1
|
Chen L, Sleeman KE, Bradshaw A, Sakharang W, Mo Y, Ellis-Smith C. The Use of Person-Centered Outcome Measures to Support Integrated Palliative Care for Older People: A Systematic Review. J Am Med Dir Assoc 2024; 25:105036. [PMID: 38796168 DOI: 10.1016/j.jamda.2024.105036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/12/2023] [Revised: 04/09/2024] [Accepted: 04/10/2024] [Indexed: 05/28/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The aim was to synthesize evidence on the use of person-centered outcome measures to facilitate integrated palliative care for older people and build a logic model depicting the mechanisms through which person-centered outcome measures support integrated care. DESIGN Mixed methods systematic review using a data-based convergent synthesis design. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS Older people aged ≥60 years who are approaching the end of their lives in multiple settings. METHODS The study was underpinned by a conceptual framework of integrated palliative care, which informed the search strategy, data extraction, analysis, and synthesis. A hybrid search strategy was implemented, with database searches (PsycINFO, MEDLINE, CINAHL, and ASSIA) complemented by snowball searches. Qualitative and quantitative data were analyzed by narrative synthesis to summarize and explain the findings. The findings informed a logic model depicting the mechanisms of using person-centered outcome measures to support integrated palliative care. RESULTS Twenty-six studies were included. Three mixed methods studies, 2 qualitative studies, and 21 quantitative studies were included. There was evidence that person-centered outcome measures could support integrated palliative care through informing palliative care policy development (n = 4), facilitating joint working across settings (n = 5), enabling close collaboration of multidisciplinary teams (n = 14), promoting joint education (n = 1), facilitating timing and specialist referral (n = 6), and enhancing patient-centered care (n = 3). CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS This review makes an important, novel, and theoretically informed contribution to the delivery of scalable and sustainable integrated palliative care into the care of older people using person-centered outcome measures. The constructed logic model provides a conceptual framework and practical approach to how person-centered outcome measures support multilevel integration. A future area of research is the development of person-centered outcome measure interventions informed by the logic model to meet clinical needs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Linghui Chen
- Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery and Palliative Care, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
| | - Katherine E Sleeman
- Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery and Palliative Care, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Andy Bradshaw
- Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery and Palliative Care, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Wilailak Sakharang
- Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery and Palliative Care, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Yihan Mo
- Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery and Palliative Care, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Clare Ellis-Smith
- Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery and Palliative Care, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
de Bell S, Zhelev Z, Bethel A, Coon JT, Anderson R. Factors influencing effective data sharing between health care and social care regarding the care of older people: a qualitative evidence synthesis. HEALTH AND SOCIAL CARE DELIVERY RESEARCH 2024; 12:1-87. [PMID: 38778710 DOI: 10.3310/ttwg4738] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/25/2024]
Abstract
Background Sharing data about patients between health and social care organisations and professionals, such as details of their medication, is essential to provide co-ordinated and person-centred care. While professionals can share data in a number of ways - for example, through shared electronic record systems or multidisciplinary team meetings - there are many factors that make sharing data across the health and social care boundary difficult. These include professional hierarchies, inaccessible electronic systems and concerns around confidentiality. Data-sharing is particularly important for the care of older people, as they are more likely to have multiple or long-term conditions; understanding is needed on how to enable effective data-sharing. Objectives To identify factors perceived as influencing effective data-sharing, including the successful adoption of interventions to improve data-sharing, between healthcare and social care organisations and professionals regarding the care of older people. Methods MEDLINE and seven further databases were searched (in March 2023) for qualitative and mixed-methods studies. Relevant websites were searched and citation-chasing completed on included studies. Studies were included if they focused on older people, as defined by the study, and data-sharing, defined as the transfer of information between healthcare and social care organisations, or care professionals, regarding a patient, and were conducted in the United Kingdom. Purposive sampling was used to obtain a final set of studies which were analysed using framework synthesis. Quality appraisal was conducted using the Wallace checklist. Stakeholder and public and patient involvement groups were consulted throughout the project. Results Twenty-four studies were included; most scored highly on the quality appraisal checklist. Four main themes were identified. Within Goals, we found five purposes of data-sharing: joint (health and social care) assessment, integrated case management, transitions from hospital to home, for residents of care homes, and for palliative care. In Relationships, building interprofessional relationships, and therefore trust and respect, between professionals supported data-sharing, while the presence of professional prejudices and mistrust hindered it. Interorganisational Processes and procedures, such as a shared vision of care and operationalisation of formal agreements, for example data governance, supported data-sharing. Within Technology and infrastructure, the use of technology as a tool supported data-sharing, as did professionals' awareness of the wider care system. There were also specific factors influencing data-sharing related to its purpose; for example, there was a lack of legal frameworks in the area of palliative care. Limitations Data-sharing was usually discussed in the context of wider initiatives, for example integrated care, which meant the information provided was often limited. The COVID-19 pandemic has had significant impacts on ways of working; none of our included studies were conducted during or since the pandemic. Conclusions Our findings indicate the importance of building interprofessional relationships and ensuring that professionals are able to share data in multiple ways. Future work Exploration of the impact of new technologies and ways of working adopted as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic on data-sharing is needed. Additionally, research should explore patient experience and the prevention of digital exclusion among health and social care professionals. Study registration The protocol was registered on PROSPERO CRD42023416621. Funding This award was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health and Social Care Delivery Research programme (NIHR award ref: NIHR135660), as part of a series of evidence syntheses under award NIHR130538, and is published in full in Health and Social Care Delivery Research; Vol. 12, No. 12. See the NIHR Funding and Awards website for further award information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Siân de Bell
- Exeter HS&DR Evidence Synthesis Centre, Department of Health and Community Sciences, University of Exeter Medical School, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Zhivko Zhelev
- Exeter HS&DR Evidence Synthesis Centre, Department of Health and Community Sciences, University of Exeter Medical School, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Alison Bethel
- Exeter HS&DR Evidence Synthesis Centre, Department of Health and Community Sciences, University of Exeter Medical School, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Jo Thompson Coon
- Exeter HS&DR Evidence Synthesis Centre, Department of Health and Community Sciences, University of Exeter Medical School, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Rob Anderson
- Exeter HS&DR Evidence Synthesis Centre, Department of Health and Community Sciences, University of Exeter Medical School, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Aworinde J, Evans CJ, Gillam J, Ramsenthaler C, Davies N, Ellis‐Smith C. Co-design of the EMBED-Care Framework as an intervention to enhance shared decision-making for people affected by dementia and practitioners, comprising holistic assessment, linked with clinical decision support tools: A qualitative study. Health Expect 2024; 27:e13987. [PMID: 38343168 PMCID: PMC10859658 DOI: 10.1111/hex.13987] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2023] [Revised: 01/17/2024] [Accepted: 01/27/2024] [Indexed: 02/15/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Shared decision-making intends to align care provision with individuals' preferences. However, the involvement of people living with dementia in decision-making about their care varies. We aimed to co-design the EMBED-Care Framework, to enhance shared decision-making between people affected by dementia and practitioners. METHODS A theory and evidence driven co-design study was conducted, using iterative workshops, informed by a theoretical model of shared decision-making and the EMBED-Care Framework (the intervention) for person-centred holistic palliative dementia care. The intervention incorporates a holistic outcome measure for assessment and review, linked with clinical decision-support tools to support shared decision-making. We drew on the Medical Research Council (MRC) guidance for developing and evaluating complex interventions. Participants included people with dementia of any type, current or bereaved family carers and practitioners. We recruited via established dementia groups and research and clinical networks. Data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis to explore how and when the intervention could enhance communication and shared decision-making, and the requirements for use, presented as a logic model. RESULTS Five co-design workshops were undertaken with participants comprising people affected by dementia (n = 18) and practitioners (n = 36). Three themes were generated, comprising: (1) 'knowing the person and personalisation of care', involving the person with dementia and/or family carer identifying the needs of the person using a holistic assessment. (2) 'engaging and considering the perspectives of all involved in decision-making' required listening to the person and the family to understand their priorities, and to manage multiple preferences. (3) 'Training and support activities' to use the Framework through use of animated videos to convey information, such as to understand the outcome measure used to assess symptoms. CONCLUSIONS The intervention developed sought to enhance shared decision-making with individuals affected by dementia and practitioners, through increased shared knowledge of individual priorities and choices for care and treatment. The workshops generated understanding to manage disagreements in determining priorities. Practitioners require face-to-face training on the intervention, and on communication to manage sensitive conversations about symptoms, care and treatment with individuals and their family. The findings informed the construction of a logic model to illustrate how the intervention is intended to work.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jesutofunmi Aworinde
- Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy and RehabilitationKing's College LondonLondonUK
| | - Catherine J. Evans
- Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy and RehabilitationKing's College LondonLondonUK
- Sussex Community NHS Foundation TrustBrightonUK
| | - Juliet Gillam
- Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy and RehabilitationKing's College LondonLondonUK
| | - Christina Ramsenthaler
- Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy and RehabilitationKing's College LondonLondonUK
- Department of Health SciencesZurich University of Applied Sciences (ZHAW)WinterthurSwitzerland
- Hull York Medical School, Wolfson Palliative Care Research CentreUniversity of HullHullEngland
| | - Nathan Davies
- Research Department of Primary Care and Population HealthCentre for Aging Population Studies, University College LondonLondonUK
| | - Clare Ellis‐Smith
- Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy and RehabilitationKing's College LondonLondonUK
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Howard FD, Green R, Harris J, Ross J, Nicholson C. Understanding the extent to which PROMs and PREMs used with older people with severe frailty capture their multidimensional needs: A scoping review. Palliat Med 2024; 38:184-199. [PMID: 38268061 PMCID: PMC10865766 DOI: 10.1177/02692163231223089] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/26/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Older people with severe frailty are nearing the end of life but their needs are often unknown and unmet. Systematic ways to capture and measure the needs of this group are required. Patient reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) & Patient reported Experience Measures (PREMs) are possible tools to assist this. AIM To establish whether, and in what ways, the needs of older people living with severe frailty are represented within existing PROMs and PREMs and to examine the extent to which the measures have been validated with this patient group. DESIGN The scoping review follows the method of Arksey and O'Malley. RESULTS Seventeen papers from 9 countries meeting the inclusion criteria and 18 multi-dimensional measures were identified: 17 PROMs, and 1 PROM with PREM elements. Seven out of the 18 measures had evidence of being tested for validity with those with frailty. No measure was developed specifically for a frail population. Using the adapted framework of palliative need, five measures covered all five domains of palliative need (IPOS, ICECAP-SCM, PDI, WHOQOL-BREF, WHOQOL-OLD). The coverage of items within the domains varied between the measures. CONCLUSION Existing PROMs and PREMs are not well designed for what we know about the needs of older people with severe frailty. Future research should firstly focus on adapting and validating the existing measures to ensure they are fit for purpose, and secondly on developing a better understanding of how measures are used to deliver/better person-centred care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Faith D Howard
- Department of Health Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK
| | - Richard Green
- Department of Health Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK
| | - Jenny Harris
- Department of Health Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK
| | - Joy Ross
- St Christopher’s Hospice, London, UK
| | - Caroline Nicholson
- Department of Health Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK
- St Christopher’s Hospice, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Wolverson E, Appleyard S, Stirland S, Gower Z. The palliative care symptoms of people with dementia on admission to a mental health ward. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 2023; 38:e5995. [PMID: 37681496 DOI: 10.1002/gps.5995] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/09/2023]
Abstract
Key points
When patients with dementia are admitted to a mental health ward it is important to undertake a thorough assessment of palliative care needs.
