Serum pepsinogens as a gastric cancer and gastritis biomarker in South and Southeast Asian populations

Non-Invasive Markers for the Detection of Gastric Precancerous Conditions

Gastric cancer (GC) is still one of the most prevalent cancers worldwide, with a high mortality rate, despite improvements in diagnostic and therapeutic strategies. To diminish the GC burden, a modification of the current diagnostic paradigm, and especially endoscopic diagnosis of symptomatic individuals, is necessary. In this review article, we present a broad review and the current knowledge status on serum biomarkers, including pepsinogens, gastrin, Gastropanel®, autoantibodies, and novel biomarkers, allowing us to estimate the risk of gastric precancerous conditions (GPC)-atrophic gastritis and gastric intestinal metaplasia. The aim of the article is to emphasize the role of non-invasive testing in GC prevention. This comprehensive review describes the pathophysiological background of investigated biomarkers, their status and performance based on available data, as well as their clinical applicability. We point out future perspectives of non-invasive testing and possible new biomarkers opportunities.

Probiotic Supplementation With Saccharomyces boulardii and Enterococcus faecium Improves Gastric Pain and Bloating in Airline Pilots With Chronic Non-atrophic Gastritis: An Open-Label Study

Background Commercial airline pilots (APs) are prone to upper gastrointestinal symptoms, such as epigastric pain and bloating. These issues are often linked to occupational risk factors like irregular diet, sleep disruption, and circadian rhythm disturbance. The use of probiotics to enhance intestinal health is well established, but their efficacy in treating upper gastrointestinal diseases is still debated. This is primarily due to the stomach's small resident microbiota and its low pH, which is inhospitable to most microbes. However, emerging research suggests that specific probiotic strains, such as Enterococcus faecium, can withstand acidic environments. Moreover, certain yeast species, including Saccharomyces boulardii, can survive at a low pH. Consequently, we conducted a preliminary, three-arm, randomized, open-label, dose-finding, four-week study to compare the effects of watchful waiting (WW) with the administration of an oral probiotic supplement containing S. boulardii and E. faecium in APs diagnosed with Helicobacter pylori-negative chronic non-atrophic gastritis (CNG). Methods The study included 39 APs with CNG who were randomized into three groups with a 1:1:1 ratio. The low-dose group (n = 13) received one capsule of the probiotic supplement twice daily, before meals, for four weeks. The high-dose group (n = 13) was administered two capsules of the supplement on the same schedule. The third group (n = 13) underwent WW and served as the control arm. Blinding was maintained for the examining physicians and laboratory staff, but not for the patients. All participants self-rated their experiences of gastric pain and bloating at the beginning and conclusion of the four-week treatment period. Additionally, serum levels of pepsinogen I (PGI) and pepsinogen II (PGII) were measured at these time points. Results Supplementation with probiotics significantly outperformed WW in reducing subjective gastric pain and bloating. This effect was consistent across both tested dosages, with no significant differences observed. However, only high-dose probiotics led to a statistically significant decrease in PGII levels and an increase in the PGI/PGII ratio after the four-week study period, a result not observed with low-dose probiotics. Conclusions Oral administration of S. boulardii and E. faecium demonstrated potential efficacy in reducing gastric pain and bloating symptoms in APs with CNG, as evidenced by statistically significant symptom improvement compared to the control group that did not receive the probiotic supplementation. Notably, high-dose probiotics resulted in a significant increase in the PGI/PGII ratio, indicating potential long-term cytoprotective effects on the gastric mucosa.

Recent Trends and Advancements in the Diagnosis and Management of Gastric Cancer

Gastric cancer is an enigmatic malignancy that has recently been shown to be increasing in incidence globally. There has been recent progress in emerging technologies for the diagnosis and treatment of the disease. Improvements in non-invasive diagnostic techniques with serological tests and biomarkers have led to decreased use of invasive procedures such as endoscopy. A multidisciplinary approach is used to treat gastric cancer, with recent significant advancements in systemic therapies used in combination with cytotoxic chemotherapies. New therapeutic targets have been identified and clinical trials are taking place to assess their efficacy and safety. In this review, we provide an overview of the current and emerging treatment strategies and diagnostic techniques for gastric cancer.

Diagnostic performances of pepsinogens and gastrin-17 for atrophic gastritis and gastric cancer in Mongolian subjects

