1
|
Blease C, Torous J, McMillan B, Hägglund M, Mandl KD. Generative Language Models and Open Notes: Exploring the Promise and Limitations. JMIR MEDICAL EDUCATION 2024; 10:e51183. [PMID: 38175688 PMCID: PMC10797501 DOI: 10.2196/51183] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2023] [Revised: 09/30/2023] [Accepted: 11/10/2023] [Indexed: 01/05/2024]
Abstract
Patients' online record access (ORA) is growing worldwide. In some countries, including the United States and Sweden, access is advanced with patients obtaining rapid access to their full records on the web including laboratory and test results, lists of prescribed medications, vaccinations, and even the very narrative reports written by clinicians (the latter, commonly referred to as "open notes"). In the United States, patient's ORA is also available in a downloadable form for use with other apps. While survey studies have shown that some patients report many benefits from ORA, there remain challenges with implementation around writing clinical documentation that patients may now read. With ORA, the functionality of the record is evolving; it is no longer only an aide memoire for doctors but also a communication tool for patients. Studies suggest that clinicians are changing how they write documentation, inviting worries about accuracy and completeness. Other concerns include work burdens; while few objective studies have examined the impact of ORA on workload, some research suggests that clinicians are spending more time writing notes and answering queries related to patients' records. Aimed at addressing some of these concerns, clinician and patient education strategies have been proposed. In this viewpoint paper, we explore these approaches and suggest another longer-term strategy: the use of generative artificial intelligence (AI) to support clinicians in documenting narrative summaries that patients will find easier to understand. Applied to narrative clinical documentation, we suggest that such approaches may significantly help preserve the accuracy of notes, strengthen writing clarity and signals of empathy and patient-centered care, and serve as a buffer against documentation work burdens. However, we also consider the current risks associated with existing generative AI. We emphasize that for this innovation to play a key role in ORA, the cocreation of clinical notes will be imperative. We also caution that clinicians will need to be supported in how to work alongside generative AI to optimize its considerable potential.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charlotte Blease
- Department of Women's and Children's Health, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
- Digital Psychiatry, Department of Psychiatry, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, United States
| | - John Torous
- Digital Psychiatry, Department of Psychiatry, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Brian McMillan
- Centre for Primary Care and Health Services Research, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Maria Hägglund
- Department of Women's and Children's Health, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
- Medtech Science & Innovation Centre, Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Kenneth D Mandl
- Computational Health Informatics Program, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
DeVito NJ, Goldacre B. Trends and variation in data quality and availability on the European Union Clinical Trials Register: A cross-sectional study. Clin Trials 2022; 19:172-183. [PMID: 35144496 PMCID: PMC9036151 DOI: 10.1177/17407745211073483] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND/AIMS The European Union Clinical Trials Register is a public facing portal containing information on trials of medicinal products conducted under the purview of the European Union regulatory system. As of September 2021, the registry holds information on over 40,000 trials. Given its distinct regulatory purpose, and results reporting requirements, the European Union Clinical Trials Register should be a valuable open-source hub for trial information. Past work examining the European Union Clinical Trials Register has suggested that data quality on the registry may be lacking. We therefore set out to examine the quality and availability of trial data on the registry with a focus on areas that fall under the authority of regulators in each European Union/European Economic Area country. METHODS Using data scraped from the full European Union Clinical Trials Register public dataset, we examined the extent of issues with three areas of trial data availability linked to European Union regulations. We examined whether there is evidence for missing registration of protocols in the public database, whether information on the completion of clinical trials is being made available and how often the results of trials are posted to the registry. We assessed each area overall, and examined variation between national regulators and over time. RESULTS Major issues with the availability of expected protocols and information on trial completion were focused in a few countries. Overall, when comparing enrolment countries from tabular results to available registrations, 26,932 of 31,118 (86.5%) expected protocols were available and 22 of 30 (73%) countries had over 90% of expected protocols available. The majority of missing protocols, totalling 2764 (66%), were from just three countries: France, Norway and Poland. Evidence for this issue is further supported by data on trends in new registrations by country over time. Low availability of data on trial completion is also most pronounced in a minority of countries, like Spain and the Netherlands, with consistent trends for missingness over time. Finally, overall results availability is substantially worse among the 23,623 trials with a single registered European Union protocol (n = 6259, 26.5%) compared to 13,897 of those taking place in multiple countries (n = 8423, 60.6%). Reporting for single-protocol trials was consistently low across both time and location. CONCLUSION Deficiencies in the public availability of trial protocols, trial completion information and summary results complicate the utility of the European Union Clinical Trials Register for research, transparency and accountability efforts. Users of the registry would benefit from a more complete and accurate accounting of the European research environment via the official European Union registry. We recommend regulators at the national and pan-national level undertake routine audits of approved trials to ensure national-level issues are proactively and transparently identified, documented and addressed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicholas J DeVito
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Ben Goldacre
