Survival of proper hepatic artery lymph node metastasis in patients with gastric cancer: implications for D2 lymphadenectomy

Is No. 12a Lymph Node Dissection Compliance Necessary in Patients Who Undergo D2 Gastrectomy for Gastric Adenocarcinomas? A Population-Based Retrospective Propensity Score Matching Study

LN dissection is essential for accurately staging and improving GC patient prognosis. However, the compliance rate for No. 12a LND in practice is low, and its necessity is controversial. Data from GC patients who underwent total gastrectomy (TG)/distal gastrectomy (DG) plus D2 lymphadenectomy between January 2000 and December 2017 at West China Hospital, Sichuan University were reviewed. No. 12a LND noncompliance's effect on the long-term prognosis of patients with GC after D2 gastrectomy was explored. Of the 2788 patients included, No. 12a LND noncompliance occurred in 1753 patients (62.9%). Among 1035 patients with assessable LNs from station 12a, 98 (9.5%) had positive LNs detected at station 12a. No. 12a LN metastasis patients (stage IV not included) had significantly better overall survival (OS) than TNM stage IV patients (p = 0.006). Patients with No. 12a LND compliance had a significantly higher OS than those without, both before (p < 0.001) and after (p < 0.001) PSM. Cox multivariate analysis confirmed that No. 12a LND noncompliance was an independent prognostic factor before (HR 1.323, 95% CI 1.171-1.496, p < 0.001) and after (HR 1.353, 95% CI 1.173-1.560, p < 0.001) PSM. In conclusion, noncompliance with No. 12a LND compromised the long-term survival of patients who underwent D2 gastrectomy for GC.

Exploring the scope of 4sb and 12a lymph node dissection for cT2-4 lower third gastric cancer: Study protocol for a prospective cohort trial

Background

Currently, the extent of 4sb and 12a lymph node dissection is not clear and is based on the personal understanding of the surgeon. It may result in damage to the splenic artery and portal vein, leading to surgical complications. Therefore, this study aims to explore the scope of 4sb and 12a lymph node dissection in cT2-4 lower third gastric cancer.

Methods

This is an ongoing prospective cohort trial. The total sample size required for the trial (March 2022 to February 2025) is approximately 524 patients. The participants are divided into the experimental (4sb first branch and 12a anterior lymphadenectomy) or control groups (traditional 4sb and 12a lymphadenectomy). Electronic data capture systems will be used to collect demographic, laboratory test, auxiliary examination, operation, postoperative condition, postoperative pathology, and follow-up data. The primary outcome is the 12a lymph node metastatic rate. Secondary outcomes include the pathology (consisting of the 4sb lymph node metastatic rate, the number of 4sb lymph nodes dissected, the number of 12a lymph nodes dissected and tumor pathological staging), a safety evaluation index (consisting of complications and mortality ≤30 days after surgery), an efficacy evaluation (consisting of operation data and postoperative recovery status), and follow-up data (consisting of 3-year or 5-year disease-free survival and overall survival).

Discussion

By exploring the scope of 4sb and 12a lymph node dissection on the premise of ensuring radical cure of the tumor, the operation is simplified, the operation time is shortened, the damage of important blood vessels is reduced, the intraoperative and postoperative complications are reduced, and the patient recovers as soon as possible. Our study is a prospective exploration of the pathology, safety, efficacy, and prognosis of the new and traditional methods of 4sb and 12a lymph node dissection.

Trial registration

Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, ChiCTR2200057698 (registration date: March 15, 2022).

Risk of station 12a lymph node metastasis in patients with lower-third gastric cancer

BACKGROUND

Controversy over the issue that No. 12a lymph node involvement is distant or regional metastasis remains, and the possible inclusion of 12a lymph nodes in D2 lymphadenectomy is unclear. As reported, gastric cancer (GC) located in the lower third is highly related to the metastasis of station 12a lymph nodes.

AIM

To investigate whether the clinicopathological factors and metastasis status of other perigastric nodes can predict station 12a lymph node metastasis and evaluate the prognostic significance of station 12a lymph node dissection in patients with lower-third GC.

