1
|
Lin YA, Hong YT, Lin XJ, Lin JL, Xiao HM, Huang FF. Barriers and facilitators to uptake of lung cancer screening: A mixed methods systematic review. Lung Cancer 2022; 172:9-18. [PMID: 35963208 DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2022.07.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2022] [Revised: 06/02/2022] [Accepted: 07/27/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Numerous factors contribute to the low adherence to lung cancer screening (LCS) programs. A theory-informed approach to identifying the obstacles and facilitators to LCS uptake is required. This study aimed to identify, assess, and synthesize the available literature at the individual and healthcare provider (HCP) levels based on a social-ecological model and identify gaps to improve practice and policy decision-making. Systematic searches were conducted in nine electronic databases from inception to December 31, 2020. We also searched Google Scholar and manually examined the reference lists of systematic reviews to include relevant articles. Primary studies were scored for quality assessment. Among 3938 potentially relevant articles, 36 studies, including 25 quantitative and 11 qualitative studies, were identified for inclusion in the review. Fifteen common factors were extracted from 34 studies, including nine barriers and six facilitators. The barriers included individual factors (n = 5), health system factors (n = 3), and social/environmental factors (n = 1). The facilitators included only individual factors (n = 6). However, two factors, age and screening harm, remain mixed. This systematic review identified and combined barriers and facilitators to LCS uptake at the individual and HCP levels. The interaction mechanisms among these factors should be further explored, which will allow the construction of tailored LCS recommendations or interventions for the Chinese context.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yu-An Lin
- School of Nursing, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian, China
| | - Yu Ting Hong
- School of Nursing, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian, China
| | - Xiu Jing Lin
- School of Nursing, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian, China
| | - Jia Ling Lin
- School of Nursing, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian, China
| | - Hui Min Xiao
- School of Nursing, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian, China
| | - Fei Fei Huang
- School of Nursing, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian, China.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Li R, Luo L, Tao W, Huang W, Bao T. Level of knowledge on low-dose CT lung cancer screening in Sichuan province, China: a cross-sectional study. BMJ Open 2022; 12:e061987. [PMID: 36127104 PMCID: PMC9490565 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-061987] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Low-dose CT (LDCT) can help determine the early stage of lung cancer and reduce mortality. However, knowledge of lung cancer and lung cancer screening among community residents and medical workers, and potential factors that may affect medical institutions to set up LDCT are limited. DESIGN A cross-sectional study was conducted in Sichuan province, China, in 2021. Community residents, medical workers and medical institutions were randomly selected, and participants responded to related questionnaires. Knowledge of lung cancer and LDCT lung cancer screening was evaluated. Data analyses were performed using SAS V.9.4. RESULTS A total of 35 692 residents, 6350 medical workers and 81 medical institutions were recruited; 4.05% of the residents were very familiar with lung cancer and 37.89% were (completely) unfamiliar. Characteristics, such as age and level of education, were significantly related to residents who were very familiar with lung cancer. Furthermore, 22.87% of the residents knew that LDCT can effectively screen for early-stage lung cancer, which was correlated with smoking (OR 1.1300; 95% CI 1.0540 to 1.2110; p=0.006) and family history of cancer (OR 1.2210; 95% CI 1.1400 to 1.3080; p<0.0001); 66.06% of medical workers believed that LDCT can detect early-stage lung cancer. Technicians and nurses were less knowledgeable than doctors about whether LDCT can effectively screen for early-stage lung cancer (OR 0.6976; 95% CI 0.5399 to 0.9015; p=0.0059 and OR 0.6970; 95% CI 0.5718 to 0.8496; p=0.0004, respectively). Setting up LDCT in medical institutions was related to grade, administrative rank, number of hospital beds that opened and total number of medical workers. CONCLUSIONS The knowledge of lung cancer in residents is relatively low, and the knowledge of LDCT in screening (early-stage) lung cancer needs to be improved both in residents and medical workers. Possible factors that affect medical institutions to set up LDCT may need to be incorporated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ruicen Li
- Department of Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
- Health Management Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Li Luo
- Department of Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Wenjuan Tao
- Institute of Hospital Management, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Wenxia Huang
- Department of Healthcare, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Ting Bao
