1
|
Alshamrani AFA. Diagnostic Accuracy of Molecular Imaging Techniques for Detecting Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review. Diagnostics (Basel) 2024; 14:1315. [PMID: 39001206 PMCID: PMC11240585 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics14131315] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2024] [Revised: 06/17/2024] [Accepted: 06/19/2024] [Indexed: 07/16/2024] Open
Abstract
Molecular imaging modalities show valuable non-invasive techniques capable of precisely and selectively addressing molecular markers associated with prostate cancer (PCa). This systematic review provides an overview of imaging markers utilized in positron emission tomography (PET) methods, specifically focusing on the pathways and mediators involved in PCa. This systematic review aims to evaluate and analyse existing literature on the diagnostic accuracy of molecular imaging techniques for detecting PCa. The PubMed, EBSCO, ScienceDirect, and Web of Science databases were searched, identifying 32 studies that reported molecular imaging modalities for detecting PCa. Numerous imaging modalities and radiotracers were used to detect PCa, including 68Ga-prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET/computed tomography (CT), 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT, 18F-DCFPyL PET/MRI, 18F-choline PET/MRI, and 18F-fluoroethylcholine PET/MRI. Across 11 studies, radiolabelled 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT imaging had a pooled sensitivity of 80 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 35-93), specificity of 90 (95% CI: 71-98), and accuracy of 86 (95% CI: 64-96). The PSMA-ligand 68Ga-PET/CT showed good diagnostic performance and appears promising for detecting and staging PCa.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abdullah Fahad A Alshamrani
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology Technology, College of Applied Medical Sciences, Taibah University, Madinah 42353, Saudi Arabia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Georgiev A, Chervenkov L, Doykov M, Doykova K, Uchikov P, Tsvetkova S. Surveillance Value of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Maps: Multiparametric MRI in Active Surveillance of Prostate Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:1128. [PMID: 36831471 PMCID: PMC9953850 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15041128] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2022] [Revised: 01/25/2023] [Accepted: 02/06/2023] [Indexed: 02/12/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study aims to establish the value of apparent diffusion coefficient maps and other magnetic resonance sequences for active surveillance of prostate cancer. The study included 530 men with an average age of 66, who were under surveillance for prostate cancer. We have used multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging with subsequent transperineal biopsy (TPB) to verify the imaging findings. RESULTS We have observed a level of agreement of 67.30% between the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps, other magnetic resonance sequences, and the biopsy results. The sensitivity of the apparent diffusion coefficient is 97.14%, and the specificity is 37.50%. According to our data, apparent diffusion coefficient is the most accurate sequence, followed by diffusion imaging in prostate cancer detection. CONCLUSIONS Based on our findings we advocate that the apparent diffusion coefficient should be included as an essential part of magnetic resonance scanning protocols for prostate cancer in at least bi-parametric settings. The best option will be apparent diffusion coefficient combined with diffusion imaging and T2 sequences. Further large-scale prospective controlled studies are required to define the precise role of multiparametric and bi-parametric magnetic resonance in the active surveillance of prostate cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aleksandar Georgiev
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Medical Faculty, Medical University Plovdiv, Bul. Vasil Aprilov 15A, 4002 Plovdiv, Bulgaria
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Complex Oncology Center Plovdiv, ul. Pere Toshev 62, 4004 Plovdiv, Bulgaria
| | - Lyubomir Chervenkov
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Medical Faculty, Medical University Plovdiv, Bul. Vasil Aprilov 15A, 4002 Plovdiv, Bulgaria
- Research Complex for Translational Neuroscience, Medical University of Plovdiv, Bul. Vasil Aprilov 15A, 4002 Plovdiv, Bulgaria