METHODS

A total of 147 patients with lower-third GC who underwent D2 or D2+ lymphadenectomy, including station 12a lymph node dissection, were included in this retrospective study from June 2003 to March 2011. Survival prognoses were compared between patients with or without station 12a lymph node metastasis. Logistic regression analyses were used to clarify the association between station 12a lymph node metastasis and clinicopathological factors or metastasis status of other perigastric nodes. The metastasis status of each regional lymph node was evaluated to identify the possible predictors of station 12a lymph node metastasis.

RESULTS

Metastasis to station 12a lymph nodes was observed in 18 patients with lower-third GC, but not in 129 patients. The incidence of station 12a lymph node involvement was reported as 12.2% in patients with lower-third GC. The overall survival of patients without station 12a lymph node metastasis was significantly better than that of patients with station 12a metastasis (P < 0.001), which could also be seen in patients with or without extranodal soft tissue invasion. Station 12a lymph node metastasis and extranodal soft tissue invasion were identified as independent predictors of poor prognosis in patients with lower-third GC. Advanced pN stage was defined as independent risk factor significantly correlated with station 12a lymph node positivity. Station 3 lymph node staus was also proven to be significantly correlated with station 12a lymph node involvement.

CONCLUSION

Metastasis of station 12a lymph nodes could be considered an independent prognosis factor for patients with lower-third GC. The dissection of station 12a lymph nodes may not be ignored in D2 or D2+ lymphadenectomy due to difficulties in predicting station 12a lymph node metastasis.

Pattern of No. 12a lymph node metastasis in gastric cancer

Objective

The current standard D2 lymphadenectomy for gastric cancer (GC) includes dissection of lymph nodes (LNs) along the proper hepatic artery (No. 12a), however, the survival benefit remains controversial. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the pattern of No. 12a LN metastasis (LNM) in GC and explore the indications for No. 12a LN dissection.

Methods

Medical records of 413 consecutive GC patients who underwent curative surgery in Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University between January 2015 and December 2018 were enrolled and reviewed retrospectively. The correlation between No. 12a LNM and clinicopathologic characteristics of patients was analyzed.

Results

The overall incidence of No. 12a LNM was 2.67% (11/413). Tumor location (P=0.012), depth of tumor infiltration (P<0.01) and N stage (P=0.018) were significant factors associated with No. 12a LNM. All the tumors with No. 12a LNM involved the lower third of the stomach and were in T3−4 stages. Patients with No. 12a LNM had extensive LNM than those without (20.91±4.25vs. 5.0±0.54, P<0.001). For advanced GC patients (stage III/IV) with tumors involving the lower third of the stomach, the incidence of No. 12a LNM increased to 10.7% (11/103). Patients with No. 12a LNM had a significantly poorer recurrence-free survival (RFS) (P=0.005) and overall survival (OS) (P=0.017). According to the result of multivariable Cox regression, No. 12a LNM was not an independent impact factor on RFS and OS.

Conclusions

The overall incidence of No. 12a LNM was low but it was much higher in GC patients who had very advanced tumors involving the lower third of the stomach. No. 12a LN dissection should be considered for these patients to improve the survival outcomes.

Comparison of long term survival outcomes between D1+ and D2 lymph node dissection for ≥ pT2 or pN+ gastric carcinoma: A large scale case-control study using propensity score matching

BACKGROUND

D2 lymph node dissection (LND) is a widely performed as a standard procedure for advanced gastric cancer (AGC). However, there is little evidence supporting D2 over D1+ LND for gastric cancer treatment. This study compared the long-term outcomes of D2 and D1+ LND for AGC.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed data on 1121 patients who underwent curative distal gastrectomy and had pathologic stage of ≥ pT2 or pN+. The patients were categorized into the D1+ and D2 LND groups, and long-term survival was compared in the original and propensity score matching (PSM) cohorts.

