Prevalence and Prognostic Role of BRCA1/2 Variants in Unselected Chinese Breast Cancer Patients

Selection of Germline Genetic Testing Panels in Patients With Cancer: ASCO Guideline

PURPOSE

To guide use of multigene panels for germline genetic testing for patients with cancer.

METHODS

An ASCO Expert Panel convened to develop recommendations on the basis of a systematic review of guidelines, consensus statements, and studies of germline and somatic genetic testing.

RESULTS

Fifty-two guidelines and consensus statements met eligibility criteria for the primary search; 14 studies were identified for Clinical Question 4.

RECOMMENDATIONS

Patients should have a family history taken and recorded that includes details of cancers in first- and second-degree relatives and the patient's ethnicity. When more than one gene is relevant based on personal and/or family history, multigene panel testing should be offered. When considering what genes to include in the panel, the minimal panel should include the more strongly recommended genes from Table 1 and may include those less strongly recommended. A broader panel may be ordered when the potential benefits are clearly identified, and the potential harms from uncertain results should be mitigated. Patients who meet criteria for germline genetic testing should be offered germline testing regardless of results from tumor testing. Patients who would not normally be offered germline genetic testing based on personal and/or family history criteria but who have a pathogenic or likely pathogenic variant identified by tumor testing in a gene listed in Table 2 under the outlined circumstances should be offered germline testing.Additional information is available at www.asco.org/molecular-testing-and-biomarkers-guidelines.

Germline Mutations in 32 Cancer Susceptibility Genes by Next-Generation Sequencing among Breast Cancer Patients

INTRODUCTION

BRCA1/2 germline mutations are the most well-known genetic determinants for breast cancer. However, the distribution of germline mutations in non-BRCA1/2 cancer susceptibility genes in Chinese breast cancer patients is unclear. The association between clinical characteristics and germline mutations remains to be explored.

METHODS

Consecutive breast cancer patients from Peking University People's Hospital were enrolled. Clinical characteristics were collected, and next-generation sequencing was performed using blood samples of participants to identify pathogenic/likely pathogenic (P/LP) germline mutations in 32 cancer susceptibility genes including homologous recombination repair (HRR) genes.

RESULTS

A total of 885 breast cancer patients underwent the detection of germline mutations. 107 P/LP germline mutations of 17 genes were identified in 116 breast cancer patients including 79 (8.9%) in BRCA1/2 and 40 (4.5%) in 15 non-BRCA1/2 genes. PALB2 was the most frequently mutated gene other than BRCA1/2 but still relatively rare (1.1%). There were 38 novel P/LP germline variants detected. P/LP germline mutations in BRCA1/2 were significantly associated with onset age (p < 0.001), the family history of breast/ovarian cancer (p = 0.010), and molecular subtype (p < 0.001), while being correlated with onset age (p < 0.001), site of breast tumor (p = 0.028), and molecular subtype (p < 0.001) in HRR genes.

CONCLUSIONS

The multiple-gene panel prominently increased the detection rate of P/LP germline mutations in 32 cancer susceptibility genes compared to BRCA1/2 alone. Onset younger than or equal to 45 years of age, bilateral and triple-negative breast cancer patients may be more likely to be recommended for detecting P/LP germline mutations in HRR genes.

An overview of the research progress of BRCA gene mutations in breast cancer

The breast cancer susceptibility gene (BRCA) is an important tumor suppressor gene, including BRCA1 and BRCA2, a biomarker that assesses the risk of breast cancer and influences a patient's individualized treatment options. BRCA1/2 mutation (BRCAm) increases the risk of breast cancer. However, breast-conserving surgery is still an option for BRCAm, and prophylactic mastectomy and nipple-sparing mastectomy may also reduce the risk of breast cancer. BRCAm is sensitive to Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor (PARPi) therapy due to specific types of DNA repair defects, and its combination with other DNA damage pathway inhibitors and endocrine therapy and immunotherapy are also used for the treatment of BRCAm breast cancer. The current treatment and research progress of BRCA1/2 mutant breast cancer in this review provides a basis for the individualized treatment of patients with this type of breast cancer.

