Improving risk-stratification of rheumatoid arthritis patients for interstitial lung disease

Rheumatoid arthritis extra-articular lung disease: new insights on pathogenesis and experimental drugs

INTRODUCTION

Pulmonary involvement is one of the most common extra-articular manifestations of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), a systemic inflammatory disease characterized by joint swelling and tenderness. All lung compartments can be interested in the course of RA, including parenchyma, airways, and, more rarely, pleura and vasculature.

AREAS COVERED

The aim of this paper is to review the main RA lung manifestations, focusing on pathogenesis, clinical and therapeutic issues of RA-related interstitial lung disease (ILD). Despite an increasing number of studies in the last years, pathogenesis of RA-ILD remains largely debated and the treatment of RA patients with lung involvement is still challenging in these patients.

EXPERT OPINION

Management of RA-ILD is largely based on expert-opinion. Due to the broad clinical manifestations, including both joints and pulmonary involvement, multidisciplinary discussion, including rheumatologist and pulmonologist, is essential, not only for diagnosis, but also to evaluate the best therapeutic approach and follow-up. In fact, the coexistence of different lung manifestations may influence the treatment response and safety. The identification of biomarkers and risk-factors for an early identification of RA patients at risk of developing ILD remains a need that still needs to be fulfilled, and that will require further investigation in the next years.

Multidimensional biomarker approach integrating tumor markers, inflammatory indicators, and disease activity indicators may improve prediction of rheumatoid arthritis-associated interstitial lung disease

INTRODUCTION

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) often leads to interstitial lung disease (ILD), significantly affecting patient outcomes. This study explored the diagnostic accuracy of a multi-biomarker approach to offer a more efficient and accessible diagnostic strategy for RA-associated ILD (RA-ILD).

METHODS

Patients diagnosed with RA, with or without ILD, at Beijing Tiantan Hospital from October 2019 to October 2023 were analyzed. A total of 125 RA patients were included, with 76 diagnosed with RA-ILD. The study focused on three categories of indicators: tumor markers, inflammatory indicators, and disease activity measures. The heatmap correlation analysis was employed to analyze the correlation among these indicators. Logistic regression was used to determine odds ratios (OR) for indicators linked to RA-ILD risk. Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was employed to evaluate the diagnostic potential of these indicators for RA-ILD.

RESULTS

The results of logistic regression analysis showed that tumor markers (carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9), carbohydrate antigen 125 (CA125), and cytokeratin 19 fragment (CYFRA21-1)), as well as inflammatory indicators (neutrophil, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet, C-reactive protein (CRP)) and disease activity measures (disease activity score-28-CRP (DAS28-CRP), rheumatoid factor (RF), and anti-cyclic peptide containing citrulline (anti-CCP)), were significantly associated with RA-ILD. The correlation coefficients among these indicators were relatively low. Notably, the combination indicator 4, which integrated the aforementioned three categories of biomarkers, demonstrated improved diagnostic accuracy with an AUC of 0.857.

CONCLUSION

The study demonstrated that combining tumor markers, inflammatory indicators, and disease activity measures significantly enhanced the prediction of RA-ILD. Key Points • Multidimensional strategy: Integrated tumor markers, inflammatory indicators, and disease activity measures to enhance early detection of rheumatoid arthritis-associated interstitial lung disease (RA-ILD). • Diagnostic accuracy: Employed heatmap correlation and logistic regression, identifying significant associations and improving diagnostic accuracy with a multidimensional biomarker combination. • Superior performance: The combined multidimensional biomarker strategy demonstrated higher diagnostic precision compared to individual or dual-category indicators. • Clinical relevance: Offers a promising, accessible approach for early detection of RA-ILD in clinical settings, potentially improving patient outcomes.