In Mongolia, gastric cancer morbidity and mortality are high, and more than 80 percent of cases are diagnosed at an advanced stage. This study aimed to evaluate pepsinogens (PGIs) and gastrin-17 (G-17) levels and to determine the diagnostic performances for gastric cancer and chronic atrophic gastritis among Mongolian individuals. We enrolled a total of 120 subjects, including gastric cancer (40), atrophic gastritis (40), and healthy control (40), matched by age (±2) and sex. Pepsinogen I (PGI), Pepsinogen II (PGII), G-17, and H. pylori IgG levels were measured using GastroPanel ELISA kit (Biohit, Helsinki, Finland). Also, PGI to PGII ratio (PGR) was calculated. For atrophic gastritis, when the optimal cut-off value of PGI was ≤75.07 ng/ml, the sensitivity and specificity were 75% and 50%, respectively; when the optimal cut-off value of PGR was ≤6.25, sensitivity and specificity were 85% and 44.7%, respectively. For gastric cancer, when the optimal cut-off value of PGI was ≤35.25 ng/ml, the sensitivity and specificity were 47.2% and 86.8%, respectively; when the optimal cut-off value of PGR was ≤5.27, sensitivity and specificity were 75% and 60.5%, respectively. Combinations of biomarkers with risk factors could improve diagnostic accuracy (AUC for atrophic gastritis 74.8, 95% CI 64.0–85.7, p<0.001; AUC for gastric cancer 75.5, 95% CI 64.2–86.8, p<0.001). PGI, PGR biomarkers combined with the risk of age, family history of gastric cancer, and previous gastric disease could not be an alternative test for upper endoscopy but might be a supportive method which is identifying individuals at medium- and high risk of gastric cancer and precancerous lesions who may need upper endoscopy.

Serum pepsinogen: A potential non-invasive screening method for moderate and severe atrophic gastritis among an asian population

Background

Serum pepsinogen has been approved and used widely as an effective biomarker in diagnosis of atrophic gastritis and gastric cancer; however, its validity and appropriate cut-off values vary among different populations. This study aimed to initially assess the diagnostic value of the serum pepsinogen in diagnosis of moderate and severe atrophic gastritis for Vietnamese population.

Materials and methods

A cross-sectional study enrolled 273 participants from June 2008 to November 2019. All participants underwent a gastroscopy procedure and three tests including serum PG test, pathology test, and Hp-Igg Elisa test. The Kimura-Takemoto classification and OLGA system were used to classify the mild versus moderate-severe atrophic gastritis. Receiver Operating Characteristic curve was used to assess the value of PGI, PGII and PGR.

Results

Based on Kimura-Takemoto classification, the AUC of PGI and PGR was 0.635 (p = 0.008, 95% CI 0.554–0.716) and 0.766 (p < 0.001, 95% CI 0.676–0.857) respectively. The best cut-off values were PGI ≤69.0 and PGR ≤4.6 (sensitivity: 73%, specificity: 83.9%, positive predictive value: 41.5%, negative predictive value: 95.2%, accuracy: 82.4%). According to the OLGA system, the AUC of PGI and PGR was 0.612 (p = 0.004, 95% CI 0.540–0.684) and 0.689 (p < 0.001, 95% CI 0.621–0.758) respectively. The best cut-off values were PGI ≤63.5 and PGR ≤5.2 (sensitivity: 49.4%, specificity: 82.1%, positive predictive value: 52.1%, negative predictive value: 80.5%, accuracy: 72.9%).

Conclusions

The serum pepsinogen II and pepsinogen I/II ratio had reliable diagnostic value for screening of moderate and severe atrophic gastritis among Vietnamese population. Further research was recommended to focus on larger scale to improve the diagnostic yield and to continue finding the cut-off values for diagnosis of gastric cancer among Vietnamese population.

•

The validity and appropriate cut-off values of serum pepsinogen vary among different populations.

•

In Vietnamese population, based on Kimura-Takemoto classification, the best cut-off values were PGI ≤69.0 and PGR ≤4.6.

•

According to the OLGA system, the best cut-off values were PGI ≤63.5 and PGR ≤5.2.

•

The serum pepsinogen II and pepsinogen I/II ratio had reliable diagnostic value for screening of moderate and severe atrophic gastritis among Vietnamese population.

Pepsinogen II in gastritis and Helicobacter pylori infection

BACKGROUND AND AIM

In the gastric mucosa, pepsinogen II (PgII) is produced/secreted by glands in the mucus-secreting antral and cardia compartments, but also by the chief cells and the oxyntic glands. Increasing PgII serum levels are associated with the whole spectrum of gastric inflammatory diseases, including gastritis induced by Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori). This review critically addresses the clinical value of PgII serology for assessing gastric mucosal inflammation, and as a marker of H. pylori status, in both H. pylori-positive patients and after eradication therapy.

RESULTS

A search in PubMed/Scopus records yielded 39 out of 1190 published scientific studies meeting the selection criteria for this study. In the studies considered, PgII levels were significantly associated with non-atrophic gastric inflammatory lesions (p-values: 0.025-0.0001). H. pylori-positive patients had significantly higher PgII levels than H. pylori-negative individuals (p-values: 0.o5-0.0001). While a significant drop in serum PgII levels is consistently reported in H. pylori-eradicated patients (p-values: from 0.05 to 0.0001), inconsistencies in the related negative and positive predictive values significantly lower the clinical reliability of PgII testing by comparison with other available non-invasive tests.

CONCLUSIONS

PgII serology may provide clinically useful information on gastric inflammatory diseases, particularly if they are non-atrophic. PgII serology is inconsistent, however, for the purposes of distinguishing patients whose H. pylori eradication therapy is successful from those who remain infected.