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Gross AS, Harry AC, Clifton CS, Pasqua OD. Clinical Trial Diversity: An Opportunity for Improved Insight into the Determinants of Variability in Drug Response. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2022; 88:2700-2717. [PMID: 35088432 PMCID: PMC9306578 DOI: 10.1111/bcp.15242] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2021] [Revised: 12/22/2021] [Accepted: 01/02/2022] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Although the number of countries participating in pivotal trials submitted to enable drug registration has nearly doubled over the past 25 years, there has not been a substantial increase in the diversity of clinical trial populations. In parallel, our understanding of factors that influence medicine response and variability has continued to evolve. The notion of intrinsic and extrinsic sources of variability has been embedded into different regulatory guidelines, including the recent guideline on the importance of enhancing the diversity of clinical trial populations. In addition to presenting the clinical and scientific reasons for ensuring that clinical trial populations represent the demographics of patient populations, this overview outlines the efforts of regulatory agencies, patient advocacy groups and clinical researchers to attain this goal through strategies to meet representation in recruitment targets and broaden eligibility criteria. Despite these efforts, challenges to participation in clinical trials remain, and certain groups continue to be underrepresented in development programmes. These challenges are amplified when the representativeness of specific groups may vary across countries and regions in a global clinical programme. Whilst enhanced trial diversity is a critical step towards ensuring that results will be representative of patient populations, a concerted effort is required to characterise further the factors influencing interindividual and regional differences in response for global populations. Quantitative clinical pharmacology principles should be applied to allow extrapolation of data across groups or regions as well as provide insight into the effect of patient‐specific characteristics on a medicine's dose rationale and efficacy and safety profiles.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Annette S Gross
- Clinical Pharmacology Modelling & Simulation, GlaxoSmithKline R&D, Sydney, Australia.,Sydney Pharmacy School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Anya C Harry
- Global Demographics & Diversity, Global Clinical Sciences and Delivery, GlaxoSmithKline R&D, Upper Providence, USA.,Current Address: West Pharmaceutical Services, King of Prussia, USA
| | - Christine S Clifton
- Clinical Pharmacology Modelling & Simulation, GlaxoSmithKline R&D, Sydney, Australia
| | - Oscar Della Pasqua
- Clinical Pharmacology Modelling & Simulation, GlaxoSmithKline R&D, Brentford, United Kingdom.,Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics Group, School of Pharmacy - University College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Hanania NA, Caveney S, Soule T, Tombs L, Lettis S, Crim C, Mannino DM, Patel H, Boucot IH. Effect of Age on Efficacy and Safety of Fluticasone Furoate/Vilanterol (FF/VI), Umeclidinium (UMEC), and UMEC + FF/VI in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Analyses of Five Randomized Clinical Trials. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis 2021; 16:1925-1938. [PMID: 34194225 PMCID: PMC8238523 DOI: 10.2147/copd.s302864] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2021] [Accepted: 06/01/2021] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Concerns have been raised about the practical use and clinical benefits of medications and inhalers in older patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Here, we report analyses according to age from five clinical trials evaluating medications administered using the ELLIPTA dry-powder inhaler (DPI). Methods Efficacy and safety according to age groups (<65 and ≥65 years) were assessed using data from five clinical trials in patients ≥40 years of age with symptomatic COPD. There was a mix of pre-specified and post hoc analyses of two 24-week trials with fluticasone furoate (FF)/vilanterol (VI) 100/25 µg; one 24-week trial with umeclidinium (UMEC) 62.5 µg; and two 12-week trials with UMEC 62.5 µg + FF/VI 100/25 µg. The primary endpoint was trough forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) obtained 23 and 24 hours after dosing on the last day of the study. Results A total of 2876 patients <65 years of age and 2148 patients ≥65 years of age were enrolled across all studies of whom 1333 and 1111 patients, respectively, received treatment at the doses presented. Statistically significant and clinically meaningful treatment differences in improvement from baseline in mean trough FEV1 were reported for active comparators versus placebo at study end for both <65 and ≥65 years subgroups (FF/VI vs placebo: 143 mL and 111 mL; UMEC vs placebo: 110 mL and 123 mL; UMEC + FF/VI vs placebo + FF/VI: 136 mL and 105 mL; p<0.001 for all comparisons). The incidence of adverse events reported for active treatments was similar between age groups. Conclusion These data provide evidence to support the use of FF/VI, UMEC, or UMEC + FF/VI, all delivered via the ELLIPTA DPI, to treat older (≥65 years) and younger (<65 years) patients with COPD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicola A Hanania
- Airways Clinical Research Center, Section of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Scott Caveney
- US Medical Affairs, GlaxoSmithKline, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA
| | - Tedi Soule
- US Medical Affairs, GlaxoSmithKline, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA
| | - Lee Tombs
- Precise Approach Ltd, Contingent Worker on Assignment at GlaxoSmithKline, Brentford, Middlesex, UK
| | - Sally Lettis
- Statistics, GlaxoSmithKline, Brentford, Middlesex, UK
| | - Courtney Crim
- R&D, GlaxoSmithKline, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA.,Internal Medicine - Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - David M Mannino
- Department of Preventive Medicine and Environmental Health, University of Kentucky, College of Public Health, Lexington, KY, USA
| | - Hitesh Patel
- US Medical Affairs, GlaxoSmithKline, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Sharma AA, Karekar SR, Shetty YC. An Audit of Clinical Studies Involving Elderly Population Registered in Clinical Trials Registry of India. J Midlife Health 2021; 12:61-65. [PMID: 34188428 PMCID: PMC8189335 DOI: 10.4103/jmh.jmh_254_20] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/04/2020] [Revised: 02/24/2021] [Accepted: 03/01/2021] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
