Four weeks versus six weeks of ampicillin plus ceftriaxone in Enterococcus faecalis native valve endocarditis: A prospective cohort study

Is It Useful to Repeat Blood Cultures in Endocarditis Patients? A Critical Appraisal

BACKGROUND

Previous guidelines for endocarditis have suggested repeating blood cultures until they become negative, with limited evidence.

METHODS

Literature reviews were conducted (1) on the incidence of persistent bacteremia and association with outcome and (2) on timing of valve culture negativization to examine the claim for prolongation of antibiotic therapy starting from negative blood cultures.

RESULTS

Persistent bacteremia and fever may be present in the first 3 days of endocarditis, despite treatment, and are more common in Staphylococcus (especially MRSA) and Enterococcus species. Persistent bacteremia (48-72 h), persistent infection (day 7), and new onset septic shock are related and predict in-hospital mortality. It is, however, persistent infection at day 7 and septic shock that primarily determine the infectious course of endocarditis, and not persistent bacteremia. Valve cultures at surgery become negative in most cases (>85-90%) after 14-21 days of antibiotic therapy, with no calculated benefit for prolonging therapy after 21 days.

CONCLUSIONS

Persistent infection at 7 days after appropriate antibiotic therapy is a better key event for prognosis then positive or negative blood cultures at 48-72 h. Therapy prolongation from the day of negative blood cultures is not reasonable. There is no need to survey blood cultures in endocarditis patients after starting therapy.

State-of-the-Art Review: Persistent Enterococcal Bacteremia

Persistent enterococcal bacteremia is a commonly encountered and morbid syndrome without a strong evidence base for optimal management practices. Here we highlight reports on the epidemiology of enterococcal bacteremia to better describe and define persistent enterococcal bacteremia, discuss factors specific to Enterococcus species that may contribute to persistent infections, and describe a measured approach to diagnostic and therapeutic strategies for patients with these frequently complicated infections. The diagnosis of persistent enterococcal bacteremia is typically clinically evident in the setting of repeatedly positive blood culture results; instead, the challenge is to determine in an accurate, cost-effective, and minimally invasive manner whether any underlying nidus of infection (eg, endocarditis or undrained abscess) is present and contributing to the persistent bacteremia. Clinical outcomes for patients with persistent enterococcal bacteremia remain suboptimal. Beyond addressing host immune status if relevant and pursuing source control for all patients, management decisions primarily involve the selection of the proper antimicrobial agent(s). Options for antimicrobial therapy are often limited in the setting of intrinsic and acquired antimicrobial resistance among enterococcal clinical isolates. The synergistic benefit of combination antimicrobial therapy has been demonstrated for enterococcal endocarditis, but it is not clear at present whether a similar approach will provide any clinical benefit to some or all patients with persistent enterococcal bacteremia.

Treatment of Enterococcus faecalis Infective Endocarditis: A Continuing Challenge

Today, Enterococcus faecalis is one of the main causes of infective endocarditis in the world, generally affecting an elderly and fragile population, with a high mortality rate. Enterococci are partially resistant to many commonly used antimicrobial agents such as penicillin and ampicillin, as well as high-level resistance to most cephalosporins and sometimes carbapenems, because of low-affinity penicillin-binding proteins, that lead to an unacceptable number of therapeutic failures with monotherapy. For many years, the synergistic combination of penicillins and aminoglycosides has been the cornerstone of treatment, but the emergence of strains with high resistance to aminoglycosides led to the search for new alternatives, like dual beta-lactam therapy. The development of multi-drug resistant strains of Enterococcus faecium is a matter of considerable concern due to its probable spread to E. faecalis and have necessitated the search of new guidelines with the combination of daptomycin, fosfomycin or tigecycline. Some of them have scarce clinical experience and others are still under investigation and will be analyzed in this review. In addition, the need for prolonged treatment (6–8 weeks) to avoid relapses has forced to the consideration of other viable options as outpatient parenteral strategies, long-acting administrations with the new lipoglycopeptides (dalbavancin or oritavancin), and sequential oral treatments, which will also be discussed.

Impact of Enterococcus faecalis Endocarditis Treatment on Risk of Relapse

BACKGROUND

Enterococcus faecalis infective endocarditis (EFIE) is characterized by a higher frequency of relapses than other infective endocarditis. The role of the treatment on its occurrence remains poorly understood. The aim of this study was to investigate whether the antibiotic regimen could impact the risk of relapse in EFIE.

MATERIALS

This was a multicenter retrospective study of patients diagnosed with definite EFIE between 2015 and 2019 in 14 French hospitals. The primary endpoint was the occurrence of relapses within the year following endocarditis diagnosis. As death was a competing risk for relapse, Fine and Gray models were used for studying risk factors and impact of treatment.

