS 3-12 weeks: p=.584; PWRE 3-12 weeks: p=.248; flexion range of motion 3-12 weeks: p=.959; extension range of motion: p=.50; union time: p=.89).

CONCLUSIONS

We do not find clinical or radiological differences between immobilisation with antebrachial splint or compression bandage for distal radius fractures operated with locking plate. A greater number of patients and follow-up are necessary to extrapolate the results to the general population and to establish criteria for good postoperative management of these fractures.

Immobilization with compression bandage vs antebraquial splint in distal radius fractures operated by open reduction and locking plate. Randomized clinical trial

INTRODUCTION

Currently, there is a lack of prospective studies to unify criteria about type and time for postoperative immobilization in surgical distal radius fractures. The aim of this study is to compare functional and radiological results in two groups of distal radius fractures treated with internal fixation with locking plate, and immobilized with antebrachial splint or compression bandage for 3weeks.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

A randomized clinical trial was carried out with two parallel groups with 3, 6, and 12weeks of follow-up. Main and secondary functional variables were measured, such as pain on VAS scale, values on PRWE, DASH and MRS scale, range of motion in flexion-extension, complications, etc. In addition, some radiological variables were measured at preoperative period and one week after surgery, such as union time, dorsal displacement, shortening, ulnar variance, etc. RESULTS: A total of 62 patients were evaluated: 27 immobilized with bandage and 35 with splint. Analysis of the results obtained showed significant differences in both groups for almost all radiological variables from pre to postoperative period, and for all functional variables from 3 to 12weeks after surgery. No significant differences were found between the two groups for any of the radiological and functional variables evaluated (VAS 3-12weeks: P=.584; PWRE 3-12weeks: P=.248; flexion range of motion 3-12weeks: P=.959; extension range of motion: P=.50; union time: P=.89).

CONCLUSIONS

We do not find clinical or radiological differences between immobilization with antebrachial splint or compression bandage for distal radius fractures operated with locking plate. A greater number of patients and follow-up are necessary to extrapolate the results to the general population and to establish criteria for good postoperative management of these fractures.

Is Postoperative Splinting Advantageous After Upper Extremity Fracture Surgery? Results From the Arm Splint Pain Improvement Research Experiment

OBJECTIVES

The authors report no conflict of interest.To determine if short-term immobilization with a rigid long arm plaster elbow splint after surgery of the arm, elbow, or forearm results in superior outcomes compared with a soft dressing with early motion.

METHODS

DESIGN

Prospective Randomized Control Trial.

SETTING

Academic Medical Center.

PATIENT SELECTION CRITERIA

Patients undergoing operative treatment for a mid-diaphysis or distal humerus, elbow, or forearm fracture were consented and randomized according to the study protocol for postoperative application of a rigid elbow splint (10-14 days in a plaster Sugar Tong Splint for forearm fracture or a Long Arm plaster Splint for 10-14 for all others) or soft dressing and allowing immediate free range of elbow and wrist motion (range of motion [ROM]).

OUTCOME MEASURES AND COMPARISONS

Self-reported pain (visual analog score or VAS), Healthscale (0-100, 100 denoting excellent health), and physical function (EuroQol 5 Dimension or EQ-5D) surveyed on postoperative days 1-5 and 14 were compared between groups. Patient-reported pain score (0-10, 10 denoting highest satisfaction) at week 6, time to fracture union, ultimate disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand score, and elbow ROM were also collected for analysis. Incidence of complications were assessed.

RESULTS

Hundred patients (38 men to 62 women with a mean age of 55.7 years) were included. Over the first 5 days and again at postop day 14, the splint cohort reported a higher "Healthscale" from 0 to 100 than the nonsplint group on all study days ( P = 0.041). There was no difference in reported pain between the 2 study groups over the same interval ( P = 0.161 and 0.338 for least and worst pain, respectively), and both groups reported similar rates of treatment satisfaction ( P = 0.30). Physical function ( P = 0.67) and rates of wound problems ( P = 0.27) were similar. Additionally, the mean time to fracture healing was similar for the splint and control groups (4.6 ± 2.8 vs. 4.0 ± 2.2 months, P = 0.34). Ultimate elbow ROM was similar between the study groups ( P = 0.48, P = 0.49, P = 0.61, and P = 0.51 for elbow extension, flexion, pronation, and supination, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Free range of elbow motion without splinting produced similar results compared with elbow immobilization after surgical intervention for a fracture to the humerus, elbow, and forearm. There was no difference in patient-reported pain outcomes, wound problems, or elbow ROM. Immobilized patients reported slightly higher "healthscale" ratings than nonsplinted patients and, however, reported similar rates of satisfaction. Both treatment strategies are acceptable after upper extremity fracture surgery.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level I. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Validation of Temperature Sensors to Monitor Thermoplastic Splint Wear in Hand Surgery Patients

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to validate the use of temperature sensors to accurately measure thermoplastic volar forearm splint wear in a healthy cohort of volunteers using 5- and 15-minute temperature measurement intervals.

