Pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, safety, and tolerability of single-dose denosumab in healthy Chinese volunteers: A randomized, single-blind, placebo-controlled study

A randomized, double-blind, single-dose, phase 1 study comparing the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, safety, and immunogenicity of denosumab biosimilar CT‑P41 and reference denosumab in healthy males

BACKGROUND

This study's objective was to demonstrate pharmacokinetic (PK) similarity and safety of denosumab biosimilar, CT‑P41, and United States-licensed reference denosumab (US-denosumab) in healthy male Asian adults, considering also pharmacodynamic (PD) outcomes.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

This double-blind, two-arm, parallel-group, Phase 1 study randomized (1:1) healthy males to a single (60-mg) subcutaneous dose of CT‑P41 or US-denosumab. Primary endpoints were area under the concentration - time curve (AUC) from time zero to infinity (AUC0-inf), AUC from time zero to the last quantifiable concentration (AUC0-last), and maximum serum concentration (Cmax). PK equivalence was determined if 90% confidence intervals (CIs) for ratios of geometric least-squares means (gLSMs) were within the predefined 80-125% equivalence margin. Secondary PK, PD, safety, and immunogenicity outcomes were also evaluated.

RESULTS

Of 154 participants randomized (76 CT‑P41; 78 US-denosumab), 151 received study drug (74 CT‑P41; 77 US-denosumab). Primary and secondary PK results, PD results, safety, and immunogenicity were comparable between groups. Ninety percent CIs for ratios of gLSMs were within the predefined equivalence margin for AUC0-inf (100.4-114.7), AUC0-last (99.9-114.3), and Cmax (95.2-107.3).

CONCLUSIONS

Following a single dose in healthy males, CT‑P41 demonstrated PK equivalence with US-denosumab.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT06037395.

A randomized trial comparing LY01011, biosimilar candidate, with the reference product denosumab (Xgeva®) in healthy Chinese subjects

Background

Complications of bone metastases such as skeletal-related events lead to the impaired functional status and quality of life including death in patients with bone metastasis from solid tumors. Denosumab (XGEVA®) is indicated for the prevention of skeletal-related events in bone metastasis patients with solid tumors. The biosimilar product LY01011, a fully human anti-receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa-B ligand monoclonal antibody, was developed to be compared with the reference product denosumab.

Material and methods

A randomized, double-blind, single-dose, parallel-controlled phase 1 study was conducted in healthy Chinese subjects. A total of 168 enrolled subjects were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive a single 120 mg dose of LY01011 (n = 85) or denosumab (n = 83) subcutaneously. The primary pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters, including maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) and area under the concentration-time curve from time zero to last quantifiable concentration (AUC0→t), were collected and measured for evaluation. Other secondary PK parameters included AUC0- ∞, Tmax, CL/F, λz, t1/2, Vd/F, etc. Pharmacodynamics (PD), safety and immunogenicity profiles were also accounted for data analysis.

Results

The geometric mean ratios (GMRs) of LY01011 and denosumab for the primary PK parameters such as Cmax and AUC0→t were 98.13% and 100.32%. The 90% confidence intervals (CIs) were all within the acceptance range of 80%-125%. The GMRs of the PD parameters including AUEC0→t and Emax were 98.71% and 99.80%, which fell within the pre-defined acceptance range of 80%-125%. The results also demonstrated PK similarity even if Cmax and AUC0→∞ had been used as primary endpoints. Safety profiles were tolerable and similar between groups. 4 (4.7%) and 2 (2.4%) subjects had experienced Grade 3 or above treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) in LY01011 group and denosumab group. 3 subjects were reported to have serious adverse events (SAEs). None of the Grade 3 or above TEAEs and SAEs were related to the study drug, LY01011. No subject was tested anti-drug antibody (ADA) positive in both groups prior to the study drug administration. Following the study drug administration, only one subject in denosumab group was tested ADA positive, whereas no subject with ADA positive was reported in LY01011 group. No neutralizing antibody (Nab) was detected in either group throughout the study.

Conclusions

The study demonstrated PK and PD similarity of LY01011, a denosumab biosimilar, to denosumab in healthy Chinese subjects, with comparable safety and immunogenicity profiles.

Effect of agents affecting bone homeostasis on short- and long-term implant failure

OBJECTIVES

To review the current evidence on the relationship between agents that affect bone homeostasis and dental implant failures.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Electronic searches for bisphosphonates, denosumab, methotrexate, corticosteroids, romosozumab, sunitinib, and bevacizumab were performed using PubMed, MEDLINE (OVID), EMBASE (OVID), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (Cochrane Library), Cochrane Oral Health Group Trials Register (Cochrane Library) and Web of Science (Thomson Reuters). Manual searches were also conducted to complement the digital searches for recent issues.