| | - Mladen Doykov
- Department of Urology and General Medicine, Medical Faculty, Medical University Plovdiv, Bul. Vasil Aprilov 15A, 4002 Plovdiv, Bulgaria
| | - Katya Doykova
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Medical Faculty, Medical University Plovdiv, Bul. Vasil Aprilov 15A, 4002 Plovdiv, Bulgaria
| | - Petar Uchikov
- Department of Special Surgery, Medical Faculty, Medical University Plovdiv, Bul. Vasil Aprilov 15A, 4002 Plovdiv, Bulgaria
| | - Silvia Tsvetkova
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Medical Faculty, Medical University Plovdiv, Bul. Vasil Aprilov 15A, 4002 Plovdiv, Bulgaria
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Manafi-Farid R, Ranjbar S, Jamshidi Araghi Z, Pilz J, Schweighofer-Zwink G, Pirich C, Beheshti M. Molecular Imaging in Primary Staging of Prostate Cancer Patients: Current Aspects and Future Trends. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:5360. [PMID: 34771523 PMCID: PMC8582501 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13215360] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2021] [Revised: 10/17/2021] [Accepted: 10/19/2021] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Accurate primary staging is the cornerstone in all malignancies. Different morphological imaging modalities are employed in the evaluation of prostate cancer (PCa). Regardless of all developments in imaging, invasive histopathologic evaluation is still the standard method for the detection and staging of the primary PCa. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computed tomography (CT) play crucial roles; however, functional imaging provides additional valuable information, and it is gaining ever-growing acceptance in the management of PCa. Targeted imaging with different radiotracers has remarkably evolved in the past two decades. [111In]In-capromab pendetide scintigraphy was a new approach in the management of PCa. Afterwards, positron emission tomography (PET) tracers such as [11C/18F]choline and [11C]acetate were developed. Nevertheless, none found a role in the primary staging. By introduction of the highly sensitive small molecule prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET/CT, as well as recent developments in MRI and hybrid PET/MRI systems, non-invasive staging of PCa is being contemplated. Several studies investigated the role of these sophisticated modalities in the primary staging of PCa, showing promising results. Here, we recapitulate the role of targeted functional imaging. We briefly mention the most popular radiotracers, their diagnostic accuracy in the primary staging of PCa, and impact on patient management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Reyhaneh Manafi-Farid
- Research Center for Nuclear Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran 1411713135, Iran;
| | - Shaghayegh Ranjbar
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Division of Molecular Imaging and Theranostics, University Hospital Salzburg, Paracelsus Medical University, Muellner Hauptstrasse 48, 5020 Salzburg, Austria; (S.R.); (Z.J.A.); (J.P.); (G.S.-Z.); (C.P.)
| | - Zahra Jamshidi Araghi
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Division of Molecular Imaging and Theranostics, University Hospital Salzburg, Paracelsus Medical University, Muellner Hauptstrasse 48, 5020 Salzburg, Austria; (S.R.); (Z.J.A.); (J.P.); (G.S.-Z.); (C.P.)
| | - Julia Pilz
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Division of Molecular Imaging and Theranostics, University Hospital Salzburg, Paracelsus Medical University, Muellner Hauptstrasse 48, 5020 Salzburg, Austria; (S.R.); (Z.J.A.); (J.P.); (G.S.-Z.); (C.P.)
| | - Gregor Schweighofer-Zwink
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Division of Molecular Imaging and Theranostics, University Hospital Salzburg, Paracelsus Medical University, Muellner Hauptstrasse 48, 5020 Salzburg, Austria; (S.R.); (Z.J.A.); (J.P.); (G.S.-Z.); (C.P.)
| | - Christian Pirich
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Division of Molecular Imaging and Theranostics, University Hospital Salzburg, Paracelsus Medical University, Muellner Hauptstrasse 48, 5020 Salzburg, Austria; (S.R.); (Z.J.A.); (J.P.); (G.S.-Z.); (C.P.)
| | - Mohsen Beheshti
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Division of Molecular Imaging and Theranostics, University Hospital Salzburg, Paracelsus Medical University, Muellner Hauptstrasse 48, 5020 Salzburg, Austria; (S.R.); (Z.J.A.); (J.P.); (G.S.-Z.); (C.P.)
