Variability in objective and subjective measures affects baseline values in studies of patients with COPD

Activity monitoring of stroke patients by physiotherapist and caregivers in a hospital setting: A pilot study

Background

Activity monitoring is a necessary technique to ensure stroke survivors' activity levels in the hospital are within optimal levels as this is important for enhanced motor recovery. However, this could be time-consuming for healthcare professionals like physiotherapists. Activity monitoring by caregivers could be an alternate option. Therefore, our aim was to compare the activity monitoring of stroke survivors by caregivers and physiotherapists during early phase in a hospital setting.

Methods

An observation study was carried out in the neuroscience ward in a tertiary care hospital among 17 stroke survivors. Physiotherapist and caregivers were instructed to use an activity log chart that was developed during previous research conducted by the same authors for observing the activities performed by the patients every 15 minutes from 8 AM to 5 PM across one day. Data collected were analysed using Stata 15. Kappa statistics were carried out to determine the agreement of the observations between the two raters.

Results

A total of 10 male and seven female caregivers of stroke survivors with a mean age of 40.11 ± 9.2 years and a trained physiotherapist participated in the study. A total of 272 observations of caregivers were in agreement with that of the physiotherapist. Inter-rater Kappa statistics showed 60% agreement between the physiotherapist and the caregivers (p<0.05).

Conclusions

There was moderate agreement between the physiotherapist and caregiver for activity monitoring of stroke survivors. This suggests behavioural mapping by caregivers may be a potential alternative solution in healthcare settings.

African American race is associated with worse sleep quality in heavy smokers

STUDY OBJECTIVES

To examine the association of self-identified race with sleep quality in heavy smokers.

METHODS

We studied baseline data from 1965 non-Hispanic White and 462 African American participants from SPIROMICS with ≥ 20 pack-years smoking history. We first examined the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index's (PSQI) internal consistency and item-total correlation in a population with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. We then used staged multivariable regression to investigate the association of race and sleep quality as measured by the PSQI) The first model included demographics, the second added measures of health status, and the third, indicators of socioeconomic status. We next explored the correlation between sleep quality with 6-minute walk distance and St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire score as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease-relevant outcomes. We tested for interactions between self-identified race and the most important determinants of sleep quality in our conceptual model.

RESULTS

We found that the PSQI had good internal consistency and item-total correlation in our study population of heavy smokers with and without chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. African American race was associated with increased PSQI in univariable analysis and after adjustment for demographics, health status, and socioenvironmental exposures (P = .02; 0.44 95%CI: .06 to .83). Increased PSQI was associated with higher postbronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 second and lower household income, higher depressive symptoms, and female sex. We identified an interaction wherein depressive symptoms had a greater impact on PSQI score for non-Hispanic White than African American participants (P for interaction = .01).

CONCLUSIONS

In heavy smokers, self-reported African American race is independently associated with worse sleep quality.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

Registry: ClinicalTrials.gov; Name: Study of COPD Subgroups and Biomarkers (SPIROMICS); URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01969344; Identifier: NCT01969344.

CITATION

Baugh AD, Acho M, Arhin A, et al. African American race is associated with worse sleep quality in heavy smokers. J Clin Sleep Med. 2023;19(8):1523-1532.

Longitudinal Follow-Up of Participants With Tobacco Exposure and Preserved Spirometry

Importance

People who smoked cigarettes may experience respiratory symptoms without spirometric airflow obstruction. These individuals are typically excluded from chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) trials and lack evidence-based therapies.

Objective

To define the natural history of persons with tobacco exposure and preserved spirometry (TEPS) and symptoms (symptomatic TEPS).

Design, Setting, and Participants

SPIROMICS II was an extension of SPIROMICS I, a multicenter study of persons aged 40 to 80 years who smoked cigarettes (>20 pack-years) with or without COPD and controls without tobacco exposure or airflow obstruction. Participants were enrolled in SPIROMICS I and II from November 10, 2010, through July 31, 2015, and followed up through July 31, 2021.

