Does repeated pleural culture increase the diagnostic yield of Mycobacterium tuberculosis from tuberculous pleural effusion in HIV-negative individuals?

Microbiological confirmation of tuberculous pleurisy with medical thoracoscopy: targeted pleural washing and pleural biopsy

Background

Due to the pauci-bacillary nature of tuberculous (TB) pleurisy, clinical diagnosis is common, but microbiological confirmation is necessary to determine drug resistance. This study aimed to investigate the diagnostic yield of medical thoracoscopy (MT) for microbiological confirmation of TB pleurisy.

Methods

Medical records of patients diagnosed as TB pleurisy with microbiological or histologic evidence who underwent MT between May 2015 and July 2023 at Incheon St. Mary's Hospital were retrospectively reviewed. Sensitivities of microbiological results [acid-fast bacilli (AFB) culture or TB-polymerase chain reaction (PCR)] of pre-MT pleural fluid and those of targeted pleural washing fluid and pleural tissues obtained during MT were compared. Difference in sensitivity was verified with McNemar's test.

Results

A total of 72 patients were enrolled. With pre-MT pleural fluid, sensitivities of AFB culture and TB PCR were 5.6% (4/72) and 1.4% (1/72), respectively. With targeted pleural washing fluid, sensitivities of AFB culture and TB-PCR were 23.6% (17/72) and 12.5% (9/72), respectively. With pleural tissues, sensitivities of AFB culture and TB-PCR were 18.1% (13/72) and 40.3% (29/72), respectively. MT showed an additional 27.8% [95% confidence interval (95% CI): 14.2-40.1%, P<0.001] of sensitivity gain in AFB culture and 40.3% (95% CI: 25.7-52.5%, P<0.001) of sensitivity gain in TB-PCR. With pleural washing, additional 19.4% (95% CI: 6.8-31.6%, P=0.001) of sensitivity gain in microbiological confirmation was identified, whereas additional 37.5% (95% CI: 22.6-50.2%, P<0.001) of sensitivity gain was identified with pleural biopsy.

Conclusions

With MT, 44.4% of additional sensitivity gain in microbiological confirmation of TB pleurisy was identified. This underscores the role of MT in the diagnosis of TB pleurisy.

Serosal membrane tuberculosis in Iran: A comprehensive review of evidences

Tuberculosis (TB) is among the most common cause of serositis. There are many uncertainties in diagnostic and therapeutic approach to serous membranes tuberculosis. Our aim in the present review is to discuss the regional facilities for timely diagnosis, rapid decision-making and appropriate treatment regarding to serous membranes tuberculosis; with emphasis on situation in Iran. A comprehensive literature searches about the status of serous membranes tuberculosis in Iran were performed in English databases including Google Scholar, Science Direct, Scopus, Pub Med, and Web of Sciences, Persian SID databases, between 2000 and 2021. The main findings of the present review are as follow: a) pleural tuberculosis is more common than pericardial or peritoneal tuberculosis. b) Clinical manifestations are non-specific and so non-diagnostic. c) Smear and culture, PCR and characteristic granulomatous reaction have been used for definitive TB diagnosis by physicians. d) With Adenosine Deaminase Assays and Interferon-Gamma Release Assays in mononuclear dominant fluid, a possible diagnosis of TB is proposed by experienced physicians in Iran. e) In area of endemic for tuberculosis including Iran, a possible diagnosis of TB is enough to begin empirical treatment. f) In patients with uncomplicated tuberculosis serositis, treatment is similar to pulmonary tuberculosis. First line drugs are prescribed unless evidence of MDR-TB is detected. g) The prevalence of drug resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) in Iran is between 1% and 6%, and are treated by empirical standardized treatment. h) It is not known whether adjuvant corticosteroids are effective in preventing long term complication. i) Surgery may be recommended for MDR-TB. Tamponade or constrictive pericarditis and intestinal obstruction. In conclusion, it is recommended to consider serosal tuberculosis in patients who have unknown mononuclear dominant effusion and prolonged constitutional symptoms. Experimental treatment with first line anti-TB drugs can be started based on possible diagnostic findings.