The Integrated Palliative care Outcome Scale for Dementia can support the assessment and management of palliative care symptoms and concerns in mental health wards.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emma Wolverson
- Dementia UK, London, UK
- Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Hull, Hull, UK
| | - Sara Appleyard
- Department of Clinical Psychology for Older People, Humber Teaching NHS Foundation Trust, Hull, UK
| | - Sarah Stirland
- Department of Clinical Psychology for Older People, Humber Teaching NHS Foundation Trust, Hull, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Spichiger F, Volken T, Larkin P, Meichtry AA, Koppitz A. Inter-rating reliability of the Swiss easy-read integrated palliative care outcome scale for people with dementia. PLoS One 2023; 18:e0286557. [PMID: 37531385 PMCID: PMC10395940 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0286557] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2022] [Accepted: 05/10/2023] [Indexed: 08/04/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Integrated Palliative Care Outcome Scale for People with Dementia is a promising instrument for nursing home quality improvement and research in dementia care. It enables frontline staff in nursing homes to understand and rate the needs and concerns of people with dementia. We recently adapted the measure to include easy language for users from various educational backgrounds. OBJECTIVES In this study, we examine the inter-rating reliability of the Integrated Palliative Care Outcome Scale for People with Dementia for frontline staff in nursing homes. METHODS In this secondary analysis of an experimental study, 317 frontline staff members in 23 Swiss nursing homes assessed 240 people with dementia from a convenience sample. Reliability for individual items was computed using Fleiss Kappa. Because of the nested nature of the primary data, a generalisability and dependability study was performed for an experimental IPOS-Dem sum score. RESULTS The individual Integrated Palliative Care Outcome Scale for People with Dementia items showed kappa values between .38 (95% CI .3-.48) and .15 (95% CI .08-.22). For the experimental IPOS-Dem sum score, a dependability index of .57 was found. The different ratings and time between ratings explain less than 2% of the variance in the sum score. The different nursing homes make up 12% and the people with dementia make up 43% of the sum score variance. The dependability study indicates that an experimental IPOS-Dem sum score could be acceptable for research by averaging two ratings. CONCLUSION Limited research has been conducted on the measurement error and reliability of patient-centred outcome measures for people with dementia who are living in nursing homes. The Swiss Easy-Read IPOS-Dem is a promising instrument but requires further improvement to be reliable for research or decision making. Future studies may look at its measurement properties for different rater populations or at different stages of dementia. Furthermore, there is a need to establish the construct validity and internal consistency of the easy-read IPOS-Dem.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Frank Spichiger
- UNIL, Institute of Higher Education and Research in Healthcare, Lausanne, Switzerland
- HES-So, School of Health Sciences Fribourg, Switzerland
| | - Thomas Volken
- ZHAW, School of Health Sciences, Winterthur, Switzerland
| | - Philip Larkin
- UNIL, Institute of Higher Education and Research in Healthcare, Lausanne, Switzerland
- Palliative and Supportive Care Service, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - André Anton Meichtry
- School of Health Professionals, Bern University of Applied Sciences, Bern, Switzerland
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Kawashima A, Evans CJ. Needs-based triggers for timely referral to palliative care for older adults severely affected by noncancer conditions: a systematic review and narrative synthesis. BMC Palliat Care 2023; 22:20. [PMID: 36890522 PMCID: PMC9996955 DOI: 10.1186/s12904-023-01131-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2022] [Accepted: 02/01/2023] [Indexed: 03/10/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Older people with noncancer conditions are less likely to be referred to palliative care services due to the inherent uncertain disease trajectory and a lack of standardised referral criteria. For older adults with noncancer conditions where prognostic estimation is unpredictable, needs-based criteria are likely more suitable. Eligibility criteria for participation in clinical trials on palliative care could inform a needs-based criteria. This review aimed to identify and synthesise eligibility criteria for trials in palliative care to construct a needs-based set of triggers for timely referral to palliative care for older adults severely affected by noncancer conditions. METHODS A systematic narrative review of published trials of palliative care service level interventions for older adults with noncancer conditions. Electronic databases Medline, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, CENTRAL, and ClinicalTrials.gov. were searched from inception to June 2022. We included all types of randomised controlled trials. We selected trials that reported eligibility criteria for palliative care involvement for older adults with noncancer conditions, where > 50% of the population was aged ≥ 65 years. The methodological quality of the included studies was assessed using a revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials. Descriptive analysis and narrative synthesis provided descriptions of the patterns and appraised the applicability of included trial eligibility criteria to identify patients likely to benefit from receiving palliative care. RESULTS 27 randomised controlled trials met eligibility out of 9,584 papers. We identified six major domains of trial eligibility criteria in three categories, needs-based, time-based and medical history-based criteria. Needs-based criteria were composed of symptoms, functional status, and quality of life criteria. The major trial eligibility criteria were diagnostic criteria (n = 26, 96%), followed by medical history-based criteria (n = 15, 56%), and physical and psychological symptom criteria (n = 14, 52%). CONCLUSION For older adults severely affected by noncancer conditions, decisions about providing palliative care should be based on the present needs related to symptoms, functional status, and quality of life. Further research is needed to examine how the needs-based triggers can be operationalized as referral criteria in clinical settings and develop international consensus on referral criteria for older adults with noncancer conditions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arisa Kawashima
- Department of Nursing for Advanced Practice, Division of Integrated Health Sciences, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan.,King's College London, Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery and Palliative Care, London, UK
| | - Catherine J Evans
- King's College London, Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery and Palliative Care, London, UK. .,Sussex Community NHS Foundation Trust, Brighton, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Gillam J, Evans C, Aworinde J, Ellis-Smith C, Ross J, Davies N. Co-design of a theory-based implementation plan for a holistic eHealth assessment and decision support framework for people with dementia in care homes. Digit Health 2023; 9:20552076231211118. [PMID: 38033518 PMCID: PMC10685752 DOI: 10.1177/20552076231211118] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2023] [Accepted: 10/13/2023] [Indexed: 12/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Despite positive findings around the use of eHealth in dementia care, it is rarely translated into routine practice. This can be facilitated by early involvement of end-users in the development of an implementation plan. This study aimed to co-design strategies to implement an eHealth intervention, the EMBED-Care Framework, to support assessment and decision-making for people with dementia in care homes. Methods A qualitative co-design method was applied through a series of workshops. Participants included family carers and health and social care practitioners. People with dementia were included through a series of stakeholder engagement meetings. The workshops focused on co-developing strategies in response to identified determinants of implementation. A codebook thematic analytic approach was taken, guided by the Normalisation Process Theory (NPT). Results Three workshops were conducted from July 2021 to November 2021, attended by 39 participants. Three overarching phases of implementation were identified which aligned with the constructs of the NPT: (a) incentivising adoption of the Framework, which requires promotion of its benefits and alignment with recommendations for good quality dementia care to engage stakeholders, relating to 'coherence' and 'cognitive participation' constructs; (b) enabling its operation, which requires ensuring compatibility with care home processes, provision of training and support from 'champions', relating to 'collective action'; (c) sustaining use of the Framework, which requires monitoring of implementation and appraisal of its effects, relating to 'reflexive monitoring'. Conclusions We have developed a multi-strategy, theoretically driven plan to implement eHealth to support assessment and decision-making for people with dementia in care homes. Successful implementation requires incentivisation to adopt, ability to operate and motivation to sustain use of eHealth. The plan is strengthened through collaborating with end-users to increase its value, credibility and real-world relevance. The theoretically informed strategies target mechanisms of the NPT, demonstrated to shape the implementation process and outcomes, ready for testing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juliet Gillam
- Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery & Palliative Care, Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Catherine Evans
- Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery & Palliative Care, Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, King's College London, London, UK
- Brighton General Hospital, Sussex Community NHS Foundation Trust, Brighton, UK
| | - Jesutofunmi Aworinde
- Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery & Palliative Care, Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Clare Ellis-Smith
- Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery & Palliative Care, Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Jamie Ross
- Centre for Primary Care, Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Nathan Davies
- Centre for Ageing Population Studies, Research Department of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Eltaybani S, Yasaka T, Fukui C, Inagaki A, Takaoka M, Suzuki H, Maruyama M, Igarashi A, Noguchi-Watanabe M, Sakka M, Weller C, Yamamoto-Mitani N. Family-oriented interventions in long-term care residential facilities for older people: A scoping review of the characteristics and outcomes. Nurs Forum 2022; 57:800-818. [PMID: 35810335 DOI: 10.1111/nuf.12768] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2021] [Revised: 04/17/2022] [Accepted: 06/01/2022] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Family-oriented interventions in long-term care (LTC) residential facilities are heterogenous in design, characteristics, and outcomes. OBJECTIVES To synthesize characteristics (e.g., type, provider, and duration) and outcomes of family-oriented interventions in LTC residential facilities. METHODS We followed the JBI methodology and searched seven databases for quantitative, qualitative, and mixed method studies that reported family-oriented interventions in LTC residential settings for older people; defined in this review as ≥60 years. Interventions that included residents, resident families, health professionals, or any combinations of these three were included if the study reported post-intervention assessment of at least one family-related outcome. RESULTS Thirteen studies met the inclusion criteria. Interventions were found to be multifaceted, and education was the most common element. Nurses were the most common intervenors, and most interventions had more than one target (residents, resident families, or staff). Most outcomes were related to family involvement, satisfaction with care, quality of life, communication, symptom management, and shared decision making, and none of the studies reported a negative impact. CONCLUSIONS Family-oriented interventions were associated with high care quality and better resident-staff-family partnership. Staff education and staff-family conversation are relatively cheap interventions to help family involvement, facilitate shared decision-making, and improve family satisfaction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sameh Eltaybani
- Department of Gerontological Home Care and Long-term Care Nursing, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Taisuke Yasaka
- Department of Gerontological Home Care and Long-term Care Nursing, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Chie Fukui
- Department of Gerontological Home Care and Long-term Care Nursing, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Asa Inagaki
