Attributable burden in patients with carbapenem-nonsusceptible gram-negative respiratory infections

Real-world in vitro activity of newer antibiotics against Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa, including carbapenem-non-susceptible and multidrug-resistant isolates: a multicenter analysis

IMPORTANCE

Newer antibiotics against Gram-negative pathogens provide important treatment options, especially for antibiotic-resistant bacteria, but little is known about their use during routine clinical care. To use these agents appropriately, clinicians need to have access to timely susceptibility data. We evaluated 27,531 facility-reported susceptibility results from the BD Insights Research Database to gain a better understanding of real-world testing practices and susceptibility rates for six newer antibiotics. Escherichia coli was the most frequently tested potential pathogen, and ceftazidime-avibactam and ceftolozane-tazobactam had the greatest numbers of susceptibility results. For cefiderocol, eravacycline, imipenem-relabactam, and meropenem-vaborbactam, susceptibility data were available for fewer than 2% of isolates. Susceptibility comparisons should be considered with caution. Ceftazidime-avibactam had the highest susceptibility rates for Enterobacterales while cefiderocol had the highest susceptibility rates for Pseudomonas aeruginosa. New antibiotics have the potential to improve the management of Gram-negative infections, but their use may be hampered by the absence of susceptibility data.

Characteristics, costs, and outcomes associated with central-line-associated bloodstream infection and hospital-onset bacteremia and fungemia in US hospitals

OBJECTIVES

To compare characteristics and outcomes associated with central-line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSIs) and electronic health record-determined hospital-onset bacteremia and fungemia (HOB) cases in hospitalized US adults.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective observational study of patients in 41 acute-care hospitals. CLABSI cases were defined as those reported to the National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN). HOB was defined as a positive blood culture with an eligible bloodstream organism collected during the hospital-onset period (ie, on or after day 4). We evaluated patient characteristics, other positive cultures (urine, respiratory, or skin and soft-tissue), and microorganisms in a cross-sectional analysis cohort. We explored adjusted patient outcomes [length of stay (LOS), hospital cost, and mortality] in a 1:5 case-matched cohort.

RESULTS

The cross-sectional analysis included 403 patients with NHSN-reportable CLABSIs and 1,574 with non-CLABSI HOB. A positive non-bloodstream culture with the same microorganism as in the bloodstream was reported in 9.2% of CLABSI patients and 32.0% of non-CLABSI HOB patients, most commonly urine or respiratory cultures. Coagulase-negative staphylococci and Enterobacteriaceae were the most common microorganisms in CLABSI and non-CLABSI HOB cases, respectively. In case-matched analyses, CLABSIs and non-CLABSI HOB, separately or combined, were associated with significantly longer LOS [difference, 12.1-17.4 days depending on intensive care unit (ICU) status], higher costs (by $25,207-$55,001 per admission), and a >3.5-fold increased risk of mortality in patients with an ICU encounter.

CONCLUSIONS

CLABSI and non-CLABSI HOB cases are associated with significant increases in morbidity, mortality, and cost. Our data may help inform prevention and management of bloodstream infections.

Risk of relapse and readmission among hospitalized adults with carbapenem non-susceptible gram-negative infections

BACKGROUND

Infections caused by carbapenem-nonsusceptible gram-negative (C-NS) pathogens are associated with increased mortality and high treatment costs. Identification of potentially modifiable factors that may improve patient outcomes is important for better management of C-NS GN infections.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study of hospitalized adults with electronic health record evidence of complicated urinary tract infection (cUTI), bacterial pneumonia (BP), complicated intra-abdominal infection (cIAI), or bacteremia (BAC) due to C-NS GN organisms from January 2013 to March 2018. Treatment patterns and clinical characteristics during the index hospitalization were analyzed descriptively and stratified by infection site(s). The effect of patient characteristics on index infection relapse during the postdischarge period and on readmission with 30 days was modeled using logistic regression.

RESULTS

The study included 2,862 hospitalized patients with C-NS GN infections. Index infection sites were 38.4% cUTI ± BAC, 21.5% BP ± BAC, 18.7% cUTI + BP ± BAC, 14.7% any cIAI, and 6.7% BAC only. The majority of patients (83.6%) received an antibiotic during their index hospitalization; among these, the most common classes given were penicillins (52.9%), fluoroquinolones (50.7%), and carbapenems (38.9%). During the postdischarge period, 21.7% of patients had a relapse of the index infection and 63.9% of patients were readmitted to the hospital. Factors associated with increased adjusted odds ratio (OR) for relapse or readmission included Charlson comorbidity score of ≥3 relative to 0 (relapse: OR [95% CI] = 1.34 [1.01-1.76], p = .040; readmission: OR [95% CI] 1.92 [1.50-2.46], p < .001), preindex immunocompromised status (relapse: OR [95% CI] 1.37 [1.05-1.79], p = .019; readmission: OR [95% CI] = 1.60 [1.27-2.02], p < .001), and preindex carbapenem use (relapse: OR [95% CI] = 1.35 [1.07-1.72], p = .013; readmission: OR [95% CI] = 1.25 [1.00-1.57], p = .048).

