1
|
Peternel M, Jenko A, Peterlin P, Petrovič L, Strojan P, Plavc G. Comparison of conventional and hippocampus-sparing radiotherapy in nasopharyngeal carcinoma: In silico study and systematic review. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2024; 46:100751. [PMID: 38425692 PMCID: PMC10900111 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2024.100751] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2024] [Accepted: 02/17/2024] [Indexed: 03/02/2024] Open
Abstract
Background and purpose Radiation-induced damage to the hippocampi can cause cognitive decline. International recommendations for nasopharyngeal cancer (NPC) radiotherapy (RT) lack specific guidelines for protecting the hippocampi. Our study evaluates if hippocampi-sparing (HS) RT in NPC ensures target coverage and meets recommended dose limits for other at-risk organs. Materials and methods In a systematic literature review, we compared hippocampal D40% in conventional and HS RT plans. In an in silico dosimetric study, conventional and HS-VMAT plans were created for each patient, following international recommendations for OAR delineation, dose prioritization and acceptance criteria. We assessed the impact on neurocognitive function using a previously published normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) model. Results In four previous studies (n = 79), researchers reduced D40% hippocampal radiation doses in HS plans compared to conventional RT on average from 24.9 Gy to 12.6 Gy.Among 12 NPC patients included in this in silico study, statistically significant differences between HS and conventional VMAT plans were observed in hippocampal EQD2 Dmax (23.8 vs. 46.4 Gy), Dmin (3.8 vs. 4.6 Gy), Dmean (8.1 vs. 15.1 Gy), and D40% (8.3 vs. 15.8 Gy). PTV coverage and OAR doses were similar, with less homogeneous PTV coverage in HS plans (p = 0.038). This translated to a lower probability of memory decline in HS plans (interquartile range 15.8-29.6 %) compared to conventional plans (33.8-81.1 %) based on the NTCP model (p = 0.002). Conclusion Sparing the hippocampus in NPC RT is safe and feasible. Given the life expectancy of many NPC patients, their cognitive well-being must be paramount in radiotherapy planning.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Monika Peternel
- Institute of Oncology, Department of Radiotherapy, Zaloška cesta 2, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Aljaša Jenko
- Institute of Oncology, Department of Radiotherapy, Zaloška cesta 2, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Primož Peterlin
- Institute of Oncology, Department of Radiotherapy, Zaloška cesta 2, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Larisa Petrovič
- Institute of Oncology, Department of Radiotherapy, Zaloška cesta 2, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Primož Strojan
- Institute of Oncology, Department of Radiotherapy, Zaloška cesta 2, Ljubljana, Slovenia
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Vrazov trg 2, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Gaber Plavc
- Institute of Oncology, Department of Radiotherapy, Zaloška cesta 2, Ljubljana, Slovenia
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Vrazov trg 2, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Huang Y, Qin T, Yang M, Liu Z. Impact of ovary-sparing treatment planning on plan quality, treatment time and gamma passing rates in intensity-modulated radiotherapy for stage I/II cervical cancer. Medicine (Baltimore) 2023; 102:e36373. [PMID: 38115303 PMCID: PMC10727547 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000036373] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2023] [Revised: 11/07/2023] [Accepted: 11/08/2023] [Indexed: 12/21/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study aimed to investigate the impact of ovary-sparing intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) on plan quality, treatment time, and gamma passing rates for stage I/II cervical cancer patients. METHODS Fifteen stage I/II cervical cancer patients were retrospectively enrolled, and a pair of clinically suitable IMRT plans were designed for each patient, with (Group A) and without (Group B) ovary-sparing. Plan factors affecting plan quality, treatment time, and gamma passing rates, including the number of segments, monitor units, percentage of small-area segments (field area < 20 cm2), and percentage of small-MU segments (MU < 10), were compared and statistically analyzed. Key plan quality indicators, including ovarian dose, target dose coverage (D98%, D95%, D50%, D2%), conformity index, and homogeneity index, were evaluated and statistically assessed. Treatment time and gamma passing rates collected by IBA MatriXX were also compared. RESULTS The median ovarian dose in Group A and Group B was 7.61 Gy (range 6.71-8.51 Gy) and 38.52 Gy (range 29.84-43.82 Gy), respectively. Except for monitor units, all other plan factors were significantly lower in Group A than in Group B (all P < .05). Correlation coefficients between plan factors, treatment time, and gamma passing rates that were statistically different were all negative. Both Groups of plans met the prescription requirement (D95% ≥ 45.00 Gy) for clinical treatment. D98% was smaller for Group A than for Group B (P < .05); D50% and D2% were larger for Group A than for Group B (P < .05, P < .05). Group A plans had worse conformity index and homogeneity index than Group B plans (P < .05, P < .05). Treatment time did not differ significantly (P > .05). Gamma passing rates in Group A were higher than in Group B with the criteria of 2%/3 mm (P < .05) and 3%/2 mm (P < .05). CONCLUSION Despite the slightly decreased quality of the treatment plans, the ovary-sparing IMRT plans exhibited several advantages including lower ovarian dose and plan complexity, improved gamma passing rates, and a negligible impact on treatment time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yangyang Huang
