Postmastectomy radiotherapy improves disease-free survival of high risk of locoregional recurrence breast cancer patients with T1-2 and 1 to 3 positive nodes

Radiation-induced exosomal miR-21 enhances tumor proliferation and invasiveness in breast cancer: implications for poor prognosis in radiotherapy patients

Radiotherapy is widely used as an effective non-surgical strategy to control malignant tumors. However, recurrence is one of common causes of treatment failure even after the effective radiotherapy. In this study, we focused on the effects of radiation-induced exosomal miR-21 on the tumor microenvironment to investigate the causes of recurrence. Analysis of the TCGA database revealed that breast cancer patients with high levels of miR-21 have significantly reduced overall survival when treated with radiotherapy compared to those who did not receive radiotherapy, indicating a high hazard ratio for miR-21 in patients undergoing this treatment. Additionally, exosomal miR-21 is found to be highly expressed in the serum of breast adenocarcinoma patients. To explore how miR-21 induces poor prognosis in irradiated breast cancer, we irradiated 4T1 cell line with low or high doses of radiation, and examined the impact of secreted exosomal miR-21 on breast cancer cell and tumor microenvironment. After 10 Gy irradiation, 4T1 cells secreted 2.20 ± 0.10 times more exosomes and exhibited a 1.85 ± 0.01-fold increase in exosomal miR-21 levels. Treatment with exosomes from 10 Gy-irradiated cancer cells led to enhanced tumor cell proliferation, wound healing, and migration. The survival rate of 10 Gy-irradiated tumor cells incubated with 10 Gy-derived exosomes increased by 2.83-fold. Moreover, the growth of subcutaneous tumors treated with 10 Gy exosomes (n = 13) was significantly faster compared to tumors treated with 0 Gy exosomes (n = 10, P < 0.05). In summary, our study revealed high-dose irradiation-induced exosomes were found to enhance tumor proliferation and invasiveness via the transfer of exosomal miR-21. Based on these findings, we suggest that radiation-induced exosomal miR-21 may contribute to a poorer prognosis of breast cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy.

Postmastectomy radiotherapy in patients with T1-2N1 breast cancer: a single center experience and a meta-analysis

PURPOSE

Postmastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT) in patients with T1-2N1 breast cancer is still controversial. This study was to evaluate the survival prognosis of T1-2N1 patients with or without PMRT.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From January 2006 to May 2017, 2606 female breast cancer patients underwent mastectomy in our medical center, among whom 402 patients of T1-2N1 stage with or without PMRT were finally analyzed. The median follow-up duration was 59.5 months. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). The secondary endpoint was disease-free survival (DFS).

RESULTS

In the study of our center, no statistically significant difference was observed between the T1-2N1 PMRT and non-PMRT subgroups for the 5-year OS (94.4% vs 95.4%, p = 0.667) and DFS (90.1% vs. 91.1%, p = 0.798). By the date of the last follow-up, 8.96% (n = 36) of the patients experienced any recurrence. Univariate analysis revealed that PMRT was not a prognostic factor for either OS (p = 0.667) or DFS (p = 0.798) in T1-2N1 patients. We then did a meta-analysis on the current treatment patterns, in which 2606 PMRT and 4281 non-PMRT T1-2N1 breast cancer patients with mastectomy were included. The meta-analysis showed that PMRT didn't improve the OS of the patients (HR = 0.85, p = 0.11), but patients with PMRT had better DFS than those in the non-PMRT group (HR = 0.62, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

PMRT did not affect the survival of T1-2N1 breast cancer patients who underwent mastectomy, suggesting that radiotherapy may be safely omitted for them.

Robustness of VMAT to setup errors in postmastectomy radiotherapy of left-sided breast cancer: Impact of bolus thickness

BACKGROUND

Volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) with varied bolus thicknesses has been employed in postmastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT) of breast cancer to improve superficial target coverage. However, impact of bolus thickness on plan robustness remains unclear.