Clinical Value of Combined Detection of Serum sTim-3 and Pepsinogen for Gastric Cancer Diagnosis

Purpose

The present study aimed to evaluate the clinical value of the combined detection of soluble T cell immunoglobulinand mucin domain molecule 3 (sTim-3) and pepsinogen (PG) in sera for gastric cancer (GC) diagnosis.

Patients and Methods

The double antibody sandwich method was used to establish a highly sensitive time-resolved fluorescence immunoassay for the detection of sTim-3. Serum sTim-3, PGI, and PGII levels in 149 GC patients (123 first-diagnosis GC patients and 26 post-GC patients), 81 patients with benign gastric disease (BGD), and 73 healthy controls were quantitatively detected. The clinical diagnostic value of the combined detection of sTim-3 and PG in GC was analyzed.

Results

Serum sTim-3 levels in GC (20.41 ± 9.55 ng/mL) and BGD (16.50 ± 9.76 ng/mL) patients were significantly higher (P < 0.001) than those in healthy controls (9.22 ± 3.40 ng/mL). Combined detection of sTim-3 and PGI/PGII (AUC: 0.9330, sensitivity: 86.44%, and specificity: 91.78%) showed a high diagnostic value for GC. When the level of PGI/PGII was less than 12.11 and that of sTim-3 was greater than 14.30 ng/mL, the positive rate of the control group was reduced to 0%, and the positive detection rate of GC was 54.47%. In addition, in post-operative patients, serum sTim-3 levels in the recurrence group (33.56 ± 4.91 ng/mL) were significantly higher than those in the no recurrence group (11.95 ± 5.16 ng/mL).

Conclusion

sTim-3 levels in BGD and GC sera were significantly higher than those in the control group sera. Additionally, sTim-3 serum levels can predict recurrence in post-operative patients. Compared with PG alone, the combined detection of serum PG and sTim-3 can significantly improve the detection sensitivity and specificity of BGD and GC.

Application of serum pepsinogen and carbohydrate antigen 72-4 (CA72-4) combined with gastrin-17 (G-17) detection in the screening, diagnosis, and evaluation of early gastric cancer

Background

Gastric cancer is a common malignant tumor. The aim of the present study was to analyze the application value of serum pepsinogen (PG), carbohydrate antigen 72-4 (CA72-4), and gastrin-17 (G-17) detection in the screening, diagnosis, and evaluation of early gastric cancer.

Methods

In total, 122 patients with gastric cancer treated in our hospital from January 2018 to January 2021 were selected as the gastric cancer group and subdivided into the early gastric cancer (group A) and advanced gastric cancer (group B) groups. Sixty-five patients with benign gastric disease treated in the same hospital during the same period were selected as the control group, and 122 healthy people who underwent physical examination during the same period were allocated to the control group. The differences in the levels of G-17, PGI, PGII, PGI/PGII, and CA72-4 were compared; receiver-operating characteristic curves were drawn; and the efficacy of different factors in the diagnosis of early gastric cancer was calculated.

Results

G-17, PGI, and PGI/PGII levels in the gastric cancer group were significantly lower than those in the healthy group, and CA72-4 was significantly higher than that in the healthy group (P<0.05), but there was no significant difference in PGII between the 2 groups (P>0.05). G-17, PGI, and PGI/PGII levels in groups A and B were significantly lower than those in the control group. CA72-4 in groups A and B was significantly higher than that of the control group, and was highest in group B (P<0.05). The areas under the curve (AUC) of G-17, PGI, PGI/PGII, and CA72-4 were 0.671, 0.726, 0.769, and 0.602, respectively, and the AUC of combined detection was 0.883, which was significantly higher than that of single detection.

Conclusions

Serum PG, CA72-4 combined with G-17 detection has high sensitivity and specificity in the screening and diagnosis of early gastric cancer, and has high clinical application value.

Preliminary Study on Reference Interval of Serum Pepsinogen in Healthy Subjects

OBJECTIVE

This study determined the reference interval of pepsinogen (PG) of healthy people in the local region to provide a basis for early screening of gastric cancer.

METHODS

Among the healthy people who underwent a physical examination in our hospital from January 2020 to December 2020, 2568 subjects were selected based on the relevant screening criteria. Their serum PG I and II levels and PG I:PG II ratio were determined by chemiluminescent microparticle immunoassay (CIMA), and the results were statistically analyzed. Finally, according to document CLSI-C28-A3, the PG reference interval of the local region was determined.

RESULTS

The PG I and II levels of the males in all age groups were higher than those of the females in the corresponding age groups, and the differences were statistically significant (P < 0.05). However, the differences in the PG I:PG II ratio between the genders in the different age groups were not statistically significant (P > 0.05). The PG I and II levels increased with age in both men and women, while the PG I:PG II ratio was not correlated with age in either gender.

CONCLUSION

The PG reference interval of the local region was initially determined as providing a reliable reference basis for clinical treatment.