RESULTS

Previous publications suggested that bisphosphonates do not compromise the survival of dental implants. However, one study documented an increased risk of implant failure in patients who had received high-dose of intravenous bisphosphonate therapy after implant rehabilitation. There has been an issue of MRONJ around implants in patients who have successfully received implant therapy before and after antiresorptive therapy, leading to late implant failure. Despite evidence on the detrimental effects of denosumab, methotrexate and corticosteroids on bone metabolism, their role in implant survival is not conclusive.

CONCLUSIONS

At present, there is insufficient evidence to establish a potential connection between agents that affects bone homeostasis and implant failure. However, some studies have reported negative results for implant therapy. In addition, implant-related sequestration in patients who received anti-resorptive therapy, despite of successful osseointegration, is also noticeable. Although limited studies are available at present, clinicians should still carefully consider the potential hazards and take appropriate precautions to minimize the risks associated with the medications and implant therapy.

Phase I, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Dose-Escalation Study of GB223, a Fully-Humanized Monoclonal Antibody to RANKL, in Healthy Chinese Adults

BACKGROUND

GB223 is a novel, fully-humanized monoclonal antibody against the receptor activator of nuclear factor-kappa B ligand (RANKL). In this phase I study, the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and immunogenicity of GB223 were investigated.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This was a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, single-dose escalation study conducted in 44 healthy Chinese adults. Participants were randomly assigned to receive a single subcutaneous injection dose of 7, 21, 63, 119, or 140 mg of GB223 (n = 34) or placebo (n = 10) and were followed up for 140-252 days.

RESULTS

The results of noncompartmental analysis showed that GB223 was slowly absorbed after dosing, with a time to reach maximum concentration (Tmax) ranging from 5 to 11 days. Serum GB223 concentrations decreased slowly, with a long half-life ranging from 7.91 to 19.60 days. A two-compartment Michaelis-Menten model was found to best describe the pharmacokinetics of GB223, and the absorption rate of GB223 differed between males (0.0146 h-1) and females (0.0081 h-1). Serum C-terminal telopeptide of type I collagen decreased significantly postdose, and the inhibition lasted 42-168 days. No deaths or drug-related serious adverse events occurred. The most frequent adverse events were blood parathyroid hormone increased (94.1%), blood phosphorus decreased (67.6%) and blood calcium decreased (58.8%). In the GB223 group, 44.1% (15/34) of subjects were antidrug antibody positive after dosing.

CONCLUSION

In this study, we demonstrated for the first time that a single subcutaneous injection of GB223, from 7 to 140 mg, is safe and well tolerated in healthy Chinese subjects. GB223 has a nonlinear pharmacokinetic profile, and sex was a potential covariate that may affect the absorption rate of GB223.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT04178044 and ChiCTR1800020338.

Severe hypocalcemia after denosumab treatment leading to refractory ventricular tachycardia and veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support: a case report

BACKGROUND

Severe hypocalcemia may lead to life-threatening arrhythmias. Denosumab is an effective treatment for osteoporosis that allows long intervals between doses. However, there is a risk of hypocalcemia in some patients. Due to the long half-life of denosumab, emergency physicians caring for patients presenting with symptoms of hypocalcemia may not be aware of the medication, and adverse effects may last longer.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 55-year-old woman with a history of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and anxiety disorder called for an ambulance for symptoms of hyperventilation and muscle cramps. After evaluation at the local hospital, she developed pulseless ventricular tachycardia and was resuscitated by defibrillation by the hospital staff. After conversion to sinus rhythm, she was transported to a tertiary center. Upon arrival, pulseless ventricular tachycardia occurred again, and veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) and intra-aortic balloon pumping (IABP) were implemented. Laboratory results showed severe hypocalcemia (corrected calcium level of 5.3 mg/dL) whereupon intravenous calcium supplementation was started. She had received the first dose of denosumab (60 mg) by subcutaneous injection 24 days prior to hospitalization. She was eventually weaned from ECMO and IABP support.

CONCLUSION

Cardiac arrest due to hypocalcemia is relatively rare but can be fatal. In the present case, hyperventilation may have acutely exacerbated pre-existing hypocalcemia, leading to ventricular tachycardia. The patient had a slightly decreased serum calcium level prior to denosumab. Close monitoring may be preferable after the primary dose of denosumab in selected patients. Emergency physicians caring for patients who may be suffering from symptoms/signs of hypocalcemia must be mindful of medications that have long half-lives and affect electrolyte balance when treating fatal arrhythmia due to hypocalcemia.

Pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, safety and immunogenicity of recombinant, fully human anti-RANKL monoclonal antibody (MW031) versus denosumab in Chinese healthy subjects: a single-center, randomized, double-blind, single-dose, parallel-controlled trial

BACKGROUND

MW031 is a biosimilar candidate of denosumab (Prolia®). This study aimed to compare the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, safety and immunogenicity of MW031 to denosumab in healthy Chinese participants.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

In this single-center, randomized, double-blind, parallel-controlled, single-dose trial, participants were given 60 mg MW031 (N = 58) or denosumab (N = 61) by subcutaneous injection and observed for 140 days. The primary endpoint was the bioequivalence of PK parameters (Cmax, AUC0-∞), and secondary endpoints including PD parameter, safety, and immunogenicity.

RESULTS

A comparison of main PK parameters showed that the geometric mean ratios (GMR) (90% confidence intervals [CIs]) of AUC0-∞ and Cmax for MW031 over denosumab were 105.48% (98.96%, 112.43%) and 98.58% (92.78%, 104.75%), respectively. The inter-CV values of AUC0-∞ and Cmax for MW031 ranged from 19.9% to 23.1%. PD parameter (sCTX) in the MW031 and denosumab groups were similar, and the positivity rates of immunogenicity were 0% in both groups. This study also showed similar safety profiles in both groups, and there were no drug-related, high-incidence and previously unreported adverse reactions.

CONCLUSION

This trial confirmed similar pharmacokinetic profiles of MW031 and denosumab in healthy male participants, and pharmacodynamic profile, immunogenicity and safety were comparable for both drugs.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT04798313; CTR20201149.

Nanoparticle-mediated synergistic drug combination for treating bone metastasis

Bone metastasis at an advanced disease stage is common in most solid tumors and is untreatable. Overexpression of receptor activator of nuclear factor κB ligand (RANKL) in tumor-bone marrow microenvironment drives a vicious cycle of tumor progression and bone resorption. Biodegradable nanoparticles (NPs), designed to localize in the tumor tissue in bone marrow, were evaluated in a prostate cancer model of bone metastasis. The combination treatment, encapsulating docetaxel, an anticancer drug (TXT-NPs), and Denosumab, a monoclonal antibody that binds to RANKL (DNmb-NPs), administered intravenously regressed the tumor completely, preventing bone resorption, without causing any mortality. With TXT-NPs alone treatment, after an initial regression, the tumor relapsed and acquired resistance, whereas DNmb-NPs alone treatment was ineffective. Only in the combination treatment, RANKL was not detected in the tumor tibia, thus negating its role in tumor progression and bone resorption. The combination treatment was determined to be safe as the vital organ tissue showed no increase in inflammatory cytokine or the liver ALT/AST levels, and animals gained weight. Overall, dual drug treatment acted synergistically to modulate the tumor-bone microenvironment with encapsulation enhancing their therapeutic potency to achieve tumor regression.

Effects of denosumab treatment on the expression of receptor activator of nuclear kappa-B ligand (RANKL) and TNF-receptor TNFRSF9 after total hip arthroplasty-results from a randomized placebo-controlled clinical trial

We investigated whether the drug denosumab modulates the inflammatory response after total hip arthroplasty in a randomized controlled trial. Significantly increased expression of RANKL was found in patients treated with denosumab. This could provide an explanation for the rebound effect with rapid loss of BMD seen after discontinuation of denosumab treatment.

PURPOSE

To evaluate whether denosumab, a human monoclonal antibody directed against receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa-B ligand (RANKL), modulates the inflammatory response after cementless total hip arthroplasty (THA) in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip.

METHODS

Sixty-four patients operated with cementless THA were randomized to two doses of 60-mg denosumab or placebo 1-3 days and 6 months postoperatively. Serum samples were analyzed by a multiplex extension assay detecting 92 inflammation-related proteins. Bone turnover markers were assessed. Proteins were analyzed using linear mixed effect models. Validation of conspicuous findings was performed with ELISA.