METHODS

The study enrolled ten patients with left-sided breast cancer who received radiotherapy using VMAT with 5 mm and 10 mm bolus (VMAT-5B and VMAT-10B). Inter-fractional setup errors were simulated by introducing a 3 mm shift to isocenter of the original plans in the anterior-posterior, left-right, and inferior-superior directions. The plans (perturbed plans) were recalculated without changing other parameters. Dose volume histograms (DVH) were collected for plan evaluation. Absolute dose differences in DVH endpoints for the clinical target volume (CTV), heart, and left lung between the perturbed plans and the original ones were used for robustness analysis.

RESULTS

VMAT-10B showed better target coverage, while VMAT-5B was superior in organs-at-risk (OARs) sparing. As expected, small setup errors of 3 mm could induce dose fluctuations in CTV and OARs. The differences in CTV were small in VMAT-5B, with a maximum difference of -1.05 Gy for the posterior shifts. For VMAT-10B, isocenter shifts in the posterior and right directions significantly decreased CTV coverage. The differences were -1.69 Gy, -1.48 Gy and -1.99 Gy, -1.69 Gy for ΔD95% and ΔD98%, respectively. Regarding the OARs, only isocenter shifts in the posterior, right, and inferior directions increased dose to the left lung and the heart. Differences in VMAT-10B were milder than those in VMAT-5B. Specifically, mean heart dose were increased by 0.42 Gy (range 0.10 ~ 0.95 Gy) and 0.20 Gy (range -0.11 ~ 0.72 Gy), and mean dose for the left lung were increased by 1.02 Gy (range 0.79 ~ 1.18 Gy) and 0.68 Gy (range 0.47 ~ 0.84 Gy) in VMAT-5B and VMAT-10B, respectively. High-dose volumes in the organs were increased by approximate 0 ~ 2 and 1 ~ 3 percentage points, respectively. Nevertheless, most of the dosimetric parameters in the perturbed plans were still clinically acceptable.

CONCLUSIONS

VMAT-5B appears to be more robust to 3 mm setup errors than VMAT-10B. VMAT-5B also resulted in better OARs sparing with acceptable target coverage and dose homogeneity. Therefore 5 mm bolus is recommended for PMRT of left-sided breast cancer using VMAT.

Post-mastectomy Radiation Therapy in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Patients: Analysis of the BEATRICE Trial

PURPOSE

Post-mastectomy radiation therapy (PMRT) improves locoregional control and overall survival in patients with breast cancer. With the evolution of systemic therapy, the benefit of PMRT in patients with triple-negative disease requires further evaluation.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

BEATRICE is a phase III randomized clinical trial that examined the efficacy of bevacizumab in patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). The current study is a retrospective analysis of data on patients enrolled and treated with mastectomy and systemic therapy. The primary endpoint was determining the effect of PMRT on locoregional recurrence rates (LRR). Hazard ratios were estimated using Cox regression, and LRR curves were generated by the Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

In total, 940 patients were included in our analysis, of whom 359 (38.2%) received PMRT while 581 (61.8%) did not. At median follow-up of 5 years, no significant difference in LRR was noted between the PMRT and no PMRT groups in node-negative patients (HR = 1.09). Patients with N1 disease had 5-year LRR-free survival of 96% for PMRT versus 91% for no PMRT (HR = 0.46). Most N2 patients received PMRT and had 5-year LRR-free survival of 76%.

CONCLUSION

PMRT benefit in TNBC patients treated with modern systemic therapy is lower than historical reports. Delivery of PMRT in patients with N1 disease enrolled in the BEATRICE trial was not shown to improve local control. As this might be due to patient selection for PMRT, future randomized controlled trials are required to assess the role of PMRT in this patient population.

Utility of post mastectomy radiotherapy among patients with T1/ T2 N1 disease: A retrospective cohort study

Background

Pakistan has the highest incidence of breast cancer among Asian Countries but there is insufficient representation of local data addressing breast cancer treatment and outcome. We sought to determine the role of post-mastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT) in T1- T2 breast cancer with 1–3 positive axillary lymph nodes.

Methods

Data was reviewed retrospectively of total 755 patients out of which 291 received PMRT and 464 did not from two large breast cancer centres.

