1
|
Koshiishi Y, Tanaka S, Iwauchi Y, Baba K. Impact of scanning range and image count on the precision of digitally recorded intermaxillary relationships in interocclusal record using intraoral scanner. J Oral Sci 2024; 66:111-115. [PMID: 38403675 DOI: 10.2334/josnusd.23-0379] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/27/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE The effect of scan range and the number of scanned images on the precision of in vivo intermaxillary relationship reproduction was evaluated using digital scans acquired with an intraoral scanner. METHODS The study involved 15 participants with normal occlusion. Two different interocclusal recording settings were employed using the intraoral scanner (TRIOS 4): 'MIN,' focusing on the minimal scan range of the first molar region, and 'MAX,' including the scan range from the right first premolar to the right second molar. These settings were combined with three different image counts, resulting in six experimental conditions. Interocclusal recordings were performed four times for each condition. Dimensional discrepancies between datasets were analyzed using three-dimensional morphometric software and compared using two-way analysis of variance. RESULTS Median dimensional discrepancies (interquartile range; IQR) of 39.2 (30.7-49.4), 42.2 (32.6-49.3), 30.3 (26.8-44.1), 20.1 (16.0-34.8), 21.8 (19.0-25.1), and 26.6 (19.9-34.5) µm were found for MIN/200, MIN/400, MIN/600, MAX/200, MAX/400, and MAX/600, respectively. Significant differences in dimensional discrepancies according to scan range were found. Wilcoxon signed-rank test showed significant differences between MAX and MIN (P < 0.01). CONCLUSION Scan range may affect the precision of intermaxillary relationship reproduction. Thus, scanning of the most extensive region practically achievable is recommended.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yusuke Koshiishi
- Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Showa University
| | - Shinpei Tanaka
- Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Showa University
| | - Yotaro Iwauchi
- Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Showa University
| | - Kazuyoshi Baba
- Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Showa University
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Okamoto A, Karibe H, Tanaka S, Kawakami T, Shinya A. Reliability of mixed dentition space analysis using a digital model obtained from an optical impression: a preliminary study. BMC Res Notes 2024; 17:12. [PMID: 38167562 PMCID: PMC10763159 DOI: 10.1186/s13104-023-06678-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2023] [Accepted: 12/18/2023] [Indexed: 01/05/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE While mixed dentition space analysis is a common practice in pediatric dentistry, digital models created using an intraoral scanner are not as widely used in clinical settings. This preliminary study used a very small sample size with one reference model and aimed to (1) compare the accuracy of mixed dentition space analysis using a digital model obtained from an optical impression with that of conventional plaster model-based analysis and (2) assess inter-examiner differences. RESULTS The space required for the mandibular permanent canine and premolars and arch length discrepancy were calculated using each model. The largest significant difference between plaster- and digital model-based analyses was identified when the right arch length discrepancy was considered (-0.49 mm; 95% confidence interval: -0.95-0.03); however, the value was considered clinically insignificant. Significant inter-examiner differences were observed for six items of the plaster model; however, no such differences were observed when using the digital model. In conclusion, digital model space analysis may have the same level of accuracy as conventional plaster model analysis and likely results in smaller inter-examiner differences than plaster model analysis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ayuko Okamoto
- Department of Pediatric Dentistry, School of Life Dentistry at Tokyo, The Nippon Dental University, 1-9-20 Fujimi Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo, 102-8159, Japan
| | - Hiroyuki Karibe
- Department of Pediatric Dentistry, School of Life Dentistry at Tokyo, The Nippon Dental University, 1-9-20 Fujimi Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo, 102-8159, Japan.
| | - Satoshi Tanaka
- Department of Pediatric Dentistry, School of Life Dentistry at Tokyo, The Nippon Dental University, 1-9-20 Fujimi Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo, 102-8159, Japan
| | - Tomomi Kawakami
- Department of Pediatric Dentistry, School of Life Dentistry at Tokyo, The Nippon Dental University, 1-9-20 Fujimi Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo, 102-8159, Japan
| | - Akikazu Shinya
- Department of Dental Materials Science, School of Life Dentistry at Tokyo, The Nippon Dental University, 1-9-20 Fujimi Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo, 102-8159, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Schmalzl J, Róth I, Borbély J, Hermann P, Vecsei B. The effect of generation change on the accuracy of full arch digital impressions. BMC Oral Health 2023; 23:766. [PMID: 37853398 PMCID: PMC10585882 DOI: 10.1186/s12903-023-03476-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/12/2023] [Accepted: 09/29/2023] [Indexed: 10/20/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE This study is aimed to evaluate the effect of generation change on accuracy of IOSs on full-arch scans and the inter-operator reliability. METHODS In this study, 6 different IOS were tested: 3Shape Trios 3 (20.1.2.), 3Shape Trios 4 (20.1.1.), Medit i500 (2.3.6.), Medit i700 (2.4.6.), Planmeca Emerald (6.0.1.) and Planmeca Emerald S (6.0.1.). Eighteen dental students, inexperienced in scanning, took part in this study as operators. Each operator made 10 digital impressions; altogether, 30 impressions were made by each scanner. The 30 STL files were imported to the Geomagic Control X program, where they were compared to a reference STL file; the surface point's deviation of the full arch and the distance between the second molars' distobuccal cusps were measured, the inter-operator reliability was also investigated. RESULTS A significant increase in accuracy was found between Trios 3 and 4 in the case of both parameters and between Medit i500 and i700 in the case of full arch. There was no significant difference between Planmeca generations. In case of the inter-operator reliability no significant difference was detected. CONCLUSION Within this current study's limitation, it can be concluded that surface digitalization's accuracy can be modified with generation changes and that digital technology is less technique sensitive than traditional impression taking.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Judit Schmalzl
- Department of Prosthodontics, Semmelweis University, Szentkiralyi street 47, Budapest, 1088, Hungary.