Context: The elderly in India form a heterogeneous subset of the population with significant disease burden variations. However, there are no data available regarding the type of research studies conducted in an elderly population in India. Aims: The aim of this study was to analyze the research studies conducted in the elderly population in India based on data from the Clinical Trials Registry of India (CTRI). Settings and Design: This was an “audit” of available data on the CTRI website. Participants and Methods: Following exemption from the Institutional Ethics Committee, all studies in the elderly population registered in CTRI from its inception (July 2007 to August 2019) were reviewed. Data captured with respect to geographical distribution, study designs used, therapy area, trial registration, and funding. Statistical Analysis Used: The variables were analyzed using descriptive statistics using SPSS version 16.0. Results: Out of a total of 21,400 studies in CTRI, a total of 99 (0.46%) studies involved only elderly patients. Of these studies, 60 (60.6%) were interventional, whereas 39 (39.4%) were observational. Of all the interventional studies, 17 (28%) tested drugs, 26 (43%) tested a lifestyle intervention, and the rest were nutraceuticals, Ayurveda, Yoga and Naturopathy, Unani, Siddha, and Homeopathy, and physiotherapy. Postgraduate theses constituted 60 (60.6%) studies. Eighty-seven (87.9%) were academic projects, eight (8.1%) were government-funded studies, and only four (4%) were pharmaceutical-sponsored studies. The most commonly studied therapy area was the central nervous system, followed by community medicine and orthopedics. Conclusions: This study depicts the underrepresentation of the geriatric population in clinical studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Avi Anil Sharma
- Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Seth GS Medical College and KEM Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Sonali Rajiv Karekar
- Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Seth GS Medical College and KEM Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Yashashri Chandrakant Shetty
- Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Seth GS Medical College and KEM Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Mitchell JM, Patterson JA. The Inclusion of Economic Endpoints as Outcomes in Clinical Trials Reported to ClinicalTrials.gov. J Manag Care Spec Pharm 2020; 26:386-393. [PMID: 32223593 PMCID: PMC10391117 DOI: 10.18553/jmcp.2020.26.4.386] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND As medication expenditures rise, payers are increasingly demanding evidence of economic value for new medications. The 2015 Professional Society for Health Economics and Outcomes Research (ISPOR) Task Force on Cost-Effectiveness Analysis Alongside Clinical Trials noted that clinical trials are increasingly including health care utilization endpoints to address this rising interest in economic information. OBJECTIVES To (a) describe the prevalence of economic endpoints in clinical trials submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov and (b) examine associations between trial characteristics and the inclusion of economic endpoints. METHODS This retrospective review of ClinicalTrials.gov data extracted the characteristics of clinical trials that were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov from January 2004 to December 2018; studied a drug and/or biological; and had a recruitment status of not yet recruiting, recruiting, active but not recruiting, or completed. Studies were classified as containing an economic endpoint based on 2 independent evaluations of the inclusion of endpoints relevant to costs, resource utilization, cost-effectiveness, productivity, absenteeism, presenteeism, or unemployment. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize trial characteristics, and chi-square analyses were used to evaluate differences in characteristics between trials with and without economic endpoints. RESULTS Of the 104,885 trials included in the study, 1,437 (1.37%) included an economic endpoint; among later phase (phase 2/3, 3, 4) trials, 939 (2.54%) included economic endpoints. Compared with studies that did not include economic endpoints, those that did were less often industry funded (48.0% vs. 52.0%, P < 0.001) and were for a high-spend specialty condition (24.1% vs. 27.4%, P < 0.001). The proportion of trials that included economic endpoints increased by a small but significant amount over the time period studied, from 1.2% (2004-2008) to 1.6% (2014-2018; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS A small but growing number of clinical trials are including economic endpoints. This finding may reflect continued industry concerns surrounding the cost and logistical challenges of piggybacking economic data collection alongside clinical trials and/or manufacturers' preferences for modeling for value demonstration. Future research is needed to better understand barriers to the inclusion of economic endpoints as well as the degree to which incorporating health care resource utilization collected during clinical trials into early economic modeling may reduce payer concerns about model transparency and bias. DISCLOSURES No outside funding supported this study. Patterson reports past employment by Indivior, unrelated to this study. Mitchell has nothing to disclose. The research included in this study was presented as a nonreviewed student pharmacist poster at AMCP Nexus 2019; October 30-November 1, 2019; National Harbor, MD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jordan M. Mitchell
- PharmD candidate, Department of Pharmacotherapy & Outcomes Science, Virginia Commonwealth University School of Pharmacy, Richmond
| | - Julie A. Patterson
- Department of Pharmacotherapy & Outcomes Science, Virginia Commonwealth University School of Pharmacy, Richmond
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Efficacy and Safety of Etanercept in Elderly Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Post-Hoc Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Drugs Aging 2019; 36:853-862. [PMID: 31292906 DOI: 10.1007/s40266-019-00691-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Elderly individuals are disproportionately affected by rheumatoid arthritis (RA), but few studies have addressed the efficacy and safety of treatments in this population. OBJECTIVE Our objective was to assess the efficacy and safety of etanercept in elderly patients (aged ≥ 65 years) with RA. METHODS The efficacy analysis was a post hoc analysis of data from the open-label period of three phase IV clinical trials of etanercept for RA. Least squares (LS) change from baseline (cfb) in 28-joint Disease Activity Score (DAS28), Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI), and modified Total Sharp Scores (mTSS) were analyzed by age (< 65 vs. ≥ 65 years) for each study. The safety analyses were of data pooled from the double-blind, placebo-controlled periods of 19 phase I-IV randomized studies of etanercept in patients with RA. The percentage occurrence of adverse events (AEs) in placebo- and etanercept-treated patients was analyzed by age (< 65 vs. ≥ 65 years). RESULTS There were no significant differences in LS mean cfb in DAS28 or mTSS between the two age groups. LS mean cfb in HAQ-DI scores was consistently lower in elderly than in non-elderly patients, although significant differences were not observed in all trials. Overall, AE occurrence was higher in elderly than non-elderly patients, regardless of treatment. In etanercept-treated patients, there were small yet statistically significant increases in the occurrence of congestive heart failure, serious infections, and non-melanoma skin cancers in elderly versus non-elderly patients. For most AEs, occurrence did not significantly differ between elderly and non-elderly patients. CONCLUSION Overall, there were no substantial differences in the efficacy or safety of etanercept between elderly and non-elderly patients with RA.
