1
|
Schnabel A, Carstensen VA, Lohmöller K, Vilz TO, Willis MA, Weibel S, Freys SM, Pogatzki-Zahn EM. Perioperative pain management with regional analgesia techniques for visceral cancer surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Anesth 2024; 95:111438. [PMID: 38484505 DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2024.111438] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/14/2023] [Revised: 01/25/2024] [Accepted: 03/01/2024] [Indexed: 04/29/2024]
Abstract
STUDY OBJECTIVE Regional analgesia following visceral cancer surgery might provide an advantage but evidence for best treatment options related to risk-benefit is unclear. DESIGN Systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCT) with meta-analysis and GRADE assessment. SETTING Postoperative pain treatment. PATIENTS Adult patients undergoing visceral cancer surgery. INTERVENTIONS Any kind of peripheral (PRA) or epidural analgesia (EA) with/without systemic analgesia (SA) was compared to SA with or without placebo treatment or any other regional anaesthetic techniques. MEASUREMENTS Primary outcome measures were postoperative acute pain intensity at rest and during activity 24 h after surgery, the number of patients with block-related adverse events and postoperative paralytic ileus. MAIN RESULTS 59 RCTs (4345 participants) were included. EA may reduce pain intensity at rest (mean difference (MD) -1.05; 95% confidence interval (CI): -1.35 to -0.75, low certainty evidence) and during activity 24 h after surgery (MD -1.83; 95% CI: -2.34 to -1.33, very low certainty evidence). PRA likely results in little difference in pain intensity at rest (MD -0.75; 95% CI: -1.20 to -0.31, moderate certainty evidence) and pain during activity (MD -0.93; 95% CI: -1.34 to -0.53, moderate certainty evidence) 24 h after surgery compared to SA. There may be no difference in block-related adverse events (very low certainty evidence) and development of paralytic ileus (very low certainty of evidence) between EA, respectively PRA and SA. CONCLUSIONS Following visceral cancer surgery EA may reduce pain intensity. In contrast, PRA had only limited effects on pain intensity at rest and during activity. However, we are uncertain regarding the effect of both techniques on block-related adverse events and paralytic ileus. Further research is required focusing on regional analgesia techniques especially following laparoscopic visceral cancer surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander Schnabel
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care and Pain Medicine, University Hospital of Muenster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, Muenster, Germany
| | - Vivian A Carstensen
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care and Pain Medicine, University Hospital of Muenster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, Muenster, Germany
| | - Katharina Lohmöller
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care and Pain Medicine, University Hospital of Muenster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, Muenster, Germany
| | - Tim O Vilz
- Department of General, Visceral, Thorax and Vascular Surgery, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Maria A Willis
- Department of General, Visceral, Thorax and Vascular Surgery, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Stephanie Weibel
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care, Emergency and Pain Medicine, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Stephan M Freys
- Department of Surgery, DIAKO Ev. Diakonie-Krankenhaus Bremen, Bremen, Germany
| | - Esther M Pogatzki-Zahn
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care and Pain Medicine, University Hospital of Muenster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, Muenster, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Osuchukwu O, Gagnon J, Richard J, Craig W, Quaye A. Liposomal bupivacaine in transversus abdominis plane blocks for lower abdominal surgery. Pain Pract 2024; 24:717-723. [PMID: 38265273 PMCID: PMC11178472 DOI: 10.1111/papr.13347] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/25/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Transversus abdominis plane blocks are an established method of postoperative analgesia for abdominopelvic surgeries. Liposomal bupivacaine is an extended-release formulation of bupivacaine providing up to 72 h of analgesia. This study aims to determine if transversus abdominis plane blocks performed with liposomal bupivacaine are associated with reduced opioid consumption and level of pain intensity compared to conventional bupivacaine in patients undergoing lower abdominal surgery. METHODS This retrospective cohort study was conducted at a single institution between December 2020 and December 2021. After institutional review board approval, we identified patients who underwent lower abdominopelvic surgery with transversus abdominis plane blocks done with liposomal or conventional bupivacaine and collected demographic, clinical, and procedural information for analysis. We compared total opioid consumption over 72-h postoperatively in milligram morphine equivalents (MME), frequency of opioid utilization, and average level of pain intensity between groups. These outcomes were also evaluated after adjusting for covariates. Data were presented as mean ± SD, median [IQR] or frequency (%), as appropriate; p < 0.05 was accepted as significant. RESULTS A total of 178 patients met inclusion criteria, with 79 patients receiving an admixture of liposomal bupivacaine and conventional bupivacaine and 99 patients receiving conventional bupivacaine. The liposomal bupivacaine group had a median opioid consumption 72-h postoperatively of 47.5 [18-91.8] MME compared to 88 [43.8-160] MME in the conventional bupivacaine group, p = 0.045. Differences in opioid consumption between the groups did not reach statistical significance after adjustment for demographic and clinical characteristics, p = 0.11. There was no significant difference in frequency of opioid use or average pain intensity. CONCLUSION Transversus abdominis plane blocks using an admixture of liposomal bupivacaine conventional bupivacaine are not associated with decreased opioid consumption or reduced pain up to 72 h following elective abdominopelvic surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Obiyo Osuchukwu
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Maine Medical Center, 22 Bramhall St, Portland, ME, 04102, United States
| | - James Gagnon
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Maine Medical Center, 22 Bramhall St, Portland, ME, 04102, United States
- Spectrum Healthcare Partners, 324 Gannett Drive, Suite 200, South Portland, ME 04106, United States
| | - Janelle Richard
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Maine Medical Center, 22 Bramhall St, Portland, ME, 04102, United States
| | - Wendy Craig
- MaineHealth Institute for Research, 81 Research Dr, Scarborough, ME 04074, United States
| | - Aurora Quaye
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Maine Medical Center, 22 Bramhall St, Portland, ME, 04102, United States
- Spectrum Healthcare Partners, 324 Gannett Drive, Suite 200, South Portland, ME 04106, United States
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Zhu Q, Zhang D, Wei Y. Optimal approach for ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane (TAP) blocks for abdominal surgeries: a protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open 2024; 14:e085680. [PMID: 38697764 PMCID: PMC11086374 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-085680] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/05/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Transversus abdominis plane (TAP) blocks are commonly used for postoperative analgesia after various abdominal surgeries. There are several different approaches for performing TAP blocks, mainly including posterior, lateral and subcostal approaches. An increasing number of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) have compared the analgesic effects of different TAP block approaches, but the results have not been consistent. This protocol aims to determine the optimal approach of ultrasound-guided TAP blocks for postoperative analgesia after abdominal surgery. METHODS AND ANALYSIS Four databases, including Web of Science, PubMed, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library will be systematically searched to identify RCTs that compared the analgesic effects of different ultrasound-guided TAP block approaches. The search interval will range from the inception of the databases to 30 July 2024. The postoperative opioid consumption over 24 hours will be defined as the primary outcome. The secondary outcomes will include the analgesia duration, postoperative pain scores at rest and during movement at different timepoints and the incidence of adverse effects. All the statistical analyses will be conducted using RevMan V.5.4. The quality of evidence will be evaluated by the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION Ethical approval will not be needed. The results will be submitted to one peer-reviewed journal when completed. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER CRD42024510141.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qiuyu Zhu
