The dual-target approach in viral HIV-1 viremia testing: An added value to virological monitoring?

HIV-1 RNA monitoring with a dual-target diagnostic assay: A case report

In a restricted subset of people living with HIV-1 (PLWH) on antiretroviral therapy (ART) with persistent suppressed viral load (i.e., pol-based HIV-RNA repeatedly undetected), a dual-target (pol and LTR) diagnostic assay for HIV-RNA monitoring can measure quantifiable levels of viral loads (VL) above 30 copies/mL exclusively through the amplification of the LTR region, while the pol target results undetected. We report a patient who shows high levels of HIV-RNA detected exclusively through amplification of the LTR region while undetected by the pol region, during a long monitoring period, from 2018 to date. In this follow-up, the ART was modified without reaching LTR-based undetected HIV-RNA values. Immunological and virological parameters remained optimal with a progressive and steady gain of the CD4/CD8 ratio. The clinical history of this patient, shows that LTR-based viremia above 50 copies/mL can be found occasionally or persistently in the plasma of PLWH under suppressive ART, even at high levels. Based on previous studies, VL detected and quantified exclusively through the amplification of the LTR region corresponds to partial or incomplete HIV-RNA transcripts, which cannot trigger new infections. Interestingly, changes in ART do not eliminate repeated findings of these unusual viral elements.

Use of laboratory-developed assays in global HIV-1 treatment-monitoring and research

There has been a surge in the emergence of HIV-1 drug resistance in Low and Middle-Income Countries (LMICs) due to poor drug-adherence and limited access to viral load testing, the current standard for treatment-monitoring. It is estimated that only 75% of people living with HIV (PLWH) worldwide have access to viral load testing. In LMICs, this figure is below 50%. In a recent WHO survey in mostly LMICs, 21 out of 30 countries surveyed found HIV-1 first-line pre-treatment drug resistance in over 10% of study participants. In the worst-affected regions, up to 68% of infants born to HIV-1 positive mothers were found to harbour first-line HIV-1 treatment resistance. This is a huge public health concern. Greater access to treatment-monitoring is required in LMICs if the UNAIDS "third 95" targets are to be achieved by 2030. Here, we review the current challenges of viral load testing and present the case for greater utilization of Laboratory-based assays that quantify intracellular HIV-1 RNA and/or DNA to provide broader worldwide access to HIV-1 surveillance, drug-resistance monitoring, and cure-research.

Evaluating the Dual-Target Aptima HIV-1 Quant Dx Assay: Comparison between Viral Loads Measured with pol and LTR Targets in the Same Samples

For effective management of HIV-1 patients, accurate measurement of HIV-1-RNA viral load (VL) is fundamental. The latest generation molecular assays for monitoring VL perform simultaneous detection of two regions of the viral genome, but without specifying the target used for VL quantitation. By using the "open" software (research use only [RUO]) of Aptima HIV-1 Quant Dx Assay (Aptima) which provides both results obtained with the pol and LTR targets, we were able to compare n = 500 plasma samples results from chronically HIV-1-infected patients under antiretroviral therapy (ART). Correlation and concordance were analyzed. By stratifying VL into two groups (<30 and ≥30 copies/mL HIV-1-RNA) according to pol-based results and matching them with their respective LTR values, concordance was substantial (κ = 0.635; 95%CI = 0.569 to 0.700) as expected. Considering the specimens (n = 224) with VL exactly quantified (i.e., ≥30 copies/mL) with both targets, an optimal correlation subsisted (r = 0.8882; P < 0.0001) and Bland-Altman plot showed no significant mean difference between them. However, by stratifying all these data in three ranges (30 to 200, 201 to 1,000, and >1,000 copies/mL) according to pol-based results, concordance analysis showed fair agreement (κ = 0.344; 95%CI = 0.257 to 0.432). Indeed, after excluding mutually concordant VL values in each range (n = 134), the remaining discordant samples (n = 90; 40.1%) showed significant (P < 0.05) difference between VL measured with the two targets. With the Aptima "open" software, samples with pol-based VL <1,000 copies (cp)/mL HIV-1-RNA, the corresponding LTR values were on average 0.5 log₁₀ cp/mL higher. Further studies on these discrepancies and the nature of viral RNA elements detected only with the LTR despite efficient ART are in progress. IMPORTANCE The last generation dual-target platforms for quantification of HIV-1 RNA return a single value of viral load (VL) derived from a combined reading of two HIV-1 genome targets. By using a modified version of Aptima software, providing both the VL results obtained from pol and LTR amplification separately, we observed discordant VL results in some samples from HIV-1-infected patients on antiretroviral therapy. In particular, some samples with pol-based quantified <1,000 copies/mL VL showed the LTR-based value on average 0.5 log₁₀ copies/mL higher, and other samples, always by treated patients, showed VL exclusively quantified with LTR target while the corresponding pol-based VL results were completely undetected. Standard software of double-target based diagnostic systems does not allow recognizing discrepant VL values in these particular, but not rare, clinical specimens. This issue could have implications for clinical management by leading physicians to consider changing antiretroviral regimen based on presumed failure of antiretroviral therapy.

Point-of-care viral load tests to detect high HIV viral load in people living with HIV/AIDS attending health facilities

BACKGROUND

Viral load (VL) testing in people living with HIV (PLHIV) helps to monitor antiretroviral therapy (ART). VL is still largely tested using central laboratory-based platforms, which have long test turnaround times and involve sophisticated equipment. VL tests with point-of-care (POC) platforms capable of being used near the patient are potentially easy to use, give quick results, are cost-effective, and could replace central or reference VL testing platforms.