Targeting Progression in Pulmonary Fibrosis: An Overview of Underlying Mechanisms, Molecular Biomarkers, and Therapeutic Intervention

Interstitial lung diseases comprise a heterogenous range of diffuse lung disorders, potentially resulting in pulmonary fibrosis. While idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis has been recognized as the paradigm of a progressive fibrosing interstitial lung disease, other conditions with a progressive fibrosing phenotype characterized by a significant deterioration of the lung function may lead to a burden of significant symptoms, a reduced quality of life, and increased mortality, despite treatment. There is now evidence indicating that some common underlying biological mechanisms can be shared among different chronic fibrosing disorders; therefore, different biomarkers for disease-activity monitoring and prognostic assessment are under evaluation. Thus, understanding the common pathways that induce the progression of pulmonary fibrosis, comprehending the diversity of these diseases, and identifying new molecular markers and potential therapeutic targets remain highly crucial assignments. The purpose of this review is to examine the main pathological mechanisms regulating the progression of fibrosis in interstitial lung diseases and to provide an overview of potential biomarker and therapeutic options for patients with progressive pulmonary fibrosis.

Does a window of opportunity for rheumatoid arthritis-associated interstitial lung disease exist?

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is an autoimmune disease characterized by chronic inflammatory synovitis, eventually leading to joint destruction. Remarkable advancements in the emergence of molecular targeted therapies and the treatment strategy based on treat-to-target have made it possible for patients to lead their daily lives without disabilities. Specifically, early diagnosis and appropriate treatment without missing a 'window of opportunity' are crucial for improving joint outcomes. On the other hand, interstitial lung disease (ILD) is an extra-articular complication of RA and has an impact on life prognosis. Importantly, it has become evident that achieving remission of arthritis is critical not only for joint outcomes but also to prevent the irreversible progression of pulmonary fibrosis in RA-ILD. Therefore, a 'window of opportunity' may exist not only for joints but also for RA-ILD. However, within RA-ILD, there are cases that progress from an NSIP pattern or airway involvement to a UIP pattern, while there are cases without progression, suggesting that their disease behavior may be diverse. Thus, accumulating evidence is necessary to accurately determine the disease behavior of RA-ILD. This review provides an overview of clinical and radiological features and treatment strategies for RA-ILD, incorporating the latest findings.

Identification, Monitoring, and Management of Rheumatoid Arthritis-Associated Interstitial Lung Disease

Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is a frequent complication of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) that is associated with a significant increase in mortality. Several risk factors for the development of ILD in patients with RA have been identified, but ILD can still develop in the absence of these risk factors. Screening tools for RA-ILD are required to facilitate early detection of RA-ILD. Close monitoring of patients with RA-ILD for progression is crucial to enable timely implementation of treatment strategies to improve outcomes. Patients with RA are commonly treated with immunomodulatory therapies, although their efficacy in slowing the progression of RA-ILD remains the subject of debate. Clinical trials have shown that antifibrotic therapies slow decline in lung function in patients with progressive fibrosing ILDs, including patients with RA-ILD. The management of patients with RA-ILD should be based on multidisciplinary evaluation of the severity and progression of their ILD and the activity of their articular disease. Close collaboration between rheumatologists and pulmonologists is essential to optimize patient care.

Prognostic factors affecting respiratory-related death in patients with rheumatoid arthritis complicated by interstitial lung disease: An ANSWER cohort study

The aim of this multi-centre retrospective study was to clarify the prognostic factors for respiratory-related death in patients with interstitial lung disease (ILD) complicated rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Patient background data, treatment regimen, and disease activity indicators of RA and ILD at baseline, 6 months after the diagnosis of ILD, and at the last follow-up visit were extracted. A total of 312 patients with RA-ILD (17 patients who died from respiratory-related causes and 295 survivors) were included. Patients who died from respiratory-related causes had an older median age, a higher proportion of being male, and a higher anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibody positivity rate than survivors (p = .0001, .038, and .016, respectively); they also had significantly higher baseline serum levels of Krebs von den Lungen-6 (KL-6) than survivors (p = .013). Patients who died from respiratory-related causes showed significantly greater changes in serum KL-6 levels between the 6-month time point and the last visit [ΔKL-6 (6 months - last)] than survivors (p = .011). Multivariate analysis showed that the ΔKL-6 (6 months - last) corrected by disease duration was a predictor of respiratory-disease-related death in patients with RA-ILD (p < .0001). Long-term increase in serum KL-6 levels is associated with respiratory-disease related death in patients with RA-ILD.

