Economic evaluation of HPV DNA test as primary screening method for cervical cancer: A health policy discussion in Greece

"Barriers and Advantages of Self-Sampling Tests, for HPV Diagnosis: A Qualitative Field Experience Before Implementation in a Rural Community in Ecuador"

Introduction

Cervical cancer screening has demonstrated high efficacy in reducing cervical cancer mortality worldwide. However, clinician sampling is often perceived as an uncomfortable procedure that could reduce screening uptake. Self-sampling methods for HPV diagnosis have shown high sensitivity, which could increase acceptance and screening rates among women.

Purpose

This study aims to identify the perceived barriers and advantages of self-sampling methods versus clinician sampling for cervical cancer screening in a rural setting in Ecuador.

Patients and Methods

A qualitative study was conducted. Seven focus group discussions took place in the rural Parish of El Valle in Azuay Province, Cuenca, Ecuador. Women native to this rural area were included in the study. FGDs were recorded and transcribed, and content analysis was performed to categorize and analyze the data.

Results

A total of 45 women participated in the study. Clinician sampling was perceived as a painful and intrusive method. However, participants believed that it is more reliable compared to self-sampling methods, attributing this to the direct visualization of the cervix, which facilitates the detection of cervical pathologies. The perceived advantages of self-sampling included increased comfort, pain reduction, time savings, the ability to perform the test at home, and the potential for widespread availability through pharmacies or local traditional healers. Nevertheless, doubts about the test's reliability as well as the user's proficiency in self-testing posed barriers to the adoption of this technique.

Conclusion

Self-sampling methods offer several advantages over clinician sampling, such as enhanced privacy, comfort, and accessibility to cancer screening. Barriers primarily revolved around users' proficiency in performing the test and the reliability of the results. Providing training for using self-sampling tests could address these barriers.

Human Papillomavirus and Its Association With Cervical Cancer: A Review

The human papillomavirus (HPV) belongs to the Papillomavirus family and is considered a non-enveloped virus. HPV affects individuals by causing both benign and malignant lesions. We aim to define HPV and its important characteristics, explain the relation between HPVs and cervical cancer, review its prevalence among Saudi women and their awareness of screening and prevention of cervical cancer, and focus on the importance of HPV vaccination. The persistence of HPV infection is the most important risk factor for the development of cervical cancer. HPVs cannot be cultured, and the identification of the virus is dependent on a variety of techniques, including immunology, serology, and molecular biology. Cervical cancer is the fourth most prevalent form of cancer in women worldwide, while it is considered the 12th type of cancer that affects Saudi women. Unfortunately, many studies have shown a lack of awareness regarding HPV infection, screening, and vaccination among the Saudi population in general, as well as among Saudi healthcare professionals. The HPV vaccine has a potent role in preventing people from getting infected with the virus, despite some previous clinical trials assessing the outcomes of therapeutic HPV vaccinations showing unsatisfactory results. While there is no doubt about the benefits of vaccines and their role in reducing the incidence of HPV infectious diseases, there are discrepancies in the evaluation of the safety of the HPV vaccine. In conclusion, HPV is an essential etiology of cervical cancer, and the expansion of public awareness about protective methods and threat factors associated with HPV infection is highly important.

Impact of HPV molecular testing with partial genotyping as a feasibility study in cervical cancer community screening program in South India

Cervical cancer can be eradicated by 2030 by the implementation of a global strategy involving the vaccination of young girls against human papillomavirus (HPV), screening 70% of women in 30-69 years of age and treating 90% of the women with precancerous lesions. For a country with a large population like India, all the three strategies can be a challenge. There is a need for implementation of a high throughput technology that can be scalable. Cobas 4800, a multiplexed assay based on quantitative polymerase chain reaction technology, identifies HPV 16 and HPV 18 along with the concurrent detection of 12 pooled other high-risk HPV infections. This technology was used to test 10 375 women from the South Indian community for the first time as a feasibility program. Upon testing, high-risk HPV was found in 595 (5.73%) women. A total of 127 women (1.2%) were found to be infected with HPV 16, 36 women (0.34%) with HPV 18 and 382 women (3.68%) with the 12 pooled high-risk HPV and multiple mixed infections were found in 50 women (0.48%). It was observed that there was a high prevalence of high-risk HPV in younger women, 30-40 years of age and a second peak was observed at 46-50 years of age. The second peak had higher mixed infections in the 46-50 years of age and this association was statistically significant. We found that 24/50 (48%) of the multiple mixed high-risk HPV infections were in the age group 46-50 years. The current study is the first attempt from India, on a completely automated platform using Cobas 4800 HPV test in a community screening program. This study shows HPV 16 and HPV 18 infections, when differentiated, can be valuable for risk stratification in community screening program. Women in the perimenopausal age (46-50yrs) showed a higher prevalence of multiple mixed infections, signifying a higher risk.

An insight into clinical and laboratory detections for screening and diagnosis of cervical cancer

INTRODUCTION

Cervical cancer is the most frequent malignancy among women caused by an unresolved long-term infection with distinct human papillomavirus (HPV) genotypes. It is the fourth most common form of cancer among women worldwide. The two oncogenic genotypes, HPV 16 and 18, are responsible for >70% of all cervical cancers worldwide. Cervical cancer is one of the most successfully preventable and treatable forms of cancer if detected early.