RESULTS

Two proteins were significantly affected by denosumab treatment: RANKL and tumor necrosis factor receptor super family member 9 (TNFRSF9). Serum levels of RANKL were more than twice as high in the denosumab than in the placebo group 3 months after surgery (ratio 2.10, p<0.001). Six and 12 months after surgery, the expression of RANKL was still elevated in the denosumab-treated group (ratios 1.50, p < 0.001; 1.47, p =0.002). The expression of TNFRSF9 was lower in the denosumab group at 3 months (ratio 0.68, p<0.001). In the denosumab group, concentrations of bone turnover markers were substantially reduced after 3 months, remained suppressed after 6 and 12 months, but increased above baseline at 24 months after surgery.

CONCLUSION

Two subcutaneous denosumab injections 6 months apart increase RANKL and depress TNFRSF9 after THA. This provides a possible explanation for the rebound effect on bone turnover markers as well as bone mineral density (BMD) upon withdrawal of denosumab. None of the other measured markers of inflammation was influenced by denosumab treatment.

Safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics of JMT103 in patients with bone metastases from solid tumors

Bone metastases are common complications of solid tumors. The outcome is poor despite major progress in cancer therapies. We describe a multicenter, open-label, phase 1, dose escalation and expansion trial of JMT103, a novel fully humanized receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa-B ligand (RANKL)-targeting monoclonal antibody, in adults with bone metastases from solid tumors. The study assessed the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics of JMT103. Patients received JMT103 at doses of 0.5, 1.0, 2.0, and 3.0 mg/kg every 4 weeks for 3 cycles. Among 59 patients enrolled, 20 and 39 patients participated in the dose-escalation and dose-expansion phases, respectively. One dose-limiting toxicity was observed at 2.0 mg/kg. The maximum tolerated dose was not determined. Treatment-related adverse events were reported in 29 (49.2%) patients, most commonly hypophosphatemia (30.5%), hypocalcemia (23.7%), and hypermagnesemia (10.2%). No treatment-related serious adverse events were reported. Two patients died due to disease progression, which were attributed to gastric cancer and lung neoplasm malignant respectively. Dose proportionality occurred between exposure levels and administered dose was within a dose range of 0.5 to 3.0 mg/kg. The suppression of urinary N-telopeptide corrected for creatinine was rapid, significant, and sustained across all doses of JMT103, with the median change from baseline ranging from –61.4% to –92.2% at day 141. JMT103 was well tolerated in patients with bone metastases from solid tumors, with a manageable safety profile. Bone antiresorptive activity shows the potential of JMT103 for treatment of bone metastases from solid tumors.

Registration No.: NCT03550508; URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/

A Randomized Controlled Dose-Escalation Study of LY06006, a Recombinant Humanized Monoclonal Antibody to RANKL, in Chinese Healthy Adults

Background: This study was conducted to explore the safety, tolerance, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and immunogenicity of LY06006, a recombinant humanized monoclonal antibody to RANKL, when administrated subcutaneously in Chinese healthy adults.

Research design and methods: This was a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, single ascending dose study performed in 32 healthy Chinese adults, who were randomly assigned to receive a single injection dose of 18, 60, 120 mg study drug or placebo with a follow-up of 140–252 days.

Results: No deaths or drug-related serious adverse events occurred. LY06006 was rapidly absorbed in the 60 mg group with a T_max range of 120–480 h and serum LY06006 concentrations decreased slowly 11–13 days after dosing with a long mean (SD) half-life of 389.58 (63.44) h. The most frequent AEs were elevated serum parathyroid hormone (PTH) level (83.3%), hypocalcemia (54.2%), and hypophosphatemia (45.8%). None of the 32 subjects tested positive for anti-drug antibody during the trial.

Conclusion: Single-dose subcutaneous administration of LY06006 was safe and well-tolerated in healthy Chinese adults. C_max showed linear pharmacokinetic characteristics in the dose range of 18–120 mg based on dose-exposure proportionality analysis.

Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, Safety and Immunogenicity of CMAB807, a New Denosumab Biosimilar, in Healthy Chinese Subjects

Objective: Pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD), safety and immunogenicity studies were conducted to evaluate the bioequivalence of CMAB807, a biosimilar to denosumab (Prolia^®), which is the only approved RANKL inhibitor for the treatment of osteoporosis.

Methods: In this randomized, double-blind, single-dose phase I study, 132 healthy Chinese male subjects received a subcutaneous injection of 60 mg of CMAB807 or denosumab at a 1:1 ratio. The PK, PD, safety and immunogenicity results were assessed prior to and up to 126 days after administration.

