Activation of Six1 Expression in Vertebrate Sensory Neurons

CAbiNet: joint clustering and visualization of cells and genes for single-cell transcriptomics

A fundamental analysis task for single-cell transcriptomics data is clustering with subsequent visualization of cell clusters. The genes responsible for the clustering are only inferred in a subsequent step. Clustering cells and genes together would be the remit of biclustering algorithms, which are often bogged down by the size of single-cell data. Here we present 'Correspondence Analysis based Biclustering on Networks' (CAbiNet) for joint clustering and visualization of single-cell RNA-sequencing data. CAbiNet performs efficient co-clustering of cells and their respective marker genes and jointly visualizes the biclusters in a non-linear embedding for easy and interactive visual exploration of the data.

Identification and Functional Study of Enhancers of EYA1: The Causative Gene of Branchio-Oto-Renal Syndrome

INTRODUCTION

Branchio-oto-renal syndrome (BOR syndrome) is a rare genetic disorder with an incidence of 1 in 40,000, affecting the development of multiple organs, including the branchio, ear, and kidney. It is responsible for 2% of childhood deafness. Currently, variants in the coding regions of the main causative genes, such as EYA1, SIX1, and SIX5, explain only half of the disease's etiology. Therefore, there is a need to explore the non-coding regions, which constitute the majority of the genome, especially the regulatory regions, as potential new causative factors.

METHOD

In this study, we focused on the EYA1 gene, which accounts for over 40% of BOR syndrome cases, and conducted a screening of candidate enhancers within a 250-kb region upstream and downstream of the gene using comparative genomics. We characterized the enhancer activities of these candidates in zebrafish using the Tol2 transposon system.

RESULTS

Our findings revealed that out of the 11 conserved non-coding elements (CNEs) examined, four exhibited enhancer activity. Notably, CNE16.39 and CNE16.45 displayed tissue-specific enhancer activity in the ear. CNE16.39 required the full-length 206 bp sequence for inner-ear-specific expression, while the core functional region of CNE16.45 was identified as 136 bp. Confocal microscopy results demonstrated that both CNE16.39 and CNE16.45 drove the expression of GFP in the sensory region of the crista of the inner ear in zebrafish, consistent with the expression pattern of eya1.

CONCLUSION

This study contributes to the understanding of the regulatory network governing EYA1 expression and offers new insights to further clarify the pathogenic role of EYA1 in BOR syndrome.

Identity, lineage and fates of a temporally distinct progenitor population in the embryonic olfactory epithelium

We defined a temporally and transcriptionally divergent precursor cohort in the medial olfactory epithelium (OE) shortly after it differentiates as a distinct tissue at mid-gestation in the mouse. This temporally distinct population of Ascl1+ cells in the dorsomedial OE is segregated from Meis1+/Pax7+ progenitors in the lateral OE, and does not appear to be generated by Pax7+ lateral OE precursors. The medial Ascl1+ precursors do not yield a substantial number of early-generated ORNs. Instead, they first generate additional proliferative precursors as well as a distinct population of frontonasal mesenchymal cells associated with the migratory mass that surrounds the nascent olfactory nerve. Parallel to these in vivo distinctions, isolated medial versus lateral OE precursors in vitro retain distinct proliferative capacities and modes of division that reflect their in vivo identities. At later fetal stages, these early dorsomedial Ascl1+ precursors cells generate spatially restricted subsets of ORNs as well as other non-neuronal cell classes. Accordingly, the initial compliment of ORNs and other OE cell types is derived from at least two distinct early precursor populations: lateral Meis1/Pax7+ precursors that generate primarily early ORNs, and a temporally, spatially, and transcriptionally distinct subset of medial Ascl1+ precursors that initially generate additional OE progenitors and apparent migratory mass cells before yielding a subset of ORNs and likely supporting cell classes.

The SIX Family of Transcription Factors: Common Themes Integrating Developmental and Cancer Biology

The sine oculis (SIX) family of transcription factors are key regulators of developmental processes during embryogenesis. Members of this family control gene expression to promote self-renewal of progenitor cell populations and govern mechanisms of cell differentiation. When the function of SIX genes becomes disrupted, distinct congenital defects develops both in animal models and humans. In addition to the embryonic setting, members of the SIX family have been found to be critical regulators of tumorigenesis, promoting cell proliferation, epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition, and metastasis. Research in both the fields of developmental biology and cancer research have provided an extensive understanding of SIX family transcription factor functions. Here we review recent progress in elucidating the role of SIX family genes in congenital disease as well as in the promotion of cancer. Common themes arise when comparing SIX transcription factor function during embryonic and cancer development. We highlight the complementary nature of these two fields and how knowledge in one area can open new aspects of experimentation in the other.

Cell fate decisions during the development of the peripheral nervous system in the vertebrate head

Sensory placodes and neural crest cells are among the key cell populations that facilitated the emergence and diversification of vertebrates throughout evolution. Together, they generate the sensory nervous system in the head: both form the cranial sensory ganglia, while placodal cells make major contributions to the sense organs-the eye, ear and olfactory epithelium. Both are instrumental for integrating craniofacial organs and have been key to drive the concentration of sensory structures in the vertebrate head allowing the emergence of active and predatory life forms. Whereas the gene regulatory networks that control neural crest cell development have been studied extensively, the signals and downstream transcriptional events that regulate placode formation and diversity are only beginning to be uncovered. Both cell populations are derived from the embryonic ectoderm, which also generates the central nervous system and the epidermis, and recent evidence suggests that their initial specification involves a common molecular mechanism before definitive neural, neural crest and placodal lineages are established. In this review, we will first discuss the transcriptional networks that pattern the embryonic ectoderm and establish these three cell fates with emphasis on sensory placodes. Second, we will focus on how sensory placode precursors diversify using the specification of otic-epibranchial progenitors and their segregation as an example.

Regulation of continuous but complex expression pattern of Six1 during early sensory development

BACKGROUND

In vertebrates, cranial sensory placodes give rise to neurosensory and endocrine structures, such as the olfactory epithelium, inner ear, and anterior pituitary. We report here the establishment of a transgenic mouse line that expresses Cre recombinase under the control of Six1-21, a major placodal enhancer of the homeobox gene Six1.

RESULTS

In the new Cre-expressing line, mSix1-21-NLSCre, the earliest Cre-mediated recombination was induced at embryonic day 8.5 in the region overlapping with the otic-epibranchial progenitor domain (OEPD), a transient, common precursor domain for the otic and epibranchial placodes. Recombination was later observed in the OEPD-derived structures (the entire inner ear and the VIIth-Xth cranial sensory ganglia), olfactory epithelium, anterior pituitary, pharyngeal ectoderm and pouches. Other Six1-positive structures, such as salivary/lacrimal glands and limb buds, were also positive for recombination. Moreover, comparison with another mouse line expressing Cre under the control of the sensory neuron enhancer, Six1-8, indicated that the continuous and complex expression pattern of Six1 during sensory organ formation is pieced together by separate enhancers.

CONCLUSIONS

mSix1-21-NLSCre has several unique characteristics to make it suitable for analysis of cell lineage and gene function in sensory placodes as well as nonplacodal Six1-positive structures. Developmental Dynamics 247:250-261, 2018. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.