Outcomes and challenges of a kidney transplant programme at Groote Schuur Hospital, Cape Town: A South African perspective

Challenges to establishing and maintaining kidney transplantation programs in developing countries: What are the coping strategies?

Kidney transplantation (KT) is the optimal form of renal replacement therapy for patients with end-stage renal diseases. However, this health service is not available to all patients, especially in developing countries. The deceased donor KT programs are mostly absent, and the living donor KT centers are scarce. Single-center studies presenting experiences from developing countries usually report a variety of challenges. This review addresses these challenges and the opposing strategies by reviewing the single-center experiences of developing countries. The financial challenges hamper the infrastructural and material availability, coverage of transplant costs, and qualification of medical personnel. The sociocultural challenges influence organ donation, equity of beneficence, and regular follow-up work. Low interests and motives for transplantation may result from high medicolegal responsibilities in KT practice, intense potential psychosocial burdens, complex qualification protocols, and low productivity or compensation for KT practice. Low medical literacy about KT advantages is prevalent among clinicians, patients, and the public. The inefficient organizational and regulatory oversight is translated into inefficient healthcare systems, absent national KT programs and registries, uncoordinated job descriptions and qualification protocols, uncoordinated on-site investigations with regulatory constraints, and the prevalence of commercial KT practices. These challenges resulted in noticeable differences between KT services in developed and developing countries. The coping strategies can be summarized in two main mechanisms: The first mechanism is maximizing the available resources by increasing the rates of living kidney donation, promoting the expertise of medical personnel, reducing material consumption, and supporting the establishment and maintenance of KT programs. The latter warrants the expansion of the public sector and the elimination of non-ethical KT practices. The second mechanism is recruiting external resources, including financial, experience, and training agreements.

Act Together and Act Now to Overcome Gender Disparity in Organ Transplantation

Gender disparity refers to the unequal treatment or a perception of individuals based on their gender and arises from differences in socially constructed gender roles. In the field of transplantation, gender inequality arises at different stages, affecting access to medical care, donation practices, and posttransplant followup care. Gender disparity in transplantation is not limited to any geographic region but is thought to be more prevalent in developing nations. An unusually high number of female donations with relatively fewer female recipients is not only attributable to the low economy but a congregation of medical, social, cultural, and psychological factors. Gender disparities can also be shown in transplant-related professional societies. This review highlights the complexities of spousal donation and vulnerability of women, especially in the developing world. There is a growing need to further modify transplant policies to tackle gender disparities, especially in living related donation. Systematic research in the context of gender-related concerns in transplantation will further aid in understanding the complexities and formulating policies for eliminating gender disparities. Gender disparity is a global problem and not merely limited to transplantation.

The impact of diabetes and hypertension on renal allograft survival- A single center study

Background

To determine the impact of pre-transplant diabetes mellitus (DM) and post-transplant hypertension (HT) at 1 year on renal allograft survival in all adult first kidney-only (FKO) transplant recipients at a single transplant center in Johannesburg, South Africa.

Materials and methods

A retrospective review was conducted of all adult FKO transplant procedures at the Charlotte Maxeke Johannesburg Academic Hospital transplant unit between 1966 and 2013.

Results

During the stipulated timeframe, 1685 adult FKO transplant procedures were performed. Of these, 84.1% were from deceased donors (n = 1413/1685). The prevalence of pre-transplant DM transplant recipients with no missing or incomplete records was 6.5% (n = 107/1625). Of the total cohort of 1685 adult FKO transplant recipients, 63.6% of those with no missing data survived to 1 year (n = 1072/1685). The prevalence of HT at 1-year post-transplant was 53.6% (n = 503/1072). HT at 1-year post-transplant, even after adjusted survival analysis, proved a significant risk factor for renal allograft loss (hazard ratio, 1.63; 95% confidence interval, 1.37-1.94) (p < 0.0001). Similarly, after adjusted survival analysis, the risk of renal allograft loss within the pre-transplant DM group was significantly higher (p = 0.043; hazard ratio, 1.26; 95% confidence interval, 1.01-1.58).

