1
|
Wisch JK, McKay NS, Boerwinkle AH, Kennedy J, Flores S, Handen BL, Christian BT, Head E, Mapstone M, Rafii MS, O'Bryant SE, Price JC, Laymon CM, Krinsky-McHale SJ, Lai F, Rosas HD, Hartley SL, Zaman S, Lott IT, Tudorascu D, Zammit M, Brickman AM, Lee JH, Bird TD, Cohen A, Chrem P, Daniels A, Chhatwal JP, Cruchaga C, Ibanez L, Jucker M, Karch CM, Day GS, Lee JH, Levin J, Llibre-Guerra J, Li Y, Lopera F, Roh JH, Ringman JM, Supnet-Bell C, van Dyck CH, Xiong C, Wang G, Morris JC, McDade E, Bateman RJ, Benzinger TLS, Gordon BA, Ances BM. Comparison of tau spread in people with Down syndrome versus autosomal-dominant Alzheimer's disease: a cross-sectional study. Lancet Neurol 2024; 23:500-510. [PMID: 38631766 PMCID: PMC11209765 DOI: 10.1016/s1474-4422(24)00084-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2023] [Revised: 02/01/2024] [Accepted: 02/21/2024] [Indexed: 04/19/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In people with genetic forms of Alzheimer's disease, such as in Down syndrome and autosomal-dominant Alzheimer's disease, pathological changes specific to Alzheimer's disease (ie, accumulation of amyloid and tau) occur in the brain at a young age, when comorbidities related to ageing are not present. Studies including these cohorts could, therefore, improve our understanding of the early pathogenesis of Alzheimer's disease and be useful when designing preventive interventions targeted at disease pathology or when planning clinical trials. We compared the magnitude, spatial extent, and temporal ordering of tau spread in people with Down syndrome and autosomal-dominant Alzheimer's disease. METHODS In this cross-sectional observational study, we included participants (aged ≥25 years) from two cohort studies. First, we collected data from the Dominantly Inherited Alzheimer's Network studies (DIAN-OBS and DIAN-TU), which include carriers of autosomal-dominant Alzheimer's disease genetic mutations and non-carrier familial controls recruited in Australia, Europe, and the USA between 2008 and 2022. Second, we collected data from the Alzheimer Biomarkers Consortium-Down Syndrome study, which includes people with Down syndrome and sibling controls recruited from the UK and USA between 2015 and 2021. Controls from the two studies were combined into a single group of familial controls. All participants had completed structural MRI and tau PET (18F-flortaucipir) imaging. We applied Gaussian mixture modelling to identify regions of high tau PET burden and regions with the earliest changes in tau binding for each cohort separately. We estimated regional tau PET burden as a function of cortical amyloid burden for both cohorts. Finally, we compared the temporal pattern of tau PET burden relative to that of amyloid. FINDINGS We included 137 people with Down syndrome (mean age 38·5 years [SD 8·2], 74 [54%] male, and 63 [46%] female), 49 individuals with autosomal-dominant Alzheimer's disease (mean age 43·9 years [11·2], 22 [45%] male, and 27 [55%] female), and 85 familial controls, pooled from across both studies (mean age 41·5 years [12·1], 28 [33%] male, and 57 [67%] female), who satisfied the PET quality-control procedure for tau-PET imaging processing. 134 (98%) people with Down syndrome, 44 (90%) with autosomal-dominant Alzheimer's disease, and 77 (91%) controls also completed an amyloid PET scan within 3 years of tau PET imaging. Spatially, tau PET burden was observed most frequently in subcortical and medial temporal regions in people with Down syndrome, and within the medial temporal lobe in people with autosomal-dominant Alzheimer's disease. Across the brain, people with Down syndrome had greater concentrations of tau for a given level of amyloid compared with people with autosomal-dominant Alzheimer's disease. Temporally, increases in tau were more strongly associated with increases in amyloid for people with Down syndrome compared with autosomal-dominant Alzheimer's disease. INTERPRETATION Although the general progression of amyloid followed by tau is similar for people Down syndrome and people with autosomal-dominant Alzheimer's disease, we found subtle differences in the spatial distribution, timing, and magnitude of the tau burden between these two cohorts. These differences might have important implications; differences in the temporal pattern of tau accumulation might influence the timing of drug administration in clinical trials, whereas differences in the spatial pattern and magnitude of tau burden might affect disease progression. FUNDING None.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julie K Wisch
- Department of Neurology, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, MO, USA.
