Axon numbers and landmarks of trigeminal donor nerves for corneal neurotization

[Reconstruction and Reanimation of the Periorbital Region in Facial Paralysis]

Reconstruction of facial paralysis requires the restoration of both functional and aesthetic aspects while considering a satisfactory quality of life. The periorbital region in particular poses major challenges. The main symptoms of the periorbital region include increased tearing, lagophthalmos, recurrent keratoconjunctivitis, asymmetry and inability to blink spontaneously. Diagnostics as well as therapy must be carried out in an interdisciplinary setting. Conservative treatment is initiated immediately after occurrence of symptoms. The indication for surgical therapy depends on the etiology, severity and regenerative capacity of the paresis. If there are no signs of improvement, the function of the facial nerve can be restored surgically. Surgical reconstruction options include dynamic and static procedures. While the goal of static treatment is to protect the cornea and improve symmetry, dynamic procedures also aim to restore spontaneous motor skills and facial expressions. This article summarizes the range and timing of treatment options for the periorbital region.

Corneal Neurotization for Neurotrophic Keratopathy: A Multicenter Experience

PURPOSE

Corneal neurotization is an emerging technique that offers potential for visual rehabilitation in neurotrophic keratopathy. This study reports on a multicenter experience and outcomes for both direct and indirect methods of corneal neurotization.

METHODS

Retrospective case series. Sixteen patients with neurotrophic keratopathy who underwent corneal neurotization across 5 centers in Australia and Israel were identified for inclusion. Corneal neurotization was performed via direct neurotization from the ipsilateral or contralateral supraorbital/supratrochlear nerve or by the use of an interpositional sural nerve graft. Change in corneal sensitivity (measured in millimeters by the Cochet-Bonnet aesthesiometer), visual acuity, and corneal health.

RESULTS

Over a mean follow-up period of 31.3 months (range: 3 months-8 years), mean corneal sensitivity improved from 3.6 mm (range: 0-25 mm) to 25.3 mm (range: 0-57 mm). Visual acuity improved on average from 20/380 to 20/260. Twelve of 16 patients (75.0%) improved in at least 2 out of the 3 main outcome measures. Nine patients (56.3%) showed an improvement in visual acuity; 13 (81.3%) showed an improvement in average corneal sensitivity; and 11 (68.8%) showed an improvement in corneal health. There were no intraoperative or postoperative complications.

CONCLUSIONS

Corneal neurotization is an emerging surgical treatment option for the management of neurotrophic keratopathy. With appropriate case selection, outcomes are favorable and complication rates are low, for a condition that is otherwise challenging to manage. Patients with severe neurotrophic keratopathy should be considered for this surgical treatment option.

Current perspectives and concerns in corneal neurotization

This study aimed to comprehensively explore the intricacies of corneal neurotization (CN) and the nuanced factors that set it apart from routine clinical practice, exerting a substantial influence on its success. A symbiotic relationship is evident between corneal innervation and ocular surface health. The loss of corneal innervation results in a potentially challenging corneal condition known as neurotrophic keratopathy (NK). The majority of treatments are primarily focused on preventing epithelial breakdown rather than addressing the underlying pathogenesis. Consequently, to address the impaired corneal sensation (underlying etiology), a novel surgical approach has emerged, namely CN, which involves transferring healthy sensory nerve axons to the affected cornea. This review offers valuable insights into the existing body of supporting evidence for CN, meticulously examining clinical studies, case reports, and experimental findings. The aim is to enhance our understanding of the effectiveness and potential outcomes associated with this innovative surgical technique. The exploration of innovative therapeutic avenues holds promise for revolutionizing the management of NK, offering a potentially permanent solution to a condition once deemed incurable and severely debilitating.

The Ansa Hypoglossi: Quantifying Axonal Density of a Donor Nerve for Facial Reinnervation

Background: There are a number of nerve grafting options for facial reanimation and the ansa hypoglossi (AH) may be considered in select situations. Objective: To compare axonal density, area, and diameter of AH with other nerves more usually used for facial reanimation. Methods: AH specimens from patients undergoing neck dissections were submitted in formalin. Proximal to distal cross sections, nerve diameters, and the number of axons per nerve, proximally and distally, were measured and counted. Results: Eighteen nerve specimens were analyzed. The average manual axon count for the distal and proximal nerve sections was 1378 ± 333 and 1506 ± 306, respectively. The average QuPath counts for the proximal and distal nerve sections were 1381 ± 325 and 1470 ± 334, respectively. The mean nerve area of the proximal and distal nerve sections was 0.206 ± 0.01 and 0.22 ± 0.064 mm2, respectively. The mean nerve diameter for the proximal and distal nerve sections were 0.498 ± 0.121 and 0.526 ± 0.75 mm, respectively. Conclusion: The histological characteristics of the AH support clinical examination of outcomes as a promising option in facial reanimation.