| | - Ivett Róth
- Department of Prosthodontics, Semmelweis University, Szentkiralyi street 47, Budapest, 1088, Hungary
| | - Judit Borbély
- Department of Prosthodontics, Semmelweis University, Szentkiralyi street 47, Budapest, 1088, Hungary
| | - Péter Hermann
- Department of Prosthodontics, Semmelweis University, Szentkiralyi street 47, Budapest, 1088, Hungary
| | - Bálint Vecsei
- Department of Prosthodontics, Semmelweis University, Szentkiralyi street 47, Budapest, 1088, Hungary
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Vogler JAH, Billen L, Walther KA, Wöstmann B. Fibre-reinforced Cad/CAM post and cores: The new "gold standard" for anterior teeth with extensive coronal destruction?-A fully digital chairside workflow. Heliyon 2023; 9:e19048. [PMID: 37609410 PMCID: PMC10440520 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e19048] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2023] [Revised: 07/10/2023] [Accepted: 08/08/2023] [Indexed: 08/24/2023] Open
Abstract
Objectives Since one-third of persons suffer a dental trauma, treatment of anterior teeth using post and core (PC) is becoming important. In teeth with extensive destruction, cast PC (CPC) remain the "gold standard", even though they lead to aesthetic impairment and have a mismatching elastic modulus to that of dentin. Prefabricated fibre-reinforced posts have elastic modulus similar to that of dentin but the accuracy of fit and mechanical stability are worse. This study was aimed to evaluate the deviation and mechanical performance of fibre-reinforced CAD/CAM PC (FRPC) fabricated in a fully digital chairside workflow, compared to those of CPC. Methods On 30 teeth, a PC preparation was conducted, and a conventional and digital post impression were taken with an intraoral scanner. Fifteen teeth each were treated with CPC and FRPC, respectively. The deviation was evaluated by superimposing the datasets of the digitalised stone models and digital post impressions. Decementation and root fracture during chewing simulation were analysed by microscopy and X-ray. Statistical analysis was performed by pairwise comparison and Kaplan-Meier analysis. Results The median deviation for the "coronal", "middle" and "apical" were 14.5, 18.0 and 113.7 μm, respectively. The pairwise comparison for "coronal"/"middle" showed no significance (p = 0.465), whereas that for "coronal"/"apical" and "middle"/"apical" showed highly significant differences (p < 0.001). After chewing simulation, five decementations and two root fractures were detected for CPC. For FRPC, neither decementation nor root fracture were documented. Significance Within the limitations of this study, FRPC performed significantly better than CPC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonas Adrian Helmut Vogler
- Justus Liebig University, Dental Clinic - Department of Prosthodontics, Schlangenzahl 14, 35392, Giessen, Germany
| | - Louise Billen
- Justus Liebig University, Dental Clinic - Department of Prosthodontics, Schlangenzahl 14, 35392, Giessen, Germany
| | - Kay-Arne Walther
- Justus Liebig University, Dental Clinic - Department of Prosthodontics, Schlangenzahl 14, 35392, Giessen, Germany
| | - Bernd Wöstmann
- Justus Liebig University, Dental Clinic - Department of Prosthodontics, Schlangenzahl 14, 35392, Giessen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Akkal O, Korkmaz IH, Bayindir F. Comparison of 3D accuracy of three different digital intraoral scanners in full-arch implant impressions. J Adv Prosthodont 2023; 15:179-188. [PMID: 37662853 PMCID: PMC10471506 DOI: 10.4047/jap.2023.15.4.179] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2023] [Revised: 08/16/2023] [Accepted: 08/21/2023] [Indexed: 09/05/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE This in vitro study aimed to evaluate the performance of digital intraoral scanners in a completely edentulous patient with angled and parallel implants. MATERIALS AND METHODS A total of 6 implants were placed at angulations of 0°, 5°, 0°, 0°, 15°, and 0° in regions #36, #34, #32, #42, #44, and #46, respectively, in a completely edentulous mandibular polyurethane model. Then, the study model created by connecting a scan body on the implants was scanned using a model scanner, and a 3D reference model was obtained. Three different intraoral scanners were used for digital impressions (PS group, TR group, and CS group, n = 10 in each group). The distances and angles between the scan bodies in these measurement groups were measured. RESULTS While the Primescan (PS) impression group had the highest accuracy with 38 µm, the values of 104 µm and 171 µm were obtained with Trios 4 IOSs (TR) and Carestream 3600 (CS), respectively (P = .001). The CS scanner constituted the impression group with the highest deviation in terms of accuracy. In terms of dimensional differences in the angle parameter, a statistically significant difference was revealed among the mean deviation angle values according to the scanners (P < .001). While the lowest angular deviation was obtained with the PS impression group with 0.185°, the values of 0.499° and 1.250° were obtained with TR and CS, respectively. No statistically significant difference was detected among the impression groups in terms of precision values (P > .05). CONCLUSION A statistically significant difference was found among the three digital impression groups upon comparing the impression accuracy. Implant angulation affected the impression accuracy of the digital impression groups. The most accurate impressions in terms of both distance and angle deviation were obtained with the PS impression group.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ozcan Akkal
- Department of Prosthodontics, Atatürk University Faculty of Dentistry, Erzurum, Turkiye
| | - Ismail Hakki Korkmaz
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Architecture, Erzurum Technical University, Erzurum, Turkiye
| | - Funda Bayindir
- Department of Prosthodontics, Atatürk University Faculty of Dentistry, Erzurum, Turkiye
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Kuroda S, Yotsuya M, Sato T, Hisanaga R, Nomoto S, Sekine H. The effect of scanning pathways on trueness and precision in full-arch optical impression. BMC Oral Health 2023; 23:390. [PMID: 37316808 DOI: 10.1186/s12903-023-03101-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2023] [Accepted: 06/02/2023] [Indexed: 06/16/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In this study, we investigated the effects of differences in scanning pathways during optical impression on the trueness and precision of full-arch impressions. METHODS Reference data were obtained using a laboratory scanner. All optical impressions were measured across the dental arch using TRIOS® 3 in four different pathways. The reference and optical impression data were superimposed using the best-fit method. The criteria for superimposition were based on the starting side of the dental arch (partial arch best-fit method, PB) and based on the full arch (full arch best-fit method, FB). The data were compared between the left and right molars (starting and ending sides). The scan deviations for trueness (n = 5) and precision (n = 10) were obtained for each group by calculating the root mean square (RMS) of the deviation at each measurement point. Visual observations using superimposed color map images revealed variations in trueness. RESULTS There were no significant differences in scanning time or amount of scan data between the four scanning pathways. Trueness did not differ significantly among the four pathways with respect to the starting and ending sides, regardless of the superimposition criteria. Precision with PB was significantly different between scanning pathways A and B, and pathways B and C for the starting sides, and between scanning pathways A and B, and pathways A and D for the ending sides. In contrast, there was no significant difference between the starting and ending side in pathways for FB. Regarding PB, color map images showed a large error range in the direction toward the molar radius for the occlusal surface and cervical regions on the ending sides. CONCLUSION Differences in the scanning pathways did not affect trueness, regardless of the superimposition criteria. On the other hand, differences in the scanning pathways affected the precision of the starting and ending sides with PB. Scanning pathways B and D were more precise on the starting and ending sides, respectively.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shota Kuroda
- Department of Fixed Prosthodontics, Tokyo Dental College, 2-9-18 Kandamisakicho Chiyoda-Ku, Tokyo, 101-0061, Japan.