Results

With a median follow up of 78 months, 4 (4.5%) patients developed loco regional recurrence (LRR) in the PMRT group while a substantial number 74 (24.4%) recurred in the non PMRT group (p = 0.000). Loco regional free survival rate (LRFS) and overall survival rate (OS) was significantly better for PMRT patients than non-PMRT patients (P = <0.000). Multivariate analysis identified young age, lymphovascular invasion, extra capsular extension, triple negative and ER/PR negative were independent prognostic factors affecting loco regional free survival (LRFS).

Conclusion

Disease recurrence is a substantial issue in 1–3 node group despite early stage, PMRT has an instrumental effect in improving LRFS and OS.

•

Disease recurrence is a significant concern in post mastectomy patients with T1-T2 N1 disease.

•

Post mastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT) has a substantial effect in reducing disease recurrence in this subset of patients.

•

PMRT improves disease free survival rate (DFS) and overall survival rate (OS).

Real-world impact of postmastectomy radiotherapy in T1-2 breast cancer with one to three positive lymph nodes

Background

The utility of postmastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT) in breast cancer patients with T1-2 (tumor size ≤5 cm) and N1 (one to three lymph nodes involved) disease remains controversial. The aim of this population-based study was to investigate the effectiveness of PMRT in this patient subset in the current clinical practice.

Methods

We included T1-2N1 breast cancer patients treated with mastectomy from 2004 to 2012 using the data form the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program. The association of PMRT administration with breast cancer-specific survival was determined using multivariable Cox analysis.

Results

We identified 10,248 patients of this study, including 3,725 (36.3%) received PMRT and 6,523 (63.7%) patients did not receive PMRT. Use of PMRT showed increase from 2008 onward; the percentage of patients receiving PMRT was 30.6% in 2004 and was 47.1% in 2012 (P<0.001). Patients diagnosis after 2008, aged <50 years, high tumor grade, T2 stage, and ≥2 positive lymph nodes were independently related to PMRT receipt. Multivariate analysis indicated that PMRT was not related to better breast cancer-specific survival compared to those without PMRT both before (P=0.186) and after propensity score matching (P=0.137).

Conclusions

In breast cancer with T1-2N1 disease, PMRT does not appear to improve survival in the era of modern systemic therapy.

Evaluation of the anti-Thomsen-Friedenreich antibodies Nemod-TF1 and Nemod-TF2 as prognostic markers in breast cancer

PURPOSE

The TF (Thomsen-Friedenreich, CD176, Galβ1-3GalNAc) carbohydrate moiety is known as a specific oncofetal carbohydrate epitope present in fetal and neoplastic tissue as well as in stem cells. TF was demonstrated to mediate tumor-promoting features and to be highly immunogenic. The current study aimed to evaluate whether presence of the TF antigen is associated with clinico-pathological parameters and prognosis of early breast cancer (BC).

METHODS

Primary BC tissue (n = 226) was stained for TF using two monoclonal anti-TF antibodies (Nemod-TF1, Nemod-TF2). Staining results were correlated to clinical data including survival.

RESULTS

Nemod-TF1 staining was positively correlated to lymph node metastasis (p = 0.03) and the presence of tumor-associated MUC1 (TA-MUC1; p = 0.003). Further, the presence of the Nemod-TF1 epitope predicted worse prognosis in TA-MUC1 positive (overall survival: p = 0.026) as well as in triple negative (overall survival: p = 0.002; distant metastasis-free survival: p = 0.012) BC.

CONCLUSIONS

The data presented here further support a role of TF in BC tumor biology. Whether anti-TF directed treatment approaches may gain clinical relevance in those cases determined as triple negative or TA-MUC1 positive remains to be determined.

T1-2N1M0 triple-negative breast cancer patients from the SEER database showed potential benefit from post-mastectomy radiotherapy

