1
|
Zugni F, Mariani L, Lambregts DMJ, Maggioni R, Summers PE, Granata V, Pecchi A, Di Costanzo G, De Muzio F, Cardobi N, Giovagnoni A, Petralia G. Whole-body MRI in oncology: acquisition protocols, current guidelines, and beyond. LA RADIOLOGIA MEDICA 2024:10.1007/s11547-024-01851-6. [PMID: 38990426 DOI: 10.1007/s11547-024-01851-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2024] [Accepted: 07/04/2024] [Indexed: 07/12/2024]
Abstract
Acknowledging the increasing use of whole-body magnetic resonance imaging (WB-MRI) in the oncological setting, we conducted a narrative review focusing on practical aspects of the examination and providing a synthesis of various acquisition protocols described in the literature. Firstly, we addressed the topic of patient preparation, emphasizing methods to enhance examination acceptance. This included strategies for reducing anxiety and patient distress, improving staff-patient interactions, and increasing overall patient comfort. Secondly, we analysed WB-MRI acquisition protocols recommended in existing imaging guidelines, such as MET-RADS-P, MY-RADS, and ONCO-RADS, and provided an overview of acquisition protocols reported in the literature regarding other expanding applications of WB-MRI in oncology, in patients with breast cancer, ovarian cancer, melanoma, colorectal and lung cancer, lymphoma, and cancers of unknown primary. Finally, we suggested possible acquisition parameters for whole-body images across MR systems from three different vendors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fabio Zugni
- Division of Radiology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
| | - Leonardo Mariani
- Postgraduation School in Radiodiagnostics, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Doenja M J Lambregts
- Department of Radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Roberta Maggioni
- Division of Radiology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Paul E Summers
- Division of Radiology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Vincenza Granata
- Division of Radiology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori Di Napoli, IRCCS "G. Pascale", Naples, Italy
| | - Annarita Pecchi
- Department of Radiology, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | | | - Federica De Muzio
- Department of Radiology, Pineta Grande Hospital, Via Domitiana Km 30, Castel Volturno, Italy
| | - Nicolò Cardobi
- Radiology Unit, Department of Pathology and Diagnostics, University Hospital of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Andrea Giovagnoni
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital "Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Delle Marche", Ancona, Italy
- Department of Clinical, Special and Dental Sciences, Università Politecnica Delle Marche, Ancona, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Petralia
- Division of Radiology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Guimarães JB, da Cruz IAN, Ahlawat S, Ormond Filho AG, Nico MAC, Lederman HM, Fayad LM. The Role of Whole-Body MRI in Pediatric Musculoskeletal Oncology: Current Concepts and Clinical Applications. J Magn Reson Imaging 2024; 59:1886-1901. [PMID: 34145692 DOI: 10.1002/jmri.27787] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/03/2021] [Revised: 06/04/2021] [Accepted: 06/04/2021] [Indexed: 01/23/2023] Open
Abstract
Whole-body magnetic resonance imaging (WB-MRI) has gained importance in the field of musculoskeletal oncology over the last decades, consisting in a one-stop imaging method that allows a wide coverage assessment of both bone and soft tissue involvement. WB-MRI is valuable for diagnosis, staging, and follow-up in many oncologic diseases and is especially advantageous for the pediatric population since it avoids redundant examinations and exposure to ionizing radiation in patients who often undergo long-term surveillance. Its clinical application has been studied in many pediatric neoplasms, such as cancer predisposition syndromes, Langerhans cell histiocytosis, lymphoma, sarcomas, and neuroblastoma. The addition of diffusion-weighted sequences allows functional evaluation of neoplastic lesions, which is helpful in the assessment of viable tumor and response to treatment after neoadjuvant or adjuvant therapy. WB-MRI is an excellent alternative to fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography/computed tomography in oncologic children, with comparable accuracy and the convenience of being radiation-free, fast to perform, and available at a similar cost. The development of new techniques and protocols makes WB-MRI increasingly faster, safer, and more accessible, and it is important for referring physicians and radiologists to recognize the role of this imaging method in pediatric oncology. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4 TECHNICAL EFFICACY STAGE: 2.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Júlio Brandão Guimarães
- Diagnostic Imaging Center, Pediatric Oncology Institute, Grupo de Apoio ao Adolescente e à Criança com Câncer (GRAACC), São Paulo, Brazil
- Department of Radiology, Fleury Group, São Paulo, Brazil
- Department of Radiology, Federal University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | | | - Shivani Ahlawat
- The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Alípio Gomes Ormond Filho
- Diagnostic Imaging Center, Pediatric Oncology Institute, Grupo de Apoio ao Adolescente e à Criança com Câncer (GRAACC), São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Marcelo Astolfi Caetano Nico
- Diagnostic Imaging Center, Pediatric Oncology Institute, Grupo de Apoio ao Adolescente e à Criança com Câncer (GRAACC), São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Henrique Manoel Lederman
- Diagnostic Imaging Center, Pediatric Oncology Institute, Grupo de Apoio ao Adolescente e à Criança com Câncer (GRAACC), São Paulo, Brazil
- Department of Radiology, Federal University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Laura Marie Fayad
- The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Zels G, Van Baelen K, De Schepper M, Borremans K, Geukens T, Isnaldi E, Izci H, Leduc S, Mahdami A, Maetens M, Nguyen HL, Pabba A, Richard F, Van Cauwenberge J, Smeets A, Nevelsteen I, Neven P, Wildiers H, Van Den Bogaert W, Floris G, Desmedt C. Metastases of primary mixed no-special type and lobular breast cancer display an exclusive lobular histology. Breast 2024; 75:103732. [PMID: 38653060 PMCID: PMC11053301 DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2024.103732] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2023] [Revised: 03/08/2024] [Accepted: 04/07/2024] [Indexed: 04/25/2024] Open
Abstract
Primary tumors with a mixed invasive breast carcinoma of no-special type (IBC-NST) and invasive lobular cancer (ILC) histology are present in approximately five percent of all patients with breast cancer and are understudied at the metastatic level. Here, we characterized the histology of metastases from two patients with primary mixed IBC-NST/ILC from the postmortem tissue donation program UPTIDER (NCT04531696). The 14 and 43 metastatic lesions collected at autopsy had morphological features and E-cadherin staining patterns consistent with pure ILC. While our findings still require further validation, they may challenge current clinical practice and imaging modalities used in these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gitte Zels
- Laboratory for Translational Breast Cancer Research, Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Belgium; Department of Pathology, UZ Leuven, Belgium
| | - Karen Van Baelen
- Laboratory for Translational Breast Cancer Research, Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Belgium; Gynecological Oncology Unit, Department of Gynecology, University Hospitals Leuven, Belgium
| | - Maxim De Schepper
- Laboratory for Translational Breast Cancer Research, Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Belgium; Department of Pathology, UZ Leuven, Belgium
| | - Kristien Borremans
- Laboratory for Translational Breast Cancer Research, Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Belgium; Gynecological Oncology Unit, Department of Gynecology, University Hospitals Leuven, Belgium
| | - Tatjana Geukens
- Laboratory for Translational Breast Cancer Research, Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Belgium; General Medical Oncology Unit, Department of Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Belgium
| | - Edoardo Isnaldi
- Laboratory for Translational Breast Cancer Research, Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Belgium
| | - Hava Izci
- Laboratory for Translational Breast Cancer Research, Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Belgium
| | - Sophia Leduc
- Laboratory for Translational Breast Cancer Research, Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Belgium
| | - Amena Mahdami
- Laboratory for Translational Breast Cancer Research, Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Belgium
| | - Marion Maetens
- Laboratory for Translational Breast Cancer Research, Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Belgium
| | - Ha Linh Nguyen
- Laboratory for Translational Breast Cancer Research, Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Belgium
| | - Anirudh Pabba
- Laboratory for Translational Breast Cancer Research, Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Belgium
| | - François Richard
- Laboratory for Translational Breast Cancer Research, Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Belgium
| | - Josephine Van Cauwenberge
- Laboratory for Translational Breast Cancer Research, Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Belgium; Gynecological Oncology Unit, Department of Gynecology, University Hospitals Leuven, Belgium
| | - Ann Smeets
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Ines Nevelsteen
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Patrick Neven
- Gynecological Oncology Unit, Department of Gynecology, University Hospitals Leuven, Belgium
| | - Hans Wildiers
- General Medical Oncology Unit, Department of Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Belgium
| | | | - Giuseppe Floris
- Department of Pathology, UZ Leuven, Belgium; Laboratory for Translational Cell & Tissue Research, Department of Imaging & Pathology, KU Leuven, Belgium
| | - Christine Desmedt
- Laboratory for Translational Breast Cancer Research, Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Belgium.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Van Baelen K, Van Cauwenberge J, Maetens M, Beck G, Camden A, Chase MC, Fraser V, Freeney S, Hutcheson L, Levine JK, Lien T, Terveer R, Turner C, Senkus E, Jankowitz RC, Vandecaveye V, Floris G, Neven P, Wildiers H, Sawyer E, Vincent-Salomon A, Derksen PWB, Desmedt C. Reporting on invasive lobular breast cancer in clinical trials: a systematic review. NPJ Breast Cancer 2024; 10:23. [PMID: 38509112 PMCID: PMC10954721 DOI: 10.1038/s41523-024-00627-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2023] [Accepted: 02/27/2024] [Indexed: 03/22/2024] Open
Abstract
Invasive lobular breast cancer (ILC) differs from invasive breast cancer of no special type in many ways. Evidence on treatment efficacy for ILC is, however, lacking. We studied the degree of documentation and representation of ILC in phase III/IV clinical trials for novel breast cancer treatments. Trials were identified on Pubmed and clinicaltrials.gov. Inclusion/exclusion criteria were reviewed for requirements on histological subtype and tumor measurability. Documentation of ILC was assessed and ILC inclusion rate, central pathology and subgroup analyses were evaluated. Inclusion restrictions concerning tumor measurability were found in 39/93 manuscripts. Inclusion rates for ILC were documented in 13/93 manuscripts and varied between 2.0 and 26.0%. No central pathology for ILC was reported and 3/13 manuscripts had ILC sub-analyses. ILC is largely disregarded in most trials with poor representation and documentation. The current inclusion criteria using RECIST v1.1, fall short in recognizing the unique non-measurable metastatic infiltration of ILC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karen Van Baelen