| | - Mamoru Yotsuya
- Department of Fixed Prosthodontics, Tokyo Dental College, 2-9-18 Kandamisakicho Chiyoda-Ku, Tokyo, 101-0061, Japan
| | - Toru Sato
- Department of Fixed Prosthodontics, Tokyo Dental College, 2-9-18 Kandamisakicho Chiyoda-Ku, Tokyo, 101-0061, Japan
| | - Ryuichi Hisanaga
- Department of Fixed Prosthodontics, Tokyo Dental College, 2-9-18 Kandamisakicho Chiyoda-Ku, Tokyo, 101-0061, Japan
| | - Syuntaro Nomoto
- Department of Fixed Prosthodontics, Tokyo Dental College, 2-9-18 Kandamisakicho Chiyoda-Ku, Tokyo, 101-0061, Japan
| | - Hideshi Sekine
- Department of Fixed Prosthodontics, Tokyo Dental College, 2-9-18 Kandamisakicho Chiyoda-Ku, Tokyo, 101-0061, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Gracis S, Appiani A, Noè G. Digital workflow in implant prosthodontics: The critical aspects for reliable accuracy. J ESTHET RESTOR DENT 2023; 35:250-261. [PMID: 36606714 DOI: 10.1111/jerd.13004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2022] [Revised: 12/13/2022] [Accepted: 12/14/2022] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION This paper is a comprehensive treaty about the variables that influence the transfer of the position of an implant to the laboratory when using a digital workflow. OBJECTIVE The aim is to provide operators and manufacturers with a guide on how to improve certain aspects of the digital workflow specific to the fabrication of implant-supported restorations. OVERVIEW It addresses intraoral scanning issues and CAD software issues. In the former, the variables that play a part in the quality of the scan file are investigated: the implant scan body, the IOS and the operator. For the latter, instead, the focus is on those aspects that still today may create inaccuracies in the workflow and in the final product being fabricated: the identification of the specific implant placed in the patient and the generation of a virtual model with the representation of that implant platform correctly positioned in the three dimensions of space. Suggestions and recommendations are given to improve the control on the quality of the digital workflow's output. CONCLUSION In a digital workflow for the fabrication of an implant-supported restoration, the selection and use of the implant scan body, the use of an effective scan strategy and the appropriateness of the best fit function in the CAD software, that is, the procedure of superimposing the library of geometric shapes of the ISB linked to the implant with the shape acquired intraorally, are variables that can influence the positional precision of the FDP. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE Fully understanding the importance of the information enclosed in the ISBs themselves can be crucial in the digital workflow. A proper ISB's selection, a correct scan of the ISB's shape and an accurate CAD superimposition of the ISB's library can lead the clinician to reduce the variables that affect the final result in daily practice.
Collapse
|
8
|
Trueness of full-arch dental models obtained by digital and conventional impression techniques: an in vivo study. Sci Rep 2022; 12:22509. [PMID: 36581668 PMCID: PMC9800571 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-26983-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2022] [Accepted: 12/22/2022] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
The aim of this study was to compare the trueness of complete- and partial-arch impressions obtained using conventional impression materials and intraoral scanners in vivo. Full-arch impressions were taken using polyether and polyvinylsiloxane. Gypsum casts were digitized using a laboratory scanner (IM, AF). Casts obtained from polyether impressions were also scanned using an industrial blue light scanner to construct 3D reference models. Intraoral scanning was performed using CEREC Omnicam (CO) and Trios 3 (TR). Surface matching software (Atos Professional) enabled to determine the mean deviations (mean distances) from the reference casts. Statistically significant discrepancies were calculated using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. The mean distance for trueness ranged from 0.005 mm (TR) to 0.023 mm (IM) for the full arch, from 0.001 mm (CO) to 0.068 mm (IM) for the anterior segment, and from 0.019 mm (AF) to 0.042 mm (IM) for the posterior segment. Comparing the anterior vs. the posterior segment, significantly less deviations were observed for anterior with CO (p < 0.001) and TR (p < 0.001). Full-arch comparisons revealed significant differences between AF vs. IM (p = 0.014), IM vs. CO (p = 0.002), and IM vs. TR (p = 0.001). Full-arch trueness was comparable when using Affinis and the two intraoral scanners CEREC Omnicam and Trios 3. The digital impression devices yielded higher local deviations within the complete arch. Digital impressions of the complete arch are a suitable and reliable alternative to conventional impressions. However, they should be used with caution in the posterior region.Trial registration: Registration number at the German Clinical Trial Register (04.02.2022): DRKS00027988 ( https://trialsearch.who.int/ ).
Collapse
|
9
|
Hou X, Xu X, Zhao M, Kong J, Wang M, Lee ES, Jia Q, Jiang HB. An overview of three-dimensional imaging devices in dentistry. J ESTHET RESTOR DENT 2022; 34:1179-1196. [PMID: 35968802 DOI: 10.1111/jerd.12955] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2022] [Revised: 07/27/2022] [Accepted: 07/28/2022] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To review four types of three-dimensional imaging devices: intraoral scanners, extraoral scanners, cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT), and facial scanners, in terms of their development, technologies, advantages, disadvantages, accuracy, influencing factors, and applications in dentistry. METHODS PubMed (National Library of Medicine) and Google Scholar databases were searched. Additionally, the scanner manufacturers' websites were accessed to obtain relevant data. Four authors independently selected the articles, books, and websites. To exclude duplicates and scrutinize the data, they were uploaded to Mendeley Data. In total, 135 articles, two books, and 17 websites were included. RESULTS Research and clinical practice have shown that oral and facial scanners and CBCT can be used widely in various areas of dentistry with high accuracy. CONCLUSION Although further advancement of these devices is desirable, there is no doubt that digital technology represents the future of dentistry. Furthermore, the combined use of different devices may bring dentistry into a new era. These four devices will play a significant role in clinical utility with high accuracy. The combined use of these devices should be explored further. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE The four devices will play a significant role in clinical use with high accuracy. The combined use of these devices should be explored further.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xingyu Hou
- The Conversationalist Club, School of Stomatology, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, Shandong, China
| | - Xiaotong Xu
- The Conversationalist Club, School of Stomatology, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, Shandong, China
| | - Menghua Zhao
- The Conversationalist Club, School of Stomatology, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, Shandong, China
| | - Jiawen Kong
- The Conversationalist Club, School of Stomatology, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, Shandong, China
| | - Mingchang Wang
- The Conversationalist Club, School of Stomatology, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, Shandong, China
| | - Eui-Seok Lee
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Graduate School of Clinical Dentistry, Korea University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Qi Jia
- The Conversationalist Club, School of Stomatology, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, Shandong, China
| | - Heng Bo Jiang
- The Conversationalist Club, School of Stomatology, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, Shandong, China
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Saccomanno S, Saran S, Vanella V, Mastrapasqua RF, Raffaelli L, Levrini L. The Potential of Digital Impression in Orthodontics. Dent J (Basel) 2022; 10:dj10080147. [PMID: 36005245 PMCID: PMC9406442 DOI: 10.3390/dj10080147] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2022] [Revised: 07/21/2022] [Accepted: 07/28/2022] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Over the past 20 years, there have been many innovations in orthodontic diagnosis and therapy. Among the innovations, there is the taking of dental impressions (DIs). Dental impressions are the negative imprint of hard and soft tissues of one or both arches, and they allow a plaster model to be formed, i.e., a positive reproduction. Traditional dental impressions can be made of different materials, such as alginate, while digital impression is captured by an intra-oral scanner. Digital impression, despite the evident advantages, has not yet replaced the conventional impression. The aim of this study is to evaluate which dental impressions are the most used by dentists. For this purpose, we considered 120 questionnaires sent electronically to patients of different dental private practices from different countries, where the dentists can use both techniques. The results highlighted that the kind of impression adopted is very much influenced by the type of therapy and orthodontic devices used in the treatment. We can conclude that, despite the advent of digital technology, conventional impressions are still used for fixed devices, while digital impressions are more adopted for orthodontic customized devices and therapies with clear aligners, that are very widespread among adult patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sabina Saccomanno