- Department of Radiotherapy, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan Province, China
| | - Tingting Qin
- Department of Radiotherapy, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan Province, China
| | - Menglin Yang
- Department of Radiotherapy, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan Province, China
| | - Zongwen Liu
- Department of Radiotherapy, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan Province, China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Iyizoba-Ebozue Z, Prestwich R, Brown S, Hall E, Lilley J, Lowe M, Thomson DJ, Slevin F, Boele F, Murray L. Neurocognitive function following (chemo)radiotherapy for nasopharyngeal cancer and other head and neck cancers: A systematic review. Radiother Oncol 2023; 188:109863. [PMID: 37619657 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2023.109863] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2023] [Revised: 08/13/2023] [Accepted: 08/16/2023] [Indexed: 08/26/2023]
Abstract
When radiotherapy is used in the treatment of head and neck cancers, the brain commonly receives incidental doses of radiotherapy with potential for neurocognitive changes and subsequent impact on quality of life. This has not been widely investigated to date. A systematic search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, Psycinfo Info and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) electronic databases was conducted. Of 2077 records screened, 20 were eligible comprising 1308 patients. There were no randomised studies and 73.3% of included patients were from single center studies. IMRT was delivered in 72.6% of patients, and chemotherapy used in 61%. There was considerable heterogeneity in methods. Narrative synthesis was therefore carried out. Most studies demonstrated inferior neurocognitive outcomes when compared to control groups at 12 months and beyond radiotherapy. Commonly affected neurocognitive domains were memory and language which appeared related to radiation dose to hippocampus, temporal lobe, and cerebellum. Magnetic Resonance Imaging could be valuable in the detection of early microstructural and functional changes, which could be indicative of future neurocognitive changes. In studies investigating quality of life, the presence of neurocognitive impairment was associated with inferior quality of life outcomes. (Chemo)radiotherapy for head and neck cancer appears to be associated with a risk of long-term neurocognitive impairment. Few studies were identified, with substantial variation in methodology, thus limiting conclusions. High quality large prospective head and neck cancer studies using standardised, sensitive, and reliable neurocognitive tests are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Robin Prestwich
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Leeds Cancer Centre, Leeds, UK
| | - Sarah Brown
- Leeds Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research
| | - Emma Hall
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - John Lilley
- Department of Radiotherapy Physics, Leeds Cancer Centre, Leeds, UK
| | - Matthew Lowe
- Department of Medical Physics and Engineering, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - David J Thomson
- Department of Clinical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK; Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Finbar Slevin
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Leeds Cancer Centre, Leeds, UK; Leeds Institute of Medical Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Florien Boele
- Leeds Institute of Medical Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Louise Murray
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Leeds Cancer Centre, Leeds, UK; Leeds Institute of Medical Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Winter SF, Vaios EJ, Shih HA, Grassberger C, Parsons MW, Gardner MM, Ehret F, Kaul D, Boehmerle W, Endres M, Dietrich J. Mitigating Radiotoxicity in the Central Nervous System: Role of Proton Therapy. Curr Treat Options Oncol 2023; 24:1524-1549. [PMID: 37728819 DOI: 10.1007/s11864-023-01131-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/08/2023] [Indexed: 09/21/2023]
Abstract
OPINION STATEMENT Central nervous system (CNS) radiotoxicity remains a challenge in neuro-oncology. Dose distribution advantages of protons over photons have prompted increased use of brain-directed proton therapy. While well-recognized among pediatric populations, the benefit of proton therapy among adults with CNS malignancies remains controversial. We herein discuss the role of protons in mitigating late CNS radiotoxicities in adult patients. Despite limited clinical trials, evidence suggests toxicity profile advantages of protons over conventional radiotherapy, including retention of neurocognitive function and brain volume. Modelling studies predict superior dose conformality of protons versus state-of-the-art photon techniques reduces late radiogenic vasculopathies, endocrinopathies, and malignancies. Conversely, potentially higher brain tissue necrosis rates following proton therapy highlight a need to resolve uncertainties surrounding the impact of variable biological effectiveness of protons on dose distribution. Clinical trials comparing best photon and particle-based therapy are underway to establish whether protons substantially improve long-term treatment-related outcomes in adults with CNS malignancies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sebastian F Winter
- Department of Neurology and MGH Cancer Center, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
- Department of Neurology and Experimental Neurology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, 10117, Berlin, Germany.