Diagnosis and Treatment of Pleural Effusion. Recommendations of the Spanish Society of Pulmonology and Thoracic Surgery. Update 2022

Pleural effusion (PE) is a common yet complex disease that requires specialized, multidisciplinary management. Recent advances, novel diagnostic techniques, and innovative patient-centered therapeutic proposals have prompted an update of the current guidelines. This document provides recommendations and protocols based on a critical review of the literature on the epidemiology, etiology, diagnosis, prognosis, and new therapeutic options in PE, and addresses some cost-effectiveness issues related to the main types of PE.

Use of Pleural Fluid Digital PCR Analysis to Improve the Diagnosis of Pleural Tuberculosis

The diagnosis of pleural tuberculosis (TB) remains difficult due to the paucity of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in pleural fluid (PF). This study aimed to improve pleural TB diagnosis using highly sensitive digital PCR (dPCR) technique. A total of 310 patients with evidence of PF were consecutively enrolled, 183 of whom suffered from pleural TB and 127 from non-TB. PF samples were prospectively collected and total DNA was extracted. The copy numbers of M. tuberculosis insertion sequence (IS) 6110 and IS1081 in DNA were quantified using dPCR. The overall area under the curve of IS6110-dPCR was greater than that of IS1081-dPCR (0.85 versus 0.79). PF IS6110 OR IS1081-dPCR (according to their cut-off values, "positive" was defined as either of them was positive, while "negative" was defined as both of them were negative) had higher sensitivity and equal specificity compared with single target-dPCR. The sensitivity of PF IS6110 OR IS1081-dPCR for total, definite, and probable pleural TB was 59.0% (95% CI = 51.5% to 66.2%), 72.8% (95% CI = 62.6% to 81.6%), and 45.1% (95% CI = 34.6% to 55.8%), respectively. Its specificity was 100% (95% CI = 97.1% to 100.0%). PF IS6110 OR IS1081-dPCR showed a higher sensitivity than smear microscopy (57.4% versus 7.1%), mycobacterial culture (55.3% versus 31.8%), and Xpert MTB/RIF (57.6% versus 23.0%). Long antituberculosis treatment time (>1 month) was found to be associated with negative dPCR results in pleural TB patients. This study indicates that PF IS6110 OR IS1081-dPCR is an accurate molecular assay, which is more sensitive than routine etiological tests and has the potential to enhance the definite diagnosis of pleural TB. IMPORTANCE Pleural TB is one of the most frequent causes of pleural effusion, especially in areas with high burden of TB. Due to the paucibacillary nature of the disease, the diagnostic sensitivities of all available bacteriological and molecular tests remain poor. There is an urgent need to develop new efficient methods. Digital PCR (dPCR) is the third generation of PCR that enables the exact quantification of trace nucleic acids in samples. This study evaluates the diagnostic performance of pleural fluid (PF) dPCR analysis for pleural TB, and shows that PF IS6110 OR IS1081-dPCR has a higher sensitivity than routine etiological tests such as smear microscopy, mycobacterial culture, and Xpert MTB/RIF. This work provides a new choice for improving the definite diagnosis of pleural TB.

Investigating the appropriate adenosine deaminase cutoff value for the diagnosis of tuberculous pleural effusion in a country with decreasing TB burden

As the burden of tuberculosis (TB) in South Korea decreases while that of malignancy increases with an aging society, the composition of etiology for pleural effusion is changing. The aim of this study was to investigate the diagnostic value of adenosine deaminase (ADA) for diagnosis of tuberculous pleural effusion (TPE) in this circumstance. Medical records of patients who underwent medical thoracoscopy from May 2015 to September 2020 in Incheon St. Mary Hospital, Korea were retrospectively reviewed. TPE was diagnosed if one of the following criteria was met: (1) granuloma in pleura, (2) positive TB polymerase chain reaction or culture in pleural fluid or tissue with non-specific pathologic findings in pleura, or (3) bacteriologically confirmed pulmonary TB with non-specific pathologic findings in pleura. A total of 292 patients, including 156 with malignant pleural effusion (MPE), 52 with TPE, and 84 with other benign effusion, were analyzed. Among 206 patients with lymphocyte dominant pleural effusion, the area under receiver characteristic curve of ADA for diagnosis of TPE was 0.971. The sensitivity and specificity of a current cutoff value of 40 IU/L were 1.00 and 0.61, respectively, whereas those of a raised cutoff value of 70 IU/L were 0.93 and 0.93, respectively. Among 54 patients with ADA levels of 40–70 IU/L, 30 (55.6%) patients were diagnosed as MPE, 21 (38.9%) as other benign effusion, and only 3 (5.6%) as TPE. Caution is needed in clinical diagnosis of TPE with current ADA cutoff value in countries with decreasing TB incidence, due to many false positive cases.

