Differential scanning fluorimetric analysis of the amino-acid binding to taste receptor using a model receptor protein, the ligand-binding domain of fish T1r2a/T1r3

A review of biophysical strategies to investigate protein-ligand binding: What have we employed?

The protein-ligand binding frequently occurs in living organisms and plays a crucial role in the execution of the functions of proteins and drugs. It is also an indispensable part of drug discovery and screening. While the methods for investigating protein-ligand binding are diverse, each has its own objectives, strengths, and limitations, which all influence the choice of method. Many studies concentrate on one or a few specific methods, suggesting that comprehensive summaries are lacking. Therefore in this review, these methods are comprehensively summarized and are discussed in detail: prediction and simulation methods, thermal and thermodynamic methods, spectroscopic methods, methods of determining three-dimensional structures of the complex, mass spectrometry-based methods and others. It is also important to integrate these methods based on the specific objectives of the research. With the aim of advancing pharmaceutical research, this review seeks to deepen the understanding of the protein-ligand binding process.

Chemical range recognized by the ligand-binding domain in a representative amino acid-sensing taste receptor, T1r2a/T1r3, from medaka fish

Taste receptor type 1 (T1r) proteins are responsible for recognizing nutrient chemicals in foods. In humans, T1r2/T1r3 and T1r1/T1r3 heterodimers serve as the sweet and umami receptors that recognize sugars or amino acids and nucleotides, respectively. T1rs are conserved among vertebrates, and T1r2a/T1r3 from medaka fish is currently the only member for which the structure of the ligand-binding domain (LBD) has been solved. T1r2a/T1r3 is an amino acid receptor that recognizes various l-amino acids in its LBD as observed with other T1rs exhibiting broad substrate specificities. Nevertheless, the range of chemicals that are recognized by T1r2a/T1r3LBD has not been extensively explored. In the present study, the binding of various chemicals to medaka T1r2a/T1r3LBD was analyzed. A binding assay for amino acid derivatives verified the specificity of this protein to l-α-amino acids and the importance of α-amino and carboxy groups for receptor recognition. The results further indicated the significance of the α-hydrogen for recognition as replacing it with a methyl group resulted in a substantially decreased affinity. The binding ability to the protein was not limited to proteinogenic amino acids, but also to non-proteinogenic amino acids, such as metabolic intermediates. Besides l-α-amino acids, no other chemicals showed significant binding to the protein. These results indicate that all of the common structural groups of α-amino acids and their geometry in the l-configuration are recognized by the protein, whereas a wide variety of α-substituents can be accommodated in the ligand binding sites of the LBDs.

Contribution of Nudt12 enzyme to differentially methylated dinucleotides of 5'RNA cap structure

Recent findings have substantially broadened our knowledge about the diversity of modifications of the 5'end of RNAs, an issue generally attributed to mRNA cap structure (m⁷GpppN). Nudt12 is one of the recently described new enzymatic activities involved in cap metabolism. However, in contrast to its roles in metabolite-cap turnover (e.g., NAD-cap) and NADH/NAD metabolite hydrolysis, little is known regarding its hydrolytic activity towards dinucleotide cap structures. In order to gain further insight into this Nudt12 activity, comprehensive analysis with a spectrum of cap-like dinucleotides was performed with respect to different nucleotide types adjacent to the (m⁷)G moiety and its methylation status. Among the tested compounds, GpppA, GpppA_m, and Gpppm⁶A_m were identified as novel potent Nudt12 substrates, with K_M values in the same range as that of NADH. Interestingly, substrate inhibition of Nudt12 catalytic activity was detected in the case of the GpppG dinucleotide, a phenomenon not reported to date. Finally, comparison of Nudt12 with DcpS and Nud16, two other enzymes with known activity on dinucleotide cap structures, revealed their overlapping and more specific substrates. Altogether, these findings provide a basis for clarifying the role of Nudt12 in cap-like dinucleotide turnover.

Chloride ions evoke taste sensations by binding to the extracellular ligand-binding domain of sweet/umami taste receptors

Salt taste sensation is multifaceted: NaCl at low or high concentrations is preferably or aversively perceived through distinct pathways. Cl^- is thought to participate in taste sensation through an unknown mechanism. Here, we describe Cl^- ion binding and the response of taste receptor type 1 (T1r), a receptor family composing sweet/umami receptors. The T1r2a/T1r3 heterodimer from the medaka fish, currently the sole T1r amenable to structural analyses, exhibited a specific Cl^- binding in the vicinity of the amino-acid-binding site in the ligand-binding domain (LBD) of T1r3, which is likely conserved across species, including human T1r3. The Cl^- binding induced a conformational change in T1r2a/T1r3LBD at sub- to low-mM concentrations, similar to canonical taste substances. Furthermore, oral Cl^- application to mice increased impulse frequencies of taste nerves connected to T1r-expressing taste cells and promoted their behavioral preferences attenuated by a T1r-specific blocker or T1r3 knock-out. These results suggest that the Cl^- evokes taste sensations by binding to T1r, thereby serving as another preferred salt taste pathway at a low concentration.

eSPC: an online data-analysis platform for molecular biophysics

All biological processes rely on the formation of protein-ligand, protein-peptide and protein-protein complexes. Studying the affinity, kinetics and thermodynamics of binding between these pairs is critical for understanding basic cellular mechanisms. Many different technologies have been designed for probing interactions between biomolecules, each based on measuring different signals (fluorescence, heat, thermophoresis, scattering and interference, among others). Evaluation of the data from binding experiments and their fitting is an essential step towards the quantification of binding affinities. Here, user-friendly online tools to analyze biophysical data from steady-state fluorescence spectroscopy, microscale thermophoresis and differential scanning fluorimetry experiments are presented. The modules of the data-analysis platform (https://spc.embl-hamburg.de/) contain classical thermodynamic models and clear user guidelines for the determination of equilibrium dissociation constants (Kd) and thermal unfolding parameters such as melting temperatures (Tm).

FoldAffinity: binding affinities from nDSF experiments

Differential scanning fluorimetry (DSF) using the inherent fluorescence of proteins (nDSF) is a popular technique to evaluate thermal protein stability in different conditions (e.g. buffer, pH). In many cases, ligand binding increases thermal stability of a protein and often this can be detected as a clear shift in nDSF experiments. Here, we evaluate binding affinity quantification based on thermal shifts. We present four protein systems with different binding affinity ligands, ranging from nM to high μM. Our study suggests that binding affinities determined by isothermal analysis are in better agreement with those from established biophysical techniques (ITC and MST) compared to apparent K_ds obtained from melting temperatures. In addition, we describe a method to optionally fit the heat capacity change upon unfolding (\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\Delta {C}_{p}$$\end{document}ΔCp) during the isothermal analysis. This publication includes the release of a web server for easy and accessible application of isothermal analysis to nDSF data.

Current pivotal strategies leading a difficult target protein to a sample suitable for crystallographic analysis

Crystallographic structural analysis is an essential method for the determination of protein structure. However, crystallization of a protein of interest is the most difficult process in the analysis. The process is often hampered during the sample preparation, including expression and purification. Even after a sample has been purified, not all candidate proteins crystallize. In this mini-review, the current methodologies used to overcome obstacles encountered during protein crystallization are sorted. Specifically, the strategy for an effective crystallization is compared with a pipeline where various expression hosts and constructs, purification and crystallization conditions, and crystallization chaperones as target-specific binder proteins are assessed by a precrystallization screening. These methodologies are also developed continuously to improve the process. The described methods are useful for sample preparation in crystallographic analysis and other structure determination techniques, such as cryo-electron microscopy.