1
|
Torrey EF. Did the human genome project affect research on Schizophrenia? Psychiatry Res 2024; 333:115691. [PMID: 38219345 DOI: 10.1016/j.psychres.2023.115691] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2023] [Revised: 12/15/2023] [Accepted: 12/21/2023] [Indexed: 01/16/2024]
Abstract
The Human Genome Project was undertaken primarily to discover genetic causes and better treatments for human diseases. Schizophrenia was targeted since three of the project`s principal architects had a personal interest and also because, based on family, adoption, and twin studies, schizophrenia was widely believed to be a genetic disorder. Extensive studies using linkage analysis, candidate genes, genome wide association studies [GWAS], copy number variants, exome sequencing and other approaches have failed to identify causal genes. Instead, they identified almost 300 single nucleotide polymorphisms [SNPs] associated with altered risks of developing schizophrenia as well as some rare variants associated with increased risk in a small number of individuals. Risk genes play a role in the clinical expression of most diseases but do not cause the disease in the absence of other factors. Increasingly, observers question whether schizophrenia is strictly a genetic disorder. Beginning in 1996 NIMH began shifting its research resources from clinical studies to basic research based on the promise of the Human Genome Project. Consequently, three decades later NIMH's genetics investment has yielded almost nothing clinically useful for individuals currently affected. It is time to review NIMH`s schizophrenia research portfolio.
Collapse
|
2
|
Liu J, Li Y, Shi R. The 2010-2020 National Natural Science Foundation of China: Radiation Therapy. Curr Med Sci 2022; 42:453-461. [PMID: 35089494 DOI: 10.1007/s11596-022-2531-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2021] [Accepted: 11/07/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study explains the application number and funding rate of oncology projects undertaken by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC), with focus on tumor radiotherapy-related research over the past 11 years. METHODS A stratified analysis was carried out on the application and funding status of tumor radiotherapy studies in different NSFC project categories, different research areas, and different tumor types. Research areas that required specific focus, such as immunology-related radiotherapy, multimodality imaging and radiomics, and post-radiotherapy organ injury, were separately analyzed. RESULTS The status and development trends of various related research fields were studied, and the research results were presented with the support of the NSFC, in order to provide reference for future applications and funding allocations. CONCLUSION The number of applications for funding increases every year. Although the total number of funded projects has also increased every year, the funding rate has decreased year by year. Projects on radiotherapy and immunization have been at the forefront in recent years, and the funding rate for these projects increases yearly.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jun Liu
- Division VII, Department of Health Sciences, National Natural Science Foundation of China, Beijing, 100085, China.,Department of Thoracic Surgery, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, 430062, China
| | - Yang Li
- Division VII, Department of Health Sciences, National Natural Science Foundation of China, Beijing, 100085, China.,Department of Genetics, School of Life Science, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, 230031, China
| | - Rong Shi
- Division VII, Department of Health Sciences, National Natural Science Foundation of China, Beijing, 100085, China.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Torrey EF, Dailey L. What NIMH Should Be Doing. Psychiatr Serv 2022; 73:247-248. [PMID: 35230869 DOI: 10.1176/appi.ps.202100620] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- E Fuller Torrey
- Stanley Medical Research Institute, Rockville, Maryland (Torrey); Treatment Advocacy Center, Arlington, Virginia (Dailey)
| | - Lisa Dailey
- Stanley Medical Research Institute, Rockville, Maryland (Torrey); Treatment Advocacy Center, Arlington, Virginia (Dailey)
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Markowitz JC, Wright JH, Peeters F, Thase ME, Kocsis JH, Sudak DM. The Neglected Role of Psychotherapy for Treatment-Resistant Depression. Am J Psychiatry 2022; 179:90-93. [PMID: 35105164 DOI: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2021.21050535] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- John C Markowitz
- Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons and New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York (Markowitz); Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Louisville, Louisville (Wright); Department of Clinical Psychological Science, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands (Peeters); Department of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia (Thase); Department of Psychiatry, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York (Kocsis); Department of Psychiatry, Drexel University, Philadelphia (Sudak)
| | - Jesse H Wright
- Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons and New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York (Markowitz); Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Louisville, Louisville (Wright); Department of Clinical Psychological Science, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands (Peeters); Department of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia (Thase); Department of Psychiatry, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York (Kocsis); Department of Psychiatry, Drexel University, Philadelphia (Sudak)