Patient-level factors predictive of interstitial lung disease in rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic review

Objective Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is an important cause of mortality in some patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Patient-level factors may predict which patients with RA are at the highest risk of developing ILD and are therefore candidates for screening for this complication of the underlying disease.Methods A systematic literature review was performed using PubMed, Embase and Scopus over a 10-year period up to July 2021. Publications reporting patient-level factors in patients with RA with and without ILD that were assessed before development of ILD (or were unchanged over time and therefore could be extrapolated to before development of ILD) were retrieved for assessment of evidence. Genetic variation in MUC5B and treatment with methotrexate were not included in the assessment of evidence because these factors have already been widely investigated for association with ILD.Results We found consistent associations of age, sex, smoking status and autoantibodies with development of ILD. For biomarkers such as Krebs von den Lungen 6, which have been shown to be diagnostic for ILD, there were no publications meeting criteria for this study.Conclusions This analysis provides an initial step in the identification of patient-level factors for potential development of a risk algorithm to identify patients with RA who may be candidates for screening for ILD. The findings represent a useful basis for future research leading to an improved understanding of the disease course and improved care for patients with RA at risk of development and progression of ILD.

Artificial Intelligence and laboratory data in rheumatic diseases

Artificial intelligence (AI)-based medical technologies are rapidly evolving into actionable solutions for clinical practice. Machine learning (ML) algorithms can process increasing amounts of laboratory data such as gene expression immunophenotyping data and biomarkers. In recent years, the analysis of ML has become particularly useful for the study of complex chronic diseases, such as rheumatic diseases, heterogenous conditions with multiple triggers. Numerous studies have used ML to classify patients and improve diagnosis, to stratify the risk and determine disease subtypes, as well as to discover biomarkers and gene signatures. This review aims to provide examples of ML models for specific rheumatic diseases using laboratory data and some insights into relevant strengths and limitations. A better understanding and future application of these analytical strategies could facilitate the development of precision medicine for rheumatic patients.

CCL18 as a Biomarker of Interstitial Lung Disease (ILD) and Progressive Fibrosing ILD in Patients with Idiopathic Inflammatory Myopathies

OBJECTIVES

To assess CCL18 and OX40L as biomarkers of interstitial lung disease (ILD) and/or progressive fibrosing (PF-) ILD in idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIMs).

METHODS

Patients with IIMs seen in our center from July 2020 to March 2021 were consecutively enrolled. ILD was detected by high-resolution CT. CCL18 and OX40L serum levels were measured by validated ELISA assays in 93 patients and 35 controls. At the 2-year follow-up, PF-ILD was evaluated according to the INBUILD criteria.

RESULTS

ILD was diagnosed in 50 (53.7%) patients. CCL18 serum levels were higher in IIMs patients vs. controls (232.9 [IQR 134.7-399.07] vs. 48.4 [29.9-147.5], p < 0.0001), with no difference for OX40L. IIMs-ILD patients exhibited higher levels of CCL18 than those without ILD (306.8 [190.8-520.5] vs. 162 [75.4-255.8], p < 0.0001). High CCL18 serum levels were independently associated with IIMs-ILD diagnosis. At follow-up, 22/50 (44%) patients developed a PF-ILD. Patients who developed PF-ILD had higher CCL18 serum levels than non-progressors (511 [307-958.7] vs. 207.1 [149.3-381.7], p < 0.0001). Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed CCL18 as the only independent predictor of PF-ILD (OR 1.006 [1.002-1.011], p = 0.005).

CONCLUSIONS

Although in a relatively small sample, our data suggest that CCL18 is a useful biomarker in IIMs-ILD, particularly in the early identification of patients at risk of developing PF-ILD.

Peripheral Blood Biomarkers for Rheumatoid Arthritis-Associated Interstitial Lung Disease: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Biomarkers have been proposed as tools to aid in the identification and prognostication of interstitial lung disease (ILD) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). We performed a systematic review of studies evaluating peripheral blood biomarkers and their association with RA-ILD and its prognosis.

METHODS

Medline, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and Scopus were queried for relevant studies, with the final search update on July 12, 2021. We included studies evaluating peripheral blood biomarkers for the identification and/or prognostication of RA-ILD, extracting the performance of individual biomarkers for identifying RA-ILD, and predicting prognosis. Modified versions of the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 and the Quality in Prognosis Studies tools were used for quality assessment.