AREAS COVERED

In this review article, we have summarizedsummarised the different approaches used in clinical diagnosis and research laboratories to detect HPV-related changes associated with cervical cancer for a better understanding of the advantages and limitations of these tests.

EXPERT OPINION

Despite the well-known screening strategies for cervical cancer, developing nations lack effective implementation due to various factors. With the current rate of cervical cancer cases, precise and timely identification of HPV can significantly impact the prevention and efficient management of cervical cancer. Cervical cancer is the most common gynecological cancer in developing countries. The primary screening test with cytology and molecular testing of HPV is important for preventing cervical cancer. To address these issues, several point-of-care assays have been developed to facilitate rapid screening of HPV with the least turnaround time.

A systematic review of economic evaluations of cervical cancer screening methods

OBJECTIVE

The aims of this systematic review were to (1) identify primary- and model-based economic evaluations of cervical cancer screening methods and to (2) provide a contextual summary of valuation outcomes associated with three types of cervical cancer screening tests: visual inspection with acetic acid, human papillomavirus deoxyribonucleic acid, and Papanicolaou smear.

INTRODUCTION

Cervical cancer screening is an important public health priority with the potential to improve the detection of precancerous lesions in high-risk females for early intervention and disease prevention. Test performance and cost-effectiveness differ based on the specific screening method used across different platforms. There is a need to appraise existing economic evaluations of cervical cancer screening methods.

METHODS

This review considered primary-based and model-based full economic evaluations of cervical cancer screening methods. The evaluation methods of interest included cost-effectiveness analysis, cost-utility analysis, cost-minimization analysis, cost-benefit analysis, and cost-consequence analysis. We searched Scopus, PubMed, National Health Economic Evaluation Database (NH EED), Cochrane, and the Health Economic Evaluation Database for full economic evaluations of cancer screening methods. No formal date restrictions were applied. Model-based and primary-based full economic evaluations were included. A critical appraisal of included studies was performed by the main investigator, while a second independent reviewer assessed critical appraisal findings for any inconsistencies. Data were extracted using a standardised data extraction tool for economic evaluations. The ultimate outcomes of costs, effectiveness, benefits, and utilities of cervical cancer screening modalities were extracted from included studies, analysed, and summarised.

RESULTS

From a total of 671 screened studies, 44 studies met the study inclusion criteria. Forty-three studies were cost-effectiveness analyses, one study reported both cost-utility and cost-effectiveness outcomes, and another study reported cost utilities of cervical cancer screening methods only. Human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA testing was reported as a dominant stand-alone screening test by 14 studies, while five studies reported visual inspection with acetic acid (VIA) as a dominant stand-alone screening test. Primary HPV screening strategies were dominant in 21 studies, while three studies reported cytology-based screening strategies as the dominant screening method.

CONCLUSIONS

Existing evidence indicates that HPV-based and VIA testing strategies are cost-effective, but this is dependent on setting. Our review suggests the limited cost-effectiveness of cytology-based testing, which may be due in part to the need for specific infrastructures and human resources.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

PROSPERO CRD42020212454 .

Distribution of the most common types of HPV in Iranian women with and without cervical cancer

Cervical cancer is an important cause of death in women worldwide. About 99.7% of all cervical cancers have been related to human papillomavirus, especially types 16 and 18. Types 6 and 11 cause genital warts. We aimed to determine the prevalence of common HPV genotypes among women in the general population and women with cervical cancer. A total of 571 healthy women cytology specimens and 113 tissue samples of cervical cancer were investigated using HPV type-specific primers. HPV DNA was detected in 24% of healthy women: 3.3% were positive for high-risk HPV and 11.6% for low-risk HPV. HPV6 (9.3%) had the highest prevalence followed by HPV11 (2.3%), HPV16 (1.8%), HPV18 (1.2%), and 9.1% of samples were positive for unknown types. Among cervical cancer samples, HPV DNA was found in 78.8% including 43.4% HPV16, 8% HPV18, and 27.4% an unknown HPV type. HPV6 and HPV11 were not detected in any cervical cancer cases and 21.2% were negative for HPV. We found no association between HPV-16/18 and age in cervical cancer. The prevalence of HPV infection is relatively high in Iran without vaccination backgrounds. HPV DNA screening and vaccination programs can prevent cervical cancer and health problems caused by genital warts.

Primary HPV screening for cervical cancer

Cytology-based cervical screening had unequivocal success in reducing the incidence and mortality of cervical cancer in the last century. The recognition of the role of human papillomavirus (HPV) as a necessary cause of cervical cancer led to the development of HPV testing. Gradually, there has been a shift from reflex HPV testing for mild cytological abnormalities, to co-testing with cytology and HPV, and lately to primary HPV screening, based on evidence from well-designed large randomized controlled trials and meta-analyses. Advantages of primary HPV screening include higher sensitivity to detect pre-neoplastic lesions, better re-assurance with a negative test, and safe prolongation of screening intervals. However, clinicians and policy makers must ensure the availability of clinically validated HPV assays and triage protocols of screen positive cases prior to implementation of primary HPV screening. This is likely to reduce potential harm from over-treatment as well as extra burden on the health care system.