Expression pattern determines regulatory logic

Range of chromatin accessibility configurations are permissive of GABAergic fate acquisition in developing mouse brain

In recent single-cell -omics studies, both the differential activity of transcription factors regulating cell fate determination and differential genome activation have been tested for utility as descriptors of cell types. Naturally, genome accessibility and gene expression are interlinked. To understand the variability in genomic feature activation in the GABAergic neurons of different spatial origins, we have mapped accessible chromatin regions and mRNA expression in single cells derived from the developing mouse central nervous system (CNS). We first defined a reference set of open chromatin regions for scATAC-seq read quantitation across samples, allowing comparison of chromatin accessibility between brain regions and cell types directly. Second, we integrated the scATAC-seq and scRNA-seq data to form a unified resource of transcriptome and chromatin accessibility landscape for the cell types in di- and telencephalon, midbrain and anterior hindbrain of E14.5 mouse embryo. Importantly, we implemented resolution optimization at the clustering, and automatized the cell typing step. We show high level of concordance between the cell clustering based on the chromatin accessibility and the transcriptome in analyzed neuronal lineages, indicating that both genome and transcriptome features can be used for cell type definition. Hierarchical clustering by the similarity in accessible chromatin reveals that the genomic feature activation correlates with neurotransmitter phenotype, selector gene expression, cell differentiation stage and neuromere origins.

Early effects of gene duplication on the robustness and phenotypic variability of gene regulatory networks

Background

Research on gene duplication is abundant and comes from a wide range of approaches, from high-throughput analyses and experimental evolution to bioinformatics and theoretical models. Notwithstanding, a consensus is still lacking regarding evolutionary mechanisms involved in evolution through gene duplication as well as the conditions that affect them. We argue that a better understanding of evolution through gene duplication requires considering explicitly that genes do not act in isolation. It demands studying how the perturbation that gene duplication implies percolates through the web of gene interactions. Due to evolution’s contingent nature, the paths that lead to the final fate of duplicates must depend strongly on the early stages of gene duplication, before gene copies have accumulated distinctive changes.

Methods

Here we use a widely-known model of gene regulatory networks to study how gene duplication affects network behavior in early stages. Such networks comprise sets of genes that cross-regulate. They organize gene activity creating the gene expression patterns that give cells their phenotypic properties. We focus on how duplication affects two evolutionarily relevant properties of gene regulatory networks: mitigation of the effect of new mutations and access to new phenotypic variants through mutation.

Results

Among other observations, we find that those networks that are better at maintaining the original phenotype after duplication are usually also better at buffering the effect of single interaction mutations and that duplication tends to enhance further this ability. Moreover, the effect of mutations after duplication depends on both the kind of mutation and genes involved in it. We also found that those phenotypes that had easier access through mutation before duplication had higher chances of remaining accessible through new mutations after duplication.

Conclusion

Our results support that gene duplication often mitigates the impact of new mutations and that this effect is not merely due to changes in the number of genes. The work that we put forward helps to identify conditions under which gene duplication may enhance evolvability and robustness to mutations.

Cell types as species: Exploring a metaphor

The concept of "cell type," though fundamental to cell biology, is controversial. Cells have historically been classified into types based on morphology, physiology, or location. More recently, single cell transcriptomic studies have revealed fine-scale differences among cells with similar gross phenotypes. Transcriptomic snapshots of cells at various stages of differentiation, and of cells under different physiological conditions, have shown that in many cases variation is more continuous than discrete, raising questions about the relationship between cell type and cell state. Some researchers have rejected the notion of fixed types altogether. Throughout the history of discussions on cell type, cell biologists have compared the problem of defining cell type with the interminable and often contentious debate over the definition of arguably the most important concept in systematics and evolutionary biology, "species." In the last decades, systematics, like cell biology, has been transformed by the increasing availability of molecular data, and the fine-grained resolution of genetic relationships have generated new ideas about how that variation should be classified. There are numerous parallels between the two fields that make exploration of the "cell types as species" metaphor timely. These parallels begin with philosophy, with discussion of both cell types and species as being either individuals, groups, or something in between (e.g., homeostatic property clusters). In each field there are various different types of lineages that form trees or networks that can (and in some cases do) provide criteria for grouping. Developing and refining models for evolutionary divergence of species and for cell type differentiation are parallel goals of the two fields. The goal of this essay is to highlight such parallels with the hope of inspiring biologists in both fields to look for new solutions to similar problems outside of their own field.

Metacode: One code to rule them all

The code of codes or metacode is a microcosm where biological layers, as well as their codes, interact together allowing the continuity of information flow in organisms by increasing biological entities' complexity. Through this novel organic code, biological systems scale towards niches with higher informatic freedom building structures that increase the entropy in the universe. Code biology has developed a novel informational framework where biological entities strive themselves through the information flow carried out through organic codes consisting of two molecular or functional landscapes intertwined through arbitrary linkages via an adaptor whose nature is autonomous from molecular determinism. Here we will integrate genomic and epigenomic codes according to the evidence released in ENCODE (phase 3), psychENCODE and GTEx project, outlining the principles of the metacode, to address the continuous nature of biological systems and their inter-layered information flow. This novel complex metacode maps from very constrained sets of elements (i.e., regulation sites modulating gene expression) to new ones with greater freedom of decoding (i.e., a continuous cell phenotypic space). This leads to a new domain in code biology where biological systems are informatic attractors that navigate an energy metaspace through a complexity-noise balance, stalling in emergent niches where organic codes take meaning.