1
|
Kimani M, Molyneux S, Charo A, Zakayo SM, Sanga G, Njeru R, Davies A, Kelley M, Abubakar A, Marsh V. Layered vulnerability and researchers' responsibilities: learning from research involving Kenyan adolescents living with perinatal HIV infection. BMC Med Ethics 2024; 25:21. [PMID: 38378641 PMCID: PMC10877892 DOI: 10.1186/s12910-023-00972-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2022] [Accepted: 10/16/2023] [Indexed: 02/22/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Carefully planned research is critical to developing policies and interventions that counter physical, psychological and social challenges faced by young people living with HIV/AIDS, without increasing burdens. Such studies, however, must navigate a 'vulnerability paradox', since including potentially vulnerable groups also risks unintentionally worsening their situation. Through embedded social science research, linked to a cohort study involving Adolescents Living with HIV/AIDS (ALH) in Kenya, we develop an account of researchers' responsibilities towards young people, incorporating concepts of vulnerability, resilience, and agency as 'interacting layers'. METHODS Using a qualitative, iterative approach across three linked data collection phases including interviews, group discussions, observations and a participatory workshop, we explored stakeholders' perspectives on vulnerability and resilience of young people living with HIV/AIDS, in relation to home and community, school, health care and health research participation. A total of 62 policy, provider, research, and community-based stakeholders were involved, including 27 ALH participating in a longitudinal cohort study. Data analysis drew on a Framework Analysis approach; ethical analysis adapts Luna's layered account of vulnerability. RESULTS ALH experienced forms of vulnerability and resilience in their daily lives in which socioeconomic context, institutional policies, organisational systems and interpersonal relations were key, interrelated influences. Anticipated and experienced forms of stigma and discrimination in schools, health clinics and communities were linked to actions undermining ART adherence, worsening physical and mental health, and poor educational outcomes, indicating cascading forms of vulnerability, resulting in worsened vulnerabilities. Positive inputs within and across sectors could build resilience, improve outcomes, and support positive research experiences. CONCLUSIONS The most serious forms of vulnerability faced by ALH in the cohort study were related to structural, inter-sectoral influences, unrelated to study participation and underscored by constraints to their agency. Vulnerabilities, including cascading forms, were potentially responsive to policy-based and interpersonal actions. Stakeholder engagement supported cohort design and implementation, building privacy, stakeholder understanding, interpersonal relations and ancillary care policies. Structural forms of vulnerability underscore researchers' responsibilities to work within multi-sectoral partnerships to plan and implement studies involving ALH, share findings in a timely way and contribute to policies addressing known causes of vulnerabilities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mary Kimani
- Kenya Medical Research Institute Wellcome Trust Research Programme, Kilifi, Kenya
| | - Sassy Molyneux
- Kenya Medical Research Institute Wellcome Trust Research Programme, Kilifi, Kenya.
- Health Systems Collaborative, Centre for Global Health Research, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
| | - Anderson Charo
- Kenya Medical Research Institute Wellcome Trust Research Programme, Kilifi, Kenya
| | - Scholastica M Zakayo
- Ethox Centre, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Gladys Sanga
- Kenya Medical Research Institute Wellcome Trust Research Programme, Kilifi, Kenya
| | - Rita Njeru
- Ethox Centre, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Alun Davies
- Kenya Medical Research Institute Wellcome Trust Research Programme, Kilifi, Kenya
- Health Systems Collaborative, Centre for Global Health Research, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Maureen Kelley
- Ethox Centre, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Amina Abubakar
- Aga Khan University, Institute for Human Development, Nairobi, Kenya
| | - Vicki Marsh
- Kenya Medical Research Institute Wellcome Trust Research Programme, Kilifi, Kenya
- Centre for Global Health Research, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Peter Medawar Building for Pathogen Biology, 3 South Parks Road, Oxford, OX13SY, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Zulu JM, Mwamba T, Rosen A, Matenga TFL, Mulanda J, Kaimba M, Chilembo M, Silondwa M, Kamboyi RL, Simwanza SC, Sichone G, Chavula MP. Community engagement for the Voluntary Medical Male Circumcision (VMMC) program: an analysis of key stakeholder roles to promote a sustainable program in Zambia. Gates Open Res 2023; 6:50. [PMID: 37069966 PMCID: PMC10105033 DOI: 10.12688/gatesopenres.13587.2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/18/2023] [Indexed: 05/31/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: Within the Voluntary Medical Male Circumcision (VMMC) programme, community engagement has been central in facilitating the acceptance of VMMC, especially in non-circumcising communities. We used the case of the development of community engagement plans for sustainability of VMMC in Zambia to illustrate diversity of stakeholders, their power, roles, and strategies in community engagement. Methods: Data were collected using document review, in-depth interviews (n=35) and focus group discussions (n=35) with community stakeholders, health workers, health centre committees, counsellors, teachers, community volunteers and parents/caregivers. Data were analysed using thematic analysis. The analysis was guided by the power and interest model. Results: Differences were noted between the rural and urban sites in terms of power/influence and interest rating of community stakeholders who could be involved in the sustainability phase of the VMMC response in Zambia. For example, in the urban setting, neighbourhood health committees (NHCs), health workers, leaders of clubs, community health workers (CHWs), radio, television and social media platforms were ranked highest. From this list, social media and television platforms were not highly ranked in rural areas. Some stakeholders had more sources of power than others. Forms or sources of power included technical expertise, local authority, financial resources, collective action (action through schools, churches, media platforms, other community spaces), and relational power. Key roles and strategies included strengthening and broadening local coordination systems, enhancing community involvement, promoting community-led monitoring and evaluation, through the use of locally recognised communication spaces and channels, facilitating ownership of VMMC, and improving local accountability processes in VMMC activities. Conclusions: By consulting with the most relevant stakeholders, and considering community needs in programme development, the VMMC programme may be able to leverage the community structures and systems to reduce long term demand generation costs for VMMC and increase the acceptability and frequency of male circumcision.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph M. Zulu
- Department of Health Promotion and Education, School of Public Health, University of Zambia, PO Box 50110, Lusaka, Zambia, University of Zambia, Lusaka, 10101, Zambia
| | - Trevor Mwamba
- Clinton Health Access Initiative, Clinton Health Access Initiative, Lusaka, 10101, Zambia
| | - Alyssa Rosen
- Clinton Health Access Initiative, Clinton Health Access Initiative, Lusaka, 10101, Zambia
| | - Tulani Francis L. Matenga
- Department of Health Promotion and Education, School of Public Health, University of Zambia, PO Box 50110, Lusaka, Zambia, University of Zambia, Lusaka, 10101, Zambia
| | - Joseph Mulanda
- Department of Health Promotion and Education, School of Public Health, University of Zambia, PO Box 50110, Lusaka, Zambia, University of Zambia, Lusaka, 10101, Zambia
| | - Mutale Kaimba
- Department of Health Promotion and Education, School of Public Health, University of Zambia, PO Box 50110, Lusaka, Zambia, University of Zambia, Lusaka, 10101, Zambia
| | - Masitano Chilembo
- Clinton Health Access Initiative, Clinton Health Access Initiative, Lusaka, 10101, Zambia
| | - Madaliso Silondwa
- Clinton Health Access Initiative, Clinton Health Access Initiative, Lusaka, 10101, Zambia
| | - Royd L. Kamboyi
- Ministry of Health, Ministry of Health, Lusaka, Lusaka, 10101, Zambia
| | | | - George Sichone
- Department of Health Promotion and Education, School of Public Health, University of Zambia, PO Box 50110, Lusaka, Zambia, University of Zambia, Lusaka, 10101, Zambia
| | - Malizgani Paul Chavula
- Department of Health Promotion and Education, School of Public Health, University of Zambia, PO Box 50110, Lusaka, Zambia, University of Zambia, Lusaka, 10101, Zambia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Khirikoekkong N, Asarath SA, Nosten S, Hanboonkunupakarn B, Jatupornpimol N, Roest J, Parker M, Nosten F, McGready R, Cheah PY, Kelley M. Culturally responsive research ethics: How the socio-ethical norms of Arr-nar/Kreng-jai inform research participation at the Thai-Myanmar border. PLOS GLOBAL PUBLIC HEALTH 2023; 3:e0001875. [PMID: 37141207 PMCID: PMC10159138 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0001875] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2022] [Accepted: 04/12/2023] [Indexed: 05/05/2023]
Abstract