RESULTS

Seventy studies met eligibility criteria. Study and patient characteristics, analytical methods, strength and consistency of associations, and study quality were heterogeneous. A total of 92 biomarkers were positively associated and 12 were negatively associated with RA-ILD among patients with RA in one or more report. Only a small number of biomarkers were evaluated in multiple cohorts using adjusted analyses. Biomarkers most strongly associated with RA-ILD overlapped with those identified for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Few prognostic biomarkers of RA-ILD were identified.

CONCLUSION

Several peripheral blood biomarkers are associated with the presence of RA-ILD, but few have been assessed in multivariable models, have been externally validated, have discriminated RA-ILD from other lung disease, or have prognosticated the disease course. High-quality studies investigating and validating peripheral biomarkers in RA-ILD are needed before they can be employed in clinical care.

Proteomics: Potential techniques for discovering the pathogenesis of connective tissue diseases-interstitial lung disease

Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is one of the most serious lung complications of connective tissue disease (CTD). The application of proteomics in the past decade has revealed that various proteins are involved in the pathogenesis of each subtype of CTD-ILD through different pathways, providing novel ideas to study pathological mechanisms and clinical biomarkers. On this basis, a multidimensional diagnosis or prediction model is established. This paper reviews the results of proteomic detection of different subtypes of CTD-ILD and discusses the role of some differentially expressed proteins in the development of pulmonary fibrosis and their potential clinical applications.

Rationale and the Protocol for the Rheumatoid Arthritis-Associated ILD: Screening and Evaluation in High-Risk Patients (RAISE) Study

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is chronic inflammatory joint disease with a prevalence of up to 1%. Various extra-articular manifestations have been reported, including rheumatoid arthritis-associated interstitial lung disease (RA-ILD). RA-ILD contributes to significant morbidity and is a leading cause of death in patients with RA. Detection of lung involvement is therefore important. However, the prevalence of RA-ILD is not well known and varies among different studies depending on the methods of detection. Multiple clinical risk factors and novel biomarkers have been explored. To evaluate the usefulness of these predictors and to evaluate the burden of interstitial lung disease (ILD) among patients with RA, we designed a study (RAISE, Rheumatoid Arthritis-associated ILD: Screening and Evaluation in high-risk patients) to assess the prevalence of RA-ILD among RA patients with high risk, and to identify potential clinical and biochemical markers associated with the condition.

SER-SEPAR recommendations for the management of rheumatoid arthritis-related interstitial lung disease. Part 1: Epidemiology, risk factors and prognosis

OBJECTIVE

To develop multidisciplinary recommendations to improve the management of rheumatoid arthritis-related interstitial lung disease (RA-ILD).

METHODS

Clinical research questions relevant to the objective of the document were identified by a panel of rheumatologists and pneumologists selected based on their experience in the field. Systematic reviews of the available evidence were conducted, and evidence was graded according to the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN) criteria. Specific recommendations were made.

RESULTS

Six PICO questions were selected, three of which analysed the incidence and prevalence of RA-ILD, associated risk factors, and predictors of progression and mortality. A total of 6 specific recommendations on these topics, structured by question, were formulated based on the evidence found and/or expert consensus.

CONCLUSIONS

We present the first official SER-SEPAR document with specific recommendations for RA-ILD management developed to resolve some common clinical questions and facilitate decision-making for patients.

Pathogenesis, clinical features, and treatment strategy for rheumatoid arthritis-associated interstitial lung disease

Rheumatoid arthritis is an autoimmune disease that primarily affects the joints. The emergence of highly effective anti-rheumatic drugs such as biologic agents and janus kinase inhibitors has dramatically improved the management of the disease by preventing irreversible joint destruction and disability. This disease can manifest the serious extra-articular involvements including interstitial lung disease, which has the significant impact on the patients' morbidity and mortality. However, treatment strategy specific for rheumatoid arthritis-associated interstitial lung disease (RA-ILD) has not been yet established. Therefore, understanding the pathogenesis and clinical features of RA-ILD is critical to provide the better management and improve the prognosis of the patients. Accumulation of evidence suggest that it is essentially important to achieve remission or at least low disease activity of arthritis to prevent new emergence, progression, or acute exacerbation of RA-ILD. RA-ILD patients frequently show high titers of autoantibodies including rheumatoid factor and anti-CCP antibody, and the excessive formation of tertiary lymphoid organs is found in the local affected lungs, indicating the adaptive immune response as a key pathogenic inducer. In this regard, non-TNF inhibitors targeting adaptive immune responses such as abatacept and rituximab were reported to be promising for the stabilization and improvement of RA-ILD. Nintedanib, an anti-fibrotic agent, was shown to be effective for reducing the decline of forced vital capacity in RA-ILD. In this review, we summarized the current evidence in the pathogenesis, clinical features, and treatments for RA-ILD and provide future prospects.