Collapse
|
8
|
Poli A, Kelfve S, Motel-Klingebiel A. A research tool for measuring non-participation of older people in research on digital health. BMC Public Health 2019; 19:1487. [PMID: 31703655 PMCID: PMC6842243 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-019-7830-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2019] [Accepted: 10/22/2019] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Healthcare services are being increasingly digitalised in European countries. However, in studies evaluating digital health technology, some people are less likely to participate than others, e.g. those who are older, those with a lower level of education and those with poorer digital skills. Such non-participation in research - deriving from the processes of non-recruitment of targeted individuals and self-selection - can be a driver of old-age exclusion from new digital health technologies. We aim to introduce, discuss and test an instrument to measure non-participation in digital health studies, in particular, the process of self-selection. METHODS Based on a review of the relevant literature, we designed an instrument - the NPART survey questionnaire - for the analysis of self-selection, covering five thematic areas: socioeconomic factors, self-rated health and subjective overall quality of life, social participation, time resources, and digital skills and use of technology. The instrument was piloted on 70 older study persons in Sweden, approached during the recruitment process for a trial study. RESULTS Results indicated that participants, as compared to decliners, were on average slightly younger and more educated, and reported better memory, higher social participation, and higher familiarity with and greater use of digital technologies. Overall, the survey questionnaire was able to discriminate between participants and decliners on the key aspects investigated, along the lines of the relevant literature. CONCLUSIONS The NPART survey questionnaire can be applied to characterise non-participation in digital health research, in particular, the process of self-selection. It helps to identify underrepresented groups and their needs. Data generated from such an investigation, combined with hospital registry data on non-recruitment, allows for the implementation of improved sampling strategies, e.g. focused recruitment of underrepresented groups, and for the post hoc adjustment of results generated from biased samples, e.g. weighting procedures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arianna Poli
- Division Ageing and Social Change (ASC), Linköping University, Kungsgatan 40, 601 74 Norrköping, Sweden
| | - Susanne Kelfve
- Division Ageing and Social Change (ASC), Linköping University, Kungsgatan 40, 601 74 Norrköping, Sweden
- Aging Research Center (ARC), Karolinska Institutet & Stockholm University, Gävlegatan 16, 113 30 Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Andreas Motel-Klingebiel
- Division Ageing and Social Change (ASC), Linköping University, Kungsgatan 40, 601 74 Norrköping, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Tannenbaum C, Fritel X, Halme A, van den Heuvel E, Jutai J, Wagg A. Long-term effect of community-based continence promotion on urinary symptoms, falls and healthy active life expectancy among older women: cluster randomised trial. Age Ageing 2019; 48:526-532. [PMID: 31220200 PMCID: PMC6593322 DOI: 10.1093/ageing/afz038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2018] [Revised: 02/10/2019] [Accepted: 03/25/2019] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The long-term effectiveness of group continence promotion delivered via community organisations on female urinary incontinence, falls and healthy life expectancy remains unknown. Methods A pragmatic cluster randomised trial was conducted among 909 women aged 65–98 years with urinary incontinence, recruited from 377 community organisations in the UK, Canada and France. A total of 184 organisations were randomised to an in-person 60-min incontinence self-management workshop (461 participants), and 193 to a control healthy ageing workshop (448 participants). The primary outcome was self-reported incontinence improvement at 1-year. Falls and gains in health utility were secondary outcomes. Results A total 751 women, mean age 78.0, age range 65–98 completed the trial (83%). At 1-year, 15% of the intervention group versus 6.9% of controls reported significant improvements in urinary symptoms, (difference 8.1%, 95% confidence intervals (CI) 4.0–12.1%, intracluster correlation 0.04, number-needed-to-treat 13) and 35% versus 19% reported any improvement (risk difference 16.0%, 95% CI 10.4–21.5, number-needed-to-treat 6). The proportion of fallers decreased from 42% to 36% in the intervention group (−8.0%, 95% CI −14.8 – −1.0) and from 44% to 34% in the control group (−10.3%, 95% CI −17.4 – −3.6), no difference between groups. Both intervention and control groups experienced a gain in health utility (0.022 points (95% CI 0.005–0.04) versus 0.035 (95% CI 0.017–0.052), respectively), with no significant difference between groups. Conclusion Community-based group continence promotion achieves long-term benefits on older women’s urinary symptoms, without improvement in falls or healthy life expectancy compared with participation in a healthy ageing workshop.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cara Tannenbaum
- Department of Geriatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Université de Montréal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Xavier Fritel
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculté de Médecine et Pharmacie, Université de Poitiers, Poitiers, France
| | - Alex Halme
- Department of Geriatrics, Internal Medicine Resident, McGill University, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Eleanor van den Heuvel
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Brunel Institute for Ageing Studies, Brunel University, Uxbridge, UK
| | - Jeffrey Jutai
- Department of Health Sciences, Interdisciplinary School of Health Sciences, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario Canada
| | - Adrian Wagg