- Laboratory for Translational Breast Cancer Research, Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Gynecological Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Josephine Van Cauwenberge
- Laboratory for Translational Breast Cancer Research, Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Gynecological Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Marion Maetens
- Laboratory for Translational Breast Cancer Research, Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Gabriela Beck
- European Lobular Breast Cancer Consortium, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Ann Camden
- Lobular Breast Cancer Alliance inc., Plymouth, MA, USA
| | | | | | - Siobhan Freeney
- European Lobular Breast Cancer Consortium, Utrecht, the Netherlands
- Lobular Ireland, Dublin, Ireland
| | | | | | - Tone Lien
- European Lobular Breast Cancer Consortium, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Rian Terveer
- European Lobular Breast Cancer Consortium, Utrecht, the Netherlands
- Borstkankervereniging Nederland, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Claire Turner
- European Lobular Breast Cancer Consortium, Utrecht, the Netherlands
- Lobular Breast Cancer UK, Manchester, UK
| | - Elzbieta Senkus
- Department of Oncology and Radiotherapy, Medical University of Gdańsk, Gdańsk, Poland
| | - Rachel C Jankowitz
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Abramsom Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA
| | - Vincent Vandecaveye
- Department of Radiology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Division of Translational MRI, Department of Imaging and Pathology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Giuseppe Floris
- Department of Pathology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Patrick Neven
- Department of Gynecological Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Hans Wildiers
- Department of General Medical Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Elinor Sawyer
- School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, Guy's Cancer Centre, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Anne Vincent-Salomon
- Department of Pathology, Institut Curie, Paris Sciences Lettres University, Paris, France
| | - Patrick W B Derksen
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Christine Desmedt
- Laboratory for Translational Breast Cancer Research, Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Candito A, Holbrey R, Ribeiro A, Messiou C, Tunariu N, Koh DM, Blackledge MD. Deep Learning for Delineation of the Spinal Canal in Whole-Body Diffusion-Weighted Imaging: Normalising Inter- and Intra-Patient Intensity Signal in Multi-Centre Datasets. Bioengineering (Basel) 2024; 11:130. [PMID: 38391616 PMCID: PMC10885936 DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering11020130] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2023] [Revised: 01/19/2024] [Accepted: 01/24/2024] [Indexed: 02/24/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Whole-Body Diffusion-Weighted Imaging (WBDWI) is an established technique for staging and evaluating treatment response in patients with multiple myeloma (MM) and advanced prostate cancer (APC). However, WBDWI scans show inter- and intra-patient intensity signal variability. This variability poses challenges in accurately quantifying bone disease, tracking changes over follow-up scans, and developing automated tools for bone lesion delineation. Here, we propose a novel automated pipeline for inter-station, inter-scan image signal standardisation on WBDWI that utilizes robust segmentation of the spinal canal through deep learning. METHODS We trained and validated a supervised 2D U-Net model to automatically delineate the spinal canal (both the spinal cord and surrounding cerebrospinal fluid, CSF) in an initial cohort of 40 patients who underwent WBDWI for treatment response evaluation (80 scans in total). Expert-validated contours were used as the target standard. The algorithm was further semi-quantitatively validated on four additional datasets (three internal, one external, 207 scans total) by comparing the distributions of average apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and volume of the spinal cord derived from a two-component Gaussian mixture model of segmented regions. Our pipeline subsequently standardises WBDWI signal intensity through two stages: (i) normalisation of signal between imaging stations within each patient through histogram equalisation of slices acquired on either side of the station gap, and (ii) inter-scan normalisation through histogram equalisation of the signal derived within segmented spinal canal regions. This approach was semi-quantitatively validated in all scans available to the study (N = 287). RESULTS The test dice score, precision, and recall of the spinal canal segmentation model were all above 0.87 when compared to manual delineation. The average ADC for the spinal cord (1.7 × 10-3 mm2/s) showed no significant difference from the manual contours. Furthermore, no significant differences were found between the average ADC values of the spinal cord across the additional four datasets. The signal-normalised, high-b-value images were visualised using a fixed contrast window level and demonstrated qualitatively better signal homogeneity across scans than scans that were not signal-normalised. CONCLUSION Our proposed intensity signal WBDWI normalisation pipeline successfully harmonises intensity values across multi-centre cohorts. The computational time required is less than 10 s, preserving contrast-to-noise and signal-to-noise ratios in axial diffusion-weighted images. Importantly, no changes to the clinical MRI protocol are expected, and there is no need for additional reference MRI data or follow-up scans.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonio Candito
- Division of Radiotherapy and Imaging, The Institute of Cancer Research, London SM2 5NG, UK
| | - Richard Holbrey
- Division of Radiotherapy and Imaging, The Institute of Cancer Research, London SM2 5NG, UK
| | - Ana Ribeiro
- Department of Radiology, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London SW3 6JJ, UK
| | - Christina Messiou
- Division of Radiotherapy and Imaging, The Institute of Cancer Research, London SM2 5NG, UK
- Department of Radiology, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London SW3 6JJ, UK
| | - Nina Tunariu
- Division of Radiotherapy and Imaging, The Institute of Cancer Research, London SM2 5NG, UK
- Department of Radiology, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London SW3 6JJ, UK
| | - Dow-Mu Koh
- Division of Radiotherapy and Imaging, The Institute of Cancer Research, London SM2 5NG, UK
- Department of Radiology, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London SW3 6JJ, UK
| | - Matthew D Blackledge
- Division of Radiotherapy and Imaging, The Institute of Cancer Research, London SM2 5NG, UK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Augustinus S, Thurairajah G, Besselink MG, van Laarhoven HWM, van Oijen MGH, Mackay TM, Wilmink JW. Delayed Versus Immediate Start of Chemotherapy in Asymptomatic Patients With Advanced Cancer: A Meta-Analysis. Oncologist 2023; 28:961-968. [PMID: 37589234 PMCID: PMC10628561 DOI: 10.1093/oncolo/oyad235] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2022] [Accepted: 07/19/2023] [Indexed: 08/18/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Due to increased use of imaging, advanced stages of cancer are increasingly being diagnosed in an early, asymptomatic phase. Traditionally, chemotherapy is started immediately in these patients. However, a strategy wherein chemotherapy is withheld until symptoms occur may be beneficial for patients in terms of quality of life (QOL). A systematic review regarding optimal timing of chemotherapy including survival and QOL is lacking. METHODS We systematically searched PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane for studies investigating the timing of start of chemotherapy in asymptomatic patients with advanced cancer. Overall survival (OS) was abstracted as primary, QOL, and toxicity as secondary outcomes. A meta-analysis was performed on OS. QOL was described using the global health status derived from the EORTC-QLQ-C30 questionnaire and toxicity as grade 3-4 adverse events. RESULTS Overall, 919 patients from 4 randomized controlled trials and 1 retrospective study were included. The included studies investigated colorectal cancer (n = 3), ovarian cancer (n = 1), and gastric cancer (n = 1). Pooled analysis demonstrated no significant differences in OS between delayed and immediate start of chemotherapy (pooled HR: 1.05, 95% CI, 0.90-1.22, P = .52). QOL, evaluated in 3 studies, suggested a better QOL in the delayed treatment group. Toxicity, evaluated in 2 studies, did not differ significantly between groups. CONCLUSION This meta-analysis confirms the need for prospective studies on timing of start of chemotherapy in asymptomatic patients with advanced cancer. The limited evidence available suggests that delayed start of chemotherapy, once symptoms occur, as compared to immediate start in asymptomatic patients does not worsen OS while it may preserve QOL.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simone Augustinus
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Gajanan Thurairajah
- Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marc G Besselink
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Hanneke W M van Laarhoven
- Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Martijn G H van Oijen
- Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Tara M Mackay
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Johanna W Wilmink
- Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Loibl S, Azim HA, Bachelot T, Berveiller P, Bosch A, Cardonick E, Denkert C, Halaska MJ, Hoeltzenbein M, Johansson ALV, Maggen C, Markert UR, Peccatori F, Poortmans P, Saloustros E, Saura C, Schmid P, Stamatakis E, van den Heuvel-Eibrink M, van Gerwen M, Vandecaveye V, Pentheroudakis G, Curigliano G, Amant F. ESMO Expert Consensus Statements on the management of breast cancer during pregnancy (PrBC). Ann Oncol 2023; 34:849-866. [PMID: 37572987 DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2023.08.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2023] [Revised: 07/31/2023] [Accepted: 08/01/2023] [Indexed: 08/14/2023] Open
Abstract
The management of breast cancer during pregnancy (PrBC) is a relatively rare indication and an area where no or little evidence is available since randomized controlled trials cannot be conducted. In general, advances related to breast cancer (BC) treatment outside pregnancy cannot always be translated to PrBC, because both the interests of the mother and of the unborn should be considered. Evidence remains limited and/or conflicting in some specific areas where the optimal approach remains controversial. In 2022, the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) held a virtual consensus-building process on this topic to gain insights from a multidisciplinary group of experts and develop statements on controversial topics that cannot be adequately addressed in the current evidence-based ESMO Clinical Practice Guideline. The aim of this consensus-building process was to discuss controversial issues relating to the management of patients with PrBC. The virtual meeting included a multidisciplinary panel of 24 leading experts from 13 countries and was chaired by S. Loibl and F. Amant. All experts were allocated to one of four different working groups. Each working group covered a specific subject area with two chairs appointed: Planning, preparation and execution of the consensus process was conducted according to the ESMO standard operating procedures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Loibl
- GBG c/o GBG Forschungs GmbH, Neu-Isenburg; Centre for Haematology and Oncology Bethanien, Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt; Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt, Germany.