- Department of Gerontological Home Care and Long-term Care Nursing, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Manami Takaoka
- Department of Gerontological Home Care and Long-term Care Nursing, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Haruno Suzuki
- Department of Gerontological Home Care and Long-term Care Nursing, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Miyuki Maruyama
- Department of Gerontological Home Care and Long-term Care Nursing, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Ayumi Igarashi
- Department of Gerontological Home Care and Long-term Care Nursing, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Maiko Noguchi-Watanabe
- Department of Gerontological Home Care and Long-term Care Nursing, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
- Department of Home Care Nursing, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Mariko Sakka
- Department of Gerontological Home Care and Long-term Care Nursing, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Carolina Weller
- School of Nursing and Midwifery Monash University, Monash, Australia
| | - Noriko Yamamoto-Mitani
- Department of Gerontological Home Care and Long-term Care Nursing, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Leniz J, Gulliford M, Higginson IJ, Bajwah S, Yi D, Gao W, Sleeman KE. Primary care contacts, continuity, identification of palliative care needs, and hospital use: a population-based cohort study in people dying with dementia. Br J Gen Pract 2022; 72:BJGP.2021.0715. [PMID: 35817583 PMCID: PMC9282808 DOI: 10.3399/bjgp.2021.0715] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2021] [Accepted: 03/02/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Reducing hospital admissions among people dying with dementia is a policy priority. AIM To explore associations between primary care contacts, continuity of primary care, identification of palliative care needs, and unplanned hospital admissions among people dying with dementia. DESIGN AND SETTING This was a retrospective cohort study using the Clinical Practice Research Datalink linked with hospital records and Office for National Statistics data. Adults (>18 years) who died between 2009 and 2018 with a diagnosis of dementia were included in the study. METHOD The association between GP contacts, Herfindahl-Hirschman Index continuity of care score, palliative care needs identification before the last 90 days of life, and multiple unplanned hospital admissions in the last 90 days was evaluated using random-effects Poisson regression. RESULTS In total, 33 714 decedents with dementia were identified: 64.1% (n = 21 623) female, mean age 86.6 years (SD 8.1), mean comorbidities 2.2 (SD 1.6). Of these, 1894 (5.6%) had multiple hospital admissions in the last 90 days of life (increase from 4.9%, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 4.2 to 5.6 in 2009 to 7.1%, 95% CI = 5.7 to 8.4 in 2018). Participants with more GP contacts had higher risk of multiple hospital admissions (incidence risk ratio [IRR] 1.08, 95% CI = 1.05 to 1.11). Higher continuity of care scores (IRR 0.79, 95% CI = 0.68 to 0.92) and identification of palliative care needs (IRR 0.66, 95% CI = 0.56 to 0.78) were associated with lower frequency of these admissions. CONCLUSION Multiple hospital admissions among people dying with dementia are increasing. Higher continuity of care and identification of palliative care needs are associated with a lower risk of multiple hospital admissions in this population, and might help prevent these admissions at the end of life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Javiera Leniz
- NIHR clinician scientist and honorary consultant in palliative medicine, Cicely Saunders Institute for Palliative Care, Policy & Rehabilitation, Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery & Palliative Care, King's College London, London
| | - Martin Gulliford
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Faculty of Life Science & Medicine, King's College London, London
| | - Irene J Higginson
- NIHR clinician scientist and honorary consultant in palliative medicine, Cicely Saunders Institute for Palliative Care, Policy & Rehabilitation, Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery & Palliative Care, King's College London, London
| | - Sabrina Bajwah
- NIHR clinician scientist and honorary consultant in palliative medicine, Cicely Saunders Institute for Palliative Care, Policy & Rehabilitation, Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery & Palliative Care, King's College London, London
| | - Deokhee Yi
- NIHR clinician scientist and honorary consultant in palliative medicine, Cicely Saunders Institute for Palliative Care, Policy & Rehabilitation, Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery & Palliative Care, King's College London, London
| | - Wei Gao
- NIHR clinician scientist and honorary consultant in palliative medicine, Cicely Saunders Institute for Palliative Care, Policy & Rehabilitation, Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery & Palliative Care, King's College London, London
| | - Katherine E Sleeman
- NIHR clinician scientist and honorary consultant in palliative medicine, Cicely Saunders Institute for Palliative Care, Policy & Rehabilitation, Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery & Palliative Care, King's College London, London
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Martinsson L, Sahlén KG. Translation and cultural adaptation of the Integrated Palliative care Outcome Scale for Dementia (IPOS-Dem) to Swedish. BMC Nurs 2022; 21:78. [PMID: 35365128 PMCID: PMC8975724 DOI: 10.1186/s12912-022-00859-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2021] [Accepted: 03/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Systematic assessment tools are helpful for improving and maintaining quality of care. The Integrated Palliative care Outcome Scale (IPOS) was developed for systematic assessment of persons receiving palliative care in a patient-centred way. A version of this tool, the Integrated Palliative care Outcome Scale for Dementia (IPOS-Dem), has been developed for patients with dementia. The aim of this study was to develop a version of the IPOS-Dem translated into Swedish and culturally adapted to a Swedish care setting. METHODS Forward and backward translations from English into Swedish were performed to develop a first Swedish version. This version was modified for clarity and cultural adaptation based on 13 interviews with nurses and assistant nurses working in geriatrics and dementia care homes. RESULTS The interview process revealed several issues with the first version that emerged from the translation process. This was changed and further tested to work well, resulting in the final version of the Swedish IPOS-Dem. The tool was perceived as clinically useful but somewhat overlapping with already implemented tools for assessing behavioural and psychological symptoms in dementia. CONCLUSION The Swedish version of the IPOS-Dem can now be used as a tool for assessing palliative care related problems and concerns for persons with advanced dementia. Future studies can focus on implementation as well as examining validity and reliability of this tool in a Swedish context.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lisa Martinsson
- Department of Radiation Sciences, Umeå University, 901 87, Umeå, Sweden.
| | - Klas-Göran Sahlén
- Epidemiology and Global Health, Umeå University, 901 87, Umeå, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Spichiger F, Keller Senn A, Volken T, Larkin P, Koppitz A. Integrated Palliative Outcome Scale for People with Dementia: easy language adaption and translation. J Patient Rep Outcomes 2022; 6:14. [PMID: 35169943 PMCID: PMC8847462 DOI: 10.1186/s41687-022-00420-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2021] [Accepted: 02/03/2022] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Background In this article, we report the cultural adaption and translation of the Integrated Palliative Care Outcome Scale for People with Dementia (IPOS-Dem) into a Swiss-German easy language version for proxy assessment of people with dementia living in Swiss nursing homes. The Swiss-German easy language version of the IPOS-Dem was developed and culturally adapted in a six-phase process from the German IPOS-Dem using recommended guidelines. With nursing home staff and laypeople, the conceptual definition and relevance of IPOS-Dem items were established during phase I. Phase II encompassed the completion of forward translations. Independent native speakers blind to the original scale translated and back-translated the Swiss-German easy language version. The resulting IPOS-Dem version was then blindly back-translated in phase III. Experts reviewed all resulting translations in phase IV to produce a pre-final IPOS-Dem version. Finally, the phase V cognitive debriefing involved two focus groups assessing the pre-final IPOS-Dem version. Phase V included cognitive interviews with laypeople (n = 2), family members of those with dementia (n = 4) and staff from different care contexts (n = 12). Results Using easy language specialists yielded a clinically relevant, comprehensive and understandable translation. In addition, face and content validity for the easy language version were established in the cognitive interviews. Conclusions With an easy language IPOS-Dem, all frontline staff and family members can be empowered to communicate their observations after caring interactions. Enhanced clinical communication with easy language tools shows the potential for research and clinical applications. In addition, attentive use in scales of easy language communication may foster increased engagement with untrained laypeople in clinical and care research. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s41687-022-00420-7.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Frank Spichiger
- School of Health Sciences Fribourg, HES-SO
- University of Applied Science and Arts Western Switzerland, Fribourg, Switzerland. .,Institute of Nursing, Faculty of Biology and Medicine, UNIL
- University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
| | - Anita Keller Senn
- School of Health Sciences Fribourg, HES-SO
- University of Applied Science and Arts Western Switzerland, Fribourg, Switzerland.,Department of Endocrinology and Diabetology, KSW
- Cantonal Hospital Winterthur, Winterthur, Switzerland
| | - Thomas Volken
- Institute of Health Science, School of Health Professions, ZHAW, Zurich University of Applied Science, Winterthur, Switzerland
| | - Philip Larkin
- Institute of Nursing, Faculty of Biology and Medicine, UNIL
- University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.,CHUV, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Andrea Koppitz
- School of Health Sciences Fribourg, HES-SO
- University of Applied Science and Arts Western Switzerland, Fribourg, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Aworinde J, Ellis‐Smith C, Gillam J, Roche M, Coombes L, Yorganci E, Evans CJ. How do person‐centered outcome measures enable shared decision‐making for people with dementia and family carers?—A systematic review. ALZHEIMER'S & DEMENTIA: TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCH & CLINICAL INTERVENTIONS 2022; 8:e12304. [PMID: 35676942 PMCID: PMC9169867 DOI: 10.1002/trc2.12304] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2021] [Revised: 04/15/2022] [Accepted: 04/20/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
Objectives To identify published evidence on person‐centered outcome measures (PCOMs) used in dementia care and to explore how PCOMs facilitate shared decision‐making and improve outcomes of care. To build a logic model based on the findings, depicting linkages with PCOM impact mechanisms and care outcomes. Design Mixed‐methods systematic review. We searched PsycINFO, MEDLINE, CINAHL, and ASSIA from databases and included studies reporting experiences and/or impact of PCOM use among people with dementia, family carers, and/or practitioners. Groen Van de Ven's model of collaborative deliberation informed the elements of shared decision‐making in dementia care in the abstraction, analysis, and interpretation of data. Data were narratively synthesized to develop the logic model. Setting Studies were conducted in long‐term care, mixed settings, emergency department, general primary care, and geriatric clinics. Participants A total of 1064 participants were included in the review. Results Ten studies were included. PCOMs can facilitate shared decision‐making through “knowing the person,” “identifying problems, priorities for care and treatment and goal setting,” “evaluating decisions”, and “implementation considerations for PCOM use.” Weak evidence on the impact of PCOMs to improve communication between individuals and practitioners, physical function, and activities of daily living. Conclusions PCOMs can enable shared decision‐making and impact outcomes through facilitating collaborative working between the person's network of family and practitioners to identify and manage symptoms and concerns. The constructed logic model demonstrates the key mechanisms to discuss priorities for care and treatment, and to evaluate decisions and outcomes. A future area of research is training for family carers to use PCOMs with practitioners.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jesutofunmi Aworinde
- Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy & Rehabilitation King's College London London UK
| | - Clare Ellis‐Smith
- Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy & Rehabilitation King's College London London UK
| | - Juliet Gillam
- Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy & Rehabilitation King's College London London UK
| | - Moïse Roche
- Division of Psychiatry University College London London UK
| | - Lucy Coombes
- Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy & Rehabilitation King's College London London UK
- The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust Sutton UK
| | - Emel Yorganci
- Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy & Rehabilitation King's College London London UK
| | - Catherine J. Evans
- Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy & Rehabilitation King's College London London UK
- Sussex Community NHS Foundation Trust Brighton UK
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Kebebew T, Mavhandu-Mudzusi AH, Mosalo A. A cross-sectional assessment of symptom burden among patients with advanced cervical cancer. BMC Palliat Care 2021; 20:190. [PMID: 34920716 PMCID: PMC8684193 DOI: 10.1186/s12904-021-00883-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2021] [Accepted: 11/15/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The increasing burden of chronic non-communicable diseases in developing countries is driving attention to palliative care services. Identification of disease-specific symptoms of concern and their prevalence will guide designing, monitoring, and evaluating palliative care programmes. This study assessed the burden of symptoms and problems among patients with advanced cervical cancer. Methods This research followed a cross-sectional study design to quantitatively review the symptom burden among patients diagnosed with advanced cervical cancer attending treatment at Tikur Anbessa Specialised Hospital, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia from January to July 2019. Symptoms were assessed using a patient-reported, seven-day recall Integrated Palliative Care Outcome Scale (IPOS) version III. Frequency, median and mean scores with a standard deviation were used in the descriptive analysis whereas t-test and one-way analysis of variance were used for comparisons. Results There were 385 patients with advanced cervical cancer, stage IIB-IVB, successfully interviewed. The median age was 50 years, the majority were illiterate (63.1%) and in marital union (62.3%). Over 50% of the patients experienced pain, weakness, poor appetite, constipation, limited mobility, and dry mouth. The burdens of emotional symptoms such as patient anxiety, family anxiety, and patient depression were also prevalent at 79.7%, 82.3%, and 47.0%, respectively. Patients who are illiterate, at a higher stage of the disease, not currently in marriage, and who received palliative radiotherapy bear a higher symptom burden. Conclusion Patients with advanced cervical cancer bear a high symptom burden. Early initiation of palliative care is recommended to alleviate the concerning symptoms, and to improve patients’ quality of life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tolcha Kebebew
- Student at University of South Africa, Ethiopia Learning Centre, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
| | | | - Annah Mosalo
- Department of Health Studies, University of South Africa, Pretoria, South Africa
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Hayward JK, Gould C, Palluotto E, Kitson E, Fisher ER, Spector A. Interventions promoting family involvement with care homes following placement of a relative with dementia: A systematic review. DEMENTIA 2021; 21:618-647. [PMID: 34894796 PMCID: PMC8811321 DOI: 10.1177/14713012211046595] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
There is a wealth of literature investigating the role of family involvement within care homes following placement of a relative with dementia. This review summarises how family involvement is measured and aims to address two questions: (1) which interventions concerning family involvement have been evaluated? And (2) does family involvement within care homes have a positive effect on a resident’s quality of life and behavioural and psychological symptoms of dementia? After searching and screening on the three major databases PsycINFO, MEDLINE and CINAHL Plus for papers published between January 2005 and May 2021, 22 papers were included for synthesis and appraisal due to their relevance to family involvement interventions and or family involvement with resident outcomes. Results show that in 11 interventions designed to enhance at least one type of family involvement, most found positive changes in communication and family–staff relationships. Improvement in resident behavioural and psychological symptoms of dementia was reported in two randomised controlled trials promoting partnership. Visit frequency was associated with a reduction of behavioural and psychological symptoms of dementia for residents with moderate dementia. Family involvement was related to positive quality of life benefits for residents. Contrasting results and methodological weaknesses in some studies made definitive conclusions difficult. Few interventions to specifically promote family involvement within care homes following placement of a relative with dementia have been evaluated. Many proposals for further research made over a decade ago by Gaugler (2005) have yet to be extensively pursued. Uncertainty remains about how best to facilitate an optimum level and type of family involvement to ensure significant quality of life and behavioural and psychological symptoms of dementia benefits for residents with dementia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Janine K Hayward
- Research Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, 4919University College London, London, UK
| | - Charlotte Gould
- Department of Psychology, 3162Royal Holloway, University of London, Egham, UK
| | - Emma Palluotto
- Department of Clinical Psychology, 4917University of East London, London, UK
| | - Emily Kitson
- Department of People and Organisations, 411270Surrey Business School, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK
| | - Emily R Fisher
- Research Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, 4919University College London, London, UK
| | - Aimee Spector
- Research Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, 4919University College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Sakurai H, Miyashita M, Morita T, Naito AS, Miyamoto S, Otani H, Nozato J, Yokomichi N, Imai K, Oishi A, Kizawa Y, Matsushima E. Comparison between patient-reported and clinician-reported outcomes: Validation of the Japanese version of the Integrated Palliative care Outcome Scale for staff. Palliat Support Care 2021; 19:702-708. [PMID: 33666153 DOI: 10.1017/s1478951521000018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The goal of palliative and supportive care is to improve patients' quality of life (QoL). Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are the gold standard for the assessment of QoL and symptoms; however, when self-reporting is complicated, PROMs are often substituted with proxy-reported outcome measures, such as clinician-reported outcome measures. The objective of this study was to assess the validity and reliability of the Japanese version of the Integrated Palliative care Outcome Scale (IPOS) for staff (IPOS-Staff). METHODS This multicenter, cross-sectional observational study was conducted concurrently with the validation of the IPOS for patients (IPOS-Patient). Japanese adult patients with cancer and their staff were recruited. We assessed the characteristics of the patients and staff members, missing values, prevalence, and total IPOS scores. For the analysis of criterion validity, intra-rater, and inter-rater reliability, we calculated intraclass correlations (ICCs). RESULTS One hundred and forty-three patients completed the IPOS-Patient, and 79 medical staff members completed the IPOS-Staff. The most common missing values from IPOS-Staff were Family Anxiety (3.5%) and Sharing Feelings (3.5%). Over half of the patients scored themselves moderate or worse for Poor Mobility, Anxiety, and Family Anxiety, while staff members scored patients moderate or worse for Weakness, Anxiety, and Family Anxiety. For criterion validity (patient-staff agreement) as well as intra-rater and inter-rater reliability, ICCs ranged from 0.114 (Sharing Feelings) to 0.826 (Nausea), 0.720 (Anxiety) to 0.933 (Nausea), and -0.038 (Practical Problems) to 0.830 (Nausea), respectively. SIGNIFICANCE OF RESULTS The IPOS-Staff is easy to respond to; it has fair validity and reliability for physical items but poor for psycho-social items. By defining the context and objectives of its use and interpretation, the IPOS-Staff can be a useful tool for measuring outcomes in adult patients with cancer who cannot complete self-evaluations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hiroki Sakurai
- Department of Palliative Medicine, Toranomon Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Mitsunori Miyashita
- Department of Palliative Nursing and Health Sciences, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan
| | - Tatsuya Morita
- Department of Palliative and Supportive Care, Seirei Mikatahara General Hospital, Hamamatsu, Japan
| | - Akemi Shirado Naito
- Department of Palliative Care, Miyazaki Medical Association Hospital, Miyazaki, Japan
| | - Shingo Miyamoto
- Department of Medical Oncology, Japanese Red Cross Medical Center, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hiroyuki Otani
- Department of Palliative Care Team, and Palliative and Supportive Care, National Kyushu Cancer Center, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Junko Nozato
- Department of Cancer Center, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Naosuke Yokomichi
- Department of Palliative and Supportive Care, Seirei Mikatahara General Hospital, Hamamatsu, Japan
| | - Kengo Imai
- Seirei Hospice, Seirei Mikatahara General Hospital, Hamamatsu, Japan
| | - Ai Oishi
- Primary Palliative Care Research Group, Usher Institute of Population Health Sciences and Informatics, the University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Yoshiyuki Kizawa
- Department of Palliative Medicine, Kobe University School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan
| | - Eisuke Matsushima
- Section of Liaison Psychiatry and Palliative Medicine, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Ellis-Smith C, Tunnard I, Dawkins M, Gao W, Higginson IJ, Evans CJ. Managing clinical uncertainty in older people towards the end of life: a systematic review of person-centred tools. BMC Palliat Care 2021; 20:168. [PMID: 34674695 PMCID: PMC8532380 DOI: 10.1186/s12904-021-00845-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2021] [Accepted: 08/07/2021] [Indexed: 12/01/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Older people with multi-morbidities commonly experience an uncertain illness trajectory. Clinical uncertainty is challenging to manage, with risk of poor outcomes. Person-centred care is essential to align care and treatment with patient priorities and wishes. Use of evidence-based tools may support person-centred management of clinical uncertainty. We aimed to develop a logic model of person-centred evidence-based tools to manage clinical uncertainty in older people. Methods A systematic mixed-methods review with a results-based convergent synthesis design: a process-based iterative logic model was used, starting with a conceptual framework of clinical uncertainty in older people towards the end of life. This underpinned the methods. Medline, PsycINFO, CINAHL and ASSIA were searched from 2000 to December 2019, using a combination of terms: “uncertainty” AND “palliative care” AND “assessment” OR “care planning”. Studies were included if they developed or evaluated a person-centred tool to manage clinical uncertainty in people aged ≥65 years approaching the end of life and quality appraised using QualSyst. Quantitative and qualitative data were narratively synthesised and thematically analysed respectively and integrated into the logic model. Results Of the 17,095 articles identified, 44 were included, involving 63 tools. There was strong evidence that tools used in clinical care could improve identification of patient priorities and needs (n = 14 studies); that tools support partnership working between patients and practitioners (n = 8) and that tools support integrated care within and across teams and with patients and families (n = 14), improving patient outcomes such as quality of death and dying and satisfaction with care. Communication of clinical uncertainty to patients and families had the least evidence and is challenging to do well. Conclusion The identified logic model moves current knowledge from conceptualising clinical uncertainty to applying evidence-based tools to optimise person-centred management and improve patient outcomes. Key causal pathways are identification of individual priorities and needs, individual care and treatment and integrated care. Communication of clinical uncertainty to patients is challenging and requires training and skill and the use of tools to support practice. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12904-021-00845-9.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Clare Ellis-Smith
- King's College London, Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, Bessemer Road, London, SE5 9PJ, UK.