| | - Nicole S McKay
- Department of Radiology, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, MO, USA
| | - Anna H Boerwinkle
- McGovern Medical School, University of Texas in Houston, Houston, TX, USA
| | - James Kennedy
- Department of Neurology, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, MO, USA
| | - Shaney Flores
- Department of Radiology, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, MO, USA
| | - Benjamin L Handen
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Bradley T Christian
- Department of Medical Physics and Psychiatry, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Elizabeth Head
- Department of Pathology, Gillespie Neuroscience Research Facility, University of California, Irvine, CA, USA
| | - Mark Mapstone
- Department of Neurology, University of California Irvine School of Medicine, Irvine, CA, USA
| | - Michael S Rafii
- Alzheimer's Therapeutic Research Institute, Keck School of Medicine of USC, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Sid E O'Bryant
- Institute for Translational Research Department of Pharmacology and Neuroscience, University of North Texas Health Science Center, Fort Worth, TX, USA
| | - Julie C Price
- Department of Radiology, Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, MA, USA
| | - Charles M Laymon
- Department of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Sharon J Krinsky-McHale
- Department of Psychology, New York State Institute for Basic Research in Developmental Disabilities, New York, NY, USA
| | - Florence Lai
- Department of Neurology, Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, MA, USA
| | - H Diana Rosas
- Department of Radiology, Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, MA, USA; Department of Neurology, Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, MA, USA
| | - Sigan L Hartley
- Waisman Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Shahid Zaman
- Cambridge Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities Research Group, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Ira T Lott
- Department of Pediatrics, University of California Irvine School of Medicine, Irvine, CA, USA
| | - Dana Tudorascu
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Matthew Zammit
- Department of Medical Physics and Psychiatry, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Adam M Brickman
- Department of Neurology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Joseph H Lee
- Department of Neurology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA; Department of Epidemiology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Thomas D Bird
- Department of Neurology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Annie Cohen
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Patricio Chrem
- Centro de Memoria y Envejecimiento, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Alisha Daniels
- Department of Neurology, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, MO, USA
| | - Jasmeer P Chhatwal
- Department of Neurology, Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, MA, USA
| | - Carlos Cruchaga
- Department of Psychiatry, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, MO, USA; Hope Center for Neurological Disorders, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, MO, USA
| | - Laura Ibanez
- Department of Psychiatry, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, MO, USA
| | - Mathias Jucker
- Hertie Institute for Clinical Brain Research, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Celeste M Karch
- Department of Neurology, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, MO, USA; Department of Psychiatry, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, MO, USA; German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Gregory S Day
- Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Jae-Hong Lee
- Department of Neurology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asian Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Johannes Levin
- Department of Neurology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany; German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases, site Munich, Munich, Germany; Munich Cluster for Systems Neurology, Munich, Germany
| | - Jorge Llibre-Guerra
- Hope Center for Neurological Disorders, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, MO, USA
| | - Yan Li
- Department of Neurology, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, MO, USA; Department of Biostatistics, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, MO, USA
| | - Francisco Lopera
- Grupo de Neurociencias de Antioquia, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Antioquia, Medellín, Colombia
| | - Jee Hoon Roh
- Departments of Physiology and Neurology, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - John M Ringman
- Alzheimer's Therapeutic Research Institute, Keck School of Medicine of USC, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | | | | | - Chengjie Xiong
- Department of Biostatistics, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, MO, USA
| | - Guoqiao Wang
- Department of Neurology, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, MO, USA; Department of Biostatistics, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, MO, USA
| | - John C Morris
- Department of Neurology, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, MO, USA
| | - Eric McDade
- Department of Neurology, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, MO, USA
| | - Randall J Bateman
- Department of Neurology, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, MO, USA
| | | | - Brian A Gordon
- Department of Radiology, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, MO, USA
| | - Beau M Ances
- Department of Neurology, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, MO, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Su Y, Flores S, Hornbeck RC, Speidel B, Vlassenko AG, Gordon BA, Koeppe RA, Klunk WE, Xiong C, Morris JC, Benzinger TLS. Utilizing the Centiloid scale in cross-sectional and longitudinal PiB PET studies. NEUROIMAGE-CLINICAL 2018; 19:406-416. [PMID: 30035025 PMCID: PMC6051499 DOI: 10.1016/j.nicl.2018.04.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 71] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2017] [Revised: 04/17/2018] [Accepted: 04/22/2018] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
Abstract
Amyloid imaging is a valuable tool for research and diagnosis in dementing disorders. Successful use of this tool is limited by the lack of a common standard in the quantification of amyloid imaging data. The Centiloid approach was recently proposed to address this problem and in this work, we report our implementation of this approach and evaluate the impact of differences in underlying image analysis methodologies using both cross-sectional and longitudinal datasets. The Centiloid approach successfully converts quantitative amyloid burden measurements into a common Centiloid scale (CL) and comparable dynamic range. As expected, the Centiloid values derived from different analytical approaches inherit some of the inherent benefits and drawbacks of the underlying approaches, and these differences result in statistically significant (p < 0.05) differences in the variability and group mean values. Because of these differences, even after expression in CL, the 95% specificity amyloid positivity thresholds derived from different analytic approaches varied from 5.7 CL to 11.9 CL, and the reliable worsening threshold varied from −2.0 CL to 11.0 CL. Although this difference is in part due to the dependency of the threshold determination methodology on the statistical characteristics of the measurements. When amyloid measurements obtained from different centers are combined for analysis, one should not expect Centiloid conversion to eliminate all the differences in amyloid burden measurements due to variabilities in underlying acquisition protocols and analysis techniques. The Centiloid approach brings amyloid burden measurements into a common scale. The Centiloid value inherits the characteristics of the underlying method. The Centiloid value derived from different analysis techniques remains different. The amyloid positivity thresholds in Centiloid are sensitive to implementation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yi Su
- Department of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO 63110, USA; Knight Alzheimer Disease Research Center, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO 63110, USA.
| | - Shaney Flores
- Department of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO 63110, USA
| | - Russ C Hornbeck
- Department of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO 63110, USA
| | - Benjamin Speidel
- Department of Radiology & Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Andrei G Vlassenko
- Department of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO 63110, USA; Knight Alzheimer Disease Research Center, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO 63110, USA
| | - Brian A Gordon
- Department of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO 63110, USA; Knight Alzheimer Disease Research Center, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO 63110, USA
| | - Robert A Koeppe
- Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - William E Klunk
- Department of Neurology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Chengjie Xiong
- Knight Alzheimer Disease Research Center, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO 63110, USA; Division of Biostatistics, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO 63110, USA
| | - John C Morris
- Department of Neurology, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO 63110, USA; Knight Alzheimer Disease Research Center, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO 63110, USA
| | - Tammie L S Benzinger
- Department of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO 63110, USA; Knight Alzheimer Disease Research Center, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO 63110, USA
| |
Collapse
|