| | - H A Azim
- Breast Cancer Center, School of Medicine, Tecnologico de Monterrey, San Pedro Garza Garcia, Nuevo Leon, Mexico
| | - T Bachelot
- Department of medical oncology, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France
| | - P Berveiller
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Poissy-Saint Germain Hospital, Poissy; UMR 1198 - BREED, INRAE, Paris Saclay University, RHuMA, Montigny-Le-Bretonneux, France
| | - A Bosch
- Division of Oncology, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund; Department of Hematology, Oncology and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | - E Cardonick
- Cooper Medical School at Rowan University, Camden, USA
| | - C Denkert
- Philipps-University Marburg and Marburg University Hospital (UKGM), Marburg, Germany
| | - M J Halaska
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague and Universital Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - M Hoeltzenbein
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Institute of Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology, Embryotox Center of Clinical Teratology and Drug Safety in Pregnancy, Berlin, Germany
| | - A L V Johansson
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway
| | - C Maggen
- Department of Obstetrics and Prenatal Medicine, University Hospital Brussels, Brussels, Belgium
| | - U R Markert
- Placenta Lab, Department of Obstetrics, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany
| | - F Peccatori
- Gynecologic Oncology Department, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - P Poortmans
- Iridium Netwerk, Antwerp; University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - E Saloustros
- Department of Oncology, University General Hospital of Larissa, Larissa, Greece
| | - C Saura
- Medical Oncology Department, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Barcelona, Spain
| | - P Schmid
- Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University London, London, UK
| | - E Stamatakis
- Department of Anesthesiology, 'Alexandra' General Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | | | - M van Gerwen
- Gynecologic Oncology, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek-Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam; Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Psychosocial Care, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam; Princess Maxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - V Vandecaveye
- Department of Radiology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - G Pentheroudakis
- European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO), Lugano, Switzerland
| | - G Curigliano
- Division of Early Drug Development, European Institute of Oncology, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), Milan; Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - F Amant
- Gynecologic Oncology, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek-Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam; Division Gynaecologic Oncology, UZ Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Cruz IAN, Fayad LM, Ahlawat S, Lederman HM, Nico MAC, Ormond Filho AG, Guimarães JB. Whole-Body MRI in Musculoskeletal Oncology: A Comprehensive Review with Recommendations. Radiol Imaging Cancer 2023; 5:e220107. [PMID: 37144975 DOI: 10.1148/rycan.220107] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/06/2023]
Abstract
Whole-body (WB) MRI has emerged as an attractive method for oncologic evaluation, potentially replacing conventional imaging modalities and providing a one-step wide-coverage assessment of both the skeleton and soft tissues. In addition to providing anatomic information, WB MRI may also yield a functional analysis with the inclusion of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI). DWI translates microstructural changes, resulting in an excellent alternative to fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT. WB MRI (with DWI) offers comparable accuracy to PET/CT and has the advantage of avoiding ionizing radiation. Technological advances and the development of faster protocols have prompted greater accessibility of WB MRI, with growing applications in routine practice for the diagnosis, staging, and follow-up of cancer. This review discusses the technical considerations, clinical applications, and accuracy of WB MRI in musculoskeletal oncology. Keywords: Pediatrics, MR Imaging, Skeletal-Axial, Skeletal-Appendicular, Soft Tissues/Skin, Bone Marrow, Extremities, Oncology, Musculoskeletal Imaging © RSNA, 2023.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Isabela A N Cruz
- From the Department of Musculoskeletal Radiology, Fleury Medicina e Saúde Higienópolis, R. Mato Grosso 306, Higienópolis, SP, Brazil 01239-040 (I.A.N.C., M.A.C.N., A.G.O.F., J.B.G.); Department of Radiology, Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP), São Paulo, Brazil (I.A.N.C., H.M.L., J.B.G.); The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, The Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Md (L.M.F., S.A.); and Department of Radiology, Pediatric Oncology Institute, Grupo de Apoio ao Adolescente e à Criança com Câncer (GRAACC), São Paulo, Brazil (H.M.L., J.B.G.)
| | - Laura M Fayad
- From the Department of Musculoskeletal Radiology, Fleury Medicina e Saúde Higienópolis, R. Mato Grosso 306, Higienópolis, SP, Brazil 01239-040 (I.A.N.C., M.A.C.N., A.G.O.F., J.B.G.); Department of Radiology, Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP), São Paulo, Brazil (I.A.N.C., H.M.L., J.B.G.); The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, The Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Md (L.M.F., S.A.); and Department of Radiology, Pediatric Oncology Institute, Grupo de Apoio ao Adolescente e à Criança com Câncer (GRAACC), São Paulo, Brazil (H.M.L., J.B.G.)
| | - Shivani Ahlawat
- From the Department of Musculoskeletal Radiology, Fleury Medicina e Saúde Higienópolis, R. Mato Grosso 306, Higienópolis, SP, Brazil 01239-040 (I.A.N.C., M.A.C.N., A.G.O.F., J.B.G.); Department of Radiology, Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP), São Paulo, Brazil (I.A.N.C., H.M.L., J.B.G.); The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, The Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Md (L.M.F., S.A.); and Department of Radiology, Pediatric Oncology Institute, Grupo de Apoio ao Adolescente e à Criança com Câncer (GRAACC), São Paulo, Brazil (H.M.L., J.B.G.)
| | - Henrique M Lederman
- From the Department of Musculoskeletal Radiology, Fleury Medicina e Saúde Higienópolis, R. Mato Grosso 306, Higienópolis, SP, Brazil 01239-040 (I.A.N.C., M.A.C.N., A.G.O.F., J.B.G.); Department of Radiology, Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP), São Paulo, Brazil (I.A.N.C., H.M.L., J.B.G.); The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, The Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Md (L.M.F., S.A.); and Department of Radiology, Pediatric Oncology Institute, Grupo de Apoio ao Adolescente e à Criança com Câncer (GRAACC), São Paulo, Brazil (H.M.L., J.B.G.)
| | - Marcelo A C Nico
- From the Department of Musculoskeletal Radiology, Fleury Medicina e Saúde Higienópolis, R. Mato Grosso 306, Higienópolis, SP, Brazil 01239-040 (I.A.N.C., M.A.C.N., A.G.O.F., J.B.G.); Department of Radiology, Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP), São Paulo, Brazil (I.A.N.C., H.M.L., J.B.G.); The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, The Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Md (L.M.F., S.A.); and Department of Radiology, Pediatric Oncology Institute, Grupo de Apoio ao Adolescente e à Criança com Câncer (GRAACC), São Paulo, Brazil (H.M.L., J.B.G.)
| | - Alípio G Ormond Filho
- From the Department of Musculoskeletal Radiology, Fleury Medicina e Saúde Higienópolis, R. Mato Grosso 306, Higienópolis, SP, Brazil 01239-040 (I.A.N.C., M.A.C.N., A.G.O.F., J.B.G.); Department of Radiology, Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP), São Paulo, Brazil (I.A.N.C., H.M.L., J.B.G.); The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, The Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Md (L.M.F., S.A.); and Department of Radiology, Pediatric Oncology Institute, Grupo de Apoio ao Adolescente e à Criança com Câncer (GRAACC), São Paulo, Brazil (H.M.L., J.B.G.)
| | - Júlio Brandão Guimarães
- From the Department of Musculoskeletal Radiology, Fleury Medicina e Saúde Higienópolis, R. Mato Grosso 306, Higienópolis, SP, Brazil 01239-040 (I.A.N.C., M.A.C.N., A.G.O.F., J.B.G.); Department of Radiology, Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP), São Paulo, Brazil (I.A.N.C., H.M.L., J.B.G.); The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, The Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Md (L.M.F., S.A.); and Department of Radiology, Pediatric Oncology Institute, Grupo de Apoio ao Adolescente e à Criança com Câncer (GRAACC), São Paulo, Brazil (H.M.L., J.B.G.)