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Moradi F, Farolfi A, Fanti S, Iagaru A. Prostate cancer: Molecular imaging and MRI. Eur J Radiol 2021; 143:109893. [PMID: 34391061 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2021.109893] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2020] [Revised: 07/26/2021] [Accepted: 08/01/2021] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
The role of molecular imaging in initial evaluation of men with presumed or established diagnosis of prostate cancer and work up of biochemical recurrence and metastatic disease is rapidly evolving due to superior diagnostic performance compared to anatomic imaging. However, variable tumor biology and expression of transmembrane proteins or metabolic alterations poses a challenge. We review the evidence and controversies with emphasis on emerging PET radiopharmaceuticals and experience on clinical utility of PET/CT and PET/MRI in diagnosis and management of prostate cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Farshad Moradi
- Department of Radiology, Division of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
| | - Andrea Farolfi
- Nuclear Medicine Division, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Stefano Fanti
- Nuclear Medicine Division, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Andrei Iagaru
- Department of Radiology, Division of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Papp L, Spielvogel CP, Grubmüller B, Grahovac M, Krajnc D, Ecsedi B, Sareshgi RAM, Mohamad D, Hamboeck M, Rausch I, Mitterhauser M, Wadsak W, Haug AR, Kenner L, Mazal P, Susani M, Hartenbach S, Baltzer P, Helbich TH, Kramer G, Shariat SF, Beyer T, Hartenbach M, Hacker M. Supervised machine learning enables non-invasive lesion characterization in primary prostate cancer with [ 68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/MRI. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2021; 48:1795-1805. [PMID: 33341915 PMCID: PMC8113201 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-020-05140-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 64] [Impact Index Per Article: 21.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/09/2020] [Accepted: 11/29/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Risk classification of primary prostate cancer in clinical routine is mainly based on prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels, Gleason scores from biopsy samples, and tumor-nodes-metastasis (TNM) staging. This study aimed to investigate the diagnostic performance of positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging (PET/MRI) in vivo models for predicting low-vs-high lesion risk (LH) as well as biochemical recurrence (BCR) and overall patient risk (OPR) with machine learning. METHODS Fifty-two patients who underwent multi-parametric dual-tracer [18F]FMC and [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/MRI as well as radical prostatectomy between 2014 and 2015 were included as part of a single-center pilot to a randomized prospective trial (NCT02659527). Radiomics in combination with ensemble machine learning was applied including the [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET, the apparent diffusion coefficient, and the transverse relaxation time-weighted MRI scans of each patient to establish a low-vs-high risk lesion prediction model (MLH). Furthermore, MBCR and MOPR predictive model schemes were built by combining MLH, PSA, and clinical stage values of patients. Performance evaluation of the established models was performed with 1000-fold Monte Carlo (MC) cross-validation. Results were additionally compared to conventional [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 standardized uptake value (SUV) analyses. RESULTS The area under the receiver operator characteristic curve (AUC) of the MLH model (0.86) was higher than the AUC of the [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 SUVmax analysis (0.80). MC cross-validation revealed 89% and 91% accuracies with 0.90 and 0.94 AUCs for the MBCR and MOPR models respectively, while standard routine analysis based on PSA, biopsy Gleason score, and TNM staging resulted in 69% and 70% accuracies to predict BCR and OPR respectively. CONCLUSION Our results demonstrate the potential to enhance risk classification in primary prostate cancer patients built on PET/MRI radiomics and machine learning without biopsy sampling.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L Papp
- QIMP Team, Center for Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - C P Spielvogel
- Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Division of Nuclear Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria
- Christian Doppler Laboratory for Applied Metabolomics, Vienna, Austria
| | - B Grubmüller
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - M Grahovac
- Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Division of Nuclear Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria
| | - D Krajnc
- QIMP Team, Center for Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - B Ecsedi
- QIMP Team, Center for Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - R A M Sareshgi
- Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Division of Nuclear Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria
| | - D Mohamad
- Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Division of Nuclear Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria
