Response to Therapeutic Plasma Exchange as a Rescue Treatment in Clinically Isolated Syndromes and Acute Worsening of Multiple Sclerosis: A Retrospective Analysis of 90 Patients

Beneficial therapeutic plasma exchange response in the treatment of severe relapses in patients with multiple sclerosis

PURPOSE

Therapeutic plasma exchange (PLEX) is effective as a second-line treatment of severe relapses of multiple sclerosis (MS) that failed to respond to standard steroid therapy. Our objective was to evaluate the effectiveness of PLEX in the severe MS relapses in a cohort of patients treated at Neurology Clinic, University Clinical Centre of Serbia, Belgrade, from 2007 until 2020.

METHODS

This retrospective study comprised 107 MS patients with 127 severe relapses treated with PLEX. Majority of our patients suffered from relapsing remitting MS (83.2%), 12.1% had secondary progressive MS and 4.7% had primary progressive MS. Mean age was 39.2 years (range, 19-79 years), female/male ratio 2.3:1. Pulse corticosteroid treatment was used before PLEX in 99.3% of patients. Median EDSS score at nadire during relapse was 6.0 (range 2.0-10.0). After PLEX, 73.8% relapses showed a marked clinical improvement, 7.1% showed mild improvement and in 19.0% there was no improvement. Median EDSS at discharge was 4.0 (6.0 at nadir of relapse vs. 4.0 at discharge; p<0.0001) and it was sustained at the same level, 6 month after PLEX. Multivariate regression analysis showed that higher EDSS at nadir during relapse (OR=0.63, 95% CI 0.41-0.96, p=0.039) and older age (OR=1.07, 95% CI 1.02- 1.12, p=0.010) were significantly associated with poor treatment response after 6- month follow-up. Adverse events occurred in 17.3 of procedures and they were completely resolved.

CONCLUSION

Our study in a large cohort of MS patients confirmed that PLEX is effective.

Early clinical response and complications of therapeutic plasma exchange in central nervous system demyelinating diseases

Background

Appropriate treatment reduces the severity and duration of relapses in demyelinating diseases of Central Nervous System (CNS). If high-dose corticosteroids treatment fails, therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) is considered as a rescue treatment.

Objectives

This study aimed to investigate early clinical response and complications of TPE and prognostic factors in CNS demyelinating relapses.

Design

This prospective observational study was designed in a tertiary center during one year.

Methods

All adult patients diagnosed corticosteroid-resistant Multiple Sclerosis (MS), NeuroMyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder (NMOSD), idiotypic Transverse Myelitis or Clinical Isolated Syndrome relapses, were eligible. Clinical response is defined based on Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) at discharge. Clinical and laboratory complications recorded.

Results

Seventy-two patients were analyzed which 58.3% patients were female. MS was diagnosed for 61.1% of cases. Thirty-five patients (48.6%) responded and the mean differences of EDSS significantly decreased 0.60 score (CI95%:0.44-.77). Electrolyte imbalances and thrombocytopenia occurred in 80.6% and 55.6% of cases respectively and 40.3% of patients had systemic reactions. However, 26.4% patients experienced moderate to severe complications. In patients with moderate to severe disability, responders were younger (MD: 8.42 years, CI95%: 1.67-15.17) and had lower EDSS score at admission (median:6, IQR: 5.5-6 against 7.5 IQR: 6.5-8). The risk of failure was higher in active progressive MS patients compared with RRMS patients (OR: 6.06, CI 95%:1.37-26.76). Patients with thrombocytopenia were hospitalized more than others (MD: 1.5 days, CI 95%: 0-3). Females were more prone to hypokalemia and systemic reactions (OR: 3.11, CI 95%:1.17-8.24 and OR: 6.67, CI 95%:2.14-20.81 respectively).

Conclusion

The most common indication of TPE was corticosteroid-resistant severe MS relapses. About half of the patients presented an early clinical response. Lower disability, younger age and RRMS diagnosis are prognostic factors of better response. One out of four patients experienced moderate to severe complications, mainly electrolyte imbalances and systemic reactions. Appropriate interventions against these complications should be considered during TPE, especially in females.

ADC Restriction is Not Associated with Clinical Response to Plasma Exchange Following a Cerebral Attack of Multiple Sclerosis

BACKGROUND

MS is the most common CNS inflammatory demyelinating disease. Plasma exchange (PLEX) has well-demonstrated efficacy in acute corticosteroid-refractory attacks of demyelination but identifying the factors that predict favorable PLEX response remains elusive. We aimed to determine if apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) restriction on brain MRI predicts clinical response to PLEX in individuals with an acute cerebral attack of MS.

METHODS

Retrospective chart review of individuals with a cerebral attack of MS who underwent PLEX at Mayo Clinic.

