Serum Krebs von den Lungen-6 level predicts disease progression in interstitial lung disease

Post-COVID-19 Pulmonary Fibrosis: Facts-Challenges and Futures: A Narrative Review

Patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) usually suffer from post-acute sequelae of coronavirus disease 2019 (PASC). Pulmonary fibrosis (PF) has the most significant long-term impact on patients' respiratory health, called post-COVID-19 pulmonary fibrosis (PC19-PF). PC19- PF can be caused by acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) or pneumonia due to COVID-19. The risk factors of PC19-PF, such as older age, chronic comorbidities, the use of mechanical ventilation during the acute phase, and female sex, should be considered. Individuals with COVID-19 pneumonia symptoms lasting at least 12 weeks following diagnosis, including cough, dyspnea, exertional dyspnea, and poor saturation, accounted for nearly all disease occurrences. PC19-PF is characterized by persistent fibrotic tomographic sequelae associated with functional impairment throughout follow-up. Thus, clinical examination, radiology, pulmonary function tests, and pathological findings should be done to diagnose PC19-PF patients. PFT indicated persistent limitations in diffusion capacity and restrictive physiology, despite the absence of previous testing and inconsistency in the timeliness of assessments following acute illness. It has been hypothesized that PC19-PF patients may benefit from idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis treatment to prevent continued infection-related disorders, enhance the healing phase, and manage fibroproliferative processes. Immunomodulatory agents might reduce inflammation and the length of mechanical ventilation during the acute phase of COVID-19 infection, and the risk of the PC19-PF stage. Pulmonary rehabilitation, incorporating exercise training, physical education, and behavioral modifications, can improve the physical and psychological conditions of patients with PC19-PF.

Prediction of progressive pulmonary fibrosis in patients with anti-synthetase syndrome-associated interstitial lung disease

OBJECTIVE

Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is a common extramuscular manifestation of the anti-synthetase syndrome (ASS). Patients with ASS-ILD are at risk in developing a progressive fibrosing phenotype despite appropriate treatments. This study investigated the risk factors and the predictive value of multiple risk factors for progressive pulmonary fibrosis (PPF) in patients with ASS-ILD.

METHODS

Ninety patients with a diagnosis of ASS and evidence of ILD on high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) were recruited. Among them, 72 participants completed follow-up for more than 12 months. These patients were further divided into a PPF-ASS group (n = 18) and a non-PPF-ASS group (n = 54). Logistic regression analysis was performed to investigate the risk factors for PPF. The predictive value of the combined risk factors for predicting PPF were analyzed by a ROC curve.

RESULTS

The PPF-ASS group had a higher rate of positive non-Jo-1 antibodies, a significantly higher neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), and a significantly lower PaO2/FiO2 ratio and diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide (DLCO%pred) than the non-PPF-ASS group. In addition, elevated serum Krebs von den Lungen-6 (KL-6) level and reticular opacities were significantly more common, and corticosteroid monotherapy at onset was administered more frequently in the PPF-ASS group. The median duration of follow-up was 37.4 months, survival was poorer in the PPF-ASS group, and the overall survival was 88.9%. Multivariate regression analysis further revealed that positive non-Jo-1 antibodies, NLR, and KL-6 were independent risk factors for PPF. These combined indexes had good accuracy (area under the curve = 0.874) in predicting PPF in patients with ASS-ILD.

CONCLUSION

Positive non-Jo-1 antibodies, NLR, and serum KL-6 are independent risk factors for PPF in patients with ASS-ILD. Monitoring these markers can potentially predict PPF in this group of patients. Key Points • Positive non-Jo-1 antibodies, NLR, and serum KL-6 are independent risk factors associated with PPF in patients with ASS-ILD. • Monitoring non-Jo-1 antibodies, NLR, and serum KL-6 can potentially predict PPF in patients with ASS-ILD.

Clinical Utility of Bronchoalveolar Lavage Neutrophilia and Biomarkers for Evaluating Severity of Chronic Fibrosing Interstitial Lung Diseases