- Department of Health, Life and Environmental Science, University of L’Aquila, Piazza Salvatore Tommasi, 67100 L’Aquila, Italy
- Correspondence:
| | - Stefano Saran
- Department of Human Sciences, Innovation and Territory, School of Dentistry, Postgraduate of Orthodontics, University of Insubria, 21100 Varese, Italy
| | - Valeria Vanella
- Dental School, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | | | - Luca Raffaelli
- Dental School, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Luca Levrini
- Department of Human Sciences, Innovation and Territory, School of Dentistry, Postgraduate of Orthodontics, University of Insubria, 21100 Varese, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Kong L, Li Y, Liu Z. Digital versus conventional full-arch impressions in linear and 3D accuracy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of in vivo studies. Clin Oral Investig 2022; 26:5625-5642. [PMID: 35786783 DOI: 10.1007/s00784-022-04607-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2021] [Accepted: 06/20/2022] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The purpose of this systematic review was to compare the accuracy of digital and conventional full-arch impressions in vivo. MATERIALS AND METHODS This systematic review was conducted according to the PRISMA and registered at the PROSPERO (CRD42021232736). Electronic and hand searches were performed to identify in vivo studies comparing the linear or 3D accuracy of digital and conventional impressions. The risk of bias (ROB) of included studies was assessed by QUADAS-2, and the overall quality of evidence was assessed by GRADE. RESULTS Twenty-two studies met the inclusion criteria, and 13 studies were included in the meta-analysis. There was no significant difference between digital and conventional impressions in the linear measurements of tooth width, anterior Bolton ratio, overall Bolton ratio, intercanine distance (ICD), and intermolar distance (IMD). The repeated measurement mean errors (RMEs) were less than 0.1 mm, the intra-examiner intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) values were more than 0.9, and the inter-examiner ICC values were more than 0.87 for both impression techniques. The 3D deviation between digital and alginate impressions was 0.09 mm. The 3D precision of both impression techniques was less than 0.1 mm. CONCLUSIONS The trueness of digital and alginate full-arch impressions was similar, and both impression techniques showed high precision. More research was needed to compare digital impressions and other conventional impression materials. CLINICAL RELEVANCE For patients with completely natural dentition, the digital impressions obtained directly from intraoral scanning can be considered a viable alternative to alginate impressions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lin Kong
- The State Key Laboratory Breeding Base of Basic Science of Stomatology (Hubei-MOST) & Key Laboratory of Oral Biomedicine Ministry of Education, School & Hospital of Stomatology, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China
| | - Yabing Li
- The State Key Laboratory Breeding Base of Basic Science of Stomatology (Hubei-MOST) & Key Laboratory of Oral Biomedicine Ministry of Education, School & Hospital of Stomatology, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China
| | - Zhijian Liu
- The State Key Laboratory Breeding Base of Basic Science of Stomatology (Hubei-MOST) & Key Laboratory of Oral Biomedicine Ministry of Education, School & Hospital of Stomatology, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China. .,Department of Orthodontics, School and Hospital of Stomatology, Wuhan University, Luoyu Road 237, Hongshan District, Wuhan, 430079, China.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Masu R, Tanaka S, Sanda M, Miyoshi K, Baba K. Effect of assistive devices on the precision of digital impressions for implants placed in edentulous maxilla: an in vitro study. Int J Implant Dent 2021; 7:116. [PMID: 34902092 PMCID: PMC8669067 DOI: 10.1186/s40729-021-00397-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/04/2021] [Accepted: 12/08/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To examine the effect of assistive devices on the precision of digital impression for multiple implants placed in the edentulous maxilla. METHODS A reference model representing an edentulous maxilla with four implants was developed. The digital impression group included three settings: Type 0, without an assistive device; Type 1, with an assistive device connecting only neighboring implants; and Type 2, with an assistive device connecting not only neighboring implants but also the two posterior implants, with perpendicular branches from this bar towards the anterior implants. Digital impressions were made five times for each type using three intraoral scanners (IOSs). For conventional method, silicone impressions and verification jigs were prepared; fabricated plaster models were scanned using a laboratory scanner/industrial 3D scanner. In analysis 1, two-way ANOVA analyzed the effect of IOSs and assistive devices on the precision of digital impressions. In analysis 2, one-way ANOVA compared the silicone impressions, the verification jigs, and the most precise group of digital impressions from analysis 1. RESULTS In analysis 1, the IOS and assistive device type (F = 25.22, p < .0001) effects and the interaction between these two factors (F = 5.64, p = .0005) were statistically significant. In analysis 2, CON, VJ, and digital impression with Type 2 devices (most precise devices in analysis 1) were compared; better precision was obtained by digital impression with Type 2 device than by CON and VJ (F = 30.08, p < .0001). CONCLUSIONS For implants placed in an edentulous maxilla, digital impressions with assistive devices can provide better precision compared to silicone impressions and verification jigs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rena Masu
- Department of Prosthodontics, Showa University School of Dentistry, 2-1-1 Kitasenzoku, Ota-ku, Tokyo, 145-8515, Japan
| | - Shinpei Tanaka
- Department of Prosthodontics, Showa University School of Dentistry, 2-1-1 Kitasenzoku, Ota-ku, Tokyo, 145-8515, Japan
| | - Minoru Sanda
- Department of Prosthodontics, Showa University School of Dentistry, 2-1-1 Kitasenzoku, Ota-ku, Tokyo, 145-8515, Japan
| | - Keita Miyoshi
- Department of Prosthodontics, Showa University School of Dentistry, 2-1-1 Kitasenzoku, Ota-ku, Tokyo, 145-8515, Japan
| | - Kazuyoshi Baba
- Department of Prosthodontics, Showa University School of Dentistry, 2-1-1 Kitasenzoku, Ota-ku, Tokyo, 145-8515, Japan.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Trueness of full-arch IO scans estimated based on 3D translational and rotational deviations of single teeth-an in vitro study. Clin Oral Investig 2021; 26:3273-3286. [PMID: 34837565 PMCID: PMC8898215 DOI: 10.1007/s00784-021-04309-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2020] [Accepted: 11/16/2021] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
Objectives To three-dimensionally evaluate deviations of full-arch intraoral (IO) scans from reference desktop scans in terms of translations and rotations of individual teeth and different types of (mal)occlusion. Materials and methods Three resin model pairs reflecting different tooth (mal)positions were mounted in the phantom head of a dental simulation unit and scanned by three dentists and three non-graduate investigators using a confocal laser IO scanner (Trios 3®). The tooth-crown surfaces of the IO scans and reference scans were superimposed by means of best-fit alignment. A novel method comprising the measurement of individual tooth positions was used to determine the deviations of each tooth in the six degrees of freedom, i.e., in terms of 3D translation and rotation. Deviations between IO and reference scans, among tooth-(mal)position models, and between dentists and non-graduate investigators were analyzed using linear mixed-effects models. Results The overall translational deviations of individual teeth on the IO scans were 76, 32, and 58 µm in the lingual, mesial, and intrusive directions, respectively, resulting in a total displacement of 114 µm. Corresponding rotational deviations were 0.58° buccal tipping, 0.04° mesial tipping, and 0.14° distorotation leading to a combined rotation of 0.78°. These deviations were the smallest for the dental arches with anterior crowding, followed by those with spacing and those with good alignment (p < 0.05). Results were independent of the operator’s level of education. Conclusions Compared to reference desktop scans, individual teeth on full-arch IO scans showed high trueness with total translational and rotational deviations < 115 µm and < 0.80°, respectively. Clinical relevance Available confocal laser IO scanners appear sufficiently accurate for diagnostic and therapeutic orthodontic applications. Results indicate that full-arch IO scanning can be delegated to non-graduate dental staff members.