- Department of Geriatrics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Ray R, Tombs L, Naya I, Compton C, Lipson DA, Boucot I. Efficacy and safety of the dual bronchodilator combination umeclidinium/vilanterol in COPD by age and airflow limitation severity: A pooled post hoc analysis of seven clinical trials. Pulm Pharmacol Ther 2019; 57:101802. [PMID: 31096036 DOI: 10.1016/j.pupt.2019.101802] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2019] [Revised: 05/01/2019] [Accepted: 05/08/2019] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Elderly patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and those with more severe airway limitation are perceived to experience reduced efficacy from inhaled bronchodilators, especially those administered in a dry powder inhaler. This study compared the efficacy and safety of a long-acting muscarinic antagonist/long-acting β2-agonist dry powder combination in elderly patients with COPD and patients with moderate-to-very severe airflow limitation. METHODS This post hoc pooled analysis of seven randomized studies of ≥12 weeks' duration investigated the efficacy and safety of umeclidinium/vilanterol (UMEC/VI) 62.5/25 μg versus tiotropium (TIO) 18 μg or fluticasone propionate/salmeterol (FP/SAL) 250/50 μg. Change from baseline in trough forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1), a common efficacy measure in all trials, proportion of FEV1 responders (≥100 mL increase from baseline) and safety outcomes were analyzed at Day 28, 56, and 84 in patients classified by age (<65, ≥65, and ≥75 years of age) and severity of baseline airflow limitation (Global initiative for chronic Obstructive Lung Disease [GOLD] stage 2 [moderate] and stage 3/4 [severe/very severe]). A 24-week analysis was also conducted for the UMEC/VI versus TIO comparison. RESULTS The pooled intent-to-treat population comprised 3821 patients (≥65 years: 44-45%; ≥75 years: 9-10%; GOLD stage 3/4: 50-55%); 2246, 874, and 701 patients received UMEC/VI, TIO, or FP/SAL, respectively. Significant improvements in trough FEV1 at Day 84 were observed with UMEC/VI versus TIO or FP/SAL irrespective of age (all p ≤ 0.029) or GOLD stage (all p < 0.001). The proportion of FEV1 responders at Day 84 was significantly greater with UMEC/VI versus TIO or FP/SAL across all age groups (all p ≤ 0.016) and GOLD stages (all p < 0.001). Safety profiles were similar between treatment groups. CONCLUSION UMEC/VI consistently demonstrated improved lung function versus TIO and FP/SAL across age and airflow limitation severity subgroups, with no safety concerns, indicating that UMEC/VI provides no loss in efficacy or additional safety concerns for both elderly patients with COPD and patients with severe/very severe airway limitation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Riju Ray
- US Medical Affairs, GSK, 5 Moore Drive, Research Triangle Park, NC, 27709-3398, USA.
| | - Lee Tombs
- Precise Approach Ltd, Contingent Worker on Assignment at GSK, Stockley Park West, Uxbridge, Middlesex, UK.
| | - Ian Naya
- Global Respiratory Franchise, GSK, 980 Great West Road, Brentford, Middlesex, UK.
| | - Chris Compton
- Global Respiratory Franchise, GSK, 980 Great West Road, Brentford, Middlesex, UK.
| | - David A Lipson
- Respiratory Research and Development, GSK, 1250 S Collegeville Rd, Collegeville, PA, PA, 19426, USA; Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Civic Center Blvd, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.
| | - Isabelle Boucot
- Global Respiratory Franchise, GSK, 980 Great West Road, Brentford, Middlesex, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Abstract
The pragmatic clinical trial addresses scientific questions in a setting close to routine clinical practice and sometimes using routinely collected data. From a regulatory perspective, when evaluating a new medicine before approving marketing authorization, there will never be enough patients studied in all subgroups that may potentially be at higher risk for adverse outcomes, or sufficient patients to detect rare adverse events, or sufficient follow-up time to detect late adverse events that require long exposure times to develop. It may therefore be relevant that post-marketing trials sometimes have more pragmatic characteristics, if there is a need for further efficacy and safety information. A pragmatic study design may reflect a situation close to clinical practice, but may also have greater potential methodological concerns, e.g. regarding the validity and completeness of data when using routinely collected information from registries and health records, the handling of intercurrent events, and misclassification of outcomes. In a regulatory evaluation it is important to be able to isolate the effect of a specific product or substance, and to have a defined population that the results can be referred to. A study feature such as having a wide and permissive inclusion of patients might therefore actually hamper the utility of the results for regulatory purposes. Randomization in a registry-based setting addresses confounding that could otherwise complicate a corresponding non-interventional design, but not any other methodological issues. Attention to methodological basics can help generate reliable study results, and is more important than labelling studies as 'pragmatic'.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rolf Gedeborg
- Swedish Medical Products Agency, Uppsala, Sweden
- CONTACT Rolf Gedeborg Swedish Medical Products Agency, PO Box 26, SE-751 03Uppsala, Sweden
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Impact of Geriatrician-Performed Comprehensive Geriatric Care on Medication Use and Cognitive Function in Older Adults Referred to a Non-Hospital-Based Rehabilitation Unit. Am J Med 2019; 132:93-102.e2. [PMID: 30367848 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2018.09.030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/08/2018] [Revised: 09/23/2018] [Accepted: 09/26/2018] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Eighty-eight percent of older adults referred to Danish non-hospital-based rehabilitation units used ≥5 regular drugs per day at the beginning of rehabilitation. The aim of the study was to explore whether geriatrician-performed comprehensive geriatric care had an impact on medication use and cognitive function in older adults after a 90-day follow-up. METHODS There were 368 individuals aged ≥65 years recruited from 2 Danish non-hospital-based rehabilitation units and randomized to geriatric care (the intervention group) or usual care (the control group). The medication adjustment was the key element of the geriatric intervention. The control group received standard rehabilitation with general practitioners as back-up. The outcomes were prevalence of hyperpolypharmacy (≥10 regular medications prescribed concurrently), the change in medication profile, and cognitive function measured using the Mini-Mental State Examination. RESULTS In the intervention group, fewer persons were exposed to hyperpolypharmacy (odds ratio 0.5; 95% confidence interval, 0.3-0.9) compared with the control group after 90 days. The prevalence of use of proton pump inhibitors, loop diuretics, or antiasthmatic inhalers was lower, while the prevalence of cholecalciferol use was higher in the intervention group compared with the control group. The prevalence of other drug use and cognitive function between groups were not different. CONCLUSIONS Geriatrician-performed comprehensive geriatric care may reduce the prevalence of hyperpolypharmacy and optimize the medication profile in older adults referred to a non-hospital-based rehabilitation. No impact on cognitive function was found.