RESULTS

We identified 34 individuals who fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Twenty-seven (79%) responded to plasma exchange, with 16/34 (47%) having moderate and 11/34 (32%) marked improvement. Twenty-three (68%) people had ADC restriction on brain MRI prior to PLEX.  ADC restriction did not predict response (p = 0.51). Several other pre-PLEX factors, including sex, Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) at initial attack, time to PLEX, and concurrent spinal cord attack, also failed to predict response. Plasma-exchange responders had less disability at 6-month follow-up compared to non-responders (median EDSS 2.5 (range 1.0-10.0) vs. 7.5 (5.5-10.0), p<0.001).

CONCLUSION

Acute cerebral attacks of MS have a high rate of plasma exchange response resulting in a lower EDSS at 6-months. ADC restriction does not predict response to plasma exchange.

Therapeutic plasma exchange in multiple sclerosis patients with an aggressive relapse: an observational analysis in a high-volume center

An evidence-based treatment for a Multiple Sclerosis (MS) relapse is an intravenous administration of 3-5 g of Methylprednisolone. In case of insufficient effect or corticosteroids intolerance, the therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) is indicated. To assess the clinical effect of TPE in treatment of relapse in patients with relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS), we enrolled 155 patients meeting the following criteria (study period: January 2011 to February 2021): (1) age > 18, (2) RRMS according to the McDonald´s 2017 criteria, (3) MS relapse and insufficient effect of corticosteroids/corticosteroids intolerance, (4) baseline EDSS < 8. Exclusion criteria: (1) progressive form of disease, (2) history of previous TPE. Following parameters were monitored: EDSS changes (before and after corticosteroid treatment, before and after TPE; EDSS after TPE was assessed at the next clinical follow-up at the MS Center), and improvement of EDSS according to the number of procedures and baseline severity of relapse. 115 females (74%) and 40 males (26%) were included. The median age was 41 years (IQR 33-47)-131 patients underwent the pulse corticosteroids treatment and TPE, while 24 patients underwent only TPE without any previous corticosteroid treatment. Median baseline EDSS was 4.5 (IQR 3.5-5.5), median EDSS after finishing steroids was 4.5 (IQR 4.0-5.5). EDSS prior to the TPE was 4.5 (IQR 4-6), EDSS after TPE was 4.5 (IQR 3.5-5.5). We observed a significant improvement in the EDSS after TPE (p < 0.001). Sex differences were seen in TPE effectiveness, with median improvement of EDSS in females being -0.5 (IQR 1-0) and in males being 0 (IQR -0.5 to 0), p = 0.048. There was no difference in EDSS improvement by age category: 18-30 years, 31-40 years, 41-50 years, > 50 (p = 0.94), nor by total TPE count (p = 0.91). In this retrospective study of patients with an aggressive relapse and insufficient effect of intravenous corticosteroid treatment, a significant effect of TPE on EDSS improvement was observed. There was no significant difference in TPE effectivity according to the number of procedures, age, nor severity of a relapse. In this cohort, TPE was more effective in females.

Optic neuritis with potential for poor outcome

The Optic Neuritis Treatment Trial previously reported that corticosteroids accelerated visual recovery in optic neuritis (ON) without improving outcome. This finding related largely to multiple sclerosis (MS), and subsequently neurologists tended to await spontaneous recovery in ON. Since then, non-MS cases of ON have been identified with antibodies to aquaporin-4 (AQP4) or myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG). These disorders can closely mimic multiple sclerosis-associated or idiopathic demyelinating optic neuritis (MS/IDON) initially but risk a worse visual outcome. Scrutinising the clinical features and neuroimaging often enables differentiation between MS/IDON and other causes of ON. Early treatment with high-dose corticosteroids is an important determinant of visual outcome in non-MS/IDON. Prompt use of plasma exchange may also save sight. In this review, we contrast the presentations of myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein associated optic neuritis (MOG-ON) and aquaporin 4 associated optic neuritis (AQP4-ON) with MS/IDON and provide an approach to acute management while awaiting results of antibody testing.

Plasma Exchange in the Treatment of Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis: Case Report

Multiple sclerosis is a chronic inflammatory demyelinating disease of the central nervous system characterized by multiple disseminated lesions. The pathogenesis of this disease is still insufficiently clarified, and the course of the disease is unpredictable. It happens that severe relapses do not respond to drug therapy and in such cases it is recommended therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE).

We present a young man with severe motor relapse, weakness of the left leg, pronounced tremor of the right arm, unstable gait and bilaterally reduction of vision. Brain magnetic resonance imaging showed a large number of chronic demyelinating lesions of the white mass, numerous were merged, with signs of brain reduction. The patient underwent five cycles of TPE, which were conducted every other day. Although TPE led to a disturbance of the hemostasis status and some biochemical parameters, the patient’s response to the applied therapy was good. The improvement of the patient’s condition was reflected through the return of vision and a moderate reduction in neurological deficit.

Despite the fact that therapeutic plasma exchange can cause some complications, it should be considered when drug therapy does not lead to improvement in these patients.

Efficacy and safety of plasma exchange or immunoadsorption for the treatment of option neuritis in demyelinating diseases: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

There are no systematic reviews yet that evaluated the effects of PE/IA in patients with optic neuritis (ON) in demyelinating diseases. A meta-analysis of available study is needed to further explore the value of plasma exchange (PE) or immunoadsorption (IA) in treating ON in demyelinating diseases.