The effects of post-mastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT) on different subtypes of T1-2N1M0 breast cancer remain controversial. Patients with T1-2N1M0 breast cancer treated by mastectomy or mastectomy and PMRT were identified from the 2010–2013 dataset from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) registry. A total of 7,466 patients with the 7th American Joint Committee on Cancer stage (Tumor-Node-Metastasis stages 1–2, 1 and 0, respectively) including 2,760 cases (36.97%) treated by mastectomy and PMRT and 4,706 cases (63.03%) treated by mastectomy alone were analyzed in this study. The follow-up time for patients in the dataset used from the SEER registry was 0–59 months. The breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) of the patients was derived from the SEER dataset and stratified by treatment approach. A propensity score matching (PSM) analysis (experimental group: Control group ratio, 1:1) was conducted. Using univariate and multivariate analyses Cox proportional hazards analyses, PMRT was identified as an independent prognostic factor for triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). Before PSM analysis, the BCSS favored PMRT in the hormone receptor (HR)⁺/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)⁺ (P=0.025) and HR⁻/HER2⁻ groups (P=0.010) but not in the HR⁺/HER2⁻ (P=0.346) and HR⁻/HER2⁺ (P=0.288) groups. Following PSM analysis, BCSS favored PMRT alone in the TNBC (HR⁻/HER2⁻) group (P=0.025). Patients with T1-2N1M0 TNBC may benefit from radiotherapy post-mastectomy.

Functional analyses of microRNA-326 in breast cancer development

MicroRNA-326 (miR-326) was reported to be dysregulated and involved in the progression of multiple cancers. However, the clinical significance, biological role and underlying mechanism of miR-326 in the carcinogenesis of breast cancer are still unclear. In the present study, we showed that miR-326 was down-regulated in human breast cancer tissues and cell lines. Our results also revealed that miR-326 overexpression significantly suppressed breast cancer cell proliferation, migration and invasion, and induced cell cycle arrest at G1/G0 phase. Furthermore, Sex determining region Y-box (SOX) protein 12 (SOX12), a known oncogene, was identified as a direct target of miR-326 by luciferase reporter assay. Moreover, miR-326 expression was inversely correlated with SOX12 mRNA expression levels in human breast cancer specimens. Overexpression of SOX12 partially rescued the inhibitory effect on cell proliferation, migration and invasion in breast cancer cells caused by miR-326 overexpression. These findings suggested that miR-326 might play a suppressive role in breast cancer, at least in part, by targeting SOX12, rendering miR-326 a promising therapeutic target for breast cancer.

Heterogeneity in Outcomes of Pathologic T1-2N1 Breast Cancer After Mastectomy: Looking Beyond Locoregional Failure Rates

PURPOSE

A meta-analysis of 22 randomized trials accrued from 1964 to 1986 demonstrated significantly higher rates of locoregional failure (LRF) and breast-cancer mortality in women with 1-3 positive nodes without postmastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT) after mastectomy (mast.). Recent data demonstrate that PMRT reduces distant metastases (DM) in women with pN1 disease. The challenge today is whether all patients with pathologic T1-2pN1 disease have similar substantial LRF/DM risk that routinely warrants PMRT.

METHODS

We reviewed patients with pT1-2N1 breast cancer treated with mast. ± adjuvant systemic therapy without PMRT from 2000 to 2013. The endpoints were LRF and DM rates, estimated by cumulative incidence method.

RESULTS

We identified 468 patients with median follow-up of 6.3 years. Most (71%) were estrogen receptor/progesterone receptor + human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2). There were 269 patients with 1+ node, 140 patients with 2+ nodes, and 59 patients with 3+ nodes. The 6-year LRF/DM rates were 4.1%/8.4%. Patients with 1+, 2+, and 3+ nodes had 6-year LRF of 2.3, 5.1 and 8.9%, respectively (p = 0.13). The 6-year DM rate was higher in patients with 3+ nodes versus 1-2+ nodes: 15.7% versus 7.4% (p = 0.02). Several subgroups had low 6-year LRF and DM rates, including T1/1+ node (0.8%/4.1% LRF/DM) and micrometastases (0%/5.8% LRF/DM).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with pT1-2pN1 represent a heterogeneous group with a wide range of LRF/DM rates. In particular, patients with pT1 tumors and 1 + LN, and patients with micrometastases, had low event rates. These groups would derive small absolute reductions in LRF and DM with addition of PMRT, underscoring the importance of patient selection for PMRT in pT1-2pN1 breast cancer.