- Berlin Institute of Health at Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, BIH Biomedical Innovation Academy, BIH Charité Junior Clinician Scientist Program, 10117, Berlin, Germany.
| | - Eugene J Vaios
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Helen A Shih
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Clemens Grassberger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Michael W Parsons
- Department of Psychiatry, Psychology Assessment Center, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Melissa M Gardner
- Department of Psychiatry, Psychology Assessment Center, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Felix Ehret
- Berlin Institute of Health at Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, BIH Biomedical Innovation Academy, BIH Charité Junior Clinician Scientist Program, 10117, Berlin, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, 13353, Berlin, Germany
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Berlin, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - David Kaul
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, 13353, Berlin, Germany
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Berlin, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Wolfgang Boehmerle
- Department of Neurology and Experimental Neurology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, 10117, Berlin, Germany
| | - Matthias Endres
- Department of Neurology and Experimental Neurology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, 10117, Berlin, Germany
- Center for Stroke Research Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- ExcellenceCluster NeuroCure, Berlin, Germany
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), partner site Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- German Centre for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), partner site Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Jorg Dietrich
- Department of Neurology and MGH Cancer Center, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Auerbach H, Dzierma Y, Schürmann M, Rübe C, Rübe CE. Measuring out-of-field dose to the hippocampus in common radiotherapy indications. Radiat Oncol 2023; 18:64. [PMID: 37029409 PMCID: PMC10080875 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-023-02242-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2022] [Accepted: 03/06/2023] [Indexed: 04/09/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The high susceptibility of the hippocampus region to radiation injury is likely the causal factor of neurocognitive dysfunctions after exposure to ionizing radiation. Repetitive exposures with even low doses have been shown to impact adult neurogenesis and induce neuroinflammation. We address the question whether the out-of-field doses during radiotherapy of common tumour entities may pose a risk for the neuronal stem cell compartment in the hippocampus. METHODS The dose to the hippocampus was determined for a single fraction according to different treatment plans for the selected tumor entities: Point dose measurements were performed in an anthropomorphic Alderson phantom and the out-of-field dose to the hippocampus was measured using thermoluminescence dosimeters. RESULTS For carcinomas in the head and neck region the dose exposure to the hippocampal region for a single fraction ranged from to 37.4 to 154.8 mGy. The hippocampal dose was clearly different for naso-, oro- and hypopharynx, with maximal values for nasopharynx carcinoma. In contrast, hippocampal dose levels for breast and prostate cancer ranged between 2.7 and 4.1 mGy, and therefore significantly exceeded the background irradiation level. CONCLUSION The mean dose to hippocampus for treatment of carcinomas in the head and neck region is high enough to reduce neurocognitive functions. In addition, care must be taken regarding the out of field doses. The mean dose is mainly related to scattering effects, as is confirmed by the data from breast or prostate treatments, with a very different geometrical set-up but similar dosimetric results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hendrik Auerbach
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Saarland University Medical Center, Homburg, Saar, Germany.
| | - Yvonne Dzierma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Saarland University Medical Center, Homburg, Saar, Germany
| | - Michaela Schürmann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Saarland University Medical Center, Homburg, Saar, Germany
| | - Christian Rübe
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Saarland University Medical Center, Homburg, Saar, Germany
| | - Claudia E Rübe
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Saarland University Medical Center, Homburg, Saar, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Normal tissue objective (NTO) tool in Eclipse treatment planning system for dose distribution optimization. POLISH JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS AND ENGINEERING 2022. [DOI: 10.2478/pjmpe-2022-0012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Introduction: The purpose of this study was to determine the best normal tissue objective (NTO) values based on the dose distribution from brain tumor radiation therapy.
Material and methods: The NTO is a constraint provided by Eclipse to limit the dose to normal tissues by steepening the dose gradient. The multitude of NTO setting combinations necessitates optimal NTO settings. The Eclipse supports manual and automatic NTOs. Fifteen patients were re-planned using NTO priorities of 1, 50, 100, 150, 200, and 500 in combination with dose fall-offs of 0.05, 0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.5, 1 and 5 mm-1. NTO distance to planning target volume (PTV), start dose, and end dose were 1 mm, 105%, and 60%, respectively, for all plans. In addition, planning without the NTO was arranged to find out its effect on planning. The prescription dose covered 95% of the PTV. Planning was evaluated using several indices: conformity index (CI), homogeneity index (HI), gradient index (GI), modified gradient index (mGI), comprehensive quality index (CQI), and monitor unit (MU). Differences among automatic NTO, manual NTO, and without NTO were evaluated using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test.
Results: Comparisons obtained without and with manual NTO were: CI of 0.77 vs. 0.96 (p = 0.002), GI of 4.52 vs. 4.69 (p = 0.233), mGI of 4.93 vs. 3.95 (p = 0.001), HI of 1.10 vs. 1.10 (p = 0.330), and MU/cGy of 3.44 vs. 3.42 (p = 0.460). Planning without NTO produced a poor conformity index. Comparisons of automatic and manual NTOs were: CI of 0.92 vs. 0.96 (p = 0.035), GI of 5.25 vs. 4.69 (p = 0.253), mGI of 4.46 vs. 3.95 (p = 0.001), HI of 1.09 vs. 1.10 (p = 0.004), MU/cGy of 3.31 vs. 3.42 (p = 0.041).