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Merloni F, Palleschi M, Casadei C, Romeo A, Curcio A, Casadei R, Stella F, Ercolani G, Gianni C, Sirico M, Cima S, Sarti S, Cecconetto L, Di Menna G, De Giorgi U. Oligometastatic breast cancer and metastasis-directed treatment: an aggressive multimodal approach to reach the cure. Ther Adv Med Oncol 2023; 15:17588359231161412. [PMID: 36950272 PMCID: PMC10026139 DOI: 10.1177/17588359231161412] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2022] [Accepted: 02/16/2023] [Indexed: 03/20/2023] Open
Abstract
Metastatic breast cancer (BC) is considered an incurable disease and is usually treated with palliative intent. However, about 50% of metastatic BCs present with only a few metastatic lesions and are characterized by longer overall survival. These patients, defined as oligometastatic, could benefit from a multimodal approach, which combines systemic therapy with metastasis-directed treatment (stereotactic ablative therapy or surgery). The current definition of oligometastatic seems incomplete since it is based only on imaging findings and does not include biological features, and the majority of relevant data supporting this strategy comes from retrospective or non-randomized studies. However, the chance of reaching long-term complete remission or even a cure has led to the development of randomized trials investigating the impact of combined treatment in oligometastatic BC (OMBC). The SABR-COMET trial, the first randomized study to include BC patients, showed promising results from a combination of stereotactic ablative radiotherapy and systemic therapy. Considering the randomized trial's results, multidisciplinary teams should be set up to select OMBC patients who could achieve long-term survival with aggressive multimodal treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Michela Palleschi
- Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS Istituto
Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) “Dino Amadori”, Meldola,
Italy
| | - Chiara Casadei
- Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS Istituto
Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) “Dino Amadori”, Meldola,
Italy
| | - Antonino Romeo
- Radiotherapy Unit, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per
lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) “Dino Amadori”, Meldola, Italy
| | - Annalisa Curcio
- Breast Surgery Unit, Pierantoni-Morgagni
Hospital Forlì and Santa Maria delle Croci Hospital, Ravenna, Italy
| | - Roberto Casadei
- Orthopedic Unit, Morgagni-Pierantoni Hospital,
Ausl Romagna, Forlì, Italy
| | - Franco Stella
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Department of
Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine—DIMES of the Alma Mater
Studiorum, University of Bologna, Forlì, Italy
| | - Giorgio Ercolani
- Department of Medical and Surgical
Sciences-DIMEC, Alma Mater Studiorum – University of Bologna, Bologna,
Italy
- General and Oncology Surgery,
Morgagni-Pierantoni Hospital, Ausl Romagna, Forlì, Italy
| | - Caterina Gianni
- Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS Istituto
Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) “Dino Amadori”, Meldola,
Italy
| | - Marianna Sirico
- Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS Istituto
Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) “Dino Amadori”, Meldola,
Italy
| | - Simona Cima
- Radiotherapy Unit, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo
per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) “Dino Amadori”, Meldola, Italy
| | - Samanta Sarti
- Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS Istituto
Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) “Dino Amadori”, Meldola,
Italy
| | - Lorenzo Cecconetto
- Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS Istituto
Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) “Dino Amadori”, Meldola,
Italy
| | - Giandomenico Di Menna
- Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS Istituto
Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) “Dino Amadori”, Meldola,
Italy
| | - Ugo De Giorgi
- Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS Istituto
Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) “Dino Amadori”, Meldola,
Italy
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Van Baelen K, Geukens T, Maetens M, Tjan-Heijnen V, Lord CJ, Linn S, Bidard FC, Richard F, Yang WW, Steele RE, Pettitt SJ, Van Ongeval C, De Schepper M, Isnaldi E, Nevelsteen I, Smeets A, Punie K, Voorwerk L, Wildiers H, Floris G, Vincent-Salomon A, Derksen PWB, Neven P, Senkus E, Sawyer E, Kok M, Desmedt C. Current and future diagnostic and treatment strategies for patients with invasive lobular breast cancer. Ann Oncol 2022; 33:769-785. [PMID: 35605746 DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2022.05.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2022] [Revised: 05/06/2022] [Accepted: 05/17/2022] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Invasive lobular breast cancer (ILC) is the second most common type of breast cancer after invasive breast cancer of no special type (NST), representing up to 15% of all breast cancers. DESIGN Latest data on ILC are presented, focusing on diagnosis, molecular make-up according to the European Society for Medical Oncology Scale for Clinical Actionability of molecular Targets (ESCAT) guidelines, treatment in the early and metastatic setting and ILC-focused clinical trials. RESULTS At the imaging level, magnetic resonance imaging-based and novel positron emission tomography/computed tomography-based techniques can overcome the limitations of currently used imaging techniques for diagnosing ILC. At the pathology level, E-cadherin immunohistochemistry could help improving inter-pathologist agreement. The majority of patients with ILC do not seem to benefit as much from (neo-)adjuvant chemotherapy as patients with NST, although chemotherapy might be required in a subset of high-risk patients. No differences in treatment efficacy are seen for anti-human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) therapies in the adjuvant setting and cyclin-dependent kinases 4 and 6 inhibitors in the metastatic setting. The clinical utility of the commercially available prognostic gene expression-based tests is unclear for patients with ILC. Several ESCAT alterations differ in frequency between ILC and NST. Germline BRCA1 and PALB2 alterations are less frequent in patients with ILC, while germline CDH1 (gene coding for E-cadherin) alterations are more frequent in patients with ILC. Somatic HER2 mutations are more frequent in ILC, especially in metastases (15% ILC versus 5% NST). A high tumour mutational burden, relevant for immune checkpoint inhibition, is more frequent in ILC metastases (16%) than in NST metastases (5%). Tumours with somatic inactivating CDH1 mutations may be vulnerable for treatment with ROS1 inhibitors, a concept currently investigated in early and metastatic ILC. CONCLUSION ILC is a unique malignancy based on its pathological and biological features leading to differences in diagnosis as well as in treatment response, resistance and targets as compared to NST.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K Van Baelen
- Laboratory for Translational Breast Cancer Research (LTBCR), Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Departments of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, UZ Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - T Geukens
- Laboratory for Translational Breast Cancer Research (LTBCR), Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; General Medical Oncology, UZ Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - M Maetens
- Laboratory for Translational Breast Cancer Research (LTBCR), Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - V Tjan-Heijnen
- Medical Oncology Department, Maastricht University Medical Center (MUMC), School of GROW, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - C J Lord
- The CRUK Gene Function Laboratory and Breast Cancer Now Toby Robins Research Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - S Linn
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands; Departments of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Molecular Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - F-C Bidard
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Curie, UVSQ/Paris-Saclav University, Paris, France
| | - F Richard
- Laboratory for Translational Breast Cancer Research (LTBCR), Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - W W Yang
- The CRUK Gene Function Laboratory and Breast Cancer Now Toby Robins Research Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - R E Steele
- The CRUK Gene Function Laboratory and Breast Cancer Now Toby Robins Research Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - S J Pettitt
- The CRUK Gene Function Laboratory and Breast Cancer Now Toby Robins Research Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - C Van Ongeval
- Departments of Radiology, UZ Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - M De Schepper
- Laboratory for Translational Breast Cancer Research (LTBCR), Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Pathology, UZ Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - E Isnaldi
- Laboratory for Translational Breast Cancer Research (LTBCR), Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | | | - A Smeets
- Surgical Oncology, UZ Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - K Punie
- General Medical Oncology, UZ Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - L Voorwerk
- Departments of Medical Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Tumour Biology and Immunology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - H Wildiers
- General Medical Oncology, UZ Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - G Floris
- Pathology, UZ Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | | | - P W B Derksen
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - P Neven
- Departments of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, UZ Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - E Senkus
- Department of Oncology and Radiotherapy, Medical University of Gdańsk, Gdańsk, Poland
| | - E Sawyer
- School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, Guy's Cancer Centre, King's College London, London, UK
| | - M Kok
- Departments of Medical Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Tumour Biology and Immunology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - C Desmedt
- Laboratory for Translational Breast Cancer Research (LTBCR), Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Bhaludin BN, Tunariu N, Senthivel N, Babiker A, Soneji ND, Hujairi N, Sharma B, McGrath SE, Okines AF, Ring AE, Messiou C, Downey K, Koh DM. Does the addition of whole-body MRI to routine imaging influence real-world treatment decisions in metastatic breast cancer? Cancer Imaging 2022; 22:26. [PMID: 35672838 PMCID: PMC9172188 DOI: 10.1186/s40644-022-00464-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2021] [Accepted: 05/26/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The assessment of metastatic breast cancer (MBC) can be limited with routine imaging such as computed tomography (CT) especially in bone-only or bone-predominant disease. This analysis investigates the effects of the use of WBMRI in addition to the use of routine CT, bone scintigraphy (BS) and fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography with computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT) on influencing systemic anti-cancer treatment (SACT) decisions in patients with known MBC. Methods MBC patients undergoing SACT who had WBMRI undertaken within 8 weeks of either a routine CT, BS or FDG-PET/CT were reviewed retrospectively. The clinical indications for undertaking the WBMRI examinations were recorded. Data on the extent and distribution of the disease were collected and discordance/concordance of disease status across the imaging modalities were compared. SACT decisions at each time point were also evaluated. Results There were 105 MBC patients with 148 WBMRI studies paired with CT, BS or FDG-PET/CT. 50 pairs (33.8%) showed differences in the extent of disease, with 44 pairs due to additional sites (AS) reported on WBMRI alone. 81 patients (Group 1) had one WBMRI paired with routine imaging due to a variety of indications, with clinical symptoms (such as bone pain) being the most common (24.7%). 24 patients (Group 2) had more than one WBMRI study paired with routine imaging comprising 67 pairs. 13/67 pairs (19.4%) showed discordance in assessments. 10/13 pairs had progressive disease (PD) reported on WBMRI alone. SACT change due to AS reported on WBMRI alone occurred in 21/23 pairs (91.3%) in Group 1. SACT change due to PD reported on WBMRI alone in Group 2 occurred in 6/14 pairs (42.9%). SACT change due to AS/PD in both groups occurred in 11/102 pairs (10.8%) with known invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) and 13/28 pairs (46.4%) with invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC). Conclusions The use of WBMRI in MBC led to earlier recognition of PD and SACT change compared with the other imaging modalities. A higher proportion of discordant response assessments and SACT changes were observed in ILC compared with IDC in our patient group, although larger-scale studies are required to investigate this further.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Basrull N Bhaludin
- Department of Radiology, The Royal Marsden Hospital, 203 Fulham Rd, London, SW3 6JJ, England, UK.