Using species richness calculations to model the global profile of unsampled pathogenic variants: Examples from BRCA1 and BRCA2

There have been many surveys of genetic variation in BRCA1 and BRCA2 to identify variant prevalence and catalogue population specific variants, yet none have evaluated the magnitude of unobserved variation. We applied species richness estimation methods from ecology to estimate "variant richness" and determine how many germline pathogenic BRCA1/2 variants have yet to be identified and the frequency of these missing variants in different populations. We also estimated the prevalence of germline pathogenic BRCA1/2 variants and identified those expected to be most common. Data was obtained from a literature search including studies conducted globally that tested the entirety of BRCA1/2 for pathogenic variation. Across countries, 45% to 88% of variants were estimated to be missing, i.e., present in the population but not observed in study data. Estimated variant frequencies in each country showed a higher proportion of rare variants compared to recurrent variants. The median prevalence estimate of BRCA1/2 pathogenic variant carriers was 0.64%. BRCA1 c.68_69del is likely the most recurrent BRCA1/2 variant globally due to its estimated prevalence in India. Modeling variant richness using ecology methods may assist in evaluating clinical targeted assays by providing a picture of what is observed with estimates of what is still unknown.

Next-generation sequencing based detection of BRCA1 and BRCA2 large genomic rearrangements in Chinese cancer patients

BRCA1/2 mutation is a biomarker for guiding multiple solid tumor treatment. However, the prevalence of BRCA1/2 large genomic rearrangements (LGRs) in Chinese cancer patients has not been well revealed partially due to technical difficulties in LGR detection. This study utilized next-generation sequencing (NGS) to analyze the BRCA1/2 mutation profile, including LGR, in 56126 Chinese cancer patients. We also reported that two ovarian and breast cancer patients with NGS-determined BRCA1/2 LGR benefited from PARP inhibitors (PARPi). DNA sequencing identified BRCA1/2 variants (including LGR, pathogenic and likely-pathogenic variants) in 2108 individuals. Seventy patients were discovered to harbor germline LGRs in BRCA1 and 14 had germline LGRs in BRCA2. Among the LGRs detected, exon 1-2 deletion was the predominant LGR (14/70) in BRCA1, and exon 22-24 deletion was the most frequent LGR (3/14) in BRCA2. Notably, the BRCA1 exon 7 deletion was a novel LGR and was identified in six patients, suggesting a specific LGR in Chinese cancer patients. The prevalence analysis of BRCA1 and BRCA2 LGRs across multiple cancers revealed that BRCA1 LGR more frequently occurred in ovarian cancer (1.31%, 33/2526), and BRCA2 LGR was more commonly seen in cholangiocarcinoma (0.47%, 2/425). Two ovarian and breast cancer patients with BRCA1/2 LGR benefited from PARPi therapy. This is the first study to reveal the BRCA1/2 LGR profile of a Chinese pan-cancer cohort by using an NGS-based assay. Two breast and ovarian cancer patients harboring NGS-determined BRCA1/2 LGR benefited from PARPi, indicating that NGS-based detection of BRCA1/2 LGR has the potential to guide PARPi treatment.

Prevalence of Tumor Genomic Alterations in Homologous Recombination Repair Genes Among Taiwanese Breast Cancers

PURPOSE

Deleterious germline BRCA1/2 mutations are among the most highly pathogenic variants in hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome. Recently, genes implicated in homologous recombination repair (HRR) pathways have been investigated extensively. Defective HRR genes may indicate potential clinical benefits from PARP (poly ADP ribose polymerase) inhibitors beyond BRCA1/2 mutations.

METHODS

We evaluated the prevalence of BRCA1/2 mutations as well as alterations in HRR genes with targeted sequencing. A total of 648 consecutive breast cancer samples were assayed, and HRR genes were evaluated for prevalence in breast cancer tissues.

RESULTS

Among 648 breast cancers, there were 17 truncating and 2 missense mutations in BRCA1 and 45 truncating and 1 missense mutation in BRCA2, impacting 3% and 5% of the study population (collectively altered in 6%) with cooccurrence of BRCA1/2 in 7 breast cancers. On the other hand, HRR genes were altered in 122 (19%) breast cancers, while TBB (Talazoparib Beyond BRCA) trial-interrogated genes (excluding BRCA1/2) were mutated in 107 (17%) patients. Beyond BRCA1/2, the most prevalent HRR mutant genes came from ARID1A (7%), PALB2 (7%), and PTEN (6%). Collectively, 164 (25%) of the 648 Taiwanese breast cancer samples harbored at least one mutation among HRR genes.