- Health Management Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Allen CG, Cotter MM, Smith RA, Watson L. Successes and challenges of implementing a lung cancer screening program in federally qualified health centers: a qualitative analysis using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. Transl Behav Med 2021; 11:1088-1098. [PMID: 33289828 PMCID: PMC8248958 DOI: 10.1093/tbm/ibaa121] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
In recent years, studies have shown that low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) is a safe and effective way to screen high-risk adults for lung cancer. Despite this, uptake remains low, especially in limited-resource settings. The American Cancer Society (ACS) partnered with two federally qualified health centers and accredited screening facilities on a 2 year pilot project to implement an LDCT screening program. Both sites attempted to develop a referral program and care coordination practices to move patients through the screening continuum and identify critical facilitators and barriers to implementation. Evaluators conducted key informant interviews (N = 46) with clinical and administrative staff, as well as regional ACS staff during annual site visits. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research guided our analysis of factors associated with effective implementation and improved screening outcomes. One study site established a sustainable lung screening program, while the other struggled to overcome significant implementation barriers. Increased time spent with patients, disruption to normal workflows, and Medicaid reimbursement policies presented challenges at both sites. Supportive, engaged leaders and knowledgeable champions who provided clear implementation guidance improved staff engagement and were able to train, guide, and motivate staff throughout the intervention. A slow, stepwise implementation process allowed one site's project champions to pilot test new processes and resolve issues before scaling up. This pilot study provides critical insights into the necessary resources and steps for successful lung cancer screening program implementation in underserved settings. Future efforts can build upon these findings and identify and address possible facilitators and barriers to screening program implementation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caitlin G Allen
- Department of Behavioral Science and Health Education,
Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA,
USA
| | - Megan M Cotter
- Population Sciences Department, American Cancer Society,
Inc., Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Robert A Smith
- Prevention and Early Detection Team, American Cancer
Society, Inc., Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Lesley Watson
- Strategy and Analytics Team, American Cancer Society
Cancer Action Network, Inc., Washington, DC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Shin DW, Cho JH, Yoo JE, Cho J, Yoon DW, Lee G, Shin S, Kim HK, Choi YS, Kim J, Zo JI, Shim YM. Conditional Survival of Surgically Treated Patients with Lung Cancer: A Comprehensive Analyses of Overall, Recurrence-free, and Relative Survival. Cancer Res Treat 2021; 53:1057-1071. [PMID: 33705624 PMCID: PMC8524014 DOI: 10.4143/crt.2020.1308] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2020] [Accepted: 03/06/2021] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Survival probability changes over time in cancer survivors. This study examined conditional survival in patients undergoing curative resection for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Materials and Methods Five-year conditional recurrence-free survival (CRFS), conditional overall survival (COS), and conditional relative survival (CRS) up to 10 years after surgery were calculated in patients who underwent NSCLC resection from 1994 to 2016. These rates were stratified according to age, sex, year of diagnosis, pathological stage, tumor histology, smoking status, comorbidity, and lung function. Results Five-year CRFS increased from 65.6% at baseline to 90.9% at 10 years after surgery. Early differences in 5-year CRFS according to stratified patient characteristics disappeared, except for age: older patients exhibited persistently lower 5-year CRFS. Five-year COS increased from 72.7% to 78.3% at 8 years and then decreased to 75.4% at 10 years. Five-year CRS increased from 79.0% at baseline to 86.8% at 10 years. Older age and higher pathologic stage were associated with lower 5-year COS and CRS up to 10 years after surgery. Female patients, those with adenocarcinoma histology, non-smokers, patient without comorbidities and had good lung function showed higher COS and CRS. Conclusion CRFS improved over time, but significant risk remained after 5 years. CRS slightly improved over time but did not reach 90%, suggesting significant excess mortality compared to the general population. Age and stage remained significant predictors of conditional survival several years after surgery. Our conditional survival estimates should help clinicians and patients make informed treatment and personal life decisions based on survivorship status.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dong Wook Shin
- Department of Family Medicine, Supportive Care Center, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.,Department of Clinical Research Design and Evaluation, Samsung Advanced Institute for Health Sciences and Technology (SAIHST), Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, Korea.,Department of Digital Health, Samsung Advanced Institute for Health Sciences and Technology (SAIHST), Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jong Ho Cho