RESULTS

Overall, 909 and 212 patients underwent D2 and D1+ LND, respectively. The D2 group showed more advanced stage and more frequently underwent open surgery. Postoperative morbidity was significantly higher in the D2 group (19.5% vs. 13.2%, p = 0.034); however, mortality or ≥ grade III complications did not significantly differ between the groups. The 5-year overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) did not significantly differ between D2 and D1+ groups at the same stage. Multivariate analysis of prognostic factors revealed that the extent of LND did not significantly affect survival, after adjusting for tumor stage and other clinicopathological factors. In the PSM cohort, the D2 and D1 groups showed no significant difference in OS (p = 0.488) and DFS (p = 0.705).

CONCLUSIONS

Long-term survival with D1+ LND was comparable to that with D2 LND for ≥ pT2 or pN + gastric carcinoma. A large randomized trial is warranted to validate the optimal extent of LND for gastric carcinoma.

Laparoscopic D2 plus complete mesogastrium excision using the "enjoyable space" approach versus conventional D2 total gastrectomy for local advanced gastric cancer: short-term outcomes

Introduction

Laparoscopy-assisted radical total gastrectomy is technically demanding.

Aim

To introduce the “enjoyable space” approach to achieve D2 plus complete mesogastrium excision (CME) and to investigate its safety and feasibility.

Material and methods

Between January 2015 and December 2017, 165 patients with primary advanced upper gastric cancer underwent laparoscopy-assisted radical total gastrectomy. Among these patients, 81 underwent conventional D2 total gastrectomy (D2 group) and 84 underwent D2 plus CME total gastrectomy (D2 + CME group). Clinicopathological characteristics, surgical outcomes and postoperative complications were compared between the two groups.

Results

There were no significant differences between the two groups (p > 0.05) in clinicopathological characteristics. However, the D2 + CME group had a longer mean operative time, lower mean blood loss and slightly higher mean number of retrieved lymph nodes (LNs) than the D2 group (p < 0.05 each). The mean time to first flatus, liquid diet, and soft diet and the duration of hospital stay were similar between the two groups (p > 0.05 each). No significant difference in postoperative complication rates was found between the groups (16.0% vs. 9.5%, p > 0.05).

Conclusions

The “enjoyable space” approach is an option to achieve D2 + CME, and its safety and feasibility over conventional method are confirmed with lower intraoperative blood loss and more harvested LNs.

Optimal management of resected gastric cancer

Although advances in medical treatment for gastric cancer (GC) have been made, surgery remains the mainstay of cure for patients with localized disease. Improvement in surgical modalities leads to increased chance of cure for resected patients, but a non-negligible number of patients eventually relapse. On this basis, it has been hypothesized that the addition of complementary systemic or local treatments (such as chemotherapy and radiotherapy) could help in improving patients' survival by reducing the risk of recurrence. Several studies have tried to identify the best approach in localized GC: some of them have assessed the role of perioperative chemotherapy [CT] with different drug combinations, while others have focused on the benefit obtained by addition of radiotherapy, whose role is still under investigation. In particular, the role of chemoradiotherapy, both in adjuvant and neoadjuvant settings, is still uncertain. In the last few years, several clinicopathological and molecular factors have been investigated and identified as potential prognostic markers in GC. Many of these factors could have influenced the outcome of patients receiving combined treatments in the abovementioned studies. Patients have not been generally distinguished by the site of disease (esophageal, gastric and junctional cancers) and surgical approach, making data difficult to be interpreted. The purpose of this review was to shed light on these highly controversial topics.

The survival benefit and safety of No. 12a lymphadenectomy for gastric cancer patients with distal or total gastrectomy