Collapse
|
14
|
Accuracy of the Intra- and Extra-Oral Scanning Technique for Transferring the Intaglio Surface of a Pontic of Provisional Restorations to Definitive Restorations. MATERIALS 2021; 14:ma14216489. [PMID: 34772015 PMCID: PMC8585418 DOI: 10.3390/ma14216489] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2021] [Revised: 10/21/2021] [Accepted: 10/25/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
When taking the final impression for a three-unit fixed partial denture (FPD), the intaglio surface of the pontic of provisional restoration cannot be transferred accurately to that of definitive restoration. The intra- and extra-oral scanning (IEOS) technique, a method for accurately reproducing the submucosal morphology of the superstructure of an implant, has been reported using an intraoral scanner. In the present study, we evaluated the difference between the conventional impression method using impression material and the IEOS technique in reproducing the morphology of the surface of the pontic of a definitive FPD. There was a significant difference in the trueness of the intaglio surface morphology of the pontic between the conventional method and the IEOS technique; however, no significant difference in precision was observed. As a result, the intaglio surface of the pontic of the three-unit FPD could be transferred to definitive restorations more accurately with the IEOS technique than with the conventional method. These results suggest that the IEOS technique can duplicate the intaglio surface of the pontic more reproducibly to the definitive restorations compared with the conventional method.
Collapse
|
15
|
Evaluation of the Trueness of Digital Implant Impressions According to the Implant Scan Body Orientation and Scanning Method. APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL 2021. [DOI: 10.3390/app11073027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
This study investigated the trueness of a digital implant impression according to the orientation of the implant scan body (ISB) and the scanning method. With the flat surface of the ISB facing either the buccal or proximal direction, the ISB was scanned using one tabletop scanner (T500) and three types of intraoral scanner (TRIOS 3, CS3600, and i500). The effects of differences in the scanning method and ISB orientation were assessed. Postalignment data were subsequently obtained with the abutments generated using a digital library, and superimposed with reference data using a best-fit algorithm, followed by root-mean-square error (RMSE) analysis. The RMSE was lower in the buccal groups (28.15 ± 8.87 μm, mean ± SD) than in the proximal groups (31.94 ± 8.95 μm, p = 0.031), and lower in the full-scan groups (27.92 ± 10.80 μm) than in the partial-scan groups (32.16 ± 6.35 μm, p = 0.016). When using the tabletop scanner, the trueness was higher when the ISB was connected buccally (14.34 ± 0.89 μm) than when it was connected proximally (29.35 ± 1.15 μm, p < 0.001). From the findings of this study it can be concluded that the operator should connect the ISB so that its flat surface faces the buccal direction, and attempt to scan all areas. Additionally, it is advantageous to connect an ISB buccally when using a tabletop scanner.
Collapse
|
16
|
Iwauchi Y, Tanaka S, Kamimura-Sugimura E, Baba K. Clinical evaluation of the precision of interocclusal registration by using digital and conventional techniques. J Prosthet Dent 2021; 128:611-617. [PMID: 33775391 DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2021.01.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2020] [Revised: 01/17/2021] [Accepted: 01/19/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
STATEMENT OF PROBLEM Although studies have evaluated the accuracy of data obtained by intraoral scanners (IOSs), studies on the precision of interocclusal registrations made with IOSs are lacking. PURPOSE The purpose of this clinical study was to compare the precision of IOS interocclusal registration with that of conventional methods with a silicone impression material and a gypsum cast. MATERIAL AND METHODS Eight participants with complete natural dentitions were enrolled. Images of their maxillary and mandibular quadrant arches and their interocclusal relationship were scanned with 2 IOSs: the 3M True Definition Scanner and the TRIOS Scanner 3. In the conventional method, impressions of complete-arch dentition and quadrant-arch dentition were made with a silicone impression material, and gypsum casts were fabricated, mounted on a dental articulator related with a silicone interocclusal record, and scanned with a 3D laboratory scanner. These procedures were repeated 4 times, and 4 sets of interocclusal registration data in standard tessellation language (STL) format were generated for each condition. Interocclusal registration precision was evaluated by determining the discrepancy of the STL data between repeated measurements by using the best-fit-algorithm method. RESULTS The average discrepancies for all participants were 25 ±12 μm for the True Definition, 31 ±7 μm for the TRIOS 3, 154 ±59 μm for the complete arch, and 128 ±33 μm for the quadrant arch. The Kruskal-Wallis test revealed that the effect of the impression methods on the discrepancy was statistically significant (P<.001). The Steel-Dwass test showed that both digital scan methods exhibited significantly smaller discrepancies than the 2 conventional methods (P=.005). CONCLUSIONS These results suggest that the intermaxillary relationship captured by the digital scan method by using IOSs had better precision than that obtained by the conventional method.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yotaro Iwauchi
- Predoctoral student, Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Showa University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Shinpei Tanaka
- Assistant Professor, Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Showa University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Emi Kamimura-Sugimura
- Lecturer, Department of Oral Microbiology and Immunology, School of Dentistry, Showa University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kazuyoshi Baba
- Professor and Chair, Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Showa University, Tokyo, Japan.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Schmidt A, Klussmann L, Schlenz MA, Wöstmann B. Elastic deformation of the mandibular jaw revisited-a clinical comparison between digital and conventional impressions using a reference. Clin Oral Investig 2021; 25:4635-4642. [PMID: 33442777 PMCID: PMC8310469 DOI: 10.1007/s00784-021-03777-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2020] [Accepted: 01/04/2021] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
Objectives Due to the partly strongly differing results in the literature, the aim of the present study was to investigate a possible deformation of the mandible during mouth opening using an intraoral scanner (IOS) and a conventional impression for comparison with a reference aid. Materials and methods Four steel spheres were reversibly luted in the mandibular (n = 50) with a metallic reference aid at maximum mouth opening (MMO). Two digital impressions (Trios3), at MMO and at slightly mouth opening SMO and a conventional impression (Impregum), were taken as the measuring accuracy of the reference structure was already known. Difference between MMO-SMO for digital impressions and deviations between digital and conventional (SMO) were calculated. Furthermore, the angle between the normal vectors of two constructed planes was measured. Statistical analysis was performed with SPSS25. Results Deviations for linear distances ranged from −1 ± 3 μm up to 17 ± 78 μm (digital impressions, MMO-SMO), from 19 ± 16 μm up to 132 ± 90 μm (digital impressions, SMO), and from 28 ± 17 μm up to 60 ± 52 μm (conventional impressions, SMO). There were no significant differences for digital impressions (MMO-SMO), and there were significant differences between the conventional and digital impressions at SMO. Conclusions Based on the results of the present study, no mandibular deformation could be detected during mouth opening with regard to the digital impressions. The results were rather within the measuring tolerance of the intraoral scanner. Clinical relevance Based on the present study, no deformation of the mandibular during mouth opening could be observed at the level previously assumed. Therewith related, dental techniques related to a possible mandibular deformation therefore should be reconsidered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander Schmidt
- Department of Prosthodontics, Dental Clinic, Justus Liebig University, Schlangenzahl 14, 35392, Giessen, Germany.