- Department of Anesthesiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shenzhen & Longgang District People's Hospital of Shenzhen, Shenzhen, China
| | - Donghang Zhang
- Department of Anesthesiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Yiyong Wei
- Department of Anesthesiology, Longgang District Maternity & Child Healthcare Hospital of Shenzhen City (Longgang Maternity and Child Institute of Shantou University Medical College), Shenzhen, China
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Zeng J, Hong A, Gu Z, Jian J, Liang X. Efficacy of transversus abdominis plane block on postoperative nausea and vomiting: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trial. BMC Anesthesiol 2024; 24:87. [PMID: 38429757 PMCID: PMC10905943 DOI: 10.1186/s12871-024-02469-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/04/2023] [Accepted: 02/24/2024] [Indexed: 03/03/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) is a common postoperative complication, and Transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block can provide effective analgesia for surgical operation. However, but there is not enough evidence to prove its advantage for nausea and vomiting. The objective of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the efficacy of TAP block on PONV. METHODS Two independent researchers conducted searches for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. We used Review Manager software for meta-analysis. RESULTS In this meta-analysis, twenty-six trials with 1981 patients were examined. The results showed that TAP block reduced postoperative nausea (Risk Difference (RD) = -0.10, 95% confidence interval (CI): -0.15 to -0.05) compared with no TAP block. TAP block reduced the dose of fentanyl (Standardized Mean Difference (SMD) = -1.17, 95% CI: -2.07 to -0.26) and morphine (SMD = -1.12, 95% CI: -2.10 to -0.13) compared with no TAP block, when the timing of administration was before surgery (RD = -0.13, 95% CI: -0.19 to -0.07). TAP block reduced postoperative nausea when the ropivacaine dosage is ≤ 100 mg (RD = -0.13, 95% CI: -0.21 to -0.06), bupivacaine dosage ≥ 100 mg ( RD = -0.08, 95% CI: -0.13 to -0.03), and when the ropivacaine concentration was ≤ 0.375% (RD = -0.11, 95% CI: -0.18 to -0.04). TAP block significantly reduced the incidence of nausea when the types of opioid drugs in PCA is tramadol (RD = -0.13, 95% CI: -0.24 to -0.03). TAP block could reduce the VAS (SMD= -0.99, 95% CI: -1.29 to -0.70) and reduce the time of extubation (SMD = -0.71, 95% CI: -1.34 to -0.08). CONCLUSION The meta-analysis conducted in this study revealed that TAP block could reduce the incidence of PONV, and the efficacy of TAP block may be influenced by factors such as administration time, local anesthetic dosage and concentration, types of opioid drugs in PCA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jinfang Zeng
- Department of Anesthesiology, Jiangnan University Medical Center, Affiliated Wuxi Clinical College of Nantong University, Wuxi, 214002, China.
| | - Aonan Hong
- Department of Anesthesiology, Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing, University of Chinese Medicine, Jiangsu Province Hospital of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, 210000, China
| | - Zhen Gu
- Department of Anesthesiology, Jiangnan University Medical Center, Affiliated Wuxi Clinical College of Nantong University, Wuxi, 214002, China
| | - Jinjin Jian
- Department of Anesthesiology, Affiliated Hospital of Jiangnan University, Wuxi, 214002, China
| | - Xiao Liang
- Department of Anesthesiology, Jiangnan University Medical Center, Affiliated Wuxi Clinical College of Nantong University, Wuxi, 214002, China.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Kaufmann M, Orth V, Dorwarth TJ, Benrath J, Gerber B, Ghezel-Ahmadi D, Reißfelder C, Herrle F. Two-stage laparoscopic transversus abdominis plane block as an equivalent alternative to thoracic epidural anaesthesia in bowel resection-an explorative cohort study. Int J Colorectal Dis 2024; 39:18. [PMID: 38206380 PMCID: PMC10784341 DOI: 10.1007/s00384-023-04592-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/28/2023] [Indexed: 01/12/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE We evaluated the effect of the two-stage laparoscopic transversus abdominis plane block (TS-L-TAPB) in comparison to thoracic epidural anaesthesia (TEA) and a one-stage L-TAPB (OS-L-TAPB) in patients who underwent elective laparoscopic bowel resection. METHODS We compared a TS-L-TAPB (266 mg bupivacaine), which was performed bilaterally at the beginning and end of surgery, with two retrospective cohorts. These were patients who had undergone a TEA (ropivacaine/sufentanil) or an OS-L-TAPB (200 mg ropivacaine) at the beginning of surgery. Oral and i.v. opiate requirements were documented over the first 3 postoperative days (POD). RESULTS Patients were divided into three groups TEA (n = 23), OS-L-TAPB (n = 75), and TS-L-TAPB (n = 49). By the evening of the third POD, patients with a TEA had a higher cumulative opiate requirement with a median of 45.625 mg [0; 202.5] than patients in the OS-L-TAPB group at 10 mg [0; 245.625] and the TS-L-TAPB group at 5.625 mg [0; 215.625] (p = 0.1438). One hour after arrival in the recovery room, significantly more patients in the TEA group (100%) did not need oral and i.v. opioids than in the TS-L-TAPB (78%) and OS-L-TAPB groups (68%) (p = 0.0067).This was without clinical relevance however as the median in all groups was 0 mg. On the third POD, patients in the TEA group had a significantly higher median oral and i.v. opioid dose at 40 mg [0; 80] than the TS-L-TAPB and OS-L-TAPB groups, both at 0 mg [0; 80] (p = 0.0009). CONCLUSION The TS-L-TAP showed statistically significant and clinically meaningful benefits over TEA and OS-L-TAP in reducing postoperative opiate requirements.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Kaufmann
- Department of Surgery, Medical Faculty Mannheim, University Medical Centre Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
| | - V Orth
- Department of Surgery, Medical Faculty Mannheim, University Medical Centre Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
| | - T-J Dorwarth
- Department of Surgery, Medical Faculty Mannheim, University Medical Centre Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
| | - J Benrath
- Department of Anesthesiology, Medical Faculty Mannheim, University Medical Centre Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
| | - B Gerber
- Department of Anesthesiology, Medical Faculty Mannheim, University Medical Centre Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
| | - D Ghezel-Ahmadi
- Department of Anesthesiology, Medical Faculty Mannheim, University Medical Centre Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
| | - C Reißfelder
- Department of Surgery, Medical Faculty Mannheim, University Medical Centre Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
| | - F Herrle