CONCLUSIONS

The prevalence of BRCA1/2 mutations was far below one tenth, while the prevalence of HRR mutations was much higher and approached one-fourth among Taiwanese breast cancers. Further opportunities to take advantage of defective HRR genes for breast cancer treatment should be sought for the realization of precision medicine.

Germline and tumor BRCA1/2 pathogenic variants in Chinese triple-negative breast carcinomas

PURPOSE

BRCA1/2 screening for all triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) patients younger than 60 years may still be an economic burden in China. Further evidences that include incidence and outcome of BRCA1/2 pathogenic variants (PV) screened based on younger age or family history (FH) are worth discussing for improving the cost-effectiveness of BRCA1/2 testing in Chinese TNBC. We aimed to investigate the prevalence of germline and tumor BRCA1/2 PV based on age screening in Chinese TNBC patients.

METHODS

Paired blood and tumor DNA from 124 unselected Chinese TNBC patients with less than or equal to 55 years were collected and analyzed for BRCA1/2 PV. Clinicopathological characteristics including age at diagnosis, FH and follow-up data were collected for further analysis.

RESULTS

The entire frequency of germline and tumor BRCA1/2 PV was 21.0 and 25%, respectively. Among them, 20 (16.1%) germline and 5 (4.0%) somatic BRCA1/2 single-nucleotide variant/insertion/deletions were found by NGS testing, 6 (4.8%) BRCA1 large genomic rearrangements were detected in blood DNA by MPLA. There was significant correlation between FH of HBOC and germline BRCA1/2 PVs among these patients. Patients with tumor BRCA1/2 PVs had significant improvements than non-carriers in PFS (p = 0.047). No significant impacts were found between various mutation status in OS outcomes. No significant differences were found between BRCA1 or BRCA2 and non-carriers in PFS or OS.

CONCLUSION

There is a high incidence of germline and tumor BRCA1/2 PVs in Chinese TNBC patients with less than or equal to 55 years old. Tumor BRCA1/2 PV carriers showed an improved survival outcome. Our results suggest that BRCA1/2 PVs testing addressed within each specific clinical scenario could be more cost-effective for patients.

Association between BRCA mutational status and survival in patients with breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Studies evaluating role of BRCA mutations on the survival outcomes in breast cancer (BC) patients have given confounding results and hence, in this meta-analysis, we assessed the impact of BRCA mutations on survival in BC patients.

METHODS

Studies comparing survival outcomes of BC patients having BRCA mutations against wildtype BRCA phenotype were retrieved from PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library. Overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), and breast cancer-specific survival (BCCS) were the outcomes. Hazard ratio (HR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) was used for analysis. Subgroup analysis was performed for survival based on triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) and follow-up durations. The meta-analysis was performed as per PRISMA guidelines.

RESULTS

Altogether, 30 articles with 35,972 patients (mean age 45.6 years) were included. Patients with BRCA 1 mutation had significantly lower OS (HR [95% CI] 1.2 [1.08, 1.33]; P < 0.001), BRCA 2 mutation had significantly lower DFS (HR [95% CI] 1.35 [1.1, 1.67]; P = 0.0049) and BCSS (HR [95%CI] 1.46 [1.26, 1.7]; P < 0.0001), and TNBC patients with BRCA 1 mutation had significantly poor DFS (HR [95% CI] 1.65 [1.08, 2.54]; P = 0.0216). Based on follow-up duration, the OS in BRCA 1-mutated patients revealed significantly poorer outcomes in studies with ≤ 5 years (HR 1.48) and > 5 years (HR 1.14) of follow-up. In BRCA 2 -mutated patients, the OS was significantly poorer in studies with > 5 years of follow-up (HR 1.39, P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

BC patients with BRCA 1 or BRCA 2 mutations had poor survival outcomes and hence screening patients with BC for BRCA mutations might help in strategizing their treatment and improving their survival.