Conclusions: Based on these results, manual NTO with a priority of 100 and dose fall-off 0.5 mm-1 was optimal, as indicated by the high dose reduction in normal tissue.
Collapse
|
7
|
Wang G, Wang H, Zhuang H, Yang R. An Investigation of Non-Coplanar Volumetric Modulated Radiation Therapy for Locally Advanced Unresectable Pancreatic Cancer Using a Trajectory Optimization Method. Front Oncol 2021; 11:717634. [PMID: 34604054 PMCID: PMC8485751 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.717634] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2021] [Accepted: 08/26/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE This study was conducted in order to develop a trajectory optimization algorithm for non-coplanar volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) and investigate the potential of organs at risk (OARs) sparing in locally advanced pancreatic cancer patients using non-coplanar VMAT. METHODS AND MATERIALS Firstly, a cost map that represents the ray-OAR voxel intersections at each source position was generated using a ray-tracing algorithm. A graph search algorithm was then used to determine the least-cost path from the cost map. Lastly, full arcs or partial arcs were selected based on the least-cost path to generate the non-coplanar VMAT (ncVMAT) trajectories. Clinical coplanar VMAT (coVMAT) plans for 11 patients diagnosed with locally advanced unresectable pancreatic cancer (LAPC) receiving 45 to 70 Gy in 25 fractions were replanned using non-coplanar VMAT trajectories. Both coplanar and non-coplanar plans were normalized to cover 95% of the PTV45 Gy volume with a prescription dose of 45 Gy. The conformity index (CI), homogeneity index (HI), PTV coverage, and dose to the OARs were compared between coVMAT and ncVMAT plans. RESULTS With ncVMAT, the mean coverage of PTV50 Gy, PTV54 Gy, PTV60 Gy, and PTV70 Gy increased significantly. The mean conformity index of PTV45 Gy, PTV54 Gy, and PTV70 Gy was also improved in the ncVMAT plans. Compared with coVMAT plans, the ncVMAT plans resulted in significantly lower doses to the spinal cord, bilateral kidneys, stomach, and duodenum. The maximum dose to the spinal cord decreased by 6.11%. The mean dose to the left and right kidneys decreased by an average of 5.52% and 11.71%, respectively. The D max, D mean, and D 15% of the stomach were reduced by an average of 7.45%, 15.82%, and 16.79%, separately. The D 15% and D mean of the duodenum decreased 6.38% and 5.64%, respectively. CONCLUSION A trajectory optimization algorithm was developed for non-coplanar VMAT. Compared with conventional coplanar VMAT, non-coplanar VMAT resulted in improved coverage and conformity to the targets. The sparing of OARs was significantly improved in non-coplanar VMAT compared with coVMAT plans for locally advanced pancreatic cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Ruijie Yang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Nangia S, Singh M, Khosa R, Rout SK, Singh G, Oomen S. The Hippocampus: A New Organ at Risk for Postoperative Radiation Therapy for Bucco-alveolar Cancer? A Dosimetric and Biological Analysis. Adv Radiat Oncol 2021; 6:100681. [PMID: 34195495 PMCID: PMC8233467 DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2021.100681] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2020] [Revised: 02/15/2021] [Accepted: 02/24/2021] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE A significant proportion of patients with bucco-alveolar cancer are long-term survivors, warranting attention to survivorship issues. Decline in neurocognitive function after cranial irradiation for brain tumors correlates with a hippocampal maximum dose (Dmax) of more than 16 Gy, minimum dose (Dmin) of more than 9 Gy, and dose to 40% of the hippocampal volume (D40%) exceeding 7.3 Gy in 2-Gy equivalent dose (EQD2), respectively. We analyzed the utility of sparing the hippocampus in postoperative radiation therapy (PORT) for patients with bucco-alveolar cancer, given the proximity of target volumes to the hippocampus, by virtue of inclusion of the infratemporal fossa. METHODS AND MATERIALS We instituted hippocampal sparing for patients with bucco-alveolar cancer receiving PORT in March 2018. Ten prior and 10 subsequent consecutive patients with pathologically staged I-IVA cancers of the buccal mucosa, alveolus, and retromolar trigone formed the control group (no hippocampal sparing) and the study group (hippocampal sparing), respectively. The brain and temporal lobes were prescribed dose constraints in both groups. Patients received doses of 60 to 66 Gy at 2 Gy per fraction using the image-guided intensity modulated radiation therapy / volumetric modulated arc therapy technique. Treatment plans were evaluated for (1) hippocampal dosimetric parameters, (2) planning target volume dosimetry and plan-quality indices, and (3) biological indices of equivalent uniform dose (EUD) and normal-tissue complication probability (NTCP) for impaired neurocognitive function. RESULTS Hippocampal sparing significantly reduced the hippocampal DmaxEQD2, DmeanEQD2, and D40%EQD2 from 27 Gy to 10.9 Gy (P = .002), 14.3 Gy to 6.4 Gy (P = .002), and 15.5 Gy to 6.6 Gy (P = .005), respectively, with comparable plan-quality indices. The radiobiologically robust endpoints of ipsilateral hippocampal EUD (P = .005) and NTCP (P = .01) were statistically significantly improved. CONCLUSIONS Meaningful dosimetric benefit, corroborated with radiobiological indices, was observed with hippocampal sparing. The feasibility and benefit of hippocampal sparing supports our view that the hippocampus should be incorporated as an organ at risk and attention should be given to neurocognitive function in patients with bucco-alveolar cancer who are receiving PORT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sapna Nangia
- Radiotherapy, Radiation Oncology, Apollo Proton Cancer Centre, Chennai, India
| | - Maneesh Singh
- Radiotherapy, Department of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, India
| | - Robin Khosa
- Radiotherapy, Radiation Oncology, Indraprastha Apollo Hospital, New Delhi, India
| | | | - Grishma Singh