- Department of Surgery, Medical Faculty Mannheim, University Medical Centre Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Chai W, Wang S, Zhang D. Optimal dose of perineural dexamethasone for the prolongation of analgesia for peripheral nerve blocks: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open 2023; 13:e072598. [PMID: 37474174 PMCID: PMC10357643 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-072598] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/22/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Perineural use of dexamethasone is demonstrated to extend the analgesia duration of peripheral nerve blocks (PNB), but its optimal dose remains unclear. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to determine the optimal dose of perineural dexamethasone in the prolongation of analgesia for PNB. METHODS AND ANALYSIS PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and Web of Science will be searched from their inception to 1 March 2023. Language will be restricted to English. Randomised controlled trials that compared the efficacy and safety of different doses of perineural dexamethasone for PNB in adult patients will be included. Retrospective studies, reviews, meta-analyses, case reports, conference abstracts, comments and studies regarding paediatric surgeries will be excluded. The duration of analgesia will be defined as the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes will include pain scores, the total analgesic requirement over 48 hours and the incidence of adverse effects. Two reviewers will independently perform the study selection, data extraction and quality assessment. RevMan V.5.3 software will be used for data analysis. The quality of evidence will be assessed using the Grading of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION No ethical approval is required. The results of this study will be submitted to peer-reviewed journals. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER CRD42022385672.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wenjie Chai
- Department of Anesthesiology, Lanzhou Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Lanzhou, Gansu, China
| | - Shaopeng Wang
- Department of Anesthesiology, Lanzhou Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Lanzhou, Gansu, China
| | - Donghang Zhang
- Department of Anesthesiology, Sichuan University West China Hospital, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Alsharari AF, Abuadas FH, Alnassrallah YS, Salihu D. Transversus Abdominis Plane Block as a Strategy for Effective Pain Management in Patients with Pain during Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Systematic Review. J Clin Med 2022; 11:jcm11236896. [PMID: 36498471 PMCID: PMC9735918 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11236896] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2022] [Revised: 11/08/2022] [Accepted: 11/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC), unlike laparotomy, is an invasive surgical procedure, and some patients report mild to moderate pain after surgery. Transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block has been shown to be an appropriate method for postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing abdominal surgery. However, there have been few studies on the efficacy of TAP block after LC surgery, with unclear information on the optimal dose, long-term effects, and clinical significance, and the analgesic efficacy of various procedures, hence the need for this review. Five electronic databases (PubMed, Academic Search Premier, Web of Science, CINAHL, and Cochrane Library) were searched for eligible studies published from inception to the present. Post-mean and standard deviation values for pain assessed were extracted, and mean changes per group were calculated. Clinical significance was determined using the distribution-based approach. Four different local anesthetics (Bupivacaine, Ropivacaine, Lidocaine, and Levobupivacaine) were used at varying concentrations from 0.2% to 0.375%. Ten different drug solutions (i.e., esmolol, Dexamethasone, Magnesium Sulfate, Ketorolac, Oxycodone, Epinephrine, Sufentanil, Tropisetron, normal saline, and Dexmedetomidine) were used as adjuvants. The optimal dose of local anesthetics for LC could be 20 mL with 0.4 mL/kg for port infiltration. Various TAP procedures such as ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane (US-TAP) block and other strategies have been shown to be used for pain management in LC; however, TAP blockade procedures were reported to be the most effective method for analgesia compared with general anesthesia and port infiltration. Instead of 0.25% Bupivacaine, 1% Pethidine could be used for the TAP block procedures. Multimodal analgesia could be another strategy for pain management. Analgesia with TAP blockade decreases opioid consumption significantly and provides effective analgesia. Further studies should identify the long-term effects of different TAP block procedures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Dauda Salihu
- College of Nursing, Jouf University, Sakaka 72388, Saudi Arabia
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Chen JQ, Chen JR, Wang S, Gao W, Gu H, Yang XL, Hu JC, Chai XQ, Wang D. Effect of Perineural Dexamethasone with Ropivacaine in Continuous Serratus Anterior Plane Block for Postoperative Analgesia in Patients Undergoing Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery. J Pain Res 2022; 15:2315-2325. [PMID: 35992248 PMCID: PMC9386172 DOI: 10.2147/jpr.s372071] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2022] [Accepted: 08/05/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose The goal of this study was to evaluate the analgesic efficiency of dexamethasone with ropivacaine in continuous serratus anterior plane block (cSAPB) after video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS). Patients and Methods Sixty-six patients who underwent VATS were randomized into two groups. All patients received cSAPB postoperatively, and patients in Group RD received 20 mL of 0.375% ropivacaine plus 0.1 mg/kg dexamethasone followed by an infusion of 0.2% ropivacaine plus 0.02 mg/kg/hour dexamethasone at a rate of 5 mL/h in patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) pump. Patients in Group R received 20 mL of 0.375% ropivacaine with normal saline followed by an infusion of 5 mL/h of 0.2% ropivacaine in PCA pump. Fifty milligrams of tramadol was given as rescue medication when the visual analog scale (VAS) score was ≥4 at rest. The primary outcomes were the sum of pressing number within 48 hours postoperatively and the time to the first patient-controlled bolus. The secondary outcomes were VAS scores, the incidence of rescue analgesia, wound infection and nausea/vomiting. Results Within 48 hours postoperatively, the sum of pressing number was more in Group R (18.33 ± 3.149 vs 16.09 ± 3.292, P = 0.006), and the Log Rank Test showed a significant difference in time to the first patient-controlled bolus (P = 0.006). After the PCA infusion finished, there were significantly lower VAS scores in Group RD at 60 and 72 hours postoperatively (P < 0.001). Additionally, the incidence of rescue analgesia in Group R was significantly more than that in Group RD (P < 0.001). No incision infection was observed in any patient. Conclusion The cSAPB with ropivacaine plus dexamethasone prolonged the duration of analgesia and motor blockade, reduced pain intensity and rescued analgesia requirements after the end of PCA infusion for patients undergoing VATS, which provide further improvement to continuous perineural block.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jia-Qi Chen
- Pain Clinic, Department of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC (Anhui Provincial Hospital), Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, People's Republic of China
| | - Jie-Ru Chen
- Pain Clinic, Department of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC (Anhui Provincial Hospital), Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, People's Republic of China
| | - Sheng Wang
- Pain Clinic, Department of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC (Anhui Provincial Hospital), Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, People's Republic of China
| | - Wei Gao
- Pain Clinic, Department of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC (Anhui Provincial Hospital), Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, People's Republic of China
| | - Hai Gu
- Pain Clinic, Department of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC (Anhui Provincial Hospital), Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, People's Republic of China
| | - Xin-Lu Yang
- Pain Clinic, Department of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC (Anhui Provincial Hospital), Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, People's Republic of China
| | - Ji-Cheng Hu
- Pain Clinic, Department of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC (Anhui Provincial Hospital), Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, People's Republic of China
| | - Xiao-Qing Chai