Despite advances, international research ethics guidelines still tend to consist of high-level ethical principles reflecting residual influence from North American and European traditions of ethics. Local ethics committees and community advisory boards can offer more culturally-sensitive approaches to training but most institutions lack substantive practical ethics guidance to engage rich moral understandings in day-to-day research practice in diverse cultural contexts. To address this gap, we conducted an international series of qualitative research ethics case studies, linked prospectively to active research programs in diverse settings. Here, we share findings from two case studies with a research team working on malaria and hepatitis B prevention with pregnant women in clinics serving migrants along the Thai-Myanmar border. In this sociocultural ethical analysis, we consider how core ethical requirements of voluntary participation, provision of fair benefits, and understandings of research risks and burdens are shaped, enriched, and in some instances challenged, by deep-seated and widespread Burmese, Karen and Thai cultural norms known as Arr-nar (in Burmese and Karen) or Kreng-jai (in Thai), encompassing multiple meanings including consideration for others and graciousness. We offer a model illustrating how one might map ethically significant sociocultural influences across the research practice pathway and close with lessons for developing a more culturally responsive research ethics practice in other international settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Napat Khirikoekkong
- Shoklo Malaria Research Unit, Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Mae Sot, Thailand
- Mahidol Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit, Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Supa-At Asarath
- Mahidol Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit, Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Suphak Nosten
- Shoklo Malaria Research Unit, Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Mae Sot, Thailand
| | - Borimas Hanboonkunupakarn
- Department of Clinical Tropical Medicine, Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Nattapat Jatupornpimol
- Mahidol Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit, Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Jennifer Roest
- Wellcome Centre for Ethics & Humanities, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
- The Ethox Centre, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Michael Parker
- Wellcome Centre for Ethics & Humanities, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
- The Ethox Centre, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Francois Nosten
- Shoklo Malaria Research Unit, Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Mae Sot, Thailand
- Centre for Tropical Medicine & Global Health, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Rose McGready
- Shoklo Malaria Research Unit, Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Mae Sot, Thailand
- Centre for Tropical Medicine & Global Health, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Phaik Yeong Cheah
- Mahidol Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit, Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
- The Ethox Centre, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
- Centre for Tropical Medicine & Global Health, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Maureen Kelley
- Wellcome Centre for Ethics & Humanities, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
- The Ethox Centre, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Zulu JM, Mwamba T, Rosen A, Matenga TFL, Mulanda J, Kaimba M, Chilembo M, Silondwa M, Kamboyi RL, Simwanza SC, Sichone G, Chavula MP. Community engagement for the Voluntary Medical Male Circumcision (VMMC) program: an analysis of key stakeholder roles to promote a sustainable program in Zambia. Gates Open Res 2022; 6:50. [PMID: 37069966 PMCID: PMC10105033 DOI: 10.12688/gatesopenres.13587.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Within the Voluntary Medical Male Circumcision (VMMC) programme, community engagement has been central in facilitating the acceptance of VMMC, especially in non-circumcising communities. We used the case of the development of community engagement plans for sustainability of VMMC in Zambia to illustrate diversity of stakeholders, their power, roles, and strategies in community engagement. Methods: Data were collected using document review, in-depth interviews (n=35) and focus group discussions (n=35) with community stakeholders, health workers, health centre committees, counsellors, teachers, community volunteers and parents/caregivers. Data were analysed using thematic analysis. The analysis was guided by the power and interest model. Results: Differences were noted between the rural and urban sites in terms of power/influence and interest rating of community stakeholders who could be involved in the sustainability phase of the VMMC response in Zambia. For example, in the urban setting, neighbourhood health committees (NHCs), health workers, leaders of clubs, community health workers (CHWs), radio, television and social media platforms were ranked highest. From this list, social media and television platforms were not highly ranked in rural areas. Some stakeholders had more sources of power than others. Forms or sources of power included technical expertise, local authority, financial resources, collective action (action through schools, churches, media platforms, other community spaces), and relational power. Key roles and strategies included strengthening and broadening local coordination systems, enhancing community involvement, promoting community-led monitoring and evaluation, through the use of locally recognised communication spaces and channels, facilitating ownership of VMMC, and improving local accountability processes in VMMC activities. Conclusions: By consulting with the most relevant stakeholders, and considering community needs in programme development, the VMMC programme may be able to leverage the community structures and systems to reduce long term demand generation costs for VMMC and increase the acceptability and frequency of male circumcision.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph M. Zulu
- Department of Health Promotion and Education, School of Public Health, University of Zambia, PO Box 50110, Lusaka, Zambia, University of Zambia, Lusaka, 10101, Zambia
| | - Trevor Mwamba
- Clinton Health Access Initiative, Clinton Health Access Initiative, Lusaka, 10101, Zambia
| | - Alyssa Rosen
- Clinton Health Access Initiative, Clinton Health Access Initiative, Lusaka, 10101, Zambia
| | - Tulani Francis L. Matenga
- Department of Health Promotion and Education, School of Public Health, University of Zambia, PO Box 50110, Lusaka, Zambia, University of Zambia, Lusaka, 10101, Zambia
| | - Joseph Mulanda
- Department of Health Promotion and Education, School of Public Health, University of Zambia, PO Box 50110, Lusaka, Zambia, University of Zambia, Lusaka, 10101, Zambia
| | - Mutale Kaimba
- Department of Health Promotion and Education, School of Public Health, University of Zambia, PO Box 50110, Lusaka, Zambia, University of Zambia, Lusaka, 10101, Zambia
| | - Masitano Chilembo
- Clinton Health Access Initiative, Clinton Health Access Initiative, Lusaka, 10101, Zambia
| | - Madaliso Silondwa
- Clinton Health Access Initiative, Clinton Health Access Initiative, Lusaka, 10101, Zambia
| | - Royd L. Kamboyi
- Ministry of Health, Ministry of Health, Lusaka, Lusaka, 10101, Zambia
| | | | - George Sichone
- Department of Health Promotion and Education, School of Public Health, University of Zambia, PO Box 50110, Lusaka, Zambia, University of Zambia, Lusaka, 10101, Zambia
| | - Malizgani Paul Chavula
- Department of Health Promotion and Education, School of Public Health, University of Zambia, PO Box 50110, Lusaka, Zambia, University of Zambia, Lusaka, 10101, Zambia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Chi PC, Owino EA, Jao I, Bejon P, Kapulu M, Marsh V, Kamuya D. Ethical considerations around volunteer payments in a malaria human infection study in Kenya: an embedded empirical ethics study. BMC Med Ethics 2022; 23:46. [PMID: 35443642 PMCID: PMC9019790 DOI: 10.1186/s12910-022-00783-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2022] [Accepted: 04/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Human Infection Studies (HIS) have emerged as an important research approach with the potential to fast track the global development of vaccines and treatments for infectious diseases, including in low resource settings. Given the high level of burdens involved in many HIS, particularly prolonged residency and biological sampling requirements, it can be challenging to identify levels of study payments that provide adequate compensation but avoid 'undue' levels of inducement to participate. Through this embedded ethics study, involving 97 healthy volunteers and other research stakeholders in a malaria HIS programme in Kenya, and using in-depth interviews, focus group discussions and observations during and after a malaria HIS, we give a grounded account of ethical issues emerging in relation to study payments in this setting. While careful community, national, international scientific and ethics review processes meant that risks of serious harm were highly unlikely, the levels of motivation to join HIS seen could raise concerns about study payments being too high. Particular value was placed on the reliability, rather than level, of study payment in this setting, where subsistence livelihoods are common. Study volunteers were generally clear about the study aims at the point of recruitment, and this knowledge was retained over a year later, although most reported experiencing more burdens than anticipated at enrolment. Strict study screening procedures, regular clinical and laboratory monitoring of volunteers, with prompt treatment with antimalarial at predetermined endpoints suggested that the risks of serious harm were highly unlikely. Ethical concerns emerged in relation to volunteers' attempts to conceal symptoms, hoping to prolong residency periods and increase study payments; and volunteers making decisions that compromised important family relationships and personal values. Our findings support an interpretation that, although study volunteers were keen to join the study to access cash payments, they also paid attention to other features of the study and the general clinical research landscape, including levels of risk associated with study participation. Overall, our analysis shows that the ethical concerns emerging from the study payments can be addressed through practical measures, hinged on reducing burdens and strengthening communication, raising important issues for research policy and planning.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Primus Che Chi
- Centre for Geographic Medicine Research (Coast), Kenya Medical Research Institute-Wellcome Trust Research Programme, Kilifi, Kenya.