| | - Nina Tunariu
- Department of Radiology, The Royal Marsden Hospital, Downs Rd, Sutton, SM2 5PT, England, UK.,Institute of Cancer Research, London, England, UK
| | - Nishanthi Senthivel
- Department of Medicine - Breast Unit, The Royal Marsden Hospital, Downs Rd, Sutton, SM2 5PT, England, UK
| | - Amna Babiker
- Department of Medicine - Breast Unit, The Royal Marsden Hospital, Downs Rd, Sutton, SM2 5PT, England, UK
| | - Neil D Soneji
- Department of Radiology, The Royal Marsden Hospital, 203 Fulham Rd, London, SW3 6JJ, England, UK.,Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, Fulham Palace Rd, London, W6 8RF, England, UK
| | - Nabil Hujairi
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, The Royal Marsden Hospital, 203 Fulham Rd, London, SW3 6JJ, England, UK
| | - Bhupinder Sharma
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, The Royal Marsden Hospital, 203 Fulham Rd, London, SW3 6JJ, England, UK
| | - Sophie E McGrath
- Department of Medicine - Breast Unit, The Royal Marsden Hospital, Downs Rd, Sutton, SM2 5PT, England, UK
| | - Alicia F Okines
- Department of Medicine - Breast Unit, The Royal Marsden Hospital, 203 Fulham Rd, London, SW3 6JJ, England, UK
| | - Alistair E Ring
- Department of Medicine - Breast Unit, The Royal Marsden Hospital, Downs Rd, Sutton, SM2 5PT, England, UK
| | - Christina Messiou
- Department of Radiology, The Royal Marsden Hospital, Downs Rd, Sutton, SM2 5PT, England, UK.,Institute of Cancer Research, London, England, UK
| | - Kate Downey
- Department of Radiology, The Royal Marsden Hospital, 203 Fulham Rd, London, SW3 6JJ, England, UK
| | - Dow-Mu Koh
- Department of Radiology, The Royal Marsden Hospital, Downs Rd, Sutton, SM2 5PT, England, UK.,Institute of Cancer Research, London, England, UK
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Bhaludin BN, Tunariu N, Koh DM, Messiou C, Okines AF, McGrath SE, Ring AE, Parton MM, Sharma B, Gagliardi T, Allen SD, Pope R, Johnston SRD, Downey K. A review on the added value of whole-body MRI in metastatic lobular breast cancer. Eur Radiol 2022; 32:6514-6525. [PMID: 35384456 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-022-08714-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2021] [Revised: 03/02/2022] [Accepted: 03/04/2022] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
Invasive lobular breast carcinomas (ILC) account for approximately 15% of breast cancer diagnoses. They can be difficult to diagnose both clinically and radiologically, due to their infiltrative growth pattern. The pattern of metastasis of ILC is unusual, with spread to the serosal surfaces (pleura and peritoneum), retroperitoneum and gastrointestinal (GI)/genitourinary (GU) tracts and a higher rate of leptomeningeal spread than IDC. Routine staging and response assessment with computed tomography (CT) can be undertaken quickly and measurements can be reproduced easily, but this is challenging with metastatic ILC as bone-only/bone-predominant patterns are frequently seen and assessment of the disease status is limited in these scenarios. Functional imaging such as whole-body MRI (WBMRI) allows the assessment of bone and soft tissue disease by providing functional information related to differences in cellular density between malignant and benign tissues. A number of recent studies have shown that WBMRI can detect additional sites of disease in metastatic breast cancer (MBC), resulting in a change in systemic anti-cancer therapy. Although WBMRI and fluorodeoxyglucose-positron-emission tomography-computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT) have a comparable performance in the assessment of MBC, WBMRI can be particularly valuable as a proportion of ILC are non-FDG-avid, resulting in the underestimation of the disease extent. In this review, we explore the added value of WBMRI in the evaluation of metastatic ILC and compare it with other imaging modalities such as CT and FDG-PET/CT. We also discuss the spectrum of WBMRI findings of the different metastatic sites of ILC with CT and FDG-PET/CT correlation. KEY POINTS: • ILC has an unusual pattern of spread compared to IDC, with metastases to the peritoneum, retroperitoneum and GI and GU tracts, but the bones and liver are the commonest sites. • WBMRI allows functional assessment of metastatic disease, particularly in bone-only and bone-predominant metastatic cancers such as ILC where evaluation with CT can be challenging and limited. • WBMRI can detect more sites of disease compared with CT, can reveal disease progression earlier and provides the opportunity to change ineffective systemic treatment sooner.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Basrull N Bhaludin
- Department of Radiology, The Royal Marsden Hospital, 203 Fulham Rd, London, England, SW3 6JJ, UK.
| | - Nina Tunariu
- Department of Radiology, The Royal Marsden Hospital, Downs Rd, Sutton, England, SM2 5PT, UK.,Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Dow-Mu Koh
- Department of Radiology, The Royal Marsden Hospital, Downs Rd, Sutton, England, SM2 5PT, UK.,Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Christina Messiou
- Department of Radiology, The Royal Marsden Hospital, Downs Rd, Sutton, England, SM2 5PT, UK.,Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Alicia F Okines
- Breast Unit, The Royal Marsden Hospital, 203 Fulham Rd, London, England, SW3 6JJ, UK
| | - Sophie E McGrath
- Breast Unit, The Royal Marsden Hospital, Downs Rd, Sutton, England, SM2 5PT, UK
| | - Alistair E Ring
- Breast Unit, The Royal Marsden Hospital, Downs Rd, Sutton, England, SM2 5PT, UK
| | - Marina M Parton
- Breast Unit, The Royal Marsden Hospital, 203 Fulham Rd, London, England, SW3 6JJ, UK
| | - Bhupinder Sharma
- Department of Radiology, The Royal Marsden Hospital, 203 Fulham Rd, London, England, SW3 6JJ, UK
| | - Tanja Gagliardi
- Department of Radiology, The Royal Marsden Hospital, 203 Fulham Rd, London, England, SW3 6JJ, UK
| | - Steven D Allen
- Department of Radiology, The Royal Marsden Hospital, 203 Fulham Rd, London, England, SW3 6JJ, UK
| | - Romney Pope
- Department of Radiology, The Royal Marsden Hospital, 203 Fulham Rd, London, England, SW3 6JJ, UK
| | - Stephen R D Johnston
- Breast Unit, The Royal Marsden Hospital, 203 Fulham Rd, London, England, SW3 6JJ, UK
| | - Kate Downey
- Department of Radiology, The Royal Marsden Hospital, 203 Fulham Rd, London, England, SW3 6JJ, UK
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Eissawy MG, Saadawy AMI, Farag K, Akl T, Kamr WH. Accuracy and diagnostic value of diffusion-weighted whole body imaging with background body signal suppression (DWIBS) in metastatic breast cancer. THE EGYPTIAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE 2021. [DOI: 10.1186/s43055-021-00451-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Breast cancer is the most common malignant tumor among women. The mortality of the patients could be mainly attributed to metastasis and spread of breast cancer to distant sites. The objective of the current study is to evaluate and express the role of diffusion-weighted whole body imaging with background body signal suppression (DWIBS) in detection of osseous and soft tissue metastatic lesions in patients with cancer breast.
Results
The current prospective study included 50 female patients with pathologically proven breast cancer. The overall sensitivity of DWIBS and STIR were 97.5% and 92.5%, respectively. DWIBS was the most sensitive sequence with highest negative predictive values. DWIBS and STIR were the most sensitive with the highest negative predictive value. Both DWIBS and STIR detected more vertebral metastatic deposits (100% and 97.8%, respectively) and more soft tissue lesions (94.4% for both) than WB DWI and T1WI.
Conclusion
DWIBS MRI sequence is an effective method for detection of solid organ, bone and lymph node metastasis but not specific for characterization of lesions.
Collapse
|
14
|
Oprea-Lager DE, Cysouw MC, Boellaard R, Deroose CM, de Geus-Oei LF, Lopci E, Bidaut L, Herrmann K, Fournier LS, Bäuerle T, deSouza NM, Lecouvet FE. Bone Metastases Are Measurable: The Role of Whole-Body MRI and Positron Emission Tomography. Front Oncol 2021; 11:772530. [PMID: 34869009 PMCID: PMC8640187 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.772530] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2021] [Accepted: 11/04/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Metastatic tumor deposits in bone marrow elicit differential bone responses that vary with the type of malignancy. This results in either sclerotic, lytic, or mixed bone lesions, which can change in morphology due to treatment effects and/or secondary bone remodeling. Hence, morphological imaging is regarded unsuitable for response assessment of bone metastases and in the current Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors 1.1 (RECIST1.1) guideline bone metastases are deemed unmeasurable. Nevertheless, the advent of functional and molecular imaging modalities such as whole-body magnetic resonance imaging (WB-MRI) and positron emission tomography (PET) has improved the ability for follow-up of bone metastases, regardless of their morphology. Both these modalities not only have improved sensitivity for visual detection of bone lesions, but also allow for objective measurements of bone lesion characteristics. WB-MRI provides a global assessment of skeletal metastases and for a one-step "all-organ" approach of metastatic disease. Novel MRI techniques include diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) targeting highly cellular lesions, dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) for quantitative assessment of bone lesion vascularization, and multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) combining anatomical and functional sequences. Recommendations for a homogenization of MRI image acquisitions and generalizable response criteria have been developed. For PET, many metabolic and molecular radiotracers are available, some targeting tumor characteristics not confined to cancer type (e.g. 18F-FDG) while other targeted radiotracers target specific molecular characteristics, such as prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA) ligands for prostate cancer. Supporting data on quantitative PET analysis regarding repeatability, reproducibility, and harmonization of PET/CT system performance is available. Bone metastases detected on PET and MRI can be quantitatively assessed using validated methodologies, both on a whole-body and individual lesion basis. Both have the advantage of covering not only bone lesions but visceral and nodal lesions as well. Hybrid imaging, combining PET with MRI, may provide complementary parameters on the morphologic, functional, metabolic and molecular level of bone metastases in one examination. For clinical implementation of measuring bone metastases in response assessment using WB-MRI and PET, current RECIST1.1 guidelines need to be adapted. This review summarizes available data and insights into imaging of bone metastases using MRI and PET.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniela E. Oprea-Lager
- Imaging Group, European Organisation of Research and Treatment in Cancer (EORTC), Brussels, Belgium
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Matthijs C.F. Cysouw
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Ronald Boellaard
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Christophe M. Deroose
- Imaging Group, European Organisation of Research and Treatment in Cancer (EORTC), Brussels, Belgium
- Nuclear Medicine, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Nuclear Medicine & Molecular Imaging, Department of Imaging and Pathology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Lioe-Fee de Geus-Oei
- Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
- Biomedical Photonic Imaging Group, University of Twente, Enschede, Netherlands
| | - Egesta Lopci
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, IRCCS – Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Luc Bidaut
- Imaging Group, European Organisation of Research and Treatment in Cancer (EORTC), Brussels, Belgium
- College of Science, University of Lincoln, Lincoln, United Kingdom
| | - Ken Herrmann
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen, and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK)-University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Laure S. Fournier
- Imaging Group, European Organisation of Research and Treatment in Cancer (EORTC), Brussels, Belgium
- Paris Cardiovascular Research Center (PARCC), Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM), Radiology Department, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Hopital europeen Georges Pompidou, Université de Paris, Paris, France
- European Imaging Biomarkers Alliance (EIBALL), European Society of Radiology, Vienna, Austria
| | - Tobias Bäuerle
- Institute of Radiology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Nandita M. deSouza
- Imaging Group, European Organisation of Research and Treatment in Cancer (EORTC), Brussels, Belgium
- European Imaging Biomarkers Alliance (EIBALL), European Society of Radiology, Vienna, Austria
- Division of Radiotherapy and Imaging, The Institute of Cancer Research and Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Frederic E. Lecouvet
- Imaging Group, European Organisation of Research and Treatment in Cancer (EORTC), Brussels, Belgium
- Department of Radiology, Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique (IREC), Cliniques Universitaires Saint Luc, Université Catholique de Louvain (UCLouvain), Brussels, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Colombo A, Bombelli L, Summers PE, Saia G, Zugni F, Marvaso G, Grimm R, Jereczek-Fossa BA, Padhani AR, Petralia G. Effects of Sex and Age on Fat Fraction, Diffusion-Weighted Image Signal Intensity and Apparent Diffusion Coefficient in the Bone Marrow of Asymptomatic Individuals: A Cross-Sectional Whole-Body MRI Study. Diagnostics (Basel) 2021; 11:diagnostics11050913. [PMID: 34065459 PMCID: PMC8161193 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics11050913] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2021] [Revised: 05/18/2021] [Accepted: 05/18/2021] [Indexed: 01/23/2023] Open
Abstract
We aimed to describe the relationships between the relative fat fraction (%FF), muscle-normalized diffusion-weighted (DW) image signal intensity and water apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), sex and age for normal bone marrow, in the normal population. Our retrospective cohort consisted of 100 asymptomatic individuals, equally divided by sex and 10-year age groups, who underwent whole-body MRI at 1.5 T for early cancer detection. Semi-automated segmentation of global bone marrow volume was performed using the DW images and the resulting segmentation masks were projected onto the ADC and %FF maps for extraction of parameter values. Differences in the parameter values between sexes at age ranges were assessed using the Mann–Whitney and Kruskal–Wallis tests. The Spearman correlation coefficient r was used to assess the relationship of each imaging parameter with age, and of %FF with ADC and normalized DW signal intensity values. The average %FF of normal bone marrow was 65.6 ± 7.2%, while nSIb50, nSIb900 and ADC were 1.7 ± 0.5, 3.2 ± 0.9 and 422 ± 67 μm2/s, respectively. The bone marrow %FF values increased with age in both sexes (r = 0.63 and r = 0.64, respectively, p < 0.001). Values of nSIb50 and nSIb900 were higher in younger women compared to men of the same age groups (p < 0.017), but this difference decreased with age. In our cohort of asymptomatic individuals, the values of bone marrow relative %FF, normalized DW image signal intensity and ADC indicate higher cellularity in premenopausal women, with increasing bone marrow fat with aging in both sexes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alberto Colombo
- Division of Radiology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy; (L.B.); (P.E.S.); (G.S.); (F.Z.)