Histomorphometry of the Sural Nerve for Use as a CFNG in Facial Reanimation Procedures

Facial palsy (FP) is a debilitating nerve pathology. Cross Face Nerve Grafting (CFNG) describes a surgical technique that uses nerve grafts to reanimate the paralyzed face. The sural nerve has been shown to be a reliable nerve graft with little donor side morbidity. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the microanatomy of the sural nerve. Biopsies were obtained from 15 FP patients who underwent CFNG using sural nerve grafts. Histological cross-sections were fixated, stained with PPD, and digitized. Histomorphometry and a validated software-based axon quantification were conducted. The median age of the operated patients was 37 years (5-62 years). There was a significant difference in axonal capacity decrease towards the periphery when comparing proximal vs. distal biopsies (p = 0.047), while the side of nerve harvest showed no significant differences in nerve caliber (proximal p = 0.253, distal p = 0.506) and axonal capacity for proximal and distal biopsies (proximal p = 0.414, distal p = 0.922). Age did not correlate with axonal capacity (proximal: R = -0.201, p = 0.603; distal: R = 0.317, p = 0.292). These novel insights into the microanatomy of the sural nerve may help refine CFNG techniques and individualize FP patient treatment plans, ultimately improving overall patient outcomes.

Corneal Neurotization—Indications, Surgical Techniques and Outcomes

Corneal neurotization is a promising surgical approach for the treatment of moderate to severe neurotrophic keratopathy. This technique aims to restore corneal sensation by transferring healthy nerves, either directly or via a conduit, to the anesthetic cornea. This review provides a report on the current state of development, evidence, and experience in the field. We summarize the data available from clinical reports and case series, placing an emphasis on the diversity of the surgical techniques reported. While these data are encouraging, they also highlight the need for a consensus in reporting outcomes and highlight how the next step will involve validating putative outcome parameters when researching and reporting corneal neurotization surgery.

[Treatment of neurotrophic keratopathy in combined lesions of the trigeminal and facial nerves]

Ocular symptomatology in lesions of the facial nerve is associated with disturbed innervation of the circular muscle of the eye that leads to disruption of the protective function of the eyelids and the development of exposure symptoms, and is accompanied by a breach in corneal tear film integrity. The main clinical manifestation of the trigeminal nerve damage is the loss of sensory innervation of the cornea and disruption of the supply of neurotransmitters to its cells, manifesting as corneal hypo- or anesthesia. This triggers a cascade of pathological processes that lead to the development of neurotrophic keratopathy. In combined pathology of the facial and trigeminal nerves, a number of interrelated and mutually aggravating problems arise that require correction of lagophthalmos and functional restoration of the trigeminal nerve, since there is an interaction between the corneal epithelium and trigeminal neurons through trophic neuromodulators, which normally contribute to the proliferation of epithelial cells, their differentiation, migration and adhesion, and are essential for vital functions, metabolism and healing of surface lesions of the eye. Classical methods of treating neurotrophic keratopathy aim to protect the ocular surface, and are palliative or auxiliary, do not provide radical relief of the symptoms of neurotrophic keratopathy. Modern surgical technique of neurotization of the cornea allows restoring the structural growth of the nerve, which provides nerve trophism and corneal sensitivity, and is the only pathogenetically substantiated method of effective treatment of neurotrophic keratopathy. At the same time, direct neurotization has undeniable advantages over methods involving intercalary donor nerves, since neuropeptides from nerve fibers are immediately released into the recipient tissue and start reparative processes. Taking into account the accumulated positive experience of neurotization surgeries, scientific and clinical research should be continued in order to improve the most effective methods of corneal neurotization and promote their wider implementation into clinical practice.

Clinical and Morphologic Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Direct Corneal Neurotization

PURPOSE

To describe clinical outcomes of a minimally invasive technique for direct corneal neurotization to treat neurotrophic keratopathy.