| | - Esther Awuor Owino
- Centre for Geographic Medicine Research (Coast), Kenya Medical Research Institute-Wellcome Trust Research Programme, Kilifi, Kenya
| | - Irene Jao
- Centre for Geographic Medicine Research (Coast), Kenya Medical Research Institute-Wellcome Trust Research Programme, Kilifi, Kenya
| | - Philip Bejon
- Centre for Geographic Medicine Research (Coast), Kenya Medical Research Institute-Wellcome Trust Research Programme, Kilifi, Kenya
- Nuffield Department of Medicine, Centre for Tropical Medicine and Global Health, University Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Melissa Kapulu
- Centre for Geographic Medicine Research (Coast), Kenya Medical Research Institute-Wellcome Trust Research Programme, Kilifi, Kenya
- Nuffield Department of Medicine, Centre for Tropical Medicine and Global Health, University Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Vicki Marsh
- Nuffield Department of Medicine, Centre for Tropical Medicine and Global Health, University Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Dorcas Kamuya
- Centre for Geographic Medicine Research (Coast), Kenya Medical Research Institute-Wellcome Trust Research Programme, Kilifi, Kenya
- Nuffield Department of Medicine, Centre for Tropical Medicine and Global Health, University Oxford, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Sudoi A, De Vries J, Kamuya D. A scoping review of considerations and practices for benefit sharing in biobanking. BMC Med Ethics 2021; 22:102. [PMID: 34315443 PMCID: PMC8317360 DOI: 10.1186/s12910-021-00671-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2021] [Accepted: 07/19/2021] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite the rapid global growth of biobanking over the last few decades, and their potential for the advancement of health research, considerations specific to the sharing of benefits that accrue from biobanks have received little attention. Questions such as the types and range of benefits that can arise in biobanking, who should be entitled to those benefits, when they should be provided, by whom and in what form remain mostly unanswered. We conducted a scoping review to describe benefit sharing considerations and practices in biobanking in order to inform current and future policy and practice. METHODS Drawing on the Arksey and O'Malley framework, we conducted a scoping review of the literature in three online databases (PubMed, Cochrane library, and Google Scholar). We extracted and charted data to capture general characteristics, definitions and examples of benefits and benefit sharing, justification for benefit sharing, challenges in benefit sharing, governance mechanisms as well as proposed benefit sharing mechanisms. RESULTS 29 articles published between 1999 and 2020 met the inclusion criteria for the study. The articles included 5 empirical and 24 non-empirical studies. Only 12 articles discussed benefit sharing as a stand-alone subject, while the remaining 17 integrated a discussion of benefits as one issue amongst others. Major benefit sharing challenges in biobanking were found to be those associated with uncertainties around the future use of samples and in resultant benefits. CONCLUSION Most of the benefit sharing definitions and approaches currently in use for biobanking are similar to those used in health research. These approaches may not recognise the distinct features of biobanking, specifically relating to uncertainties associated with the sharing and re-use of samples. We therefore support approaches that allow decisions about benefit sharing to be made progressively once it is apparent who samples are to be shared with, the intended purpose and expected benefits. We also highlight gaps in key areas informing benefit sharing in biobanking and draw attention to the need for further empirical research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Allan Sudoi
- Department of Health Systems and Research Ethics (HSRE), KEMRI-Wellcome Trust Research Programme, KEMRI Centre for Geographic Medicine, Coast, P.O. Box 230-80108, Kilifi, Kenya.
| | - Jantina De Vries
- Department of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Dorcas Kamuya
- Department of Health Systems and Research Ethics (HSRE), KEMRI-Wellcome Trust Research Programme, KEMRI Centre for Geographic Medicine, Coast, P.O. Box 230-80108, Kilifi, Kenya
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Molyneux S, Sukhtankar P, Thitiri J, Njeru R, Muraya K, Sanga G, Walson JL, Berkley J, Kelley M, Marsh V. Model for developing context-sensitive responses to vulnerability in research: managing ethical dilemmas faced by frontline research staff in Kenya. BMJ Glob Health 2021; 6:e004937. [PMID: 34244204 PMCID: PMC8268889 DOI: 10.1136/bmjgh-2021-004937] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2021] [Accepted: 05/20/2021] [Indexed: 01/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Health research in low-resource settings often involves individuals and populations defined as 'vulnerable'. There is growing attention in the literature to the ethical dilemmas that frontline research staff face while conducting such research. However, there is little documented as to how research staff might support one another in identifying and handling these dilemmas in different contexts. Over the course of conducting empirical ethics research embedded in the Childhood Acute Illness & Nutrition Network, we developed an approach to examine and respond to the ethical issues and dilemmas faced by the study teams, particularly frontline staff. In this paper we describe the specific tools and approach we developed, which centred on regular cross-team ethics reflection sessions, and share lessons learnt. We suggest that all studies involving potentially vulnerable participants should incorporate activities and processes to support frontline staff in identifying, reflecting on and responding to ethical dilemmas, throughout studies. We outline the resources needed to do this and share piloted tools for further adaptation and evaluation. Such initiatives should complement and feed into-and certainly not in any way replace or substitute for-strong institutional ethics review, safeguarding and health and safety policies and processes, as well broader staff training and career support initiatives.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sassy Molyneux
- KEMRI-Wellcome Research Programme, Centre for Geographic Medicine Research Coast, Kilifi, Kenya
- Centre for Tropical Medicine and Global Health, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Priya Sukhtankar
- Department of Child Health, Gloucester Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Gloucester, UK
| | - Johnstone Thitiri
- KEMRI-Wellcome Research Programme, Centre for Geographic Medicine Research Coast, Kilifi, Kenya
| | - Rita Njeru
- Ethox Centre and Wellcome Centre for Ethics & Humanities, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Kui Muraya
- Kemri-Wellcome Trust, Centre for Geographic Medicine Research Coast, Nairobi, Kenya
| | - Gladys Sanga
- KEMRI-Wellcome Research Programme, Centre for Geographic Medicine Research Coast, Kilifi, Kenya
| | - Judd L Walson
- Department of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - James Berkley
- KEMRI-Wellcome Research Programme, Centre for Geographic Medicine Research Coast, Kilifi, Kenya
- Centre for Tropical Medicine and Global Health, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Maureen Kelley
- Ethox Centre and Wellcome Centre for Ethics & Humanities, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Vicki Marsh
- KEMRI-Wellcome Research Programme, Centre for Geographic Medicine Research Coast, Kilifi, Kenya