- Correspondence:
| | - Luca Bombelli
- Division of Radiology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy; (L.B.); (P.E.S.); (G.S.); (F.Z.)
| | - Paul E. Summers
- Division of Radiology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy; (L.B.); (P.E.S.); (G.S.); (F.Z.)
| | - Giulia Saia
- Division of Radiology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy; (L.B.); (P.E.S.); (G.S.); (F.Z.)
| | - Fabio Zugni
- Division of Radiology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy; (L.B.); (P.E.S.); (G.S.); (F.Z.)
| | - Giulia Marvaso
- Division of Radiotherapy, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy; (G.M.); (B.A.J.-F.)
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy;
| | - Robert Grimm
- MR Applications Pre-Development, Siemens Healthcare, 91052 Erlangen, Germany;
| | - Barbara A. Jereczek-Fossa
- Division of Radiotherapy, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy; (G.M.); (B.A.J.-F.)
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy;
| | - Anwar R. Padhani
- Paul Strickland Scanner Centre, Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Northwood HA6 2RN, UK;
| | - Giuseppe Petralia
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy;
- Precision Imaging and Research Unit, Department of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Winfield JM, Blackledge MD, Tunariu N, Koh DM, Messiou C. Whole-body MRI: a practical guide for imaging patients with malignant bone disease. Clin Radiol 2021; 76:715-727. [PMID: 33934876 DOI: 10.1016/j.crad.2021.04.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2020] [Accepted: 04/08/2021] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
Whole-body magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is now a crucial tool for the assessment of the extent of systemic malignant bone disease and response to treatment, and forms part of national and international recommendations for imaging patients with myeloma or metastatic prostate cancer. Recent developments in scanners have enabled acquisition of good-quality whole-body MRI data within 45 minutes on modern MRI systems from all main manufacturers. This provides complimentary morphological and functional whole-body imaging; however, lack of prior experience and acquisition times required can act as a barrier to adoption in busy radiology departments. This article aims to tackle the former by reviewing the indications and providing guidance for technical delivery and clinical interpretation of whole-body MRI for patients with malignant bone disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J M Winfield
- Division of Radiotherapy and Imaging, The Institute of Cancer Research, 123 Old Brompton Road, London, SW7 3RP, UK; MRI Unit, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Downs Road, Sutton, Surrey, SM2 5PT, UK
| | - M D Blackledge
- Division of Radiotherapy and Imaging, The Institute of Cancer Research, 123 Old Brompton Road, London, SW7 3RP, UK; MRI Unit, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Downs Road, Sutton, Surrey, SM2 5PT, UK
| | - N Tunariu
- Division of Radiotherapy and Imaging, The Institute of Cancer Research, 123 Old Brompton Road, London, SW7 3RP, UK; MRI Unit, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Downs Road, Sutton, Surrey, SM2 5PT, UK
| | - D-M Koh
- Division of Radiotherapy and Imaging, The Institute of Cancer Research, 123 Old Brompton Road, London, SW7 3RP, UK; MRI Unit, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Downs Road, Sutton, Surrey, SM2 5PT, UK
| | - C Messiou
- Division of Radiotherapy and Imaging, The Institute of Cancer Research, 123 Old Brompton Road, London, SW7 3RP, UK; MRI Unit, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Downs Road, Sutton, Surrey, SM2 5PT, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Switlyk MD. Magnetic resonance imaging for assessing treatment response in bone marrow metastases. Acta Radiol 2021; 62:483-499. [PMID: 31154803 DOI: 10.1177/0284185119851234] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Cancer metastasis to bone is a frequent observation in malignancy that may result in complications such as pathological fractures and spinal cord compression. Monitoring treatment effects is the main concern in oncology; however, the evaluation of treatment response in bone is particularly challenging as it lacks well-established criteria. In addition, bone metastases have traditionally been considered non-measurable manifestations of cancer. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is one of the most specific and sensitive methods for imaging skeletal metastases. The aim of this article is to highlight the diagnostic performance of MRI in the treatment monitoring of bone metastases, to review the current literature, and to provide an overview of recommendations for the evaluation of treatment response in bone.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marta D Switlyk
- Department of Radiology, Radiumhospitalet, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Colombo A, Saia G, Azzena AA, Rossi A, Zugni F, Pricolo P, Summers PE, Marvaso G, Grimm R, Bellomi M, Jereczek-Fossa BA, Padhani AR, Petralia G. Semi-Automated Segmentation of Bone Metastases from Whole-Body MRI: Reproducibility of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Measurements. Diagnostics (Basel) 2021; 11:diagnostics11030499. [PMID: 33799913 PMCID: PMC7998160 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics11030499] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2021] [Revised: 03/05/2021] [Accepted: 03/09/2021] [Indexed: 01/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Using semi-automated software simplifies quantitative analysis of the visible burden of disease on whole-body MRI diffusion-weighted images. To establish the intra- and inter-observer reproducibility of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) measures, we retrospectively analyzed data from 20 patients with bone metastases from breast (BCa; n = 10; aged 62.3 ± 14.8) or prostate cancer (PCa; n = 10; aged 67.4 ± 9.0) who had undergone examinations at two timepoints, before and after hormone-therapy. Four independent observers processed all images twice, first segmenting the entire skeleton on diffusion-weighted images, and then isolating bone metastases via ADC histogram thresholding (ADC: 650–1400 µm2/s). Dice Similarity, Bland-Altman method, and Intraclass Correlation Coefficient were used to assess reproducibility. Inter-observer Dice similarity was moderate (0.71) for women with BCa and poor (0.40) for men with PCa. Nonetheless, the limits of agreement of the mean ADC were just ±6% for women with BCa and ±10% for men with PCa (mean ADCs: 941 and 999 µm2/s, respectively). Inter-observer Intraclass Correlation Coefficients of the ADC histogram parameters were consistently greater in women with BCa than in men with PCa. While scope remains for improving consistency of the volume segmented, the observer-dependent variability measured in this study was appropriate to distinguish the clinically meaningful changes of ADC observed in patients responding to therapy, as changes of at least 25% are of interest.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alberto Colombo
- Division of Radiology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy; (G.S.); (F.Z.); (P.P.); (P.E.S.); (M.B.)
- Correspondence:
| | - Giulia Saia
- Division of Radiology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy; (G.S.); (F.Z.); (P.P.); (P.E.S.); (M.B.)
| | - Alcide A. Azzena
- Postgraduate School in Radiodiagnostics, University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy;
| | - Alice Rossi
- Radiology Unit, Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori (IRST) IRCCS, 47014 Meldola, Italy;
| | - Fabio Zugni
- Division of Radiology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy; (G.S.); (F.Z.); (P.P.); (P.E.S.); (M.B.)
| | - Paola Pricolo
- Division of Radiology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy; (G.S.); (F.Z.); (P.P.); (P.E.S.); (M.B.)
| | - Paul E. Summers
- Division of Radiology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy; (G.S.); (F.Z.); (P.P.); (P.E.S.); (M.B.)
| | - Giulia Marvaso
- Division of Radiotherapy, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy; (G.M.); (B.A.J.-F.)
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy;
| | - Robert Grimm
- MR Applications Pre-Development, Siemens Healthcare, 91052 Erlangen, Germany;
| | - Massimo Bellomi
- Division of Radiology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy; (G.S.); (F.Z.); (P.P.); (P.E.S.); (M.B.)
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy;
| | - Barbara A. Jereczek-Fossa
- Division of Radiotherapy, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy; (G.M.); (B.A.J.-F.)