| | - India Tunnard
- King's College London, Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, Bessemer Road, London, SE5 9PJ, UK
| | - Marsha Dawkins
- King's College London, Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, Bessemer Road, London, SE5 9PJ, UK.,Guys & St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, Westminster Bridge Road, London, SE1 7EH, UK
| | - Wei Gao
- King's College London, Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, Bessemer Road, London, SE5 9PJ, UK
| | - Irene J Higginson
- King's College London, Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, Bessemer Road, London, SE5 9PJ, UK.,King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Catherine J Evans
- King's College London, Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, Bessemer Road, London, SE5 9PJ, UK.,Sussex Community NHS Foundation Trust, Brighton General Hospital, Elm Grove, Brighton, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Spichiger F, Koppitz AL, De Wolf‐Linder S, Murtagh FEM, Volken T, Larkin P. Improving caring quality for people with dementia in nursing homes using IPOS-Dem: A stepped-wedge cluster randomized controlled trial protocol. J Adv Nurs 2021; 77:4234-4245. [PMID: 34235765 PMCID: PMC8518061 DOI: 10.1111/jan.14953] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2021] [Revised: 05/28/2021] [Accepted: 06/15/2021] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
AIMS We aim to evaluate the effectiveness of the Integrated Palliative Care Outcome Scale for people with dementia-based case studies to improve the caring quality for people with dementia in nursing homes by frontline staff and family members. BACKGROUND Swiss nursing homes mostly care for people with dementia. This population is at high risk of receiving little to no palliation for their complex needs. The majority of Swiss frontline healthcare staff do not systematically report on the needs of their residents. Additionally, family members do not routinely participate in assessment processes. DESIGN We will conduct a stepped-wedge cluster randomized trial of repeated assessment using the Integrated Palliative Care Outcome Scale for people with dementia (IPOS-Dem) and subsequent case studies. Clusters will consist of Swiss nursing homes randomly assigned to one of three sequential intervention time points. METHODS The study population will consist of people with dementia living in nursing homes with and without specialized dementia care facilities. Over 16 months, staff working at the frontline and family members will assess the needs and concerns of people with dementia using IPOS-Dem. Depending on sequence allocation, facilitated case studies will start after 3, 6 or 9 months. The primary outcome will be caring quality measured by QUALIDEM. The secondary outcome will be symptoms and concerns, as indicated by the IPOS-Dem sum-score. The Zürich Ethics Committee approved the study in 2019 (2019-01847). IMPACT The results of this study will contribute to improving the effectiveness of person-centred care for people with dementia. Collaboration between healthcare staff and family members will be systematically developed and built upon thorough assessment using the IPOS-Dem and related case studies. The use of IPOS-Dem will offer all frontline staff a systematic approach to have an independent voice within the nursing process, regardless of their qualification or grade.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Frank Spichiger
- HES‐SO ▪ University of AppliedScience and Arts of Western SwitzerlandSchool of Health Sciences FribourgFribourgSwitzerland
- Faculty of Biology and MedicineInstitute of NursingUNILUniversity of LausanneLausanneSwitzerland
| | - Andrea L. Koppitz
- HES‐SO ▪ University of AppliedScience and Arts of Western SwitzerlandSchool of Health Sciences FribourgFribourgSwitzerland
| | - Susanne De Wolf‐Linder
- ZHAWZurich University of Applied ScienceSchool of Health ProfessionsInstitute of NursingWinterthurSwitzerland
- University of HullHull York Medical SchoolWolfson Palliative Care Research CentreHullUK
| | - Fliss E. M. Murtagh
- University of HullHull York Medical SchoolHullUK
- Hull University Teaching Hospitals NHS TrustWolfson Palliative Care Research CentreHullUK
| | - Thomas Volken
- ZHAWZurich University of Applied ScienceSchool of Health ProfessionsInstitute of Health ScienceWinterthurSwitzerland
| | - Philip Larkin
- Faculty of Biology and MedicineInstitute of NursingUNILUniversity of LausanneLausanneSwitzerland
- CHUVLausanne University HospitalLausanneSwitzerland
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Laybourne A, Rapaport P, Livingston G. Long-term implementation of the Managing Agitation and Raising QUality of lifE intervention in care homes: A qualitative study. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 2021; 36:1252-1263. [PMID: 33598945 DOI: 10.1002/gps.5519] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/04/2021] [Accepted: 02/14/2021] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The dementia care home workforce receives little specific training. There are successful interventions, improving care outcomes, but it is unclear whether or how to sustain these effects. The Managing Agitation and Raising Quality of Life (MARQUE) intervention aimed to train care home staff to reduce resident agitation and improve quality of life. It was designed for sustainability, with implementation plans agreed with managers. MARQUE improves quality of life. In this separate study, we aimed to examine implementation around 2 years later. METHODS AND DESIGN We explored practice change since the intervention and considered current implementation of home-specific action plans, enablers or barriers, and perceived benefits or harms of implementation using semi-structured interviews with staff working in the trial homes who received the MARQUE intervention. RESULTS Six out of 10 intervention homes participated. We interviewed 25 staff, 20-30 months after the MARQUE study. In all homes, staff reported that at least one MARQUE component was sustained. Three themes emerged about sustained practice change: (i) communication, (ii) respect and understanding of roles, and (iii) ability to try new things. Notable changes included improved team working and feelings of competence, positive attitude to residents rather than blame for agitation and avoidance, and more pleasant activities. Leadership support was important. CONCLUSIONS It is possible to sustain some change over years in care homes. This study indicates factors which help or impede. These factors individually and together could lead to long-term improved quality of life of residents in homes where it is implemented and sustained.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne Laybourne
- Department of Mental Health of Older People, Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK
| | - Penny Rapaport
- Department of Mental Health of Older People, Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK
| | - Gill Livingston
- Department of Mental Health of Older People, Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Evans CJ, Bone AE, Yi D, Gao W, Morgan M, Taherzadeh S, Maddocks M, Wright J, Lindsay F, Bruni C, Harding R, Sleeman KE, Gomes B, Higginson IJ. Community-based short-term integrated palliative and supportive care reduces symptom distress for older people with chronic noncancer conditions compared with usual care: A randomised controlled single-blind mixed method trial. Int J Nurs Stud 2021; 120:103978. [PMID: 34146843 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2021.103978] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2021] [Revised: 04/18/2021] [Accepted: 05/01/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Globally, a rising number of people live into advanced age and die with multimorbidity and frailty. Palliative care is advocated as a person-centred approach to reduce health-related suffering and promote quality of life. However, no evidence-based interventions exist to deliver community-based palliative care for this population. AIM To evaluate the impact of the short-term integrated palliative and supportive care intervention for older people living with chronic noncancer conditions and frailty on clinical and economic outcomes and perceptions of care. DESIGN Single-blind trial with random block assignment to usual care or the intervention and usual care. The intervention comprised integrated person-centred palliative care delivered by multidisciplinary palliative care teams working with general practitioners and community nurses. Main outcome was change in five key palliative care symptoms from baseline to 12-weeks. Data analysis used intention to treat and complete cases to examine the mean difference in change scores and effect size between the trial arms. Economic evaluation used cost-effectiveness planes and qualitative interviews explored perceptions of the intervention. SETTING/PARTICIPANTS Four National Health Service general practices in England with recruitment of patients aged ≥75 years, with moderate to severe frailty, chronic noncancer condition(s) and ≥2 symptoms or concerns, and family caregivers when available. RESULTS 50 patients were randomly assigned to receive usual care (n = 26, mean age 86.0 years) or the intervention and usual care (n = 24, mean age 85.3 years), and 26 caregivers (control n = 16, mean age 77.0 years; intervention n = 10, mean age 77.3 years). Participants lived at home (n = 48) or care home (n = 2). Complete case analysis (n = 48) on the main outcome showed reduced symptom distress between the intervention compared with usual care (mean difference -1.20, 95% confidence interval -2.37 to -0.027) and medium effect size (omega squared = 0.071). Symptom distress reduced with decreased costs from the intervention compared with usual care, demonstrating cost-effectiveness. Patient (n = 19) and caregiver (n = 9) interviews generated themes about the intervention of 'Little things make a big difference' with optimal management of symptoms and 'Care beyond medicines' of psychosocial support to accommodate decline and maintain independence. CONCLUSIONS This palliative and supportive care intervention is an effective and cost-effective approach to reduce symptom distress for older people severely affected by chronic noncancer conditions. It is a clinically effective way to integrate specialist palliative care with primary and community care for older people with chronic conditions. Further research is indicated to examine its implementation more widely for people at home and in care homes. TRIAL REGISTRATION Controlled-Trials.com ISRCTN 45837097 Tweetable abstract: Specialist palliative care integrated with district nurses and GPs is cost-effective to reduce symptom distress for older people severely affected by chronic conditions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Catherine J Evans
- King's College London, Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabiliation, Bessemer Road, London, SE 9PJ, England; Martlets Hospice, Wayfield Avenue, Hove BN3 7LW, England; Sussex Community National Health Service Foundation Trust, Brighton General Hospital, Elm Grove, Brighton, BN2 3EW, England.
| | - Anna E Bone
- King's College London, Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabiliation, Bessemer Road, London, SE 9PJ, England.
| | - Deokhee Yi
- King's College London, Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabiliation, Bessemer Road, London, SE 9PJ, England.
| | - Wei Gao
- King's College London, Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabiliation, Bessemer Road, London, SE 9PJ, England.