High-titer rheumatoid factor seropositivity predicts mediastinal lymphadenopathy and mortality in rheumatoid arthritis-related interstitial lung disease

Rheumatoid arthritis-related interstitial lung disease (RA-ILD) is a common connective tissue disease-related ILD (CTD-ILD) associated with high morbidity and mortality. Although rheumatoid factor (RF) seropositivity is a risk factor for developing RA-ILD, the relationship between RF seropositivity, mediastinal lymph node (MLN) features, and disease progression is unknown. We aimed to determine if high-titer RF seropositivity predicted MLN features, lung function impairment, and mortality in RA-ILD. In this retrospective cohort study, we identified patients in the University of Chicago ILD registry with RA-ILD. We compared demographic characteristics, serologic data, MLN size, count and location, and pulmonary function over 36 months among patients who had high-titer RF seropositivity (≥ 60 IU/ml) and those who did not. Survival analysis was performed using Cox regression modeling. Amongst 294 patients with CTD-ILD, available chest computed tomography (CT) imaging and serologic data, we identified 70 patients with RA-ILD. Compared to RA-ILD patients with low-titer RF, RA-ILD patients with high-titer RF had lower baseline forced vital capacity (71% vs. 63%; P = 0.045), elevated anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide titer (122 vs. 201; P = 0.001), CT honeycombing (50% vs. 80%; P = 0.008), and higher number of MLN ≥ 10 mm (36% vs. 76%; P = 0.005). Lung function decline over 36 months did not differ between groups. Primary outcomes of death or lung transplant occurred more frequently in the high-titer RF group (HR 2.8; 95% CI 1.1-6.8; P = 0.028). High-titer RF seropositivity was associated with MLN enlargement, CT honeycombing, and decreased transplant-free survival. RF titer may be a useful prognostic marker for stratifying patients by pulmonary disease activity and mortality risk.

The value of KL-6 in the diagnosis and assessment of interstitial lung disease

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the value of Krebs von den Lungen-6 (KL-6) in the diagnosis and activity assessment of interstitial lung disease (ILD).

METHODS

The data of 69 ILD patients admitted to our hospital from January 2018 to January 2020 were analyzed retrospectively, and they were included in the ILD group. In addition, 69 patients with connective tissue disease (CTD) admitted to our hospital during the same period were selected and included in the non-ILD (NILD) group. The lung function, pulmonary imaging scores, and KL-6 expression levels were compared between the two groups. The patients in the ILD group were divided into two subgroups: the inactive group and the active group. The pulmonary function, pulmonary imaging scores, and the KL-6 expression levels of the patients in the two subgroups were compared. The value of KL-6 in the diagnosis and the ILD activity evaluation were analyzed.

RESULTS

The FEV1, FVC, and DLCO levels in the LID group were lower than they were in the NLID group (P<0.05). The LUS and Warrick scores in the LID group were higher than they were in the NLID group (P<0.05). The FEV1, FVC, and DLCO levels in the active group were lower than they were in the inactive group (P<0.05). The LUS and Warrick scores in the active group were higher than they were in the NLID group (P<0.05). The patients' serum KL-6 levels in the ILD group were higher than they were in the NILD group (P<0.05), and the patients' serum KL-6 levels in the ILD group were higher than they were in the inactive group (P<0.05). The Youden's index of serum KL-6 for the diagnosis of ILD was 421.775 U/ml and the sensitivity and specificity of the serum KL-6 were 91.304% and 95.652%, respectively, showing a high diagnostic value (P<0.05). The Youden's index of the serum KL-6 levels for the evaluation of the ILD activity was den Lungen-6 (KL-, with a sensitivity of 60.976% and a specificity of 100%, showing a moderate evaluation value (P<0.05).

CONCLUSION

KL-6 has a high value in the diagnosis of interstitial lung disease, and a moderate value in the assessment of interstitial lung disease activity.