- Pain Clinic, Department of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC (Anhui Provincial Hospital), Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, People's Republic of China
| | - Di Wang
- Pain Clinic, Department of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC (Anhui Provincial Hospital), Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, People's Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Nerve Blocks in Breast Plastic Surgery: Outcomes, Complications, and Comparative Efficacy. Plast Reconstr Surg 2022; 150:1e-12e. [PMID: 35499513 DOI: 10.1097/prs.0000000000009253] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND As plastic surgeons continue to evaluate the utility of nonopioid analgesic alternatives, nerve block use in breast plastic surgery remains limited and unstandardized, with no syntheses of the available evidence to guide consensus on optimal approach. METHODS A systematic review was performed to evaluate the role of pectoralis nerve blocks, paravertebral nerve blocks, transversus abdominus plane blocks, and intercostal nerve blocks in flap-based breast reconstruction, prosthetic-based reconstruction, and aesthetic breast plastic surgery, independently. RESULTS Thirty-one articles reporting on a total of 2820 patients were included in the final analysis; 1500 patients (53 percent) received nerve blocks, and 1320 (47 percent) served as controls. Outcomes and complications were stratified according to procedures performed, blocks employed, techniques of administration, and anesthetic agents used. Overall, statistically significant reductions in opioid consumption were reported in 91 percent of studies evaluated, postoperative pain in 68 percent, postanesthesia care unit stay in 67 percent, postoperative nausea and vomiting in 53 percent, and duration of hospitalization in 50 percent. Nerve blocks did not significantly alter surgery and/or anesthesia time in 83 percent of studies assessed, whereas the overall, pooled complication rate was 1.6 percent. CONCLUSIONS Transversus abdominus plane blocks provided excellent outcomes in autologous breast reconstruction, whereas both paravertebral nerve blocks and pectoralis nerve blocks demonstrated notable efficacy and versatility in an array of reconstructive and aesthetic procedures. Ultrasound guidance may minimize block-related complications, whereas the efficacy of adjunctive postoperative infusions was proven to be limited. As newer anesthetic agents and adjuvants continue to emerge, nerve blocks are set to represent essential components of the multimodal analgesic approach in breast plastic surgery.
Collapse
|
10
|
Yang J, Zhao M, Zhang XR, Wang XR, Wang ZH, Feng XY, Lei YJ, Zhang JW. Ropivacaine with Dexmedetomidine or Dexamethasone in a Thoracic Paravertebral Nerve Block Combined with an Erector Spinae Plane Block for Thoracoscopic Lobectomy Analgesia: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Drug Des Devel Ther 2022; 16:1561-1571. [PMID: 35655534 PMCID: PMC9152436 DOI: 10.2147/dddt.s366428] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2022] [Accepted: 05/13/2022] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective This study aimed to investigate the effect of ropivacaine with dexmedetomidine or dexamethasone in a thoracic paravertebral nerve block (TPVB) combined with an erector spinae plane block (ESPB) for thoracoscopic lobectomy analgesia. Methods A total of 97 patients undergoing thoracoscopic lobectomy under general anesthesia were enrolled in this study and randomly divided into three groups, ie, a ropivacaine group (Group R), a ropivacaine + dexmedetomidine group (Group R1), and a ropivacaine + dexamethasone group (Group R2). Ultrasound-guided TPVB combined with an erector spinae plane block was given after anesthesia induction. The following were applied to each group: Group R received 30 mL of 0.5% ropivacaine + 5 mL of a normal saline mixture; Group R1 received 30 mL of 0.5% ropivacaine + 5 mL of a 1 μg/kg dexmedetomidine mixture; Group R2 received 30 mL of 0.5% ropivacaine + 5 mL of an 8 mg dexamethasone mixture. The primary observation index was the time to the first postoperative remedial analgesia. The secondary observation indexes were the intraoperative consumption of propofol and sufentanil, time to waking from anesthesia, time to extubation, postoperative numerical rating scaltpe (NRS) score, postoperative sufentanil consumption, remedial analgesic dosage, and adverse reactions. Results When compared with Group R, the time to first postoperative remedial analgesia was longer, the intraoperative and postoperative sufentanil consumption and flurbiprofen axetil remedial analgesic dose were lower, and the time to waking from anesthesia and time to extubation were shorter in groups R1 and R2 (P < 0.05). The NRS scores at 1, 6, 12, and 24 h postoperatively in groups R1 and R2 were lower than in Group R at the same time points (P < 0.05). Conclusion Ropivacaine with dexmedetomidine or dexamethasone in TPVB combined with ESPB could prolong the time to first postoperative remedial analgesia, reduce perioperative sufentanil and postoperative remedial analgesic drug consumption, and decrease the postoperative NRS score in patients undergoing thoracoscopic lobectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jing Yang
- Department of Anesthesiology, Third Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Shanxi Bethune Hospital, Shanxi Academy of Medical University, Tongji Shanxi Hospital, Taiyuan, 030032, People’s Republic of China
| | - Min Zhao
- Department of Anesthesiology, Third Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Shanxi Bethune Hospital, Shanxi Academy of Medical University, Tongji Shanxi Hospital, Taiyuan, 030032, People’s Republic of China
| | - Xiao-Rui Zhang
- Department of Anesthesiology, Third Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Shanxi Bethune Hospital, Shanxi Academy of Medical University, Tongji Shanxi Hospital, Taiyuan, 030032, People’s Republic of China
| | - Xiao-Rui Wang
- Department of Anesthesiology, Third Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Shanxi Bethune Hospital, Shanxi Academy of Medical University, Tongji Shanxi Hospital, Taiyuan, 030032, People’s Republic of China
| | - Zhi-Hao Wang
- Department of Anesthesiology, Third Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Shanxi Bethune Hospital, Shanxi Academy of Medical University, Tongji Shanxi Hospital, Taiyuan, 030032, People’s Republic of China
| | - Xiao-Yue Feng
- Department of Pain Management, Third Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Shanxi Bethune Hospital, Shanxi Academy of Medical University, Tongji Shanxi Hospital, Taiyuan, 030032, People’s Republic of China
| | - Ya-Juan Lei
- Department of Anesthesiology, Third Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Shanxi Bethune Hospital, Shanxi Academy of Medical University, Tongji Shanxi Hospital, Taiyuan, 030032, People’s Republic of China
| | - Jian-Wen Zhang
- Department of Anesthesiology, Third Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Shanxi Bethune Hospital, Shanxi Academy of Medical University, Tongji Shanxi Hospital, Taiyuan, 030032, People’s Republic of China
- Department of Day Surgery, Third Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Shanxi Bethune Hospital, Shanxi Academy of Medical University, Tongji Shanxi Hospital, Taiyuan, 030032, People’s Republic of China
- Correspondence: Jian-Wen Zhang, Department of Anesthesiology and Department of Day Surgery, Third Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Shanxi Bethune Hospital, Shanxi Academy of Medical University, Tongji Shanxi Hospital, No. 99 of Longcheng Street, Xiaodian District, Taiyuan, 030032, People’s Republic of China, Tel +86 13994299284, Email