CONCLUSIONS

Adverse postdischarge outcomes were common among hospitalized patients with C-NS GN infections and were significantly associated with previous carbapenem use and patient clinical characteristics such as higher comorbidity burden and immunocompromised status. Adoption of antimicrobial stewardship and consideration of individual patient risk factors in making treatment decisions may help improve clinical outcomes.

The economic burden of antibiotic resistance: A systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Antibiotic resistance (ABR) has substantial global public health concerns. This systematic review aimed to synthesise recent evidence estimating the economic burden of ABR, characterised by study perspectives, healthcare settings, study design, and income of the countries.

METHODS

This systematic review included peer-reviewed articles from PubMed, Medline, and Scopus databases, and grey literature on the topic of the economic burden of ABR, published between January 2016 and December 2021. The study was reported in line with 'Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis' (PRISMA). Two reviewers independently screened papers for inclusion first by title, then abstract, and then the full text. Study quality was assessed using appropriate quality assessment tools. Narrative synthesis and meta-analyses of the included studies were conducted.

RESULTS

A total of 29 studies were included in this review. Out of these studies, 69% (20/29) were conducted in high-income economies and the remainder were conducted in upper-and-middle income economies. Most of the studies were conducted from a healthcare or hospital perspective (89.6%, 26/29) and 44.8% (13/29) studies were conducted in tertiary care settings. The available evidence indicates that the attributable cost of resistant infection ranges from -US$2,371.4 to +US$29,289.1 (adjusted for 2020 price) per patient episode; the mean excess length of stay (LoS) is 7.4 days (95% CI: 3.4-11.4), the odds ratios of mortality for resistant infection is 1.844 (95% CI: 1.187-2.865) and readmission is 1.492 (95% CI: 1.231-1.807).

CONCLUSION

Recent publications show that the burden of ABR is substantial. There is still a lack of studies on the economic burden of ABR from low-income economies, and lower-middle-income economies, from a societal perspective, and in relation to primary care. The findings of this review may be of value to researchers, policymakers, clinicians, and those who are working in the field of ABR and health promotion.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

CRD42020193886.

Relationships between creatinine increase and mortality rates in patients given vancomycin in 76 hospitals: The increasing role of infectious disease pharmacists

PURPOSE

Vancomycin is a commonly used antimicrobial with the potential for renal toxicity. We evaluated vancomycin duration, changes in renal function after vancomycin initiation ("post-vancomycin" renal function changes), and associated mortality risk among hospitalized patients.

METHODS

We analyzed data from 76 hospitals and excluded patients with a baseline serum creatinine concentration (SCr) of >3.35 mg/dL. We estimated mortality risk relative to vancomycin duration and the magnitude of post-vancomycin SCr change, controlling for demographics, baseline SCr, underlying diseases, clinical acuity, and comorbidities.

RESULTS

Among 128,993 adult inpatients treated with vancomycin, 49.0% did not experience SCr elevation. Among the remaining patients, 26.0%, 11.4%, 8.8% and 4.8% experienced increases in post-vancomycin SCr of 1% to 20%, 21% to 40%, 41% to 100%, and greater than 100%, respectively. Compared to mortality risk among patients with a vancomycin therapy duration between 4 and 5 days (the lowest-mortality group), longer vancomycin therapy duration was not independently associated with higher mortality risk after adjusting for confounders. In contrast, there was a graded relationship between post-vancomycin SCr elevation and mortality. Multivariable adjusted mortality odds ratios ranged from 1.60 to 13.66, corresponding to SCr increases of 10% and greater than 200%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Half of patients given vancomycin did not experience SCr elevation and had the lowest mortality, suggesting that vancomycin can be used safely if renal function is stabilized. In the large study cohort, vancomycin duration itself was not an independent predictor of mortality. Post-vancomycin SCr elevation appeared to be a driver of in-hospital mortality. Even a 10% SCr increase from baseline prior to vancomycin infusion was associated with increased mortality risk. This finding stresses the importance of closely monitoring renal function and may support the value of pharmacokinetic dosing.

Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam: A Review in Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections

Imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam (Recarbrio™) is an intravenously administered combination of the carbapenem imipenem, the renal dehydropeptidase-I inhibitor cilastatin, and the novel β-lactamase inhibitor relebactam. Relebactam is a potent inhibitor of class A and class C β-lactamases, conferring imipenem activity against many imipenem-nonsusceptible strains. Imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam is approved in the USA and EU for the treatment of hospital-acquired bacterial pneumonia (HABP) and ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia (VABP) in adults and other gram-negative infections, including complicated urinary tract infections (cUTIs) [including pyelonephritis] and complicated intra-abdominal infections (cIAIs), in adults with limited or no alternative treatment options. In pivotal phase II and III trials, imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam was noninferior to piperacillin/tazobactam in patients with HABP/VABP and to imipenem/cilastatin in patients with cUTIs and cIAIs. It was also effective in imipenem-nonsusceptible infections. Imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam was generally well tolerated, with a safety profile consistent with that of imipenem/cilastatin. Available evidence indicates that imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam is an effective and generally well tolerated option for gram-negative infections in adults, including critically ill and/or high-risk patients, and a potential therapy for infections caused by carbapenem-resistant pathogens.