Acuity and colour vision changes post intravitreal dexamethasone implant injection in patients with diabetic macular oedema

Additional measures of macular function beyond visual acuity

PURPOSE

Visual function is a complex process in which external visual stimuli are interpreted. Patients with retinal diseases and prolonged follow-up times may experience changes in their visual function that are not detected by the standard visual acuity measure, as they are a result of other alterations in visual function. With the advancement of different methods to evaluate visual function, additional measurements have become available, and further standardization suggests that some methods may be promising for use in clinical trials or routine clinical practice. The objectives of this article are to review these additional measurements and to provide guidance on their application.

METHODS

The Vision Academy's membership of international retinal disease experts reviewed the literature and developed consensus recommendations for the application of additional measures of visual function in routine clinical practice or clinical trials.

RESULTS

Measures such as low-luminance visual acuity, contrast sensitivity, retinal fixation and microperimetry, and reading performance are measures which can complement visual acuity measurements to provide an assessment of overall visual function, including impact on patients' quality of life. Measures such as dark adaptation, color vision testing, binocular vision testing, visual recognition testing, and shape discrimination require further optimization and validation before they can be implemented in everyday clinical practice.

CONCLUSION

Additional measurements of visual function may help identify patients who could benefit from earlier diagnosis, detection of disease progression, and therapeutic intervention. New and additional functional clinical trial endpoints are required to fully understand the early stages of macular disease, its progression, and the response to treatment.

Color Vision in Blue Cone Monochromacy: Outcome Measures for a Clinical Trial

Purpose

Blue cone monochromacy (BCM) is an X-linked retinopathy due to mutations in the OPN1LW/OPN1MW gene cluster. Symptoms include reduced visual acuity and disturbed color vision. We studied BCM color vision to determine outcome measures for future clinical trials.

Methods

Patients with BCM and normal-vision participants were examined with Farnsworth-Munsell (FM) arrangement tests and the Color Assessment and Diagnosis (CAD) test. A retrospective case series in 36 patients with BCM (ages 6-70) was performed with the FM D-15 test. A subset of six patients also had Roth-28 Hue and CAD tests.

Results

All patients with BCM had abnormal results for D-15, Roth-28, and CAD tests. With D-15, there was protan-deutan confusion and no bimodal tendency. Roth-28 results reinforced that finding. There was symmetry in color vision metrics between the two eyes and coherence between sessions with the arrangement tests and CAD. Severe abnormalities in red-green sensitivity with CAD were expected. Unexpected were different levels of yellow-blue results with two patterns of abnormal thresholds: moderate elevation in two younger patients and severe elevation in four patients ≥35 years. Coefficients of repeatability and intersession means were tabulated for all test modalities.

Conclusions

Given understanding of advantages, disadvantages, and complexities of interpretation of results, both an arrangement test and CAD should be useful monitors of color vision through a clinical trial in BCM.

Translational Relevance

Our pilot studies in BCM of arrangement and CAD tests indicated both were clinically feasible and interpretable in the context of this cone gene disease.

Age-related normal limits for spatial vision

PURPOSE

To establish age-related, normal limits of monocular and binocular spatial vision under photopic and mesopic conditions.

METHODS

Photopic and mesopic visual acuity (VA) and contrast thresholds (CTs) were measured with both positive and negative contrast optotypes under binocular and monocular viewing conditions using the Acuity-Plus (AP) test. The experiments were carried out on participants (age range from 10 to 86 years), who met pre-established, normal sight criteria. Mean and ± 2.5σ limits were calculated within each 5-year subgroup. A biologically meaningful model was then fitted to predict mean values and upper and lower threshold limits for VA and CT as a function of age. The best-fit model parameters describe normal aging of spatial vision for each of the 16 experimental conditions investigated.

RESULTS

Out of the 382 participants recruited for this study, 285 participants passed the selection criteria for normal aging. Log transforms were applied to ensure approximate normal distributions. Outliers were also removed for each of the 16 stimulus conditions investigated based on the ±2.5σ limit criterion. VA, CTs and the overall variability were found to be age-invariant up to ~50 years in the photopic condition. A lower, age-invariant limit of ~30 years was more appropriate for the mesopic range with a gradual, but accelerating increase in both mean thresholds and intersubject variability above this age. Binocular thresholds were smaller and much less variable when compared to the thresholds measured in either eye. Results with negative contrast optotypes were significantly better than the corresponding results measured with positive contrast (p < 0.004).

CONCLUSIONS

This project has established the expected age limits of spatial vision for monocular and binocular viewing under photopic and high mesopic lighting with both positive and negative contrast optotypes using a single test, which can be implemented either in the clinic or in an occupational setting.

Chromatic and flicker threshold changes in age-related macular degeneration following anti-VEGF treatment

Clinical relevance: Red-green chromatic sensitivity and photopic (cone-mediated) flicker sensitivity showed marked improvement after anti-VEGF treatment. The use of flicker and chromatic sensitivities as potential functional tests to monitor treatment outcomes in age-related macular degeneration highlights the clinical importance.Background: High-contrast visual acuity (VA) is not a sensitive clinical marker in the management of age-related macular degeneration (AMD). Therefore, flicker and chromatic sensitivity changes were assessed following anti-VEGF treatment in subjects with neovascular AMD.Methods: Subjects diagnosed with neovascular AMD were recruited. VA was measured using a COMPlog chart. Flicker (in central 5°) and chromatic thresholds (red-green and yellow-blue) were measured using Flicker-plus test and Colour Assessment and Diagnosis (CAD) tests, respectively. Baseline thresholds and foveal thickness were measured on the same day, just before anti-VEGF injection delivery and 5 weeks ± 5 days later.Results: Thirteen subjects (8 males, 5 females) with a mean age of 67.5 ± 8.2 years completed the study. Median VA was not significantly different post-treatment (0.57 logMAR [~6/22: Snellen equivalent], IQR: 0.33) compared to baseline (0.56 logMAR, IQR: 0.33), Wilcoxon matched-pair test, p = 0.55). Median Red-Green thresholds improved significantly post-treatment (22.15 CAD units, IQR: 26.06, n = 9), compared to baseline (24.24 CAD units, IQR: 26.21, p = 0.02). Median photopic and mesopic FMT did not show significant change post treatment compared to baseline (p > 0.01, statistical significance of p-value corrected for multiple comparisons was set to 0.01). Similarly, the foveal thickness was not significantly different at post-treatment visit than baseline (p = 0.53).Conclusion: Red/green sensitivity recovered better than yellow/blue sensitivity, thus, providing insight into recovery mechanisms in AMD and usefulness of these tests as clinical markers in the management of AMD.

Intravitreal Dexamethasone Implant as a Sustained Release Drug Delivery Device for the Treatment of Ocular Diseases: A Comprehensive Review of the Literature

Drug delivery into the vitreous chamber remains a great challenge in the pharmaceutical industry due to the complex anatomy and physiology of the eye. Intravitreal injection is the mainstream route of drug administration to the posterior segment of the eye. The purpose of this review is to assess the current literature about the widening use of the intravitreal 0.7 mg dexamethasone (Dex) implant, and to provide a comprehensive collection of all the ocular disorders that benefit from Dex administration. Although anti-vascular endothelial growth-factors (VEGFs) have been largely indicated as a first-choice level, the Dex implant represents an important treatment option, especially in selected cases, such as vitrectomized eyes or patients in whom anti-VEGF failed or are contraindicated. In this article, the safety profile as well as the list of the possible complications related to intravitreal Dex injection are also discussed.