Introduction It is hypothesized that bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) neutrophilia, Krebs von den Lungen-6 (KL-6), and C-reactive protein (CRP) predict the severity of chronic fibrosing interstitial lung diseases (CF-ILDs). Methods This cross-sectional study enrolled 30 CF-ILD patients. Using Pearson's correlation analysis, BAL neutrophils, KL-6, and CRP were correlated with forced vital capacity (FVC), diffusing lung capacity for carbon monoxide (DLCO), six-minute walk distance (6MWD), partial pressure of oxygen (PaO2), computed tomography fibrosis score (CTFS), and pulmonary artery systolic pressure (PASP). Using the receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve, BAL KL-6 and CRP were evaluated against FVC% and DLCO% in isolation and combination with BAL neutrophilia for predicting the severity of CF-ILDs. Results BAL neutrophilia significantly correlated only with FVC% (r = -0.38, P = 0.04) and DLCO% (r = -0.43, P = 0.03). BAL KL-6 showed a good correlation with FVC% (r = -0.44, P < 0.05) and DLCO% (r = -0.50, P = 0.02), while BAL CRP poorly correlated with all parameters (r = 0.0-0.2). Subset analysis of BAL CRP in patients with CTFS ≤ 15 showed a better association with FVC% (r = -0.28, P = 0.05) and DLCO% (r = -0.36, P = 0.04). BAL KL-6 cut-off ≥ 72.32 U/ml and BAL CRP ≥ 14.55 mg/L predicted severe disease with area under the curve (AUC) values of 0.77 and 0.71, respectively. The combination of BAL neutrophilia, KL-6, and CRP predicted severity with an AUC value of 0.89. Conclusion The combination of BAL neutrophilia, KL-6, and CRP facilitates the severity stratification of CF-ILDs complementing existing severity parameters.

[Interstitial Lung Disease]

Diffuse interstitial lung diseases (ILD) are a heterogeneous group of respiratory disorders that are usually classified together because they have similar clinical, radiological, physiological or pathological manifestations. In the last decade there have been important scientific advances in the study of these entities, which has led to a better understanding of their pathophysiology and to the appearance of treatments that have brought about a paradigm shift in the disease. This document presents a series of questions and answers on ILD, with special emphasis on the most relevant changes in terms of pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment.

Serum KL-6 as a Biomarker of Progression at Any Time in Fibrotic Interstitial Lung Disease

The development of a progressive phenotype of interstitial lung disease (ILD) is still unpredictable. Whereas tools to predict mortality in ILD exist, scores to predict disease progression are missing. The aim of this study was to investigate whether baseline serum KL-6 as an established marker to assess disease activity in ILD, alone or in combination with clinical variables, could improve stratification of ILD patients according to progression risk at any time. Consecutive patients with fibrotic ILD, followed at our institution between 2008 and 2015, were investigated. Disease progression was defined as relative decline of ≥10% in forced vital capacity (FVC) or ≥15% in diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (DLco)% from baseline at any time. Serum KL-6 was measured using an automated immunoassay (Fujirebio Europe, Gent, Belgium). A stepwise logistic regression was performed to select variables to be included in the score. A total of 205 patients (49% idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), 51% fibrotic nonspecific interstitial pneumonia (NSIP)) were included, of them 113 (55%) developed disease progression during follow up. Male gender (G) and serum KL-6 strata (K) were significant predictors of progression at regression analysis and were included in the GK score. A threshold of 2 GK score points was best for discriminating patients at high risk versus low risk to develop disease progression at any time. Serum KL-6 concentration, alone or combined in a simple score with gender, allows an effective stratification of ILD patients for risk of disease progression at any time.

Diagnosing lung involvement in inflammatory rheumatic diseases-Where do we currently stand?

Lung involvement is the most common and serious organ manifestation in patients with inflammatory rheumatic disease (IRD). The type of pulmonary involvement can differ, but the most frequent is interstitial lung disease (ILD). The clinical manifestations of IRD-ILD and severity can vary from subclinical abnormality to dyspnea, respiratory failure, and death. Consequently, early detection is of significant importance. Pulmonary function test (PFT) including diffusing capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide (DLCO), and forced vital capacity (FVC) as well as high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) are the standard tools for screening and monitoring of ILD in IRD-patients. Especially, the diagnostic accuracy of HRCT is considered to be high. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) allow both morphological and functional assessment of the lungs. In addition, biomarkers (e.g., KL-6, CCL2, or MUC5B) are being currently evaluated for the detection and prognostic assessment of ILD. Despite the accuracy of HRCT, invasive diagnostic methods such as bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) and lung biopsy are still important in clinical practice. However, their therapeutic and prognostic relevance remains unclear. The aim of this review is to give an overview of the individual methods and to present their respective advantages and disadvantages in detecting and monitoring ILD in IRD-patients in the clinical routine.

Clinical Utility of Circulating Pneumoproteins as Diagnostic and Prognostic Biomarkers in COVID-19: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

This study explored circulating pneumoproteins in the diagnosis, severity, and prognosis of COVID-19 by meta-analysis.