METHODS

All relevant articles published on PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Embase, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), VIP Database, Wanfang, Sinomed and ophthalmology professional websites were searched. Study characteristics, demographic characteristics, clinical features and outcome measures were extracted. Response rate, adverse events (AE) rate, serious adverse event (SAE) rate, the log of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR), visual outcome scale (VOS) and expanded disability status scales (EDSS) were evaluated using a random-effects model.

RESULTS

35 studies were included between 1985 and 2020, containing 1191 patients. The response rates of PE and IA in acute attack of ON were 68% and 82% respectively. LogMAR (-0.60 to - 1.42) and VOS (-1.10 to -1.82) had been significantly improved from within 1 month to more than 1 month after PE treatment. Besides, we found that logMAR improved 1.78, 0.95 and 0.38, respectively ,when the time from symptom onset to the first PE/IA was less than 21 days, 21-28 days, and more than 28 days. The pooled mean difference of EDSS was -1.14.Adverse effects rate in patients with PE or IA were 0.20 and 0.06, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The meta-analysis provided evidence that PE/IA treatment was an effective and safe intervention, and it is recommended that early initiation of PE/IA treatment is critical.

Therapeutic plasma exchange in MS refractory relapses: Long-term outcome

INTRODUCTION

Therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) is considered a treatment option for steroid-refractory multiple sclerosis (MS) relapses. Our objective was to assess long-term clinical response to TPE in MS steroid-refractory exacerbations.

METHODS

Retrospective study of relapsing remitting MS (RRMS) patients presenting intravenous methylprednisolone (IVMPS)-refractory relapses, who underwent TPE. Response to TPE was assessed at 1, 3, 6, 12 and 24-months post-treatment, and compared to a second group of RRMS patients with similar demographic and clinical characteristics presenting, IVMPS-refractory relapses but not treated with TPE. Multivariate regression analysis was used to assess potential predictors of significant clinical response.

RESULTS

Between 2011 to 2020, a total of 23 RRMS patients were treated with TPE. Twenty-one patients not receiving the treatment served as controls. No differences in demographic or clinical characteristics, or predictors of clinical improvement after TPE were detected between groups. Seventy-eight percent of patients treated with TPE presented clinical improvement at 24 months. TPE-treated patients presented lower EDSS scores at 6 and at 24 months. Younger age, presence of gadolinium-enhancing lesions and TPE treatment were associated with better clinical outcomes. No life-threatening side effects were reported.

CONCLUSIONS

TPE is a safe and well tolerated procedure that decreases long-term disability in RRMS patients with IVMPS-refractory relapses.

Prognostication and contemporary management of clinically isolated syndrome

Clinically isolated syndrome (CIS) patients present with a single attack of inflammatory demyelination of the central nervous system. Recent advances in multiple sclerosis (MS) diagnostic criteria have expanded the number of CIS patients eligible for a diagnosis of MS at the onset of the disease, shrinking the prevalence of CIS. MS treatment options are rapidly expanding, which is driving the need to recognise MS at its earliest stages. In CIS patients, finding typical MS white matter lesions on the patient's MRI scan remains the most influential prognostic investigation for predicting subsequent diagnosis with MS. Additional imaging, cerebrospinal fluid and serum testing, information from the clinical history and genetic testing also contribute. For those subsequently diagnosed with MS, there is a wide spectrum of long-term clinical outcomes. Detailed assessment at the point of presentation with CIS provides fewer clues to calculate a personalised risk of long-term severe disability.Clinicians should select suitable CIS cases for steroid treatment to speed neurological recovery. Unfortunately, there are still no neuroprotection or remyelination strategies available. The use of MS disease modifying therapy for CIS varies among clinicians and national guidelines, suggesting a lack of robust evidence to guide practice. Clinicians should focus on confirming MS speedily and accurately with appropriate investigations. Diagnosis with CIS provides an opportune moment to promote a healthy lifestyle, in particular smoking cessation. Patients also need to understand the link between CIS and MS. This review provides clinicians an update on the contemporary evidence guiding prognostication and management of CIS.

SMILE: a predictive model for Scoring the severity of relapses in MultIple scLErosis

BACKGROUND

In relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS), relapse severity and residual disability are difficult to predict. Nevertheless, this information is crucial both for guiding relapse treatment strategies and for informing patients.

OBJECTIVE

We, therefore, developed and validated a clinical-based model for predicting the risk of residual disability at 6 months post-relapse in MS.

METHODS

We used the data of 186 patients with RRMS collected during the COPOUSEP multicentre trial. The outcome was an increase of ≥ 1 EDSS point 6 months post-relapse treatment. We used logistic regression with LASSO penalization to construct the model, and bootstrap cross-validation to internally validate it. The model was externally validated with an independent retrospective French single-centre cohort of 175 patients.