Collapse
|
13
|
Panagiotou OA, Markozannes G, Adam GP, Kowalski R, Gazula A, Di M, Bond DS, Ryder BA, Trikalinos TA. Comparative Effectiveness and Safety of Bariatric Procedures in Medicare-Eligible Patients: A Systematic Review. JAMA Surg 2018; 153:e183326. [PMID: 30193303 DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2018.3326] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
Importance The prevalence of obesity in patients older than 65 years is increasing. A substantial number of beneficiaries covered by Medicare meet eligibility criteria for bariatric procedures. Objective To assess the comparative effectiveness and safety of bariatric procedures in the Medicare-eligible population. Evidence Review This systematic review was conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines. Articles were identified through searches of PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Cochrane Central Trials Registry, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and scientific information packages from manufacturers, ClinicalTrials.gov, World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, and US Food and Drug Administration drugs and devices portals from January 1, 2000, to June 31, 2017. Randomized and nonrandomized comparative studies that evaluated bariatric procedures in the Medicare-eligible population were eligible. Six researchers extracted data on design, interventions, outcomes, and study quality. Findings were synthesized qualitatively; a planned meta-analysis was not undertaken owing to clinical heterogeneity. Findings A total of 11 455 citations were screened for eligibility. Of those, 16 met the eligibility criteria. Compared with no surgery or conventional weight-loss treatment, bariatric surgery results in greater weight loss. Overall mortality after 30 days is lower among bariatric patients (hazard ratio, HR, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.31-0.79, in the study with the longest follow-up of 5.9 years), although, based on 1 study, mortality within 30 days of surgery was higher than in nonsurgically treated controls (1.55% vs 0.53%; P < .001). Bariatric surgery is associated with lower risk of cardiovascular disease (HR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.44-0.79 in the largest study comparison) and with improvements in respiratory, musculoskeletal, metabolic, and renal outcomes (increase in estimated glomerular filtration rate, 9.84; 95% CI, 8.05-11.62 mL/min/1.73m2). Compared with sleeve gastrectomy (SG) and adjustable gastric banding (AGB), Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) appears to be associated with greater weight loss (percent excess weight loss, 23.8% [95% CI, 16.2%-31.4%] at the longest follow-up of 4 years) but the 3 procedures have similar associations with most non-weight loss outcomes. Overall postoperative complications are not statistically significantly different between RYGB and SG, although major and/or serious complications are more common after RYGB. However, these associations are susceptible to at least moderate risk of confounding, selection, or measurement biases. Conclusions and Relevance In the Medicare population, there is low to moderate strength of evidence that bariatric surgery as a weight loss treatment improves non-weight loss outcomes. Well-designed comparative studies are needed to credibly determine the treatment effects for bariatric procedures in this patient population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Orestis A Panagiotou
- Evidence-based Practice Center, Center for Evidence Synthesis in Health, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, Rhode Island.,Center for Gerontology & Healthcare Research, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, Rhode Island.,Department of Health Services, Policy & Practice, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, Rhode Island
| | - Georgios Markozannes
- Evidence-based Practice Center, Center for Evidence Synthesis in Health, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, Rhode Island.,Department of Hygiene & Epidemiology, University of Ioannina, School of Medicine, Ioannina, Greece
| | - Gaelen P Adam
- Evidence-based Practice Center, Center for Evidence Synthesis in Health, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, Rhode Island
| | - Rishi Kowalski
- Evidence-based Practice Center, Center for Evidence Synthesis in Health, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, Rhode Island.,Department of Biostatistics, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, Rhode Island
| | - Abhilash Gazula
- Evidence-based Practice Center, Center for Evidence Synthesis in Health, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, Rhode Island
| | - Mengyang Di
- Evidence-based Practice Center, Center for Evidence Synthesis in Health, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, Rhode Island
| | - Dale S Bond
- Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, Brown University Warren Alpert Medical School, Providence, Rhode Island.,The Miriam Hospital Weight Control and Diabetes Research Center, Providence, Rhode Island
| | - Beth A Ryder
- Department of General Surgery, Brown University Warren Alpert Medical School, Providence, Rhode Island
| | - Thomas A Trikalinos