Exposures

Participants in SPIROMICS I underwent spirometry, 6-minute walk distance testing, assessment of respiratory symptoms, and computed tomography of the chest at yearly visits for 3 to 4 years. Participants in SPIROMICS II had 1 additional in-person visit 5 to 7 years after enrollment in SPIROMICS I. Respiratory symptoms were assessed with the COPD Assessment Test (range, 0 to 40; higher scores indicate more severe symptoms). Participants with symptomatic TEPS had normal spirometry (postbronchodilator ratio of forced expiratory volume in the first second [FEV1] to forced vital capacity >0.70) and COPD Assessment Test scores of 10 or greater. Participants with asymptomatic TEPS had normal spirometry and COPD Assessment Test scores of less than 10. Patient-reported respiratory symptoms and exacerbations were assessed every 4 months via phone calls.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary outcome was assessment for accelerated decline in lung function (FEV1) in participants with symptomatic TEPS vs asymptomatic TEPS. Secondary outcomes included development of COPD defined by spirometry, respiratory symptoms, rates of respiratory exacerbations, and progression of computed tomographic-defined airway wall thickening or emphysema.

Results

Of 1397 study participants, 226 had symptomatic TEPS (mean age, 60.1 [SD, 9.8] years; 134 were women [59%]) and 269 had asymptomatic TEPS (mean age, 63.1 [SD, 9.1] years; 134 were women [50%]). At a median follow-up of 5.76 years, the decline in FEV1 was -31.3 mL/y for participants with symptomatic TEPS vs -38.8 mL/y for those with asymptomatic TEPS (between-group difference, -7.5 mL/y [95% CI, -16.6 to 1.6 mL/y]). The cumulative incidence of COPD was 33.0% among participants with symptomatic TEPS vs 31.6% among those with asymptomatic TEPS (hazard ratio, 1.05 [95% CI, 0.76 to 1.46]). Participants with symptomatic TEPS had significantly more respiratory exacerbations than those with asymptomatic TEPS (0.23 vs 0.08 exacerbations per person-year, respectively; rate ratio, 2.38 [95% CI, 1.71 to 3.31], P < .001).

Conclusions and Relevance

Participants with symptomatic TEPS did not have accelerated rates of decline in FEV1 or increased incidence of COPD vs those with asymptomatic TEPS, but participants with symptomatic TEPS did experience significantly more respiratory exacerbations over a median follow-up of 5.8 years.

Clinical Implications of Low Absolute Blood Eosinophil Count in the SPIROMICS COPD Cohort

BACKGROUND

The Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) considers blood eosinophil counts < 100 cells/μL (BEC≤100) in people with COPD to predict poor inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) responsiveness. However, the BEC≤100 phenotype is inadequately characterized, especially in advanced COPD.

RESEARCH QUESTION

Are there differences between GOLD group D patients with high BEC and those with low BEC regarding baseline characteristics and longitudinal outcomes?

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

We used multivariable mixed models and logistic regression to contrast clinical characteristics and outcomes of BEC≤100 vs BEC > 100 (BEC100+) in all subjects with COPD (n = 1,414) and GOLD group D subjects (n = 185) not receiving ICS.

RESULTS

We identified n = 485 with BEC≤100 (n = 61 GOLD group D) and n = 929 people with BEC100+ (n = 124 GOLD group D). BEC≤100 status was stable at 6 weeks and approximately 52 weeks (intraclass correlations of 0.78 and 0.71, respectively). Compared with BEC100+, BEC≤100 comprised more women, with greater current smoking, and less frequent childhood asthma. Among all analyzed participants, the two BEC-defined subsets showed similar rates of lung function decline (mean slope, BEC≤100 vs BEC100+, -50 vs -39 mL/y; P = .140), exacerbations (0.40 vs 0.36/y; P = .098), subsequent ICS initiation (2.5% vs 4.4%; P = .071), and mortality (7.8% vs 8.4%; P = .715). However, in GOLD group D, people with BEC≤100 showed higher exacerbation rates within 365 days of enrollment (0.62 vs 0.33/y; P = .002) and total follow-up (1.16 vs 0.83/y; P = .014). They also had greater lung function decline (mean slope of -68 mL/y vs -23 mL/y; P = .036) and had greater emphysema at baseline (voxels < 950 Hounsfield units at total lung capacity of 7.46% vs 4.61%; P = .029).

INTERPRETATION

In non-ICS-treated GOLD group D COPD, people with BEC≤100 had more baseline emphysema, prospective exacerbations, and lung function decline. Our analysis has identified a particularly vulnerable subpopulation of people with COPD, suggesting the need for studies focused specifically on their therapeutic treatment.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov; No.: NCT01969344; URL: www.