RESULTS

The predictive factors contained in the model were age > 40 years, shorter disease duration, EDSS increase ≥ 1.5 points at time of relapse, EDSS = 0 before relapse, proprioceptive ataxia, and absence of subjective sensory disorders. Discriminative accuracy was acceptable in both the internal (AUC 0.82, 95% CI [0.73, 0.91]) and external (AUC 0.71, 95% CI [0.62, 0.80]) validations.

CONCLUSION

The predictive model we developed should prove useful for adapting therapeutic strategy of relapse and follow-up to individual patients.

Autoantibodies against central nervous system antigens in a subset of B cell-dominant multiple sclerosis patients

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic autoimmune disease of the central nervous system (CNS), with characteristic inflammatory lesions and demyelination. The clinical benefit of cell-depleting therapies targeting CD20 has emphasized the role of B cells and autoantibodies in MS pathogenesis. We previously introduced an enzyme-linked immunospot spot (ELISpot)-based assay to measure CNS antigen-specific B cells in the blood of MS patients and demonstrated its usefulness as a predictive biomarker for disease activity in measuring the successful outcome of disease-modifying therapies (DMTs). Here we used a planar protein array to investigate CNS-reactive antibodies in the serum of MS patients as well as in B cell culture supernatants after polyclonal stimulation. Anti-CNS antibody reactivity was evident in the sera of the MS cohort, and the antibodies bound a heterogeneous set of molecules, including myelin, axonal cytoskeleton, and ion channel antigens, in individual patients. Immunoglobulin reactivity in supernatants of stimulated B cells was directed against a broad range of CNS antigens. A group of MS patients with a highly active B cell component was identified by the ELISpot assay. Those antibody reactivities remained stable over time. These assays with protein arrays identify MS patients with a highly active B cell population with antibodies directed against a swathe of CNS proteins.

Plasma Exchange or Immunoadsorption in Demyelinating Diseases: A Meta-Analysis

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is an inflammatory disease mainly affecting the central nervous system. In MS, abnormal immune mechanisms induce acute inflammation, demyelination, axonal loss, and the formation of central nervous system plaques. The long-term treatment involves options to modify the disease progression, whereas the treatment for the acute relapse has its focus in the administration of high-dose intravenous methylprednisolone (up to 1000 mg daily) over a period of three to five days as a first step. If symptoms of the acute relapse persist, it is defined as glucocorticosteroid-unresponsive, and immunomodulation by apheresis is recommended. However, several national and international guidelines have no uniform recommendations on using plasma exchange (PE) nor immunoadsorption (IA) in this case. A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted, including observational studies or randomized controlled trials that investigated the effect of PE or IA on different courses of MS and neuromyelitis optica (NMO). One thousand, three hundred and eighty-three patients were included in the evaluation. Therapy response in relapsing-remitting MS and clinically isolated syndrome was 76.6% (95%CI 63.7–89.8%) in PE- and 80.6% (95%CI 69.3–91.8%) in IA-treated patients. Based on the recent literature, PE and IA may be considered as equal treatment possibilities in patients suffering from acute, glucocorticosteroid-unresponsive MS relapses.

Comparing Plasma Exchange to Escalated Methyl Prednisolone in Refractory Multiple Sclerosis Relapses

Intravenous methyl prednisolone (IVMPS) represents the standard of care for multiple sclerosis (MS) relapses, but fail to improve symptoms in one quarter of patients. In this regard, apart from extending steroid treatment to a higher dose, therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) has been recognized as a treatment option. The aim of this retrospective, monocentric study was to investigate the efficacy of TPE versus escalated dosages of IVMPS in refractory MS relapses. An in-depth medical chart review was performed to identify patients from local databases. Relapse recovery was stratified as “good/full”, “average” and “worst/no” according to function score development. In total, 145 patients were analyzed. Good/average/worst recovery at discharge was observed in 60.9%/32.6%/6.5% of TPE versus 15.2%/14.1%/70.7% of IVMPS patients, respectively. A total of 53.5% of IVMPS patients received TPE as rescue treatment and 54.8% then responded satisfactorily. The multivariable odds ratio (OR) for worst/no recovery was 39.01 (95%–CI: 10.41–146.18; p ≤ 0.001), favoring administration of TPE as first escalation treatment. The effects were sustained at three-month follow-ups, as OR for further deterioration was 6.48 (95%–CI: 2.48–16.89; p ≤ 0.001), favoring TPE. In conclusion, TPE was superior over IVMPS in the amelioration of relapse symptoms at discharge and follow-up. This study provides class IV evidence supporting the administration of TPE as the first escalation treatment to steroid-refractory MS relapses.

Visual Outcomes of Plasma Exchange Treatment of Steroid-Refractory Optic Neuritis: A Retrospective Monocentric Analysis

Introduction

In acute inflammatory optic neuritis (ON) as a typical onset of multiple sclerosis (MS), only few studies have investigated plasma exchange (PLEX) as a sequential treatment after insufficient response to high-dose intravenous glucocorticosteroids. Therefore, we aimed to investigate treatment outcome on visual acuity (VA) with PLEX in patients with steroid-refractory ON.