Genomic Profiling Comparison of Germline BRCA and Non-BRCA Carriers Reveals CCNE1 Amplification as a Risk Factor for Non-BRCA Carriers in Patients With Triple-Negative Breast Cancer

Background: Differences in genomic profiling and immunity-associated parameters between germline BRCA and non-BRCA carriers in TNBC with high tumor burden remain unexplored. This study aimed to compare the differences and explore potential prognostic predictors and therapeutic targets. Methods: The study cohort included 21 consecutive TNBC cases with germline BRCA1/2 mutations and 54 non-BRCA carriers with a tumor size ≥ 2 cm and/or ≥1 affected lymph nodes. Differences in clinicopathological characteristics and genomic profiles were analyzed through next-generation sequencing. Univariate Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox regression model were applied to survival analysis. Immunohistochemistry was used to confirm the consistency between CCNE1 amplification and cyclin E1 protein overexpression. Results: The cohort included 16 and five patients with germline BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations, respectively. Patients with germline BRCA1/2 mutations were diagnosed at a significantly younger age and were more likely to have a family history of breast and/or ovarian cancer. Six non-BRCA carriers (11.11%) carried germline mutations in other cancer susceptibility genes, including five mutations in five homologous recombination repair (HRR) pathway genes (9.26%) and one mutation in MSH3 (1.85%). Somatic mutations in HRR pathway genes were found in 22.22 and 14.29% of the non-BRCA and BRCA carriers, respectively. PIK3CA missense mutation (p = 0.046) and CCNE1 amplification (p = 0.2) were found only in the non-BRCA carriers. The median tumor mutation burden (TMB) was 4.1 Muts/Mb, whereas none of the cases had high microsatellite instability (MSI). BRCA status did not affect disease-free survival (DFS, p = 0.15) or overall survival (OS, p = 0.52). CCNE1 amplification was an independent risk factor for DFS in non-BRCA carriers with TNBC (HR 13.07, 95% CI 2.47-69.24, p = 0.003). Consistency between CCNE1 amplification and cyclin E1 protein overexpression was confirmed with an AUC of 0.967 for cyclin E1 signal intensity. Conclusions: We found differences in genetic alterations between germline BRCA and non-BRCA carriers with TNBC and a high tumor burden. TMB and MSI may not be suitable predictors of TNBC for immune checkpoint inhibitors. Notably, CCNE1 amplification is a novel potential prognostic marker and therapeutic target for non-BRCA carriers with TNBC. Cyclin E1 may be used instead of CCNE1 to improve clinical applicability.

Retrospective reinterpretation and reclassification of BRCA1/2 variants from Chinese population

BACKGROUND

The accurate interpretation of BRCA1/2 variants becomes increasingly important in breast cancer and other related cancers including ovarian cancer, prostate cancer, pancreatic cancer and so forth. In the past decades, especially before year 2015, limitations of techniques and lack of databases and guidelines have led to possible misinterpretation of the clinical significance of sequence variants of BRCA1/2. A published study reported reclassification of some BRCA1/2 variants previously classified as variants of uncertain significance (VUS) to likely pathogenic in breast or ovarian cancer patients from Korea. However, little is known about the situation in Chinese population.

METHODS

We retrospectively retrieved 109 publications studying about BRCA1/2 variants of Chinese population from the year 1999 to year 2019 (March). After excluding publications of meta-analysis and publications with missing data, 72 publications were eventually retained for subsequent analysis. In total, 1,351 BRCA variants (673 BRCA1 variants and 678 BRCA2 variants) derived from 42,430 Chinese cancer patients were standardized and reinterpreted using ACMG/AMP 2015 guidelines and China Expert Consensus on BRCA variant interpretation by genetic counselors.

RESULTS

Among the 1,351 BRCA variants, the majority of interpretation (91.7%, 1,239/1,351) remained the same as previously published. However, there were 112 (8.3%, 112/1,351) variants (64 BRCA1, 48 BRCA2) reclassified with different categories.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results demonstrated that clinical significance of not only VUS, but also pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants varied from time to time in the Chinese population. Precise reinterpretation of BRCA1/2 variants is of crucial importance to genetic counseling or clinical decision-making for risk individuals or patients.

Non-BRCA1/2 Variants Detected in a High-Risk Chilean Cohort With a History of Breast and/or Ovarian Cancer

METHODS

Data were retrospectively collected from the registry of the High-Risk Breast and Ovarian Cancer Program at Clínica Las Condes, Santiago, Chile. Data captured included index case diagnosis, ancestry, family history, and genetic test results.