Multidisciplinary Management of the Axilla in Patients with cT1-T2 N0 Breast Cancer Undergoing Primary Mastectomy: Results from a Prospective Single-Institution Series

BACKGROUND

The after mapping of the axilla: radiotherapy or surgery (AMAROS) trial concluded that for patients with cT1-2 N0 breast cancer and one or two positive sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs), axillary radiotherapy (AxRT) provides equivalent locoregional control and a lower incidence of lymphedema compared with axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). The study prospectively assessed how often ALND could be replaced by AxRT in a consecutive cohort of patients undergoing mastectomy for cT1-2 N0 breast cancer.

METHODS

In November 2015, our multidisciplinary group agreed to omit routine intraoperative SLN evaluation for cT1-2 N0 patients undergoing upfront mastectomy and potentially eligible for postmastectomy radiation therapy (PMRT), including those 60 years of age or younger and those older than 60 years with high-risk features. Patients with one or two positive SLNs on final pathology were reviewed to determine whether PMRT including the full axilla was an appropriate alternative to ALND.

RESULTS

From November 2015 to December 2016, 154 patients met the study criteria, and 114 (74%) formed the final study cohort. Intraoperative SLN evaluation was omitted for 76 patients (67%). Of these patients, 20 (26%) had one or two positive SLNs, and 14 of these patients received PMRT + AxRT as an alternative to ALND. Three patients returned for ALND, and three patients were observed. On univariate analysis, tumor size, LVI, number of positive lymph nodes, and receipt of chemotherapy were associated with receipt of PMRT.

CONCLUSIONS

For the majority of patients with one or two positive SLNs, ALND was avoided in favor of PMRT + AxRT. With appropriate multidisciplinary strategies, intraoperative evaluation of the SLN and immediate ALND can be avoided for patients meeting the AMAROS criteria and eligible for PMRT.

Postmastectomy Radiation Therapy in Women with T1-T2 Tumors and 1 to 3 Positive Lymph Nodes: Analysis of the Breast International Group 02-98 Trial

PURPOSE

To analyze the impact of postmastectomy radiation therapy (PMRT) for patients with T1-T2 tumors and 1 to 3 positive lymph nodes enrolled on the Breast International Group (BIG) 02-98 trial.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

The BIG 02-98 trial randomized patients to receive adjuvant anthracycline with or without taxane chemotherapy. Delivery of PMRT was nonrandomized and performed according to institutional preferences. The present analysis was performed on participants with T1-T2 breast cancer and 1 to 3 positive lymph nodes who had undergone mastectomy and axillary nodal dissection. The primary objective of the present study was to examine the effect of PMRT on risk of locoregional recurrence (LRR), breast cancer-specific survival, and overall survival.

RESULTS

We identified 684 patients who met the inclusion criteria and were included in the analysis, of whom 337 (49%) had received PMRT. At 10 years, LRR risk was 2.5% in the PMRT group and 6.5% in the no-PMRT group (hazard ratio 0.29, 95% confidence interval 0.12-0.73; P = .005). Lower LRR after PMRT was noted for patients randomized to receive adjuvant chemotherapy with no taxane (10-year LRR: 3.4% vs 9.1%; P = .02). No significant differences in breast cancer-specific survival (84.3% vs 83.9%) or overall survival (81.7% vs 78.3%) were observed according to receipt of PMRT.

CONCLUSION

Our analysis of the BIG 02-98 trial shows excellent outcomes in women with T1-T2 tumors and 1 to 3 positive lymph nodes found in axillary dissection. Although PMRT improved LRR in this cohort, the number of events remained low at 10 years. In all groups, 10-year rates of LRR were relatively low compared with historical studies. As such, the use of PMRT in women with 1 to 3 positive nodes should be tailored to individual patient risks.

Predictive Value of Primary Tumor Site for Loco-regional Recurrence in Early Breast Cancer Patients with One to Three Positive Axillary Lymphadenophy