The role of lung ultrasound B-lines and serum KL-6 in the screening and follow-up of rheumatoid arthritis patients for an identification of interstitial lung disease: review of the literature, proposal for a preliminary algorithm, and clinical application to cases

Screening and follow-up of interstitial lung disease associated with rheumatoid arthritis (RA-ILD) is a challenge in clinical practice. In fact, the majority of RA-ILD patients are asymptomatic and optimal tools for early screening and regular follow-up are lacking. Furthermore, some patients may remain oligosymptomatic despite significant radiological abnormalities. In RA-ILD, usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP) is the most frequent radiological and pathological pattern, associated with a poor prognosis and a high risk to develop acute exacerbations and infections. If RA-ILD can be identified early, there may be an opportunity for an early treatment and close follow-up that might delay ILD progression and improve the long-term outcome.In connective tissue disease-associated interstitial lung disease (CTD-ILD), lung ultrasound (LUS) with the assessment of B-lines and serum Krebs von den Lungen-6 antigen (KL-6) has been recognized as sensitive biomarkers for the early detection of ILD. B-line number and serum KL-6 level were found to correlate with high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT), pulmonary function tests (PFTs), and other clinical parameters in systemic sclerosis-associated ILD (SSc-ILD). Recently, the significant correlation between B-lines and KL-6, two non-ionizing and non-invasive biomarkers, was demonstrated. Hence, the combined use of LUS and KL-6 to screen and follow up ILD in RA patients might be useful in clinical practice in addition to existing tools. Herein, we review relevant literature to support this concept, propose a preliminary screening algorithm, and present 2 cases where the algorithm was used.

Biomarkers for interstitial lung disease and acute-onset diffuse interstitial lung disease in rheumatoid arthritis

Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is frequently a complication of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) as an extra-articular manifestation which has a poor prognosis. Acute-onset diffuse ILD (AoDILD) occasionally occurs in RA and includes acute exacerbation of ILD, drug-induced ILD, and Pneumocystis pneumonia. AoDILD also confers a poor prognosis in RA. Previously-established biomarkers for ILD include Krebs von den lungen-6 and surfactant protein-D originally defined in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis; the sensitivity of these markers for RA-associated ILD (RA-ILD) is low. Although many studies on ILD markers have been performed in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, only a few validation studies in RA-ILD or AoDILD have been reported. Biomarkers for RA-ILD and AoDILD are thus still required. Recently, genomic, cytokine, antibody, and metabolomic profiles of RA-ILD or AoDILD have been investigated with the aim of improving biomarkers. In this review, we summarize current preliminary data on these potential biomarkers for RA-ILD or AoDILD. The development of biomarkers on RA-ILD has only just begun. When validated, such candidate biomarkers will provide valuable information on pathogenesis, prognosis, and drug responses in RA-ILD in future.

Rheumatoid arthritis related interstitial lung disease

INTRODUCTION

Interstitial lung disease (ILD) represents a frequent extra-articular manifestation of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) deeply impacting both quality of life and overall prognosis. Areas covered: A literature search was performed including PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science. Many retrospective studies investigated the possible risk factors for RA-related ILD (RA-ILD), aiming to identify patients at risk. Among them, males, smokers, positivity of anti-citrullinated peptide antibodies have been associated with RA-ILD, such as some genetic haplotypes. Usual interstitial pneumonia is the histologic and radiologic pattern most frequently observed, followed by nonspecific interstitial pneumonia. Since lung involvement can represent the RA onset, an early differential diagnosis with idiopathic interstitial pneumonia can be difficult or sometimes impossible. High-resolution computed tomography represents the gold standard for ILD diagnosis, while multidisciplinary discussion should be required to assess disease staging, severity and progression.  Expert opinion: Management of RA-ILD patients is challenging due to the lack of evidence-based data regarding both assessment and treatment. Moreover, the high variability of clinical presentation and evolution makes it difficult to establish the correct therapeutic strategy. Currently, multidisciplinary approach, including at least rheumatologists, pulmonologists, and radiologists, is desirable to define therapy and follow-up strategies.

Rheumatoid Arthritis Interstitial Lung Disease: Measuring and Predictive Factors Among Patients Treated in Rehabilitation Clinics at Royal Medical Services

Introduction

Autoimmune diseases have increasing importance in modern medicine and cover increasing areas of medicine including rheumatoid arthritis interstitial lung disease.