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Aga A, Abrar M, Ashebir Z, Seifu A, Zewdu D, Teshome D. The use of perineural dexamethasone and transverse abdominal plane block for postoperative analgesia in cesarean section operations under spinal anesthesia: an observational study. BMC Anesthesiol 2021; 21:292. [PMID: 34809573 PMCID: PMC8607620 DOI: 10.1186/s12871-021-01513-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/15/2021] [Accepted: 11/05/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Background During transverses abdominal plane block (TAP) procedure to provide analgesia in cesarean section (CS) operation, the use of perineural dexamethasone as an additive agent may improve pain relief and may cause a prolonged block duration. This study aims to investigate whether perineural dexamethasone, when added to bupivacaine local anesthetic agent during a TAP block, may provide adequate pain relief without adverse events. Methods This is a prospective cohort study of fifty-eight patients undergoing elective CS with spinal anesthesia. We hypothesized to perform bilateral TAP block using perineural dexamethasone as an additive agent. The patients were randomly divided into two groups using a systematic random sampling method. While one group of patients received perineural dexamethasone of 8 mg additive agent together with bupivacaine 0.25% 40 ml (Group TAPD), the other group received only bupivacaine 0.25% 40 ml in TAP block (Group TAPA). The primary outcomes are the period for the first request of postoperative pain relief medication and the numerical rating scale (NRS) pain intensity scores at 2, 6, 12, and 24 h after surgery. The secondary outcomes are comparing the 24-h tramadol and diclofenac analgesic requirements and the incidences of side effects on postoperative day one. A p-value of < 0.05 is statistically significant. Results The time to first analgesic request was 8.5 h (8.39–9.79) in the TAPD group versus 5.3 h (5.23–5.59) in the TAPA group, respectively. (p < 0.001) The median NRS scores were significantly reduced in the TAPD group compared to the TAPA group at 6, 12, and 24 h after surgery (p-values < 0.001). The total analgesics consumption over 24 h postoperatively was lower in Group TAPD compared to Group TAPA (p < 0.05). Conclusion An additive agent of perineural dexamethasone at a dose of 8 mg during bilateral TAP block for elective CS operation under spinal anesthesia provided better pain relief on postoperative day 1.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abdisa Aga
- Department of Anesthesia, Harar College of Health Science, Harar, Ethiopia
| | - Meron Abrar
- Department of Anesthesia, College of Health Science, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
| | - Zewetir Ashebir
- Department of Anesthesia, College of Health Science, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
| | - Ashenafi Seifu
- Department of Anesthesia, College of Health Science, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
| | - Dereje Zewdu
- Department of Anesthesia, College of Health Science, Wolkite University, PO. Box: 1362, Wolkite, Ethiopia.
| | - Diriba Teshome
- Department of Anesthesia, College of Health Science, Debre Tabor University, Debre Tabor, Ethiopia
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
A Prospective Randomized Trial of Surgeon-Administered Intraoperative Transversus Abdominis Plane Block With Bupivacaine Against Liposomal Bupivacaine: The TINGLE Trial. Dis Colon Rectum 2021; 64:888-898. [PMID: 34086002 DOI: 10.1097/dcr.0000000000002008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Transversus abdominis plane blocks are increasingly used to achieve opioid-sparing analgesia after colorectal surgery. Traditionally, bupivacaine was the long-acting analgesic of choice, but the addition of dexamethasone and/or epinephrine to bupivacaine may extend block duration. Liposomal bupivacaine has also been suggested to achieve an extended analgesia duration of 72 hours but is significantly more expensive. OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to compare pain control between laparoscopic transversus abdominis plane blocks using liposomal bupivacaine versus bupivacaine with epinephrine and dexamethasone. DESIGN This was a parallel-group, single-institution, randomized clinical trial. SETTINGS The study was conducted at a single tertiary medical center. PATIENTS Consecutive patients between October 2018 to October 2019, ages 18 to 90 years, undergoing minimally invasive colorectal surgery with multimodal analgesia were included. INTERVENTIONS Patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive a laparoscopic transversus abdominis plane block with liposomal bupivacaine or bupivacaine with epinephrine and dexamethasone. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The primary outcome was total oral morphine equivalents administered in the first 48 hours postoperatively. Secondary outcomes included pain scores, time to ambulation and solid diet, hospital length of stay, and complications. RESULTS A total of 102 patients (50 men) with a median age of 42 years (interquartile range, 29-60 y) consented and were randomly assigned. The primary end point, total oral morphine equivalents administered in the first 48 hours, was not significantly different between the liposomal bupivacaine group (median = 69 mg) and the bupivacaine with epinephrine and dexamethasone group (median = 47 mg; difference in medians = 22 mg, (95% CI, -17 to 49 mg); p = 0.60). There were no significant differences in pain scores, time to ambulation, time to diet tolerance, time to bowel movement, length of stay, overall complications, or readmission rate between groups. There were no treatment-related adverse outcomes. LIMITATIONS This study was not placebo controlled or blinded. CONCLUSIONS This first randomized trial comparing laparoscopic transversus abdominis plane block with liposomal bupivacaine or bupivacaine with epinephrine and dexamethasone showed that a liposomal bupivacaine block does not provide superior or extended analgesia in the era of standardized multimodal analgesia protocols.See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B533. ESTUDIO PROSPECTIVO Y RANDOMIZADO DE BLOQUEO DEL PLANO MUSCULAR TRANSVERSO DEL ABDOMEN REALIZADO POR EL CIRUJANO CON BUPIVACANA VERSUS BUPIVACANA LIPOSOMAL ESTUDIO TINGLE ANTECEDENTES:El bloqueo anestésico del plano muscular transverso del abdomen se utiliza cada vez más para lograr una analgesia con menos consumo de opioides después de cirugía colorrectal. Tradicionalmente, la Bupivacaína era el analgésico de acción prolongada de elección, pero al agregarse Dexametasona y/o Adrenalina a la Bupivacaína se puede prolongar la duración del bloqueo. También se ha propuesto que la Bupivacaína liposomal logra una duración prolongada de la analgesia de 72 horas, pero es significativamente más cara.OBJETIVO:Comparar el control del dolor entre bloqueo laparoscópico del plano de los transversos del abdomen usando Bupivacaína liposomal versus Bupivacaína con Adrenalina y Dexametasona.DISEÑO:Estudio clínico prospectivo y randomizado de una sola institución en grupos paralelos.AJUSTE:Centro médico terciario único.PACIENTES:Todos aquellos pacientes entre 18 y 90 años sometidos a cirugía colorrectal mínimamente invasiva con analgesia multimodal, entre octubre de 2018 a octubre de 2019 incluidos de manera consecutiva.INTERVENCIONES:Los pacientes fueron seleccionados aleatoriamente 1:1 para recibir un bloqueo laparoscópico del plano de los transversos del abdomen con Bupivacaína liposomal o Bupivacaína con Adrenalina y Dexametasona.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:El resultado primario fue el total de equivalentes de morfina oral administradas en las primeras 48 horas después de la operación. Los resultados secundarios incluyeron puntuaciones de dolor, inicio de dieta sólida, tiempo de inicio a la deambulación, la estadía hospitalaria y las complicaciones.RESULTADOS:Un total de 102 pacientes (50 hombres) con una mediana de edad de 42 años (IQR 29-60) fueron incluidos aleatoriamente. El criterio de valoración principal, equivalentes de morfina oral total administrada en las primeras 48 horas, no fue significativamente diferente entre el grupo de Bupivacaína liposomal (mediana = 69 mg) y el grupo de Bupivacaína con Adrenalina y Dexametasona (mediana = 47 mg; diferencia en medianas = 22 mg, IC del 95% [-17] - 49 mg, p = 0,60). No hubo diferencias significativas en las puntuaciones de dolor, tiempo de inicio a la deambulación, el tiempo de tolerancia a la dieta sólida, el tiempo hasta el primer evacuado intestinal, la duración de la estadía hospitalaria, las complicaciones generales o la tasa de readmisión entre los grupos. No hubo resultados adversos relacionados con el tratamiento.LIMITACIONES:Este estudio no fue controlado con placebo ni de manera cegada.CONCLUSIONES:Este primer estudio prospectivo y randomizado que comparó el bloqueo del plano de los músculos transversos del abdomen por vía laparoscópica, utilizando Bupivacaína liposomal o Bupivacaína con Adrenalina y Dexametasona, demostró que el bloqueo de Bupivacaína liposomal no proporciona ni mejor analgesia ni un efecto mas prolongado.Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B533.