| | - M Hamboeck
- Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Division of Nuclear Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria
| | - I Rausch
- QIMP Team, Center for Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - M Mitterhauser
- Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Division of Nuclear Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria
- Ludwig Boltzmann Institute Applied Diagnostics, Vienna, Austria
| | - W Wadsak
- Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Division of Nuclear Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria
| | - A R Haug
- Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Division of Nuclear Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria
- Christian Doppler Laboratory for Applied Metabolomics, Vienna, Austria
| | - L Kenner
- Christian Doppler Laboratory for Applied Metabolomics, Vienna, Austria
- Clinical Institute of Pathology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - P Mazal
- Clinical Institute of Pathology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - M Susani
- Clinical Institute of Pathology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | | | - P Baltzer
- Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Division of Common General and Pediatric Radiology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - T H Helbich
- Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Division of Common General and Pediatric Radiology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - G Kramer
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - S F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - T Beyer
- QIMP Team, Center for Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - M Hartenbach
- Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Division of Nuclear Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria
| | - M Hacker
- Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Division of Nuclear Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Checcucci E, Amparore D, De Luca S, Autorino R, Fiori C, Porpiglia F. Precision prostate cancer surgery: an overview of new technologies and techniques. MINERVA UROL NEFROL 2019; 71:487-501. [PMID: 30700084 DOI: 10.23736/s0393-2249.19.03365-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
Over the past few years several new technologies have become available for the management of PCa. The implementation of robotic surgery allowed an unprecedented refinement of surgical techniques, and the RARP procedure is constantly evolving. Nowadays research is mainly focused towards a "tailored" case-specific surgical approach that might allow to achieve PCa control while preserving urinary continence and erectile function. Therefore, in contemporary urology era, several new tools have been introduced to optimize surgical planning, to aid surgical navigation, and to refine surgical execution. In this non-systematic review emerges that a better imaging technique in the preoperative setting can facilitate surgical planning. Moreover, in the intraoperative setting, new tools for image-guided surgical navigation are promising and will allow real time understanding of surgical anatomy. In the next future, a more personalized approach for the minimally invasive surgical treatment of PCa will be available, and the achievement of the best oncological and functional outcomes will be obtained.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Enrico Checcucci
- Department of Urology, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Orbassano, Turin, Italy -
| | - Daniele Amparore
- Department of Urology, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Orbassano, Turin, Italy
| | - Stefano De Luca
- Department of Urology, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Orbassano, Turin, Italy
| | | | - Cristian Fiori
- Department of Urology, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Orbassano, Turin, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Grubmüller B, Baltzer P, Hartenbach S, D'Andrea D, Helbich TH, Haug AR, Goldner GM, Wadsak W, Pfaff S, Mitterhauser M, Balber T, Berroteran-Infante N, Grahovac M, Babich J, Seitz C, Kramer G, Susani M, Mazal P, Kenner L, Shariat SF, Hacker M, Hartenbach M. PSMA Ligand PET/MRI for Primary Prostate Cancer: Staging Performance and Clinical Impact. Clin Cancer Res 2018; 24:6300-6307. [PMID: 30139879 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-18-0768] [Citation(s) in RCA: 91] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2018] [Revised: 06/11/2018] [Accepted: 08/20/2018] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Primary staging of prostate cancer relies on modalities, which are limited. We evaluate simultaneous [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET (PSMA-PET)/MRI as a new diagnostic method for primary tumor-node-metastasis staging compared with histology and its impact on therapeutic decisions. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN We investigated 122 patients with PSMA-PET/MRI prior to planned radical prostatectomy (RP). Primary endpoint was the accuracy of PSMA-PET/MRI in tumor staging as compared with staging-relevant histology. In addition, a multidisciplinary team reassessed the initial therapeutic approach to evaluate its impact on the therapeutic management. RESULTS PSMA-PET/MRI correctly identified prostate cancer in 119 of 122 patients (97.5%). Eighty-one patients were treated with RP and pelvic lymphadenectomy. The accuracy for T staging was 82.5% [95% confidence interval (CI), 73-90; P < 0.001], for T2 stage was 85% (95% CI, 71-94; P < 0.001), for T3a stage was 79% (95% CI, 43-85; P < 0.001), for T3b stage was 94% (95% CI, 73-100; P < 0.001), and for N1 stage was 93% (95% CI, 84-98; P < 0.001). PSMA-PET/MRI changed the therapeutic strategy in 28.7% of the patients with either the onset of systemic therapy/radiotherapy (n = 16) or active surveillance (n = 19). CONCLUSIONS PSMA-PET/MRI can provide an accurate staging of newly diagnosed prostate cancer. In addition, treatment strategies were changed in almost a third of the patients due to the information of this hybrid imaging technique.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Pascal Baltzer
