Extent of arterial calcification by conventional vitamin K antagonist treatment

Association of Oral Anticoagulant Therapy with the Prevalence and Severity of Vascular Calcification among Patients with Atrial Fibrillation: A Cohort Study

Many patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) requiring long-term use of oral anticoagulants (OACs) are at high risk for vascular calcification and anticoagulation therapy with warfarin exacerbate vascular calcification. However, the effect of nonvitamin K agonists on vascular calcification has not been clearly investigated. This study explored the effects of dabigatran etexilate, rivaroxaban, and warfarin on vascular calcification among 1527 patients with AF. Demographics, comorbidities, laboratory test data, medications, and the prevalence and severity of vascular calcification in different vascular beds were compared. After propensity score matching, the incidence of vascular calcification in the rivaroxaban and warfarin group was significantly higher than that in the nonanticoagulant group, while there was no difference between the dabigatran etexilate group and the nonanticoagulant group. Similarly, we found that the rivaroxaban group had more severe calcification in the overall vascular level (P < 0.001), thoracic aorta (P < 0.001), aortic arch (P = 0.001), and left common carotid artery (P = 0.005) than the nonanticoagulant group. In addition, in the left common carotid artery, there was more severe calcification in the rivaroxaban group than that in the dabigatran group (P = 0.005). Our results suggest that rivaroxaban can significantly increase both the incidence and severity of vascular calcification among patients with AF, while dabigatran etexilate has no such effect. Many patients with AF requiring long-term use of OACs are at high risk for vascular calcification. This is the first study to conduct a head-to-head comparison of the effects of dabigatran etexilate and rivaroxaban on vascular calcification. Rivaroxaban, rather than dabigatran etexilate, promotes vascular calcification in patients with AF, providing important implications to aid clinicians in their choice for OAC selection, especially those at high risk for vascular calcification.

Rivaroxaban vs Vitamin K Antagonist in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation and Advanced Chronic Kidney Disease

Background

Treatment with vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) has been linked to worsening of kidney function in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF).

Objectives

XARENO (Factor XA-inhibition in RENal patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation Observational registry; NCT02663076) is a prospective observational study comparing adverse kidney outcomes in patients with AF and advanced chronic kidney disease receiving rivaroxaban or VKA.

Methods

Patients with AF and an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of 15 to 49 mL/min/1.73 m2 were included. Blinded adjudicated outcome analysis evaluated adverse kidney outcomes (a composite of eGFR decline to <15 mL/min/1.73 m2, need for chronic kidney replacement therapy, or development of acute kidney injury). A composite net clinical benefit outcome (stroke or systemic embolism, major bleeding, myocardial infarction, acute coronary syndrome, or cardiovascular death) was also analyzed. HRs with 95% CIs were calculated using propensity score overlap weighting Cox regression.

Results

There were 1,455 patients (764 rivaroxaban; 691 VKA; mean age 78 years; 44% females). The mean eGFR was 37.1 ± 9.0 in those receiving rivaroxaban and 36.4 ± 10.1 mL/min/1.73 m2 in those receiving VKA. After a median follow-up of 2.1 years, rivaroxaban was associated with less adverse kidney outcomes (HR: 0.62; 95% CI: 0.43-0.88) and all-cause death (HR: 0.76, 95% CI: 0.59-0.98). No significant differences were observed in net clinical benefit.

Conclusions

In patients with AF and advanced chronic kidney disease, those receiving rivaroxaban had less adverse kidney events and lower all-cause mortality compared to those receiving VKA, supporting the use of rivaroxaban in this high-risk group of patients.

Plaque Progression Differences Between Apixaban and Rivaroxaban in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation Measured With Cardiac Computed Tomography and Plaque Quantification

BACKGROUND

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have been associated with less calcification and coronary plaque progression than warfarin. Whether different DOACs have different effects on coronary plaque burden and progression is not known. We compared the 12-month effects of apixaban and rivaroxaban on plaque characteristics and vascular morphology in patients with atrial fibrillation through quantitative cardiac computed tomographic angiography.

STUDY QUESTION

In patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation using apixaban or rivaroxaban, are there differences in plaque quantification and progression measured with cardiac computed tomography?

STUDY DESIGN

This is a post hoc analysis of 2 paired prospective, single-centered, randomized, open-label trials with blinded adjudication of results. In total, 74 patients were prospectively randomized in parallel trials: 29 to apixaban (2.5-5 mg BID) and 45 to rivaroxaban (20 mg QD). Serial cardiac computed tomographic angiography was performed at baseline and 52 weeks.