Results: The PK profiles of CMAB807 and denosumab were similar. The geometric mean ratios of the maximum concentration (C_max), AUC_0-t and AUC_o-∞ were 102.41, 104.15 and 103.89%, respectively, and the 90% confidence interval was observed to be within 80.00–125.00%, which indicated the bioequivalence of CMAB807 and denosumab. The PD profiles of the two groups were also comparable. The production of the C-terminal cross-linking telopeptide of type I collagen (CTX1) was inhibited by up to 85% for 10 days, and this inhibition was sustained for up to 126 days in both the CMAB807 and denosumab groups. No subjects in the CMAB807 group, three subjects in the denosumab group before administration, and two subjects in the denosumab group after administration were positive for anti-drug antibody (ADA). Adverse events (AEs) were observed in 98.5% of subjects in both groups. The most common AE recorded was increased parathyroid hormone (PTH) levels, with incidences of 92.4 and 95.5% in the CMAB807 and denosumab groups, respectively. No clinically meaningful differences were observed in safety and immunogenicity between CMAB807 and denosumab.

Conclusion: CMAB807 represents a new potential treatment option for patients with osteoporosis.

Clinical Trial Registration:https://clinicaltrials.gov (Registration No. NCT03925051), http://www.chinadrugtrial/org.cn/index.html (Registration No. CTR20190800).

Life-threatening sustained hypocalcemia following Denosumab use in metastatic prostate cancer

INTRODUCTION

Prostate cancer is the second most frequently diagnosed cancer among men worldwide in 2020. Skeletal-related events (SRE) like pathologic fracture or spinal cord compression are commonly seen in metastatic prostate cancer. Denosumab, a monoclonal antibody, acts by inhibiting osteoclast-mediated bone resorption in bone metastasis from solid tumors and reduces bone turnover and destruction. However, there is an increased risk of life-threatening denosumab-induced hypocalcemia with an incidence of 0.1 to 12.8%.

CASE REPORT

Our patient is a 69-year-old man with widespread skeletal metastatic disease from primary prostate cancer who presented to the hospital complaining of generalized fatigue and joint pain. Due to severe debilitating low back pain secondary to osteochondral lesions, the patient was started on Denosumab 120 mg. On presentation, serum calcium was found to be severely low at 5.9 mg/dl (serum calcium level prior to Denosumab was 9.1 mg/dl).

MANAGEMENT AND OUTCOME

Denosumab was discontinued immediately, and the patient was started on IV calcium gluconate. Repeat serum calcium level continued to be low at 6.7 likely due to the long elimination half-life of Denosumab (25-30 days). He was transferred to a long-term acute care facility for long-term IV calcium replacement, where he succumbed to illness six weeks later.

DISCUSSION

Denosumab, an anti-resorptive treatment for skeletal metastasis from solid tumors, is shown to cause severe life-threatening hypocalcemia. The maximum serum drug level of Denosumab reaches 7-21 days after administration. Sustained hypocalcemia is rare and life-threatening. Clinicians should use this medication with caution due to its unpredictable side effect profile.

Pharmacokinetic properties of metamizole active metabolites in Northeastern Brazilian donkeys (Equus asinus)

Metamizole (MT), also known as dipyrone, is an analgesic and antipyretic drug labeled for use in humans and domestic animals in some countries. As with other drugs, the administration of MT in donkeys is based on studies carried out with horses. In the present report, we aimed to determine the pharmacokinetics of the two main metamizole active metabolites (N-methyl-4-aminoantipyrine [MAA] and 4-aminoantipyrine [AA]) following 10 (M₁₀ ) and 25 mg/kg (M₂₅ ) IV metamizole doses in Northeast Brazilian donkeys (n = 10). Blood was collected at predetermined times within over 48 h; MAA and AA plasma concentrations were determined by a validated LC-MS/MS method. The metabolites were quantifiable in the M₁₀ until 12 h and M₂₅ until 24 h after drug administration. As expected, AUC_0→t , AUC_0→∞, and C_max demonstrated significant differences increases in metamizole metabolites profiles when groups were compared. No adverse effects were observed. This study indicates the need for an extremely sensitive analytical method to adequately characterize the pharmacokinetics of active metabolites of MT, MAA, and AA. In conclusion, the method developed in this research was able to measure the active metabolites of metamizole and with that it was possible to establish their pharmacokinetic profile. Furthermore, after projection of the minimum MAA concentrations, it is possible to infer that the dose of 10 mg/kg will be used on donkeys at 6 h intervals, while the M25 group at 12 h intervals. However, clinical studies are needed to assess this hypothesis.