- Radiotherapy, Radiation Oncology, Indraprastha Apollo Hospital, New Delhi, India
| | - Saji Oomen
- Medical Physics, Indraprastha Apollo Hospital, New Delhi, India
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Smyth G, Evans PM, Bamber JC, Bedford JL. Recent developments in non-coplanar radiotherapy. Br J Radiol 2019; 92:20180908. [PMID: 30694086 PMCID: PMC6580906 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20180908] [Citation(s) in RCA: 51] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/22/2018] [Revised: 01/15/2019] [Accepted: 01/17/2019] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
This paper gives an overview of recent developments in non-coplanar intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT). Modern linear accelerators are capable of automating motion around multiple axes, allowing efficient delivery of highly non-coplanar radiotherapy techniques. Novel techniques developed for C-arm and non-standard linac geometries, methods of optimization, and clinical applications are reviewed. The additional degrees of freedom are shown to increase the therapeutic ratio, either through dose escalation to the target or dose reduction to functionally important organs at risk, by multiple research groups. Although significant work is still needed to translate these new non-coplanar radiotherapy techniques into the clinic, clinical implementation should be prioritized. Recent developments in non-coplanar radiotherapy demonstrate that it continues to have a place in modern cancer treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gregory Smyth
- Joint Department of Physics, The Institute of Cancer Research and The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | | | - Jeffrey C Bamber
- Joint Department of Physics, The Institute of Cancer Research and The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - James L Bedford
- Joint Department of Physics, The Institute of Cancer Research and The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
McDowell LJ, Ringash J, Xu W, Chan B, Lu L, Waldron J, Rock K, So N, Huang SH, Giuliani M, Hope A, O'Sullivan B, Bratman SV, Cho J, Kim J, Jang R, Bayley A, Bernstein LJ. A cross sectional study in cognitive and neurobehavioral impairment in long-term nasopharyngeal cancer survivors treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy. Radiother Oncol 2018; 131:179-185. [PMID: 30279047 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2018.09.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/07/2018] [Revised: 07/25/2018] [Accepted: 09/16/2018] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE/OBJECTIVES To determine neurocognitive and neurobehavioral impairment in long-term nasopharyngeal cancer survivors (NPC) treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT). MATERIALS/METHODS A cross-sectional cohort of NPC ≥4 years (y) following IMRT was assessed. Objective cognitive function was measured using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) and patient-reported memory was assessed with the MDASI-HN problems remembering item. Patient and family ratings of patients' neurobehavioral symptoms of apathy, disinhibition and executive dysfunction were assessed with the Frontal Systems Behavior Scale (FrSBe). Other patient-reported symptoms (MDASI-HN), mood (HADS), and quality of life (FACT-H&N) were also collected. RESULTS Among 102 participants: M:F = 66:36; median age 56y (32-77); median time since IMRT 7.5y (4.2-11.1). Impaired MoCA scores (<23) were observed in 33 (32%). Patient and family ratings of pre-illness neurobehavioral symptoms were in the normal range (total FrSBe T-scores 53.3 and 59.0 respectively). In contrast, post-treatment patient and family T-scores were clinically impaired (64.7, 71.3 respectively), with apathy, disinhibition and executive dysfunction post-treatment ratings all significantly worse than pre-treatment (p < 0.001). Prevalence of clinically significant post-treatment disturbance was high by patient and family ratings (48%/66% apathy, 35%/53% disinhibition, 39%/56% executive dysfunction). Post-treatment neurobehavioral symptoms strongly correlated with lower quality of life (r = -0.62) and higher anxiety (r = 0.62) and depression scores (r = 0.67, all p < 0.001). Total MoCA scores did not correlate with RT dose. However, greater declines in apathy, disinhibition and executive dysfunction were associated with receiving >75 Gy to temporal lobes. CONCLUSION NPC treated with IMRT had moderate to high rates of neurocognitive impairment and clinically significant apathy, disinhibition, and executive dysfunction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lachlan J McDowell
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Jolie Ringash
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Canada
| | - Wei Xu
- Department of Biostatistics, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Canada
| | - Biu Chan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Canada
| | - Lin Lu
- Department of Biostatistics, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Canada
| | - John Waldron
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Canada
| | - Kathy Rock
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Canada
| | - Nathaniel So
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Canada
| | - Shao Hui Huang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Canada
| | - Meredith Giuliani
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Canada
| | - Andrew Hope
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Canada
| | - Brian O'Sullivan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Canada
| | - Scott V Bratman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Canada
| | - John Cho
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Canada
| | - John Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Canada
| | - Raymond Jang
- Division of Medical Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Canada
| | - Andrew Bayley
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Canada
| | - Lori J Bernstein