MEASURES AND OUTCOMES

Comprehensive whole-heart analysis was performed for differences in the progression of percent atheroma volume (PAV), calcified plaque (CP) PAV, noncalcified plaque (NCP) PAV, positive arterial remodeling (PR) ≥1.10, and high-risk plaque (Cleerly Labs, New York, NY).

RESULTS

Both groups had progression of all 3 plaque types (apixaban: CP 8.7 mm 3 , NCP 69.7 mm 3 , and LD-NCP 27.2 mm 3 ; rivaroxaban: CP 22.9 mm 3 , NCP 66.3 mm 3 , and LD-NCP 11.0 mm 3 ) and a total annual plaque PAV change (apixaban: PAV 1.5%, PAV-CP 0.12%, and PAV-NCP 0.92%; rivaroxaban: PAV 2.1%, PAV-CP 0.46%, and PAV-NCP 1.40%). There was significantly lower PAV-CP progression in the apixaban group compared with the rivaroxaban group (0.12% vs. 0.46% P = 0.02). High-risk plaque characteristics showed a significant change in PR of apixaban versus rivaroxaban ( P = 0.01). When the propensity score weighting model is applied, only PR changes are statistically significant ( P = 0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

In both groups, there is progression of all types of plaque. There was a significant difference between apixaban and rivaroxaban on coronary calcification, with significantly lower calcific plaque progression in the apixaban group, and change in positive remodeling. With weighted modeling, only PR changes are statistically significant between the 2 DOACs.

The impact of anticoagulation therapy on kidney function in patients with atrial fibrillation and chronic kidney disease

INTRODUCTION

Atrial fibrillation (AF) and chronic kidney disease (CKD) are closely related. These diseases share common risk factors and are associated with increased risk of thromboembolic events. Choosing the appropriate oral anticoagulant therapy (OAC) in patients with AF and CKD is challenging. Deterioration of renal function is common in patients with AF treated with OACs, although not all OACs affect the kidneys equally.

AREAS COVERED

In this review, we aim to summarize the current knowledge of the prevention of thromboembolic events in patients with AF and CKD, focusing on the impact of specific OAC agents on renal function.

EXPERT OPINION

Consideration of OAC use is mandatory in patients with AF and CKD who are at increased risk of stroke or systemic embolism. Available evidence suggests that the use of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) is associated with slower deterioration of renal function in comparison to Vitamin K antagonists (VKAs). Hence, a NOAC should be used in preference to VKAs in all NOAC-eligible patients with AF and CKD. Regarding patients with end-stage renal dysfunction and those on dialysis or renal replacement therapy, the use of NOAC should be considered in line with locally relevant formal recommendations.

Inflammatory, Metabolic, and Coagulation Effects on Medial Arterial Calcification in Patients with Peripheral Arterial Disease

Calcium deposits in the vessel wall in the form of hydroxyapatite can accumulate in the intimal layer, as in atherosclerotic plaque, but also in the medial layer, as in medial arterial calcification (MAC) or medial Möenckeberg sclerosis. Once considered a passive, degenerative process, MAC has recently been shown to be an active process with a complex but tightly regulated pathophysiology. Atherosclerosis and MAC represent distinct clinical entities that correlate in different ways with conventional cardiovascular risk factors. As both entities coexist in the vast majority of patients, it is difficult to estimate the relative contribution of specific risk factors to their development. MAC is strongly associated with age, diabetes mellitus, and chronic kidney disease. Given the complexity of MAC pathophysiology, it is expected that a variety of different factors and signaling pathways may be involved in the development and progression of the disease. In this article, we focus on metabolic factors, primarily hyperphosphatemia and hyperglycemia, and a wide range of possible mechanisms by which they might contribute to the development and progression of MAC. In addition, we provide insight into possible mechanisms by which inflammatory and coagulation factors are involved in vascular calcification processes. A better understanding of the complexity of MAC and the mechanisms involved in its development is essential for the development of potential preventive and therapeutic strategies.

Vitamin K antagonists and cardiovascular calcification: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Many patients treated with Vitamin K antagonists (VKA) for anticoagulation have concomitant vascular or valvular calcification. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate a hypothesis that vascular and valvular calcification is a side-effect of VKA treatment.