| | - Leona Klussmann
- Department of Prosthodontics, Dental Clinic, Justus Liebig University, Schlangenzahl 14, 35392, Giessen, Germany
| | - Maximiliane A Schlenz
- Department of Prosthodontics, Dental Clinic, Justus Liebig University, Schlangenzahl 14, 35392, Giessen, Germany
| | - Bernd Wöstmann
- Department of Prosthodontics, Dental Clinic, Justus Liebig University, Schlangenzahl 14, 35392, Giessen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Keshtgar S, Tosson F, Mavani D, Sadhia Hussain R, Movahedi S, Austin R. Service Evaluation of Recording Jaw Registrations for Removable Partial Dentures in NHS General Dental Practices. Prim Dent J 2020; 9:49-55. [PMID: 32519609 DOI: 10.1177/2050168420911030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
AIMS To establish the prevalence of jaw registrations being taken for removable partial dentures (RPDs) in primary dental NHS practices. METHOD 271 RPDs made by 16 general dental practitioners across four NHS dental practices were evaluated prospectively. The number of teeth replaced, whether jaw registration was undertaken, and the number of denture adjustment appointments were recorded. Telephone interviews with dental technicians were held to establish their preferred jaw registrations material. MAIN FINDINGS Jaw registrations were not carried out in 27% (n=72) of RPD. When jaw registration was recorded, 14% (n=28) required a further denture adjustment appointment. 64% (n=46) of dentures where jaw registration was not recorded required at least one further denture adjustment appointment. Dental technicians unanimously preferred a squash-bite wax block, with centre and canine positions marked and cast models secured with elastic bands. CONCLUSION Overall, recording a jaw registration reduced the number of denture adjustment appointments required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Safoora Keshtgar
- Centre for Oral, Clinical and Translational Science, King's College London Dental Institute
| | - Francesca Tosson
- Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust.,Centre for Oral, Clinical and Translational Science, King's College London Dental Institute
| | - Disha Mavani
- Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust.,Centre for Oral, Clinical and Translational Science, King's College London Dental Institute
| | - Rima Sadhia Hussain
- Associate Dentist.,Centre for Oral, Clinical and Translational Science, King's College London Dental Institute
| | - Sana Movahedi
- Regional Associate Postgraduate Dental Dean.,Centre for Oral, Clinical and Translational Science, King's College London Dental Institute
| | - Rupert Austin
- Centre for Oral, Clinical and Translational Science, King's College London Dental Institute
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Cicciù M, Fiorillo L, D’Amico C, Gambino D, Amantia EM, Laino L, Crimi S, Campagna P, Bianchi A, Herford AS, Cervino G. 3D Digital Impression Systems Compared with Traditional Techniques in Dentistry: A Recent Data Systematic Review. MATERIALS (BASEL, SWITZERLAND) 2020; 13:E1982. [PMID: 32340384 PMCID: PMC7215909 DOI: 10.3390/ma13081982] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2020] [Revised: 04/14/2020] [Accepted: 04/21/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
The advent of new technologies in the field of medicine and dentistry is giving improvements that lead the clinicians to have materials and procedures able to improve patients' quality of life. In dentistry, the last digital techniques offer a fully digital computerized workflow that does not include the standard multiple traditional phases. The purpose of this study is to evaluate all clinical trials and clinical randomized trials related to the digital or dental impression technique in prosthetic dentistry trying to give the readers global information about advantages and disadvantages of each procedure. Data collection was conducted in the main scientific search engines, including articles from the last 10 years, in order to obtain results that do not concern obsolete impression techniques. Elsevier, Pubmed and Embase have been screened as sources for performing the research. The results data demonstrated how the working time appears to be improved with digital workflow, but without a significant result (P = 0.72596). The papers have been selected following the Population Intervention Comparison Outcome (PICO) question, which is related to the progress on dental impression materials and technique. The comparison between dentists or practitioners with respect to classic impression procedures, and students open to new device and digital techniques seem to be the key factor on the final impression technique choice. Surely, digital techniques will end up supplanting the analogical ones altogether, improving the quality of oral rehabilitations, the economics of dental practice and also the perception by our patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marco Cicciù
- Department of Biomedical and Dental Sciences and Morphological and Functional Imaging, Messina University, 98100 Messina, Italy; (L.F.); (C.D.); (D.G.); (E.M.A.); (G.C.)
| | - Luca Fiorillo
- Department of Biomedical and Dental Sciences and Morphological and Functional Imaging, Messina University, 98100 Messina, Italy; (L.F.); (C.D.); (D.G.); (E.M.A.); (G.C.)
| | - Cesare D’Amico
- Department of Biomedical and Dental Sciences and Morphological and Functional Imaging, Messina University, 98100 Messina, Italy; (L.F.); (C.D.); (D.G.); (E.M.A.); (G.C.)
| | - Dario Gambino
- Department of Biomedical and Dental Sciences and Morphological and Functional Imaging, Messina University, 98100 Messina, Italy; (L.F.); (C.D.); (D.G.); (E.M.A.); (G.C.)