METHODS

A prospective diagnostic study was performed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of temperature sensors in monitoring splint wear in 8 healthy volunteers between December 2022 and June 2023. Temperature sensors were molded into thermoplastic volar forearm splints. Volunteers who were familiar with the study aims were asked to keep an exact log of the time spent wearing the splint ("actual wear time"). Sensors recorded temperatures every 5 or 15 minutes, and separate algorithms were developed to determine the sensor-detected wear time compared with the actual wear time as the gold standard. The algorithms were then externally validated with the total population.

RESULTS

The 5-minute and 15-minute algorithms demonstrated excellent sensitivity (99.1% vs 96.6%), specificity (99.9% vs 99.9%), positive (99.4% vs 99.5%) and negative (99.9% vs 99.3%) predictive value, and diagnostic accuracy (99.8% vs 99.3%), respectively. The 5-minute algorithm recorded 99.5% of the total splint hours, whereas the 15-minute algorithm recorded 96.1%. There was no significant difference between the actual time per wear session (5.4 ± 2.7 hours) and the time estimated by the 5-minute algorithm (5.4 ± 2.6 hours; P = .40), but there was a significant difference for the 15-minute algorithm (5.2 ± 2.6 hours; P < .001).

CONCLUSION

Temperature sensors can be used to accurately monitor thermoplastic volar forearm splint wear.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Diagnostic II.

Outcome Analysis of Distal Radius Fracture with Orthosis Versus Cast Immobilization after Palmar Plate Osteosynthesis: A Randomized Controlled Study

Although the benefits of hand orthoses were shown in previous studies, they have not been able to establish themselves in clinical routines. With a focus on patient satisfaction, this study aimed to evaluate the latest generation of hand orthoses after palmar plate osteosynthesis for isolated distal radius fractures in comparison with circular plaster casts. 50 patients (16% dropout rate) were randomly assigned to an orthotic group (immobilization by orthosis, OG) or a control group (immobilization by a plaster cast, CG). Intra-articular fractures were present in 74% of the cases, and unstable AO C3 fractures in 26%. Questionnaires on patient satisfaction, documentation of the time required, clinical scores (DASH, SF-36), range of motion, grip measurements and radiographs were used for evaluation. The OG proved to be equivalent to the plaster treatment in terms of patient satisfaction, and stability of the reduction, as well as clinical scores DASH and SF-36. The OG was even superior in terms of personal hygiene (p = 0.011), handling (p = 0.008) and better adaptability (p = 0.013). Significantly less time was required to apply the orthosis (p < 0.001). In addition to the good results achieved so far, the study showed that the latest generation of orthoses has several advantages over plaster cast therapy, and could therefore become established in everyday clinical practice.

Brace versus cast following surgical treatment of distal radial fracture: a prospective randomised study comparing quality of recovery

Background: Immobilisation following surgical treatment of distal radial fractures (DRF) is traditionally performed with a dorsal cast splint. There is an interest in changing the rigid cast to a removable brace. This can reduce the risk for cast-corrections, complications and improve recovery of function.

The aim of the study was to compare quality of recovery (QoR) between brace and traditional cast for immobilisation during the first postoperative week.

Methods: 60 patients with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status 1–3, scheduled for surgical treatment of DRF under a supraclavicular block (SCB) in a day-surgery setting were randomised into two groups of immobilisation post-surgery; brace (n=30) versus traditional cast (n=30). Study objectives were: differences in self-assessed QoR using the QoR-15 questionnaire, postoperative oral oxycodone consumption, perioperative time events and unplanned healthcare contacts one week postoperatively.

Results: 54 patients, 46 females/eight males were included in the analysis; 27 with brace and 27 with traditional cast. QoR-15 median scores improved significantly from baseline/preoperative to day 7 (brace p=0.001, cast p=0.001) with no differences between the two groups. The only difference found was that patients in the brace group had significantly worse pain score 24-hours post-surgery (p=0.022). No significant differences were seen in total median oxycodone consumption the first three postoperative days. No differences were found in perioperative events or unplanned healthcare contacts.

