Wallis CM. Characterization of data observing
Meloidogyne incognita, Neofusicoccum parvum, and
Xylella fastidiosa infection effects on development of grapevine phenolic compound levels and resistance to subsequent
Neofusicoccum parvum infections.
Data Brief 2024;
54:110301. [PMID:
38524842 PMCID:
PMC10957448 DOI:
10.1016/j.dib.2024.110301]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2023] [Revised: 02/09/2024] [Accepted: 03/04/2024] [Indexed: 03/26/2024] Open
Abstract
Grapevines encounter many different pathogens throughout their lifespans, including the bacterial pathogen Xylella fastidiosa, which causes Pierce's disease that results in vascular occlusion and eventual plant host death, the fungal pathogen Neofusicoccum parvum, which causes stem cankers that kill individual vines and reduce fruit yields, and the root knot nematode Meloidogyne incognita, which destroys root tissues that impacts host vigour. To date, little research has been conducted to examine how one infection could impact subsequent infections by the same or different pathogens despite this is important to ensure healthy vineyards. Therefore, grapevines initially infected with either X. fastidiosa, N. parvum, or M. incognita were subsequently infected with N. parvum eight weeks later to observe developing lesion lengths, which were assessed to determine grapevine resistance to infections. Collected data shows that when prior infections were present, the N. parvum lesions lengths were smaller. This suggests grapevines had induced resistance to combat infections. Further, defence-associated phenolics were measured by high-performance liquid chromatography to determine roles in observed resistance to the secondary N. parvum infections. Data shows that of the different phenolics examined, only stilbenoids were different due to infections, with lowered levels observed in plants that were infected compared with non-infected controls. These data provide insight into how infections by different pathogens could impact grapevine host resistance to new, subsequent pathogen infections.
Collapse