Determination of benefits of cochlear implantation in children with auditory neuropathy

Outcomes of cochlear implantation in 75 patients with auditory neuropathy

Background

Cochlear implantation (CI) outcomes in patients with auditory neuropathy (AN) are variable, which hampers patients' decisions on CI.

Objective

This study aims to assess the outcomes of CI in individuals diagnosed with AN and to examine the various factors that may influence the effectiveness of this intervention.

Methods

A total of 75 patients diagnosed with AN were included in the study. The hearing threshold, the score of categories of auditory performance (CAP), speech intelligibility rating (SIR), and speech audiometry were tested. Genetic testing was conducted by medical exome sequencing in 46 patients.

Results

After CI, the average aided hearing threshold for patients with prelingual and post-lingual onset was 38.25 ± 6.63 dB and 32.58 ± 9.26 dB, respectively; CAP score improved to 5.52 ± 1.64 (p < 0.001) and 6.00 ± 0.96 (p < 0.001), respectively; SIR score increased to 3.57 ± 1.22 (p < 0.001) and 4.15 ± 0.95 (p < 0.001), respectively. Maximum speech recognition ranged from 58 to 93% for prelingual onset patients and 43 to 98% for those with post-lingual onset. Speech outcomes of CI in cases with cochlear nerve (CN) deficiency were significantly poorer (p = 0.008). Molecular etiologies, including TWIST1, ACTG1, m.A7445G, and a copy-number variant (CNV) carrying ACTB, were related to AN here.

Conclusion

CI is a viable therapy option for patients with AN; CN deficiency might impact outcomes of CI.

Systematic Literature Review and Early Benefit of Cochlear Implantation in Two Pediatric Auditory Neuropathy Cases

Approximately 1 in 10 children with hearing loss is affected by auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder (ANSD). People who have ANSD usually have great difficulty understanding speech or communicating. However, it is possible for these patients to have audiograms that may indicate profound hearing loss up to normal hearing. This disorder is prognosed with positive, intact or present otoacoustic emissions (OAE) and/or cochlear microphonics (CM) as well as abnormal or absent auditory brainstem responses (ABR). Treatment methods include conventional hearing aids as well as cochlear implants. Cochlear implants (CI) usually promise better speech understanding for ANSD patients. We performed a systematic literature review aiming to show what improvements can effectively be achieved with cochlear implants in children with ANSD and compare this with our experience with two cases of ANSD implanted at our clinic. The retrospective review of two young CI patients diagnosed with ANSD during infancy demonstrated improvements over time in speech development communicated by their parents.

Cortical Auditory Plasticity Following Cochlear Implantation in Children With Auditory Neuropathy Spectrum Disorder: A Prospective Study

OBJECTIVES

The cortical auditory evoked potential (CAEP) can provide an insight into the maturation of the central auditory nervous system by recording the auditory cortex responses to speech stimuli. This study aimed to explore the central auditory system development in children with auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder (ANSD) using cochlear implants (CIs) and to find the correlation of CAEP biomarkers with speech perception.

METHODS

This study was performed on 23 children with prelingual deafness, diagnosed with ANSD, as well as 23 children with prelingual deafness, without ANSD as the control group. All children underwent unilateral CI before the age of 3 years. Children with ANSD were classified into two groups, based on their CAEP results prior to implantation: children with a clear CAEP response (ANSD-I) and children without an identifiable CAEP (ANSD-II). The P1 component of CAEPs and speech intelligibility rating (SIR) were recorded before the initial device activation (baseline) and at 6, 12, and 24 months postimplantation.

RESULTS

The P1 CAEP responses were present in all children in the control group, while they were recorded in only 52% of ANSD children before the CI surgery. The longitudinal analysis revealed a significant reduction in the P1 latency and a significant improvement in the P1 amplitude across different time points in all study groups. However, the P1 latency and P1 amplitude were significantly shorter and larger in the control group than the ANSD group, respectively. Also, children in the ANSD-I group exhibited a slightly shorter P1 latency, a larger P1 amplitude, and a higher SIR score than the ANSD-II group after 2 years of follow-up. The P1 CAEP latency was significantly correlated with the SIR score.

CONCLUSION

The CAEP can be used as an objective indicator of auditory cortical maturation and a predictor of speech perception performance in implanted children with ANSD.

Sound- and current-driven laminar profiles and their application method mimicking acoustic responses in the mouse auditory cortex in vivo

The local application of electrical currents to the cortex is one of the most commonly used techniques to activate neurons, and this intracortical stimulation (ICS) could potentially lead to new types of neuroprosthetic devices that can be directly applied to the cortex. To identify whether ICS-activated circuits are physiological vs. profoundly artificial, it is necessary to record in vivo the responses of the same neuronal population to both natural sensory stimuli and artificial electric stimuli. However, few studies have extensively reported simultaneous electrophysiological recordings combined with ICS. Here, we evaluated the similarity between sound- and ICS-driven cortical response patterns in different cortical layers. In the mouse auditory cortex, we performed laminar recordings using 16-channel silicon electrodes and ICS using sharp glass-pipette electrodes containing biocytin for layer identification. In different cortical depths, short current pulses were delivered in vivo to mice under urethane anesthesia. For the recorded data, we mainly analyzed properties of local field potentials and current source densities (CSDs). We demonstrated that electrical stimulation evoked different excitation patterns according to the stimulated cortical layer; responses to electric stimuli in layer 4 were most likely to mimic acoustic responses. Next, we proposed a CSD-based stimulation method to artificially synthesize sound-driven responses, using an approximation method associated with a linear combination of CSD patterns electrically stimulated in the different cortical layers. The result indicates that synthesized responses were consistent with the canonical model of sound processing. Using these approaches, we provide a new technique in which natural sound-driven responses can be mimicked by well-designed computational stimulation pattern sequences in a layer-dependent manner. These findings may aid in the future development of an electrical stimulation methodology for a cortical prosthesis.

Elongated EABR wave latencies observed in patients with auditory neuropathy caused by OTOF mutation

Objectives

We sought to determine how the pathology altered electrically evoked auditory brainstem responses (EABRs) in patients with hearing loss by evaluating EABRs in auditory neuropathy patients with OTOF mutations comparing with various types of congenital deafness.

Methods

We included 15 patients with congenital hearing loss, grouped according to pathology: OTOF mutations (n = 4), GJB2 mutations (n = 4), SLC26A4 mutations (n = 4), or cytomegalovirus infections (n = 3). EABRs were recorded when patients underwent cochlear implantation surgery. We evaluated the latencies and amplitudes of the recorded EABRs and compared them statistically between four groups.

Results

The EABR latencies of Wave III and Wave V, and of the interval between them, were significantly longer in the OTOF mutation group than in the GJB2 and SLC26A4 mutation groups (Wave III) and in all three other groups (Wave V and Wave III-V latency); amplitudes were not significantly different between groups.

Conclusions

Our results suggest OTOF mutations cause delayed (or slowed) postsynaptic neurotransmission, although the presumed mechanism involved reduced presynaptic transmission between hair cells and spiral ganglion neurons.

Level of Evidence

Mainly a case report.