1
|
Patrinos D, Kleiderman E, Fraser W, Zawati MH. Developing Policy for the Healthy Life Trajectories Initiative: Going from National to International. Biopreserv Biobank 2023. [PMID: 37192471 DOI: 10.1089/bio.2022.0198] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/18/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: Scientific research is becoming an increasingly collaborative and global venture. The Healthy Life Trajectories Initiative (HeLTI), for instance, is an international Developmental Origins of Health and Disease research collaboration developed to address the increasing burden of noncommunicable diseases around the world. It comprises four separate but harmonized cohort trials in Canada, China, India, and South Africa. These cohorts will generate rich data and biosample sets that can be shared both within the HeLTI Consortium and with other researchers from around the world. Methods: To ensure the coordination and operation of these types of collaborative research initiatives, a standardized and harmonized governance model is required to regulate the processes and interactions between all involved actors. To develop the governance models, frameworks and related policies from other longitudinal cohort studies and biobanks were used, as were guidance documents on biobank and database governance and relevant literature on data and biobank governance. Results: This article outlines the key components of the governance model for the HeLTI Consortium, including management of the cohorts' respective databases and biobanks, access to data and biosamples, and considerations related to intellectual property and publications. Conclusion: Governance within international collaborative research ventures is critical to ensure the operations and benefits of these types of research apparatuses. Although this article focuses on the HeLTI Consortium as a model, it may nonetheless serve as a model for both current and future collaborative consortium-based research initiatives. Clinical Trial Registration Numbers: Canada, ISRCTN13308752; China, ChiCTR1800017773; India, ISRCTN20161479; South Africa, PACTR201903750173871.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dimitri Patrinos
- Centre of Genomics and Policy, Department of Human Genetics, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Erika Kleiderman
- Centre of Genomics and Policy, Department of Human Genetics, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - William Fraser
- Centre de recherche du Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada
| | - Ma'n H Zawati
- Centre of Genomics and Policy, Department of Human Genetics, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Iacomussi S, Casareto L, Locatelli M, Wang CM, Borroni S, Mascalzoni D, Sangiorgi L. Governance of Access in Biobanking: The Case of Telethon Network of Genetic Biobanks. Biopreserv Biobank 2021; 19:483-492. [PMID: 34870481 DOI: 10.1089/bio.2021.0057] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
The discussion concerning the measure of the quality of a biobank should focus not only on the number of stored samples and their quality but also on the assessment of their access arrangements and governance. This article aims at contributing to the ongoing debate on samples and data access governance in biobanking by presenting the case of the Telethon Network of Genetic Biobanks (TNGB). We attempt to contribute to the need for clear and available access criteria and harmonization in access arrangements to maximize the influence of biobanks in the progress of biomedical research. We reviewed all the sample requests submitted to the TNGB from 2008 to 2020, focusing on those rejected by the Access Committee and the reasons behind the rejections. The analysis of the reasons behind the rejected requests allowed us to analyze how those relate to the issues of scientific misconduct, prioritization, and noncompliance with the biobank's mission. We discuss those issues in light of the actions and motivations used by TNGB in the access decision-making process. Based on this analysis, we suggest that a cross-implementation of a checklist for access assessment would improve the whole access process, ensuring a more transparent and smoother governance. Finally, we conclude that the TNGB's Charter and approach toward access governance could contribute as an important reference point to deal with the issues that have emerged in the international discussion on the topic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Lorena Casareto
- Department of Rare Skeletal Disorders, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy
| | - Manuela Locatelli
- Department of Rare Skeletal Disorders, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy
| | | | - Simona Borroni
- Gruppo Famiglie Dravet Associazione Onlus, Milano, Italy
| | - Deborah Mascalzoni
- Istituto di Biomedicina, Eurac Research, Bolzano, Italy.,Centro di Biomedicina, Department of Public Health, Uppsala University, Sweden
| | - Luca Sangiorgi
- Department of Rare Skeletal Disorders, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Byrne JA, Carpenter JE, Carter C, Phillips K, Braye S, Watson PH, Rush A. Building Research Support Capacity across Human Health Biobanks during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Biomark Insights 2021; 16:11772719211024100. [PMID: 34177256 PMCID: PMC8207259 DOI: 10.1177/11772719211024100] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2021] [Accepted: 05/12/2021] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Human health biobanks are forms of research infrastructure that supply biospecimens and associated data to researchers, and therefore juxtapose the activities of clinical care and biomedical research. The discipline of biobanking has existed for over 20 years and is supported by several international professional societies and dedicated academic journals. However, despite both rising research demand for human biospecimens, and the growth of biobanking as an academic discipline, many individual biobanks continue to experience sustainability challenges. This commentary will summarize how the COVID-19 pandemic is creating new challenges and opportunities for both the health biobanking sector and the supporting discipline of biobanking. While the challenges for biobanks may be numerous and acute, there are opportunities for both individual biobanks and the discipline of biobanking to embrace change such that biobanks can continue to support and drive biomedical research. We will therefore describe numerous practical steps that individual biobanks and/or the discipline of biobanking can take to survive and possibly thrive in response to the COVID-19 pandemic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer A Byrne