Introduction: It remains controversial on high risks for early breast cancer patients with one to three axillary nodes after mastectomy who is predisposition to locoregional recurrence. The present study is to investigate the relationship between primary tumor site and loco-regional recurrence (LRR) and explore the predictive value of clinicopathological characteristics in LRR for early breast cancer patients with one to three positive axillary lymph nodes after mastectomy. Methods: We reviewed the clinical data of 656 consecutively diagnosed patients with pT1-2N1M0 breast cancer who were treated in Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center with radical operation without postoperative radiotherapy between March 1998 and December 2010. The primary tumor sites included outer quadrant in 455 patients (69.36%), inner quadrant in 156 patients (23.78%)and central quadrant in 45 patients (6.86%). LRR and LRR-free survival (LRFS) in combination with clinical and pathological features were analyzed to screen out patients with higher risk of LRR. Results: The median follow-up time was 64.9 months. The 5-, 10-year LRR for the cohort was 8.6% and 12.9%, respectively; the 5-, 10-year LRFS was 86.2% and 76.4%, respectively. Multivariate analyses showed that age of ≤35 years, inner quadrant tumor and non-luminal subtype were independent risk factors for LRR and LRFS. Patients with primary tumor in inner quadrant showed higher LRR and poorer LRFS when risk factors are ≥2 than those with tumors in other sites. Conclusions: Inner quadrant tumor was an independent predictor for LRR and LRFS in patients with early breast cancer and one to three positive axillary lymph nodes, which would be more accurate in combination with other prognostic indexes including patients' age, pathological T stage, Ki67 status, molecular subtypes.

Postmastectomy radiation therapy for breast cancer patients with one to three positive lymph nodes: a propensity score matching analysis

AIM

Conducting postmastectomy radiation therapy (PMRT) for breast cancer patients with one to three positive lymph nodes is still controversial.

METHODS

Propensity score matching analysis was applied to balance the clinical baseline characteristics of patients. Cox proportional hazard analysis was used to analyze the survival prognosis factors and perform subgroup analysis.

RESULTS

There was no statistical difference in overall survival and cancer-specific survival rates (all, p > 0.05) between the PMRT and non-PMRT groups. However, for subgroup patients with tumor size ≥5 cm and the number of positive lymph nodes = 3, PMRT showed a significant survival benefit.

CONCLUSION

PMRT can improve overall survival and cancer-specific survival only in breast cancer patients whose tumor size is larger than 5 cm and with three positive lymph nodes.

Primary surgical treatment of locally advanced breast cancer in low resource settings

•Optimum management of locally advanced breast cancer is multidisciplinary.•Neoadjuvant chemotherapy is mainstay of management.•Primary surgical treatment may be acceptable in selected patients.

Comparative effectiveness study of breast-conserving surgery and mastectomy in the general population: A NCDB analysis

Purpose

Recent studies have revealed that breast-conserving surgery (BCS) with radiotherapy (RT) led to better survival than mastectomy in some populations. We compared the efficacy of BCS+RT and mastectomy using the National Cancer Database (NCDB, USA).

Methods

Non-metastatic breast cancers in the NCDB from 2004–2011 were identified. The Kaplan-Meier method, Coxregression and propensity score analysis were used to compare the overall survival (OS) among patients with BCS+RT, mastectomy alone and mastectomy+RT.

Results

A total of 160,880 patients with a median follow-up of 43.4 months were included. The respective 8-year OS values were 86.5%, 72.3% and 70.4% in the BCS+RT, mastectomy alone and mastectomy+RT group, respectively (P < 0.001). After exclusion of patients with comorbidities, mastectomy (alone or with RT) remained associated with a lower OS in N0 and N1 patients. However, the OS of mastectomy+RT was equivalent to BCS+RT in N2–3 patients. Among patients aged 50 or younger, the OS benefit of BCS+RT over mastectomy alone was statistically significant (HR1.42, 95% CI 1.16–1.74), but not clinically significant (<5%) in N0 patients, whereas in N2–3 patients, the OS of BCS+RT was equivalent to mastectomy+RT (85.2% vs. 84.8%). The results of the propensity analysis were similar.

Conclusions

BCS+RT resulted in improved OS compared with mastectomy ± RT in N0 and N1 patients. In N2–3 patients, BCS+RT has an OS similar to mastectomy+RT when patients with comorbidities were excluded. Among patients aged 50 or younger, the OS of BCS+RT is equivalent to mastectomy ± RT.