OBJECTIVES

To estimate the diagnostic accuracy of POC tests to detect high viral load levels in PLHIV attending healthcare facilities.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched eight electronic databases using standard, extensive Cochrane search methods, and did not use any language, document type, or publication status limitations. We also searched the reference lists of included studies and relevant systematic reviews, and consulted an expert in the field from the World Health Organization (WHO) HIV Department for potentially relevant studies. The latest search was 23 November 2020.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included any primary study that compared the results of a VL test with a POC platform to that of a central laboratory-based reference test to detect high viral load in PLHIV on HIV/AIDS care or follow-up. We included all forms of POC tests for VL as defined by study authors, regardless of the healthcare facility in which the test was conducted. We excluded diagnostic case-control studies with healthy controls and studies that did not provide sufficient data to create the 2 × 2 tables to calculate sensitivity and specificity. We did not limit our study inclusion to age, gender, or geographical setting.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently screened the titles, abstracts, and full texts of the search results to identify eligible articles. They also independently extracted data using a standardized data extraction form and conducted risk of bias assessment using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS-2) tool. Using participants as the unit of analysis, we fitted simplified univariable models for sensitivity and specificity separately, employing a random-effects model to estimate the summary sensitivity and specificity at the current and commonly reported World Health Organization (WHO) threshold (≥ 1000 copies/mL). The bivariate models did not converge to give a model estimate.

MAIN RESULTS

We identified 18 studies (24 evaluations, 10,034 participants) defining high viral loads at main thresholds ≥ 1000 copies/mL (n = 20), ≥ 5000 copies/mL (n = 1), and ≥ 40 copies/mL (n = 3). All evaluations were done on samples from PLHIV retrieved from routine HIV/AIDS care centres or health facilities. For clinical applicability, we included 14 studies (20 evaluations, 8659 participants) assessing high viral load at the clinical threshold of ≥ 1000 copies/mL in the meta-analyses. Of these, sub-Saharan Africa, Europe, and Asia contributed 16, three, and one evaluation respectively. All included participants were on ART in only nine evaluations; in the other 11 evaluations the proportion of participants on ART was either partial or not clearly stated. Thirteen evaluations included adults only (n = 13), five mixed populations of adults and children, whilst in the remaining two the age of included populations was not clearly stated. The majority of evaluations included commercially available tests (n = 18). Ten evaluations were POC VL tests conducted near the patient in a peripheral or onsite laboratory, whilst the other 10 were evaluations of POC VL tests in a central or reference laboratory setting. The test types evaluated as POC VL tests included Xpert HIV-1 Viral Load test (n = 8), SAMBA HIV-1 Semi-Q Test (n = 9), Alere Q NAT prototype assay for HIV-1 (n = 2) and m-PIMA HIV-1/2 Viral Load test (n = 1). The majority of evaluations (n = 17) used plasma samples, whilst the rest (n = 3) utilized whole blood samples. Pooled sensitivity (95% confidence interval (CI)) of POC VL at a threshold of ≥ 1000 copies/mL was 96.6% (94.8 to 97.8) (20 evaluations, 2522 participants), and pooled specificity (95% CI) was 95.7% (90.8 to 98.0) (20 evaluations, 6137 participants). Median prevalence for high viral load (≥ 1000 copies/mL) (n = 20) was 33.4% (range 6.9% to 88.5%). Limitations The risk of bias was mostly assessed as unclear across the four domains due to incomplete reporting.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

We found POC VL to have high sensitivity and high specificity for the diagnosis of high HIV viral load in PLHIV attending healthcare facilities at a clinical threshold of ≥ 1000 copies/mL.

Dosing of Extracorporeal Cytokine Removal In Septic Shock (DECRISS): protocol of a prospective, randomised, adaptive, multicentre clinical trial

INTRODUCTION

Sepsis and septic shock have mortality rates between 20% and 50%. In sepsis, the immune response becomes dysregulated, which leads to an imbalance between proinflammatory and anti-inflammatory mediators. When standard therapeutic measures fail to improve patients' condition, additional therapeutic alternatives are applied to reduce morbidity and mortality. One of the most recent alternatives is extracorporeal cytokine adsorption with a device called CytoSorb. This study aims to compare the efficacy of standard medical therapy and continuous extracorporeal cytokine removal with CytoSorb therapy in patients with early refractory septic shock. Furthermore, we compare the dosing of CytoSorb adsorber device changed every 12 or 24 hours.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

It is a prospective, randomised, controlled, open-label, international, multicentre, phase III study. Patients fulfilling the inclusion criteria will be randomly assigned to receive standard medical therapy (group A) or-in addition to standard treatment-CytoSorb therapy. CytoSorb treatment will be continuous and last for at least 24 hours, CytoSorb adsorber device will be changed every 12 (group B) or 24 hours (group C). Our primary outcome is shock reversal (no further need or a reduced (≤10% of the maximum dose) vasopressor requirement for 3 hours) and time to shock reversal (number of hours elapsed from the start of the treatment to shock reversal).Based on sample size calculation, 135 patients (1:1:1) will need to be enrolled in the study. A predefined interim analysis will be performed after reaching 50% of the planned sample size, therefore, the corrected level of significance (p value) will be 0.0294.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Ethics approval was obtained from the Scientific and Research Ethics Committee of the Hungarian Medical Research Council (OGYÉI/65049/2020). Results will be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT04742764; Pre-results.

Correction: The dual-target approach in viral HIV-1 viremia testing: An added value to virological monitoring?

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0228192.].