Fever as an initial manifestation of spondyloarthritis: A retrospective study

Systemic auto-inflammatory manifestations in patients with spondyloarthritis

OBJECTIVES

(1) characterizing a group of spondyloarthritis (SpA) patients with systemic auto-inflammatory symptoms (S-SpA); (2) comparing SpA features with and without auto-inflammatory symptoms; (3) comparing the auto-inflammatory features of S-SpA and Still's disease (SD).

METHODS

Retrospective observational study. Clinical data of adult and pediatric patients with S-SpA, SD or SpA were collected retrospectively and analyzed.

RESULTS

Forty-one subjects with S-SpA, 39 with SD and 42 with SpA were enrolled. The median latency between systemic and articular manifestations in S-SpA was 4.4 (IQR: 7.2) years. S-SpA and SpA had similar frequency of peripheral arthritis and enthesitis (N.S.), while tenosynovitis was more frequent (P=0.01) and uveitis less frequent (P<0.01) in S-SpA. MRI showed signs of sacroiliac inflammation and damage in both S-SpA and SpA equally (N.S.). S-SpA patients had less corner inflammatory lesions (P<0.05) and inflammation at the facet joints (P<0.01), more interspinous enthesitis (P=0.01) and inter-apophyseal capsulitis (P<0.01). Compared to SD, S-SpA patients had lower-grade fever (P<0.01), less rash (P<0.01) and weight loss (P<0.05), but more pharyngitis (P<0.01), gastrointestinal symptoms (P<0.01) and chest pain (P<0.05). ESR, CRP, WBC, ANC, LDH tested higher in SD (P<0.01). Resolution of systemic symptoms was less frequent in S-SpA than SD on corticosteroid (P<0.01) and methotrexate (P<0.05) treatment. When considering all SD patients, a complete response to corticosteroids in the systemic phase significantly reduced the likelihood of developing SpA (OR=0.06, coefficient -2.87 [CI: -5.0 to -0.8]).

CONCLUSIONS

SpA should be actively investigated in patients with auto-inflammatory manifestations, including undifferentiated auto-inflammatory disease and SD.

[Fever in rheumatological diseases]

Fever is a frequent and important symptom in patients with rheumatological diseases and can be an expression of activity of the underlying rheumatological disease. There is great variability in the incidence of fever as a symptom of the disease between individual diseases. The growing understanding of the molecular signatures of the diseases can help to explain these discrepancies: A genetic overactivation of potently pyrogenic cytokines is the reason why fever is nearly always present in autoinflammatory syndromes. In contrast, fever is less common in polyarthritis and myositis and mostly limited to severe courses of disease. In the diagnostic work-up of fever, frequent differential diagnoses, such as infections, malignancies, side effects of drugs and hypersensitivity reactions should be considered. This article provides an overview of the physiology of the development of fever, describes the relevance of fever in individual rheumatological diseases and proposes a workflow for the clinical clarification of rheumatological patients who present with fever.

Peripheral Spondyloarthritis Presenting with Fever and Severe Systemic Inflammatory Response Mimicking Infection: A Case Series and Literature Review

Objective

To describe four peripheral spondyloarthritis patients presenting with fever and severe systemic inflammatory response mimicking infection.

Methods

Between 2017 and 2019, four patients with the final diagnosis of peripheral spondyloarthritis had atypical presentation of fever and severe systemic inflammatory response requiring hospital admission and extensive workup.

Results

We reported four patients who were admitted to the hospital for fever and arthritis. They all had laboratory tests of the severe systemic inflammatory response (leukocytosis, thrombocytosis, high ESR, and high CRP) concerning infection. They underwent extensive workup for infectious causes, including septic arthritis, which came back negative. Other rheumatic diseases that are known to present with fever such as adult-onset Still's disease, reactive arthritis, and crystal arthritis were all excluded. The final diagnosis of spondyloarthritis was made during their follow-up: three patients with peripheral spondyloarthritis and one with psoriatic arthritis. All patients received conventional DMARDs (methotrexate and sulfasalazine) and two patients received tumor necrosis factor inhibitors in addition to conventional DMARDs to control their disease.

Conclusion

We observed a subgroup of peripheral spondyloarthritis patients presenting with fever and severe systemic inflammatory response requiring hospitalization. Recognition of this subgroup is important and should be considered once an infection is ruled out.

Glucocorticoids in spondyloarthritis-systematic review and real-world analysis

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to identify and summarize the efficacy and safety of systemic glucocorticoids (GCs) and local injections of GC in SpA.

METHODS

PubMed (Medline) and EMBASE were searched with pre-defined keywords for relevant articles in English reporting randomized controlled trials (RCTs), non-randomized interventional studies and non-randomized observational studies of the efficacy of GC in SpA, with five or more patients, for inclusion in a systematic literature review. Local injections of GC included IA and entheseal injections, but excluded SI joint injections.

RESULTS

Out of 9657 records identified, there were 14 studies on the use of systemic GCs in SpA (364 patients), including two RCTs of oral prednisolone. On pooling data from two placebo-controlled RCTs (≤24 weeks), BASDAI 50 was 4.2 times more likely (95% CI: 1.5, 11.5) and Ankylosing Spondylitis Assessment Group (ASAS) 20 was twice more likely (95% CI: 1.1, 3.64) to occur in patients on high-dose oral prednisolone (± taper). Pulsed GCs led to dramatic improvements that lasted a few weeks to a few months. There were no deaths or major adverse events. There were 10 studies (560 patients) on local GCs in SpA. IA injection was effective in achieving a sustained response in 51.5-90% of joints at 6 months. Entheseal injections led to reduced pain and improved US parameters.

CONCLUSION

There were limited studies on either systemic or local injections of GCs in SpA. However, there was good evidence of efficacy with the use of high-dose systemic GCs in the short term (≤6 months) in SpA. Both IA and entheseal injections seemed safe and effective.

Ankylosing spondylitis presenting with enthesitis at an uncommon site and fever of unknown origin

A 58-year-old man presented with a 2-month history of arthralgia and bilateral temporal region pain, and a 1-month history of fever. He had had refractory neck pain since his 20s. Reduced cervical and lumbar mobility was observed. Radiographs of cervical and thoracic vertebrae disclosed syndesmophytes. Pelvic radiographs showed sclerosis in the right sacroiliac joint and ankylosis in the left sacroiliac joint. MRI with contrast enhancement showed enthesitis in the upper extremities and enhancement in the bilateral temporal muscle, which indicated enthesitis of temporal muscle. He was diagnosed with ankylosing spondylitis based on the limitation in mobility of the lumbar spine and radiographic findings. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report describing enthesitis of the temporal muscle. This case highlights that ankylosing spondylitis can be accompanied with enthesitis at the temporal muscle and fever of unknown origin at the initial presentation.