Is Long-Term Low-Dose Aspirin Therapy Associated with Renal Dysfunction in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes? JPAD2 Cohort Study

NSAIDs, analgesics, antiplatelet drugs, and decline in renal function: a retrospective case-control study with SIDIAP database

INTRODUCTION

We aim to explore the association between NSAIDs consumption, Symptomatic Slow Action Drugs for Osteoarthritis (SYSADOA), analgesics, and antiplatelet drugs, and decline in renal function by estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR).

METHODS

We performed a case-control study using the SIDIAP database in Catalonia. We considered defined cases, patients with an eGFR value ≤ 45 ml/min/1.73 m2 in the period 2010-2015 with a previous eGFR value ≥ 60, and no eGFR ≥ 60 after this period. Controls had an eGFR ≥ 60 with no previous eGFR < 60. Five controls were selected for each case, matched by sex, age, index date, Diabetes Mellitus and Hypertension. We estimated Odds Ratios (OR, 95% Confidence Intervals) of decline in renal function for drugs group adjusting with logistic regression models, by consumption measured in DDD. There were n = 18,905 cases and n = 94,456 controls. The mean age was 77 years, 59% were women. The multivariate adjusted model showed a low risk for eGFR decline for NSAIDs (0.92;0.88-0.97), SYSADOA (0.87;0.83-0.91) and acetaminophen (0.84;0.79-0.89), and an high risk for metamizole (1.07;1.03-1.12), and antiplatelet drugs (1.07;1.03-1.11). The low risk in NSAIDs was limited to propionic acid derivatives (0.92;0.88-0.96), whereas an high risk was observed for high doses in both acetic acid derivatives (1.09;1.03-1.15) and Coxibs (1.19;1.08-1.30). Medium and high use of major opioids shows a high risk (1.15;1.03-1.29). Triflusal showed high risk at medium (1.23;1.02-1.48) and high use (1.68;1.40-2.01).

CONCLUSION

We observed a decline in renal function associated with metamizole and antiplatelet agent, especially triflusal, and with high use of acetic acid derivates, Coxibs, and major opioids. Further studies are necessary to confirm these results.

