Identification of the enzymes responsible for m2,2G and acp3U formation on cytosolic tRNA from insects and plants

A tRNA-modifying enzyme facilitates RNase P activity in Arabidopsis nuclei

RNase P is the essential activity that performs the 5' maturation of transfer RNA (tRNA) precursors. Beyond the ancestral form of RNase P containing a ribozyme, protein-only RNase P enzymes termed PRORP were identified in eukaryotes. In human mitochondria, PRORP forms a complex with two protein partners to become functional. In plants, although PRORP enzymes are active alone, we investigate their interaction network to identify potential tRNA maturation complexes. Here we investigate functional interactions involving the Arabidopsis nuclear RNase P PRORP2. We show, using an immuno-affinity strategy, that PRORP2 occurs in a complex with the tRNA methyl transferases TRM1A and TRM1B in vivo. Beyond RNase P, these enzymes can also interact with RNase Z. We show that TRM1A/TRM1B localize in the nucleus and find that their double knockout mutation results in a severe macroscopic phenotype. Using a combination of immuno-detections, mass spectrometry and a transcriptome-wide tRNA sequencing approach, we observe that TRM1A/TRM1B are responsible for the m22G26 modification of 70% of cytosolic tRNAs in vivo. We use the transcriptome wide tRNAseq approach as well as RNA blot hybridizations to show that RNase P activity is impaired in TRM1A/TRM1B mutants for specific tRNAs, in particular, tRNAs containing a m22G modification at position 26 that are strongly downregulated in TRM1A/TRM1B mutants. Altogether, results indicate that the m22G-adding enzymes TRM1A/TRM1B functionally cooperate with nuclear RNase P in vivo for the early steps of cytosolic tRNA biogenesis.

Human TRMT1 catalyzes m2G or m22G formation on tRNAs in a substrate-dependent manner

TRMT1 is an N2-methylguanosine (m2G) and N2,N2-methylguanosine (m22G) methyltransferase that targets G26 of both cytoplasmic and mitochondrial tRNAs. In higher eukaryotes, most cytoplasmic tRNAs with G26 carry m22G26, although the majority of mitochondrial G26-containing tRNAs carry m2G26 or G26, suggesting differences in the mechanisms by which TRMT1 catalyzes modification of these tRNAs. Loss-of-function mutations of human TRMT1 result in neurological disorders and completely abrogate tRNA:m22G26 formation. However, the mechanism underlying the independent catalytic activity of human TRMT1 and identity of its specific substrate remain elusive, hindering a comprehensive understanding of the pathogenesis of neurological disorders caused by TRMT1 mutations. Here, we showed that human TRMT1 independently catalyzes formation of the tRNA:m2G26 or m22G26 modification in a substrate-dependent manner, which explains the distinct distribution of m2G26 and m22G26 on cytoplasmic and mitochondrial tRNAs. For human TRMT1-mediated tRNA:m22G26 formation, the semi-conserved C11:G24 serves as the determinant, and the U10:A25 or G10:C25 base pair is also required, while the size of the variable loop has no effect. We defined the requirements of this recognition mechanism as the "m22G26 criteria". We found that the m22G26 modification occurred in almost all the higher eukaryotic tRNAs conforming to these criteria, suggesting the "m22G26 criteria" are applicable to other higher eukaryotic tRNAs.

Transfer RNA Modification Enzymes with a Thiouridine Synthetase, Methyltransferase and Pseudouridine Synthase (THUMP) Domain and the Nucleosides They Produce in tRNA

The existence of the thiouridine synthetase, methyltransferase and pseudouridine synthase (THUMP) domain was originally predicted by a bioinformatic study. Since the prediction of the THUMP domain more than two decades ago, many tRNA modification enzymes containing the THUMP domain have been identified. According to their enzymatic activity, THUMP-related tRNA modification enzymes can be classified into five types, namely 4-thiouridine synthetase, deaminase, methyltransferase, a partner protein of acetyltransferase and pseudouridine synthase. In this review, I focus on the functions and structures of these tRNA modification enzymes and the modified nucleosides they produce. Biochemical, biophysical and structural studies of tRNA 4-thiouridine synthetase, tRNA methyltransferases and tRNA deaminase have established the concept that the THUMP domain captures the 3'-end of RNA (in the case of tRNA, the CCA-terminus). However, in some cases, this concept is not simply applicable given the modification patterns observed in tRNA. Furthermore, THUMP-related proteins are involved in the maturation of other RNAs as well as tRNA. Moreover, the modified nucleosides, which are produced by the THUMP-related tRNA modification enzymes, are involved in numerous biological phenomena, and the defects of genes for human THUMP-related proteins are implicated in genetic diseases. In this review, these biological phenomena are also introduced.

Epitranscriptomics: An Additional Regulatory Layer in Plants' Development and Stress Response

Epitranscriptomics has added a new layer of regulatory machinery to eukaryotes, and the advancement of sequencing technology has revealed more than 170 post-transcriptional modifications in various types of RNAs, including messenger RNA (mRNA), transfer RNA (tRNA), ribosomal RNA (rRNA), and long non-coding RNA (lncRNA). Among these, N6-methyladenosine (m⁶A) and N5-methylcytidine (m⁵C) are the most prevalent internal mRNA modifications. These regulate various aspects of RNA metabolism, mainly mRNA degradation and translation. Recent advances have shown that regulation of RNA fate mediated by these epitranscriptomic marks has pervasive effects on a plant's development and responses to various biotic and abiotic stresses. Recently, it was demonstrated that the removal of human-FTO-mediated m⁶A from transcripts in transgenic rice and potatoes caused a dramatic increase in their yield, and that the m⁶A reader protein mediates stress responses in wheat and apple, indicating that regulation of m⁶A levels could be an efficient strategy for crop improvement. However, changing the overall m⁶A levels might have unpredictable effects; therefore, the identification of precise m⁶A levels at a single-base resolution is essential. In this review, we emphasize the roles of epitranscriptomic modifications in modulating molecular, physiological, and stress responses in plants, and provide an outlook on epitranscriptome engineering as a promising tool to ensure food security by editing specific m⁶A and m⁵C sites through robust genome-editing technology.