Methods

We conducted a systematic literature search to identify studies that reported vascular or valvular calcification in patients treated with VKA. The associations between VKA use and calcification were analyzed with random-effects inverse variance models and reported as odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). In addition, univariate meta-regression analyses were utilized to identify any effect moderators.

Results

Thirty-five studies were included (45,757 patients; 6,251 VKA users). The median follow-up was 2.3 years [interquartile range (IQR) of 1.2–4.0]; age 66.2 ± 3.6 years (mean ± SD); the majority of participants were males [77% (IQR: 72–95%)]. VKA use was associated with an increased OR for coronary artery calcification [1.21 (1.08, 1.36), p = 0.001], moderated by the duration of treatment [meta-regression coefficient B of 0.08 (0.03, 0.13), p = 0.0005]. Extra-coronary calcification affecting the aorta, carotid artery, breast artery, and arteries of lower extremities, was also increased in VKA treated patients [1.86 (1.43, 2.42), p < 0.00001] and moderated by the author-reported statistical adjustments of the effect estimates [B: −0.63 (−1.19, −0.08), p = 0.016]. The effect of VKA on the aortic valve calcification was significant [3.07 (1.90, 4.96), p < 0.00001]; however, these studies suffered from a high risk of publication bias.

Conclusion

Vascular and valvular calcification are potential side effects of VKA. The clinical significance of these side effects on cardiovascular outcomes deserves further investigation.

Put out the fire: The pleiotropic anti-inflammatory action of non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants

Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) should be the preferred anticoagulant strategy for preventing ischemic stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) at increased thromboembolic risk and for treating deep venous thromboembolism (DVT) in the general population. Beyond their inhibiting action on the activated factor X (FXa) or thrombin (FIIa), NOACs showed some pleiotropic anti-inflammatory effects. The present review aimed to describe the role of FXa and FIIa in the inflammation pathway and the potential anti-inflammatory effects of NOACs.

New evidence of direct oral anticoagulation therapy on cardiac valve calcifications, renal preservation and inflammatory modulation

BACKGROUND

Rivaroxaban is a direct inhibitor of activated Factor X (FXa), an anti-inflammatory protein exerting a protective effect on the cardiac valve and vascular endothelium. We compare the effect of Warfarin and Rivaroxaban on inflammation biomarkers and their contribution to heart valve calcification progression and renal preservation in a population of atrial fibrillation (AF) patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) stage 3b - 4.

METHODS

This was an observational, multicenter, prospective study enrolling 347 consecutive CKD stage 3b - 4 patients newly diagnosed with AF: 247 were treated with Rivaroxaban and 100 with Warfarin. Every 12 months, we measured creatinine levels and cardiac valve calcification via standard trans-thoracic echocardiogram, while plasma levels of inflammatory mediators were quantified by ELISA at baseline and after 24 months.

RESULTS

Over a follow-up of 24 months, long-term treatment with Rivaroxaban was associated with a significative reduction of cytokines. Patients treated with Rivaroxaban experienced a more frequent stabilization/regression of valve calcifications comparing with patients treated with Warfarin. Rivaroxaban use was related with an improvement in kidney function in 87.4% of patients, while in those treated with Warfarin was reported a worsening of renal clearance in 98% of cases. Patients taking Rivaroxaban experienced lower adverse events (3.2% vs 49%, p-value <0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that Rivaroxaban compared to Warfarin is associated with lower levels of serum markers of inflammation. The inhibition of FXa may exert an anti-inflammatory effect contributing to reduce the risk of cardiac valve calcification progression and worsening of renal function.

Vascular Calcification in Chronic Kidney Disease: Distinct Features of Pathogenesis and Clinical Implication

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is associated with a higher prevalence of vascular calcification (VC) and cardiovascular disease. VC in CKD patients showed different pathophysiological features from those of the general population. The pathogenesis of VC in CKD is a highly organized process, and prior studies have suggested that patients with CKD have their own specific contributors to the phenotypic change of vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs), including uremic toxins, CKD-mineral and bone disease (CKD-MBD), inflammation, and oxidative stress. For the diagnosis and monitoring of VC in CKD, several imaging modalities, including plain radiography, ultrasound, and computed tomography have been utilized. VC in CKD patients has distinct clinical features and implications. CKD patients revealed a more intense and more prevalent calcification on the intimal and medial layers, whereas intimal calcification is predominantly observed in the general population. While a higher VC score is clearly associated with a higher risk of all-cause mortality and cardiovascular events, a greater VC score in CKD patients does not fully reflect the burden of atherosclerosis, because they have more calcification at equal volumes of atheromatous plaques. The primary goal of VC treatment in CKD is the prevention of VC progression, and the main management is to control the biochemical components of CKD-MBD. Cinacalcet and non-calcium-containing phosphate binders are the mainstay of VC prevention in CKD-MBD management. VC in patients with CKD is an ongoing area of research and is expected to advance soon.