- Evidence-based Practice Center, Center for Evidence Synthesis in Health, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, Rhode Island.,Department of Health Services, Policy & Practice, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, Rhode Island
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Bjerk M, Brovold T, Skelton DA, Bergland A. Associations between health-related quality of life, physical function and fear of falling in older fallers receiving home care. BMC Geriatr 2018; 18:253. [PMID: 30348098 PMCID: PMC6198355 DOI: 10.1186/s12877-018-0945-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2018] [Accepted: 10/10/2018] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Falls and injuries in older adults have significant consequences and costs, both personal and to society. Although having a high incidence of falls, high prevalence of fear of falling and a lower quality of life, older adults receiving home care are underrepresented in research on older fallers. The objective of this study is to determine the associations between health-related quality of life (HRQOL), fear of falling and physical function in older fallers receiving home care. METHODS This study employed cross-sectional data from baseline measurements of a randomised controlled trial. 155 participants, aged 67+, with at least one fall in the previous year, from six Norwegian municipalities were included. Data on HRQOL (SF-36), physical function and fear of falling (FES-I) were collected in addition to demographical and other relevant background information. A multivariate regression model was applied. RESULTS A higher score on FES-I, denoting increased fear of falling, was significantly associated with a lower score on almost all subscales of SF-36, denoting reduced HRQOL. Higher age was significantly associated with higher scores on physical function, general health, mental health and the mental component summary. This analysis adjusted for sex, education, living alone, being at risk of or malnourished, physical function like balance and walking speed, cognition and number of falls. CONCLUSION Fear of falling is important for HRQOL in older fallers receiving home care. This association is independent of physical measures. Better physical function is significantly associated with higher physical HRQOL. Future research should address interventions that reduce fear of falling and increase HRQOL in this vulnerable population. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov. NCT02374307 . First registration, 16 February 2015. First enrolment of participants, February 2016.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Bjerk
- Department of Physiotherapy, OsloMet – Oslo Metropolitan University, PO Box 4 St. Olavs plass, 0130 Oslo, Norway
| | - Therese Brovold
- Department of Physiotherapy, OsloMet – Oslo Metropolitan University, PO Box 4 St. Olavs plass, 0130 Oslo, Norway
| | - Dawn A. Skelton
- School of Health and Life Sciences, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK
| | - Astrid Bergland
- Department of Physiotherapy, OsloMet – Oslo Metropolitan University, PO Box 4 St. Olavs plass, 0130 Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Ray R, Tombs L, Asmus MJ, Boucot I, Lipson DA, Compton C, Naya I. Efficacy of Umeclidinium/Vilanterol in Elderly Patients with COPD: A Pooled Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Drugs Aging 2018; 35:637-647. [PMID: 29951734 PMCID: PMC6061430 DOI: 10.1007/s40266-018-0558-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aim of this pooled analysis was to assess the efficacy and safety of umeclidinium/vilanterol (UMEC/VI) 62.5/25 µg dual bronchodilation versus placebo in elderly symptomatic patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). METHODS We conducted a post hoc pooled analysis of data from 10 randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Change from baseline (CFB) in trough forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1), proportion of FEV1 responders (≥ 100-mL increase from baseline), and safety were analyzed in patients aged < 65, ≥ 65, and ≥ 75 years on Days 28, 56, and 84 (12-week analysis of parallel-group design studies), Days 28, 56, 84, 112, 140, 168, and 169 (24-week analysis of parallel-group design studies), and Days 2, 42, and 84 (12-week analysis of crossover design studies). RESULTS The UMEC/VI intent-to-treat (ITT) populations comprised 2246, 1296, and 472 patients in the 12-week parallel-group, 24-week parallel-group, and 12-week crossover analysis, respectively (≥ 65 years: 36-44%; ≥ 75 years: 7-11%). The placebo ITT populations comprised 528, 280, and 505 patients, respectively (≥ 65 years: 37-41%; ≥ 75 years: 5-11%). Significant improvements in trough FEV1 and significantly greater proportions of FEV1 responders were seen with UMEC/VI compared with placebo in all analyses regardless of patient age or timepoint considered (p ≤ 0.023), except Day 84 trough FEV1 CFB in the 12-week crossover analysis in patients aged ≥ 75 years (p = 0.064). UMEC/VI safety profile was similar to placebo in all age groups. CONCLUSIONS In this pooled analysis of RCT data, once-daily UMEC/VI was well tolerated and provided clinically significant lung function benefits compared with placebo in younger and older patients with COPD. FUNDING GlaxoSmithKline (study 208125).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Riju Ray
- US Medical Affairs, GSK, 5 Moore Drive, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, 27709, USA.