Antiplatelet agents for chronic kidney disease

BACKGROUND

Antiplatelet agents are widely used to prevent cardiovascular events. The risks and benefits of antiplatelet agents may be different in people with chronic kidney disease (CKD) for whom occlusive atherosclerotic events are less prevalent, and bleeding hazards might be increased. This is an update of a review first published in 2013.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the benefits and harms of antiplatelet agents in people with any form of CKD, including those with CKD not receiving renal replacement therapy, patients receiving any form of dialysis, and kidney transplant recipients.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Kidney and Transplant Register of Studies up to 13 July 2021 through contact with the Information Specialist using search terms relevant to this review. Studies in the Register are identified through searches of CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and EMBASE, conference proceedings, the International Clinical Trials Register (ICTRP) Search Portal and ClinicalTrials.gov.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We selected randomised controlled trials of any antiplatelet agents versus placebo or no treatment, or direct head-to-head antiplatelet agent studies in people with CKD. Studies were included if they enrolled participants with CKD, or included people in broader at-risk populations in which data for subgroups with CKD could be disaggregated.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Four authors independently extracted data from primary study reports and any available supplementary information for study population, interventions, outcomes, and risks of bias. Risk ratios (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated from numbers of events and numbers of participants at risk which were extracted from each included study. The reported RRs were extracted where crude event rates were not provided. Data were pooled using the random-effects model. Confidence in the evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 113 studies, enrolling 51,959 participants; 90 studies (40,597 CKD participants) compared an antiplatelet agent with placebo or no treatment, and 29 studies (11,805 CKD participants) directly compared one antiplatelet agent with another. Fifty-six new studies were added to this 2021 update. Seven studies originally excluded from the 2013 review were included, although they had a follow-up lower than two months. Random sequence generation and allocation concealment were at low risk of bias in 16 and 22 studies, respectively. Sixty-four studies reported low-risk methods for blinding of participants and investigators; outcome assessment was blinded in 41 studies. Forty-one studies were at low risk of attrition bias, 50 studies were at low risk of selective reporting bias, and 57 studies were at low risk of other potential sources of bias. Compared to placebo or no treatment, antiplatelet agents probably reduces myocardial infarction (18 studies, 15,289 participants: RR 0.88, 95% CI 0.79 to 0.99, I² = 0%; moderate certainty). Antiplatelet agents has uncertain effects on fatal or nonfatal stroke (12 studies, 10.382 participants: RR 1.01, 95% CI 0.64 to 1.59, I² = 37%; very low certainty) and may have little or no effect on death from any cause (35 studies, 18,241 participants: RR 0.94, 95 % CI 0.84 to 1.06, I² = 14%; low certainty). Antiplatelet therapy probably increases major bleeding in people with CKD and those treated with haemodialysis (HD) (29 studies, 16,194 participants: RR 1.35, 95% CI 1.10 to 1.65, I² = 12%; moderate certainty). In addition, antiplatelet therapy may increase minor bleeding in people with CKD and those treated with HD (21 studies, 13,218 participants: RR 1.55, 95% CI 1.27 to 1.90, I² = 58%; low certainty). Antiplatelet treatment may reduce early dialysis vascular access thrombosis (8 studies, 1525 participants) RR 0.52, 95% CI 0.38 to 0.70; low certainty). Antiplatelet agents may reduce doubling of serum creatinine in CKD (3 studies, 217 participants: RR 0.39, 95% CI 0.17 to 0.86, I² = 8%; low certainty). The treatment effects of antiplatelet agents on stroke, cardiovascular death, kidney failure, kidney transplant graft loss, transplant rejection, creatinine clearance, proteinuria, dialysis access failure, loss of primary unassisted patency, failure to attain suitability for dialysis, need of intervention and cardiovascular hospitalisation were uncertain. Limited data were available for direct head-to-head comparisons of antiplatelet drugs, including prasugrel, ticagrelor, different doses of clopidogrel, abciximab, defibrotide, sarpogrelate and beraprost.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Antiplatelet agents probably reduced myocardial infarction and increased major bleeding, but do not appear to reduce all-cause and cardiovascular death among people with CKD and those treated with dialysis. The treatment effects of antiplatelet agents compared with each other are uncertain.

Analgesic use and the risk of renal cell carcinoma - Findings from the Consortium for the Investigation of Renal Malignancies (CONFIRM) study

PURPOSE

The incidence of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is rising. Use of analgesics such as non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and paracetamol may affect renal function. The aim of this study was to assess associations between analgesic use and risk of RCC.

METHODS

A population-based case-control family design was used. Cases were recruited via two Australian state cancer registries. Controls were siblings or partners of cases. Analgesic use was captured by self-completed questionnaire. Logistic regression was used to estimate odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for RCC risk associated with regular analgesic use (at least 5 times per month for 6 months or more) and duration and frequency of use.

RESULTS

The analysis included 1064 cases and 724 controls. Regular use of paracetamol was associated with an increased risk of RCC (OR 1.41, 95%CI 1.13-1.77). Regular use of NSAIDs was associated with increased risk of RCC for women (OR 1.71, 95% CI 1.23-2.39) but not men (OR 0.83, 95% CI 0.58-1.18; p-interaction=0.003). There was no evidence of a dose-response for duration of use of paracetamol (linear trend p = 0.77) and weak evidence for non- aspirin NSAID use by women (linear trend p = 0.054).

CONCLUSION

This study found that regular use of paracetamol was associated with increased risk of RCC. NSAID use was associated with increased risk only for women.

Discharge Prescription Patterns for Antiplatelet Therapy Following Lower Extremity Peripheral Vascular Intervention

BACKGROUND

Despite current guidelines suggesting a benefit for dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) following peripheral vascular intervention (PVI), there are limited data on antiplatelet prescribing patterns post-procedure. We attempted to determine variables associated with DAPT prescription following lower extremity PVI.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of patients undergoing lower extremity PVI in the Vascular Quality Initiative (2017-2018) was performed. Participants not on anticoagulation or DAPT before the procedure were considered for the final analysis. Postdischarge antiplatelet therapy regimen rates were determined (none, aspirin only, P2Y12 inhibitor only, and DAPT). Multivariate logistic regression was performed to determine variables associated with DAPT initiation compared with those discharged on single-agent or no antiplatelet therapy.