- Division of General and Pediatric Radiology, Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image Guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | | | - David D'Andrea
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Thomas H Helbich
- Division of General and Pediatric Radiology, Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image Guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Alexander R Haug
- Division of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image Guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Gregor M Goldner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Wolfgang Wadsak
- Division of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image Guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Center for Biomarker Research in Medicine, CBmed GmbH, Graz, Austria
| | - Sarah Pfaff
- Division of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image Guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Markus Mitterhauser
- Division of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image Guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Ludwig Boltzmann Institute for Applied Diagnostics, Vienna, Austria
| | - Theresa Balber
- Division of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image Guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Neydher Berroteran-Infante
- Division of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image Guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Marko Grahovac
- Division of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image Guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - John Babich
- Division of Radiopharmaceutical Sciences, Department of Radiology, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, New York
| | - Christian Seitz
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Gero Kramer
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Martin Susani
- Clinical Institute of Pathology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Peter Mazal
- Clinical Institute of Pathology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Lukas Kenner
- Clinical Institute of Pathology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Ludwig Boltzmann Institute for Cancer Research, Vienna, Austria.,Department of Experimental and Laboratory Animal Pathology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Institute of Laboratory Animal Pathology, University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, Texas.,Department of Urology and Division of Medical Oncology, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, New York
| | - Marcus Hacker
- Division of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image Guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Markus Hartenbach
- Division of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image Guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
MRI and 11C Acetate PET/CT for Prediction of Regional Lymph Node Metastasis in Newly Diagnosed Prostate Cancer. Radiol Oncol 2018. [PMID: 29520210 PMCID: PMC5839086 DOI: 10.2478/raon-2018-0001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/24/2023] Open
Abstract
Background The aim of the study was to examine the value of quantitative and qualitative MRI and 11C acetate PET/CT parameters in predicting regional lymph node (LN) metastasis of newly diagnosed prostate cancer (PCa). Patients and methods Patients with intermediate (n = 6) and high risk (n = 47) PCa underwent 3T MRI (40 patients) and 11C acetate PET/CT (53 patients) before extended pelvic LN dissection. For each patient the visually most suspicious LN was assessed for mean apparent diffusion coefficient (ADCmean), maximal standardized uptake value (SUVmax), size and shape and the primary tumour for T stage on MRI and ADCmean and SUVmax in the index lesion. The variables were analysed in simple and multiple logistic regression analysis. Results All variables, except ADCmean and SUVmax of the primary tumor, were independent predictors of LN metastasis. In multiple logistic regression analysis the best model was ADCmean in combintion with MRI T-stage where both were independent predictors of LN metastasis, this combination had an AUC of 0.81 which was higher than the AUC of 0.65 for LN ADCmean alone and the AUC of 0.69 for MRI T-stage alone. Conclusions Several quantitative and qualitative imaging parameters are predictive of regional LN metastasis in PCa. The combination of ADCmean in lymph nodes and T-stage on MRI was the best model in multiple logistic regression with increased predictive value compared to lymph node ADCmean and T-stage on MRI alone.
Collapse
|