RESULTS

Three hundred fifteen individuals underwent genetic testing during the study period. The frequency of germline pathogenic and likely pathogenic variants in a breast or ovarian cancer predisposition gene was 20.3%. Of those patients who underwent testing with a panel of both high- and moderate-penetrance genes, 10.5% were found to have pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants in non-BRCA1/2 genes.

CONCLUSION

Testing for non-BRCA1 and -2 mutations may be clinically relevant for individuals who are suspected to have a hereditary breast or ovarian cancer syndrome in Chile. Comprehensive genetic testing of individuals who are at high risk is necessary to further characterize the genetic susceptibility to cancer in Chile.

Prevalence and oncologic outcomes of BRCA 1/2 mutations in unselected triple-negative breast cancer patients in Korea

PURPOSE

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) accounts for 10-20% of all diagnosed BCs and it is enriched in BRCA1 mutation. Guidelines for Western countries suggest that BRCA 1/2 genetic testing should be done for patients with TNBC diagnosed less than 60 years, but there is lack of evidence supporting genetic testing in Asian populations. We determined the prevalence of germline BRCA 1/2 mutations among unselected Korean patients with TNBC and analyzed oncologic outcomes.

METHODS

From among 1628 women with TNBC who underwent surgery at Samsung Medical Center (SMC) between Jul 2008 and Jan 2016, 999 samples were available in the SMC biobank for testing germline BRCA 1/2 mutations using next-generation DNA sequencing.

RESULTS

Overall, 131 Korean patients (13.1%) had BRCA 1/2 mutations: 97 (9.7%) were in BRCA 1, and 35 (3.5%) were in BRCA 2. One patient had both BRCA 1 and BRCA 2 mutations. Overall, 68 distinct pathologic or likely pathogenic variants (43 BRCA1 and 25 BRCA2) were found. Among those diagnosed at ≤ 60 years, the prevalence of BRCA 1/2 mutation was 14.5%. The mean age of diagnosis of BRCA1/2 mutation carriers was significantly younger than that of non-carriers (45.6 vs. 50.1 years, p < 0.0001). The median follow-up duration was 53.6 months. There were no significant differences in disease-free survival, overall survival, or breast cancer-specific survival (p = 0.799, 0.092, and 0.124, respectively) between BRCA 1/2 carriers and non-carriers, although BRCA 1/2 carriers showed significantly worse contralateral breast cancer-free survival (p < 0.0001) than non-carriers.

CONCLUSION

In unselected TNBC patients, we found BRCA 1/2 mutations in 13.1% of overall patients and 14.5% of patients ≤ 60 years. We suggest that Korean women with TNBC diagnosed at ≤ 60 years should be tested for BRCA1/2 mutation.

Inherited mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 in an unselected multiethnic cohort of Asian patients with breast cancer and healthy controls from Malaysia

BACKGROUND

Genetic testing for BRCA1 and BRCA2 is offered typically to selected women based on age of onset and family history of cancer. However, current internationally accepted genetic testing referral guidelines are built mostly on data from cancer genetics clinics in women of European descent. To evaluate the appropriateness of such guidelines in Asians, we have determined the prevalence of germ line variants in an unselected cohort of Asian patients with breast cancer and healthy controls.

METHODS

Germ line DNA from a hospital-based study of 2575 unselected patients with breast cancer and 2809 healthy controls were subjected to amplicon-based targeted sequencing of exonic and proximal splice site junction regions of BRCA1 and BRCA2 using the Fluidigm Access Array system, with sequencing conducted on a Illumina HiSeq2500 platform. Variant calling was performed with GATK UnifiedGenotyper and were validated by Sanger sequencing.

RESULTS

Fifty-five (2.1%) BRCA1 and 66 (2.6%) BRCA2 deleterious mutations were identified among patients with breast cancer and five (0.18%) BRCA1 and six (0.21%) BRCA2 mutations among controls. One thousand one hundred and eighty-six (46%) patients and 97 (80%) carriers fulfilled the National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines for genetic testing.