Conclusions: Brace appears to be a feasible option to traditional cast for immobilisation following surgical treatment of DRF. The early QoR was similar in both groups apart from more pain in the brace group the first 24 postoperative hours.

Early Mobilization Versus Splinting After Surgical Management of Distal Radius Fractures

BACKGROUND

After the surgical management of distal radius fractures (DRF) in older patients, further treatment with a splint often follows. It is unclear whether early mobilization might be superior to splinting in this group of patients, as it is in others. In this prospective, randomized, controlled trial, we attempted to determine whether early mobilization yields better outcomes.

METHODS

50 patients over age 70 with DRF were included in the trial. Group A (the splint group) was treated with postoperative immobilization, group B with early mobilization. Clinical follow-up examinations were performed at 2, 6, and 12 weeks and at 6 and 12 months. X-rays were obtained preoperatively, postoperatively, at 6 weeks, and at 6 months. The primary outcome parameter was the modified Mayo Wrist Score (MMWS) at 6 weeks.

RESULTS

At 6 weeks, the functional outcome was better to a statistically significant extent in group B (MMWS; 65/100 vs. 55/100 [q25 : 55/40 - q75 : 70/70; p = 0.025]). No difference between the two groups was demonstrable in their further clinical course. The estimated regression model revealed a statistically significant effect of the method of treatment (p = 0.023). There were no differences in hand strength or in x-ray findings.

DISCUSION

Early mobilization is associated with better wrist function on initial follow-up, without any demonstrable disadvantage with respect to secondary dislocation. The psychological benefit and protective function of wrist splinting in patients who are in danger of falling should nonetheless be investigated in further studies.

Splinting after Distal Radius Fracture Fixation: A Prospective Cohort Analysis of Postoperative Plaster Splint versus Soft Dressing

Background  The effect of postoperative dressing and splinting after distal radius fracture (DRF) open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) is not well understood. A prospective cohort analysis was performed to assess differences in functional and radiographic outcomes with the use of plaster splinting or soft dressing following DRF ORIF. Methods  All patients undergoing DRF ORIF with locking volar plates were consecutively enrolled. Preoperative demographic and postoperative radiographic and functional outcome data were collected at 2 weeks and 3 months postoperatively. Functional data included range of motion (ROM), pain on visual analog scale (VAS), Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE), and quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) scores. Radiographic data included loss of fracture reduction. Results  A total of 139 patients were enrolled (79 plaster splinting, 60 soft dressing). By the first postoperative visit (POV), there was one case of loss of reduction with plaster splinting and one case with soft dressing with no hardware failure or revision surgery in either group, and no difference in DASH, PRWE, or VAS pain scores. By the final POV, the soft dressing group showed greater ROM in extension by 9.6, flexion by 10.9, and supination by 4.8 degrees over plaster splinting. Additionally, the soft dressing group demonstrated statistically significant improvement in PRWE and DASH scores, as well as VAS pain scores as compared with plaster splinting. Conclusions  Applying only soft dressing following DRF ORIF demonstrated improvements in ROM, VAS, and functional outcomes by final follow-up, with no significant differences in radiographic outcomes. No benefit of applying a plaster splint was identified.

A Comparison of the Effect of One, Three, or Six Weeks of Immobilization on Function and Pain After Open Reduction and Internal Fixation of Distal Radial Fractures in Adults: A Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

The optimum period of immobilization following open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of distal radial fractures has not been established.

METHODS

One hundred and thirty-three adults with a distal radial fracture treated with ORIF (using a volar locked plate) were randomly allocated, with stratification according to age, to 1, 3, or 6 weeks of postoperative immobilization in a parallel-design, assessor-blinded, randomized controlled trial (RCT). After cast removal, a standardized education and exercise program was followed for 6 weeks. Primary outcomes were function (according to the Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation [PRWE]), worst (visual analog scale [VAS]-W) and usual (VAS-U) pain in the past week, and active wrist extension and forearm supination range of motion. All measures were recorded at 6, 12, and 26 weeks following surgery. Secondary outcomes were wrist flexion, radial deviation, ulnar deviation, and forearm pronation active range of motion; function (Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand [DASH]); grip strength; postoperative adverse events; return to work and/or usual daily activities; and compliance with the home exercise program.