Conclusions

This study identified pre-transplantation diabetes mellitus and post-transplantation HT as significant risk factors for graft loss within the population assessed in this region of the world. These factors could potentially be used as independent predictors of renal graft survival.

The state of kidney replacement therapy in Eastern Cape Province, South Africa: A call to action

Background. South Africa (SA) is one of the most financially unequal countries in the world. This situation is highlighted by disparateaccess to healthcare, particularly provision of kidney replacement therapy (KRT). Unlike the private sector, public sector access to KRT is highly rationed, and patient selection is based on suitability for transplantation and capacity.Objectives. To investigate the state of the KRT service in Eastern Cape Province, SA, by analysing access to and provision of KRT in theprovince for individuals with end-stage kidney disease, as well as disparities between the private and public healthcare systems.Methods. This was a retrospective descriptive study to examine KRT provision and temporal trends in the Eastern Cape. Data were obtained from the South African Renal Registry and the National Transplant Waiting List. KRT provision was compared between the three main referral centres, in Gqeberha (formerly Port Elizabeth), East London and Mthatha, and between the private and public healthcare systems.Results. There were 978 patients receiving KRT in the Eastern Cape, with an overall treatment rate of 146 per million population (pmp).The treatment rate for the private sector was 1 435 pmp, compared with 49 pmp in the public sector. Patients treated in the private sector were older at initiation of KRT (52 v. 34 years), and more likely to be male, to be HIV positive, and to receive haemodialysis as their KRT modality. Peritoneal dialysis was more commonly used in Gqeberha and East London as the first and subsequent KRT modality, compared with Mthatha. There were no patients from Mthatha on the transplant waiting list. There were no waitlisted HIV-positive patients in the public sector in East London, compared with 16% of the public sector patients in Gqeberha. The kidney transplant prevalence rate was 58 pmp in the private sector and 19 pmp in the public sector, with a combined prevalence of 22 pmp, constituting 14.9% of all patients on KRT. We estimated the shortfall of KRT provision in the public sector to be ~8 606 patients.Conclusion. Patients in the private sector were 29 times more likely to access KRT than their public sector counterparts, who were onaverage 18 years younger at initiation of KRT, probably reflecting selection bias in an overburdened public health system. Transplantation rates were low in both sectors, and lowest in Mthatha. A large public sector KRT provision gap exists in the Eastern Cape and needs to be addressed urgently.

Global Estimates of Capacity for Kidney Transplantation in World Countries and Regions

BACKGROUND

Kidney transplantation (KT) is the optimal treatment for kidney failure and is associated with better quality of life and survival relative to dialysis. However, knowledge of the current capacity of countries to deliver KT is limited. This study reports on findings from the 2018 International Society of Nephrology Global Kidney Health Atlas survey, specifically addressing the availability, accessibility, and quality of KT across countries and regions.

METHODS

Data were collected from published online sources, and a survey was administered online to key stakeholders. All country-level data were analyzed by International Society of Nephrology region and World Bank income classification.

RESULTS

Data were collected via a survey in 182 countries, of which 155 answered questions pertaining to KT. Of these, 74% stated that KT was available, with a median incidence of 14 per million population (range: 0.04-70) and median prevalence of 255 per million population (range: 3-693). Accessibility of KT varied widely; even within high-income countries, it was disproportionately lower for ethnic minorities. Universal health coverage of all KT treatment costs was available in 31%, and 57% had a KT registry.

CONCLUSIONS

There are substantial variations in KT incidence, prevalence, availability, accessibility, and quality worldwide, with the lowest rates evident in low- and lower-middle income countries. Understanding these disparities will inform efforts to increase awareness and the adoption of practices that will ensure high-quality KT care is provided around the world.