METHODS

We searched five databases and other sources until December 16, 2021. Standardized mean difference (SMD) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were the overall outcomes. RevMan 5.3, Stata 16, and Meta-DiSc 1.4 were utilized for pooled analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 2432 subjects from 26 studies were included. Patients with COVID-19 had higher circulating KL-6, SP-D, and SP-A levels (SMD 1.34, 95% CI [0.60, 2.08]; SMD 1.74, 95% CI [0.64, 2.84]; SMD 3.42, 95% CI [1.31, 5.53], respectively) than healthy individuals. Circulating SP-D levels were not significantly different in survivors and non-survivors (SMD - 0.19, 95% CI [- 0.78, 0.40]). Circulating KL-6, SP-D, and RAGE levels in patients with mild to moderate COVID-19 were significantly lower (SMD - 0.93, 95% CI [- 1.22, - 0.65]; SMD - 1.32, 95% CI [- 2.34, - 0.29]; SMD - 1.17, 95% CI [- 2.06, - 0.28], respectively) than in patients with severe COVID-19. Subgroup analysis suggested that country and total number may be related to the heterogeneity when analyzing SP-D in patients with mild to moderate vs. severe COVID-19. The meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy including KL-6 for severity, KL-6 for mortality, and SP-D for severity demonstrated that they all had limited diagnostic value.

CONCLUSION

Therefore, circulating pneumoproteins (KL-6, SP-D, and RAGEs) reflect the diagnosis, severity, and prognosis of COVID-19, and follow-up studies are still needed.

Novel Biomarkers, Diagnostic and Therapeutic Approach in Rheumatoid Arthritis Interstitial Lung Disease-A Narrative Review

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is considered a systemic inflammatory disease marked by polyarthritis which affects the joints symmetrically, leading to progressive damage of the bone structure and eventually joint deformity. Lung involvement is the most prevalent extra-articular feature of RA, affecting 10-60% of patients with this disease. In this review, we aim to discuss the patterns of RA interstitial lung disease (ILD), the molecular mechanisms involved in the pathogenesis of ILD in RA, and also the therapeutic challenges in this particular extra-articular manifestation. The pathophysiology of RA-ILD has been linked to biomarkers such as anti-citrullinated protein antibodies (ACPAs), MUC5B mutation, Krebs von den Lungen 6 (KL-6), and other environmental factors such as smoking. Patients at the highest risk for RA-ILD and those most likely to advance will be identified using biomarkers. The hope is that finding biomarkers with good performance characteristics would help researchers better understand the pathophysiology of RA-ILD and, in turn, lead to the development of tailored therapeutics for this severe RA manifestation.

Post-COVID-19 Pulmonary Fibrosis

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has infected millions worldwide with a high mortality rate due to a lack of definitive treatment. Despite having a wide range of clinical features, acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) has emerged as the primary cause of mortality in these patients. Risk factors and comorbidities like advanced age with limited lung function, pre-existing diabetes, hypertension, cardiovascular diseases, and obesity have increased the risk for severe COVID-19 infection. Rise in inflammatory markers like transforming growth factor β (TGF-β), interleukin-6 (IL-6), and expression of matrix metalloproteinase 1 and 7 (MMP-1, MMP-7), along with collagen deposition at the site of lung injury, results in extensive lung scarring and fibrosis. Anti-fibrotic drugs, such as Pirfenidone and Nintedanib, have emerged as potential treatment options for post-COVID-19 pulmonary fibrosis. A lung transplant might be the only life-saving treatment. Despite the current advances in the management of COVID-19, there is still a considerable knowledge gap in the management of long-term sequelae in such patients, especially concerning pulmonary fibrosis. Follow up on the current clinical trials and research to test the efficacy of various anti-inflammatory drugs is needed to prevent long-term sequelae early mortality in these patients.

Blood Krebs von den Lungen-6 levels predict treatment response to antifibrotic therapy in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis

BACKGROUND

Antifibrotic therapy can slow disease progression (DP) in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). However, the prognostic biomarkers for DP in patients with IPF receiving antifibrotic therapy have not been identified. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the prognostic efficacy of serum Krebs von den Lungen-6 (KL-6) for DP in patients with IPF receiving antifibrotic therapy.

METHODS

The clinical data of 188 patients with IPF who initiated antifibrotic therapy at three tertiary hospitals was retrospectively analyzed. DP was defined as a relative decline in forced vital capacity (FVC) ≥ 10%, diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide ≥ 15%, acute exacerbation, or deaths during 6 months after antifibrotic therapy.