A pragmatic window of opportunity to minimise the risk of MRONJ development in individuals with osteoporosis on Denosumab therapy: a hypothesis

Denosumab is associated with the development of medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ), an uncommon but severe oral side effect with a higher prevalence in metastatic cancer patients than in patients with metabolic bone fragility. Although several oral triggers can initiate MRONJ, invasive oral treatments and tooth extraction still remain the most common precipitating event. In general, tooth extraction and oral surgery should be avoided in patients at increased risk of MRONJ, while extraction of non-restorable teeth should be performed based on specific risk reduction protocols to eliminate dental/periodontal infections, still protecting from MRONJ onset. Based on the different pharmacological activity of denosumab and nitrogen-containing bisphosphonates, it is likely that the MRONJ risk profile of patients with osteoporosis could somewhat vary. We hypothesize the chance to maximize the pharmacokinetic of denosumab 60 mg (Prolia®) and identify a time interval in which invasive oral treatments can ideally take place without restrictions in patients with metabolic bone fragility, We propose that dental surgery (e.g. tooth extraction) may be safely performed without additional intra or peri-operative procedures in osteoporosis patients using denosumab provided that careful case selection, adequate communication among specialists, planning of a delayed dosing window (1-month deferral) and rigorous postoperative follow-up are granted.

Denosumab is not associated with risk of malignancy: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

The immunomodulatory effects of denosumab have raised concerns for risk of malignancy. This meta-analysis of 25 randomized controlled trials (21,523 patients) shows similar risk of malignancy between denosumab (60 mg every 6 months, up to 48 months) and any comparator. Post-marketing surveillance may detect rare or late-occurring drug effects. Possible increased risk of malignancy in patients treated with denosumab has been concerned due to inhibition of the immune modulator receptor activator of nuclear factor κ-Β ligand (RANKL). We aimed to assess the risk of malignancy associated with denosumab treatment. PubMed and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched up to May 27, 2019 to include all randomized controlled trials of denosumab (60 mg every 6 months) versus any comparator. Trials using higher drug doses for prevention of skeletal-related events were excluded. Data were independently extracted by two reviewers and analyzed using a fixed-effect model to pool risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Twenty-five trials (21,523 patients) were included. The risk of malignancy was similar between denosumab and other comparators (absolute risk difference 0%, RR 1.08 [95% CI, 0.93-1.24], I² = 0%). Sensitivity analysis based on adequate allocation concealment showed similar results. The risk of malignancy did not differ between groups in any of the subgroup analyses, including stratification by race, individual comparators, indications for treatment, and longer drug exposure (≥ 24 months, 9 studies). The risk ratio of malignancy-related death was similar between groups. Early concerns about a potential increased risk of malignancy resulting from an immunomodulatory effect of denosumab are not supported by evidence from this meta-analysis of 25 RCTs with drug exposure of up to 48 months. Since RCTs with longer observation for safety outcomes are not expected, post-marketing surveillance will be the main means for detection of rare or late-occurring events.

Safety and pharmacokinetics of a biosimilar of denosumab (KN012): Phase 1 and bioequivalence study in healthy Chinese subjects

BACKGROUND

KN012 is a proposed biosimilar candidate for the reference drug denosumab, with the brand name Prolia®. This study explored the tolerance, variability, and pharmacokinetics (PK) of denosumab and its biosimilar in healthy Chinese subjects.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

A randomized, double-blind, parallel, two-arm study was performed to analyze the bioequivalence of denosumab biosimilar (60 mg) compared with denosumab.

RESULTS

The PK properties of denosumab biosimilar were similar to those of denosumab. When denosumab biosimilar was compared to denosumab, the geometric mean ratios (GMRs) of C_max, AUC_0-t, and AUC_0-∞ were 98.74%, 102.54%, and 102.18%, respectively, and the 90% confidence interval was observed to be within 80-125%. The inter-subject variability ranged from 31.4% to 34.6%. Five subjects in the denosumab biosimilar group and one subject in the denosumab group were positive for anti-drug antibodies (ADAs) and negative for neutralizing antibodies (NAbs). Adverse reactions were observed in 100% (52 subjects) and 94.0% (47 subjects) of the subjects in the denosumab biosimilar and denosumab groups, respectively. Reductions in the blood calcium and phosphate levels were the most common adverse reactions.

CONCLUSION

The PK characteristics were comparable for the denosumab biosimilar and denosumab groups. Their safety profiles were also similar.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

: The trial is registered at the Chinese Clinical Trial website (http://www.chinadrugtrials.org.cn/index.html #CTR20181231).