Methods

In our retrospective monocentric study, medical records were screened for patients with acute ON as their first relapse with sequential MS diagnosis or with an established MS diagnosis from the Bern University Hospital (Switzerland) that were treated with PLEX between 2016 and 2018 due to lacking steroid response. VA prior to steroid administration, and before and after PLEX were assessed and compared using the Friedman multiple comparison test.

Results

In total, 18 patients were included in the analysis. Interval from symptom onset to PLEX was 20.3 days (mean, 95% CI 14.8-25.9). Relevant functional improvement (VA of ≥0.5, after a mean of 15.9 (13.3-18.5) days after start of PLEX) was detected in 16/18 (88.9%) with a significant amelioration as compared to VA before glucocorticosteroids and before PLEX (p < 0.0001). VA improvement at a later time point (38.1 weeks, 25.2-51.0) was present in 15/16 (93.8%) patients. No serious adverse events were detected. PLEX could be performed via peripheral access in 13/18 patients (72.2%).

Conclusion

Our study demonstrates significant improvements of VA with PLEX in a cohort of MS patients with steroid-refractory ON. High response rates may be due to the timely treatment initiation. Despite the small sample size, our data support the early use of PLEX in steroid-refractory ON with a favorable safety profile.

Retrospective study of the adverse events of the treatment for an acute attack of neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder

Intravenous methylprednisolone (IVMP) is an initially recommended therapy for an acute attack of neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD). For those who do not respond to steroid treatment, plasma exchange (PLEX) is generally added-on. We evaluated adverse events of an acute treatment in NMOSD patients in a university-based hospital during January 2009 and December 2017. Ninety-seven patients with 177 attacks were collected. The therapy included IVMP alone (123 events, 62.4%), IVMP followed by PLEX (46 events, 23.4%) and, PLEX alone (8 events, 4.5%). Adverse events occurred in 36.7% of the IVMP group and 61.1% of the PLEX group. The most common adverse event was hyperglycemia (43.5%) followed by infection (29%) in the former and hypocalcemia (63.6%) followed by hypofibrinogen (42.4%), hypotension (30.3%), and infection (21.2%) in the latter. One severe adverse event was documented in the IVMP group and 13 events in the PLEX groups, nevertheless, all were manageable.

Guidelines on the Use of Therapeutic Apheresis in Clinical Practice - Evidence-Based Approach from the Writing Committee of the American Society for Apheresis: The Eighth Special Issue

The American Society for Apheresis (ASFA) Journal of Clinical Apheresis (JCA) Special Issue Writing Committee is charged with reviewing, updating and categorizing indications for the evidence-based use of therapeutic apheresis (TA) in human disease. Since the 2007 JCA Special Issue (Fourth Edition), the committee has incorporated systematic review and evidence-based approaches in the grading and categorization of apheresis indications. This Eighth Edition of the JCA Special Issue continues to maintain this methodology and rigor in order to make recommendations on the use of apheresis in a wide variety of diseases/conditions. The JCA Eighth Edition, like its predecessor, continues to apply the category and grading system definitions in fact sheets. The general layout and concept of a fact sheet that was introduced in the Fourth Edition, has largely been maintained in this edition. Each fact sheet succinctly summarizes the evidence for the use of TA in a specific disease entity or medical condition. The Eighth Edition comprises 84 fact sheets for relevant diseases and medical conditions, with 157 graded and categorized indications and/or TA modalities. The Eighth Edition of the JCA Special Issue seeks to continue to serve as a key resource that guides the utilization of TA in the treatment of human disease.

Therapeutic Apheresis in Acute Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis: Current Evidence and Unmet Needs-A Systematic Review

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is the most abundant inflammatory demyelinating disorder of the central nervous system. Despite recent advances in its long-term immunomodulatory treatment, MS patients still suffer from relapses, significantly contributing to disability accrual. In recent years, apheresis procedures such as therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) and immunoadsorption (IA) have been recognized as two options for treating MS relapses, that do not respond to standard treatment with corticosteroids. TPE is already incorporated in most international guidelines, although evidence for its use resulted mostly from either case series or small unblinded and/or non-randomized trials. Data on IA are still sparse, but several studies indicate comparable efficacy between both apheresis procedures. This article gives an overview of the published evidence on TPE and IA in the treatment of acute relapses in MS. Further, we outline current evidence regarding individual outcome predictors, describe technical details of apheresis procedures, and discuss apheresis treatment in children and during pregnancy.

Differences in the Reponses to Apheresis Therapy of Patients With 3 Histopathologically Classified Immunopathological Patterns of Multiple Sclerosis

Importance

Plasma exchange and immunoadsorption are second-line apheresis therapies for patients experiencing multiple sclerosis relapses. Early active multiple sclerosis lesions can be classified into different histopathological patterns of demyelination. Pattern 1 and 2 lesions show T-cell- and macrophage-associated demyelination, and pattern 2 is selectively associated with immunoglobulin and complement deposits, suggesting a humoral immune response. Pattern 3 lesions show signs of oligodendrocyte degeneration. Thus it is possible that pathogenic heterogeneity might predict therapy response.