- Centre for Tropical Medicine and Global Health, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Saleh S, Sambakunsi H, Nyirenda D, Kumwenda M, Mortimer K, Chinouya M. Participant compensation in global health research: a case study. Int Health 2021; 12:524-532. [PMID: 33165559 PMCID: PMC7651450 DOI: 10.1093/inthealth/ihaa064] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2020] [Revised: 06/11/2020] [Accepted: 08/25/2020] [Indexed: 01/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Compensation for research participants can be provided for reasons including reimbursement of costs; compensation for time lost, discomfort or inconvenience; or expression of appreciation for participation. This compensation involves numerous ethical complexities, at times entailing competing risks. In the context of transnational research, often incorporating contexts of economic inequality, power differentials and post-colonialism, these issues extend into wider questions of ethical research conduct. Methods We describe experiences of conducting a community-based study of air pollution in southern Malawi incorporating ethnographic, participatory and air quality monitoring elements. Decisions surrounding participant compensation evolved in response to changing circumstances in the field. Results Attention to careful researcher–participant relationships and responsiveness to community perspectives allowed dynamic, contextualised decision-making around participant compensation. Despite widely cited risks, including but not restricted to undue influence of monetary compensation on participation, we learned that failure to adequately recognise and compensate participants has its own risks, notably the possibility of ‘ethics dumping’. Conclusions We recommend active engagement with research participants and communities with integration of contextual insights throughout, including participant compensation, as for all elements of research conduct. Equitable research relationships encompass four central values: fairness, care, honesty and respect.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sepeedeh Saleh
- Malawi-Liverpool-Wellcome Trust, Queen Elizabeth Central Hospital, College of Medicine, P.O. Box 30096, Chichiri, Blantyre 3, Malawi.,Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Pembroke Place, Liverpool L3 5QA, UK
| | - Henry Sambakunsi
- Malawi-Liverpool-Wellcome Trust, Queen Elizabeth Central Hospital, College of Medicine, P.O. Box 30096, Chichiri, Blantyre 3, Malawi
| | - Deborah Nyirenda
- Malawi-Liverpool-Wellcome Trust, Queen Elizabeth Central Hospital, College of Medicine, P.O. Box 30096, Chichiri, Blantyre 3, Malawi
| | - Moses Kumwenda
- Malawi-Liverpool-Wellcome Trust, Queen Elizabeth Central Hospital, College of Medicine, P.O. Box 30096, Chichiri, Blantyre 3, Malawi
| | - Kevin Mortimer
- Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Pembroke Place, Liverpool L3 5QA, UK
| | - Martha Chinouya
- Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Pembroke Place, Liverpool L3 5QA, UK
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Sansom LJ, Minh TPN, Hill IE, Ha QNT, Trong TD, Vidaillac C, Quynh ND, Turner HC, Van Nuil JI, Phuong DNT, Kestelyn E. Towards a fair and transparent research participant compensation and reimbursement framework in Vietnam. Int Health 2021; 12:533-540. [PMID: 33165550 PMCID: PMC7651161 DOI: 10.1093/inthealth/ihaa066] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2020] [Revised: 08/06/2020] [Accepted: 08/26/2020] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Providing compensation for participants in clinical research is well established and while international guidelines exist, defining a context-specific and fair compensation for participants in low-resource settings is challenging due to ethical concerns and the lack of practical, national compensation and reimbursement frameworks. Methods We reviewed Oxford University Clinical Research Unit (OUCRU) internal reimbursement documentation over a 10-y period and conducted a scoping literature review to expand our knowledge of compensation and reimbursement practices including ethical concerns. We developed a preliminary reimbursement framework that was presented to community advisory boards (CAB) and clinical investigators to assess its applicability, fairness and transparency. Results The main topics discussed at the workshops centered on fairness and whether the reimbursements could be perceived as financial incentives. Other decisive factors in the decision-making process were altruism and the loss of caregivers’ earnings. Investigators raised the issue of additional burdens, whereas the CAB members were focused on non-monetary elements such as the healthcare quality the patients would receive. All elements discussed were reviewed and, where possible, incorporated into the final framework. Conclusion Our new reimbursement framework provides a consistent, fair and transparent decision-making process and will be implemented across all future OUCRU clinical research in Vietnam.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lucy J Sansom
- Oxford University Clinical Research Unit, University of Oxford, Centre for Tropical Medicine, 764, Vo Van Kiet, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
| | - Trang Pham Nguyen Minh
- Oxford University Clinical Research Unit, University of Oxford, Centre for Tropical Medicine, 764, Vo Van Kiet, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
| | - Iona E Hill
- Oxford University Clinical Research Unit, University of Oxford, Centre for Tropical Medicine, 764, Vo Van Kiet, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
- Department of Pure and Applied Chemistry, Technology and Innovation Centre, University of Strathclyde, 99 George St, Glasgow G1 1RD, UK
| | - Quyen Nguyen Than Ha
- Oxford University Clinical Research Unit, University of Oxford, Centre for Tropical Medicine, 764, Vo Van Kiet, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
| | - Thuan Dang Trong
- Oxford University Clinical Research Unit, University of Oxford, Centre for Tropical Medicine, 764, Vo Van Kiet, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
| | - Celine Vidaillac
- Oxford University Clinical Research Unit, University of Oxford, Centre for Tropical Medicine, 764, Vo Van Kiet, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
- Centre for Tropical Medicine and Global Health, New Richards Building, Old Road Campus, Roosevelt Drive, Oxford, OX3 7LG, UK
| | - Nhu Dong Quynh
- Oxford University Clinical Research Unit, University of Oxford, Centre for Tropical Medicine, 764, Vo Van Kiet, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
| | - Hugo C Turner
- Oxford University Clinical Research Unit, University of Oxford, Centre for Tropical Medicine, 764, Vo Van Kiet, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
- Centre for Tropical Medicine and Global Health, New Richards Building, Old Road Campus, Roosevelt Drive, Oxford, OX3 7LG, UK
- MRC Centre for Global Infectious Disease Analysis, Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, Level 2, Faculty Building South Kensington Campus, London SW7 2AZ, UK
| | - Jennifer Ilo Van Nuil
- Oxford University Clinical Research Unit, University of Oxford, Centre for Tropical Medicine, 764, Vo Van Kiet, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
- Centre for Tropical Medicine and Global Health, New Richards Building, Old Road Campus, Roosevelt Drive, Oxford, OX3 7LG, UK
| | - Dung Nguyen Thi Phuong
- Oxford University Clinical Research Unit, University of Oxford, Centre for Tropical Medicine, 764, Vo Van Kiet, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
| | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Chi PC, Owino E, Jao I, Marsh V, Kamuya D. Considering the Importance of Context for Ethical Practice on Reimbursement, Compensation and Incentives for Volunteers in Human Infection Controlled Studies. THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BIOETHICS : AJOB 2021; 21:40-42. [PMID: 33616502 PMCID: PMC7613538 DOI: 10.1080/15265161.2020.1870771] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/06/2023]
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Irene Jao
- KEMRI-Wellcome Trust Research Programme
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Moving to Another World: Understanding the Impact of Clinical Trial Closure on Research Participants Living With HIV in Uganda. J Assoc Nurses AIDS Care 2020; 30:e96-e108. [PMID: 30664024 DOI: 10.1097/jnc.0000000000000057] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
Despite an increasing need for clinical trials involving people living with HIV (PLWH), little is known about how PLWH experience trial closure, particularly in low-income countries, where the majority of trials take place. We sought to explore the impact of trial closure on PLWH in Uganda. This was an interpretive, grounded theory study using in-depth interviews, conducted between October 2014 and August 2015. Adult participants (N = 23) from 3 trials were included. The findings indicated that trial closure was represented as "moving to another world" and was an emotional transition, linked to a loss of quality care in the research environment, the need to find alternative health facilities, fear of experiencing unwanted side effects, a desire to receive trial feedback, and difficulties linking to posttrial care. We concluded that PLWH leaving trials in a resource-limited setting required holistic care to facilitate their transition back to "usual care."