RESULTS

Of the 279 patients included, 83 (29.7%) received the amoxicillin-gentamicin (A-G) combination, 114 (40.9%) amoxicillin-ceftriaxone (A-C), 63 (22.6%) A-G and A-C (A-G/A-C) sequentially, 9 (3.2%) amoxicillin (A), and 10 received other treatments. One-year-relapse rate was 9.3% (26 patients). Relapse occurred after a median delay of 107 days from EFIE diagnosis; 6 occurred after 6 months, and 6 were diagnosed by blood cultures in asymptomatic patients. In multivariate analysis, surgery during treatment was a protective factor against one-year relapse and death.The cumulative incidence of relapse 1 year after endocarditis was 46.2% for patients treated with amoxicillin, 13.4% with A-G, 14.7% with A-C, and 4.3% with A-G/A-C (P≥.05 in multivariate analysis).

CONCLUSIONS

Relapses after treatment of EFIE are frequent, frequently asymptomatic, and may occur more than 6 months after the initial episode.

A retrospective study of Enterococcus faecalis infective endocarditis: comparison of clinical characteristics and outcomes associated with treatment

Introduction

A synergistic antibiotic combination of a penicillin and gentamicin (AG) or ceftriaxone (AC) is used in the management of Enterococcus faecalis infective endocarditis (EFIE). We compare the treatment outcomes between AG and AC, including low and high dose ceftriaxone (1 and 2 g 12 hourly).

Methods

A retrospective cohort study of patients treated for EFIE at single tertiary centre (2012–2019). Outcome measures examined were 90- and 180-day mortality, treatment associated adverse events and relapse of bacteraemia (within 1 year).

Results

39 patients were enrolled [61.6% given (AC) (n = 24), 24% received ACL (n = 10) and 34% received ACN (n = 14)], 38.4% received AG (n = 15). We noted a difference in the mortality outcomes at 90 and 180 days between those treated with AG and AC overall (6.7% and 33.3%, respectively) although this did not reach statistical significance (P = 0.114, P = 0.061). No significant difference was noted between these groups in incidence of relapsed bacteraemia with two cases noted in the AC cohort (8.3%, 2/24) and none observed (0/15) in the AG cohort (P = 0.662, P = 0.414). A greater number of adverse events was observed in the AG group (11/15, 73.3%) compared to the overall AC group (6/24, 25.0%) (P = 0.009), with no difference between the high and low dose ceftriaxone groups (P = 0.05).

Conclusion

Combination treatment of EFIE with AC is associated with a reduced number of adverse events in comparison to AG groups. Although increased mortality was observed in the AC group, this did not reach statistical significance, and reflects the greater comorbidities and reduced capacity for surgical source control in this cohort.

Infective Endocarditis: New Challenges in a Classic Disease

Infective endocarditis is a relatively rare, but deadly infection, with an overall mortality of around 20% in most series. Clinical manifestations have evolved in response to significant epidemiological shifts in industrialized nations, with a move toward a nosocomial or health-care-related pattern, in older patients, with more episodes associated with prostheses and/or intravascular electronic devices and a predominance of staphylococcal and enterococcal etiology.Diagnosis is often challenging and is based on the conjunction of clinical, microbiological, and imaging information, with notable progress in recent years in the accuracy of echocardiographic data, coupled with the recent emergence of other useful imaging techniques such as cardiac computed tomography (CT) and nuclear medicine tools, particularly ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission/CT.The choice of an appropriate treatment for each specific case is complex, both in terms of the selection of the appropriate agent and doses and durations of therapy as well as the possibility of using combined bactericidal antibiotic regimens in the initial phase and finalizing treatment at home in patients with good evolution with outpatient oral or parenteral antimicrobial therapies programs. A relevant proportion of patients will also require valve surgery during the active phase of treatment, the timing of which is extremely difficult to define. For all the above, the management of infective endocarditis requires a close collaboration of multidisciplinary endocarditis teams.

Ampicillin plus ceftriaxone therapy against Enterococcus faecalis endocarditis: A case report, guidelines considerations, and literature review

Enterococcus faecalis infective endocarditis (EFIE) continues to be a very serious disease, showing considerable morbidity and mortality rates which are influenced by the spread of multi-drug resistant strains occurred in the last decades. Although aminoglycosides were considered the treatment of choice of EIFE, in recent years several studies have investigated alternative therapeutic approaches, including combinations of beta-lactams, mainly because of the aminoglycoside-renowned nephrotoxicity and the widespread development of high-level aminoglycosides resistance (HLAR). In this scenario, we reported a case involving a prosthetic valve infective endocarditis caused by an aminoglycoside-resistant E. faecalis strain which was successfully treated with ampicillin plus ceftriaxone despite the presence of artificial heart valve and the patient’s severe clinical conditions.