RESULTS

The mean age of patients was 68.9 years, 77.7% were male, and DP occurred in 43 patients (22.9%) during follow-up (median, 7.6 months; interquartile range, 6.2-9.8 months). There was no difference in baseline KL-6 levels between the DP and no-DP groups; however, among patients with high baseline KL-6 levels (≥ 500 U/mL), changes in KL-6 levels over 1 month were higher in the DP group than those in the non-DP group, and higher relative changes in KL-6 over 1 month were independently associated with DP (odds ratio, 1.043; 95% confidence interval 1.005-1.084) in the multivariable logistic analysis adjusted for age and FVC. In the receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, the 1-month change in KL-6 was also useful for predicting DP (area under the curve = 0.707; P < 0.012).

CONCLUSIONS

Our data suggest that the relative change in KL-6 over 1 month might be useful for predicting DP in patients with IPF receiving antifibrotic therapy when baseline KL6 is high.

KL-6 as an Immunological Biomarker Predicts the Severity, Progression, Acute Exacerbation, and Poor Outcomes of Interstitial Lung Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Object

Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is a specific form of chronic fibrosing interstitial pneumonia with various etiology. The severity and progression of ILD usually predict the poor outcomes of ILD. Otherwise, Krebs von den Lungen-6 (KL-6) is a potential immunological biomarker reflecting the severity and progression of ILD. This meta-analysis is to clarify the predictive value of elevated KL-6 levels in ILD.

Method

EBSCO, PubMed, and Cochrane were systematically searched for articles exploring the prognosis of ILD published between January 1980 and April 2021. The Weighted Mean Difference (WMD) and 95% Confidence Interval (CI) were computed as the effect sizes for comparisons between groups. For the relationship between adverse outcome and elevated KL-6 concentration, Hazard Ratio (HR), and its 95%CI were used to estimate the risk factor of ILD.

Result

Our result showed that ILD patients in severe and progressive groups had higher KL-6 levels, and the KL-6 level of patients in the severe ILD was 703.41 (U/ml) than in mild ILD. The KL-6 level in progressive ILD group was 325.98 (U/ml) higher than that in the non-progressive ILD group. Secondly, the KL-6 level of patients in acute exacerbation (AE) of ILD was 545.44 (U/ml) higher than stable ILD. Lastly, the higher KL-6 level in ILD patients predicted poor outcomes. The KL-6 level in death of ILD was 383.53 (U/ml) higher than in survivors of ILD. The pooled HR (95%CI) about elevated KL-6 level predicting the mortality of ILD was 2.05 (1.50–2.78), and the HR (95%CI) for progression of ILD was 1.98 (1.07–3.67).

Conclusion

The elevated KL-6 level indicated more severe, more progressive, and predicted the higher mortality and poor outcomes of ILD.

The value of KL-6 in the diagnosis and assessment of interstitial lung disease

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the value of Krebs von den Lungen-6 (KL-6) in the diagnosis and activity assessment of interstitial lung disease (ILD).

METHODS

The data of 69 ILD patients admitted to our hospital from January 2018 to January 2020 were analyzed retrospectively, and they were included in the ILD group. In addition, 69 patients with connective tissue disease (CTD) admitted to our hospital during the same period were selected and included in the non-ILD (NILD) group. The lung function, pulmonary imaging scores, and KL-6 expression levels were compared between the two groups. The patients in the ILD group were divided into two subgroups: the inactive group and the active group. The pulmonary function, pulmonary imaging scores, and the KL-6 expression levels of the patients in the two subgroups were compared. The value of KL-6 in the diagnosis and the ILD activity evaluation were analyzed.

RESULTS

The FEV1, FVC, and DLCO levels in the LID group were lower than they were in the NLID group (P<0.05). The LUS and Warrick scores in the LID group were higher than they were in the NLID group (P<0.05). The FEV1, FVC, and DLCO levels in the active group were lower than they were in the inactive group (P<0.05). The LUS and Warrick scores in the active group were higher than they were in the NLID group (P<0.05). The patients' serum KL-6 levels in the ILD group were higher than they were in the NILD group (P<0.05), and the patients' serum KL-6 levels in the ILD group were higher than they were in the inactive group (P<0.05). The Youden's index of serum KL-6 for the diagnosis of ILD was 421.775 U/ml and the sensitivity and specificity of the serum KL-6 were 91.304% and 95.652%, respectively, showing a high diagnostic value (P<0.05). The Youden's index of the serum KL-6 levels for the evaluation of the ILD activity was den Lungen-6 (KL-, with a sensitivity of 60.976% and a specificity of 100%, showing a moderate evaluation value (P<0.05).

CONCLUSION

KL-6 has a high value in the diagnosis of interstitial lung disease, and a moderate value in the assessment of interstitial lung disease activity.