Collapse
|
12
|
Davies A, Mwango G, Appiah B, Callery JJ, Duy Thanh V, Gumede N, Inglis R, McCracken S, Mkoola K, Montjane K, Ochanda A, Shonai C, Woods-Townsend K. Initiating a network to support engagement between health researchers and schools: recommendations from an international meeting of schools engagement practitioners held in Kilifi, Kenya. Wellcome Open Res 2020; 4:180. [PMID: 32734003 PMCID: PMC7372533 DOI: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.15556.2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/24/2020] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Engagement between health researchers and local schools, or School Engagement, has become incorporated into the engagement strategies of many research institutions worldwide. Innovative initiatives have emerged within Wellcome Trust-funded African and Asian Programmes (APPs) and elsewhere, and continued funding from the Wellcome Trust and other funders is likely to catalyse further innovation. Engagement between scientists and schools is well-described in the scientific literature (1-4), however, engagement between health researchers and schools is much newer, particularly in sub-Saharan Africa, and rarely documented. In November 2018 the KEMRI-Wellcome Trust Research Programme (KWTRP) hosted an international workshop in Kilifi, Kenya, drawing on an emerging community of School Engagement practitioners towards exploring the broad range of goals for School Engagement, learning about the breadth of evaluation approaches and exploring the potential usefulness of establishing a practitioner network. The workshop was attended by 29 engagement researchers/practitioners representing 21 institutions from 10 countries in sub-Saharan Africa and South East Asia and the UK. Workshop sessions combining small group discussions with plenary presentations, enabled a range of goals, activities and evaluation approaches to be shared. This report summarises these discussions, and shares participant views on the possible functions of a network of School Engagement practitioners. A breadth of 'deep' and 'wide' engagement activities were described addressing four broad goals: contributing to science education; capacity strengthening for health research; contributing to goals of community engagement; and health promotion. While wide approaches have greater outreach for raising student awareness, deeper approaches are more likely enable informed student views to be incorporated into research. All activities ultimately aimed at improving health, but also at supporting development in low- and middle-income countries through promoting science-career uptake. Participants identified a range of potential benefits which could emerge from a practitioner network: sharing experiences and resources; facilitating capacity strengthening; and fostering collaboration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alun Davies
- Kenya Medical Research Institute (KEMRI) Wellcome Trust Research Institute, PO Box 230, Kilifi, 80108, Kenya
- Centre for Tropical Medicine and Global Health, Nuffield Department of Medicine, The University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Grace Mwango
- Kenya Medical Research Institute (KEMRI) Wellcome Trust Research Institute, PO Box 230, Kilifi, 80108, Kenya
| | - Bernard Appiah
- Research Program on Public and International Engagement for Health, Texas A&M University School of Public Health, Texas, 77843, USA
- Centre for Science and Health Communication, PMB M71, Ministries, Accra, Ghana
| | - James J. Callery
- Mahidol Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit, Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Vu Duy Thanh
- Oxford University Clinical Research Unit (OUCRU), 764 Vo Van Kiet, Quan 5, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
| | | | - Robert Inglis
- Science Spaza, an initiative of Jive Media Africa, P.O.Box 22106, Mayor’s Walk, 3208, South Africa
| | | | - Kestern Mkoola
- Malawi-Liverpool-Wellcome Trust Clinical Research Programme, Queen Elizabeth Central Hospital, College of Medicine, P.O. Box 30096, Chichiri, Blantyre 3, Malawi
| | - Kagisho Montjane
- Division of Human Genetics, Institute of Infectious Disease and Molecular Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, 7925, South Africa
| | - Alice Ochanda
- UNESCO Natural Sciences (SC/PCB), Regional Office for Eastern Africa, UN Gigiri Complex, Block C, Upper level, Nairobi, P.O. Box 30592, 00100, Kenya
| | - Charity Shonai
- Zimbabwe Early Intervention in Psychosis, Plot P Arnott Road, Westgate, Harare, Zimbabwe
| | - Kathryn Woods-Townsend
- Southampton Education School, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
- NIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre, University of Southampton and University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Davies A, Mwango G, Appiah B, Callery JJ, Duy Thanh V, Gumede N, Inglis R, McCracken S, Mkoola K, Montjane K, Ochanda A, Shonai C, Woods-Townsend K. Initiating a network to support engagement between health researchers and schools: recommendations from an international meeting of schools engagement practitioners held in Kilifi, Kenya. Wellcome Open Res 2019; 4:180. [PMID: 32734003 PMCID: PMC7372533 DOI: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.15556.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/12/2019] [Indexed: 11/09/2023] Open
Abstract
Engagement between health researchers and local schools, or School Engagement, has become incorporated into the engagement strategies of many health research institutions worldwide. Innovative initiatives have emerged within Wellcome Trust-funded African and Asian Programmes (APPs) and elsewhere, and continued funding from the Wellcome Trust and other funders is likely to catalyse further innovation. Worldwide, engagement between scientists and schools is well-described in the scientific literature (1-4), however, engagement between health researchers and schools is much newer, particularly in Africa, and rarely documented in the academic literature. In November 2018 the KEMRI-Wellcome Trust Research Programme (KWTRP) hosted an international meeting in Kilifi, Kenya, drawing on an emerging community of School Engagement practitioners towards exploring the broad range of goals for School Engagement, learning about the breadth of evaluation approaches and exploring the usefulness of a practitioner network. The workshop was attended by 29 participants representing 21 institutions in 11 countries and comprised: engagement staff from Wellcome Trust-funded Africa and Asia Programmes (AAPs); facilitators of previously funded Wellcome Trust African School Engagement projects; collaborators of Wellcome Trust funded school engagement projects; and long-established UK and Africa-based School Engagement with research projects. Workshop sessions combining small group discussions with plenary presentations, enabled a range of goals, activities and evaluation approaches to be shared. This report summarises these dicussions, and shares the possible function of a network of School Engagement practitioners. Four broad goals for schools engagement emerged: contributing to science education; capacity strengthening for health research; contributing to goals of community engagement; and health promotion. These aimed ultimately at improving health, but also at supporting development in low- and middle-income countries through promoting science-career uptake. Practitioners identified a range of benefits for creating a network to strengthen School Engagement practice: sharing experiences and resources; facilitating capacity strengthening; and fostering collaboration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alun Davies
- Kenya Medical Research Institute (KEMRI) Wellcome Trust Research Institute, PO Box 230, Kilifi, 80108, Kenya
- Centre for Tropical Medicine and Global Health, Nuffield Department of Medicine, The University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Grace Mwango
- Kenya Medical Research Institute (KEMRI) Wellcome Trust Research Institute, PO Box 230, Kilifi, 80108, Kenya
| | - Bernard Appiah
- Research Program on Public and International Engagement for Health, Texas A&M University School of Public Health, Texas, 77843, USA
- Centre for Science and Health Communication, PMB M71, Ministries, Accra, Ghana
| | - James J. Callery
- Mahidol Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit, Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Vu Duy Thanh
- Oxford University Clinical Research Unit (OUCRU), 764 Vo Van Kiet, Quan 5, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
| | | | - Robert Inglis
- Science Spaza, an initiative of Jive Media Africa, P.O.Box 22106, Mayor’s Walk, 3208, South Africa
| | | | - Kestern Mkoola
- Malawi-Liverpool-Wellcome Trust Clinical Research Programme, Queen Elizabeth Central Hospital, College of Medicine, P.O. Box 30096, Chichiri, Blantyre 3, Malawi
| | - Kagisho Montjane
- Division of Human Genetics, Institute of Infectious Disease and Molecular Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, 7925, South Africa
| | - Alice Ochanda
- UNESCO Natural Sciences (SC/PCB), Regional Office for Eastern Africa, UN Gigiri Complex, Block C, Upper level, Nairobi, P.O. Box 30592, 00100, Kenya
| | - Charity Shonai
- Zimbabwe Early Intervention in Psychosis, Plot P Arnott Road, Westgate, Harare, Zimbabwe
| | - Kathryn Woods-Townsend
- Southampton Education School, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
- NIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre, University of Southampton and University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Nyangulu W, Mungwira R, Nampota N, Nyirenda O, Tsirizani L, Mwinjiwa E, Divala T. Compensation of subjects for participation in biomedical research in resource - limited settings: a discussion of practices in Malawi. BMC Med Ethics 2019; 20:82. [PMID: 31727044 PMCID: PMC6857211 DOI: 10.1186/s12910-019-0422-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2018] [Accepted: 11/06/2019] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Compensating participants of biomedical research is a common practice. However, its proximity with ethical concerns of coercion, undue influence, and exploitation, demand that participant compensation be regulated. The objective of this paper is to discuss the current regulations for compensation of research participants in Malawi and how they can be improved in relation to ethical concerns of coercion, undue influence, and exploitation. MAIN TEXT In Malawi, national regulations recommend that research subjects be compensated with a stipend of US$10 per study visit. However, no guidance is provided on how this figure was determined and how it should be implemented. While necessary to prevent exploitation, the stipend may expose the very poor to undue influence. The stipend may also raise the cost of doing research disadvantaging local researchers and may have implications on studies where income stipend is the intervention under investigation. We recommend that development and implementation of guidelines of this importance involve interested parties such as the research community and patient groups. CONCLUSION Compensating human research subjects is important but can also act as a barrier to voluntary participation and good research efforts. Deliberate measures need to be put in place to ensure fair compensation of research participants, avoid their exploitation and level the field for locally funded research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wongani Nyangulu