Improvement of survival with postmastectomy radiotherapy in patients with 1-3 positive axillary lymph nodes: A systematic review and meta-analysis of the current literature

In breast cancer with >4 positive axillary lymph nodes, it is common practice to deliver radiotherapy to the affected site following mastectomy. However, less is known regarding the benefits this may confer on women with 1-3 positive lymph nodes. In this meta-analysis, we aimed to assess whether post-mastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT) was beneficial for such patients. A literature review was conducted using the PubMed and Ovid databases. Selected studies were analysed and data regarding overall survival (OS) and locoregional recurrence (LRR) rates were extracted. Statistical analysis was then conducted in order to develop a combined risk ratio (RR) for both OS and LRR in the setting of PMRT in women with breast cancer with 1-3 positive lymph nodes. PMRT in women with 1-3 positive lymph nodes significantly reduced the risk of LRR, with a RR of 0.3 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.23-0.38] and also showed a minor benefit in terms of OS (RR=1.03, 95% CI: 1.00-1.07). Therefore, in breast cancer patients with 1-3 positive lymph nodes, PMRT significantly reduced the risk of LRR and was associated with a minor OS benefit. Until the results of ongoing randomised controlled trials are published, PMRT should be recommended in this group of patients following a careful multidisciplinary discussion.

National Evaluation of the New Commission on Cancer Quality Measure for Postmastectomy Radiation Treatment for Breast Cancer

BACKGROUND

Current guidelines recommend postmastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT) for patients with ≥4 positive lymph nodes and suggest strong consideration of PMRT in those with 1-3 positive nodes. These recommendations were incorporated into a Commission on Cancer quality measure in 2014. However, national adherence with these recommendations is unknown. Our objectives were to describe PMRT use in the United States in patients with stage I to III invasive breast cancer and to examine possible factors associated with the omission of PMRT.

METHODS

From the National Cancer Data Base, 753,536 mastectomies at 1123 hospitals were identified from 1998 to 2011. PMRT use over time was examined using random effects logistic regression analyses, adjusting for patient, tumor, and hospital characteristics. Analyses were stratified by nodal status (≥4 nodes positive, 1-3 nodes positive, node negative).

RESULTS

The proportion of patients receiving PMRT increased from 1998 to 2011 (>4 positive nodes: 56.2 to 66.6 %; 1-3 positive nodes: 28.0 to 39.1 %; node-negative: 8.3 to 10.0 %, p < 0.001 for all). In adjusted analyses, patients with ≥4 positive nodes were more likely to have PMRT omitted if they had smaller tumors. Patients with 1-3 positive nodes were more likely to have PMRT omitted if they had lower grade or smaller tumors. Irrespective of patients' nodal status, PMRT utilization rates decreased as age increased.

CONCLUSIONS

Though PMRT rates increased over time in patients with ≥4 and 1-3 positive nodes, PMRT in patients with ≥4 positive nodes remains underutilized. Feedback to hospitals using the new Commission on Cancer PMRT measure may help to improve adherence rates.

Prognostic analysis in a Chinese population with T1-2N1 breast cancer: Did patients with 1 or 2, and 3 positive axillary lymph nodes have similar survival outcomes?

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

There is a paucity of data examining whether 1-3 positive lymph nodes patients have similar survival outcomes. The present studies separately analyse survival outcomes of T1-2N1 breast cancer patients according to the number of positive lymph nodes.

METHODS

A total of 1,030 patients with T1-2N1 breast cancer were available for analysis. Survival estimates were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method, univariate, and multivariate logistic regression models

RESULTS

Kaplan-Meier analysis showed progressively worse survival with the increased number of positive lymph nodes. Log-rank test P values were 0.003 (1 vs. 2 positive LNs), <0.0001 (1 vs. 3), and 0.006 (2 vs. 3) for recurrence-free survival (RFS). Log-rank test P values were 0.045 (1 vs. 2), <0.0001 (1 vs. 3), and 0.018 (2 vs. 3) for metastasis-free survival (MFS). Log-rank test P values were 0.101 (1 vs. 2), <0.0001 (1 vs. 3), and 0.005 (2 vs. 3) for overall survival (OS). Multivariate analysis showed that 3 and 2 positive lymph nodes had worse survival compared with 1 positive axillary lymph nodes.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study does suggest that T1-2N1 patients showed progressively worse survival outcomes with the increased number of positive lymph nodes.