CONCLUSION

Five per cent of unselected Asian patients with breast cancer carry deleterious variants in BRCA1 or BRCA2. While current referral guidelines identified the majority of carriers, one in two patients would be referred for genetic services. Given that such services are largely unavailable in majority of low-resource settings in Asia, our study highlights the need for more efficient guidelines to identify at-risk individuals in Asia.

The role of BRCA status on prognosis in patients with triple-negative breast cancer

Studies have showed that dysfunction in the breast cancer susceptibility gene (BRCA) is associated with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC); however, its effect on patient survival remains controversial. We investigated the distribution of BRCA1/2 mutations in unselected Chinese patients with TNBC and explored their roles in prognosis. Then a systematic review and meta-analysis were performed to evaluate the prognostic role of BRCA dysfunction, including BRCA1/2 germline/somatic mutations, BRCA1 promoter methylation, and low BRCA1 protein expression in TNBC patients. Pooled hazard ratios with 95% confidence intervals were estimated to determine the association between BRCA dysfunction and survival. Our results showed a high frequency of BRCA1/2 mutations, especially germline BRCA1 variants, were associated with bilateral breast cancer. Although no correlations were found between BRCA1/2 mutations and recurrence-free survival (RFS) or overall survival (OS). In the meta-analysis, patients with BRCA1 promoter methylation showed poor OS. However, there was a favorable impact on disease free survival (DFS) for TNBC patients with BRCA1 promoter methylation when received adjuvant-chemotherapy. In conclusion, BRCA1/2 mutations were associated with bilateral breast cancer and BRCA1 promoter methylation may have a prognostic effect on TNBC.

Clinical Variant Classification: A Comparison of Public Databases and a Commercial Testing Laboratory

BACKGROUND

There is a growing move to consult public databases following receipt of a genetic test result from a clinical laboratory; however, the well-documented limitations of these databases call into question how often clinicians will encounter discordant variant classifications that may introduce uncertainty into patient management. Here, we evaluate discordance in BRCA1 and BRCA2 variant classifications between a single commercial testing laboratory and a public database commonly consulted in clinical practice.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

BRCA1 and BRCA2 variant classifications were obtained from ClinVar and compared with the classifications from a reference laboratory. Full concordance and discordance were determined for variants whose ClinVar entries were of the same pathogenicity (pathogenic, benign, or uncertain). Variants with conflicting ClinVar classifications were considered partially concordant if ≥1 of the listed classifications agreed with the reference laboratory classification.

RESULTS

Four thousand two hundred and fifty unique BRCA1 and BRCA2 variants were available for analysis. Overall, 73.2% of classifications were fully concordant and 12.3% were partially concordant. The remaining 14.5% of variants had discordant classifications, most of which had a definitive classification (pathogenic or benign) from the reference laboratory compared with an uncertain classification in ClinVar (14.0%).

CONCLUSION

Here, we show that discrepant classifications between a public database and single reference laboratory potentially account for 26.7% of variants in BRCA1 and BRCA2. The time and expertise required of clinicians to research these discordant classifications call into question the practicality of checking all test results against a database and suggest that discordant classifications should be interpreted with these limitations in mind.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

With the increasing use of clinical genetic testing for hereditary cancer risk, accurate variant classification is vital to ensuring appropriate medical management. There is a growing move to consult public databases following receipt of a genetic test result from a clinical laboratory; however, we show that up to 26.7% of variants in BRCA1 and BRCA2 have discordant classifications between ClinVar and a reference laboratory. The findings presented in this paper serve as a note of caution regarding the utility of database consultation.

Network Meta-Analysis on the Effects of DNA Damage Response-Related Gene Mutations on Overall Survival of Breast Cancer Based on TCGA Database