- Public Health Nutrition Research Group (PHNG), College of Medicine, Blantyre, Malawi
| | - Randy Mungwira
- Blantyre Malaria Project, University of Malawi College of Medicine, Blantyre, Malawi
| | - Nginanche Nampota
- Blantyre Malaria Project, University of Malawi College of Medicine, Blantyre, Malawi
| | - Osward Nyirenda
- Blantyre Malaria Project, University of Malawi College of Medicine, Blantyre, Malawi
| | - Lufina Tsirizani
- Malawi-Liverpool Wellcome Trust Clinical Research Programme, Blantyre, Malawi
| | | | - Titus Divala
- Helse Nord Tuberculosis Initiative, University of Malawi College of Medicine, Blantyre, Malawi
- London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, Bloomsbury, London, WC1E 7HT UK
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Quinn AK, Williams K, Thompson LM, Rosa G, Díaz-Artiga A, Thangavel G, Balakrishnan K, Miranda JJ, Rosenthal JP, Clasen TF, Harvey SA. Compensating control participants when the intervention is of significant value: experience in Guatemala, India, Peru and Rwanda. BMJ Glob Health 2019; 4:e001567. [PMID: 31543990 PMCID: PMC6730613 DOI: 10.1136/bmjgh-2019-001567] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2019] [Revised: 07/03/2019] [Accepted: 07/05/2019] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
The Household Air Pollution Intervention Network (HAPIN) trial is a randomised controlled trial in Guatemala, India, Peru and Rwanda to assess the health impact of a clean cooking intervention in households using solid biomass for cooking. The HAPIN intervention—a liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) stove and 18-month supply of LPG—has significant value in these communities, irrespective of potential health benefits. For control households, it was necessary to develop a compensation strategy that would be comparable across four settings and would address concerns about differential loss to follow-up, fairness and potential effects on household economics. Each site developed slightly different, contextually appropriate compensation packages by combining a set of uniform principles with local community input. In Guatemala, control compensation consists of coupons equivalent to the LPG stove’s value that can be redeemed for the participant’s choice of household items, which could include an LPG stove. In Peru, control households receive several small items during the trial, plus the intervention stove and 1 month of fuel at the trial’s conclusion. Rwandan participants are given small items during the trial and a choice of a solar kit, LPG stove and four fuel refills, or cash equivalent at the end. India is the only setting in which control participants receive the intervention (LPG stove and 18 months of fuel) at the trial’s end while also being compensated for their time during the trial, in accordance with local ethics committee requirements. The approaches presented here could inform compensation strategy development in future multi-country trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ashlinn K Quinn
- Fogarty International Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Kendra Williams
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Lisa M Thompson
- Nell Hodgson Woodruff School of Nursing, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Ghislaine Rosa
- Department of Disease Control, Faculty of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Anaité Díaz-Artiga
- Centro de Estudios en Salud, Universidad del Valle de Guatemala, Guatemala City, Guatemala
| | - Gurusamy Thangavel
- Department of Environmental Health Engineering, Sri Ramachandra Insitute of Higher Education and Research, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
| | - Kalpana Balakrishnan
- Department of Environmental Health Engineering, Sri Ramachandra Insitute of Higher Education and Research, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
| | - J Jaime Miranda
- CRONICAS Center of Excellence in Chronic Diseases and Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Lima, Peru
| | - Joshua P Rosenthal
- Fogarty International Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Thomas F Clasen
- Department of Environmental Health, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Steven A Harvey
- Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Zulu JM, Sandøy IF, Moland KM, Musonda P, Munsaka E, Blystad A. The challenge of community engagement and informed consent in rural Zambia: an example from a pilot study. BMC Med Ethics 2019; 20:45. [PMID: 31272489 PMCID: PMC6610979 DOI: 10.1186/s12910-019-0382-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2018] [Accepted: 06/19/2019] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is a need for empirically based research on social and ethical challenges related to informed consent processes, particularly in studies focusing on adolescent sexual and reproductive health. In a pilot study of a school-based pregnancy prevention intervention in rural Zambia, the majority of the guardians who were asked to consent to their daughters' participation, refused. In this paper we explore the reasons behind the low participation in the pilot with particular attention to challenges related to the community engagement and informed consent process. METHODS The pilot was implemented in two schools and examined the acceptability of a package of interventions including economic support to families to keep their girls in school, pocket money for girls, youth club meetings on reproductive health, and community meetings to sensitize the community. Focus group discussions (4) were conducted with girls who participated in the pilot, boys in their class and with parents. Individual semi-structured interviews (11) were conducted with teachers, peer educators and community health workers involved in the coordination of the intervention as well as with religious and traditional leaders. Data were analyzed through thematic analysis. RESULTS The findings indicate that inadequate use of recognized community communication channels during the community engagement process and dissemination of information about the pilot resulted in limited understanding of the pilot concept by the community. This surfaced through uncertainty and fear that the intervention may result in loss of control over daughters, worries about why money was provided unconditionally to girls, and suspicion of links to satanism. The sense of insecurity appeared to be exacerbated by low literacy levels, poverty, fear of loss of bride wealth, perceived disregard for local perceptions of social status, and scanty trust in the actors implementing the pilot. CONCLUSIONS Inadequate use of locally appropriate channels in the dissemination of information created room for interpretation and facilitated development of mistrust, undermining the conditions for community engagement and actual informed consent. A key lesson learnt is the importance of taking seriously the complexity of local values and structures that may impact people's capability to consent or not consent to a study in an informed manner.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph Mumba Zulu
- University of Zambia, School of Public Health, P.O. Box 50110, Lusaka, Zambia
- Center for Intervention Science in Maternal and Child Health (CISMAC),Centre for International Health (CIH), University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | - Ingvild Fossgard Sandøy
- Centre for International Health, Department of Global Public Health and Primary Care, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
- Center for Intervention Science in Maternal and Child Health (CISMAC),Centre for International Health (CIH), University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | - Karen Marie Moland
- Centre for International Health, Department of Global Public Health and Primary Care, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
- Center for Intervention Science in Maternal and Child Health (CISMAC),Centre for International Health (CIH), University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | - Patrick Musonda
- University of Zambia, School of Public Health, P.O. Box 50110, Lusaka, Zambia
- Centre for International Health, Department of Global Public Health and Primary Care, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
- Center for Intervention Science in Maternal and Child Health (CISMAC),Centre for International Health (CIH), University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | - Ecloss Munsaka
- Center for Intervention Science in Maternal and Child Health (CISMAC),Centre for International Health (CIH), University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
- University of Zambia, School of Education, Lusaka, Zambia
| | - Astrid Blystad
- Centre for International Health, Department of Global Public Health and Primary Care, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
- Center for Intervention Science in Maternal and Child Health (CISMAC),Centre for International Health (CIH), University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Davies A, Mwangome N, Yeri B, Mwango G, Mumba N, Marsh V, Kamuya D, Molyneux S, Kinyanjui S, Jones C. Evolution of a programme to engage school students with health research and science in Kenya. Wellcome Open Res 2019; 4:39. [PMID: 30906884 PMCID: PMC6419976 DOI: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.15106.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/07/2019] [Indexed: 01/28/2023] Open
Abstract
Facilitating mutually-beneficial educational activities between researchers and school students is an increasingly popular way for research institutes to engage with communities who host health research, but these activities have rarely been formally examined as a community or public engagement approach in health research. The KEMRI-Wellcome Trust Research Programme (KWTRP) in Kilifi, Kenya, through a Participatory Action Research (PAR) approach involving students, teachers, researchers and education stakeholders, has incorporated 'school engagement' as a key component into their community engagement (CE) strategy. School engagement activities at KWTRP aim at strengthening the ethical practice of the institution in two ways: through promoting an interest in science and research among school students as a form of benefit-sharing; and through creating forums for dialogue aimed at promoting mutual understanding between researchers and school students. In this article, we provide a background of CE in Kilifi and describe the diverse ways in which health researchers have engaged with communities and schools in different parts of the world. We then describe the way in which the KWTRP school engagement programme (SEP) was developed and scaled-up. We conclude with a discussion about the challenges, benefits and lessons learnt from the SEP implementation and scale-up in Kilifi, which can inform the establishment of SEPs in other settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alun Davies