RESULTS

A total of 16 597 procedures were included for analysis, with 49% initiated on DAPT post-PVI. Male sex (odds ratio [OR], 1.12 [95% CI, 1.05-1.20]), smoking (OR, 1.20 [95% CI, 1.09-1.32]), and coronary artery disease (OR, 1.19 [95% CI, 1.11-1.27]) were associated with an increased likelihood of post-PVI DAPT prescription. Procedures requiring multiple types of interventions (OR, 1.28 [95% CI, 1.15-1.42]), stent placement (OR, 1.16 [95% CI, 1.06-1.27]), and with complications (OR, 1.31 [95% CI, 1.14-1.52]) were also positively associated with DAPT prescription.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients not already receiving anticoagulation or on DAPT at the time of lower extremity PVI, prescription of DAPT following intervention is ≈50%. Multiple factors were associated with the decision for DAPT versus single antiplatelet therapy, and further study is required to understand how this affects postintervention adverse limb and cardiovascular events.

[Primary prevention of chronic non-communicable diseases and acetylsalicylic acid: ambiguity of opinions]

Chronic noninfectious diseases (cardiovascular, bronchopulmonary, oncological diseases and diabetes mellitus) are presently the most common cause of death worldwide, with cardiovascular diseases (CVD) being predominant. For this reason, the key goal of a physician is not only to treat but also to prevent diseases. Acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) is considered one of the most effective drugs for secondary prevention of CVD. However, the use of ASA for primary prevention is still debated. Results of many studies of ASA are inconsistent. Some studies have suggested that using ASA in patients aged 40-70 with a high 10-year risk of CVD and a low risk of bleeding may reduce the incidence of CVD. Administration of ASA to patients with a high or medium risk of CVD is also considered.

Combination therapy with beraprost sodium and aspirin for acute ischemic stroke: a single-center retrospective study

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of the combination of beraprost sodium (BPS) and aspirin in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS).

METHODS

There were 384 patients with AIS enrolled in this single-center, retrospective study. The BPS group comprised patients who received combination therapy with BPS and aspirin, and the control group comprised those who received only aspirin. Primary measurements were glomerular filtration rate (GFR), cystatin-c (Cys-C), National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score, modified activities of daily living index (MBI), modified Rankin scale (mRS), and blood coagulation indexes. Recurrence and adverse events were recorded.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in patient characteristics at baseline between the two groups. GFR and Cys-C levels increased in the BPS group compared with the control group. After treatment, the NIHSS and mRS score were significantly lower in the BPS group compared with the control group, whereas the MBI scores were significantly higher in the BPS group compared with the control group. There was no significant difference in blood coagulation between the two groups. There were no serious adverse events in either group.

CONCLUSIONS

Combination therapy with BPS and aspirin may be a safe and effective treatment for AIS.

Pros and Cons of Aspirin Prophylaxis for Prevention of Cardiovascular Events in Kidney Transplantation and Review of Evidence

Kidney transplant recipients have traditional and nontraditional risk factors which can lead to coronary artery disease and sudden death with a functional graft loss. Aspirin has been used traditionally for prevention of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular accidents. It has beneficial effects in secondary prevention of cardiovascular events in general population. Its use for primary prophylaxis is still disputed. Bleeding and theoretical risk of nephrotoxicity are the major concerns about its use. The data on aspirin in kidney transplant population is sparse. This review will focus on various pros and cons of aspirin use for prevention of cardiovascular events in kidney transplant recipients and a way forward.

Exposure to vitamin k antagonists and kidney function decline in patients with atrial fibrillation and chronic kidney disease

BACKGROUND

Exposure to vitamin K antagonists (VKA) has been suggested to accelerate progression of chronic kidney disease (CKD) but robust clinical data are currently lacking.

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated the impact of VKA exposure on kidney function in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and CKD stage 3/4. Patients were prospectively followed within a primary care electronic database (median follow-up of 1.45 years). The kidney function trajectory over time, defined as the annualized change in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), was analyzed with linear mixed-effects regression including propensity score adjustment.