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jung Eun Yoo
- Healthcare system Gangnan Center, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Juhee Cho
- Department of Clinical Research Design and Evaluation, Samsung Advanced Institute for Health Sciences and Technology (SAIHST), Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, Korea.,Cancer Education Center, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.,Department of Health Sciences and Technology, Samsung Advanced Institute for Health Sciences and Technology, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, Korea.,Departments of Health, Behavior, and Society and Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Dong Woog Yoon
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Armed Forces Capital Hospital, Seongnam, Korea
| | - Genehee Lee
- Department of Digital Health, Samsung Advanced Institute for Health Sciences and Technology (SAIHST), Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, Korea
| | - Sumin Shin
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hong Kwan Kim
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Yong Soo Choi
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jhingook Kim
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jae Ill Zo
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Young Mog Shim
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Park J, Lee J, Kim Y. Public opinion on implementing the National Lung Cancer Screening Program in Korea. Transl Lung Cancer Res 2021; 10:1355-1367. [PMID: 33889515 PMCID: PMC8044494 DOI: 10.21037/tlcr-20-865] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
Background Lung cancer screening for high-risk population using low-dose computed tomography is a valid strategy to reduce lung cancer mortality. This study investigated public opinions toward the initiation and participation in the National Lung Cancer Screening Program (NLCSP) launched in Korea. Methods In this cross-sectional analysis of the 2018 Korean National Cancer Screening Survey, we analyzed the responses related to lung cancer screening. Eligible participants for NLCSP are aged 55‒74 years with at least 30 pack-years of smoking history. We compared public opinions on implementing lung cancer screening according to smoking status and eligibility for NLCSP. Results Among 3,495 respondents, 205 (5.9%) were eligible for screening. Most of the respondents (71.2%) agreed with implementing NLCSP. Agreement rates were relatively lower in never smokers (66.2%) and higher in former (80.8%) and current smokers (82.3%). Factors associated with agreement included the presence of private health insurance [odds ratio (OR) 1.36, 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.04–1.78], regular health checkup (OR 2.10, 95% CI, 1.72–2.57), and smoking history (former, OR 1.66, 95% CI, 1.09–2.55; current, OR 1.97, 95% CI, 1.45–2.67). Preference of the screening facilities showed that quality was considered more important than accessibility (46.9% vs. 31.9%). Furthermore, people were more affirmative (75.5%) towards receiving mandatory smoking cessation counseling included in NLCSP. Conclusions Public agreement and active participation of the eligible population are key factors in the successful implementation of NLCSP. Our data would be a valuable resource in building appropriate strategies to maximize the benefits of nationwide lung cancer screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Junli Park
- Center for Cancer Prevention and Detection, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea
| | - Jaeho Lee
- National Cancer Control Institute, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea
| | - Yeol Kim
- Center for Cancer Prevention and Detection, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea.,National Cancer Control Institute, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
韦 梦, 乔 友. [Progress of Lung Cancer Screening with Low Dose Helical Computed Tomography]. ZHONGGUO FEI AI ZA ZHI = CHINESE JOURNAL OF LUNG CANCER 2020; 23:875-882. [PMID: 32791651 PMCID: PMC7583869 DOI: 10.3779/j.issn.1009-3419.2020.101.40] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2020] [Revised: 06/25/2020] [Accepted: 06/27/2020] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
Lung cancer which represents characteristics of a heavy disease burden, a large proportion of advanced lung cancer and a low five-year survival rate is a threat to human health. It is essential to implement population-based lung cancer screening to improve early detection and early treatment. The National Lung Screening Trial (NLST) demonstrated that screening with low dose helical computed tomography (LDCT) may decrease lung cancer mortality, which brings hope for the early diagnosis and treatment of lung cancer. In recent years, great progresses have been made on research of lung cancer screening with LDCT. However, whether LDCT could be applied to large population-based lung cancer screening projects is still under debate. In this paper, we review the recent progresses on history of lung cancer screening with LDCT, selection of high-risk individuals, management of pulmonary nodules, performance of screening, acceptance of LDCT and cost-effectiveness.