RESULTS

More than 90% of the participants received treatment as allocated, and 87% completed the 6-month follow-up. At 6 weeks, both the 1-week and 3-week groups had significantly better PRWE scores, wrist extension, and flexion active range of motion than the 6-week group. However, no treatment group was superior to another with respect to primary or secondary outcomes at 12 weeks or 6 months following surgery. Analyses considering only the main effect of the intervention group indicated a preference for the 3-week group, which performed significantly better than the 6-week group with respect to the PRWE, pain (VAS-W and VAS-U), wrist flexion, ulnar deviation, forearm pronation active range of motion, and DASH score.

CONCLUSIONS

For patient function, range of motion, and pain, this investigation demonstrated that immobilization periods of 1 and 3 weeks produced superior short-term outcomes compared with those after 6 weeks of immobilization. These differences were not evident at 3 and 6 months following surgery, with the immobilization period having no significant effect on long-term function, range of motion, or pain. There were no significant differences in adverse events associated with shorter immobilization periods.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level I. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Prescribed exercise programs may not be effective in reducing impairments and improving activity during upper limb fracture rehabilitation: a systematic review

QUESTION

What is the effect of exercise on increasing participation and activity levels and reducing impairment in the rehabilitation of people with upper limb fractures?

DESIGN

Systematic review of controlled trials.

PARTICIPANTS

Adults following an upper limb fracture.

INTERVENTION

Any exercise therapy program, including trials where exercise was delivered to both groups provided that the groups received different amounts of exercise.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Impairments of body structure and function, activity limitations and participation restrictions.

RESULTS

Twenty-two trials were identified that evaluated 1299 participants with an upper limb fracture. There was insufficient evidence from 13 trials to support or refute the effectiveness of home exercise therapy compared with therapist-supervised exercise or therapy that included exercise following distal radius or proximal humeral fractures. There was insufficient evidence from three trials to support or refute the effectiveness of exercise therapy compared with advice/no exercise intervention following distal radius fracture. There was moderate evidence from five trials (one examining distal radius fracture, one radial head fracture, and three proximal humeral fracture) to support commencing exercise early and reducing immobilisation in improving activity during upper limb rehabilitation compared with delayed exercise and mobilisation. There was preliminary evidence from one trial that exercise to the non-injured arm during immobilisation might lead to short-term benefits on increasing grip strength and range of movement following distal radius fracture. Less than 40% of included trials reported adequate exercise program descriptions to allow replication according to the TIDieR checklist.

CONCLUSION

There is emerging evidence that current prescribed exercise regimens may not be effective in reducing impairments and improving activity following an upper limb fracture. Starting exercise early combined with a shorter immobilisation period is more effective than starting exercise after a longer immobilisation period.

REGISTRATION

CRD42016041818. [Bruder AM, Shields N, Dodd KJ, Taylor NF (2017) Prescribed exercise programs may not be effective in reducing impairments and improving activity during upper limb fracture rehabilitation: a systematic review. Journal of Physiotherapy 63: 205-220].

Efecto de las intervenciones fisioterapéuticas en personas con fractura distal de radio

Introducción. La fractura distal de radio (FDR) es muy frecuente y afecta a todos los grupos poblacionales.Objetivo. Realizar una revisión sistemática de la mejor evidencia disponible para determinar el efecto de las intervenciones fisioterapéuticas sobre el dolor, el rango de movimiento, la fuerza muscular y la funcionalidad en personas con fractura distal de radio.Materiales y métodos. Se realizó una búsqueda sistemática de ensayos clínicos controlados en las bases de datos ScienceDirect, PubMed, Medline y Embase.Resultados. Se encontraron 14 estudios que cumplieron los criterios de selección.Conclusión. La evidencia sugiere que intervenciones terapéuticas supervisadas que incluyan modalidades físicas y del ejercicio con una duración entre 6 y 9 semanas, con un promedio de 18 sesiones y realizadas tres veces a la semana mejoran de forma significativa las variables estudiadas en pacientes con FDR. Es necesario que futuros estudios establezcan la relación dosis-respuesta de estas intervenciones.

[Design of distal radius volar locking plates : Anatomical, surgical and biomechanical aspects]

The operative treatment of unstable distal radius fractures primarily aims for the anatomical reduction of the joint while addressing accompanying injuries. Anatomical reduction, stable fixation and early functional movement of the joint are the three cornerstones of modern treatment concepts of distal radius fractures. Distal radius volar locking plates play a major role in the treatment and rehabilitation of the most commonly occurring fracture in humans. This article outlines the different principles in the current design of available distal radius volar locking plates. The biomechanical aspects, anatomical findings and clinical evaluation that have influenced current design features and trends in new developments of the latest plates are emphasized. This is an ongoing process that is supported through the investigation and feedback of clinical science.