CLINICALTRIALS

gov.

Expiratory flow limitation in a cohort of highly symptomatic COPD patients

The question addressed by the study

Small airway collapse during expiration, known as expiratory flow limitation (EFL), can be detected using oscillometry and is associated with worse clinical outcomes in COPD. This study investigated the prevalence of EFL in a cohort of highly symptomatic patients, evaluated clinical and lung function characteristics of patients with EFL and studied the repeatability of EFL over 6 months.

Materials/patients and methods

70 patients were recruited. Clinical characteristics and lung function metrics were collected at baseline and 6 months. Impulse oscillometry was used to detect the presence of EFL. Patients were defined as EFL^High (change in reactance measured at 5 Hz (ΔX₅) ≥0.28 kPa·L⁻¹·s⁻¹); EFL^Intermediate (ΔX₅ 0.1–0.27 kPa·L⁻¹·s⁻¹) and EFL^None (ΔX₅ <0.1 kPa·L⁻¹·s⁻¹).

Results

EFL^High was present in 47.8% of patients at baseline. ΔX₅ showed excellent repeatability over 6 months (ρ=0.78, p<0.0001, intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) 0.88), with the best repeatability observed in EFL^None and EFL^High patients (ICC 0.77 and 0.65, respectively). Compared to EFL^None patients, EFL^High had a higher body mass index, worse health-related quality of life and increased peripheral airway resistance. EFL^Intermediate was more variable over time with less severe physiological impairment.

Answer to the question

Overall, these data indicate that EFL^High is a common, and relatively stable, component of disease pathophysiology in highly symptomatic COPD patients. EFL^High was also associated with worse quality of life and obesity.

EFL, defined by oscillometry, is a common and relatively stable component of disease pathophysiology in highly symptomatic COPD patients. EFL is associated with worse airflow obstruction, small airway resistance, worse quality of life and obesity.https://bit.ly/3AMRjjL

Forced Expiratory Flow at 25%-75% Links COPD Physiology to Emphysema and Disease Severity in the SPIROMICS Cohort

BACKGROUND

Forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV₁) is central to the diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) but is imprecise in classifying disease burden. We examined the potential of the maximal mid-expiratory flow rate (forced expiratory flow rate between 25% and 75% [FEF_25%-75%]) as an additional tool for characterizing pathophysiology in COPD.

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether FEF_25%-75% helps predict clinical and radiographic abnormalities in COPD.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

The SubPopulations and InteRediate Outcome Measures In COPD Study (SPIROMICS) enrolled a prospective cohort of 2978 nonsmokers and ever-smokers, with and without COPD, to identify phenotypes and intermediate markers of disease progression. We used baseline data from 2771 ever-smokers from the SPIROMICS cohort to identify associations between percent predicted FEF_25%-75% (%predFEF_25%-75%) and both clinical markers and computed tomography (CT) findings of smoking-related lung disease.

RESULTS

Lower %predFEF_25-75% was associated with more severe disease, manifested radiographically by increased functional small airways disease, emphysema (most notably with homogeneous distribution), CT-measured residual volume, total lung capacity (TLC), and airway wall thickness, and clinically by increased symptoms, decreased 6-minute walk distance, and increased bronchodilator responsiveness (BDR). A lower %predFEF_25-75% remained significantly associated with increased emphysema, functional small airways disease, TLC, and BDR after adjustment for FEV₁ or forced vital capacity (FVC).

INTERPRETATION

The %predFEF_25-75% provides additional information about disease manifestation beyond FEV₁. These associations may reflect loss of elastic recoil and air trapping from emphysema and intrinsic small airways disease. Thus, %predFEF_25-75% helps link the anatomic pathology and deranged physiology of COPD.

Significance of FEV3/FEV6 in recognition of early airway disease in smokers at risk of development of COPD: Analysis of the SPIROMICS cohort

BACKGROUND

Small airways are known to be affected early in the course of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD); however, traditional spirometric indices may not accurately identify small airways disease.

RESEARCH QUESTION

Can FEV₃/FEV₆ identify early airflow abnormalities and predict future clinically important respiratory-related outcomes, including development of COPD?