Collapse
|
13
|
Marti K, Rochon C, O'Sullivan DM, Ye X, Ebcioglu Z, Kainkaryam PP, Kuzaro H, Morgan G, Serrano OK, Singh J, Tremaglio J, Kutzler HL. Evaluation of a multimodal analgesic regimen on outcomes following laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy. Clin Transplant 2021; 35:e14311. [PMID: 33829561 DOI: 10.1111/ctr.14311] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2021] [Revised: 03/24/2021] [Accepted: 04/01/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Postoperative pain is a significant source of morbidity in patients undergoing living donor nephrectomy (LDN) and a deterrent for candidates. We implemented a standardized multimodal analgesic regimen, which consists of pharmacist-led pre-procedure pain management education, a combination transversus abdominis plane and rectus sheath block performed by the regional anesthesia team, scheduled acetaminophen and gabapentin, and as-needed opioids. This single-center retrospective study evaluated outcomes between patients undergoing LDN who received a multimodal analgesic regimen and a historical cohort. The multimodal cohort had a significantly shorter length of stay (LOS) (days, mean ± SD: 1.8 ± 0.7 vs. 2.6 ± 0.8; p < .001) and a greater proportion who were discharged on postoperative day (POD) 1 (38.6% vs. 1.5%; p < .001). The total morphine milligram equivalents (MME) that patients received during hospitalization were significantly less in the multimodal cohort on POD 0-2. The outpatient MME prescribed through POD 60 was also significantly less in the multimodal cohort (median [IQR]; 180 [150-188] vs. 225 [150-300]; p < .001). The mean patient-reported pain score (PRPS) was significantly lower in the multimodal cohort on POD 0-2. The maximum PRPS was significantly lower on POD 0 (mean ± SD: 7 ± 2 vs. 8 ± 1, respectively; p = .02). This study suggests that our multimodal regimen significantly reduces LOS, PRPS, and opioid requirements and has the potential to improve the donation experience.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kristen Marti
- Department of Pharmacy Services, Hartford Hospital, Hartford, CT, USA
| | - Caroline Rochon
- Department of Transplant, Hartford Hospital, Hartford, CT, USA
| | - David M O'Sullivan
- Department of Research Administration, Hartford HealthCare, Hartford, CT, USA
| | - Xiaoyi Ye
- Department of Transplant, Hartford Hospital, Hartford, CT, USA
| | - Zeynep Ebcioglu
- Department of Transplant, Hartford Hospital, Hartford, CT, USA
| | | | - Hillary Kuzaro
- Department of Pharmacy Services, Hartford Hospital, Hartford, CT, USA.,Department of Transplant, Hartford Hospital, Hartford, CT, USA
| | - Glyn Morgan
- Department of Transplant, Hartford Hospital, Hartford, CT, USA
| | - Oscar K Serrano
- Department of Transplant, Hartford Hospital, Hartford, CT, USA
| | - Joseph Singh
- Department of Transplant, Hartford Hospital, Hartford, CT, USA
| | | | - Heather L Kutzler
- Department of Pharmacy Services, Hartford Hospital, Hartford, CT, USA.,Department of Transplant, Hartford Hospital, Hartford, CT, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Abdelwahab WAEM, Elzahaby HM, ElGendy HAA, Elwahab ATSA, Hussien RM. Safety and efficacy of dexamethasone as an adjuvant to bupivacaine in bilateral transversus abdominis plane block in children undergoing major abdominal surgery. AIN-SHAMS JOURNAL OF ANESTHESIOLOGY 2020; 12:52. [DOI: 10.1186/s42077-020-00105-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2020] [Accepted: 10/11/2020] [Indexed: 09/01/2023]
Abstract
Abstract
Background
This prospective randomized controlled double-blind clinical study was conducted on 52 patients of both genders divided into two groups (26 patients each). Local anaesthetic solution of isobaric bupivacaine 0.25% (0.3 ml/kg) was prepared. Group A received bilateral transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block with bupivacaine and dexamethasone (0.3 mg/kg) while group B received bilateral TAP block with bupivacaine and volume of saline equal to the amount of dexamethasone given in group A. Patients were observed for FLACC pain scale at the time of discharge from the post-anaesthesia care unit and then every 2 h for 36 h after the operation. This study was conducted to assess the safety and efficacy of adding dexamethasone to bupivacaine on the quality of bilateral US-guided transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block in children undergoing major abdominal surgery
Results
Dexamethasone added to local anaesthetic in ultrasound-guided TAP block significantly decreased FLACC score at 8, 10, and 12 up to 24 h postoperatively, The time to the first requested analgesia was prolonged in the dexamethasone group (P = 0.000). The total dose of acetaminophen consumption over 36 h after surgery was also reduced (P = 0.000), but no difference was found regarding the total dose of rectal diclofenac (P = 0.068).
Conclusion
Adding dexamethasone to isobaric bupivacaine TAP block reduces postoperative pain and analgesic requirements compared to isobaric bupivacaine TAP block alone in children undergoing major abdominal surgery.