| | - Emanuele Mario Amantia
- Department of Biomedical and Dental Sciences and Morphological and Functional Imaging, Messina University, 98100 Messina, Italy; (L.F.); (C.D.); (D.G.); (E.M.A.); (G.C.)
| | - Luigi Laino
- Multidisciplinary Department of Medical-Surgical and Odontostomatological Specialties, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, 80100 Naples, Italy;
| | - Salvatore Crimi
- Department of General Surgery and Medical Surgery Specialties, University of Catania, 95100 Catania, Italy; (S.C.); (P.C.); (A.B.)
| | - Paola Campagna
- Department of General Surgery and Medical Surgery Specialties, University of Catania, 95100 Catania, Italy; (S.C.); (P.C.); (A.B.)
| | - Alberto Bianchi
- Department of General Surgery and Medical Surgery Specialties, University of Catania, 95100 Catania, Italy; (S.C.); (P.C.); (A.B.)
| | - Alan Scott Herford
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, CA 92354, USA;
| | - Gabriele Cervino
- Department of Biomedical and Dental Sciences and Morphological and Functional Imaging, Messina University, 98100 Messina, Italy; (L.F.); (C.D.); (D.G.); (E.M.A.); (G.C.)
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Schmidt A, Klussmann L, Wöstmann B, Schlenz MA. Accuracy of Digital and Conventional Full-Arch Impressions in Patients: An Update. J Clin Med 2020; 9:jcm9030688. [PMID: 32143433 PMCID: PMC7141355 DOI: 10.3390/jcm9030688] [Citation(s) in RCA: 48] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2020] [Revised: 02/25/2020] [Accepted: 03/02/2020] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
The aim of this clinical study was to update the available data in the literature regarding the transfer accuracy (trueness/precision) of four current intraoral scanners (IOS) equipped with the latest software versions and to compare these data with conventional impressions (CVI). A metallic reference aid served as a reference dataset. Four digital impressions (Trios3Cart, Trios3Pod, Trios4Pod, and Primescan) and one CVI were investigated in five patients. Scan data were analyzed using three-dimensional analysis software and conventional models using a coordinate measurement machine. The transfer accuracy between the reference aid and the impression methods were compared. Differences with p < 0.05 were considered to be statistically significant. Overall, mean ± standard deviation (SD) transfer accuracy ranged from 24.6 ± 17.7 µm (CVI) to 204.5 ± 182.1 µm (Trios3Pod). The Primescan yielded the lowest deviation for digital impressions (33.8 ± 31.5 µm), followed by Trios4Pod (65.2 ± 52.9 µm), Trios3Cart (84.7 ± 120.3 µm), and Trios3Pod. Within the limitations of this study, current IOS equipped with the latest software versions demonstrated less deviation for short-span distances compared with the conventional impression technique. However, for long-span distances, the conventional impression technique provided the lowest deviation. Overall, currently available IOS systems demonstrated improvement regarding transfer accuracy of full-arch scans in patients.
Collapse
|
21
|
Schmidt A, Klussmann L, Wöstmann B, Schlenz MA. Accuracy of Digital and Conventional Full-Arch Impressions in Patients: An Update. J Clin Med 2020. [PMID: 32143433 DOI: 10.3390/jcm9030688.pmid:32143433;pmcid:pmc7141355] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/25/2023] Open
Abstract
The aim of this clinical study was to update the available data in the literature regarding the transfer accuracy (trueness/precision) of four current intraoral scanners (IOS) equipped with the latest software versions and to compare these data with conventional impressions (CVI). A metallic reference aid served as a reference dataset. Four digital impressions (Trios3Cart, Trios3Pod, Trios4Pod, and Primescan) and one CVI were investigated in five patients. Scan data were analyzed using three-dimensional analysis software and conventional models using a coordinate measurement machine. The transfer accuracy between the reference aid and the impression methods were compared. Differences with p < 0.05 were considered to be statistically significant. Overall, mean ± standard deviation (SD) transfer accuracy ranged from 24.6 ± 17.7 µm (CVI) to 204.5 ± 182.1 µm (Trios3Pod). The Primescan yielded the lowest deviation for digital impressions (33.8 ± 31.5 µm), followed by Trios4Pod (65.2 ± 52.9 µm), Trios3Cart (84.7 ± 120.3 µm), and Trios3Pod. Within the limitations of this study, current IOS equipped with the latest software versions demonstrated less deviation for short-span distances compared with the conventional impression technique. However, for long-span distances, the conventional impression technique provided the lowest deviation. Overall, currently available IOS systems demonstrated improvement regarding transfer accuracy of full-arch scans in patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander Schmidt
- Justus Liebig University, Dental Clinic-Department of Prosthodontics, Schlangenzahl 14, 35392 Giessen, Germany
| | - Leona Klussmann
- Justus Liebig University, Dental Clinic-Department of Prosthodontics, Schlangenzahl 14, 35392 Giessen, Germany
| | - Bernd Wöstmann
- Justus Liebig University, Dental Clinic-Department of Prosthodontics, Schlangenzahl 14, 35392 Giessen, Germany
| | - Maximiliane Amelie Schlenz
- Justus Liebig University, Dental Clinic-Department of Prosthodontics, Schlangenzahl 14, 35392 Giessen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Matsuda T, Kurahashi K, Maeda N, Goto T, Ichikawa T. Geometric assessment of imaging methods for complete denture form: Comparisons among cone-beam computed tomography, desktop dental scanning, and handheld optical scanning. J Prosthodont Res 2020; 64:485-489. [PMID: 32063544 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpor.2020.01.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2019] [Revised: 11/29/2019] [Accepted: 01/08/2020] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The present study aimed to examine three methods for imaging a complete denture form and to discuss the geometric assessment and availability of these methods. METHODS Three methods were used: cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT), desktop dental scanning (DDS), and handheld optical scanning (HOS). Three sides of a cuboid resin block of a known size were measured on the captured images. Ten upper and lower complete dentures were digitized using each of the three methods. The denture forms in the standard triangulated language format were reconstructed using the computer aided design software with three resolutions: 0.1, 0.5 and 1.0. The two images were superimposed through a least-square algorithm, and the mean differences were examined among the three types of imaging methods and resolutions. RESULTS The smallest mean differences and variations were obtained for CBCT and DDS, followed by HOS in the experiment using resin block. The lengths of longitudinal and horizontal sides were shortened in CBCT and DDS, whereas the height was shortened in HOS. The variations in each direction were very small by repetitive imaging within every imaging method. The difference between the CBCT and DDS was significantly smaller than that in the other two groups in experiment using actual dentures. The influence of resolution was comparatively low. CONCLUSIONS The results suggested that CBCT and DDS had a similar geometric assessment, but that of the HOS was lower.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Takashi Matsuda
- Department of Prosthodontics and Oral Rehabilitation, Tokushima University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, 3-18-15 Kuramoto-cho, Tokushima 770-8504, Japan.