Gut Microbiome, Functional Food, Atherosclerosis, and Vascular Calcifications-Is There a Missing Link?

The gut microbiome is represented by the genome of all microorganisms (symbiotic, potential pathogens, or pathogens) residing in the intestine. These ecological communities are involved in almost all metabolic diseases and cardiovascular diseases are not excluded. Atherosclerosis, with a continuously increasing incidence in recent years, is the leading cause of coronary heart disease and stroke by plaque rupture and intraplaque hemorrhage. Vascular calcification, a process very much alike with osteogenesis, is considered to be a marker of advanced atherosclerosis. New evidence, suggesting the role of dietary intake influence on the diversity of the gut microbiome in the development of vascular calcifications, is highly debated. Gut microbiota can metabolize choline, phosphatidylcholine, and L-carnitine and produce vasculotoxic metabolites, such as trimethylamine-N-oxide (TMAO), a proatherogenic metabolite. This review article aims to discuss the latest research about how probiotics and the correction of diet is impacting the gut microbiota and its metabolites in the atherosclerotic process and vascular calcification. Further studies could create the premises for interventions in the microbiome as future primary tools in the prevention of atherosclerotic plaque and vascular calcifications.

Off-target effects of oral anticoagulants - vascular effects of vitamin K antagonist and non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant dabigatran etexilate

INTRODUCTION

Vitamin K antagonists (VKA) and non-vitamin K oral antagonist anticoagulants (NOAC) are used in the clinic to reduce risk of thrombosis. However, they also exhibit vascular off-target effects. The aim of this study is to compare VKA and NOAC on atherosclerosis progression and calcification in an experimental setup.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Female Apoe-/- mice (age 12 weeks) were fed Western-type diet as control or supplemented with dabigatran etexilate or warfarin for 6 or 18 weeks. Vascular calcification was measured in whole aortic arches using µCT and [18 F]-NaF. Atherosclerotic burden was assessed by (immuno)histochemistry. Additionally, in vitro effects of warfarin, thrombin, and dabigatran on primary vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMC) were assessed.

RESULTS

Short-term treatment with warfarin promoted formation of atherosclerotic lesions with a pro-inflammatory phenotype, and more rapid plaque progression compared with control and dabigatran. In contrast, dabigatran significantly reduced plaque progression compared with control. Long-term warfarin treatment significantly increased both presence and activity of plaque calcification compared with control and dabigatran. Calcification induced by warfarin treatment was accompanied by increased presence of uncarboxylated matrix Gla protein. In vitro, both warfarin and thrombin significantly increased VSMC oxidative stress and extracellular vesicle release, which was prevented by dabigatran.

CONCLUSION

Warfarin aggravates atherosclerotic disease activity, increasing plaque inflammation, active calcification, and plaque progression. Dabigatran lacks undesired vascular side effects and reveals beneficial effects on atherosclerosis progression and calcification. The choice of anticoagulation impacts atherosclerotic disease by differential off target effect. Future clinical studies should test whether this beneficial effect also applies to patients.

The Effects of Warfarin and Direct Oral Anticoagulants on Systemic Vascular Calcification: A Review

Warfarin has been utilized for decades as an effective anticoagulant in patients with a history of strong risk factors for venous thromboembolism (VTE). Established adverse effects include bleeding, skin necrosis, teratogenicity during pregnancy, cholesterol embolization, and nephropathy. One of the lesser-known long-term side effects of warfarin is an increase in systemic arterial calcification. This is significant due to the association between vascular calcification and cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have gained prominence in recent years, as they require less frequent monitoring and have a superior side effect profile to warfarin, specifically in relation to major bleeding. The cost and lack of data for DOACs in some disease processes have precluded universal use. Within the last four years, retrospective cohort studies, observational studies, and randomized trials have shown, through different imaging modalities, that multiple DOACs are associated with slower progression of vascular calcification than warfarin. This review highlights the pathophysiology and mechanisms behind vascular calcification due to warfarin and compares the effect of warfarin and DOACs on systemic vasculature.