Objective

To evaluate the apheresis response in relation to histopathologically defined immunopathological patterns of multiple sclerosis.

Design, Setting and Participants

This single-center cohort study recruited 69 patients nationwide between 2005 and 2016. All included patients had a diagnosis of early active inflammatory demyelination consistent with multiple sclerosis; were classified into patterns 1, 2, or 3 based on brain biopsy analysis; and underwent apheresis treatments. Patients who had concomitant severe disease, neuromyelitis optica, or acute disseminated encephalomyelitis were excluded.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary therapy outcome was a functionally relevant improvement of the relapse-related neurological deficit. Radiological and Expanded Disability Status Scale changes were secondary outcome parameters.

Results

The mean (SD) age of patients was 36.6 (13.3) years; 46 of the 69 participants (67%) were female. Overall, 16 patients (23%) exhibited pattern 1 lesions, 40 (58%) had pattern 2 lesions, and 13 (19%) had pattern 3 lesions. A functional therapy response was observed in 5 of the 16 patients with pattern 1 disease (31%) and 22 of the 40 patients with pattern 2 disease (55%), but none of the 13 patients with pattern 3 disease exhibited improvement (pattern 2 vs 3 P < .001). Radiological improvements were found in 4 (25%), 22 (56%), and 1 (11%) of patients with patterns 1, 2, and 3, respectively. The respective rates of response measured by changes in Expanded Disability Status Scale scores were 25%, 40%, and 0%. Brainstem involvement was a negative predictive factor for the functional therapy response (logarithmic odds ratio [logOR], -1.43; 95% CI, -3.21 to 0.17; P = .03), while immunoadsorption (as compared with plasma exchange) might be a positive predictive factor (logOR, 3.26; 95% CI, 0.75 to 8.13; P = .01).

Conclusions and Relevance

This cohort study provides evidence that the response to apheresis treatment is associated with immunopathological patterns. Patients with both patterns 1 and 2 improved clinically after apheresis treatment, but pattern 2 patients who showed signs of a humoral immune response benefited most. Apheresis appears unlikely to benefit patients with pattern 3 lesions.

CSF macrophage migration inhibitory factor levels did not predict steroid treatment response after optic neuritis in patients with multiple sclerosis

Glucocorticoid (GC) refractory relapses in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) or clinically isolated syndrome (CIS), who are in potential need of treatment escalation, are a key challenge in routine clinical practice. The pro-inflammatory cytokine macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF) has been shown to be an endogenous counter-regulator of GC, and potentiates autoimmune-mediated neuroinflammation. In order to evaluate whether MIF levels are elevated in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) of MS patients (CSF-MIF), and whether they are higher still during a GC refractory relapse, we compared CSF-MIF concentrations of CIS/MS patients with acute optic neuritis as their first inflammatory episode (ON, n = 20), CIS/MS patients with a stable disease progression/without relapse (CIS/MS w/o, n = 18), and healthy controls (HC, n = 20) using ANOVA. Mean CSF-MIF concentrations in CIS/MS w/o patients were significantly higher than in ON patients and HCs, whereas ON patients and HCs did not differ. A subgroup analysis of the ON group revealed 10 patients to be responsive to GC-treatment (GC-ON) and 10 patients refractory under GC-treatment (rGC-ON). However, mean CSF-MIF concentrations did not differ between GC-ON and rGC-ON cases. We therefore conclude that MIF is not suitable for distinguishing GC responders from non-responders in a group of patients with acute optic neuritis, but it rather mirrors the ongoing inflammation in long-term MS disease progression.

Tryptophan immunoadsorption during pregnancy and breastfeeding in patients with acute relapse of multiple sclerosis and neuromyelitis optica

BACKGROUND

Up to every fourth woman with multiple sclerosis (MS) or neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) suffers a clinically relevant relapse during pregnancy. High doses of steroids bear some serious risks, especially within the first trimester of pregnancy. Immunoadsorption (IA) is an effective and more selective treatment option in disabling MS relapse than plasma exchange. Data on the use of IA during pregnancy and breastfeeding are scarce.

METHODS

In this retrospective multicenter study, we analyzed the safety and efficacy of IA treatment in acute relapses during pregnancy or breastfeeding. The primary outcome parameter - change of acute relapse-related disability after IA - was assessed using Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) and visual acuity (VA) measurements for patients with optic neuritis (ON).

RESULTS

A total of 24 patients were analyzed, 23 with relapsing-remitting MS, and 1 with NMOSD. Twenty patients were treated with IA during pregnancy. Four patients received IA postnatally during the breastfeeding period. Treatment was started at a mean 22.5 [standard deviation (SD) 13.9] days after onset of relapse. Patients were treated with a series of 5.8 (mean, SD 0.7) IA treatments within 7-10 days. Sixteen patients received IA because of steroid-refractory relapse, eight were treated without preceding steroid pulse therapy. EDSS improved clinically relevant from 3.5 [median, interquartile range (IQR) 2] before IA to 2.5 (median, IQR 1.1) after IA, p < 0.001. In patients with ON, VA improved in four out of five patients. Altogether, in 83% of patients, a rapid and marked improvement of relapse-related symptoms was observed after IA with either a decrease of ⩾1 EDSS grade or improvement in VA ⩾20%. No clinically relevant side effect was reported in 138 IA treatments.