- Department of Supportive Care, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Murzin VL, Woods K, Moiseenko V, Karunamuni R, Tringale KR, Seibert TM, Connor MJ, Simpson DR, Sheng K, Hattangadi-Gluth JA. 4π plan optimization for cortical-sparing brain radiotherapy. Radiother Oncol 2018; 127:128-135. [PMID: 29519628 PMCID: PMC6084493 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2018.02.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2017] [Revised: 02/07/2018] [Accepted: 02/11/2018] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Incidental irradiation of normal brain tissue during radiotherapy is linked to cognitive decline, and may be mediated by damage to healthy cortex. Non-coplanar techniques may be used for cortical sparing. We compared normal brain sparing and probability of cortical atrophy using 4π radiation therapy planning vs. standard fixed gantry intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT). MATERIAL AND METHODS Plans from previously irradiated brain tumor patients ("original IMRT", n = 13) were re-planned to spare cortex using both 4π optimization ("4π") and IMRT optimization ("optimized IMRT"). Homogeneity index (HI), gradient measure, doses to cortex and white matter (excluding tumor), brainstem, optics, and hippocampus were compared with matching PTV coverage. Probability of three grades of post-treatment cortical atrophy was modeled based on previously established dose response curves. RESULTS With matching PTV coverage, 4π significantly improved HI by 27% (p = 0.005) and gradient measure by 8% (p = 0.001) compared with optimized IMRT. 4π optimization reduced mean and equivalent uniform doses (EUD) to all standard OARs, with 14-15% reduction in hippocampal EUD (p ≤ 0.003) compared with the other two plans. 4π significantly reduced dose to fractional cortical volumes (V50, V40 and V30) compared with the original IMRT plans, and reduced cortical V30 by 7% (p = 0.008) compared with optimized IMRT. White matter EUD, mean dose, and fractional volumes V50, V40 and V30 were also significantly lower with 4π (p ≤ 0.001). With 4π, probability of grade 1, 2 and 3 cortical atrophy decreased by 12%, 21% and 26% compared with original IMRT and by 8%, 14% and 3% compared with optimized IMRT, respectively (p ≤ 0.001). CONCLUSIONS 4π radiotherapy significantly improved cortical sparing and reduced doses to standard brain OARs, white matter, and the hippocampus. This was achieved with superior PTV dose homogeneity. Such sparing could reduce the probability of cortical atrophy that may lead to cognitive decline.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vyacheslav L Murzin
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, United States
| | - Kaley Woods
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, United States
| | - Vitali Moiseenko
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, United States
| | - Roshan Karunamuni
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, United States
| | - Kathryn R Tringale
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, United States
| | - Tyler M Seibert
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, United States
| | - Michael J Connor
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, United States
| | - Daniel R Simpson
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, United States
| | - Ke Sheng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, United States
| | - Jona A Hattangadi-Gluth
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Zer A, Pond GR, Razak ARA, Tirona K, Gan HK, Chen EX, O'Sullivan B, Waldron J, Goldstein DP, Weinreb I, Hope AJ, Kim JJ, Chan KKW, Chan AK, Siu LL, Bernstein LJ. Association of Neurocognitive Deficits With Radiotherapy or Chemoradiotherapy for Patients With Head and Neck Cancer. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2017; 144:71-79. [PMID: 29167901 DOI: 10.1001/jamaoto.2017.2235] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
Importance Neurocognitive deficits (NCD) have been observed in noncentral nervous system cancers, yet short- and long-term neurocognitive data on patients treated for head and neck cancer (HNC) are lacking. Objective To assess objective neurocognitive function before and after definitive radiation therapy for HNC. Design, Setting, and Participants In a prospective, longitudinal study, neurocognitive function and self-reported symptoms were assessed in 80 patients with histologically proven HNC requiring definitive chemoradiotherapy or radiotherapy and in 40 healthy controls 4 times (baseline, 6, 12, and 24 months after baseline) prior to commencing treatment at Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada. Main Outcomes and Measures Neurocognitive test scores were converted to age-corrected z scores (mean, 0; standard deviation, 1) and reported as mean scores, standardized regression-based scores, and frequencies of impairments in intellectual capacity, concentration, memory, executive function, processing speed, and motor dexterity. Multivariable analysis was used to identify factors associated with NCD 2 years after treatment. Results Eighty patients and 40 healthy controls enrolled. Analyses revealed significant differences between patient and control mean performance in some domains, with patient deficits increasing over time: intellectual capacity (Cohen d, effect sizes [95% CIs] of -0.46 [-0.64 to 0.30], -0.51 [-0.72 to -0.30], and -0.70 [-0.92 to -0.49] for time points 6, 12, and 24 months, respectively); concentration/short-term attention span (-0.19 [-0.37 to 0.00], -0.38 [-0.55 to -0.21], -0.54 [-0.71 to -0.37]); verbal memory (-0.16 [-0.33 to 0.02], -0.38 [-0.64 to -0.12], -0.53 [-0.74 to -0.32]); executive function (-0.14 [-0.27 to 0.00], -0.34 [-0.52 to -0.16], -0.43 [-0.64 to -0.22]), and global cognitive function composite (-0.38 [-0.55 to -0.22], -0.75 [-0.92 to -0.58], -1.06 [-1.26 to -0.86]). There was an increased rate of impaired global neurocognitive functioning among patients (38%) at 24 months compared with controls (0%). Neurocognitive deficits were not associated with baseline cytokines. Conclusions and Relevance Head and neck cancer survivors have neurocognitive sequelae up to 2 years after definitive chemoradiotherapy or radiation treatment. Patients and health care teams should know about such potential risks. Further research is warranted in search of strategies to avoid, reduce, and compensate for declines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alona Zer
- Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Canada
| | - Gregory R Pond
- Department of Biostatistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
| | - Albiruni R Abdul Razak
- Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Canada
| | - Kattleya Tirona
- Department of Supportive Care, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Canada
| | - Hui K Gan
- Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Canada
| | - Eric X Chen
- Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Canada
| | - Brian O'Sullivan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Canada
| | - John Waldron
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Canada
| | - David P Goldstein
- Department of Otolaryngology- Head & Neck Surgery, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Canada
| | - Ilan Weinreb
- Department of Pathology, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Canada
| | - Andrew J Hope
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Canada
| | - John J Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Canada
| | - Kelvin K W Chan
- Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Canada
| | - Andrew K Chan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Canada
| | - Lillian L Siu
- Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Canada
| | - Lori J Bernstein
- Department of Supportive Care, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Gu W, Li Q, Xi D, Tian Y, Mo J, Pei H. The Hippocampus Sparing Volume Modulated Arc Therapy does not Influence Plan Quality on Locally Advanced Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Patients. Sci Rep 2017; 7:3443. [PMID: 28611367 PMCID: PMC5469746 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-03517-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2016] [Accepted: 05/02/2017] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
Irradiation on hippocampus would lead to neuro-cognitive dysfunction in locally advanced nasopharyneal carcinoma (LA-NPC) patients accepting radiotherapy. Our study here aimed to investigate if undergoing hippocampus sparing (HS) volume modulated arc therapy (VMAT) would influence the plan quality in LA NPC patients. We designed three kinds of radiotherapeutic plans for 11 LA NPC patients: conventional VMAT (C-VMAT), HS-VMAT and HS intensity modulated radiation therapy with dynamic multileaf collimator (HS-dMLC). And the dose distribution on targets and surrounding organs at risk (OAR) were carefully evaluated. We found out that the expected doses on hippocampus were significantly lowered in HS-VMAT (899 ± 378 cGy) and HS-dMLC (896 ± 321 cGy) as compared to C-VMAT (1518 ± 337 cGy, p < 0.05), but meaningless difference was presented on plan quality of targets (p > 0.05). Moreover, lower radiation doses on brain stem were observed in HS-VMAT plan in comparison with C-VMAT plan (p < 0.05). However, there were no statistically meaningful diversities in the doses received by other OARs among all plans. Here we concluded that HS-VMAT presented promising advantages on protecting hipppcampus and brain stem as compared to C-VMAT and HS-dMLC, but enthusiastically had no effects on plan quality in LA-NPC patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wendong Gu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, The First Peoples' Hospital of Changzhou, Changzhou, 213003, China
| | - Qilin Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, The First Peoples' Hospital of Changzhou, Changzhou, 213003, China
| | - Dan Xi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, The First Peoples' Hospital of Changzhou, Changzhou, 213003, China
| | - Ye Tian
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, 215004, China
| | - Juncong Mo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, The First Peoples' Hospital of Changzhou, Changzhou, 213003, China
| | - Honglei Pei
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, The First Peoples' Hospital of Changzhou, Changzhou, 213003, China.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Radiation-induced biological changes of neural structures in the base of the skull tumours. JOURNAL OF RADIOTHERAPY IN PRACTICE 2017. [DOI: 10.1017/s1460396916000601] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
AbstractBackground and purposeThe aim of this paper is to compare neural induced changes in three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) versus intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) for nasopharyngeal cancers.Materials and methodsRadiotherapy plans for 10 patients with nasopharyngeal cancer stages III and IV were prospectively developed for 3D-CRT, IMRT and VMAT using Varian Eclipse planning system. The same radiation therapist carried out all planning and the same clinical dosimetric constraints were used. Normal tissue complication probabilities were calculated.ResultsThe mean planning target volume’s (PTVs) conformity index (CI) for 3D-CRT was 1·424, for IMRT 1·1, and for VMAT 1·081. The PTV homogeneity (HI) index was 0·204 for 3D-CRT, 0·124 for IMRT and 0·153 for VMAT. Normal tissue complication probabilities gave complex results for 3D-CRT, IMRT and VMAT and are analysed in detail in this paper. The mean monitor units were 95 (range 9–180) for 3D-CRT; 165 (range 52–277) for IMRT; and 331 (range 167–494) for VMAT (p<0·05).ConclusionsVMAT is associated with similar dosimetric advantages as IMRT over 3D-CRT for nasopharyngeal cancer. VMAT is associated with faster delivery times and greater number of mean monitor units than IMRT. Brain radionecrosis severity and risk, in the past, have been underestimated. By improving the life expectancy of patients with nasopharyngeal cancer to ensure maintenance of the neural structures, recommended dose limits should be considered as a first degree priority (as the spinal cord, brainstem, etc.) when IMRT and VMAT plans are implemented.