RESULTS

14 432 patients (median age 78 years, median CHA 2 DS 2-VASc score 4 points) contributed 97 792 eGFR measurements (mean 6.8 measurements/patient; range: 1-197). Mean baseline eGFR was 50.3 mL/min/1.73 m2; and declined by 1.10 mL/min/1.73 m2/year (95% CI: 0.91-1.28, P < 0.0001). In 7409 patients with VKA exposure, CKD progression was significantly faster compared to patients without VKA exposure (5-year absolute eGFR loss from baseline: 6.0 mL/min/1.73 m2 vs 4.5 mL/min/1.73 m2, for an absolute 5-year excess eGFR decline with VKA exposure of 1.5 mL/min/1.73 m2 (95% CI: 0.4-2.7, P = 0.002). These results prevailed upon adjusting for CHA 2 DS 2-VASc score and other potential imbalances in prognostic variables, and in several sensitivity analyses. In the group without documented VKA exposure, 1775 VKA patients (24%) and 1012 patients (14%) developed a 30% decline in eGFR during follow-up (P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with AF and CKD, VKA use is associated with accelerated eGFR decline. Within the limitations of a retrospective analysis, this finding supports the "VKA-renal-calcification hypothesis." However, although statistically significant, the excess loss in eGFR over 5 years with VKA was modest.

Aspirin for Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease and Renal Disease Progression in Chronic Kidney Disease Patients: a Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial (AASER Study)

BACKGROUND

Patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) are at high risk for developing cardiovascular events. However, limited evidence is available regarding the use of aspirin in CKD patients to decrease cardiovascular risk and to slow renal disease progression.

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective, multicenter, open-label randomized controlled trial.

SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

One hundred eleven patients with estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) 15-60 ml/min/1.73 m² without previous cardiovascular events.

INTERVENTION

Aspirin treatment (100 mg/day) (n = 50) or usual therapy (n = 61). Mean follow-up time was 64.8 ± 16.4 months.

OUTCOMES

The primary endpoint was composed of cardiovascular death, acute coronary syndrome (nonfatal MI, coronary revascularization, or unstable angina pectoris), cerebrovascular disease, heart failure, or nonfatal peripheral arterial disease. Secondary endpoints were fatal and nonfatal coronary events, renal events (defined as doubling of serum creatinine, ≥ 50% decrease in eGFR, or renal replacement therapy), and bleeding episodes.

RESULTS

During follow-up, 17 and 5 participants suffered from a primary endpoint in the control and aspirin groups, respectively. Aspirin did not significantly reduce primary composite endpoint (HR, 0.396 (0.146-1.076), p = 0.069. Eight patients suffered from a fatal or nonfatal coronary event in the control group compared to no patients in the aspirin group. Aspirin significantly reduced the risk of coronary events (log-rank, 5.997; p = 0.014). Seventeen patients in the control group reached the renal outcome in comparison with 3 patients in the aspirin group. Aspirin treatment decreased renal disease progression in a model adjusted for age, baseline kidney function, and diabetes mellitus (HR, 0.272; 95% CI, 0.077-0.955; p = 0.043) but did not when adjusted for albuminuria. No differences were found in minor bleeding episodes between groups and no major bleeding was registered.

LIMITATIONS

Small sample size and open-label trial.

CONCLUSIONS

Long-term treatment with low-dose aspirin did not reduce the composite primary endpoint; however, there were reductions in secondary endpoints with fewer coronary events and renal outcomes. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01709994.

Effect of aspirin on renal disease progression in patients with type 2 diabetes: A multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized trial. The renaL disEase progression by aspirin in diabetic pAtients (LEDA) trial. Rationale and study design

Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is one of the most common causes of chronic kidney disease and kidney failure. It has been estimated that the annual decline of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) among patients with T2DM is approximately 2.0-2.5mL min^-1 y^-1. Cyclooxygenase-dependent eicosanoids, such as 11-dehydro-thromboxane (Tx)B₂, are increased in T2DM patients and are potentially involved in the regulation of renal blood flow. Animal models showed that cyclooxygenase inhibitors, such as aspirin, are associated with improvements in renal plasma flow and eGFR values.

HYPOTHESIS

The primary end point of the LEDA trial is to evaluate the 1-year decline of eGFR in T2DM patients treated or not with low-dose aspirin (100mg/d). Secondary end points will be the rapid decline in renal function, defined as a reduction of eGFR ≥5mL/min, and change of renal function class after 1-year follow-up. Furthermore, urinary excretion 11-dehydro-TxB₂ will be related to renal function modifications.