Collapse
|
15
|
Kaya C, Genc C. Anesthesia for open inguinal hernia repair with ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane block in a high-risk elderly patient: Case report. REVISTA ESPANOLA DE ANESTESIOLOGIA Y REANIMACION 2020; 67:572-574. [PMID: 32284195 DOI: 10.1016/j.redar.2020.01.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2019] [Revised: 12/30/2019] [Accepted: 01/23/2020] [Indexed: 06/11/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- C Kaya
- Department of Anesthesiology, School of Medicine, Ondokuz Mayis University, Samsun, Turkey.
| | - C Genc
- Department of Anesthesiology, School of Medicine, Ondokuz Mayis University, Samsun, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Zhu Y, Xiao T, Qu S, Chen Z, Du Z, Wang J. Transversus Abdominis Plane Block With Liposomal Bupivacaine vs. Regular Anesthetics for Pain Control After Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Front Surg 2020; 7:596653. [PMID: 33251245 PMCID: PMC7674642 DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2020.596653] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/20/2020] [Accepted: 10/05/2020] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Transverse abdominal plane (TAP) blocks are used to provide pain relief after abdominopelvic surgeries. The role of liposomal bupivacaine (LB) for TAP blocks is unclear. Therefore, this study aimed to synthesize evidence on the efficacy of LB vs. regular anesthetics in improving outcomes of TAP block. Methods: PubMed, Science Direct, Embase, Springer, and CENTRAL databases were searched up to July 24, 2020. Studies comparing LB with any regular anesthetic for TAP block for any surgical procedure and reporting total analgesic consumption (TAC) or pain scores were included. Results: Seven studies including five randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were reviewed. LB was compared with regular bupivacaine (RB) in all studies. A descriptive analysis was conducted for TAC due to heterogeneity in data presentation. There were variations in the outcomes of studies reporting TAC. Meta-analysis of pain scores indicated statistically significant reduction of pain with the use of LB at 12 h (MD: -0.89 95% CI: -1.44, -0.34 I2 = 0% p = 0.01), 24 h (MD: -0.64 95% CI: -1.21, -0.06 I2 = 0% p = 0.03), 48 h (MD: -0.40 95% CI: -0.77, 0.04 I2 = 0% p = 0.03) but not at 72 h (MD: -0.37 95% CI: -1.31, 0.56 I2 = 57% p = 0.43). Pooled analysis indicated no difference in the duration of hospital stay between LB and RB (MD: -0.18 95% CI: -0.49, 0.14 I2 = 61% p = 0.27). LB significantly reduced the number of days to first ambulation postsurgery (MD: -0.28 95% CI: -0.50, -0.06 I2 = 0% p = 0.01). Conclusions: Current evidence on the role of LB for providing prolonged analgesia with TAP blocks is unclear. Conflicting results have been reported for TAC. LB may result in a small reduction in pain scores up to 48 h but not at 72 h. Further, high-quality homogenous RCTs are needed to establish high-quality evidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Shuangquan Qu
- Department of Anesthesiology, Hunan Children's Hospital, Changsha, China
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Abdelwahab WAEM, Elzahaby HM, ElGendy HAA, Elwahab ATSA, Hussien RM. Safety and efficacy of dexamethasone as an adjuvant to bupivacaine in bilateral transversus abdominis plane block in children undergoing major abdominal surgery. AIN-SHAMS JOURNAL OF ANESTHESIOLOGY 2020. [DOI: doi.org/10.1186/s42077-020-00105-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
Abstract
Background
This prospective randomized controlled double-blind clinical study was conducted on 52 patients of both genders divided into two groups (26 patients each). Local anaesthetic solution of isobaric bupivacaine 0.25% (0.3 ml/kg) was prepared. Group A received bilateral transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block with bupivacaine and dexamethasone (0.3 mg/kg) while group B received bilateral TAP block with bupivacaine and volume of saline equal to the amount of dexamethasone given in group A. Patients were observed for FLACC pain scale at the time of discharge from the post-anaesthesia care unit and then every 2 h for 36 h after the operation. This study was conducted to assess the safety and efficacy of adding dexamethasone to bupivacaine on the quality of bilateral US-guided transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block in children undergoing major abdominal surgery
Results
Dexamethasone added to local anaesthetic in ultrasound-guided TAP block significantly decreased FLACC score at 8, 10, and 12 up to 24 h postoperatively, The time to the first requested analgesia was prolonged in the dexamethasone group (P = 0.000). The total dose of acetaminophen consumption over 36 h after surgery was also reduced (P = 0.000), but no difference was found regarding the total dose of rectal diclofenac (P = 0.068).
Conclusion
Adding dexamethasone to isobaric bupivacaine TAP block reduces postoperative pain and analgesic requirements compared to isobaric bupivacaine TAP block alone in children undergoing major abdominal surgery.
Collapse
|
18
|
Yano T, Imaizumi T, Matsu-Ura H, Takahashi T. Relationship between dexamethasone added to periarticular anesthetic infiltration and postoperative nausea and vomiting following total knee arthroplasty under general anesthesia: a retrospective observational study. JA Clin Rep 2020; 6:66. [PMID: 32822007 PMCID: PMC7442779 DOI: 10.1186/s40981-020-00372-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2020] [Accepted: 08/14/2020] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Periarticular anesthetic infiltration (PAI) with a corticosteroid is a modality for pain control following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Systemic corticosteroids are an established antiemetic for the prophylaxis of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV). The purpose of this retrospective observational study was to elucidate the relationship between dexamethasone added to PAI and PONV in patients who underwent TKA. Methods Data from 435 patients who received PAI using ropivacaine with or without dexamethasone were reviewed. The primary outcome was the incidence of PONV within 24 h following TKA. The incidence of deep incisional and organ/space surgical site infection (SSI) within the first year was also assessed. Results The overall incidence of PONV was 23.2%. A multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that dexamethasone added to PAI was independently associated with a reduced incidence of PONV (adjusted odds ratio, 0.23; 95% confidence interval, 0.12–0.44, P < 0.001). The incidence of PONV and rescue analgesic requirements within 24 h were lower in patients who received PAI with dexamethasone than in those who received PAI alone (19.5% vs 49.1%, P < 0.001, 7.9% vs 29.1%, P < 0.001, respectively). SSI developed in one out of the 55 patients who received PAI alone, but in none of those who received PAI with dexamethasone. Conclusions Dexamethasone added to PAI for postoperative pain management was independently associated with a lower risk of PONV within 24 h of TKA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Toshiyuki Yano
- Division of Anesthesia, Kumamoto Kinoh Hospital, 6-8-1 Yamamuro, Kita-ku, Kumamoto, 860-8518, Japan.
| | - Takashi Imaizumi
- Division of Anesthesia, Kumamoto Kinoh Hospital, 6-8-1 Yamamuro, Kita-ku, Kumamoto, 860-8518, Japan
| | - Hidemi Matsu-Ura
- Department of Pharmacy, Kumamoto Kinoh Hospital, 6-8-1 Yamamuro, Kita-ku, Kumamoto, 860-8518, Japan
| | - Tomoki Takahashi
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Kumamoto Kinoh Hospital, 6-8-1 Yamamuro, Kita-ku, Kumamoto, 860-8518, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Dmytriiev D, Lisak Y, Zaletska O. Adjuvants in pain medicine. Selection of the drug depending on the desired effect – so which drug to choose? PAIN MEDICINE 2020. [DOI: 10.31636/pmjua.v5i2.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
To date, much research has focused on finding the ideal adjuvant for local anesthetics. Each of them can have different effects. In anesthesiology and pain medicine, depending on the purpose, one or another effect may be desirable. For example, in some situations it is desirable to accelerate the onset of action or prolong the duration of the block, in others the desired effect may be a “response to intravascular administration”, it should also be borne in mind that not all adjuvants are allowed for intrathecal administration.