A Phase I, Randomized, Single-Dose Study to Evaluate the Biosimilarity of QL1206 to Denosumab Among Chinese Healthy Subjects

Objective

This study was conducted to explore the tolerance, variability, pharmacokinetics (PK), and pharmacodynamics (PD) of denosumab biosimilar (QL1206) in healthy Chinese subjects.

Methods

This is a randomized, double-blind, two-arm, parallel study performed to examine the bioequivalence of denosumab biosimilar, QL1206, with that of Xgeva^® (Denosumab) as a reference drug. A single dose of 120 mg/kg of the denosumab biosimilar or Xgeva^® was administered to the subjects, who were followed up for 134 days.

Results

Similar PK properties as those of Xgeva^® were exhibited by QL1206. When compared to QL1206 with Xgeva^®, the 90% confidence intervals of the ratios for C_max, AUC_0-t, and AUC_0-∞ were observed to be within 80-125%. The inter-subject variability (inter-CV) ranged from 29% to 39.5%. Six and three subjects in the QL1206 and Xgeva^® groups were found to be positive for the ADA and negative for the NAb, respectively. The CTX1 concentration-time profiles appeared similar (about 80% decrease from 48 hours to134 days) between the QL1206 and Xgeva^® groups. Adverse events (AEs) were observed in 92.6% and 93.4% of subjects in the QL1206 and Xgeva^® groups, respectively. Reduction in blood calcium level was found to be the most common AE recorded, with an incidence of 72.8% versus 72.4% in the QL1206 and Xgeva^® groups, respectively.

Conclusion

Similar PK and PD characteristics were exhibited by QL1206 as compared to those of Xgeva^®. The inter-CV was slightly large. The safety profiles of denosumab biosimilars and Xgeva^® were found to be similar.

A case of minimal change disease after the administration of anti receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa B ligand (RANKL) monoclonal antibody: a case report

BACKGROUND

Minimal change disease (MCD) is one of the causes of idiopathic nephrotic syndrome in adults. The pathogenesis of proteinuria in MCD has not been fully understood. Recently, it has been reported that the receptor activator of nuclear factor-kappa B (RANK)/RANK ligand (RANKL) may contribute to the podocyte biology in kidney diseases. Denosumab is a human anti-RANKL monoclonal antibody used to treat osteoporosis. Here we report a case of MCD after denosumab administration.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 59-year-old male without any episodes of proteinuria was given denosumab to treat osteoporosis. Two weeks after its administration, he noticed a foamy urine and bilateral pretibial edema. Laboratory tests revealed that he had severe proteinuria (15g/g Cr), hypoproteinemia (4.0g/dL), and hypoalbuminemia (1.5g/dL). Based on the results, he was diagnosed with nephrotic syndrome. The proteinuria selectivity index was 0.05, indicating selective proteinuria. Renal biopsy showed minor glomerular abnormality with less tubulointerstitial damage, and electron microscopy showed extensive foot process effacement, indicating MCD. With all these results, glucocorticoid therapy of 50mg/day prednisolone was started. After 4weeks of treatment, the urinary protein level remains high (3.1g/g Cr). Prednisolone therapy was continued, and the levels of proteinuria decreased gradually to the range of partial remission (1.2g/g Cr) with another 7weeks of prednisolone treatment, but complete remission was not achieved.

CONCLUSIONS

This might be a case wherein RANKL inhibition is associated with the pathogenesis of MCD. Further studies will be needed to elucidate the causal relationship of RANK-RANKL signaling to the pathogenesis of MCD.

The Molecular Mechanisms That Underlie the Immune Biology of Anti-drug Antibody Formation Following Treatment With Monoclonal Antibodies

Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) are a crucial asset for human health and modern medicine, however, the repeated administration of mAbs can be highly immunogenic. Drug immunogenicity manifests in the generation of anti-drug antibodies (ADAs), and some mAbs show immunogenicity in up to 70% of patients. ADAs can alter a drug's pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties, reducing drug efficacy. In more severe cases, ADAs can neutralize the drug's therapeutic effects or cause severe adverse events to the patient. While some contributing factors to ADA formation are known, the molecular mechanisms of how therapeutic mAbs elicit ADAs are not completely clear. Accurate ADA detection is necessary to provide clinicians with sufficient information for patient monitoring and clinical intervention. However, ADA assays present unique challenges because both the analyte and antigen are antibodies, so most assays are cumbersome, costly, time consuming, and lack standardization. This review will discuss aspects related to ADA formation following mAb drug administration. First, we will provide an overview of the prevalence of ADA formation and the available diagnostic tools for their detection. Next, we will review studies that support possible molecular mechanisms causing the formation of ADA. Finally, we will summarize recent approaches used to decrease the propensity of mAbs to induce ADAs.