| | - Kosuke Kurahashi
- Department of Prosthodontics and Oral Rehabilitation, Tokushima University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, 3-18-15 Kuramoto-cho, Tokushima 770-8504, Japan
| | - Naoki Maeda
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Tokushima University, Tokushima, Japan
| | - Takaharu Goto
- Department of Prosthodontics and Oral Rehabilitation, Tokushima University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, 3-18-15 Kuramoto-cho, Tokushima 770-8504, Japan
| | - Tetsuo Ichikawa
- Department of Prosthodontics and Oral Rehabilitation, Tokushima University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, 3-18-15 Kuramoto-cho, Tokushima 770-8504, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Dalessandri D, Tonni I, Laffranchi L, Migliorati M, Isola G, Bonetti S, Visconti L, Paganelli C. Evaluation of a Digital Protocol for Pre-Surgical Orthopedic Treatment of Cleft Lip and Palate in Newborn Patients: A Pilot Study. Dent J (Basel) 2019; 7:E111. [PMID: 31835442 PMCID: PMC6960660 DOI: 10.3390/dj7040111] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2019] [Revised: 11/25/2019] [Accepted: 12/03/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy, invasiveness and impact on clinical results of a digital oral impression protocol in the pre-surgical orthopedic treatment (PSOT) of newborn cleft lip and palate (CLP) patients undergoing primary alveolar surgical repair. Six patients were divided, according to impression technique used, into a digital (intraoral scanner (IOS)) and a non-digital (tray and putty (T&P)) group. Parents considered IOS impressions to be less invasive, compared to T&P impressions. The clinician that took all the impressions considered the IOS to be less stressful compared to the T&P method. In two T&P patients, the impression was repeated because some important anatomical details were missing, in one case due to patient regurgitation during the first attempt. No impression was repeated, and any adverse event was reported in the IOS group. There were no significant differences between these two protocols in pre-surgical alveolar gap reduction and surgical challenge. The study results indicate that this digital protocol can accelerate the production process of the passive molding plate with an instantaneous transmission of the digital impression to the dental lab, maintaining the same accuracy level and clinical outcomes of classical techniques and reducing the invasiveness of impression taking, avoiding any risk of impression material ingestion or inhalation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Domenico Dalessandri
- School of Dentistry, Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties, Radiological Sciences, and Public Health, University of Brescia, Piazzale Spedali Civili 1, 25123 Brescia, Italy; (I.T.); (L.L.); (S.B.); (L.V.); (C.P.)
| | - Ingrid Tonni
- School of Dentistry, Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties, Radiological Sciences, and Public Health, University of Brescia, Piazzale Spedali Civili 1, 25123 Brescia, Italy; (I.T.); (L.L.); (S.B.); (L.V.); (C.P.)
| | - Laura Laffranchi
- School of Dentistry, Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties, Radiological Sciences, and Public Health, University of Brescia, Piazzale Spedali Civili 1, 25123 Brescia, Italy; (I.T.); (L.L.); (S.B.); (L.V.); (C.P.)
| | - Marco Migliorati
- Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, University of Genova, Largo Rossana Benzi 10, 16132 Genova, Italy;
| | - Gaetano Isola
- School of Dentistry, Department of General Surgery and Medical and Surgical Specialties, University of Catania, Via S. Sofia 78, 95123 Catania, Italy;
| | - Stefano Bonetti
- School of Dentistry, Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties, Radiological Sciences, and Public Health, University of Brescia, Piazzale Spedali Civili 1, 25123 Brescia, Italy; (I.T.); (L.L.); (S.B.); (L.V.); (C.P.)
| | - Luca Visconti
- School of Dentistry, Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties, Radiological Sciences, and Public Health, University of Brescia, Piazzale Spedali Civili 1, 25123 Brescia, Italy; (I.T.); (L.L.); (S.B.); (L.V.); (C.P.)
| | - Corrado Paganelli
- School of Dentistry, Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties, Radiological Sciences, and Public Health, University of Brescia, Piazzale Spedali Civili 1, 25123 Brescia, Italy; (I.T.); (L.L.); (S.B.); (L.V.); (C.P.)
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Miyoshi K, Tanaka S, Yokoyama S, Sanda M, Baba K. Effects of different types of intraoral scanners and scanning ranges on the precision of digital implant impressions in edentulous maxilla: An in vitro study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2019; 31:74-83. [PMID: 31608509 DOI: 10.1111/clr.13548] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2019] [Revised: 09/22/2019] [Accepted: 10/01/2019] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study aimed to evaluate the precision of digital implant impressions in comparison with conventional impressions and assess the impact of the scanning range on precision. MATERIALS AND METHODS An edentulous maxilla model with six implants was scanned with four intraoral scanners (IOSs) and a dental laboratory scanner five times each, and stereolithography (STL) data were generated. A conventional silicone impression was made, and a model was fabricated, which was scanned using the laboratory scanner. This procedure was also repeated five times. Nine different ranges of interest (ROIs) were defined, and the average discrepancies of the measurement points between each pair of STL images out of five for each ROI were calculated. The effects of "impression method" and "ROI" on precision, as evaluated by the averaged discrepancy, were tested by two-way analysis of variance (p < .05). RESULTS The effects of "impression methods" and "ROI" and their interactions were statistically significant. The discrepancies in the scanned datasets of the dental laboratory scanner were significantly lower than those in the other impression methods. The discrepancies of the IOSs were comparable with those of the laboratory scanner when the ROI was limited, however; the discrepancies deteriorated when the ROI expanded across the arch, while those of the laboratory scanner remained stable irrespective of the ROI. CONCLUSIONS Within the limitation of this in vitro study, digital implant impressions by IOSs may show clinically acceptable precision when the scan range is limited, such as in 3-unit superstructure supported by two implants.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Keita Miyoshi
- Department of Prosthodontics, Showa University School of Dentistry, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Shinpei Tanaka
- Department of Prosthodontics, Showa University School of Dentistry, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Sawako Yokoyama
- Department of Prosthodontics, Showa University School of Dentistry, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Minoru Sanda
- Department of Prosthodontics, Showa University School of Dentistry, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kazuyoshi Baba
- Department of Prosthodontics, Showa University School of Dentistry, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Emir F, Ayyıldız S. Evaluation of the trueness and precision of eight extraoral laboratory scanners with a complete-arch model: a three-dimensional analysis. J Prosthodont Res 2019; 63:434-439. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jpor.2019.03.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/23/2018] [Revised: 02/27/2019] [Accepted: 03/04/2019] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
|
26
|
Claus D, Radeke J, Zint M, Vogel A, Satravaha Y, Kilic F, Hibst R, Lapatki B. Generation of 3D digital models of the dental arches using optical scanning techniques. Semin Orthod 2018. [DOI: 10.1053/j.sodo.2018.10.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
|