METHODS

All cases of corneal neurotization for neurotrophic keratopathy performed by a single surgeon using minimally invasive direct corneal neurotization were reviewed. The supraorbital donor nerve was directly transferred to the cornea through an upper eyelid crease incision using either a combination of endoscopic and direct visualization or direct visualization alone. Detailed ocular and adnexal examinations as well as Cochet-Bonnet esthesiometry of the affected cornea were performed. Corneal histopathology and in vivo confocal microscopy after minimally invasive direct corneal neurotization were reviewed in one patient who underwent simultaneous penetrating keratoplasty.

RESULTS

Five consecutive cases in 4 patients were included, with a mean follow up of 15.8 months (range: 11-23 months). Average denervation time was 17.8 months (range: 6-24 months). Baseline corneal conditions were Mackie stage 1 (20%), Mackie stage 2 (40%), and Mackie stage 3 (40%). All patients demonstrated improvements in corneal sensibility and appearance postoperatively. All patients demonstrated stable or improved visual acuity. No patients developed persistent epithelial defects postoperatively, and all achieved return of tactile skin sensation in the donor nerve sensory distribution. In vivo confocal microscopy after minimally invasive direct corneal neurotization and simultaneous penetrating keratoplasty demonstrated regeneration of corneal nerves. Complications included an asymptomatic small bony excrescence lateral to the supraorbital notch in one patient and cataract progression in the patient who underwent penetrating keratoplasty.

CONCLUSIONS

Minimally invasive direct corneal neurotization is a safe and effective treatment of neurotrophic keratopathy.

Corneal Neurotization for Postherpetic Neurotrophic Keratopathy: Initial Experience and Clinical Outcomes

PURPOSE

To assess early outcomes of corneal neurotization for postherpetic neurotrophic keratopathy (NK).

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of patients who underwent corneal neurotization for postherpetic NK by a single experienced oculoplastic surgeon was performed. Collected data included stage and etiology of NK as well as comorbidities, prior treatment history, neurotization technique, donor nerve site, preoperative and postoperative examination findings (i.e., ocular surface quality, corneal clarity, corneal sensation by Cochet-Bonnet esthesiometry, and visual acuity [VA]), and follow-up duration. Differences between preoperative and postoperative values were analyzed by Wilcoxon signed-rank test.

RESULTS

Of 23 adult patients who underwent corneal neurotization, 3 (13%) had history of herpes simplex keratitis and/or endotheliitis, and 4 (17%) had history of herpes zoster ophthalmicus. One patient with herpes zoster ophthalmicus was excluded due to inadequate follow-up duration. Of the 6 patients included in the study, 3 (50%) had Mackie stage 1 disease, 1 (17%) had stage 2, and 2 (33%) had stage 3 with impending perforation, but all had markedly diminished corneal sensation, with a median denervation time of 11.8 months (interquartile range [IQR] 9.4-29.2 months). Following neurotization, median corneal sensation improved significantly from 1.6 cm (interquartile range 0.0-1.9 cm) to 3.6 cm (IQR 3.0-5.6 cm, p = 0.028), with 1 patient achieving full sensation by postoperative month 5. All patients with a persistent epithelial defect preoperatively showed complete corneal healing by their last follow-up visit. VA also improved postoperatively in all patients (p = 0.028). Median follow-up duration was 11.3 months (interquartile range 9.6-17.9 months).

CONCLUSIONS

Corneal neurotization can successfully reinnervate corneas previously devitalized by herpetic disease and halt the progressive nature of postherpetic NK. If utilized appropriately and early in the disease process, neurotization may reduce morbidity and maximize visual potential in postherpetic NK.

Corneal neurotization

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Neurotrophic keratopathy is a devastating corneal condition that can lead to ocular morbidity and blindness. Current medical and surgical treatments poorly tackle the essential problem of corneal aesthesia and hence fail to provide a permanent cure. Recent advances in corneal neurotization techniques have shown promise to restore corneal nerves in neurotrophic keratopathy. This article aims at reviewing the current surgical advances, along with the current thoughts and evidence available for corneal nerve regeneration.

RECENT FINDINGS

Corneal neurotization was first introduced in 2009 by Terzis et al., but recently picked up more interest since 2014. Direct and indirect neurotization are being developed, and different nerves (sural nerve, great auricular nerve) have been explored for interposition between frontal nerve branches and the cornea. New endoscopic techniques are introduced for less invasive approaches. On the corneal front, confocal microscopy and esthesiometry studies have established that the regeneration of the corneal nerves is happening 6 months after the procedure.

SUMMARY

Neurotization is a budding revolutionary technique that shows promise of cure for neurotrophic corneas, but at this stage, it is still reasonably invasive and still reserved for selected patients.