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

We included eight hundred thirty-two current and former smokers with post-bronchodilator FEV₁/FVC ≥0.7 from the SPIROMICS cohort. Participants were classified as having a reduced pre-bronchodilator FEV₃/FEV₆ based on lower limit of normal (LLN) values. Repeatability analysis was performed for FEV₃ and FEV₆. Regression modeling was used to evaluate the relationship between baseline FEV₃/FEV₆ and outcome measures including functional small airways disease on thoracic imaging and respiratory exacerbations. Interval censored analysis was used to assess progression to COPD.

RESULTS

FEV₃/FEV₆ <LLN at baseline, defined as reduced compared to FEV₃/FEV₆ ≥LLN, was associated with lower FEV₁, poorer health status (St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire score), more emphysema, and more functional small airways disease on quantitative imaging. FEV₃ and FEV₆ showed excellent agreement between repeat measurements. A reduced FEV₃/FEV₆ was associated with increased odds of a severe respiratory exacerbation within the first year of follow-up and decreased time to first exacerbation. A low FEV₃/FEV₆ was also associated with development of COPD by spirometry (post-bronchodilator FEV₁/FVC <0.7) during study follow-up.

INTERPRETATION

FEV₃/FEV₆ is a routinely available and repeatable spirometric index which can be useful in the evaluation of early airflow obstruction in current and former smokers without COPD. A reduced FEV₃/FEV₆ can identify those at risk for future development of COPD and respiratory exacerbations.

Reliability of impulse oscillometry parameters in healthy children and in children with cystic fibrosis

INTRODUCTION & AIMS

Impulse oscillometry system (IOS) is an instrument developed to evaluate the mechanical lung properties. It has been reported that to analyse the exam in a proper way it is necessary to carry out more than one measure. However, studies addressing the standardisation are still scarce. The objective was to determine within trial reliability of three measures in IOS parameters in healthy children and children with cystic fibrosis (CF).

METHOD

Weight, height, body mass index, forced spirometric and the oscillometric parameters (resistance, respiratory impedance, respiratory reactance and resonance frequency) data were collected, in a way that all participants performed three IOS measures. To evaluate, the reproducibility was used the intraclass correlation coefficient [two-way mixed model, absolute agreement definition, ICC]. The response stability was appraised using the standard error of measurements (SEM) in three repetitions of the IOS in the healthy children group (HCG) and in the cystic fibrosis group (CFG).

RESULTS

About 95 subjects participated, in each group with a mean age of 10.89 ± 2.21 years old in the HCG and 9.73 ± 2.43 years old in the CFG, having been 41 and 43 boys and 54 and 52 girls, in the respectively group. In both groups, all IOS parameters evaluated in the three measures presented an ICC of 0.9, which is a high reproducibility.

CONCLUSION

The IOS parameters are reproducible for healthy children and CF children in three measures. However, according to the population studied, the performance of only one measure is sufficient to assess respiratory mechanics, whereas the SEM were low, except for Fres, in both groups.

Defining Chronic Mucus Hypersecretion Using the CAT in the SPIROMICS Cohort

Background

Chronic cough and phlegm are frequently reported chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) symptoms. Prior research classified chronic mucus hypersecretion (CMH) based on the presence of these symptoms for ≥3 months, called chronic bronchitis (CB) if respiratory infection symptoms were present for 1–2 years (Medical Research Council [MRC] definition). We explored whether the COPD Assessment Test (CAT), a simple measure developed for routine clinical use, captures CMH populations and outcomes similarly to MRC and St. George’s Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) definitions.

Methods

We identified CMH in the SPIROMICS COPD cohort using (a) MRC definitions, (b) SGRQ questions for cough and phlegm (both as most/several days a week), and (c) CAT cough and phlegm questions. We determined optimal cut-points for CAT items and described exacerbation frequencies for different CMH definitions. Moderate exacerbations required a new prescription for antibiotics/oral corticosteroids or emergency department visit; severe exacerbations required hospitalization. Results were stratified by smoking status.

Results

In a population of 1431 participants (57% male; mean FEV₁% predicted 61%), 47% and 49% of evaluable participants had SGRQ- or CAT-defined CMH, respectively. A cut-point of ≥2 for cough and phlegm items defined CMH in CAT. Among SGRQ-CMH+ participants, 80% were also defined as CMH+ by the CAT. CMH+ participants were more likely to be current smokers. A higher exacerbation frequency was observed for presence of CMH+ versus CMH− in the year prior to baseline for all CMH definitions; this trend continued across 3 years of follow-up, regardless of smoking status.