| | - Lee Tombs
- Precise Approach Ltd, Contingent Worker on Assignment at GSK, Stockley Park West, Uxbridge, Middlesex, UK
| | - Michael J Asmus
- US Medical Affairs, GSK, 5 Moore Drive, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, 27709, USA
| | | | - David A Lipson
- Respiratory Research and Development, GSK, Collegeville, Pennsylvania, PA, USA
| | - Chris Compton
- Global Respiratory Franchise, GSK, Brentford, Middlesex, UK
| | - Ian Naya
- Global Respiratory Franchise, GSK, Brentford, Middlesex, UK
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Zintchouk D, Gregersen M, Lauritzen T, Damsgaard EM. Geriatrician-performed comprehensive geriatric care in older adults referred to an outpatient community rehabilitation unit: A randomized controlled trial. Eur J Intern Med 2018; 51:18-24. [PMID: 29395938 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejim.2018.01.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2017] [Revised: 01/01/2018] [Accepted: 01/16/2018] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Older adults make increasing demands on all sectors of the healthcare system. We investigated the effect of geriatrician-performed comprehensive geriatric care (CGC) in older adults referred to an outpatient community rehabilitation unit. DESIGN Randomized controlled trial. SETTING Two Danish non-hospital based rehabilitation units. PARTICIPANTS Persons aged 65 or older admitted from home or hospital. INTERVENTION CGC performed by a geriatrician at the rehabilitation unit. OUTCOMES Primary outcome was number of hospital admissions and emergency department (ED) visits. Secondary outcomes were number of ambulatory contacts, general practitioner (GP) contacts, activities of daily living (ADL) and overall quality of life (OQoL). Outcomes were measured within 90 days of admission to the rehabilitation units. RESULTS 368 persons were randomized: 185 to the intervention group (IG) vs 183 to the control group (CG). Groups were comparable at baseline. The number of hospital admissions and ED visits, ambulatory contacts and out of hour GP visits or phone calls did not differ between the groups. The number of daytime GP consultations and visits or phone and email consultations was lower in the IG (P < 0.001). There were no differences in the mean between the groups for ADL and OQoL, but more participants in the IG improved their OQoL (OR 1.63, 95% CI: 1.07-2.48, P = 0.023). CONCLUSION Geriatrician-performed CGC in older adults in an outpatient community rehabilitation unit had no effect on the secondary healthcare utilization, but may reduce primary healthcare utilization and improve OQoL during the 90-day follow-up period. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.govNCT01506219.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dmitri Zintchouk
- Department of Geriatrics, Aarhus University Hospital, Palle-Juul Jensens Boulevard 99, Building J, 8200 Aarhus N, Denmark.
| | - Merete Gregersen
- Department of Geriatrics, Aarhus University Hospital, Palle-Juul Jensens Boulevard 99, Building J, 8200 Aarhus N, Denmark
| | - Torsten Lauritzen
- Department of Public Health, Section of General Medical Practice, Aarhus University, Bartholins Alle 2, Building 123, 8000 Aarhus C, Denmark
| | - Else Marie Damsgaard
- Department of Geriatrics, Aarhus University Hospital, Palle-Juul Jensens Boulevard 99, Building J, 8200 Aarhus N, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Dugas M, Crowley K, Gao GG, Xu T, Agarwal R, Kruglanski AW, Steinle N. Individual differences in regulatory mode moderate the effectiveness of a pilot mHealth trial for diabetes management among older veterans. PLoS One 2018. [PMID: 29513683 PMCID: PMC5841664 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0192807] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
mHealth tools to help people manage chronic illnesses have surged in popularity, but evidence of their effectiveness remains mixed. The aim of this study was to address a gap in the mHealth and health psychology literatures by investigating how individual differences in psychological traits are associated with mHealth effectiveness. Drawing from regulatory mode theory, we tested the role of locomotion and assessment in explaining why mHealth tools are effective for some but not everyone. A 13-week pilot study investigated the effectiveness of an mHealth app in improving health behaviors among older veterans (n = 27) with poorly controlled Type 2 diabetes. We developed a gamified mHealth tool (DiaSocial) aimed at encouraging tracking of glucose control, exercise, nutrition, and medication adherence. Important individual differences in longitudinal trends of adherence, operationalized as points earned for healthy behavior, over the course of the 13-week study period were found. Specifically, low locomotion was associated with unchanging levels of adherence during the course of the study. In contrast, high locomotion was associated with generally stronger adherence although it exhibited a quadratic longitudinal trend. In addition, high assessment was associated with a marginal, positive trend in adherence over time while low assessment was associated with a marginal, negative trend. Next, we examined the relationship between greater adherence and improved clinical outcomes, finding that greater adherence was associated with greater reductions in glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels. Findings from the pilot study suggest that mHealth technologies can help older adults improve their diabetes management, but a “one size fits all” approach may yield suboptimal outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michelle Dugas
- Department of Psychology, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, United States of America
- Center for Health Information & Decision Systems, Robert H Smith School of Business, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, United States of America
- * E-mail:
| | - Kenyon Crowley
- Center for Health Information & Decision Systems, Robert H Smith School of Business, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, United States of America
- College of Information Studies, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, United States of America
| | - Guodong Gordon Gao
- Center for Health Information & Decision Systems, Robert H Smith School of Business, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, United States of America
- Decision, Operations, & Information Technologies, Robert H Smith School of Business, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, United States of America
| | - Timothy Xu
- Department of Biology, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America
| | - Ritu Agarwal
- Center for Health Information & Decision Systems, Robert H Smith School of Business, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, United States of America
- Decision, Operations, & Information Technologies, Robert H Smith School of Business, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, United States of America
| | - Arie W. Kruglanski
- Department of Psychology, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, United States of America
| | - Nanette Steinle
- Maryland Veterans Administration Health Care Center, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America
- University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|