Collapse
|
20
|
Shen QH, Li HF, Zhou XY, Yuan XZ, Lu YP. Dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant for single spinal anesthesia in patients undergoing cesarean section: a system review and meta-analysis. J Int Med Res 2020; 48:300060520913423. [PMID: 32466699 PMCID: PMC7263150 DOI: 10.1177/0300060520913423] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Previous studies reported the effect of dexmedetomidine on intrathecal anesthesia. In this review, we explored the impact of dexmedetomidine as an adjunct for lumbar anesthesia in patients undergoing cesarean section. METHODS Two authors searched eligible random controlled trials in electronic databases, including PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, the Chinese BioMedical database, Chinese Scientific Journal Database, and the Wanfang database. RESULTS Ten trials comprising 970 patients were included in this review. Intrathecal dexmedetomidine significantly reduced the onset time of sensory block (standardized mean difference (SMD), -1.50, 95% confidence interval (CI) -2.15, -0.85, I2 = 92%) and motor block (SMD -0.77, 95% CI -1.50, -0.49, I2 = 60%) and prolonged the block duration time (sensory block: SMD 2.02, 95% CI 1.29, 2.74, I2 = 93%; motor block: SMD 1.90, 95% CI 1.07, 2.74, I2 = 94%). Patients who received dexmedetomidine showed a lower incidence of shivering. No significant difference was reported for the neonatal Apgar score and other complications. CONCLUSION The use of intrathecal dexmedetomidine during cesarean section can shorten the onset time of spinal anesthesia and enhance the effect of local anesthetic. It has no significant impact on neonates and there were no other adverse events.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qi-Hong Shen
- Department of Anesthesiology, Affiliated Hospital of Jiaxing University, The First Hospital of Jiaxing, Jiaxing, Zhejiang, China
| | - Hui-Fang Li
- Department of Gynecology, Tongxiang Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital, Tongxiang, Zhejiang, China
| | - Xu-Yan Zhou
- Department of Anesthesiology, Affiliated Hospital of Jiaxing University, The First Hospital of Jiaxing, Jiaxing, Zhejiang, China
| | - Xiao-Zong Yuan
- Department of Anesthesiology, Affiliated Hospital of Jiaxing University, The First Hospital of Jiaxing, Jiaxing, Zhejiang, China
| | - Ya-Ping Lu
- Department of Anesthesiology, Affiliated Hospital of Jiaxing University, The First Hospital of Jiaxing, Jiaxing, Zhejiang, China
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Liu HL, Zhou RH, Luo LL, Yuan X, Ye L, Luo HG. Ultrasound-Guided Transversus Abdominis Plane Block for Cesarean Delivery: Injection Site Pain as a New Complication and Dexamethasone Reduced Incidence. J Pain Res 2020; 13:565-573. [PMID: 32256104 PMCID: PMC7090204 DOI: 10.2147/jpr.s222767] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/11/2019] [Accepted: 03/07/2020] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Although ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane block (TAPB) is widely used in multimodal analgesia after cesarean delivery (CD), the complications of TAPB during analgesia after CD have rarely been reported. Methods A total of 84 cases of CD were randomly assigned to either a ropivacaine group (R group) or ropivacaine + dexamethasone group (RD group) in this double-blind trial. The pain site and pain degree at rest and during activity at 2 h, 6 h, 10 h, 12 h, 14 h, 16 h, 20 h, and 24 h after maternal surgery were recorded. The consumption of opioids at 24h, postoperative nausea, vomiting, exhaustion, and other adverse reactions were recorded. Results A total of 80 patients were included in the analysis of results. A total of 19 patients developed ISP, 14 in the R group and 5 in the RD group. The incidence of ISP in the R and RD groups was 35% and 12.5%, respectively. The results described above showed that combining dexamethasone with ropivacaine reduced the incidence of ISP, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). Two groups of women with positive ISP had higher values of opioid consumption than women with negative ISP, but the difference was not significant. Conclusion Dexamethasone as an adjuvant for ropivacaine can effectively relieve the ISP of ultrasound-guided TAPB after CD, and can enhance the analgesic effect of ropivacaine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hai-Lin Liu
- Department of Anesthesiology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi 330008, People's Republic of China
| | - Rui-Hao Zhou
- Department of Pain Management, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610041, People's Republic of China
| | - Li-Li Luo
- Department of Anesthesiology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi 330008, People's Republic of China
| | - Xue Yuan
- Department of Anesthesiology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi 330008, People's Republic of China
| | - Ling Ye
- Department of Pain Management, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610041, People's Republic of China
| | - He-Guo Luo
- Department of Anesthesiology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi 330008, People's Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Scholzen E, Zeng AM, Schroeder KM. Perioperative Management and Analgesia for Patients Taking Buprenorphine and Other Forms of Medication-Assisted Treatment for Substance Abuse Disorders. Adv Anesth 2019; 37:65-86. [PMID: 31677660 DOI: 10.1016/j.aan.2019.08.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabeth Scholzen
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin, 600 Highland Avenue, B6/319 CSC, Madison, WI 53792, USA
| | - Angela M Zeng
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin, 600 Highland Avenue, B6/319 CSC, Madison, WI 53792, USA
| | - Kristopher M Schroeder
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin, 600 Highland Avenue, B6/319 CSC, Madison, WI 53792, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Transversus Abdominis Plane (TAP) and Rectus Sheath Blocks: a
Technical Description and Evidence Review. CURRENT ANESTHESIOLOGY REPORTS 2019. [DOI: 10.1007/s40140-019-00351-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/16/2023]
|
24
|
Bala R, Kiran S, Kumar K. Comparison of analgesic efficacy of dexamethasone versus tramadol as adjuvant to ropivacaine for oblique subcostal transversus abdominis plane block in open cholecystectomy. INDIAN JOURNAL OF PAIN 2019. [DOI: 10.4103/ijpn.ijpn_62_19] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
|