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy;
| | - Anwar R. Padhani
- Paul Strickland Scanner Centre, Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Northwood HA6 2RN, UK;
| | - Giuseppe Petralia
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy;
- Precision Imaging and Research Unit, Department of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Summers P, Saia G, Colombo A, Pricolo P, Zugni F, Alessi S, Marvaso G, Jereczek-Fossa BA, Bellomi M, Petralia G. Whole-body magnetic resonance imaging: technique, guidelines and key applications. Ecancermedicalscience 2021; 15:1164. [PMID: 33680078 PMCID: PMC7929776 DOI: 10.3332/ecancer.2021.1164] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Whole-body magnetic resonance imaging (WB-MRI) is an imaging method without ionising radiation that can provide WB coverage with a core protocol of essential imaging contrasts in less than 40 minutes, and it can be complemented with sequences to evaluate specific body regions as needed. In many cases, WB-MRI surpasses bone scintigraphy and computed tomography in detecting and characterising lesions, evaluating their response to therapy and in screening of high-risk patients. Consequently, international guidelines now recommend the use of WB-MRI in the management of patients with multiple myeloma, prostate cancer, melanoma and individuals with certain cancer predisposition syndromes. The use of WB-MRI is also growing for metastatic breast cancer, ovarian cancer and lymphoma as well as for cancer screening amongst the general population. In light of the increasing interest from clinicians and patients in WB-MRI as a radiation-free technique for guiding the management of cancer and for cancer screening, we review its technical basis, current international guidelines for its use and key applications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul Summers
- Division of Radiology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy
| | - Giulia Saia
- Division of Radiology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy.,Advanced Screening Centers, ASC Italia, 24060 Castelli Calepio, Bergamo, Italy
| | - Alberto Colombo
- Division of Radiology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy
| | - Paola Pricolo
- Division of Radiology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy
| | - Fabio Zugni
- Division of Radiology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy
| | - Sarah Alessi
- Division of Radiology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy
| | - Giulia Marvaso
- Division of Radiotherapy, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy.,Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy
| | - Barbara Alicja Jereczek-Fossa
- Division of Radiotherapy, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy.,Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy
| | - Massimo Bellomi
- Division of Radiology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy.,Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Petralia
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy.,Precision Imaging and Research Unit, Department of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Tunariu N, Blackledge M, Messiou C, Petralia G, Padhani A, Curcean S, Curcean A, Koh DM. What's New for Clinical Whole-body MRI (WB-MRI) in the 21st Century. Br J Radiol 2020; 93:20200562. [PMID: 32822545 PMCID: PMC8519652 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20200562] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/14/2020] [Revised: 08/06/2020] [Accepted: 08/07/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Whole-body MRI (WB-MRI) has evolved since its first introduction in the 1970s as an imaging technique to detect and survey disease across multiple sites and organ systems in the body. The development of diffusion-weighted MRI (DWI) has added a new dimension to the implementation of WB-MRI on modern scanners, offering excellent lesion-to-background contrast, while achieving acceptable spatial resolution to detect focal lesions 5 to 10 mm in size. MRI hardware and software advances have reduced acquisition times, with studies taking 40-50 min to complete.The rising awareness of medical radiation exposure coupled with the advantages of MRI has resulted in increased utilization of WB-MRI in oncology, paediatrics, rheumatological and musculoskeletal conditions and more recently in population screening. There is recognition that WB-MRI can be used to track disease evolution and monitor response heterogeneity in patients with cancer. There are also opportunities to combine WB-MRI with molecular imaging on PET-MRI systems to harness the strengths of hybrid imaging. The advent of artificial intelligence and machine learning will shorten image acquisition times and image analyses, making the technique more competitive against other imaging technologies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Matthew Blackledge
- Department of Radiotherapy, The Institute of Cancer Research, 15 Cotswold Road, Sutton, London, UK
| | - Christina Messiou
- Department of Radiology, Royal Marsden Hospital, Downs Road, Sutton, London, UK
| | - Giuseppe Petralia
- Department of Radiology, European Institute of Oncology, Via Ripamonti, 435 - 20141 Milan, Italy
| | - Anwar Padhani
- Mount Vernon Hospital, The Paul Strickland Scanner Centre, Rickmansworth Road, Northwood, Middlesex, UK
| | - Sebastian Curcean
- Department of Radiology, Royal Marsden Hospital, Downs Road, Sutton, London, UK
| | | | - Dow-Mu Koh
- Drug Development Unit, The Institute of Cancer Research, 15 Cotswold Road, Sutton, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Kosmin M, Padhani AR, Gogbashian A, Woolf D, Ah-See ML, Ostler P, Sutherland S, Miles D, Noble J, Koh DM, Marshall A, Dunn J, Makris A. Comparison of Whole-Body MRI, CT, and Bone Scintigraphy for Response Evaluation of Cancer Therapeutics in Metastatic Breast Cancer to Bone. Radiology 2020; 297:622-629. [PMID: 33078998 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2020192683] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Background CT and bone scintigraphy have limitations in evaluating systemic anticancer therapy (SACT) response in bone metastases from metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Purpose To evaluate whether whole-body MRI enables identification of progressive disease (PD) earlier than CT and bone scintigraphy in bone-only MBC. Materials and Methods This prospective study evaluated participants with bone-only MBC between May 2016 and January 2019 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03266744). Participants were enrolled at initiation of first or subsequent SACT based on standard CT and bone scintigraphy imaging. Baseline whole-body MRI was performed within 2 weeks of entry; those with extraosseous disease were excluded. CT and whole-body MRI were performed every 12 weeks until definitive PD was evident with one or both modalities. In case of PD, bone scintigraphy was used to assess for bone disease progression. Radiologists independently interpreted images from CT, whole-body MRI, or bone scintigraphy and were blinded to results with the other modalities. Systematic differences in performance between modalities were analyzed by using the McNemar test. Results Forty-five participants (mean age, 60 years ± 13 [standard deviation]; all women) were evaluated. Median time on study was 36 weeks (range, 1-120 weeks). Two participants were excluded because of unequivocal evidence of liver metastases at baseline whole-body MRI, two participants were excluded because they had clinical progression before imaging showed PD, and one participant was lost to follow-up. Of the 33 participants with PD at imaging, 67% (22 participants) had PD evident at whole-body MRI only and 33% (11 participants) had PD at CT and whole-body MRI concurrently; none had PD at CT only (P < .001, McNemar test). There was only slight agreement between whole-body MRI and CT (Cohen κ, 0.15). PD at bone scintigraphy was reported in 50% of participants (13 of 26) with bone progression at CT and/or whole-body MRI (P < .001, McNemar test). Conclusion Whole-body MRI enabled identification of progressive disease before CT in most participants with bone-only metastatic breast cancer. Progressive disease at bone scintigraphy was evident in only half of participants with bone progression at whole-body MRI. © RSNA, 2020 Online supplemental material is available for this article.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Kosmin
- From the Department of Oncology, University College London NHS Foundation Trust, 250 Euston Road, London NW1 2PG, England (M.K.); Paul Strickland Scanner Centre (A.R.P., A.G.) and Breast Cancer Research Unit (P.O., S.S., D.M., A. Makris), Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Northwood, Middlesex, England; Department of Clinical Oncology, the Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, England (D.W.); Astra Zeneca UK Limited, Cambridge, England (M.L.A.); the Royal Marsden Hospital, Sutton, Surrey, England (J.N., D.M.K.); and Warwick Clinical Trials Unit, University of Warwick, Coventry, England (A. Marshall, J.D.)
| | - Anwar R Padhani
- From the Department of Oncology, University College London NHS Foundation Trust, 250 Euston Road, London NW1 2PG, England (M.K.); Paul Strickland Scanner Centre (A.R.P., A.G.) and Breast Cancer Research Unit (P.O., S.S., D.M., A. Makris), Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Northwood, Middlesex, England; Department of Clinical Oncology, the Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, England (D.W.); Astra Zeneca UK Limited, Cambridge, England (M.L.A.); the Royal Marsden Hospital, Sutton, Surrey, England (J.N., D.M.K.); and Warwick Clinical Trials Unit, University of Warwick, Coventry, England (A. Marshall, J.D.)
| | - Andrew Gogbashian
- From the Department of Oncology, University College London NHS Foundation Trust, 250 Euston Road, London NW1 2PG, England (M.K.); Paul Strickland Scanner Centre (A.R.P., A.G.) and Breast Cancer Research Unit (P.O., S.S., D.M., A. Makris), Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Northwood, Middlesex, England; Department of Clinical Oncology, the Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, England (D.W.); Astra Zeneca UK Limited, Cambridge, England (M.L.A.); the Royal Marsden Hospital, Sutton, Surrey, England (J.N., D.M.K.); and Warwick Clinical Trials Unit, University of Warwick, Coventry, England (A. Marshall, J.D.)
| | - David Woolf
- From the Department of Oncology, University College London NHS Foundation Trust, 250 Euston Road, London NW1 2PG, England (M.K.); Paul Strickland Scanner Centre (A.R.P., A.G.) and Breast Cancer Research Unit (P.O., S.S., D.M., A. Makris), Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Northwood, Middlesex, England; Department of Clinical Oncology, the Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, England (D.W.); Astra Zeneca UK Limited, Cambridge, England (M.L.A.); the Royal Marsden Hospital, Sutton, Surrey, England (J.N., D.M.K.); and Warwick Clinical Trials Unit, University of Warwick, Coventry, England (A. Marshall, J.D.)
| | - Mei-Lin Ah-See
- From the Department of Oncology, University College London NHS Foundation Trust, 250 Euston Road, London NW1 2PG, England (M.K.); Paul Strickland Scanner Centre (A.R.P., A.G.) and Breast Cancer Research Unit (P.O., S.S., D.M., A. Makris), Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Northwood, Middlesex, England; Department of Clinical Oncology, the Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, England (D.W.); Astra Zeneca UK Limited, Cambridge, England (M.L.A.); the Royal Marsden Hospital, Sutton, Surrey, England (J.N., D.M.K.); and Warwick Clinical Trials Unit, University of Warwick, Coventry, England (A. Marshall, J.D.)
