Cost-effective analysis of childhood malaria vaccination in endemic hotspots of Bangladesh

Knowledge and acceptance of malaria vaccine among parents of under-five children of malaria endemic areas in Bangladesh: A cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND

Malaria exists as an endemic in many countries including Bangladesh and the malaria vaccine is not yet available here. The study aimed to assess the level of knowledge and acceptance of the malaria vaccination among the parents of children under the age of five in Bangladesh's malaria-endemic areas and the sociodemographic, behavioural, and household factors associated with the acceptance and knowledge of the malaria vaccine.

METHODS

From January to March 2022, a cross-sectional study was conducted in all five malaria-endemic districts of Bangladesh, involving 405 parents of children under the age of 5 who met the inclusion criteria. Multiple logistic regression was used to analyze the factor affecting parents' acceptance and knowledge of malaria vaccination in children under five and other variables.

RESULTS

Majority (54%) of the respondents were mothers. Almost half (49%) of the respondents were aged between 26 and 35 years old and around 90% were from rural areas. A small portion (20%) of the participants were housewives and 46% of them completed primary education. Overall, 70% of the study participants reported that they would accept malaria vaccination independently. About one-fourth (25%) heard about the malaria vaccine and 48% of them mentioned health professionals as the source of information. Knowledge of malaria vaccination was found associated with residence, income, and family size. Acceptance and knowledge were both associated with residence, education, occupation, income, and family size. In a multivariable analysis, housing structure, house wall, house window, knowledge of malaria, testing for malaria, and being diagnosed with malaria were all associated with knowledge of and acceptance of getting vaccinated against malaria.

CONCLUSIONS

The present study highlights the necessity of creating awareness of malaria vaccines in epidemic areas of Bangladesh. This study offers crucial data to develop a policy for a novel malaria vaccine, supporting its adoption in Bangladesh.

PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION

This study was based on interviews. The interviewees were recruited as public representatives from the malaria-endemic area to assist us in building an understanding of knowledge and acceptance of the malaria vaccine among parents of under-five children in Bangladesh.

Predictors of malaria vaccine uptake among children 6–24 months in the Kassena Nankana Municipality in the Upper East Region of Ghana

Background

The Malaria Vaccine Implementation Programme (MVIP) coordinates the routine implementation of the RTS,S vaccine pilot in strategically selected locations in Malawi, Kenya, and Ghana. The pilot programme thoroughly assesses the programmatic feasibility of administering the four doses of the RTS,S vaccine. It will also assess the impact on malaria morbidity and mortality, as well as monitor and detect the vaccine's safety for routine usage. The malaria vaccine was introduced into Ghana's routine vaccination programme in May 2019 in seven regions, comprising 42 districts, including Kassena Nankana Municipal in the Upper East region of Ghana. Therefore, this study seeks to assess the predictors of the malaria vaccine uptake in children 6 to 24 months in the Kassena Nankana Municipal in Ghana.

Methods

The survey used a cross-sectional study design and included 422 mothers/caregivers with children aged 6 to 24 months from the Kassena Nankana Municipality. WHO cluster survey questionnaire was altered for use in data gathering with caregivers as respondents. The Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 25.0 (for descriptive statistics) and Stata version 13 (for calculating odds ratios) were used to analyse the data.

Results

The findings depict that, the mean age of respondents for the study was 27 ± 5 years and average age of children was 15 ± 8 months. The study found that coverage uptake was high (94%). Chi-square and odds ratios testing revealed statistically significant associations between health service factors and vaccine uptake: education on malaria vaccine cOR(Cl); 9.69(3.496–25.425), (P < 0.001), giving caregivers the option to accept malaria vaccine cOR(Cl); 7.04 (2.759–17.476), (P < 0.001). Confidence in the efficiency of the vaccination was found to have a statistically significant association with malaria vaccine uptake (P < 0.005) and (p < 0.001) for ‘somewhat confidence’ and ‘not confidence at all’, respectively. Attitude of health workers was found to be significant predictor of malaria vaccine uptake (P < 0.003).

Conclusion

Malaria vaccine uptake was high among the study population in the municipality; however, dose four uptake coverage by age two was low. This indicates that mothers/caregivers did not understand the notion of immunization throughout the second year of life. As a result, it is recommended that the municipality raise awareness about immunization services among mothers/caregivers beyond year one in order to improve performance and reduce the risk of disease outbreaks in the municipality.

Insights from modelling malaria vaccines for policy decisions: the focus on RTS,S

Mathematical models are increasingly used to inform decisions throughout product development pathways from pre-clinical studies to country implementation of novel health interventions. This review illustrates the utility of simulation approaches by reviewing the literature on malaria vaccine modelling, with a focus on its link to the development of policy guidance for the first licensed product, RTS,S/AS01. The main contributions of modelling studies have been in inferring the mechanism of action and efficacy profile of RTS,S; to predicting the public health impact; and economic modelling mainly comprising cost-effectiveness analysis. The value of both product-specific and generic modelling of vaccines is highlighted.

Current Status and the Epidemiology of Malaria in the Middle East Region and Beyond

Vector-borne parasitic infectious diseases are important causes of morbidity and mortality globally. Malaria is one of the most common vector-borne parasitic infection and is caused by five Plasmodium species, namely P. falciparum, P. vivax, P. ovale, P. malariae, and P. knowlesi. Epidemiologically, differences in the patterns of malaria cases, causative agent, disease severity, antimicrobial resistance, and mortality exist across diverse geographical regions. The world witnessed 229 million malaria cases which resulted in 409,000 deaths in 2019 alone. Although malaria cases are reported from 87 countries globally, Africa bears the brunt of these infections and deaths as nearly 94% of total malaria cases and deaths occur in this continent, particularly in sub-Saharan Africa. Most of the Middle East Region countries are malaria-free as no indigenous cases of infection have been described in recent years. However, imported cases of malaria continue to occur as some of these countries. Indeed, the six Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) countries have large expatriate population originating from malaria endemic countries. In this review, the current status and epidemiology of malaria in the Middle East Region countries and other malaria-endemic countries that are home to a large migrant workforce being employed in Middle East Region countries are discussed.