.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- 梦娜 韦
- />100021 北京,国家癌症中心/国家肿瘤临床医学研究中心/中国医学科学院北京协和医学院肿瘤医院流行病学室Department of Cancer Epidemiology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China
| | - 友林 乔
- />100021 北京,国家癌症中心/国家肿瘤临床医学研究中心/中国医学科学院北京协和医学院肿瘤医院流行病学室Department of Cancer Epidemiology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Ban WH, Yeo CD, Han S, Kang HS, Park CK, Kim JS, Kim JW, Kim SJ, Lee SH, Kim SK. Impact of smoking amount on clinicopathological features and survival in non-small cell lung cancer. BMC Cancer 2020; 20:848. [PMID: 32883225 PMCID: PMC7469911 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-020-07358-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2019] [Accepted: 08/27/2020] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Screening for early detection of lung cancer has been performed in high-risk individuals with smoking history. However, researches on the distribution, clinical characteristics, and prognosis of these high-risk individuals in an actual cohort are lacking. Thus, the objective of this study was to retrospectively review characteristics and prognosis of patients with smoking history in an actual lung cancer cohort. METHODS The present study used the lung cancer cohort of the Catholic Medical Centers at the Catholic University of Korea from 2014 to 2017. Patients with non-small cell lung cancer were enrolled. They were categorized into high and low-risk groups based on their smoking history using the national lung screening trial guideline. Distribution, clinical characteristics, and survival data of each group were estimated. RESULTS Of 439 patients, 223 (50.8%) patients were in the high-risk group. Patients in the high-risk group had unfavorable clinical characteristics and tumor biologic features. Overall survival of the high-risk group was significantly shorter than that of the low-risk group with both early (I, II) and advanced stages (III, IV). In multivariate analysis, heavy smoking remained one of the most important poor clinical prognostic factors in patients with lung cancer. It showed a dose-dependent relationship with patients' survival. CONCLUSIONS High-risk individuals had poor clinical outcomes. Patients' prognosis seemed to be deteriorated as smoking amount increased. Therefore, active screening and clinical attention are needed for high-risk individuals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Woo Ho Ban
- Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Eunpyeong St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Chang Dong Yeo
- Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Eunpyeong St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Solji Han
- Department of Applied Statistics, Yonsei University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Hye Seon Kang
- Division of Pulmonary, Allergy and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Bucheon St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Chan Kwon Park
- Division of Pulmonary, Allergy and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Yeouido St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Ju Sang Kim
- Division of Pulmonary, Allergy and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Incheon St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Jin Woo Kim
- Division of Pulmonary, Allergy and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Uijeongbu St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Seung Joon Kim
- Division of Pulmonary, Allergy and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea.,The Cancer Research Institute, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Sang Haak Lee
- Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Eunpyeong St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea.,The Cancer Research Institute, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Sung Kyoung Kim
- Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, St. Vincent's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Chen Y, Watson TR, Criss SD, Eckel A, Palazzo L, Sheehan DF, Kong CY. A simulation study of the effect of lung cancer screening in China, Japan, Singapore, and South Korea. PLoS One 2019; 14:e0220610. [PMID: 31361789 PMCID: PMC6667161 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0220610] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2019] [Accepted: 07/21/2019] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
More than 50% of the world's lung cancer cases occur in Asia and more than 20% of cancer deaths in Asia are attributable to lung cancer. The U.S. National Lung Screening Trial has shown that lung cancer screening with computed tomography (CT) can reduce lung cancer deaths. Using the Lung Cancer Policy Model-Asia (LCPM-Asia), we estimated the potential mortality reduction achievable through the implementation of CT-based lung cancer screening in China, Japan, Singapore, and South Korea. The LCPM-Asia was calibrated to the smoking prevalence of each of the aforementioned countries based on published national surveys and to lung cancer mortality rates from the World Health Organization. The calibrated LCPM-Asia was then used to simulate lung cancer deaths under screening and no-screening scenarios for the four countries. Using screening eligibility criteria recommended by the U.S. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), which are based on age and smoking history, we estimated the lung cancer mortality reduction from screening through year 2040. By 2040, lung cancer screening would result in 91,362 life-years gained and 4.74% mortality reduction in South Korea; 290,325 life-years gained and 4.33% mortality reduction in Japan; 3,014,215 life-years gained and 4.22% mortality reduction in China; and 8,118 life-years gained and 3.76% mortality reduction in Singapore. As for mortality reduction by smoker type, current smokers would have the greatest mortality reduction in each country, ranging from 5.56% in Japan to 6.86% in Singapore. Among the four countries, lung cancer screening under CMS eligibility criteria was most effective in South Korea and least effective in Singapore. Singapore's low smoking prevalence and South Korea's aging population and higher smoking prevalence may partially explain the discrepancy in effectiveness. CT screening was shown to be promising as a means of reducing lung cancer mortality in the four countries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yufan Chen
- Institute for Technology Assessment, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
| | - Tina R. Watson
- Institute for Technology Assessment, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
| | - Steven D. Criss
- Institute for Technology Assessment, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
| | - Andrew Eckel
- Institute for Technology Assessment, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
| | - Lauren Palazzo
- Institute for Technology Assessment, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
| | - Deirdre F. Sheehan
- Institute for Technology Assessment, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
| | - Chung Yin Kong
- Institute for Technology Assessment, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Shin DW, Cho JH, Noh JM, Han H, Han K, Park SH, Kim SY, Park JH, Park JH, Kawachi I. Disparities in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Lung Cancer among People with Disabilities. J Thorac Oncol 2019; 14:163-175. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jtho.2018.10.158] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2018] [Revised: 10/22/2018] [Accepted: 10/23/2018] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|