- New South Wales Health Statewide Biobank, New South Wales Health Pathology, Camperdown, NSW, Australia.,Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Jane E Carpenter
- New South Wales Health Pathology, Newcastle, NSW, Australia.,Scientific Platforms, The Westmead Institute for Medical Research, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Candace Carter
- New South Wales Health Statewide Biobank, New South Wales Health Pathology, Camperdown, NSW, Australia
| | - Kathleen Phillips
- New South Wales Health Statewide Biobank, New South Wales Health Pathology, Camperdown, NSW, Australia
| | - Stephen Braye
- New South Wales Health Pathology, Newcastle, NSW, Australia
| | - Peter H Watson
- Biobanking and Biospecimen Research Services, Deeley Research Centre, BC Cancer Agency, Victoria, BC, Canada.,Canadian Tissue Repository Network, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Amanda Rush
- New South Wales Health Statewide Biobank, New South Wales Health Pathology, Camperdown, NSW, Australia.,Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,Children's Cancer Research Unit, Kids Research, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Westmead, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Granados Moreno P, Ali-Khan SE, Capps B, Caulfield T, Chalaud D, Edwards A, Gold ER, Rahimzadeh V, Thorogood A, Auld D, Bertier G, Breden F, Caron R, César PM, Cook-Deegan R, Doerr M, Duncan R, Issa AM, Reichman J, Simard J, So D, Vanamala S, Joly Y. Open science precision medicine in Canada: Points to consider. Facets (Ott) 2019. [DOI: 10.1139/facets-2018-0034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Open science can significantly influence the development and translational process of precision medicine in Canada. Precision medicine presents a unique opportunity to improve disease prevention and healthcare, as well as to reduce health-related expenditures. However, the development of precision medicine also brings about economic challenges, such as costly development, high failure rates, and reduced market size in comparison with the traditional blockbuster drug development model. Open science, characterized by principles of open data sharing, fast dissemination of knowledge, cumulative research, and cooperation, presents a unique opportunity to address these economic challenges while also promoting the public good. The Centre of Genomics and Policy at McGill University organized a stakeholders’ workshop in Montreal in March 2018. The workshop entitled “Could Open be the Yellow Brick Road to Precision Medicine?” provided a forum for stakeholders to share experiences and identify common objectives, challenges, and needs to be addressed to promote open science initiatives in precision medicine. The rich presentations and exchanges that took place during the meeting resulted in this consensus paper containing key considerations for open science precision medicine in Canada. Stakeholders would benefit from addressing these considerations as to promote a more coherent and dynamic open science ecosystem for precision medicine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Palmira Granados Moreno
- Centre of Genomics and Policy, Department of Human Genetics, McGill University, Montréal, QC H3A 0G1, Canada
| | - Sarah E. Ali-Khan
- Centre for Intellectual Property and Policy, Faculty of Law, McGill University, Montreal, QC H3A 1W9, Canada
| | - Benjamin Capps
- Department of Bioethics, Faculty of Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS B3H 4R2, Canada
| | - Timothy Caulfield
- Health Law Institute, Faculty of Law and School of Public Health, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 2H5, Canada
| | - Damien Chalaud
- Montreal Neurological Institute and Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, QC H3A 2B4, Canada
| | - Aled Edwards
- Montreal Neurological Institute and Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, QC H3A 2B4, Canada
- Structural Genomics Consortium, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5G 1L6, Canada
| | - E. Richard Gold
- Centre for Intellectual Property and Policy, Faculty of Law, McGill University, Montreal, QC H3A 1W9, Canada
| | - Vasiliki Rahimzadeh
- Centre of Genomics and Policy, Department of Human Genetics, McGill University, Montréal, QC H3A 0G1, Canada
| | - Adrian Thorogood
- Centre of Genomics and Policy, Department of Human Genetics, McGill University, Montréal, QC H3A 0G1, Canada
| | - Daniel Auld
- McGill University and Genome Quebec Innovation Centre, Montreal, QC H3A 0G1, Canada
| | - Gabrielle Bertier
- Centre of Genomics and Policy, Department of Human Genetics, McGill University, Montréal, QC H3A 0G1, Canada
| | - Felix Breden
- Department of Biological Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC V5A 1S6, Canada
| | - Roxanne Caron
- Centre of Genomics and Policy, Department of Human Genetics, McGill University, Montréal, QC H3A 0G1, Canada
| | - Priscilla M.D.G. César
- Centre for Intellectual Property and Policy, Faculty of Law, McGill University, Montreal, QC H3A 1W9, Canada
| | - Robert Cook-Deegan
- School for the Future of Innovation in Society, Barrett & O’Connor Washington Center, Arizona State University, Washington, DC 20006, USA
| | | | - Ross Duncan
- Public Health Agency of Canada, Ottawa, ON K1A 0K9, Canada
| | - Amalia M. Issa
- Centre of Genomics and Policy, Department of Human Genetics, McGill University, Montréal, QC H3A 0G1, Canada
- Department of Family Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, QC H3S 1Z1, Canada
- Personalized Medicine & Targeted Therapeutics, Philadelphia, PA 19803, USA
- Health Policy & Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of the Sciences in Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | | | - Jacques Simard
- Genomics Center, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Quebec-Laval University, Quebec City, QC G1V 4G2, Canada
| | - Derek So
- Centre of Genomics and Policy, Department of Human Genetics, McGill University, Montréal, QC H3A 0G1, Canada
| | - Sandeep Vanamala
- Montreal Neurological Institute and Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, QC H3A 2B4, Canada
| | - Yann Joly
- Centre of Genomics and Policy, Department of Human Genetics, McGill University, Montréal, QC H3A 0G1, Canada
| |
Collapse
|