Tuberculous Pleural Effusion: Clinical Characteristics of 320 Patients

OBJECTIVES

To analyze the clinical and radiological characteristics and features of pleural fluid (PF) in patients with tuberculous pleural effusion (TPE).

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of TPEs treated in our clinic over the last 23years.

RESULTS

We included 320 patients with TPE (70% men; median age 33years). Mycobacterium tuberculosis was identified in the sputum or PF of 36% of the patients by microscopic examination, solid and liquid media cultures, or nucleic acid amplification tests. The greatest percentage of positive microbiological findings were associated with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) co-infection (OR: 3.27), and with the presence in PF of proteins <4g/dL (OR: 3.53), neutrophils >60% (OR: 3.23), and glucose <40mg/dL (OR: 3.17). Pleural adenosine deaminase <35U/L was associated with TPEs that occupied less than half of the hemithorax (OR: 6.36) and with PF lactate dehydrogenase levels <500U/L (OR: 8.09). Radiological pulmonary opacities (30%) were more common in TPE occupying less than half of the hemithorax (OR: 2.73), in bilateral TPE (OR: 4.48), and in older patients (OR: 1.02). Factors predicting mortality were: HIV co-infection (OR: 24), proteins in PF <5g/dL (OR: 10), and greater age (OR: 1.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with TPE and HIV co-infection and those with lower concentrations of proteins in PF had higher rates of positive microbiological results and death. Moreover, older patients had more pulmonary opacities and a higher incidence of death.

Biomarkers in the diagnosis of pleural diseases: a 2018 update

The use of biomarkers on pleural fluid (PF) specimens may assist the decision-making process and enhance clinical diagnostic pathways. Three paradigmatic examples are heart failure, tuberculosis and, particularly, malignancy. An elevated PF concentration of the amino-terminal fragment of probrain natriuretic peptide (>1500 pg/ml) is a hallmark of acute decompensated heart failure. Adenosine deaminase, interferon-γ and interleukin-27 are three valuable biomarkers for diagnosing tuberculous pleurisy, yet only the first has been firmly established in clinical practice. Diagnostic PF biomarkers for malignancy can be classified as soluble-protein based, immunocytochemical and nucleic-acid based. Soluble markers (e.g. carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), carbohydrate antigen 15-3, mesothelin) are only indicative of cancer, but not confirmatory. Immunocytochemical studies on PF cell blocks allow: (a) to distinguish mesothelioma from reactive mesothelial proliferations (e.g. loss of BAP1 nuclear expression, complemented by the demonstration of p16 deletion using fluorescence in situ hybridization, indicate mesothelioma); (b) to separate mesothelioma from adenocarcinoma (e.g. calretinin, CK 5/6, WT-1 and D2-40 are markers of mesothelioma, whereas CEA, EPCAM, TTF-1, napsin A, and claudin 4 are markers of carcinoma); and (c) to reveal tumor origin in pleural metastases of an unknown primary site (e.g. TTF-1 and napsin A for lung adenocarcinoma, p40 for squamous lung cancer, GATA3 and mammaglobin for breast cancer, or synaptophysin and chromogranin A for neuroendocrine tumors). Finally, PF may provide an adequate sample for analysis of molecular markers to guide patients with non-small cell lung cancer to appropriate targeted therapies. Molecular testing must include, at least, mutations of epidermal growth-factor receptor and BRAF V600E, translocations of rat osteosarcoma and anaplastic lymphoma kinase, and expression of programmed death ligand 1.