Aim

The main aims of this study are to evaluate the association of some autoimmune variables in patients with rheumatoid arthritis interstitial lung disease.

Methods

A retrospective study was conducted from files of patients with rheumatoid arthritis interstitial lung disease. A total of 210 files of intended patients were included in this study. The study was conducted in rehabilitation clinics at Royal Medical Services. Study variables include some demographic variables such as age, and gender; clinical variables such as disease related factors such as duration, diagnostic criteria; predictive factors such as rheumatoid factors, smoking, and MTX treatment. Data were collected and entered into excel spreadsheet to create raw data. The analysis of data was carried out using the software SPSS version 21. Descriptive statistical parameters were used to describe data including means and standard deviations for continuous variables. Frequency and percentages were used to describe categorized variables such as gender. The relationships between study variables were computed using independent T test, and One Way ANOVA test. Significance was determined if α≤ 0.05.

Results

The prevalence of RA-ILD was 3.70%. The study participants were subdivided into two groups according to MTX treatment, non-exposed group and exposed group. There were significant relationships between MTX treatment and study variables including gender, age of (rheumatoid arthritis) RA onset, smoking, and rheumatoid factor (RF). The progression of RA-ILD was impacted by gender, age of (rheumatoid arthritis) RA onset, smoking, rheumatoid factor (RF), and MTX treatment.

Conclusion

Patients with RA and RA-ILD follow similar clinical characteristics in other studies except MTX treatment, but this can't be generalized because of small number of RA-ILD patients.

Serum Krebs von den Lungen-6 and lung ultrasound B lines as potential diagnostic and prognostic factors for rheumatoid arthritis-associated interstitial lung disease

INTRODUCTION

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA)-associated interstitial lung disease (ILD) (RA-ILD) is a serious systemic RA manifestation with high mortality that needs proper, accurate, and sensitive assessment tools.

OBJECTIVES

Firstly, evaluate serum Krebs von den Lungen-6 (KL-6) levels and lung ultrasound B lines (LUS B lines) score in RA-ILD correlating them with the severity of ILD assessed by high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) and pulmonary function tests (PFTs). Secondly, determine cut-off values for LUS and KL-6 in RA-ILD assessment and outcome prediction.

METHODS

A case-control study included seventy-five RA-ILD patients with an equal number of matched RA patients without ILD. Clinical assessment includes DAS-28 and PFTs, laboratory assessment of serum KL-6 by latex-enhanced immunoturbidimetric assay, and radiological evaluation of ILD using semiquantitative CT grade and LUS B lines.

RESULTS

RA-ILD patients had significantly higher serum KL6 compared to those without ILD (1025.5 ± 419.6 vs. 237.5 ± 51.9, p ≤ 0.001). Serum KL6 was positively correlated with HRCT and LUS scores (r = 0.93, r = 0.97, respectively) with negative correlation with FVC% and FEV1% (r = - 0.93, r = - 0.91, respectively). LUS was positively correlated with KL6 and HRCT (r = 0.97, r = 0.944, respectively) while, negatively correlated with PFTs. Cut-off values of KL6 and LUS were 277.5 U/ml and < 5.5, with AUC 0.878 and 1, sensitivity 86.7% and 100%, and specificity 88% and 100%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The non-invasive, radiation-free LUS with a score < 5.5 combined with serum KL6 could be helpful for RA-ILD assessment correlating with HRCT and disease severity. Serum KL6 combined with LUS is important new and potential prognostic factor predicting poor outcomes in RA-ILD. Further large-scale, multi-center, and prospective studies are needed to confirm these findings.

KEY POINTS

• Combination of the non-invasive, radiation-free LUS with a score < 5.5 and serum KL6 levels of 277.5 U/ml is recommended as prognostic tools for RA-ILD. • Easily obtainable tests such as serum KL-6, inflammatory markers, and LUS are sensitive for assessing RA-ILD and the risk of poor outcomes in patients with RA-ILD. • RA-ILD patients with higher KL6 levels, higher LUS scores had a poor prognosis with short survival. • LUS B lines could be used as the first imaging tool for the evaluation of RA-ILD decreasing the risk of HRCT radiation exposure in asymptomatic or mild RA-ILD patients.