| | - Myfanwy Morgan
- Institute of Pharmaceutical Science, King's College London, Franklin-Wilkins Building, Stamford Street, London SE1 9NH, England.
| | - Shamim Taherzadeh
- Northbourne Medical Centre, 193A Upper Shoreham Road, Shoreham-by-Sea, BN43 6BT, England.
| | - Matthew Maddocks
- King's College London, Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabiliation, Bessemer Road, London, SE 9PJ, England.
| | - Juliet Wright
- University of Sussex, Brighton and Sussex Medical School, Falmer, Brighton, BN1 9RH, England.
| | - Fiona Lindsay
- Martlets Hospice, Wayfield Avenue, Hove BN3 7LW, England; Sussex Community National Health Service Foundation Trust, Brighton General Hospital, Elm Grove, Brighton, BN2 3EW, England.
| | - Carla Bruni
- Sussex Community National Health Service Foundation Trust, Brighton General Hospital, Elm Grove, Brighton, BN2 3EW, England.
| | - Richard Harding
- King's College London, Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabiliation, Bessemer Road, London, SE 9PJ, England.
| | - Katherine E Sleeman
- King's College London, Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabiliation, Bessemer Road, London, SE 9PJ, England.
| | - Barbara Gomes
- King's College London, Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabiliation, Bessemer Road, London, SE 9PJ, England.
| | - Irene J Higginson
- King's College London, Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabiliation, Bessemer Road, London, SE 9PJ, England.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Hodiamont F, Hock H, Ellis-Smith C, Evans C, de Wolf-Linder S, Jünger S, Diehl-Schmid J, Burner-Fritsch I, Bausewein C. Culture in the spotlight-cultural adaptation and content validity of the integrated palliative care outcome scale for dementia: A cognitive interview study. Palliat Med 2021; 35:962-971. [PMID: 33863246 PMCID: PMC8114430 DOI: 10.1177/02692163211004403] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Dementia is a life-limiting disease with high symptom burden. The Integrated Palliative Care Outcome Scale for Dementia (IPOS-Dem) is the first comprehensive person-centered measure to identify and measure palliative care needs of people with dementia. However, such a measure is missing in the German health care system. AIM To develop a culturally adapted German version of the IPOS-Dem and determine its content validity as a foundation for comprehensive psychometric testing. DESIGN Cognitive interview study with intermittent analysis and questionnaire adaptation. Interview guide and coding frame followed thematic analysis according to Willis complemented by Tourangeau's model of cognitive aspects of survey methodology: comprehension, retrieval, judgment, response. PARTICIPANTS Purposive sample with professionals (n = 29) and family carers (n = 6) of people with advanced dementia in seven nursing homes and person's own home care in four interview rounds (n = 11; 10; 7; 7). RESULTS IPOS-Dem was regarded as comprehensive and accessible. Cultural adaption pertained to issues of comprehension and judgment. Comprehension challenges referred to the person-centered concept of "being affected by" used in the POS-measures. Judgment problems related to persons with limited communication causing challenges in assessment. CONCLUSION Most issues of cultural adaptation could be addressed by questionnaire modifications. However, interviews unveiled fundamental challenges for using proxy reported person-centered assessments. Continuous training on how to use the instrument is imperative to integrate the person-centered approach of palliative care into nursing homes as a key provider of generalist palliative care for people with dementia. The refined version is ready for psychometric testing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Farina Hodiamont
- Department of Palliative Medicine, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Helena Hock
- Department of Palliative Medicine, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Clare Ellis-Smith
- Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy & Rehabilitation, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Catherine Evans
- Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy & Rehabilitation, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Susanne de Wolf-Linder
- School of Health Professions, Institute of Nursing, Zurich University of Applied Sciences, Winterthur, Switzerland.,Wolfson Palliative Care Research Centre, Hull York Medical School, University of Hull, Hull, UK
| | - Saskia Jünger
- Department of Community Health, University of Applied Health Sciences, Bochum, Germany
| | - Janine Diehl-Schmid
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Isabel Burner-Fritsch
- Department of Palliative Medicine, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Claudia Bausewein
- Department of Palliative Medicine, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Wareing S, Sethares KA. Personal, social and cultural factors affecting elders' transitions to long term care: Certified nursing assistant perspectives. Appl Nurs Res 2021; 59:151419. [PMID: 33947513 DOI: 10.1016/j.apnr.2021.151419] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2020] [Revised: 03/01/2021] [Accepted: 03/07/2021] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
A focus group methodology was employed to elicit information from Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs) about their views of the personality, social, institutional and cultural factors that affect the success or failure of elders' adaptation to nursing home life. The focus group (N = 6) was conducted in one long-term care facility. CNAs identified three themes that represent the process of successful adaptation to the nursing home. Emotional displacement was followed by a period of assimilation and acceptance. Resident personality, social, institutional and cultural characteristics that may affect each stage of the process are described. This study supports previous findings regarding the contribution of social-environmental elements in the adjustment process. CNA perceptions of factors that assist elders during the transition process proved to be a valuable source of information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susan Wareing
- University of Massachusetts Dartmouth, Tristan Medical LLC, United States of America.
| | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Klapwijk MS, Dekker NL, Caljouw MAA, Achterberg WP, van der Steen JT. Experiences with the Liverpool care pathway for the dying patient in nursing home residents: a mixed-method study to assess physicians' and nurse practitioners' perceptions. BMC Palliat Care 2020; 19:183. [PMID: 33256717 PMCID: PMC7706263 DOI: 10.1186/s12904-020-00686-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2020] [Accepted: 11/18/2020] [Indexed: 08/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Background The Liverpool care pathway for the dying patient (LCP) is a multidisciplinary tool developed for the dying phase for use in palliative care settings. The literature reports divergent experiences with its application in a nursing home setting related to its implementation and staff competencies. The aim of this study is to understand how the LCP is being used in the context of the nursing home, including for residents with dementia, and experienced from the perspectives of those responsible for medical treatment in nursing homes. Methods A mixed-methods approach was used, consisting of a survey followed by interviews. A link to a 9-item online survey with closed and open-ended questions was emailed to all physicians and nurse practitioners of 33 care organisations with nursing homes in three regions of the Netherlands (North, West and South). In addition, 10 respondents with particularly positive or negative experiences were selected for semi-structured interviews. Results The survey was completed by 159 physicians and nurse practitioners. The respondents were very positive on the content and less positive on the use of the LCP, although they reported difficulties identifying the right time to start the LCP, especially in case of dementia. Also using the LCP was more complicated after the implementation of the electronic health record. The LCP was judged to be a marker of quality for the assessment of symptoms in the dying phase and communication with relatives. Conclusion An instrument that prompts regular assessment of a dying person was perceived by those responsible for (medical) care to contribute to good care. As such, the LCP was valued, but there was a clear need to start it earlier than in the last days or hours of life, a need for a shorter version, and for integration of the LCP in the electronic health record. Regular assessments with an instrument that focusses on quality of care and good symptom control can improve palliative care for nursing home residents with and without dementia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maartje S Klapwijk
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Center, P.O. Box 9600, Leiden, 2300 RC, the Netherlands. .,Marente, Leiden, the Netherlands.
| | - Natashe Lemos Dekker
- Institute of Cultural Anthropology and Development Sociology, Leiden University, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Monique A A Caljouw
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Center, P.O. Box 9600, Leiden, 2300 RC, the Netherlands
| | - Wilco P Achterberg
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Center, P.O. Box 9600, Leiden, 2300 RC, the Netherlands
| | - Jenny T van der Steen
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Center, P.O. Box 9600, Leiden, 2300 RC, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Sampson EL, Anderson JE, Candy B, Davies N, Ellis-Smith C, Gola A, Harding R, Kenten C, Kupeli N, Mead S, Moore KJ, Omar RZ, Sleeman KE, Stewart R, Ward J, Warren JD, Evans CJ. Empowering Better End-of-Life Dementia Care (EMBED-Care): A mixed methods protocol to achieve integrated person-centred care across settings. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 2020; 35:820-832. [PMID: 31854477 DOI: 10.1002/gps.5251] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/02/2019] [Accepted: 12/07/2019] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Globally, the number of people with dementia who have palliative care needs will increase fourfold over the next 40 years. The Empowering Better End-of-Life Dementia Care (EMBED-Care) Programme aims to deliver a step change in care through a large sequential study, spanning multiple work streams. METHODS We will use mixed methods across settings where people with dementia live and die: their own homes, care homes, and hospitals. Beginning with policy syntheses and reviews of interventions, we will develop a conceptual framework and underpinning theory of change. We will use linked data sets to explore current service use, care transitions, and inequalities and predict future need for end-of-life dementia care. Longitudinal cohort studies of people with dementia (including young onset and prion dementias) and their carers will describe care transitions, quality of life, symptoms, formal and informal care provision, and costs. Data will be synthesised, underpinned by the Knowledge-to-Action Implementation Framework, to design a novel complex intervention to support assessment, decision making, and communication between patients, carers, and inter-professional teams. This will be feasibility and pilot tested in UK settings. Patient and public involvement and engagement, innovative work with artists, policymakers, and third sector organisations are embedded to drive impact. We will build research capacity and develop an international network for excellence in dementia palliative care. CONCLUSIONS EMBED-Care will help us understand current and future need, develop novel cost-effective care innovations, build research capacity, and promote international collaborations in research and practice to ensure people live and die well with dementia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabeth L Sampson
- Marie Curie Palliative Care Research Department, Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK.,Barnet Enfield and Haringey Mental Health Trust Liaison Psychiatry Team, North Middlesex University Hospital, London, UK
| | - Janet E Anderson
- Department of Adult Nursing, Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery and Palliative Care, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Bridget Candy
- Marie Curie Palliative Care Research Department, Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK
| | - Nathan Davies
- Marie Curie Palliative Care Research Department, Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK.,Centre for Population Ageing Studies, Research Department of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Clare Ellis-Smith
- Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy & Rehabilitation, Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery and Palliative Care, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Anna Gola
- Marie Curie Palliative Care Research Department, Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK
| | - Richard Harding
- Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy & Rehabilitation, Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery and Palliative Care, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Charlotte Kenten
- Marie Curie Palliative Care Research Department, Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK
| | - Nuriye Kupeli
- Marie Curie Palliative Care Research Department, Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK
| | - Simon Mead
- National Prion Clinic, National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.,MRC Prion Unit at UCL, Institute of Prion Diseases, UCL, London, UK
| | - Kirsten J Moore
- Marie Curie Palliative Care Research Department, Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK
| | - Rumana Z Omar
- Department of Statistical Science, University College London, London, UK
| | - Katherine E Sleeman
- Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy & Rehabilitation, Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery and Palliative Care, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Robert Stewart
- Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.,South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Jane Ward
- Marie Curie Palliative Care Research Department, Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK
| | - Jason D Warren
- Dementia Research Centre, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, UK
| | - Catherine J Evans
- Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy & Rehabilitation, Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery and Palliative Care, King's College London, London, UK.,Sussex Community NHS Foundation Trust, Brighton, UK
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Evans CJ, Yorganci E, Lewis P, Koffman J, Stone K, Tunnard I, Wee B, Bernal W, Hotopf M, Higginson IJ. Processes of consent in research for adults with impaired mental capacity nearing the end of life: systematic review and transparent expert consultation (MORECare_Capacity statement). BMC Med 2020; 18:221. [PMID: 32693800 PMCID: PMC7374835 DOI: 10.1186/s12916-020-01654-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2019] [Accepted: 06/03/2020] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Involving adults lacking capacity (ALC) in research on end of life care (EoLC) or serious illness is important, but often omitted. We aimed to develop evidence-based guidance on how best to include individuals with impaired capacity nearing the end of life in research, by identifying the challenges and solutions for processes of consent across the capacity spectrum. METHODS Methods Of Researching End of Life Care_Capacity (MORECare_C) furthers the MORECare statement on research evaluating EoLC. We used simultaneous methods of systematic review and transparent expert consultation (TEC). The systematic review involved four electronic databases searches. The eligibility criteria identified studies involving adults with serious illness and impaired capacity, and methods for recruitment in research, implementing the research methods, and exploring public attitudes. The TEC involved stakeholder consultation to discuss and generate recommendations, and a Delphi survey and an expert 'think-tank' to explore consensus. We narratively synthesised the literature mapping processes of consent with recruitment outcomes, solutions, and challenges. We explored recommendation consensus using descriptive statistics. Synthesis of all the findings informed the guidance statement. RESULTS Of the 5539 articles identified, 91 met eligibility. The studies encompassed people with dementia (27%) and in palliative care (18%). Seventy-five percent used observational designs. Studies on research methods (37 studies) focused on processes of proxy decision-making, advance consent, and deferred consent. Studies implementing research methods (30 studies) demonstrated the role of family members as both proxy decision-makers and supporting decision-making for the person with impaired capacity. The TEC involved 43 participants who generated 29 recommendations, with consensus that indicated. Key areas were the timeliness of the consent process and maximising an individual's decisional capacity. The think-tank (n = 19) refined equivocal recommendations including supporting proxy decision-makers, training practitioners, and incorporating legislative frameworks. CONCLUSIONS The MORECare_C statement details 20 solutions to recruit ALC nearing the EoL in research. The statement provides much needed guidance to enrol individuals with serious illness in research. Key is involving family members early and designing study procedures to accommodate variable and changeable levels of capacity. The statement demonstrates the ethical imperative and processes of recruiting adults across the capacity spectrum in varying populations and settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C J Evans
- Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy & Rehabilitation, Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery & Palliative Care, King's College London, Bessemer Road, London, SE5 9PJ, UK.