| | - Frenk Peeters
- Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons and New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York (Markowitz); Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Louisville, Louisville (Wright); Department of Clinical Psychological Science, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands (Peeters); Department of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia (Thase); Department of Psychiatry, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York (Kocsis); Department of Psychiatry, Drexel University, Philadelphia (Sudak)
| | - Michael E Thase
- Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons and New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York (Markowitz); Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Louisville, Louisville (Wright); Department of Clinical Psychological Science, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands (Peeters); Department of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia (Thase); Department of Psychiatry, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York (Kocsis); Department of Psychiatry, Drexel University, Philadelphia (Sudak)
| | - James H Kocsis
- Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons and New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York (Markowitz); Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Louisville, Louisville (Wright); Department of Clinical Psychological Science, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands (Peeters); Department of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia (Thase); Department of Psychiatry, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York (Kocsis); Department of Psychiatry, Drexel University, Philadelphia (Sudak)
| | - Donna M Sudak
- Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons and New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York (Markowitz); Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Louisville, Louisville (Wright); Department of Clinical Psychological Science, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands (Peeters); Department of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia (Thase); Department of Psychiatry, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York (Kocsis); Department of Psychiatry, Drexel University, Philadelphia (Sudak)
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Knable MB, Torrey EF. Assessment of the 2019 national institute of mental health grant portfolio for bipolar disorder research. J Affect Disord 2022; 296:667. [PMID: 34565597 DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2021.09.044] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2021] [Accepted: 09/11/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Michael B Knable
- Clearview Communities, Frederick, MD, USA; George Washington University Medical School, Washington, DC, USA
| | - E Fuller Torrey
- Stanley Medical Research Institute, Rockville, MD, USA; Uniformed Services University of Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Demblowski LA, Blakely AM, Zeiger MA. An In-Depth Examination of Surgeon-Scientists' NIH-Funded Areas of Research. JOURNAL OF SURGERY AND RESEARCH 2022; 5:541-548. [PMID: 36643765 PMCID: PMC9835206 DOI: 10.26502/jsr.10020254] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/17/2023]
Abstract
Background Few studies have examined which National Institutes of Health (NIH) Institutes or Centers (ICs) provide most of the funding to surgeons, nor examined the specifics of their research focus areas. A better understanding of both the goals of ICs and research focus areas for surgeons may facilitate further alignment of the two. Methods A previously created database of NIH-funded surgeons was queried. To understand trends in funding, total grant cost was calculated for each IC in 2010 and 2020, and distribution of IC funds to each principal investigator (PI) category (surgeons, other physicians, and PhDs without a medical degree) was compared. Finally, total cost for Research Condition and Disease Categorization (RCDC) areas funded to surgeons compared to all of NIH was calculated. Statistical analyses were performed; a two-tailed p value of < 0.05 was considered significant. Results The National Cancer Institute (NCI) awarded the largest percentage of all 2020 surgeon funding, 34.3% ($298.9M). Compared to the other ICs, surgeons held the largest percentage of the National Eye Institute's (NEI) total funding in 2010 and 2020 at 8.7% and 9.0%, respectively. The RCDC super category comprising the most funding for surgeons was health disparities with 14.5% of all surgeon funding, followed by neurology (13.8%) and cancer (11.4%). Surgeons were awarded 10.8% of NIH's transplant-related research, 7.0% of ophthalmology-related research, and 3.4% of cancer-related research in 2020. Conclusions Our study shows surgeons have positioned themselves to examine new and myriad research topics while maintaining a focus on health disparities and cancer-related research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lindsay A Demblowski
- Office of Surgeon Scientists Programs, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Andrew M Blakely
- Surgical Oncology Program, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Martha A Zeiger
- Office of Surgeon Scientists Programs, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|