STUDY DESIGN

A phase 3 no-profit, multicenter, double-blind, randomized intervention trial of aspirin 100mg/dvs placebo (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02895113). All patients will be monitored at 6 and 12months after randomization to assess drug adherence and eGFR changes.

SUMMARY

The LEDA trial is the first double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial aimed at examining whether aspirin treatment may beneficially affect kidney function in patients with T2DM by reducing the annual eGFR decline. The trial will also examine whether the potential renoprotective effects of aspirin might be partly due to its inhibition of TxB₂ production.

Resveratrol Attenuates Microglial Activation via SIRT1-SOCS1 Pathway

Microglial activation is involved in a variety of neurological disorders, and overactivated microglial cells can secrete large amount of proinflammatory factors and induce neuron death. Therefore, reducing microglial activation is believed to be useful in treating the disorders. In this study, we used 10 ng/ml lipopolysaccharide plus 10 U/ml interferon γ (LPS/IFNγ) to induce N9 microglial activation and explored resveratrol- (RSV-) induced effects on microglial activation and the underlying mechanism. We found that LPS/IFNγ exposure for 24 h increased inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) and nuclear factor κB (NF-κB) p65 subunit expressions in the cells and enhanced tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α) and interleukin 1β (IL-1β) releases from the cells. RSV of 25 μM reduced the iNOS and NF-κB p65 subunit expressions and the proinflammatory factors' releases; the knockdown of silent information regulator factor 2-related enzyme 1 (SIRT1) or suppressor of cytokine signaling 1 (SOCS1) by using the small interfering RNA, however, significantly abolished the RSV-induced effects on iNOS and NF-κB p65 subunit expressions and the proinflammatory factors' releases. These findings showed that microglial SIRT1-SOCS1 pathway may mediate the RSV-induced inhibition of microglial activation in the LPS/IFNγ-treated N9 microglia.

Common Analgesic Agents and Their Roles in Analgesic Nephropathy: A Commentary on the Evidence

An association between non-opioid analgesic agents and chronic kidney disease has long been suspected. The presumed development of chronic renal impairment following protracted and excessive use of non-opioid analgesia is known as analgesic nephropathy. Many clinicians accept analgesic nephropathy as a real entity despite the paucity of scientific evidence. This narrative review aims to summarize the literature in the field. The weight of available observational literature suggests that long-term ingestion of paracetamol and combination mixtures of aspirin and paracetamol are likely to contribute to chronic renal impairment. However, there is no convincing data to implicate non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs or aspirin monotherapy in the development of analgesic nephropathy. In the absence of high-level evidence, while controversy persists, it may be prudent for physicians to consider all non-narcotic analgesics to be nephrotoxic with long-term use.

Cardiovascular effects of cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors: a mechanistic and clinical perspective

LINKED ARTICLES

This article is part of a joint Themed section with the British Journal of Pharmacology on Targeting Inflammation to Reduce Cardiovascular Disease Risk: a Realistic Clinical Prospect? The rest of the Themed section will appear in a future issue of BJP and will be available at http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)1476-5381 Prostaglandin (PG) H synthase 2 [also referred to colloquially as cyclooxygenase (COX) 2] represents a key enzyme in arachidonic acid metabolism in health and disease. It is both constitutively expressed in several human tissues (e.g. kidney and brain) and induced in various cell types (including monocytes/macrophages, vascular endothelial cells and colorectal cancer cells) in response to inflammatory cytokines, laminar shear stress and growth factors. Products of COX-2 activity (e.g. PGE2 and prostacyclin) are involved in diverse physiological and pathophysiological processes, including renal haemodynamics and the control of blood pressure, endothelial thromboresistance, pain and inflammation, and colorectal tumorigenesis. Therefore, it is not surprising that COX-2 inhibitors display multifaceted clinical effects, ranging from reduced pain and inflammation to increased blood pressure, an increased risk of atherothrombotic events and a decreased risk of colorectal cancer. The aim of the present article was to review the cardiovascular effects of COX-2 inhibitors [traditional nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (tNSAIDs) and coxibs alike], with a focus on the mechanisms contributing to the clinical readouts of COX-2 inhibition.