- Sussex Community NHS Foundation Trust, Brighton General Hospital, Brighton, UK.
| | - E Yorganci
- Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy & Rehabilitation, Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery & Palliative Care, King's College London, Bessemer Road, London, SE5 9PJ, UK
| | - P Lewis
- Centre of Medical Law and Ethics, The Dickson Poon School of Law, King's College London, London, UK
| | - J Koffman
- Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy & Rehabilitation, Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery & Palliative Care, King's College London, Bessemer Road, London, SE5 9PJ, UK
| | - K Stone
- Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy & Rehabilitation, Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery & Palliative Care, King's College London, Bessemer Road, London, SE5 9PJ, UK
| | - I Tunnard
- Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy & Rehabilitation, Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery & Palliative Care, King's College London, Bessemer Road, London, SE5 9PJ, UK
| | - B Wee
- Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust and Harris Manchester College, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - W Bernal
- King's College Hospital, London, UK
| | - M Hotopf
- Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| | - I J Higginson
- Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy & Rehabilitation, Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery & Palliative Care, King's College London, Bessemer Road, London, SE5 9PJ, UK
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Froggatt K, Best A, Bunn F, Burnside G, Coast J, Dunleavy L, Goodman C, Hardwick B, Jackson C, Kinley J, Davidson Lund A, Lynch J, Mitchell P, Myring G, Patel S, Algorta GP, Preston N, Scott D, Silvera K, Walshe C. A group intervention to improve quality of life for people with advanced dementia living in care homes: the Namaste feasibility cluster RCT. Health Technol Assess 2020; 24:1-140. [PMID: 31971506 PMCID: PMC7008353 DOI: 10.3310/hta24060] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/26/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND People with advanced dementia who live and die in nursing homes experience variable quality of life, care and dying. There is a need to identify appropriate, cost-effective interventions that facilitate high-quality end-of-life care provision. OBJECTIVES To establish the feasibility and acceptability to staff and family of conducting a cluster randomised controlled trial of the Namaste Care intervention for people with advanced dementia in nursing homes. DESIGN The study had three phases: (1) realist review and (2) intervention refinement to inform the design of (3) a feasibility cluster randomised controlled trial with a process evaluation and economic analysis. Clusters (nursing homes) were randomised in a 3 : 1 ratio to intervention or control (usual care). The nature of the intervention meant that blinding was not possible. SETTING Nursing homes in England providing care for people with dementia. PARTICIPANTS Residents with advanced dementia (assessed as having a Functional Assessment Staging Test score of 6 or 7), their informal carers and nursing home staff. INTERVENTION Namaste Care is a complex group intervention that provides structured personalised care in a dedicated space, focusing on enhancements to the physical environment, comfort management and sensory engagement. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The two contender primary outcome measures were Comfort Assessment in Dying - End of Life Care in Dementia for quality of dying (dementia) and Quality of Life in Late Stage Dementia for quality of life. The secondary outcomes were as follows: person with dementia, sleep/activity (actigraphy), neuropsychiatric symptoms, agitation and pain; informal carers, satisfaction with care at the end of life; staff members, person-centred care assessment, satisfaction with care at the end of life and readiness for change; and other data - health economic outcomes, medication/service use and intervention activity. RESULTS Phase 1 (realist review; 86 papers) identified that a key intervention component was the activities enabling the development of moments of connection. In phase 2, refinement of the intervention enabled the production of a user-friendly 16-page A4 booklet. In phase 3, eight nursing homes were recruited. Two homes withdrew before the intervention commenced; four intervention and two control homes completed the study. Residents with advanced dementia (n = 32) were recruited in intervention (n = 18) and control (n = 14) homes. Informal carers (total, n = 12: intervention, n = 5; control, n = 7) and 97 staff from eight sites (intervention, n = 75; control, n = 22) were recruited over a 6-month period. Recruitment is feasible. Completion rates of the primary outcome questionnaires were high at baseline (100%) and at 4 weeks (96.8%). The Quality of Life in Late Stage Dementia was more responsive to change over 24 weeks. Even where economic data were missing, these could be collected in a full trial. The intervention was acceptable; the dose varied depending on the staffing and physical environment of each care home. Staff and informal carers reported changes for the person with dementia in two ways: increased social engagement and greater calm. No adverse events related to the intervention were reported. CONCLUSIONS A subsequent definitive trial is feasible if there are amendments to the recruitment process, outcome measure choice and intervention specification. FUTURE WORK In a full trial, consideration is needed of the appropriate outcome measure that is sensitive to different participant responses, and of clear implementation principles for this person-centred intervention in a nursing home context. TRIAL REGISTRATION Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN14948133. FUNDING This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 24, No. 6. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katherine Froggatt
- International Observatory on End of Life Care, Faculty of Health and Medicine, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK
| | - Ashley Best
- Clinical Trials Research Centre, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Frances Bunn
- Department of Health and Human Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, UK
| | - Girvan Burnside
- Clinical Trials Research Centre, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Joanna Coast
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Lesley Dunleavy
- International Observatory on End of Life Care, Faculty of Health and Medicine, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK
| | - Claire Goodman
- Department of Health and Human Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, UK
| | - Ben Hardwick
- Clinical Trials Research Centre, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Clare Jackson
- Clinical Trials Research Centre, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | | | | | - Jennifer Lynch
- Department of Health and Human Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, UK
| | - Paul Mitchell
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Gareth Myring
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Shakil Patel
- Lancashire Clinical Trials Unit, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, UK
| | - Guillermo Perez Algorta
- International Observatory on End of Life Care, Faculty of Health and Medicine, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK
| | - Nancy Preston
- International Observatory on End of Life Care, Faculty of Health and Medicine, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK
| | | | - Kate Silvera
- Clinical Trials Research Centre, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Catherine Walshe
- International Observatory on End of Life Care, Faculty of Health and Medicine, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Finucane AM, Bone AE, Evans CJ, Gomes B, Meade R, Higginson IJ, Murray SA. The impact of population ageing on end-of-life care in Scotland: projections of place of death and recommendations for future service provision. BMC Palliat Care 2019; 18:112. [PMID: 31829177 PMCID: PMC6907353 DOI: 10.1186/s12904-019-0490-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2019] [Accepted: 11/15/2019] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Global annual deaths are rising. It is essential to examine where future deaths may occur to facilitate decisions regarding future service provision and resource allocation. AIMS To project where people will die from 2017 to 2040 in an ageing country with advanced integrated palliative care, and to prioritise recommendations based on these trends. METHODS Population-based trend analysis of place of death for people that died in Scotland (2004-2016) and projections using simple linear modelling (2017-2040); Transparent Expert Consultation to prioritise recommendations in response to projections. RESULTS Deaths are projected to increase by 15.9% from 56,728 in 2016 (32.8% aged 85+ years) to 65,757 deaths in 2040 (45% aged 85+ years). Between 2004 and 2016, proportions of home and care home deaths increased (19.8-23.4% and 14.5-18.8%), while the proportion of hospital deaths declined (58.0-50.1%). If current trends continue, the numbers of deaths at home and in care homes will increase, and two-thirds will die outside hospital by 2040. To sustain current trends, priorities include: 1) to increase and upskill a community health and social care workforce through education, training and valuing of care work; 2) to build community care capacity through informal carer support and community engagement; 3) to stimulate a realistic public debate on death, dying and sustainable funding. CONCLUSION To sustain current trends, health and social care provision in the community needs to grow to support nearly 60% more people at the end-of-life by 2040; otherwise hospital deaths will increase.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne M. Finucane
- Marie Curie Hospice Edinburgh, 45 Frogston Road West, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK
- Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK
| | - Anna E. Bone
- Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, King’s College London, Bessemer Road, Denmark Hill, London, SE5 9PJ UK
| | - Catherine J. Evans
- Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, King’s College London, Bessemer Road, Denmark Hill, London, SE5 9PJ UK
| | - Barbara Gomes
- Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, King’s College London, Bessemer Road, Denmark Hill, London, SE5 9PJ UK
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
| | - Richard Meade
- Policy and Public Affairs for Scotland, Marie Curie, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK
| | - Irene J. Higginson
- Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, King’s College London, Bessemer Road, Denmark Hill, London, SE5 9PJ UK
| | - Scott A. Murray
- Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Kinley J, Ellis-Smith C, Hurt M, McIvor K, Evans CJ. A collaborative approach in dementia care to improve clinical effectiveness and priorities for research through audit. Int J Palliat Nurs 2019; 25:588-595. [PMID: 31855518 DOI: 10.12968/ijpn.2019.25.12.588] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND To provide appropriate cost-effective care for an ageing population, realignment of care provision to conditions common in advanced age, notably, dementia and multi-morbidities is required. The use of outcome measures in practice may enable this. AIM A collaborative baseline audit was undertaken to understand how best to implement outcome measures into services for people with dementia across clinical settings. METHODS An academic institution set up a 6-month collaborative baseline audit in 11 English sites. Measures comprised: symptoms/concerns (Integrated Palliative care Outcome Scale for Dementia); Phase of Illness; functional status (Australia-modified Karnofsky Performance Scale); and dementia severity (Functional Assessment Staging). FINDINGS Measures were completed at first assessment for 225 people with dementia across nine sites. Their completion promoted comprehensive assessments, but challenges also existed, including recording the prevalence/severity of non-physical symptoms by proxy. CONCLUSIONS The joining together of clinical academic expertise enabled mobilisation of expert knowledge into and from clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julie Kinley
- Formerly Nurse Consultant for Care Homes, Care Home Project Team, London
| | - Clare Ellis-Smith
- Lecturer in Palliative Care, Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, King's College London
| | - Michael Hurt
- Formerly Head of Older People and Dementia, NHS Walsall Clinical Commissioning Group, Walsall
| | - Karen McIvor
- Dementia Nurse Specialist, Royal Trinity Hospice, London
| | - Catherine J Evans
- Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, King's College London and HEE/NIHR Senior Clinical Lecturer and Honorary Nurse Consultant in Palliative Care, Sussex Community NHS Foundation Trust, Brighton
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Sakurai H, Miyashita M, Imai K, Miyamoto S, Otani H, Oishi A, Kizawa Y, Matsushima E. Validation of the Integrated Palliative care Outcome Scale (IPOS) - Japanese Version. Jpn J Clin Oncol 2019; 49:257-262. [PMID: 30668720 DOI: 10.1093/jjco/hyy203] [Citation(s) in RCA: 62] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2018] [Revised: 11/19/2018] [Accepted: 12/20/2018] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND To improve palliative care practice, the need for patients-reported outcome measures is increasing globally. The Integrated Palliative care Outcome Scale (IPOS) is a streamlined outcome scale developed to comprehensively evaluate patients' distress. The goal of this study is to assess the reliability and validity of IPOS-Japanese version in cancer patients. METHODS This is a multicenter, cross-sectional observational study. We assessed the missing values, prevalence, test-retest reliability, criterion validity and known-group validity in Japanese adult cancer patients. Patients provided responses to IPOS, European Organization for Research and Treatment for Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30), and Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy- Spiritual 12 (FACIT-Sp12). Our medical staff provided responses to Support Team Assessment Schedule (STAS). RESULTS One hundred forty-two patients were enrolled at six palliative care facilities. Missing values accounted for less than 1% of most items, with a maximum of 2.8%. The prevalence of symptoms was 17.7-88.7%. The intra-class correlation coefficient ranged from 0.522 to 0.951. The range of correlation coefficients with EORTC-QLQ-C30, FACIT-Sp12 and STAS as gold standards was 0.013 to 0.864 (absolute values). Total IPOS scores were positively correlated with Eastern Corporative Oncology Group Performance Status (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION IPOS-Japanese version is a valid and reliable tool. The scale is useful in assessing physical, psychological, social and spiritual symptoms and in measuring outcomes of adult cancer patients in Japan.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hiroki Sakurai
- Section of Liaison Psychiatry and Palliative Medicine, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Tokyo Medical and Dental University.,Department of Palliative Care, Cancer Institute Hospital of Japan Foundation for Cancer Research (JFCR), Tokyo
| | - Mitsunori Miyashita
- Department of Palliative Nursing and Health Sciences, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai
| | - Kengo Imai
- Seirei Hospice, Seirei Mikatahara General Hospital, Hamamatsu
| | - Shingo Miyamoto
- Department of Medical Oncology, Japanese Red Cross Medical Center, Tokyo
| | - Hiroyuki Otani
- Department of Palliative Care Team, and Palliative and Supportive Care, National Kyushu Cancer Center, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Ai Oishi
- Primary Palliative Care Research Group, Usher Institute of Population Health Sciences and Informatics, the University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - Yoshiyuki Kizawa
- Department of Palliative Medicine, Kobe University School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan
| | - Eisuke Matsushima
- Section of Liaison Psychiatry and Palliative Medicine, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Tokyo Medical and Dental University
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
EVANS CATHERINEJ, ISON LUCY, ELLIS‐SMITH CLARE, NICHOLSON CAROLINE, COSTA ALESSIA, OLUYASE ADEJOKEO, NAMISANGO EVE, BONE ANNAE, BRIGHTON LISAJANE, YI DEOKHEE, COMBES SARAH, BAJWAH SABRINA, GAO WEI, HARDING RICHARD, ONG PAUL, HIGGINSON IRENEJ, MADDOCKS MATTHEW. Service Delivery Models to Maximize Quality of Life for Older People at the End of Life: A Rapid Review. Milbank Q 2019; 97:113-175. [PMID: 30883956 PMCID: PMC6422603 DOI: 10.1111/1468-0009.12373] [Citation(s) in RCA: 48] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Policy Points We identified two overarching classifications of integrated geriatric and palliative care to maximize older people's quality of life at the end of life. Both are oriented to person-centered care, but with differing emphasis on either function or symptoms and concerns. Policymakers should both improve access to palliative care beyond just the last months of life and increase geriatric care provision to maintain and optimize function. This would ensure that continuity and coordination for potentially complex care needs across the continuum of late life would be maintained, where the demarcation of boundaries between healthy aging and healthy dying become increasingly blurred. Our findings highlight the urgent need for health system change to improve end-of-life care as part of universal health coverage. The use of health services should be informed by the likelihood of benefits and intended outcomes rather than on prognosis. CONTEXT In an era of unprecedented global aging, a key priority is to align health and social services for older populations in order to support the dual priorities of living well while adapting to a gradual decline in function. We aimed to provide a comprehensive synthesis of evidence regarding service delivery models that optimize the quality of life (QoL) for older people at the end of life across health, social, and welfare services worldwide. METHODS We conducted a rapid scoping review of systematic reviews. We searched MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, and CDSR databases from 2000 to 2017 for reviews reporting the effectiveness of service models aimed at optimizing QoL for older people, more than 50% of whom were older than 60 and in the last one or two years of life. We assessed the quality of these included reviews using AMSTAR and synthesized the findings narratively. RESULTS Of the 2,238 reviews identified, we included 72, with 20 reporting meta-analysis. Although all the World Health Organization (WHO) regions were represented, most of the reviews reported data from the Americas (52 of 72), Europe (46 of 72), and/or the Western Pacific (28 of 72). We identified two overarching classifications of service models but with different target outcomes: Integrated Geriatric Care, emphasizing physical function, and Integrated Palliative Care, focusing mainly on symptoms and concerns. Areas of synergy across the overarching classifications included person-centered care, education, and a multiprofessional workforce. The reviews assessed 117 separate outcomes. A meta-analysis demonstrated effectiveness for both classifications on QoL, including symptoms such as pain, depression, and psychological well-being. Economic analysis and its implications were poorly considered. CONCLUSIONS Despite their different target outcomes, those service models classified as Integrated Geriatric Care or Integrated Palliative Care were effective in improving QoL for older people nearing the end of life. Both approaches highlight the imperative for integrating services across the care continuum, with service involvement triggered by the patient's needs and likelihood of benefits. To inform the sustainability of health system change we encourage economic analyses that span health and social care and examine all sources of finance to understand contextual inequalities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- CATHERINE J. EVANS
- King's College London, Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative CarePolicy and Rehabilitation
- Sussex Community NHS Foundation TrustBrighton General Hospital
| | - LUCY ISON
- King's College London, Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative CarePolicy and Rehabilitation
| | - CLARE ELLIS‐SMITH
- King's College London, Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative CarePolicy and Rehabilitation
| | - CAROLINE NICHOLSON
- King's College London, Florence Nightingale Faculty of NursingMidwifery & Palliative Care
- St Christopher's Hospice
| | - ALESSIA COSTA
- King's College London, Florence Nightingale Faculty of NursingMidwifery & Palliative Care
| | - ADEJOKE O. OLUYASE
- King's College London, Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative CarePolicy and Rehabilitation
| | - EVE NAMISANGO
- King's College London, Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative CarePolicy and Rehabilitation
| | - ANNA E. BONE
- King's College London, Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative CarePolicy and Rehabilitation
| | - LISA JANE BRIGHTON
- King's College London, Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative CarePolicy and Rehabilitation
| | - DEOKHEE YI
- King's College London, Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative CarePolicy and Rehabilitation
| | - SARAH COMBES
- King's College London, Florence Nightingale Faculty of NursingMidwifery & Palliative Care
| | - SABRINA BAJWAH
- King's College London, Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative CarePolicy and Rehabilitation
| | - WEI GAO
- King's College London, Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative CarePolicy and Rehabilitation
| | - RICHARD HARDING
- King's College London, Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative CarePolicy and Rehabilitation
| | - PAUL ONG
- World Health Organisation Centre for Health Development
| | - IRENE J. HIGGINSON
- King's College London, Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative CarePolicy and Rehabilitation
| | - MATTHEW MADDOCKS
- King's College London, Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative CarePolicy and Rehabilitation
| |
Collapse
|