Collapse
|
15
|
Williams JP, Calvi L, Chakkalakal JV, Finkelstein JN, O’Banion MK, Puzas E. Addressing the Symptoms or Fixing the Problem? Developing Countermeasures against Normal Tissue Radiation Injury. Radiat Res 2016; 186:1-16. [PMID: 27332954 PMCID: PMC4991354 DOI: 10.1667/rr14473.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Jacqueline P. Williams
- Department of Environmental Medicine, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York
| | - Laura Calvi
- Department of Medicine, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York
| | - Joe V. Chakkalakal
- Center for Musculoskeletal Research, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York
| | - Jacob N. Finkelstein
- Department of Environmental Medicine, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York
- Department of Pediatrics and Neonatology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York
| | - M. Kerry O’Banion
- Department of Neuroscience, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York
| | - Edward Puzas
- Center for Musculoskeletal Research, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Kunogi H, Yamaguchi N, Terao Y, Sasai K. Kidney-Sparing Methods for Extended-Field Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy (EF-IMRT) in Cervical Carcinoma Treatment. PLoS One 2016; 11:e0156623. [PMID: 27258030 PMCID: PMC4892687 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0156623] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2015] [Accepted: 05/17/2016] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Coplanar extended-field intensity-modulated radiation therapy (EF-IMRT) targeting the whole-pelvic and para-aortic lymph nodes in patients with advanced cervical cancer results in impaired creatinine clearance. An improvement in renal function cannot be expected unless low-dose (approximately 10 Gy) kidney exposure is reduced. The dosimetric method should be considered during EF-IMRT planning to further reduce low-dose exposure to the kidneys. To assess the usefulness of non-coplanar EF-IMRT with kidney-avoiding beams to spare the kidneys during cervical carcinoma treatment in dosimetric analysis between non-coplanar and coplanar EF-IMRT, we compared the doses of the target organ and organs at risk, including the kidney, in 10 consecutive patients. To estimate the influence of EFRT on renal dysfunction, creatinine clearance values after treatment were also examined in 18 consecutive patients. Of these 18 patients, 10 patients who were included in the dosimetric analysis underwent extended field radiation therapy (EFRT) with concurrent chemotherapy, and eight patients underwent whole-pelvis radiation therapy with concurrent chemotherapy to treat cervical carcinoma between April 2012 and March 2015 at our institution. In the dosimetric analysis, non-coplanar EF-IMRT was effective at reducing low-dose (approximately 10 Gy) exposure to the kidneys, thus maintaining target coverage and sparing other organs at risk, such as the small bowel, rectum, and bladder, compared with coplanar EF-IMRT. Renal function in all 10 patients who underwent EFRT, including coplanar EF-IMRT (with kidney irradiation), was low after treatment, and differed significantly from that of the eight patients who underwent WPRT (no kidney irradiation) 6 months after the first day of treatment (P = 0.005). In conclusion, non-coplanar EF-IMRT should be considered in patients with advanced cervical cancer, particularly in patients with a long life expectancy or with pre-existing renal dysfunction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hiroaki Kunogi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Juntendo University, 2-1-1, Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113–8421, Japan
- * E-mail:
| | - Nanae Yamaguchi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Juntendo University, 2-1-1, Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113–8421, Japan
| | - Yasuhisa Terao
- Department of Gynecology, Juntendo University, 2-1-1, Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113–8421, Japan
| | - Keisuke Sasai
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Juntendo University, 2-1-1, Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113–8421, Japan
| |
Collapse
|