Conclusion

Items from the CAT identified SGRQ-defined CMH, a frequent COPD trait that correlated with exacerbation frequency. The CAT is a short, simple questionnaire and a potentially valuable tool for telemedicine or real-world trials. CAT-based CMH is a novel approach for identifying clinically important characteristics in COPD that can be ascertained in these settings.

Placebo Effects in Clinical Trials Evaluating Patients with Uncontrolled Persistent Asthma

Rationale: Patients with uncontrolled, persistent asthma can show substantial health improvements when administered placebo.Objectives: We analyzed five randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trials that assessed subjects with uncontrolled, persistent asthma to determine the magnitudes of placebo effects across different clinical outcomes.Methods: Placebo effects for objective asthma-related outcomes, healthcare utilization outcomes, and patient-reported outcomes were estimated, with adjustments for regression to the mean.Results: Statistically significant improvements in all clinical outcomes were seen in patients randomized to placebo across all trials. Placebo effects were largest for healthcare utilization outcomes, including exacerbations (median reduction, 0.44 events/yr; 31% risk reduction; range, 19-56%), emergency department visits (median reduction, 0.19 events/yr; 50% risk reduction; range, 36-82%), and hospitalizations for asthma (median reduction, 0.26 events/yr; 66% risk reduction; range, 61-74%). Patient-reported outcomes exhibited intermediate placebo effects. Median improvements in the Asthma Control Questionnaire and St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire scores in placebo-treated patients were 0.53 units (25% improvement; range, 18-30%) and 8.3 units (19.5% improvement; range 19-20%), respectively. Forced expiratory volume in 1 second exhibited the smallest relative placebo effects (median increase, 77 ml; 4.2% improvement; range, 3.4-4.9%). Subgroup analyses did not reveal patient subgroups that were more susceptible to placebo effects. Pre- and postrandomization counts for asthma exacerbations showed patterns consistent with the expected negative binomial distribution except for significant departures in prerandomization exacerbations for two trials.Conclusions: Patients with uncontrolled asthma derived consistent benefit from randomization to placebo. Observed placebo effects may represent beneficial effects of both sham therapy and a structured asthma regimen dictated by the study protocol. In the case of healthcare utilization outcomes, recall errors in self-reported healthcare events may have introduced biases that inflated placebo effect estimates.

CXCR2 antagonist for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with chronic mucus hypersecretion: a phase 2b trial

Background

Oral CXC chemokine receptor 2 (CXCR2) antagonists have been shown to inhibit neutrophil migration and activation in the lung in preclinical and human models of neutrophilic airway inflammation. A previous study with danirixin, a reversible CXCR2 antagonist, demonstrated a trend for improved respiratory symptoms and health status in patients with COPD.

Methods

This 26-week, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase IIb study enrolled symptomatic patients with mild-to-moderate COPD at risk for exacerbations. Patients received danirixin 5, 10, 25, 35 or 50 mg twice daily or placebo in addition to standard of care. Primary end-points were the dose response of danirixin compared with placebo on the incidence and severity of respiratory symptoms (Evaluating Respiratory Symptoms in COPD [E-RS:COPD] scores) and safety. Secondary end-points included the incidence of moderate-severe exacerbations, health status (COPD Assessment test, CAT) and health-related quality of life HRQoL (St. George Respiratory Questionnaire-COPD, SGRQ-C).

Results

A total of 614 participants were randomized to treatment. There were no improvements in E-RS:COPD, CAT or SGRQ-C scores in participants treated with any dose of danirixin compared to placebo; a larger than expected placebo effect was observed. There was an increased incidence of exacerbation in the danirixin-treated groups and an increased number of pneumonias in participants treated with danirixin 50 mg.

Conclusions

The robust placebo and study effects prohibited any conclusions on the efficacy of danirixin. However, the absence of a clear efficacy benefit and the observed increase in exacerbations in danirixin-treated groups suggests an unfavorable benefit-risk profile in patients with COPD.

Trial registration

This study was registered with clinicaltrials.gov, NCT03034967.