The study was conducted for comparing the effects of 12 DNA damage response gene mutations (CHEK1, CHEK2, RAD51, BRCA1, BRCA2, MLH1, MSH2, ATM, ATR, MDC1, PARP1, and FANCF) on the overall survival (OS) of breast cancer (BC) patients. We searched the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database from inception to September 2016. Studies that investigated the association between 12 DNA damage responses related genes and BC consolidated into this Network meta-analysis, by comparing directly or indirectly to evaluate the hazard rate (HR) value and the surface under the cumulative sequence ranking curves (SUCRA). In total four articles were involved. Our results demonstrated 12 DNA damage response gene mutations were associated to the poor prognosis of BC patients (CHEK1: HR = 9.9, 95%CI = 3.6-26.0; CHEK2: HR = 6.9, 95%CI = 3.1-15.0; RAD51: HR = 5.8, 95%CI = 2.2-15.0; BRCA1: HR = 2.8, 95%CI = 1.3-6.1; BRCA2: HR = 3.9, 95%CI = 2.0-7.7; MLH1: HR = 11.0, 95%CI = 3.4-33.0; MSH2: HR = 6.5, 95%CI = 2.1-20.0; ATM: HR = 5.6, 95%CI = 2.6-12.0; ATR: HR = 2.9, 95%CI = 1.3-6.9; MDC1: HR = 15.0, 95%CI = 5.0-45.0; PARP1: HR = 3.4, 95%CI = 1.8-6.6; FANCF: HR = 6.0, 95%CI = 1.8-20.0). SUCRA results revealed that the mutation of MDC1 gene was related to the worst prognosis in patients with BC (SUCRA = 17.32%). DNA damage response gene mutations were associated to the poor prognosis in patients with BC and the BC patients with MDC1 gene mutation had the worst prognosis. J. Cell. Biochem. 118: 4728-4734, 2017. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Surgery of the primary tumor improves survival in women with stage IV breast cancer in Southwest China: A retrospective analysis

The International Consensus Guidelines for advanced breast cancer (ABC) considers that the surgery of the primary tumor for stage IV breast cancer patients does not usually improve the survival. However, studies have showed that resection of the primary tumor may benefit these patients. The correlation between surgery and survival remains unclear.The impact of surgery and other clinical factors on overall survival (OS) of stage IV patients is investigated in West China Hospital. Female patients diagnosed with stage IV breast cancer between 1999 and 2014 were included (N = 223). Univariate and multivariate analysis assessed the association between surgery and OS.One hundred seventy-seven (79.4%) underwent surgery for the primary tumor, and 46 (20.6%) had no surgery. No significant differences were observed in age at diagnosis, T-stage, N-stage, histological grade, molecular subtype, hormone receptor (HR), and number of metastatic sites between 2 groups. Patients in the surgery group had dramatically longer OS (45.6 vs 21.3 months, log-rank P < .001). In univariate analysis, survival was associated with surgical treatment, residence, tumor size, lymph node, HR status, hormonal therapy, and radiotherapy. In multivariate analysis, surgery was an independent prognostic factor for OS [hazard ratio (HR), 0.569; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.329-0.984, P = .044]. Additional independent prognostic factors were hormonal therapy (HR, 0.490; 95% CI 0.300-0.800) and radiotherapy (HR, 0.490; 95% CI 0.293-0.819). In addition, a favorable impact of surgery was observed by subgroup analysis.Our study showed that surgery of the primary breast tumor has a positive impact on OS in with stage IV breast cancer patients.

Molecular Subtypes and Prognosis in Young Mexican Women With Breast Cancer

INTRODUCTION

Young age represents an adverse prognostic factor in breast cancer (BC), and young women present with more advanced and aggressive disease. In Latin America, BC is increasing in young women, and there is a lack of information regarding the characteristics and outcomes of this patient population.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed a database of 4315 women treated for BC at a single institution. We compared clinical characteristics, treatment, and survival between women ≤ 40 and > 40 years of age. Survival analyses were performed for each molecular subtype.

RESULTS

A total of 662 women (15.3%) were ≤ 40 years old. Younger women had more advanced disease, higher grade, and a larger proportion of luminal B and triple-negative tumors (P < .001). At 5 years, both disease-free and overall survival (OS) were lower in younger women, although there were no differences after adjusting for stage. Five-year OS was worse for young women with hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative subtype (82% vs. 87.1%; P = .03), but not for those with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive or triple-negative disease. This difference can be attributed to luminal B tumors, which showed a worse 5-year OS in younger women (79.1% vs. 85.2%; P = .03).

CONCLUSION

Although young Mexican patients with BC have more aggressive disease at presentation than older women, only those with luminal B tumors have a worse survival after adjusting for stage. Strategies aimed at downstaging the disease and at improving the treatment of luminal B tumors in this population are needed.