- Health Sysytems and Research Ethics, Center for Geographical Medicine, KEMRI-Wellcome Trust Research Programme, Kilifi, 80108, Kenya.,Centre for Tropical Medicine and Global Health, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Nancy Mwangome
- Health Sysytems and Research Ethics, Center for Geographical Medicine, KEMRI-Wellcome Trust Research Programme, Kilifi, 80108, Kenya
| | - Betty Yeri
- Health Sysytems and Research Ethics, Center for Geographical Medicine, KEMRI-Wellcome Trust Research Programme, Kilifi, 80108, Kenya
| | - Grace Mwango
- Health Sysytems and Research Ethics, Center for Geographical Medicine, KEMRI-Wellcome Trust Research Programme, Kilifi, 80108, Kenya
| | - Noni Mumba
- Health Sysytems and Research Ethics, Center for Geographical Medicine, KEMRI-Wellcome Trust Research Programme, Kilifi, 80108, Kenya
| | - Vicki Marsh
- Health Sysytems and Research Ethics, Center for Geographical Medicine, KEMRI-Wellcome Trust Research Programme, Kilifi, 80108, Kenya.,Centre for Tropical Medicine and Global Health, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Dorcas Kamuya
- Health Sysytems and Research Ethics, Center for Geographical Medicine, KEMRI-Wellcome Trust Research Programme, Kilifi, 80108, Kenya.,Centre for Tropical Medicine and Global Health, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Sassy Molyneux
- Health Sysytems and Research Ethics, Center for Geographical Medicine, KEMRI-Wellcome Trust Research Programme, Kilifi, 80108, Kenya.,Centre for Tropical Medicine and Global Health, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Samson Kinyanjui
- Centre for Tropical Medicine and Global Health, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.,IDEAL, Center for Geographical Medicine, KEMRI-Wellcome Trust Research Programme, Kilifi, Kenya.,Department of Biochemistry, Pwani University, Kilifi, Kenya
| | - Caroline Jones
- Health Sysytems and Research Ethics, Center for Geographical Medicine, KEMRI-Wellcome Trust Research Programme, Kilifi, 80108, Kenya.,Centre for Tropical Medicine and Global Health, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Gordon SB, Chinula L, Chilima B, Mwapasa V, Dadabhai S, Mlombe Y. A Malawi guideline for research study participant remuneration. Wellcome Open Res 2018; 3:141. [PMID: 30662959 PMCID: PMC6329041 DOI: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.14668.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/12/2018] [Indexed: 08/23/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: Research participant remuneration has been variable and inconsistent world-wide for many years owing to uncertainty regarding best practice and a lack of written guidelines for investigators and research ethics committees. Recent recommendations are that researchers and regulators should develop regionally appropriate written guidelines to define reasonable remuneration based on expense reimbursement, compensation for time and burden associated with participation. Incentives to motivate participation are acceptable in specific circumstances. Methods: We wished to develop regionally informed, precise and applicable guidelines in Malawi that might also be generally useful for African researchers and review committees. We therefore reviewed the current literature and developed widely applicable and specific remuneration tables using acceptable and evidence-based payment rationales. Results: There were good international guidelines and limited published regional guidelines. There were published examples of best practice and sufficient material to suggest a structured remuneration table. The rationale and method for the table were discussed at an inter-disciplinary workshop resulting in a reimbursement and compensation model with fixed rates. Payment is recommended pro rata and equally across a study. Conclusions: Transparent, fair remuneration of research participants is recommended by researchers and regulators in Malawi. The means to achieve this are now presented in the Malawi research participant remuneration table.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephen B. Gordon
- Malawi LIverpool Wellcome Trust Clinical Research Program, Blantyre, Malawi
| | - Lameck Chinula
- University of North Carolina Research, University of North Carolina, Blantyre, Malawi
| | - Ben Chilima
- National Health Sciences Research Committee, Lilongwe, Malawi
| | - Victor Mwapasa
- Research Support Centre, University of Malawi College of Medicine, Blantyre, Malawi
| | - Sufia Dadabhai
- JHU Research Project, Johns Hopkins University, Blantyre, Malawi
| | - Yohannie Mlombe
- College of Medicine Research Ethics Committee, University of Malawi College of Medicine, Blantyre, Malawi
| | - Malawi Research Ethics Workshop 2018 Participants
- Malawi LIverpool Wellcome Trust Clinical Research Program, Blantyre, Malawi
- University of North Carolina Research, University of North Carolina, Blantyre, Malawi
- National Health Sciences Research Committee, Lilongwe, Malawi
- Research Support Centre, University of Malawi College of Medicine, Blantyre, Malawi
- JHU Research Project, Johns Hopkins University, Blantyre, Malawi
- College of Medicine Research Ethics Committee, University of Malawi College of Medicine, Blantyre, Malawi
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Gordon SB, Chinula L, Chilima B, Mwapasa V, Dadabhai S, Mlombe Y. A Malawi guideline for research study participant remuneration. Wellcome Open Res 2018; 3:141. [PMID: 30662959 PMCID: PMC6329041 DOI: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.14668.2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/12/2018] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Research participant remuneration has been variable and inconsistent world-wide for many years owing to uncertainty regarding best practice and a lack of written guidelines for investigators and research ethics committees. Recent recommendations are that researchers and regulators should develop regionally appropriate written guidelines to define reasonable remuneration based on expense reimbursement, compensation for time and burden associated with participation. Incentives to motivate participation are acceptable in specific circumstances. Methods: We wished to develop regionally informed, precise and applicable guidelines in Malawi that might also be generally useful for African researchers and review committees. We therefore reviewed the current literature and developed widely applicable and specific remuneration tables using acceptable and evidence-based payment rationales. Results: There were good international guidelines and limited published regional guidelines. There were published examples of best practice and sufficient material to suggest a structured remuneration table. The rationale and method for the table were discussed at an inter-disciplinary workshop resulting in a reimbursement and compensation model with fixed rates. Payment is recommended pro rata and equally across a study. Conclusions: Transparent, fair remuneration of research participants is recommended by researchers and regulators in Malawi. The means to achieve this are now presented in the Malawi research participant remuneration table.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephen B Gordon
- Malawi LIverpool Wellcome Trust Clinical Research Program, Blantyre, Malawi
| | - Lameck Chinula
- University of North Carolina Research, University of North Carolina, Blantyre, Malawi
| | - Ben Chilima
- National Health Sciences Research Committee, Lilongwe, Malawi
| | - Victor Mwapasa
- Research Support Centre, University of Malawi College of Medicine, Blantyre, Malawi
| | - Sufia Dadabhai
- JHU Research Project, Johns Hopkins University, Blantyre, Malawi
| | - Yohannie Mlombe
- College of Medicine Research Ethics Committee, University of Malawi College of Medicine, Blantyre, Malawi
| | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Mweemba C, Ali J, Hyder AA. Providing monetary and non-monetary goods to research participants: perspectives and practices of researchers and Research Ethics Committees in Zambia. Glob Bioeth 2018; 31:90-103. [PMID: 33343185 PMCID: PMC7734108 DOI: 10.1080/11287462.2018.1527672] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/03/2018] [Accepted: 08/20/2018] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
There are disagreements among ethicists on what comprises an "appropriate" good to offer research participants. Debates often focus on the type, quantity, timing, and ethical appropriateness of such offers, particularly in settings where participants may be socio-economically vulnerable, such as in parts of Zambia. This was a Cross-sectional online survey of researchers and Research Ethics Committees (RECs) designed to understand practices, attitudes and policies associated with provision of goods to research participants. Of 122 responding researchers, 69 met eligibility criteria. Responses were also received from five of the six Zambian RECs involved in reviewing research proposals. Forty-nine researchers (71.0%) confirmed previous experience offering goods to participants. Of these, 21 (42.9%) offered participants money only, 18 (36.7%) offered non-monetary goods, while the rest offered both monetary and non-monetary goods. Generally, goods were offered and approved by RECs to compensate for time, lost wages and transportation. One REC and 34.8% of researchers reported being subject to an institutional policy on offering goods to participants. While reimbursement is the main reason for offering goods to participants in Zambia, caution is required when deciding on the type and quantity of goods to offer given the potential for community mistrust and manipulation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chris Mweemba
- Department of Health Policy and Management, School of Public Health, University of Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia
| | - Joseph Ali
- Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Johns Hopkins Berman Institute of Bioethics, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Adnan A. Hyder
- Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Johns Hopkins Berman Institute of Bioethics, Baltimore, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Marathe PA, Tripathi RK, Shetty YC, Kuyare SS, Kamat SK, Thatte UM. Payment for participation in clinical research: Review of proposals submitted to the ethics committees. Perspect Clin Res 2018; 9:64-69. [PMID: 29862198 PMCID: PMC5950612 DOI: 10.4103/picr.picr_159_16] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective In view of dearth of information in national and international guidelines on payment practices in research, the present study was done to find out payments for participation allowed by 3 Ethics committees (ECs) and reasons for payment. Method This was a retrospective observational study which analysed research proposals reviewed by 2 institutional and 1 non-institutional ECs over a period of 2 years. The permission of ECs was obtained and confidentiality of data was maintained. Results Of the 73 studies requiring payment, 89.04% were interventional and 10.96% observational. Reimbursement of travel expenses (60%) was the major reason for payment followed by inconvenience due to participation, loss of wages and time spent. The queries raised by EC in more than 50 % of studies were related to informing patients about the payment in the informed consent document. The investigators complied with the EC requirements regarding payment (15/21) and the remaining provided explanations. The median amount of payment in pharmaceutical sponsored studies was higher compared to investigator initiated studies. Higher payments were approved by ECs on case to case basis in a few studies. The ECs did not have any policy/ standard operating procedure for payment practices. Conclusion The present study first of its kind in India, demonstrated that quantum of payment was not uniform for pharmaceutical sponsored and investigator initiated studies and payments were not considered for majority of observational studies. Travel reimbursement was the most common reason for payment. There is a need to develop guidelines for determining appropriate payment/incentives to participants for specific types of research related activities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Padmaja A Marathe
- Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Seth GS Medical College and KEM Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Raakhi K Tripathi
- Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Seth GS Medical College and KEM Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Yashashri C Shetty
- Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Seth GS Medical College and KEM Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Sunil S Kuyare
- Department of Microbiology, Seth GS Medical College and KEM Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Sandhya K Kamat
- Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Seth GS Medical College and KEM Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Urmila M Thatte
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Seth GS Medical College and KEM Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Kamuya DM, Molyneux CS, Theobald S. Gendered negotiations for research participation in community-based studies: implications for health research policy and practice. BMJ Glob Health 2017; 2:e000320. [PMID: 29225935 PMCID: PMC5717932 DOI: 10.1136/bmjgh-2017-000320] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2017] [Revised: 04/06/2017] [Accepted: 04/09/2017] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
There is a growing literature documenting the complex realities of consent processes in the field, and the negotiations and ethical dilemmas involved. Much has also been written about how gender and power shape household decision-making processes. However, these bodies of literature have rarely been brought together to inform research theory and practice in low-income settings. In this paper, qualitative research (observation, focus group discussions and interviews) were used alongside large clinical community-based studies conducted on the Kenyan Coast to explore how gender and power relations within households and communities and between fieldworkers and communities shape consent processes and interactions. This exploration is embedded in relevant literature and the implications for community-based health research policy and practice are considered. Across diverse forms of households, we observed significant consultation on whether or not to participate in research. Although men are typically described as household decision-makers, in practice, decision-making processes are often far more nuanced, with many women using their agency to control, sometimes subtly, the decisions made. Where decisions are made without adequately consulting women, many find strategies to exercise their choice, in ways that safeguard important relationships within households in the longer term. We also found that the gender of field staff who typically conduct research activities in the field, including consent processes, can influence household dynamics and decision-making processes with important implications for the science and ethics of research. It is essential that frontline field staff and their supervisors are aware of the complex and gendered realities of consent processes at household level, and their implications, and that they develop appropriate context-informed approaches that support ethical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dorcas M Kamuya
- Health Systems and Research Ethics Department, KEMRI-Wellcome Trust Research Programme, Kilifi, Coast, Kenya.,The Ethox Centre, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, Oxfordshire, UK
| | - Catherine S Molyneux
- Health Systems and Research Ethics Department, KEMRI-Wellcome Trust Research Programme, Kilifi, Coast, Kenya.,The Ethox Centre, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, Oxfordshire, UK.,Centre for Tropical Medicine, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, Oxfordshire, UK
| | - Sally Theobald
- Department of International Public Health Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Pembroke Place, Liverpool, UK.,Visiting Fellow Institute of Development Studies, University of Sussex, Brighton, UK
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Abstract
Legal and ethical issues form an important component of modern research, related to the subject and researcher. This article seeks to briefly review the various international guidelines and regulations that exist on issues related to informed consent, confidentiality, providing incentives and various forms of research misconduct. Relevant original publications (The Declaration of Helsinki, Belmont Report, Council for International Organisations of Medical Sciences/World Health Organisation International Guidelines for Biomedical Research Involving Human Subjects, World Association of Medical Editors Recommendations on Publication Ethics Policies, International Committee of Medical Journal Editors, CoSE White Paper, International Conference on Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Registration of Pharmaceuticals for Human Use-Good Clinical Practice) form the literature that are relevant to the ethical and legal aspects of conducting research that researchers should abide by when conducting translational and clinical research. Researchers should note the major international guidelines and regional differences in legislation. Hence, specific ethical advice should be sought at local Ethics Review Committees.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Camille Yip
- Department of Women's Anaesthesia, KK Women's and Children's Hospital, Bukit Timah, Singapore
| | - Nian-Lin Reena Han
- Division of Clinical Support Services, KK Women's and Children's Hospital, Bukit Timah, Singapore
| | - Ban Leong Sng
- Department of Women's Anaesthesia, KK Women's and Children's Hospital, Bukit Timah, Singapore; Anesthesiology and Perioperative Sciences Academic Clinical Program, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Kombe F, Folayan MO, Ambe J, Igonoh A, Abayomi A. Taking the bull by the horns: Ethical considerations in the design and implementation of an Ebola virus therapy trial. Soc Sci Med 2015; 148:163-70. [PMID: 26653137 PMCID: PMC6858863 DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.11.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2015] [Revised: 08/27/2015] [Accepted: 11/11/2015] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
Ebola virus is categorized as one of the most dangerous pathogens in the world. Although there is no known cure for Ebola virus, there is some evidence that the severity of the disease can be curtailed using plasma from survivors. Although there is a general consensus on the importance of research, methodological and ethical challenges for conducting research in an emergency situation have been identified. Performing clinical trials is important, especially for health conditions that are of public health significance (including rare epidemics) to develop new therapies as well as to test the efficacy and effectiveness of new interventions. However, routine clinical trial procedures can be difficult to apply in emergency public health crises hence require a consideration of alternative approaches on how therapies in these situations are tested and brought to the market. This paper examines some of the ethical issues that arise when conducting clinical trials during a highly dangerous pathogen outbreak, with a special focus on the Ebola virus outbreak in West Africa. The issues presented here come from a review of a protocol that was submitted to the Global Emerging Pathogens Treatment Consortium (GET). In reviewing the proposal, which was about conducting a clinical trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of using convalescent plasma in the management of Ebola virus disease, the authors deliberated on various issues, which were documented as minutes and later used as a basis for this paper. The experiences and reflections shared by the authors, who came from different regions and disciplines across Africa, present wide-ranging perspectives on the conduct of clinical trials during a dangerous disease outbreak in a resource-poor setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francis Kombe
- KEMRI-Wellcome Trust Research Programme (KWTRP), P.O Box 230, Kilifi, Kenya.
| | - Morenike O Folayan
- Department of Child Dental Health, Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-Ife, Nigeria; Global Emerging Pathogens Treatment Consortium (GET), 1 Mainland Hospital Road, Yaba, Lagos, Nigeria
| | - Jennyfer Ambe
- Global Emerging Pathogens Treatment Consortium (GET), 1 Mainland Hospital Road, Yaba, Lagos, Nigeria
| | - Adaora Igonoh
- Global Emerging Pathogens Treatment Consortium (GET), 1 Mainland Hospital Road, Yaba, Lagos, Nigeria
| | - Akin Abayomi
- Global Emerging Pathogens Treatment Consortium (GET), 1 Mainland Hospital Road, Yaba, Lagos, Nigeria; Division of Haematology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Tygerberg Hospital, Private Bag X3, Parow Valley, 7505 Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
| |
Collapse
|