Minimal Clinically Important Differences for Patient-Reported Outcome Measures of Fatigue in Patients With COPD Following Pulmonary Rehabilitation

BACKGROUND

Fatigue is a burdensome and prevailing symptom in patients with COPD. Pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) improves fatigue; however, interpreting when such improvement is clinically relevant is challenging. Minimal clinically important differences (MCIDs) for instruments assessing fatigue are warranted to better tailor PR and guide clinical decisions.

RESEARCH QUESTION

This study estimated MCIDs for the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue Subscale (FACIT-FS), the modified FACIT-FS, and the Checklist Individual Strength-Fatigue Subscale in patients with COPD following PR.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

Data from patients with COPD who completed a 12-week community-based PR program were used to compute the MCIDs. The pooled MCID was estimated by calculating the arithmetic weighted mean, resulting from the combination of anchor-based (weight, two-thirds) and distribution-based (weight, one-third) methods. Anchors were patients' and physiotherapists' Global Rating of Change Scale, COPD Assessment Test, St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ), and exacerbations. To estimate MCIDs, we used mean change, receiver-operating characteristic curves, and linear regression analysis for anchor-based approaches, and 0.5 × SD, SE of measurement, 1.96 × SE of measurement, and minimal detectable change for distribution-based approaches.

RESULTS

Fifty-three patients with COPD (79% male, 68.4 ± 7.6 years of age, and FEV₁ 48.7 ± 17.4% predicted) were included in the analysis. Exacerbations and the SGRQ-impact and the SGRQ-total scores fulfilled the requirements to be used as anchors. Pooled MCIDs were 4.7 for FACIT-FS, 3.8 for the modified FACIT-FS, and 9.3 for the Checklist Individual Strength-Fatigue Subscale.

INTRPRETATION

The MCIDs proposed in this study can be used by different stakeholders to interpret PR effectiveness.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov; No.: NCT03799666; URL: www.clinicaltrials.gov.

Clinical Significance of Bronchodilator Responsiveness Evaluated by Forced Vital Capacity in COPD: SPIROMICS Cohort Analysis

Objective

Bronchodilator responsiveness (BDR) is prevalent in COPD, but its clinical implications remain unclear. We explored the significance of BDR, defined by post-bronchodilator change in FEV₁ (BDR_FEV1) as a measure reflecting the change in flow and in FVC (BDR_FVC) reflecting the change in volume.

Methods

We analyzed 2974 participants from a multicenter observational study designed to identify varying COPD phenotypes (SPIROMICS). We evaluated the association of BDR with baseline clinical characteristics, rate of prospective exacerbations and mortality using negative binomial regression and Cox proportional hazards models.

Results

A majority of COPD participants exhibited BDR (52.7%). BDR_FEV1 occurred more often in earlier stages of COPD, while BDR_FVC occurred more frequently in more advanced disease. When defined by increases in either FEV₁ or FVC, BDR was associated with a self-reported history of asthma, but not with blood eosinophil counts. BDR_FVC was more prevalent in subjects with greater emphysema and small airway disease on CT. In a univariate analysis, BDR_FVC was associated with increased exacerbations and mortality, although no significance was found in a model adjusted for post-bronchodilator FEV₁.

Conclusion

With advanced airflow obstruction in COPD, BDR_FVC is more prevalent in comparison to BDR_FEV1 and correlates with the extent of emphysema and degree of small airway disease. Since these associations appear to be related to the impairment of FEV₁, BDR_FVC itself does not define a distinct phenotype nor can it be more predictive of outcomes, but it can offer additional insights into the pathophysiologic mechanism in advanced COPD.

Clinical trials registration

ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01969344T4.

Spirometric indices of early airflow impairment in individuals at risk of developing COPD: Spirometry beyond FEV1/FVC

Spirometry is the current gold standard for diagnosing and monitoring the progression of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD). However, many current and former smokers who do not meet established spirometric criteria for the diagnosis of this disease have symptoms and clinical courses similar to those with diagnosed COPD. Large longitudinal observational studies following individuals at risk of developing COPD offer us additional insight into spirometric patterns of disease development and progression. Analysis of forced expiratory maneuver changes over time may allow us to better understand early changes predictive of progressive disease. This review discusses the theoretical ability of spirometry to capture fine pathophysiologic changes in early airway disease, highlights the shortcomings of current diagnostic criteria, and reviews existing evidence for spirometric measures which may be used to better detect early airflow impairment.