There has still not been a consensus in aspects of survival benefit and safety on No.12a lymph nodes (LNs) dissection for gastric cancer patients. This study was aimed to evaluate this issue for patients with distal or total gastrectomy. Patients were retrospectively divided into 12aD+ group (with No.12a dissection) and 12aD–group (without No.12a dissection). Clinicopathologic characteristics, survival rate, morbidity and mortality were compared. There were 670 patients in 12aD+ group, while 567 in 12aD–group. The baselines between the two groups were comparable. The No.12a LNs metastasis ratio was 11.6% and higher in lower third tumor. The metastasis of No.5 LNs, N stage and M stage were correlated to metastasis of No.12a LNs. There was no difference in morbidity nor mortality between the two groups. The 5-year overall survival rates (5-y OS) were 59.6% and 55.1% in 12aD+ group and 12aD–group respectively (P = 0.075). The 5-y OS of patients with negative and positive No.12a LNs were 62.3% and 24.1%. The survival of stage III patients with No.12a positive was better than that of stage IV patients. The 5-y OS were better in 12aD+ group for patients with ages more than 60, lower third tumor, distal gastrectomy, N3 status, or III stages compared with 12aD–group. No.12a lymphadenectomy was independently better prognostic factors for stage III patients. No.12a LNs metastasis should not be considered as distant metastasis. No.12a lymphadenectomy can be performed safely and should be indicated for potentially curable progressive stage tumors requiring distal gastrectomy and might be reserved in patients with stage I or II, or upper third tumor.

Prognostic implication of hepatoduodenal ligament lymph nodes in gastric cancer

There has been controversy regarding whether hepatoduodenal lymph node (HDLN) metastasis in gastric cancer is distant or regional metastasis. HDLN positivity was classified as distant metastasis in the 7th American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) classification, but it was reclassified as regional lymph node metastasis in the 8th AJCC classification. The aim of our study is to verify prognostic significance of HDLN metastasis in gastric cancer.This retrospective study enrolled patients with gastric cancer who underwent D2 gastrectomy from January 2007 to June 2010. HDLN was classified as a regional lymph node.Total number of patients was 3175; 143 (4.5%) of them had HDLN metastasis. The HDLN positivity was significantly associated with older age, more advanced tumor stage, undifferentiated histologic type, and pathologic diagnosis of lymphatic, vascular, and perineural invasions. Five-year survival rate of HDLN-positive patients with stages I to III disease was significantly higher than that of stage IV group (59.3% vs 18.8%, P = 0.001). In patients with stage III disease, 5-year survival rate of HDLN-positive group was significantly lower than that of HDLN-negative group (51.7% vs 66.3%, P = 0.001). Multivariate analysis showed that HDLN metastasis was an independent prognostic factor.HDLN has a different prognostic significance from other regional lymph nodes in advanced stage of gastric cancer though its positivity is not considered as distant metastasis. HDLN positivity itself seems to be an independent prognostic factor in gastric cancer, and the survival outcomes of patients with stage III disease need to be reconsidered according to HDLN positivity.

Scope definition and resection significance of No. 12a group lymph nodes in gastric cancer

A discrepancy exists between the 7th edition guidelines of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) and the 3rd edition Japanese treatment guidelines in terms of the classification of No. 12a lymph nodes as regional or distant lymph nodes in D2 lymphadenectomy for gastric cancer. The scope definition of No. 12a lymph nodes has yet to be fully elucidated. The present study aimed to assess the appropriateness of reclassifying No. 12a lymph node metastasis as distant metastasis according to the survival rate outcome, and to provide a clear and practical definition of the No. 12a group lymph nodes of gastric cancer. A retrospective analysis was performed on patients with gastric cancer who underwent standard or greater lymphadenectomy between January 2000 and December 2009 to find an association between No. 12a node metastasis and survival outcome. The present study first presented a clear and practical scope definition of the No. 12a group lymph nodes of gastric cancer, according to our clinical experiences and practices (Table I and Fig. 1). The survival outcome of patients with gastric cancer and No. 12a lymph node metastasis was poorer compared with that of patients with no No. 12a lymph node metastasis (P=0.0003). The results were similar in stage III patients with gastric cancer (P<0.0001). However, the survival outcome of patients was similar with or without No. 12a lymph node metastasis in stage IV gastric cancer (P=0.1968). Cox regression analysis revealed that the AJCC stage was independently associated with an unfavorable cumulative survival rate. Logistic regression analysis revealed that tumor location, AJCC stage, intravascular cancer emboli and nerve invasion were associated with No. 12a lymph node metastasis. In conclusion, the data in the present study suggested that No. 12a lymph node metastasis is associated with distant metastasis, and therefore they concur with the 7th edition AJCC gastric cancer guidelines, which appear to be correct in terms of considering No. 12a lymph node metastasis as distant metastasis.