Ampicillin Plus Ceftriaxone Regimen against Enterococcus faecalis Endocarditis: A Literature Review

Enterococcus faecalis infective endocarditis (EFIE) continues to represent a potentially fatal infectious disease characterized by elevated morbidity and mortality. Despite advances in antimicrobial therapy, changing demographics and the reduced availability of useful antibiotics combined with the dissemination of multi-drug resistant strains, the mortality rate remained unchanged in the last decades. Nowadays, optimizing the antibiotic regimen is still of paramount importance. Historically, aminoglycosides were considered as a cornerstone for treatment even though their use is associated with a high risk of kidney failure. It is against this background that, in recent years, several studies have been carried in order to assess the validity of alternative therapeutic approaches, including combinations of beta-lactams, that, acting synergistically, have yielded useful results in different clinical settings. In this scenario, we searched and critically report clinical studies assessing the efficacy and safety of double beta-lactam therapy in treating EFIE.

Current Challenges in the Management of Infective Endocarditis

Infective endocarditis is a relatively rare, but deadly cause of sepsis, with an overall mortality ranging from 20 to 25% in most series. Although the classic clinical classification into syndromes of acute or subacute endocarditis have not completely lost their usefulness, current clinical forms have changed according to the profound epidemiological changes observed in developed countries. In this review, we aim to address the changing epidemiology of endocarditis, several recent advances in the understanding of the pathophysiology of endocarditis and endocarditis-triggered sepsis, new useful diagnostic tools as well as current concepts in the medical and surgical management of this disease. Given its complexity, the management of infective endocarditis requires the close collaboration of multidisciplinary endocarditis teams that must decide on the diagnostic approach; the appropriate initial treatment in the critical phase; the detection of patients needing surgery and the timing of this intervention; and finally the accurate selection of patients for out-of-hospital treatment, either at home hospitalization or with oral antibiotic treatment.

Clinical Factors Associated with Reinfection versus Relapse in Infective Endocarditis: Prospective Cohort Study

We aimed to identify clinical factors associated with recurrent infective endocarditis (IE) episodes. The clinical characteristics of 2816 consecutive patients with definite IE (January 2008–2018) were compared according to the development of a second episode of IE. A total of 2152 out of 2282 (94.3%) patients, who were discharged alive and followed-up for at least the first year, presented a single episode of IE, whereas 130 patients (5.7%) presented a recurrence; 70 cases (53.8%) were due to other microorganisms (reinfection), and 60 cases (46.2%) were due to the same microorganism causing the first episode. Thirty-eight patients (29.2%), whose recurrence was due to the same microorganism, were diagnosed during the first 6 months of follow-up and were considered relapses. Relapses were associated with nosocomial endocarditis (OR: 2.67 (95% CI: 1.37–5.29)), enterococci (OR: 3.01 (95% CI: 1.51–6.01)), persistent bacteremia (OR: 2.37 (95% CI: 1.05–5.36)), and surgical treatment (OR: 0.23 (0.1–0.53)). On the other hand, episodes of reinfection were more common in patients with chronic liver disease (OR: 3.1 (95% CI: 1.65–5.83)) and prosthetic endocarditis (OR: 1.71 (95% CI: 1.04–2.82)). The clinical factors associated with reinfection and relapse in patients with IE appear to be different. A better understanding of these factors would allow the development of more effective therapeutic strategies.

How do I manage a patient with enterococcal bacteraemia?

BACKGROUND

Enterococcal bacteraemia (EB) is common, particularly in the nosocomial setting, and its management poses a challenge for clinicians and microbiologists.

OBJECTIVES

The aim was to summarize the more relevant features of EB and to provide a practical state-of-the-art on the topics that more directly affect its management.

SOURCES

Pubmed articles from inception to 31 May 2020.

CONTENT

The following topics are covered: epidemiological, clinical and microbiological characteristics and factors associated with prognosis of EB; diagnosis and work-up, including the use of echocardiography to rule out endocarditis; antibiotic management with special focus on antimicrobial resistance and complicated EB; and the role of infectious disease consultation and the use of bundles in EB. In addition, three clinical vignettes are presented to illustrate the practical application of the guidance provided, and major gaps in the current evidence supporting EB management are discussed.

IMPLICATIONS

EB is associated with large burdens of morbidity and mortality, particularly among fragile and immunosuppressed patients presenting complicated bacteraemia due to multidrug-resistant enterococci. Most cases of EB are caused by Enterococcus faecalis, followed by E. faecium. EB often presents as polymicrobial bacteraemia. Rapidly identifying patients at risk of EB is crucial for timely application of diagnostic techniques and empiric therapy. Early alert systems and rapid diagnostic techniques, such as matrix-assisted desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry, especially if used together with infectious disease consultation within bundles, appear to improve management and prognosis of EB. Echocardiography is also key in the work-up of EB and should probably be more extensively used, although its exact indications in EB are still debated. Multidisciplinary approaches are warranted due to the complexity and severity of EB.