CONCLUSIONS

Tryptophan-IA was found to be effective and well tolerated in MS/NMOSD relapses, both as an escalation option after insufficient response to steroid pulse therapy and as first-line relapse treatment during pregnancy and breastfeeding.

Multiple sclerosis

Multiple sclerosis continues to be a challenging and disabling condition but there is now greater understanding of the underlying genetic and environmental factors that drive the condition, including low vitamin D levels, cigarette smoking, and obesity. Early and accurate diagnosis is crucial and is supported by diagnostic criteria, incorporating imaging and spinal fluid abnormalities for those presenting with a clinically isolated syndrome. Importantly, there is an extensive therapeutic armamentarium, both oral and by infusion, for those with the relapsing remitting form of the disease. Careful consideration is required when choosing the correct treatment, balancing the side-effect profile with efficacy and escalating as clinically appropriate. This move towards more personalised medicine is supported by a clinical guideline published in 2018. Finally, a comprehensive management programme is strongly recommended for all patients with multiple sclerosis, enhancing health-related quality of life through advocating wellness, addressing aggravating factors, and managing comorbidities. The greatest remaining challenge for multiple sclerosis is the development of treatments incorporating neuroprotection and remyelination to treat and ultimately prevent the disabling, progressive forms of the condition.

Second regional plasmapheresis conference and workshop for Southeast Asia (SEA) on the immunomodulatory role of plasma exchange in central and peripheral nervous system disorders, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 9th December 2017

In December 2017, 79 delegates attended the 2nd regional plasmapheresis conference and workshop for Southeast Asia (SEA) on the immunomodulatory role of plasma exchange in central and peripheral nervous system disorders in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. This meeting featured 6 plenary lectures, interactive sessions dedicated for experience sharing, case presentations, and a practical session for paramedics. Clinical experts and researchers from 7 SEA countries and India shared experience and challenges in treating autoimmune neurological disorders. While the spectrum of diseases and neurology practice remained largely similar, there was great disparities in accessibility of therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) within SEA countries and between urban or rural settings. Costs, human resources, and healthcare policies are common challenges in providing sustainable TPE services. Novel techniques and innovative ideas in performing TPE were explored. A working consortium comprising of key opinion leaders was proposed to improve standards of TPE and enhance future research.

Deciphering the Role of B Cells in Multiple Sclerosis-Towards Specific Targeting of Pathogenic Function

B cells, plasma cells and antibodies may play a key role in the pathogenesis of multiple sclerosis (MS). This notion is supported by various immunological changes observed in MS patients, such as activation and pro-inflammatory differentiation of peripheral blood B cells, the persistence of clonally expanded plasma cells producing immunoglobulins in the cerebrospinal fluid, as well as the composition of inflammatory central nervous system lesions frequently containing co-localizing antibody depositions and activated complement. In recent years, the perception of a respective pathophysiological B cell involvement was vividly promoted by the empirical success of anti-CD20-mediated B cell depletion in clinical trials; based on these findings, the first monoclonal anti-CD20 antibody—ocrelizumab—is currently in the process of being approved for treatment of MS. In this review, we summarize the current knowledge on the role of B cells, plasma cells and antibodies in MS and elucidate how approved and future treatments, first and foremost anti-CD20 antibodies, therapeutically modify these B cell components. We will furthermore describe regulatory functions of B cells in MS and discuss how the evolving knowledge of these therapeutically desirable B cell properties can be harnessed to improve future safety and efficacy of B cell-directed therapy in MS.

Treatment of the First Acute Relapse Following Therapeutic Plasma Exchange in Formerly Glucocorticosteroid-Unresponsive Multiple Sclerosis Patients-A Multicenter Study to Evaluate Glucocorticosteroid Responsiveness

Therapeutic options to treat multiple sclerosis (MS) relapses comprise glucocorticosteroids (GCS) as first-line and therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) as second-line treatments in GCS-unresponsive patients. No guidelines exist for the treatment of another relapse following TPE. We retrospectively analyzed the responsiveness to GCS in a subsequent relapse following TPE in previously GCS-unresponsive MS patients. Thirty-seven patients with GCS-unresponsive MS relapses received TPE (relapse A). All patients developed another relapse after the completion of TPE and received GCS again (relapse B). The primary study endpoint was the clinical response to GCS and TPE. Marked improvement was defined as clinically significant improvement in function, moderate improvement as a definite change of symptoms without significant impact on function, no effect comprised unchanged symptoms, and deterioration a worsening of symptoms or new deficits. The secondary endpoint was an improvement in expanded disability status scale (EDSS) scoring. All patients were GCS-unresponsive during relapse A and received TPE. During GCS treatment of relapse B, marked improvement was observed in 10, moderate improvement in 24, and no effect in three patients. The EDSS decreased in 15 patients. GCS might remain the first-line relapse treatment following TPE in formerly GCS-unresponsive MS patients.