Radiation therapy combined with bone-modifying agents ameliorates local control of osteolytic bone metastases in breast cancer

Bone-modifying agents (BMAs) are frequently used for the treatment of bone metastases. Both BMA and radiation therapy (RT) are effective; however, there are few studies that have evaluated the efficacy of the combination treatment. We evaluated the effectiveness of RT + BMA in breast cancer-induced osteolytic bone metastasis as compared to BMA alone. A total of 43 lesions in 25 patients were evaluated. The median follow-up period was 18 (range, 2-90) months. None of the lesions was treated with chemotherapy or molecular targeted drugs during the follow-up period for evaluating the local response. Patients with complete or partial response were considered as responders, while those with stable or progressive disease were considered as non-responders. The rate of response with RT + BMA was significantly higher than that with BMA alone (P = 0.001). The cumulative incidence rate of response at 6 months was 54.4% in the RT + BMA group and 27.5% in the BMA alone group. The median time to response was 4 (range, 2-11) months in the RT + BMA group and 6 (range, 4-16) months in the BMA alone group. The overall survival rate in the responder group (83.1% at 1 year) was significantly higher than that in the non-responder group (37.5% at 1 year) (P = 0.029). In conclusion, RT combined with BMA was found to be more effective than BMA alone for the treatment of osteolytic bone metastasis, which thereby improves the prognosis.

Risk for Infections During Treatment With Denosumab for Osteoporosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

CONTEXT

Denosumab inhibits the receptor activator of nuclear factor κ-Β ligand, an immune system modulator. Safety endpoints including risk for infections were assessed as secondary outcomes in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of the drug.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the risk of serious adverse events of infections (SAEI) in denosumab-treated patients.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched up to May 27, 2019.

STUDY SELECTION

All RCTs of denosumab (60 mg every 6 months) versus any comparator were included. We excluded trials in cancer patients for prevention of skeletal-related events.

DATA EXTRACTION

Two reviewers independently applied selection criteria and extracted the data. Risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were pooled using a fixed effect model. Sensitivity analysis was based on risk of bias.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Thirty-three studies (22 253 patients) were included. There was a higher incidence of SAEI during denosumab treatment versus any comparator (RR, 1.21; 95% CI, 1.04-1.40; I2 = 0%), mainly of ear, nose, and throat (RR, 2.66; 95% CI, 1.20-5.91) and gastrointestinal origin (RR, 1.43; 95% CI, 1.02-2.01). RR was similar in a sensitivity analysis based on adequate allocation concealment. The RR of any infection (RR, 1.03; 95% CI, 0.99-1.06) and infection-related mortality (RR, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.20-1.23) was comparable between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

A higher incidence of SAEI is demonstrated during treatment with denosumab in an osteoporosis dose. Nevertheless, the overall risk for any infection or related mortality is similar to comparator groups. These findings merit consideration before therapy initiation.

A case of denosumab-associated membranous nephropathy in a patient with rheumatoid arthritis

We herein report a case of anti-RANKL monoclonal antibody-associated membranous nephropathy (MN). A 67-year-old woman with a history of rheumatoid arthritis treated with prednisolone and methotrexate for more than 30 years and osteoporosis treated with eldecalcitol and teriparatide for 4 years had achieved a stable disease condition. Her kidney function was normal and her urinalysis was negative for hematuria and proteinuria. An anti-RANKL monoclonal antibody (denosumab) was administered for the treatment of osteoporosis. Four months later, proteinuria appeared (2.3 g/g creatinine) and remained positive for about 6 months, therefore, she was admitted to our hospital. An immunofluorescence study revealed fine granular deposits of immunoglobulin G (IgG) and C3 along the capillary walls. Staining for IgG subclasses showed positive staining for IgG1 (3+), IgG2 (1+), IgG3 (1+), and IgG4 (1+); phospholipase A2 receptor was negative. Electron microscopy showed partial subepithelial and intramembranous deposits and focal thickening of the glomerular basement membrane. No evidence of malignancy or infectious disease was seen. After cessation of denosumab, the proteinuria gradually improved. Based on the renal biopsy results and clinical course (development of marked proteinuria in the presence of denosumab with subsequent amelioration in the absence of the drug), we diagnosed the patient with secondary MN due to denosumab. This is the first reported case of denosumab-associated MN.