Revealing Methodological Challenges in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Studies Assessing Comorbidities: A Narrative Review

Beyond respiratory impairment, patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) often suffer from comorbidities which are associated with worse health status, higher health care costs and worse prognosis. Reported prevalences of comorbidities largely differ between studies which might be explained by different assessment methods (objective assessment, self-reported assessment, or assessment by medical records), heterogeneous study populations, inappropriate control groups, incomparable methodologies, etc. This narrative review demonstrates and further evaluates the variability in prevalence of several comorbidities in patients with COPD and control individuals and discusses several shortcomings and pitfalls which need to be considered when interpreting comorbidity data. Like in other chronic organ diseases, the accurate diagnosis and integrated management of comorbidities is a key for outcome in COPD. This review highlights that there is a need to move from the starting point of an established index disease towards the concept of the development of multimorbidity in the elderly including COPD as an important and highly prevalent pulmonary component.

Real-world use of rescue inhaler sensors, electronic symptom questionnaires and physical activity monitors in COPD

Background

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a heterogeneous disease characterised by airflow obstruction and other morbidities such as respiratory symptoms, reduced physical activity and frequent bronchodilator use. Recent advances in personal digital monitoring devices can permit continuous collection of these data in COPD patients, but the relationships among them are not well understood.

Methods

184 individuals from a single centre of the COPDGene cohort agreed to participate in this 3-week observational study. Each participant used a smartphone to complete a daily symptom diary (EXAcerbations of Chronic pulmonary disease Tool, EXACT), wore a wrist-worn accelerometer to record continuously physical activity and completed the Clinical Visit PROactive Physical Activity in COPD questionnaire. 58 users of metered dose inhalers for rescue (albuterol) were provided with an inhaler sensor, which time stamped each inhaler actuation.

Results

Rescue inhaler use was strongly correlated with E-RS:COPD score, while step counts were correlated with neither rescue use nor E-RS:COPD score. Frequent, unpatterned inhaler use pattern was associated with worse respiratory symptoms and less physical activity compared with frequent inhaler use with a regular daily pattern. There was a strong week-by-week correlation among measurements, suggesting that 1 week of monitoring is sufficient to characterise stable patients with COPD.

Discussion

The study highlights the interaction and relevance of personal real-time monitoring of respiratory symptoms, physical activity and rescue medication in patients with COPD. Additionally, visual displays of longitudinal data may be helpful for disease management to help drive conversations between patients and caregivers and for risk-based monitoring in clinical trials.

What is a COPD exacerbation? Current definitions, pitfalls, challenges and opportunities for improvement

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a chronic illness that can be periodically punctuated by exacerbations, characterised by acute worsening of symptoms, including increased dyspnoea, cough, sputum production and sputum purulence. COPD exacerbations are common and have important clinical and economic consequences, including lost work productivity, increased utilisation of healthcare resources, temporary or permanent reductions in lung function and exercise capacity, hospitalisation, and sometimes death. Over the past two decades, clinicians and researchers have broadened their treatment goals for COPD to extend beyond improving lung function and symptoms, and have begun to address the importance of preventing and reducing exacerbations. However, despite the best efforts of clinicians and guideline committees, current definitions of COPD exacerbations are imperfect and fraught with problems. The cardinal symptoms of a COPD exacerbation are nonspecific and can result from acute cardiorespiratory illnesses other than COPD. A proposed definition, which may be more specific than current definitions, suggests that COPD exacerbation be defined as an acute or subacute worsening of dyspnoea (≥5 on a visual analogue scale that ranges from 0 to 10) sometimes but not necessarily accompanied by increased cough, sputum volume and/or sputum purulence. Necessary laboratory criteria for an exacerbation include oxygen desaturation ≤4% below that of stable state, elevated levels of circulating blood neutrophils or eosinophils (≥9000 neutrophils·mm^-3 or ≥2% blood eosinophils) and elevated C-reactive protein (≥3 mg·L^-1), without evidence of pneumonia or pulmonary oedema on chest radiography and with negative laboratory test results for other aetiologies. Herein, we discuss the current state of the art with respect to how we define COPD exacerbations, associated pitfalls and challenges, and opportunities for improvement.