Outcome of MS relapses in the era of disease-modifying therapy

Background

In multiple sclerosis (MS), neurological disability results from incomplete remission of relapses and from relapse-independent progression. Intravenous high dose methylprednisolone (IVMP) is the established standard treatment to accelerate clinical relapse remission, although some patients do not respond. Most studies of relapse treatment have been performed when few patients received disease-modifying treatment and may no longer apply today.

Methods

We prospectively assessed, over one year, the course of patients who presented with a clinically isolated syndrome (CIS) or MS relapse, documenting demographic, clinical, treatment and outcome data. A standardized follow-up examination was performed 10–14 days after end of relapse treatment.

Results

We documented 119 relapses in 108 patients (31 CIS, 77 MS). 114 relapses were treated with IVMP resulting in full remission (29.2%), partial remission (38.7%), no change (18.2%) or worsening (4.4%). In 27 relapses (22.7%), escalating relapse treatment was indicated, and performed in 24, using double-dose IVMP (n = 18), plasmapheresis (n = 2) or immunoadsorption (n = 4).

Conclusions

Standardised follow-up visits and outcome documentation in treated relapses led to escalating relapse treatment in every fifth relapse. We recommend incorporating scheduled follow-up visits into routine relapse management. Our data facilitate the design of prospective trials addressing methods and timelines of relapse treatment.

Pathophysiological changes of inflammatory syndrome in multiple sclerosis after instituting therapeutic plasmapheresis

In autoimmune conditions affecting the central and peripheral CNS as well as in multiple sclerosis (MS), the inflammatory syndrome is present with the onset of this disease. The present paper aimed to highlight the inflammatory syndrome based on the leukergia test, the total blood viscosity test, blood filterability test as well as on other tests. The early instituting of the therapeutic plasmapheresis beneficially modified the clinical status, the biological and pathophysiological behavior of the patient's illness. Objective of the paper: The aim was to highlight the importance, advantages, and pathophysiological changes after therapeutic plasmapheresis in five cases, in patients hospitalized with the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis. Material and method: In order to emphasize the inflammatory syndrome, the determination of leukergia assay, the total blood viscosity test and the blood filterability test were added to regular examinations, conducted on the batch of patients included in the study. Results and discussions: As a result of using therapeutic plasmapheresis, the inflammatory parameters in patients with multiple sclerosis improved beneficially as it was proven by the values of inflammatory tests before and after plasmapheresis. Conclusions: In the treatment of multiple sclerosis, plasmapheresis proved to be a medical method that significantly reduced autoimmune inflammatory "installed" syndrome.

B Cell-Directed Therapeutics in Multiple Sclerosis: Rationale and Clinical Evidence

Over the last decade, evidence condensed that B cells, B cell-derived plasma cells and antibodies play a key role in the pathogenesis and progression of multiple sclerosis (MS). In many patients with MS, peripheral B cells show signs of chronic activation; within the cerebrospinal fluid clonally expanded plasma cells produce oligoclonal immunoglobulins, which remain a hallmark diagnostic finding. Confirming the clinical relevance of these immunological alterations, recent trials testing anti-CD20-mediated depletion of peripheral B cells showed an instantaneous halt in development of new central nervous system lesions and occurrence of relapses. Notwithstanding this enormous success, not all B cells or B cell subsets may contribute in a pathogenic manner, and may, in contrast, exert anti-inflammatory and, thus, therapeutically desirable properties in MS. Naïve B cells, in MS patients similar to healthy controls, are a relevant source of regulatory cytokines such as interleukin-10, which dampens the activity of other immune cells and promotes recovery from acute disease flares in experimental MS models. In this review, we describe in detail pathogenic but also regulatory properties of B and plasma cells in the context of MS and its animal model experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. In the second part, we review what impact current and future therapies may have on these B cell properties. Within this section, we focus on the highly encouraging data on anti-CD20 antibodies as future therapy for MS. Lastly, we discuss how B cell-directed therapy in MS could be possibly advanced even further in regard to efficacy and safety by integrating the emerging information on B cell regulation in MS into future therapeutic strategies.

Disease-modifying therapies and infectious risks in multiple sclerosis

Immunomodulatory and immunosuppressive treatments for multiple sclerosis (MS) are associated with an increased risk of infection, which makes treatment of this condition challenging in daily clinical practice. Use of the expanding range of available drugs to treat MS requires extensive knowledge of treatment-associated infections, risk-minimizing strategies and approaches to monitoring and treatment of such adverse events. An interdisciplinary approach to evaluate the infectious events associated with available MS treatments has become increasingly relevant. In addition, individual stratification of treatment-related infectious risks is necessary when choosing therapies for patients with MS, as well as during and after therapy. Determination of the individual risk of infection following serial administration of different immunotherapies is also crucial. Here, we review the modes of action of the available MS drugs, and relate this information to the current knowledge of drug-specific infectious risks and risk-minimizing strategies.