Implantable cardioverter defibrillator therapy is cost effective for primary prevention patients in Taiwan: An analysis from the Improve SCA trial

A cost-effectiveness analysis of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy sudden cardiac death risk algorithms for implantable cardioverter defibrillator decision-making

AIMS

To conduct a contemporary cost-effectiveness analysis examining the use of implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) for primary prevention in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM).

METHODS

A discrete-time Markov model was used to determine the cost-effectiveness of different ICD decision-making rules for implantation. Several scenarios were investigated, including the reference scenario of implantation rates according to observed real-world practice. A 12-year time horizon with an annual cycle length was used. Transition probabilities used in the model were obtained using Bayesian analysis. The study has been reported according to the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards checklist.

RESULTS

Using a 5-year SCD risk threshold of 6% was cheaper than current practice and has marginally better total quality adjusted life years (QALYs). This is the most cost-effective of the options considered, with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of £834 per QALY. Sensitivity analyses highlighted that this decision is largely driven by what health-related quality of life (HRQL) is attributed to ICD patients and time horizon.

CONCLUSION

We present a timely new perspective on HCM-ICD cost-effectiveness, using methods reflecting real-world practice. While we have shown that a 6% 5-year SCD risk cut-off provides the best cohort stratification to aid ICD decision-making, this will also be influenced by the particular values of costs and HRQL for subgroups or at a local level. The process of explicitly demonstrating the main factors, which drive conclusions from such an analysis will help to inform shared decision-making in this complex area for all stakeholders concerned.

Cost effectiveness of implantable cardioverter defibrillators for 1.5 primary prevention of sudden cardiac arrest in China: an analysis from the Improve SCA study

OBJECTIVES

Implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICDs) for primary prevention (PP) of sudden cardiac arrest (SCA) is underutilized in developing countries. The Improve SCA study has identified a subset of 1.5 primary prevention (1.5PP) patients with a higher risk of SCA and a significant mortality benefit from ICD therapy. From the perspective of China's healthcare system, we evaluated the cost-effectiveness of ICD therapy vs. no ICD therapy among 1.5PP patients with a view to informing clinical and policy decisions.

METHODS

A published Markov model was adjusted and verified to simulate the course of the disease and describe different health states of 1.5PP patients. The patient characteristics, mortality, utility and complication estimates were obtained from the Improve SCA study and other literature. Cost inputs were sourced from government tender prices, medical service prices and clinical experts' surveys in 9 Chinese public hospitals. For both ICD and no ICD therapy, the total medical costs and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) were modelled over a lifetime horizon and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was calculated. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed to assess the uncertainty of the model parameters. We used the willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold recommended by China Guidelines for Pharmacoeconomic Evaluations, one to three times China's GDP per capita (CNY85,698-CNY257,094) in 2022 Chinese Yuan.

RESULTS

The incremental cost effectiveness ratio (ICER) of ICD therapy compared to no ICD therapy is 139,652 CNY/QALY, which is about 1-2 times China's GDP per capita. The probability that ICD therapy is cost effective was 92.1%. Results from sensitivity analysis supported the findings of the base case.

CONCLUSIONS

ICD therapy compared to no ICD therapy is cost-effective for the 1.5PP patients in China.

Cost-Effectiveness of Cardioverter-Defibrillator Implantation in Kazakhstan

ABSTRACT

Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. The implementation of effective technologies such as Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) for patients at risk of sudden cardiac death requires additional health system resources.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the economic effectiveness of ICD in comparison with conservative tactics for preventing life-threatening rhythm disturbances in Kazakhstan.

METHODS

A Markov model was built with a time horizon of 35 years. Mortality and utility data were obtained from the available literature. The economic parameters of the model are based on the approved tariffs for medical services in Kazakhstan and clinical protocols. Following WHO recommendations, a willingness to pay threshold of three times gross domestic product per capita was used to assess cost-effectiveness. A discount rate of 3.5% was applied to both costs and benefits. To deal with parameter uncertainties and to provide robust analysis, a probabilistic sensitivity analysis was performed, randomly varying all inputs subject to uncertainty assuming a statistical distribution.

RESULTS

The total costs in the primary prevention (PP) group by ICD implantation and in the control group were 8,903,786 tenges and 3,194,414 tenges, respectively. The discounted total quality-adjusted life-years saved (QALYs) in the ICD and control groups were 6.48 and 4.98, respectively. The indicator of incremental cost-effectiveness ratio amounted to3791604 tenge, which is below the willingness to pay threshold and indicates the cost-effectiveness of using ICD as a PP strategy in patients with sudden cardiac death risk factors in the health care of Kazakhstan.

CONCLUSION

The ICD for the primary prevention of the development of life-threatening rhythm disturbances and sudden cardiac death is a cost-effective health technology from the position of a payer in the health care system of Kazakhstan.

Improve the Prevention of Sudden Cardiac Arrest in Patients With Post-Acute Myocardial Infarction

BACKGROUND

Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) implantation to prevent sudden cardiac death (SCD) in post-myocardial infarction (MI) patients varies by geography but remains low in many regions despite guideline recommendations.

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to characterize the care pathway of post-MI patients and understand barriers to referral for further SCD risk stratification and management in patients meeting referral criteria.

METHODS

This prospective, nonrandomized, multi-nation study included patients ≥18 years of age, with an acute MI ≤30 days and left ventricular ejection fraction <50% ≤14 days post-MI. The primary endpoint was defined as the physician's decision to refer a patient for SCD stratification and management.

RESULTS

In total, 1,491 post-MI patients were enrolled (60.2 ± 12.0 years of age, 82.4% male). During the study, 26.7% (n = 398) of patients met criteria for further SCD risk stratification; however, only 59.3% of those meeting criteria (n = 236; 95% CI: 54.4%-64.0%) were referred for a visit. Of patients referred for SCD risk stratification and management, 94.9% (n = 224) attended the visit of which 56.7% (n =127; 95% CI: 50.1%-63.0%) met ICD indication criteria. Of patients who met ICD indication criteria, 14.2% (n = 18) were implanted.

CONCLUSIONS

We found that ∼40% of patients meeting criteria were not referred for further SCD risk stratification and management and ∼85% of patients who met ICD indications did not receive a guideline-directed ICD. Physician and patient reasons for refusing referral to SCD risk stratification and management or ICD implant varied by geography suggesting that improvement will require both physician- and patient-focused approaches. (Improve Sudden Cardiac Arrest [SCA] Bridge Study; NCT03715790).