| | - Peter Ostler
- From the Department of Oncology, University College London NHS Foundation Trust, 250 Euston Road, London NW1 2PG, England (M.K.); Paul Strickland Scanner Centre (A.R.P., A.G.) and Breast Cancer Research Unit (P.O., S.S., D.M., A. Makris), Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Northwood, Middlesex, England; Department of Clinical Oncology, the Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, England (D.W.); Astra Zeneca UK Limited, Cambridge, England (M.L.A.); the Royal Marsden Hospital, Sutton, Surrey, England (J.N., D.M.K.); and Warwick Clinical Trials Unit, University of Warwick, Coventry, England (A. Marshall, J.D.)
| | - Stephanie Sutherland
- From the Department of Oncology, University College London NHS Foundation Trust, 250 Euston Road, London NW1 2PG, England (M.K.); Paul Strickland Scanner Centre (A.R.P., A.G.) and Breast Cancer Research Unit (P.O., S.S., D.M., A. Makris), Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Northwood, Middlesex, England; Department of Clinical Oncology, the Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, England (D.W.); Astra Zeneca UK Limited, Cambridge, England (M.L.A.); the Royal Marsden Hospital, Sutton, Surrey, England (J.N., D.M.K.); and Warwick Clinical Trials Unit, University of Warwick, Coventry, England (A. Marshall, J.D.)
| | - David Miles
- From the Department of Oncology, University College London NHS Foundation Trust, 250 Euston Road, London NW1 2PG, England (M.K.); Paul Strickland Scanner Centre (A.R.P., A.G.) and Breast Cancer Research Unit (P.O., S.S., D.M., A. Makris), Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Northwood, Middlesex, England; Department of Clinical Oncology, the Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, England (D.W.); Astra Zeneca UK Limited, Cambridge, England (M.L.A.); the Royal Marsden Hospital, Sutton, Surrey, England (J.N., D.M.K.); and Warwick Clinical Trials Unit, University of Warwick, Coventry, England (A. Marshall, J.D.)
| | - Jillian Noble
- From the Department of Oncology, University College London NHS Foundation Trust, 250 Euston Road, London NW1 2PG, England (M.K.); Paul Strickland Scanner Centre (A.R.P., A.G.) and Breast Cancer Research Unit (P.O., S.S., D.M., A. Makris), Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Northwood, Middlesex, England; Department of Clinical Oncology, the Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, England (D.W.); Astra Zeneca UK Limited, Cambridge, England (M.L.A.); the Royal Marsden Hospital, Sutton, Surrey, England (J.N., D.M.K.); and Warwick Clinical Trials Unit, University of Warwick, Coventry, England (A. Marshall, J.D.)
| | - Dow-Mu Koh
- From the Department of Oncology, University College London NHS Foundation Trust, 250 Euston Road, London NW1 2PG, England (M.K.); Paul Strickland Scanner Centre (A.R.P., A.G.) and Breast Cancer Research Unit (P.O., S.S., D.M., A. Makris), Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Northwood, Middlesex, England; Department of Clinical Oncology, the Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, England (D.W.); Astra Zeneca UK Limited, Cambridge, England (M.L.A.); the Royal Marsden Hospital, Sutton, Surrey, England (J.N., D.M.K.); and Warwick Clinical Trials Unit, University of Warwick, Coventry, England (A. Marshall, J.D.)
| | - Andrea Marshall
- From the Department of Oncology, University College London NHS Foundation Trust, 250 Euston Road, London NW1 2PG, England (M.K.); Paul Strickland Scanner Centre (A.R.P., A.G.) and Breast Cancer Research Unit (P.O., S.S., D.M., A. Makris), Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Northwood, Middlesex, England; Department of Clinical Oncology, the Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, England (D.W.); Astra Zeneca UK Limited, Cambridge, England (M.L.A.); the Royal Marsden Hospital, Sutton, Surrey, England (J.N., D.M.K.); and Warwick Clinical Trials Unit, University of Warwick, Coventry, England (A. Marshall, J.D.)
| | - Janet Dunn
- From the Department of Oncology, University College London NHS Foundation Trust, 250 Euston Road, London NW1 2PG, England (M.K.); Paul Strickland Scanner Centre (A.R.P., A.G.) and Breast Cancer Research Unit (P.O., S.S., D.M., A. Makris), Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Northwood, Middlesex, England; Department of Clinical Oncology, the Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, England (D.W.); Astra Zeneca UK Limited, Cambridge, England (M.L.A.); the Royal Marsden Hospital, Sutton, Surrey, England (J.N., D.M.K.); and Warwick Clinical Trials Unit, University of Warwick, Coventry, England (A. Marshall, J.D.)
| | - Andreas Makris
- From the Department of Oncology, University College London NHS Foundation Trust, 250 Euston Road, London NW1 2PG, England (M.K.); Paul Strickland Scanner Centre (A.R.P., A.G.) and Breast Cancer Research Unit (P.O., S.S., D.M., A. Makris), Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Northwood, Middlesex, England; Department of Clinical Oncology, the Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, England (D.W.); Astra Zeneca UK Limited, Cambridge, England (M.L.A.); the Royal Marsden Hospital, Sutton, Surrey, England (J.N., D.M.K.); and Warwick Clinical Trials Unit, University of Warwick, Coventry, England (A. Marshall, J.D.)
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Zugni F, Padhani AR, Koh DM, Summers PE, Bellomi M, Petralia G. Whole-body magnetic resonance imaging (WB-MRI) for cancer screening in asymptomatic subjects of the general population: review and recommendations. Cancer Imaging 2020; 20:34. [PMID: 32393345 PMCID: PMC7216394 DOI: 10.1186/s40644-020-00315-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/26/2020] [Accepted: 05/03/2020] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The number of studies describing the use of whole-body magnetic resonance imaging (WB-MRI) for screening of malignant tumours in asymptomatic subjects is increasing. Our aim is to review the methodologies used and the results of the published studies on per patient and per lesion analysis, and to provide recommendations on the use of WB-MRI for cancer screening. Main body We identified 12 studies, encompassing 6214 WB-MRI examinations, which provided the rates of abnormal findings and findings suspicious for cancer in asymptomatic subjects, from the general population. Eleven of 12 studies provided imaging protocols that included T1- and T2-weighted sequences, while only five included diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) of the whole body. Different categorical systems were used for the classification and the management of abnormal findings. Of 17,961 abnormal findings reported, 91% were benign, while 9% were oncologically relevant, requiring further investigations, and 0.5% of lesions were suspicious for cancer. A per-subject analysis showed that just 5% of subjects had no abnormal findings, while 95% had abnormal findings. Findings requiring further investigation were reported in 30% of all subjects, though in only 1.8% cancer was suspected. The overall rate of histologically confirmed cancer was 1.1%. Conclusion WB-MRI studies of cancer screening in the asymptomatic general population are too heterogeneous to draw impactful conclusions regarding efficacy. A 5-point lesion scale based on the oncological relevance of findings appears the most appropriate for risk-based management stratification. WB-MRI examinations should be reported by experienced oncological radiologists versed on WB-MRI reading abnormalities and on onward referral pathways.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fabio Zugni
- Division of Radiology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Via Giuseppe Ripamonti 435, 20141, Milan, Italy.
| | - Anwar Roshanali Padhani
- Paul Strickland Scanner Centre, Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Rickmansworth Rd, Northwood, HA6 2RN, UK
| | - Dow-Mu Koh
- Department of Radiology, The Royal Marsden Hospital (Surrey), Downs Rd, Sutton, SM2 5PT, UK
| | - Paul Eugene Summers
- Division of Radiology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Via Giuseppe Ripamonti 435, 20141, Milan, Italy
| | - Massimo Bellomi
- Division of Radiology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Via Giuseppe Ripamonti 435, 20141, Milan, Italy.,Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Via S. Sofia, 9/1, 20122, Milan, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Petralia
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Via S. Sofia, 9/1, 20122, Milan, Italy.,Precision Imaging and Research Unit, Department of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Via Giuseppe Ripamonti 435, 20141, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Petralia G, Padhani AR, Pricolo P, Zugni F, Martinetti M, Summers PE, Grazioli L, Colagrande S, Giovagnoni A, Bellomi M. Whole-body magnetic resonance imaging (WB-MRI) in oncology: recommendations and key uses. Radiol Med 2018; 124:218-233. [PMID: 30430385 DOI: 10.1007/s11547-018-0955-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2018] [Accepted: 10/23/2018] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
The past decade has witnessed a growing role and increasing use of whole-body magnetic resonance imaging (WB-MRI). Driving these successes are developments in both hardware and software that have reduced overall examination times and significantly improved MR imaging quality. In addition, radiologists and clinicians have continued to find promising new applications of this innovative imaging technique that brings together morphologic and functional characterization of tissues. In oncology, the role of WB-MRI has expanded to the point of being recommended in international guidelines for the assessment of several cancer histotypes (multiple myeloma, melanoma, prostate cancer) and cancer-prone syndromes (Li-Fraumeni and hereditary paraganglioma-pheochromocytoma syndromes). The literature shows growing use of WB-MRI for the staging and follow-up of other cancer histotypes and cancer-related syndromes (including breast cancer, lymphoma, neurofibromatosis, and von Hippel-Lindau syndromes). The main aim of this review is to examine the current scientific evidence for the use of WB-MRI in oncology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giuseppe Petralia
- Department of Radiology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy.,Department of Oncology and Hematology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.,Advanced Screening Centers - ASC Italia, Castelli Calepio, Bergamo, Italy
| | - Anwar R Padhani
- Paul Strickland Scanner Centre, Mount Vernon Hospital, Northwood, UK
| | - Paola Pricolo
- Department of Radiology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Fabio Zugni
- Postgraduate School in Radiodiagnostics, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Marco Martinetti
- Advanced Screening Centers - ASC Italia, Castelli Calepio, Bergamo, Italy
| | - Paul E Summers
- Department of Radiology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
| | - Luigi Grazioli
- First Department of Radiology, Civic and University Hospital of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - Stefano Colagrande
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences, Radiodiagnostic Unit n. 2, University of Florence - Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy
| | - Andrea Giovagnoni
- Department of Radiology, Ospedali Riuniti, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona, Italy
| | - Massimo Bellomi
- Department of Radiology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy.,Department of Oncology and Hematology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.,Advanced Screening Centers - ASC Italia, Castelli Calepio, Bergamo, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|